Showing posts with label Putin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Putin. Show all posts

The Entire Trump Family Is a Global Embarrassment

After painfully reminding us once again that the collusion is still happening right out in the open by slobbering all over Vladimir Putin at the G20, Donald Trump then went on a four-day blitz through Asia where he slobbered all over North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un.

It was another despicable display of Trump's affinity for murderous authoritarians, and political scientist Brian Klaas wrote about the chilling, reverberating effects that the U.S. president's embrace of dictators will inevitably have:

I study authoritarianism — and also how it functions in places that aren't always in headlines. What many don't realize is that Trump's embrace of dictators will likely have a cascading effect. Other autocrats will think: Well, if Putin or Kim can get away with it, why not me?

Most dictators and despots are driven by a desire to retain power. What can topple them? Well, opposition leaders, dissidents, journalists, and human rights campaigners who try to expose abuses and corruption can destabilize a regime. That's why dictators kill or jail them.

In other words, the rational behavior for a dictator or despot is often to silence critics, rule by fear, and generally be a monstrous tyrant. What has held many back is: 1) International norms; and 2) The risk of consequences from foreign powers (almost always in the West).

When Trump acts like Putin and Kim and MBS are his best friends, it doesn't just legitimize those regimes. It also signals to other authoritarians that there will be no consequences. That international norms no longer matter. You can murder journalists. Trump will do nothing.

Yes, previous presidents have had relationships with awful regimes in the past. But they didn't simply uncritically fawn over people like Kim Jong-un. They didn't give them propaganda victories for nothing. They didn't treat them better than America's democratic allies.

The Trump effect will take time. It won't happen overnight. But Trump's foreign policy will make the world worse and more authoritarian, creating a world in which dictators and despots can commit atrocities and horrifying abuses with less fear of any meaningful consequences.
And as Sarah Kendzior further notes: "This is not just about the shattering of international norms. This is about the shattering and taking of human life. We need to focus on the ordinary people being brutalized by this axis of autocrats."

This is urgent threat of the Trump presidency: It's not just that he's endeavoring to destroy everything democrats value in the United States, but that he is working in concert with other powerful and tenacious democracy-killers around the globe, like Putin and Benjamin Netanyahu, to usher in a new era of despotism.

The refugee crisis at the U.S. southern border, for instance, is a profound humanitarian crisis. It is also an international law crisis — because the Trump Regime is ignoring international law governing refugees with zero consequences, which could have a cascading effect just as the global refugee crisis reaches staggering proportions: A recent U.N. report found that there are currently 71 million refugees who "have been displaced worldwide by war, persecution, and other violence," a collective total "that would amount to the world's 20th most populous country."

This negative influence on global norms and the visible subversion of international law is something that cannot be easily remedied, and the precipitous erosion of democratic and humanitarian practices cannot be easily restored.

When Trump embraces Putin and Kim, but turns his back on children suffering in concentration camps, it sends a strong message to an international community who have been looking to the U.S. as a world leader for decades.

Trump is not the lead we want the rest of the world to follow.

* * *

Naturally, Donald Trump was also terrifying ignorant, again, on the world stage.

After Senator Kamala Harris challenged Joe Biden on his busing record during the first Democratic primary debate, Trump was asked if he views busing as "a viable way of integrating schools," to which he started his response by saying: "Well, it has been something that they've done for a long period of time. I mean, you know, there aren't that many ways that you're going to get people to schools."

At another point, he was asked if he agrees with Putin about decline of "Western-style liberalism," to which he responded by criticizing Los Angeles and San Francisco run, saying they are "sad to look at" because they are "run by liberal people." Yikes.

Adam Serwer notes: "Trump thinks 'Western-style liberalism' refers to liberals on the West Coast, not the form of government of the country he is currently president of."


And, in one final humiliation for the U.S., Trump's daughter, Ivanka Trump, awkwardly tried to insert herself into a group of world leaders discussing world affairs. Edward Luce at the Financial Times describes the scene:
The video, released by the French government, shows varying expressions of tortured politeness as Ms Trump intrudes on a discussion between France's Emmanuel Macron, Britain's Theresa May, Canada's Justin Trudeau and Christine Lagarde, head of the IMF. Ms Lagarde, in particular, was unable to conceal her irritation.

