[Explanations: lol your fat. pathetic anger bread. hey your gay.]
Belly up to the bar,
and be in this space together.
This blogaround brought to you by grapes.
Recommended Reading:
Gemma Hartley: [Content Note: Emotional labor; patriarchy] Women Aren't Nags — We're Just Fed Up
Sarah Kendzior: Trump's Sparring with North Korea Is a Reminder That Foolishness Really Can Kill
Dan Van Winkle: Julia Louis-Dreyfus Reveals Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Pushes for Universal Health Care
Sabha: Tinder Tourism and the Accidental Date with a Straight Woman
Ryan F. Mandelbaum: 'There Are No Words': Tourists Spot Hundreds of Polar Bears Swarming Whale Carcass in Siberia
Beth Elderkin: David S. Pumpkins Is Getting His Own SNL Animated Special
Leave your links and recommendations in comments. Self-promotion welcome and encouraged!
Because Jessica Luther is one of the best human beings on the planet, she made sure I saw the heart-exploding adorableness that David Beckham posted on Instagram yesterday. And now I get to make sure that you see it, too.
Becks is everything. ♥
Someone’s ready for her first football lesson ❤️ ⚽️
A post shared by David Beckham (@davidbeckham) on
I'm feeling very anxious about the state of things at the moment. I have an uneasy feeling about the way the investigations are going. I don't like the way it appears that Manafort might be a fall guy, especially since indicting Manafort won't to do shit to stop this Nazi takeover. I'm chronically stressed about the lack of urgency among the nation's non-executive leaders to halt this authoritarianism in its tracks and reverse the egregious abuses that are being enacted every day. I feel unsafe.
Aside from politics, I am looking forward to a visit with one of my best friends this weekend.
How are you?
The mayor of San Juan, Puerto Rico, lashed out at acting Secretary of Homeland Security Elaine Duke's comment that the Hurricane Maria relief efforts are a "good news story," saying, that in reality, it's a "people are dying story."I know that's a long excerpt, but I hope you read every single word of it and understand the scope of what is happening in Puerto Rico while Trump brags about how great his administration is doing and sends out his flunkies to call it a "good news story."
Speaking outside the White House on Thursday, Duke said she is "very satisfied" with efforts to aid Puerto Rico in the wake of Maria, which devastated the island and has created a humanitarian crisis. Duke said, "It is really a good news story," an assessment that prompted San Juan Mayor Carmen Yulín Cruz's strong rebuttal.
"Well, maybe from where she's standing, it's a good news story. When you're drinking from a creek, it's not a good news story. When you don't have food for a baby, it's not a good news story," Cruz told CNN's "New Day," referring to the plight of Puerto Ricans, many of whom have received little or no aid thus far. "When you have to pull people down from their buildings — I'm sorry, but that really upsets me and frustrates me. You know, I would ask her to come down here and visit the towns, and then make a statement like that, which frankly, it is an irresponsible statement."
"Damn it, this is not a good news story. This is a people are dying story. This is a life-or-death story. This is a 'there's a truckload of stuff that cannot be taken to people story.' This is a story of a devastation that continues to worsen because people are not getting food and water," she continued. "It is not a good news story when people are dying, when they don't have dialysis, when their generators aren't working, and their oxygen isn't providing for them. Where is there good news here? ...I'm really sorry, but you know when you have people out there dying, literally, scraping for food, where is the good news?"
The issue, Cruz said, has not been a lack of supplies but an inability to deal with the logistics of distributing aid on an island that is still largely without power and supplying it to Puerto Rico's more rural areas. The mayor said San Juan had received three pallets of water — slightly more than 4,000 bottles for a population of roughly 350,000 people — as well as four pallets of food and 12 pallets of baby food and supplies.
The situation in other parts of the island are even more dire, Cruz said, relaying her interaction with another Puerto Rican mayor, who said his residents had no food, no medicine, had not yet received any aid and were drinking from the same creek they were using to wash themselves and their clothes. Nursing homes must be a priority, she said, because they "are becoming just human cages for people that are sick and unable to fend for themselves."
Cruz was clear that she remains appreciative of the federal government teams that have arrived on the island to help but that those teams have thus far been insufficient to overcome the logistical hurdles presented by the island.
Nothing here about protecting against foreign sabotage, despite the fact Russia has knocked out power in Ukraine. https://t.co/l0ZtJvZo0K
— Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) September 29, 2017
[Content Note: Racism.]
Earlier this week, five Black cadet candidates at the Air Force Academy Preparatory School found racial slurs on the message boards on the doors of their rooms. The incident became public after the mother of one of the cadet candidates posted a photo on Facebook, showing the words "Go home [anti-Black slur]" written on her son's message board. She wrote: "These young people are supposed to bond and protect each other and the country. Who would my son have to watch out for? The enemy or the enemy?"
School officials have launched an investigation into the racist harassment.
Yesterday, the superintendent of the United States Air Force Academy (USAFA), Lt. Gen. Jay B. Silveria, addressed cadets and telling them in no uncertain terms that such behavior was comprehensively unacceptable. At the end of a five-minute speech, he directed them to take out their phones and record him as he said: "If you can't treat someone with dignity and respect, then get out."
Ladies and gentlemen, you may have heard that some people down in the prep school wrote some racial slurs on some message boards. If you haven't heard that, I wanted you to hear it from me. If you're outraged by those words, then you're in the right place. That kind of behavior has no place at the prep school, it has no place at USAFA, and it has no place in the United States Air Force. You should be outraged not only as an airman, but as a human being.I don't know if Black cadet candidates feel reassured by these words. I don't know if they'd agree that discussions about Charlottesville are effective. I don't know if they feel like the Air Force is their institution as much as it is their white peers'. And I wouldn't presume to know how they feel, or assume they all feel the same way, or forget that Lt. Gen. Silveria's words might not seem as powerful to them as they seem to many people who are sharing his address.
And I'll tell you that the appropriate response for horrible language and horrible ideas — the appropriate response is a better idea. So that's why I'm here. That's why all these people are up here on the staff tower. So let me have everybody who's up here please pull forward to the rails. [gestures to encourage people to move forward, beside him] Also, there are so many people here, they're lining the outsides along the windows. [gestures around the perimeter of the room]
These are members of the faculty, coaching staff, AOCs, AMTs, from the airfield, from my staff, from my headquarters. All aspects of the 10th Air Base Wing; all aspects that make up USAFA and the United State Air Force Academy. Leadership is here: You heard from Brigadier General Goodwin; Brigadier General Armacost is here; Colonel Block from the athletic department is here; Mr. Knowlton is in Washington, D.C. right now. That's why they're here; that's why we're all here. Because we have a better idea.
Some of you may think that that happened down in the prep school and doesn't apply to us. I would be naive, and we would all be naive, to think that everything is perfect here. We would be naive to think that we shouldn't discuss this topic. We would also be tone deaf not to think about the backdrop of what's going on in our country — things like Charlottesville and Ferguson; the protests in the NFL. That's why we have a better idea.
One of those ideas: The dean brought people together to discuss Charlottesville. Because what we should have is a civil discourse and talk about these issues. That's a better idea. We received outstanding feedback from that session on Charlottesville.
But I also have a better idea, and it's about our diversity. And it's the power of the diversity, the power of the 4,000 of you, and all of the people that are on the staff tower and lining the glass, the power of us as a diverse group. The power that we come from all walks of life, that we come from all parts of this county, that we come from all races, we come from all backgrounds, gender, all makeup, all upbringing. The power of that diversity comes together and makes us that much more powerful. That's a much better idea than small thinking and horrible ideas.
We have an opportunity here, the 5,500 people in this room, to think about what we are as an institution. This is our institution, and no one can take away our values. No one can write on a board and question our values. No one can take that away from us.