What they were discussing is secondary. Mr Macron made a point about social justice. Mrs May replied that people notice when the economy is brought into it. Ms Trump then interrupted with a non sequitur about how the defence industry is male-dominated.
After which she smiles broadly, totally pleased with herself at what she clearly believes was a trenchant observation, completely oblivious to what an absolute wanker she is. It is absolutely cringe-inducing to behold.


This entire family is a scourge on the nation and on the entire fucking planet.

I don't know what else needs to be or even could be said at this point. Impeach Trump. Remove his entire regime. It is, truly, of global importance and the utmost urgency.

Open Wide...

The Collusion Is Still Happening Right out in the Open

Earlier, I shared video of Donald Trump with Vladimir Putin at the G20, jokingly waggling his finger at him while grinning and telling him not to meddle in our election. Here it is again, for anyone who missed it:


Olga Lautman observed that Trump has never seemed so happy to see anyone in his life as when Putin walked into the room:


Trump also "bonded with Putin over a scorn for journalists."


As Sarah Kendzior noted about this stomach-churning exchange: "Every access journalist and sycophantic pundit legitimizing Trump is digging their own grave while spitting on the graves of the journalists who've been murdered."

That — and abetting the brazen co-conspirators who continue to openly collude to destroy the U.S. democracy.

One of whom is the sitting U.S. president.

Open Wide...

Today in Rampaging Authoritarianism

1. Donald Trump believes that what he and his Kremlin puppet-master talk about is none of our fucking business:

"I'll have a very good conversation with him. What I say to him is none of your business.
As Leah McElrath says: "Well, yeah, it is our f*cking business, you traitorous ass." She also urges: "Look at the expression in his eyes when he says this." Shiver.

2. Senator Lindsey Graham tweets about the Democratic debate:


Just a sitting senator "joking" about how the sitting president should become a dictator and punctuating it with a smiley face.

JFC.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 888

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Late yesterday and earlier today by me: Keep Expecting MORE, Because It's Who You Are and Nativist Wreck Mark Morgan Appointed Acting Commissioner of Customs and Border Protection and Primarily Speaking.

Here are some more things in the news today...

[Content Note: Nativism; abuse]


I think we can all agree that if sitting senators are being disallowed from scrutinizing the conditions at "detention facilities" across the country, the situation is even more grim than we have imagined. Sob.

Rachael Bade, Matt Zapotosky, and Karoun Demirjian at the Washington Post: Mueller to Testify to Congress in Open Session About His Investigation. "Former special counsel Robert S. Mueller III will testify to Congress in a public session next month about his investigation of Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential campaign and possible obstruction of justice by [Donald] Trump, a reluctant witness long sought by House Democrats. The House Judiciary and Intelligence committees, in an announcement late Tuesday, said that 'pursuant to a subpoena,' Mueller has agreed to appear before both panels on July 17."

For fuck's sake, he should be testifying now. He shouldn't even have had to be subpoenaed to say whatever he knows, even at his own personal risk. There are people dying in concentration camps and out in the open along the southern border, and if that isn't urgent enough to light a fire under this guy's ass, then nothing ever will.

Meanwhile, Donald Trump now has nearly a month to leverage the power of his office to try to discredit (and publicly intimidate) Mueller, which naturally has already begun.


I'm not even going to attempt a transcript of that spittle-flecked nonsense. All you need to know is that Trump, on the phone live with Fox News, just accused Mueller, without evidence, of having deleted incendiary emails and texts between his team members (Lisa Page and Peter Strzok) in order to try to frame Trump for collusion.

He is unhinged, and it is frightening.

In addition to the fact that Trump is abusing his bully pulpit to try to discredit a federal investigator, i.e. obstruction, one thing that strikes me about this is that, unlike lots of times when Trump is obviously just lying to manipulate the press and his base, and you can hear the smugness in his voice indicating his delight at getting away with it, here he sounds authentically paranoid.

Which makes him way more dangerous, for a start, and also suggests he is truly losing what precious little mental stability he ever had.

We are in so much trouble.

During the same 45-minute phone call to Fox News, because the president has nothing better to do (as Mike Pence, Mike Pompeo, John Bolton, Stephen Miller, and Jared Kushner are running the country), Trump also further laid the groundwork for refusing to accept the 2020 election results (in the event he doesn't win):


He also made another reference to how he doesn't leave yesterday, in the context of a possible war with Iran, but the subtext once again wasn't very sub:


And the rampaging authoritarianism rampages onward...