So just in case you're unclear on where I stand on this topic, I'm gonna leave you with my most important thought today: If you can't treat someone with dignity and respect, then you need to get out. If you can't treat someone from another gender, whether that's a man or a woman, with dignity and respect, then you need to get out. If you demean someone in any way, then you need to get out. And if you can't treat someone from another race, or a different color skin, with dignity and respect, then you need to get out.
Reach for your phones. I'm serious — reach for your phones. [pauses; looks around the room] Okay, you don't have to reach for your phones; I'm gonna give you an opportunity to reach for your phones. Grab your phones — I want you to videotape this so that you have it; so that you can use it. [pauses] So that we all have the moral courage together. All of us on the staff tower, lining the glass, all of us in this room. [pauses]
This is our institution. And if you need it, and you need my words, then you keep these words — and you use them, and you remember them, and you share them, and you talk about them: If you can't treat someone with dignity and respect, then get out.
[turns abruptly and walks away from the microphone]
This is absolutely chilling: The Department of Justice has identified three people they call "anti-administration activists," and have served search warrants on Facebook demanding those users' private account information — and thousands of others who interacted with those users. Facebook has not disclosed whether it plans to, or already has, complied with the warrants.
Jessica Schneider at CNN reports:
Trump administration lawyers are demanding the private account information of potentially thousands of Facebook users in three separate search warrants served on the social media giant, according to court documents obtained by CNN.I wish I could be hopeful that the ACLU will prevail, but when the Trump administration sought "to unmask every person who visited an anti-Trump website in what privacy advocates say is an unconstitutional 'fishing expedition' for political dissidents," the court ruled in their favor: "DC Superior Court Judge Robert Morin largely granted prosecutors' request to collect a vast set of records from the company, which will include emails of the users who signed up for an account associated with the website, and membership lists."
The warrants specifically target the accounts of three Facebook users who are described by their attorneys as "anti-administration activists who have spoken out at organized events, and who are generally very critical of this administration's policies."
One of those users, Emmelia Talarico, operated the disruptj20 page where Inauguration Day protests were organized and discussed; the page was visited by an estimated 6,000 users whose identities the government would have access to if Facebook hands over the information sought in the search warrants. In court filings, Talarico says if her account information was given to the government, officials would have access to her "personal passwords, security questions and answers, and credit card information," plus "the private lists of invitees and attendees to multiple political events sponsored by the page."
...The American Civil Liberties Union, representing the three Facebook users, filed a motion to quash the warrants Thursday.
"What is particularly chilling about these warrants is that anti-administration political activists are going to have their political associations and views scrutinized by the very administration they are protesting," said ACLU attorney Scott Michelman.
...The fact is that Puerto Rico has been destroyed by two hurricanes. Big decisions will have to be made as to the cost of its rebuilding!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 29, 2017
This is the President of the United States suggesting that the federal government might decide not to rebuild Puerto Rico if it's too costly https://t.co/1LYbHS4Cnb
— Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) September 29, 2017
Suggested by Shaker catvoncat: "What advice or words of encouragement would you give to your younger self?"
"You're enough."
[Content Note: Injury; bleeding; neglect.]
I am running out of ways to describe how terrible a human being Donald Trump really is. He is so terrible.
Marlow Stern at the Daily Beast: The Time Donald Trump Turned Away in Disgust While a Man Was Bleeding to Death in Front of Him.
"Like most Trump tales," Stern writes, "what was intended as a story about the bravery and heroism of a handful of Marines instead revealed far more about the man telling it."
Indeed.
I am so ashamed this man is the president of my country.
Here is your semi-regular make-up thread, to discuss all things make-up and make-up adjacent.
Do you have a make-up product you'd recommend? Are you looking for the perfect foundation which has remained frustratingly elusive? Need or want to offer make-up tips? Searching for hypoallergenic products? Want to grouse about how you hate make-up? Want to gush about how you love it?
Whatever you like—have at it!