Jamie Ross at the Daily Beast: NSA Collected U.S. Phone Records without Authorization — Again. "The National Security Agency has once again collected records about U.S. calls and text messages that it wasn't authorized to obtain, according to a report from The Wall Street Journal. In a second such incident, the NSA wrongly collected the numbers and time stamps of calls and text messages in October of last year — though it reportedly didn't obtain the content of the conversations. The documents showing the previously undisclosed move were obtained by the American Civil Liberties Union."

Jennifer Jacobs and Daniel Flatley at Bloomberg: Trump's Protocol Chief Is Quitting Just Before the G-20 Summit. "The Trump administration official in charge of diplomatic protocol plans to resign and isn't going to Japan for this week's Group of 20 meetings, where he would have played a sensitive behind-the-scenes role, according to people familiar with the matter. Sean Lawler, a State Department official whose title is chief of protocol, is departing amid a possible inspector general's probe into accusations of intimidating staff and carrying a whip in the office, according to one of the people." Fucking hell.


[CN: White supremacy; nativism] Richard L. Hasen at Slate: The Census Case Is Shaping Up to Be the Biggest Travesty Since Bush v. Gore. "The government's conduct in the pending Supreme Court case about adding a citizenship question to the census has gone from indefensible to outrageous. In the case, which is likely to be decided this week, Solicitor General Noel Francisco on Tuesday asked the Supreme Court to become complicit in a cover-up of discriminatory activity by doing something the court does not and cannot do: decide a legal issue that is not before it. If the court does so, any pretense of the legitimacy of the decision will be gone."

ICYMI yesterday: Stephanie Grisham, who is Melania Trump's communications director, will replace Sarah Huckabee Sanders as White House Press Secretary. The pool from which Trump is willing to draw his authoritarian sycophants keeps getting smaller and smaller — and Grisham seems like a real peach...

Antonia Noori Farzan at the Washington Post: New White House Press Secretary Yanked Arizona Reporters' Access After Critical Coverage. "Grisham asked members of the Arizona press corps to consent to what Stephenson called an 'invasive' background check into reporters' addresses, driving records, and criminal and civil histories. Journalists could decline, but if they did, they would be banned from the state's House floor, which was the only place to reliably buttonhole lawmakers."

So there's a new White House Press Secretary who has a history of punishing reporters for critical coverage and meanwhile reporters are partying with the outgoing Press Secretary, because everything is terrible:


So, if the Republicans in Congress are unwilling to hold Donald Trump accountable for anything, and the Special Counsel seems inclined to testify only to distance himself from the appearance of doing nothing while migrant children die, and a significant portion of the political press has their mouths too full of cake from a party with White House Nazis to speak truth to power, is there any glimmer of hope that Trump will face consequences for anything ever?

Well, here's one glimmer: A judge has ruled that Democrats' suit against Trump for violations of the emolument clause can move forward. The House Judiciary Democrats have a statement on the important ruling here.

Hold onto that glimmer as we move to this final bit...

[CN: Sexual violence] In a great piece for Slate on E. Jean Carroll's rape accusation against Donald Trump, Lili Loofbourow writes: "Of the allegations against Trump, Carroll's is among the most serious, and while she isn't the first to publish a first-person account (Natasha Stoynoff did, too) her approach is startlingly frank. ...By not saying the ordinary or expected things, Carroll tells the story of her rape differently. The lack of coverage it received despite or because of her efforts is evidence that survivors understand perfectly well that there are no good options."

And it is not just the lack of coverage that is a scandal all its own, despite Carroll's brave telling: Only two Republican Senators, Joni Ernst (herself a survivor) and Mitt Romney, have said the allegation should be investigated; others are saying flatly that they disbelieve her and/or are engaging in rank rape apologia; and one Democratic member of Congress, Rep. Jackie Speier, has called for a formal investigation but "questions remain over which committee might have jurisdiction over such a matter."

I said many times during the 2016 election that the contest between a history-making feminist female candidate and a confessed serial sex abuser was a referendum on how the United States values women. And we certainly have our answer.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 883

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Late yesterday and earlier today by me: Putin Weighs in on Iran and Migrant Children Being Kept in Appalling Conditions and Primarily Speaking.

Here are some more things in the news today...

Erin Cunningham, Missy Ryan, and Dan Lamothe at the Washington Post: Trump Ordered Attack on Iran for Downing Drone, Then Called It Off, Citing Casualties.
[Donald] Trump ordered an attack on Iran on Thursday in retaliation for the downing of a surveillance drone in the Strait of Hormuz but called the operation off just before it was due to occur because it would have caused extensive casualties, he said Friday.