* * *
My apologies for not doing a make-up thread in so long! I just haven't had any occasion to buy or wear make-up in ages — and, even now, it's another make-up adjacent item from me this time: Neutrogena's Hydro Boost Water Gel.
Since today is National Poetry Day, I decided I would write a sonnet for Donald Trump. Don't say I never gave you anything, u bum!
During Mike Pence's time as governor of Indiana, 1 out of 6 Hoosiers had to depend on food stamps and/or food pantries to get enough to eat. https://t.co/ecaaCKEKA5
— Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) September 27, 2017
In an interview with ABC News' George Stephanopoulos Thursday, top White House economic adviser Gary Cohn said the tax plan was "purely aimed at middle class families," but stopped short of guaranteeing they wouldn't see a tax hike.Wow. WOW.
"If I'm hearing you correctly, you can't guarantee that no middle class family will get a tax increase," Stephanopoulos asked Cohn. "There will be middle class families who get a tax increase under your plan, correct?"
"George, there's an exception to every rule," Cohn said.
"So that's a yes," Stephanopoulos pressed.
"Look, I can't guarantee anything," Cohn dodged again. "You could always find a unique family somewhere."
A comprehensive study released today suggests how many missing votes can be attributed to the new law. Researchers at the University of Wisconsin-Madison surveyed registered voters who didn't cast a 2016 ballot in the state's two biggest counties—Milwaukee and Dane, which is home to Madison. More than 1 out of 10 nonvoters (11.2 percent) said they lacked acceptable voter ID and cited the law as a reason why they didn't vote; 6.4 percent of respondents said the voter ID law was the "main reason" they didn't vote.Trump carried Wisconsin by just 22,000 votes.
The study's lead author, University of Wisconsin political scientist Kenneth Mayer, says between roughly 9,000 and 23,000 registered voters in the reliably Democratic counties were deterred from voting by the ID law. Extrapolating statewide, he says the data suggests as many as 45,000 voters sat out the election, though he cautioned that it was difficult to produce an estimate from just two counties.
"We have hard evidence there were tens of thousands of people who were unable to vote because of the voter ID law," Mayer told me.
The Facebook group United Muslims of America was neither united, Muslim, nor American.This is also very important:
Instead, sources familiar with the group tell The Daily Beast, it was an imposter account on the world's largest social network that's been traced back to the Russian government.
Using the account as a front to reach American Muslims and their allies, the Russians pushed memes that claimed Hillary Clinton admitted the U.S. "created, funded, and armed" al-Qaeda [and] falsely alleged Osama bin Laden was a "CIA agent."
...The Kremlin-backed trolls did all this while simultaneously using other accounts to hawk virulently Islamophobic messages to right-wing audiences on Facebook, such as an August 2016 Twin Falls, Idaho rally demanding, "We must stop taking in Muslim refugees!" Taken together, the newest revelation of Russian propaganda on Facebook shows the sophistication of the Russian "active measures" campaign to influence the U.S. voting public.
"Russia knows no ends and no limits to which groups they would masquerade as to carry out their objectives," Rep. Eric Swalwell, a Democrat on the House intelligence committee, told the Daily Beast.
Check out this new Oxford study on swing states and misinformation leading up to election https://t.co/L0e65BFjDJ
— Clint Watts (@selectedwisdom) September 28, 2017
Judges typically do not spend their early months on the bench conspicuously doing favors for the political actors who helped place them there. As the Atlantic's Garrett Epps writes, "having decided to accept a nomination so befouled by politics, Gorsuch might have displayed a sense of humility." Instead, "he will not even pretend to care about how the losers in the process see either him, or the Court."The courts are the last remaining check and balance, since Congressional Republicans have abandoned all pretense of providing any checks and balances on the executive branch, which has been filled with people who have naught but contempt for the law. And the court majority is increasingly comprised of conservative partisans who no longer care about the appearance of partisanship. This is very, very bad for our national future.
...Gorsuch owes his job to a fundamentally undemocratic system.
The man who appointed him won nearly 3 million fewer votes than the winner of the popular vote. The senators who opposed Gorsuch represent over 18 million more people than the ones who supported him. Meanwhile, President Barack Obama, a man who won two popular elections, did not get to fill the seat that Gorsuch now occupies.
So there's a devilish symmetry about the fact that Gorsuch is likely to spend his first full term on the Court fighting to make America even less democratic.
this pic is my new forever answer to "why won't Hillary just go away?" pic.twitter.com/Yz2N2RPfcW
— Jesse Lehrich (@JesseLehrich) September 28, 2017
After saying yesterday he wouldn't waive the Jones Act for Puerto Rico, under pressure Trump has finally waived it this morning. Good.
— Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) September 28, 2017
But still. This is better than stubbornly refusing to hold fast to his previous position.
— Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) September 28, 2017
But the only thing that worked was pressure -- and sustained pressure will be needed to extend the window long beyond 10 measly days.
— Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) September 28, 2017
Of course Donald Trump is sowing discord among sports fans. Of course he is.
Because sport is one of the last arenas in which people with vastly different political views can still set aside their differences for a couple of hours and be on the same team.
Because sport is one the few arenas in which white boys have Black role models, and boys can have female role models. (Donald Trump doesn't care who girls look up to.)
Because sport is one of the only arenas in which it costs virtually nothing to be a fan: There's nothing one has to buy, and many games, races, matches, fixtures, and various competitions from a variety of sports are viewable on network television. Even with ticket prices having skyrocketed and the cost of jerseys being ridiculous these days, and so forth and so on, sport itself isn't exclusive to the very wealthy.
None of this works with Donald Trump's divisive, white supremacist, chauvinist, classist worldview.
And he is not a president who is interested in unity. He is a president who is interested in division. In pitting Americans against one another. In exploiting every crack in every last space in which solidarity of any sort might yet exist.
He knows we're stronger together, and so — with, as always, a little help from his friends in Russia — he seeks to make us weaker apart.
This blogaround brought to you by squid ink.
Recommended Reading:
Andrew David Thaler: How to Help Island Residents in the Wake of Total Devastation
Monica Roberts: [Content Note: White supremacy] Being a Black Athlete Has Always Been Political
Christopher Stroop: [CN: White supremacy; toxic evangelicalism] The Washington Post and the Kaepernick Controversy: A Tale of Normalizing Toxic Christianity
Sue Kerr: [CN: Trans hatred; violence; murder] Ally Steinfeld,17, of Missouri Is the 21st Trans Person Killed in 2017
Kenrya Rankin: [CN: Anti-blackness] Survey Reveals How Racism Impacts the Lives of Black Americans
Jenn Fang: [CN: Racism; internment] Proposed Airport Fence at Tule Lake Will Cut Off Access to WW2-era Incarceration Camp History
George Dvorsky: These Canadian Rocks May Contain the Oldest Known Traces of Life
Leave your links and recommendations in comments. Self-promotion welcome and encouraged!
[Content Note: Reproductive coercion; shaming; sexual assault.]
At Rewire, Eleanor J. Bader has a fascinating review of sociologist Orna Donath's new book Regretting Motherhood, about Donath's "in-depth, five-year study that involved 23 pseudonymous Israeli women," all of whom wish they had not had children.
Donath's subjects ranged in age from 26 to 73 and included single, divorced, and married women of all class backgrounds and education levels. All had at least one child; offspring spanned from toddlerhood to middle-aged adults. Five of the women were also grandmothers, and while all were Jewish, the majority self-identified as either atheists or secular.That conclusion is a subject of great interest to me, and one about which I've written many times before, perhaps never as pointedly as in "Pro-Choice: Choosing Not to Parent," where I noted:
Donath's conclusion is forthright: Motherhood should be one choice among many, no more or less valid than other life options.
Motherhood doesn't make everyone happy. What makes people happy is being able to fashion their lives into the shapes they want.That should and must include women who have chosen to parent and wish they had made another choice.