In a series of morning tweets, Trump said he called off strikes on three Iranian sites minutes before they were to be launched because he was informed of the likely loss of life among Iranians.

"We were cocked & loaded to retaliate last night on 3 different sights when I asked, how many will die," Trump tweeted. "150 people, sir, was the answer from a General. 10 minutes before the strike I stopped it."

Such a death toll was "not proportionate to shooting down an unmanned drone," Trump wrote, adding: "I am in no hurry, our Military is rebuilt, new, and ready to go, by far the best in the world. Sanctions are biting & more added last night. Iran can NEVER have Nuclear Weapons, not against the USA, and not against the WORLD!"

Trump's Friday morning tweets appeared to gloss over the fact that he was the one, as commander in chief, who had ordered the retaliation against Iran in the first place.
Unless he wasn't.

What kind of president only asks after ordering a military strike how many potential casualties there would be? The kind of president whose warmongering advisors are potentially the ones who really ordered the strike and the kind of president who needs a bullshit excuse to explain why he ended up stopping it after his puppet-master gave a public order to stand down.

I mean, are we really meant to believe that Donald Trump cares about sparing lives when he's actively facilitating the deaths of children in his concentration camps? Please. Donald Trump doesn't do anything out of compassion.

* * *

[Content Note: Video may autoplay at link] Olivia Gazis at CBS News: Justice Department Review of Intel in Russia Probe Fuels Fears of Politicization. "A mix of concern, confusion, and defiance has spread through elements of the intelligence community as a murky picture emerges of Attorney General William Barr's review of its investigative and analytical work on Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. In particular, current and former intelligence officials are questioning the purpose and propriety of the attorney general's intention, first reported by The New York Times, to enlist John Durham, the U.S. attorney for the District of Connecticut, in scrutinizing the analytical judgments that led a group of agencies to conclude that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign to boost then-candidate Trump's electability."

Absolutely chilling. This is straight-up intimidation of the intelligence community. They are no longer allowed to be patriots; they must only be loyal to Donald Trump.

Jamie Ross at the Daily Beast: Trump Threatened Time Magazine Reporter with Prison over Photo of Kim Jong Un Letter. "Donald Trump freaked out and threatened a Time magazine reporter with prison after the publication's photographer apparently tried to take a snap of a letter sent to him by Kim Jong Un. Trump reportedly asked to go off-the-record while he showed off the letter to reporters, but then became enraged after the photographer appeared to try to capture it. 'Excuse me— Under Section II— Well, you can go to prison instead, because, if you use, if you use the photograph you took of the letter that I gave you... Confidentially, I didn't give it to you to take photographs of it, so don't play that game with me,' the president is quoted as saying in the transcript."

This would have been unthinkable during another administration. This and the item above demonstrate how far removed we are from anything resembling normalcy in under three years of Trump's presidency.

Tierney Sneed at TPM: Will a Trump Trade Move Create an Election Mess for Overseas U.S. Voters?
The Trump administration has supported plenty of moves to make it harder to vote. But an under-the-radar action [Donald] Trump took last year, as part of his trade war with China, may be a case of him just stumbling into that outcome, election experts fear.

Trump is threatening to withdraw from the international body that oversees global mail delivery, putting at risk the stability and reliability of the current system of sending and receiving mail internationally.

Any disruption to the international postal service, voter advocates say, could make an already difficult process of casting ballots for Americans abroad even more complicated. Among those who stand to be affected are members of the military overseas, whose ability to vote while serving their country has always been a politically sensitive issue.
Yeah, so, I'm not inclined to pretend that this was an accident, nor that Trump just happened to "stumble" into yet another way to suppress the vote of a population highly likely to vote against him in large numbers. This is more of the Republican Party's overt democracy-killing fuckery. Goddammit.

* * *

[CN: Nativism; abuse] Renée Feltz at Rewire.News: 'Willful Recklessness': Trump Pushes for Indefinite Family Detention. "With the 2020 election approaching, the Trump administration is taking steps to extend the detention of migrant families despite documented concerns from the medical community — including two doctors under federal contract to monitor the facilities where migrant families are held. ...The administration has buttressed its push to detain more families by arguing that few of them show up for their immigration court hearings if they are released." But that is a damnable lie: "Almost six out of every seven families released from custody had shown up for their initial court hearing."