This is a reproductive choice we don't talk about so much, because it's inevitably inferred to be implicitly censurous of parenting and/or children. I am not anti-parenting. I don't dislike children. I am, however, deeply contemptuous of the bad faith interpretations that misconstrue child-free advocacy as one of many reproductive options to be inherently anti-parent/child. I talk about my happiness being child-free because I support a spectrum of equally valid reproductive choice, which includes parenting, too.
It's important for us, collectively, not to silence women who choose and are happy to be child-free—and not just because we're a useful demographic to defend the need for comprehensive reproductive choice and undermine bullshit gender essentialist, cissexist narratives about "natural instincts" and "what women are meant to do." It's important because there isn't really meaningful choice without a public discussion of all those choices, by the people who made them.
by Shaker Carina (@checarina)
"I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color." — NFL player Colin Kaepernick in August 2016, explaining why he chose not to stand during the playing of the national anthem.It was in maybe 7th or 8th grade that I stopped saying the pledge of allegiance entirely.
Trump can try to erase his support of Strange, but under the Presidential Records Act, all his tweets must be archived (we're suing over it) https://t.co/GzI64bKu1g
— Citizens for Ethics (@CREWcrew) September 27, 2017
We'll surely hear about how these tax cuts will boost economic growth and create thousands of well-paying jobs in the U.S. But we're not likely to hear much about how Congress or the Trump administration expects to pay for them, because the simple fact is, they can't...But we are all obliged to discuss it. Again and again. Because the Republican Party are big believers in recycling when it comes to their debunked, discredited, garbage policy ideas.
That means the national debt will continue to grow, despite all the promises of Trump and the Republican Party leadership, who have been as adamant about the ballooning debt for the past six or seven years as they were about repealing and replacing Obamacare.
...The point is, unpaid-for tax cuts add as much to the national debt as food stamps or disability payments or other benefits for "undeserving" people. But Republicans won't insist on spending cuts to offset the lost revenue, as they used to do when President Barack Obama was in the White House.
Why? Because they still believe in the self-serving fantasy that tax cuts stimulate economic growth and create jobs. This notion has been debunked so thoroughly I shouldn't have to discuss it...
Every candidate including Gary Johnson espoused this absurd position on allying w/ Russia, except of course Clinton. https://t.co/ucOhukVJYG
— Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) September 27, 2017
Thousands did not vote in Wisconsin during 2016 election, deterred by "confusing" state voter ID laws: study https://t.co/E3tqisMPrm pic.twitter.com/a24QWxcsDn
— The Hill (@thehill) September 26, 2017
September 30 will mark the two year anniversary of Moscow's intervention in Syria that saved Syrian President Bashar al-Assad from an eminent collapse. Assad is largely responsible for one of the worst humanitarian tragedies since World War II. Today, in no small part thanks to Russian President Vladimir Putin, he has emerged in the strongest position since massive uprisings swept the country in March 2011.Note above that every U.S. presidential candidate except Hillary Clinton proposed allying with Putin to help him achieve these goals.
...Putin's support for Assad's ethnic cleansing campaign exacerbated massive and destabilizing refugee flows into Europe. As long as Assad or someone like him remains in power, the majority of refugees will not return home. Assad's traditional foes, such as Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan have come to accept Moscow's view on Assad, and even Saudi Arabia may be shifting its position in Moscow's favor.
Most importantly for Putin, he can now showcase cooperation with the West — on his terms. He created a perception of Russia as a great power broker and obtained international recognition for his latest ceasefire initiative in southwest Syria that led to establishment of de-escalation zones after Putin met with Trump in July of this year.
the global silence about Chechnya's gay genocide has given license to another pogrom. https://t.co/W3089ECGAr
— Anthony Oliveira (@meakoopa) September 27, 2017
Copyright 2009 Shakesville. Powered by Blogger. Blogger Showcase
Blogger Templates created by Deluxe Templates. Wordpress by K2