Exactly one year ago, I warned that indefinite family detention was the objective. And here we are. FUCK.

David A. Fahrenthold, Josh Dawsey, Jonathan O'Connell, and Michelle Ye Hee Lee at the Washington Post: When Trump Visits His Clubs, Government Agencies and Republicans Pay to Be Where He Is. "In all, his scores of trips have brought his private businesses at least $1.6 million in revenue, from federal officials and GOP campaigns who pay to go where Trump goes, according to a Washington Post analysis. They gave Trump valuable marketing opportunities — to showcase his opulent properties on an international stage. Trump's preference for his own properties also has reshaped the GOP fundraising schedule, with benefits for the Trump Organization. About one-third of all the political fundraisers or donor meetings that Trump has attended — 23 out of 63 — have taken place at his own properties."

This should be a fucking scandal, and instead it's a blip. It's a profound, brazen violation of the emoluments clause, and Trump should be impeached for this self-enrichment alone, no less everything else he's doing.

I don't know where else to put this, so I'm just going to put it here:


And finally... [CN: Sexual harassment and abuse] Josh Israel at ThinkProgress: Roy Moore, Accused Child Molester and Twice-Removed Judge, Announces 2020 Senate Run. Fucking goblin.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

Putin Weighs in on Iran

Russian President Vladimir Putin gave a highly theatrical Q&A today, during which he said the following about the possibility of a U.S.-Iran war: "We don't want this. ...It would be a catastrophe for the region, because it would lead to a spike in violence and a number of refugees from the region."

Well. That certainly explains why Donald Trump has cooled to the idea of war with Iran, despite Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and National Security Advisor John Bolton banging the drums.

Hours later, during a joint press conference with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Trump said of Iran shooting down a U.S. drone: "I think probably Iran made a mistake. I would imagine it was a general or somebody that made a mistake in shooting that drone down. ...I have a feeling that it was a mistake made by somebody that shouldn't have been doing what they did. I think they made a mistake. ...I find it hard to believe it was intentional, if you want to know the truth. I think that it could have been somebody who was loose and stupid that did it. We'll be able to report back, and you'll understand exactly what happened. But it was a very foolish move. That I can tell you."

Sure. And you know how famously forgiving Trump is of people who make mistakes.

(At the same press conference, Trudeau trolled Trump by coughing, a clear reference to Trump kicking White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney out of the Oval Office when he coughed during an interview.)

So, the collusion continues to happen right out in the open.

And, just to be clear: I don't believe that Putin is legitimately advocating against a war that would destabilize a region he has been actively trying to destabilize to create opportunities for him and his oligarch cronies to exploit.

I do believe he wants this to be his — and Trump's — public position, at least for the time being. For whatever reason.

It would be great if the media would report anything Putin says about foreign policy with the disclaimer that Putin often says one thing publicly and is orchestrating something to the absolute contrary in secret.

The public should know that they can never take what Putin says at face value.

After all, this is the same person who has repeatedly claimed that the Kremlin did not interfere in the 2016 presidential election. And we all know that is a goddamned lie.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 879

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Earlier today by me: Today in Rampaging Authoritarianism and Primarily Speaking and Some Good News from SCOTUS.

Here are some more things in the news today...

Bozorgmehr Sharafedin at Reuters: Iran Says It Dismantled a U.S. Cyber Espionage Network. (Emphasis on "says.") "Iran said on Monday it had exposed a large cyber espionage network it alleged was run by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and that several U.S. spies had been arrested in different countries as the result of this action. ...The secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, Ali Shamkhani, said on Monday: 'One of the most complicated CIA cyber espionage networks that had an important role in the CIA's operations in different countries was exposed by the Iranian intelligence agencies a while ago and was dismantled.' ...He did not specify how many CIA agents were arrested and in what countries."

Nasser Karimi and Jon Gambrell at the AP: Iran Says It Will Break Uranium Stockpile Limit in 10 Days. "Iran will break the uranium stockpile limit set by Tehran's nuclear deal with world powers in the next 10 days, the spokesman for the country's atomic agency said Monday while also warning that Iran could enrich uranium up to 20% — just a step away from weapons-grade levels. The announcement by Behrouz Kamalvandi, timed for a meeting of EU foreign ministers in Brussels, puts more pressure on Europe to come up with new terms for Iran's 2015 nuclear deal. The deal has steadily unraveled since the Trump administration pulled America out of the accord last year."

Aaron David Miller at USA Today: Why Are We Headed for a Blowup with Iran? It Began When Trump Scrapped the Nuclear Deal.
The Iranian regime is authoritarian, ideological, and repressive, a serial human rights abuser and regional troublemaker. But we now find ourselves in a dangerous situation largely as a result of a great unraveling begun by the Trump administration's unilateral decision last year to withdraw from the 2015 Iran nuclear agreement.

The accord — known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) — was flawed, to be sure, and didn't address Iran's aggressive regional behavior or its ballistic missile programs. Even so, it was still a highly functional arms control agreement that imposed significant constraints on Iran's nuclear program for at least for a decade or more.

Campaigning hard against the agreement, candidate Trump vowed to renegotiate or leave what he deemed the worst agreement ever negotiated. Then as president, he pulled out of the agreement and launched his "maximum pressure" campaign. The administration reimposed sanctions on banking and petrochemicals and, in the past several months, has made a major effort to reduce Iran's lifeblood — its oil exports — to zero. As intended, all of this has wreaked havoc on the Iranian economy.

Not surprisingly, the regime, which the Iranian foreign minister quipped had a Ph.D. in sanctions busting, signaled through mine attacks on six oil tankers in the past month that it had options, too. Within hours of Thursday's attacks, oil prices spiked.

No matter how egregious the regime's behavior in other areas, pulling out of the JCPOA without a Plan B other than "maximum pressure" has more than any other factor brought us where we are today.
Well, that and the fact that Donald Trump and his advisors actively want a war with Iran.

As, it appears, does Vladimir Putin. Olga Lautman notes on Twitter: "While tensions are heating up with Iran Russian Energy Minister Alexander Novak is in Iran holding talks with Iran's oil minister."

I strongly suspect the Kremlin is trying to orchestrate a U.S.-Iran war. A war that it won't even have to fight:


* * *

[Content Note: Racism; nativism. Covers entire section.]

Oliver Laughland at the Guardian: How Trump's Census Question Could Transform America's Electoral Map. "For the first time, the census could include a question on respondents' citizenship that, according to the bureau's own research, will substantially reduce the number of people willing to participate. A study published last week estimated that the addition of the question could mean up to 4 million people — mostly people of color from immigrant minority communities — could go uncounted. If such an undercount occurs the effects will be profound. It could allow for electorate boundaries throughout America to be redrawn, almost certainly favouring the Republican party. It could result in billions of dollars in federal funds being withheld from some of the most vulnerable communities in America."

Rebekah Entralgo at ThinkProgress: Census Battle over Citizenship Question Leaves Immigration Activists with Their Hands Tied.
The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to rule on the constitutionality of the the citizenship question by the end of the month, but not before the Census Bureau launched a test last Thursday to examine how its inclusion will impact responses. Approximately 480,000 housing units around the country will receive a questionnaire with households randomly assigned to one of two versions of the questionnaire: one with the citizenship question included, the other without. These results are expected to be completed by October.

So where does that leave the groups that advocate on behalf of immigrants and want to ensure their community members are counted? For now at least, their hands are tied.

Many people are not aware of the census in the first place, and a tremendous amount of resources is spent on outreach and keeping communities informed. With the citizenship question in limbo until at least the end of June, that reduces the amount of time groups can provide outreach.

"We are waiting to see what happens and then we'll decide accordingly," Zahra Billoo, executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations' (CAIR) San Francisco Bay office told ThinkProgress. "I tell my staff we are planning to encourage participation in the census the same way we did in 2010. Because it's really important that all of these communities be counted. This matters now and well beyond this president's time in office."

But, Billoo emphasizes, that's not to say she isn't extremely hesitant.

"We recognize, of course, that we could not discourage participation in the census," she added. "The option isn't discourage versus encourage. It is neutral or silent versus encourage. Because even though I do want my community to be counted, it would also weigh heavily on me if I weren't confident in the safety, security, and secrecy of the census data."
Amelia Thomson-DeVeaux at FiveThirtyEight: The Citizenship Question Could Cost California and Texas a Seat in Congress. "The results of the count determine everything from where grocery stores are placed to how congressional representatives are distributed. There are few things we care more about around here than political apportionment (although, if we're being honest, we care an awful lot about groceries, too). So we went in search of researchers who had estimated the potential effect of the citizenship question. We found several, none of whom agreed on just how big an impact this would have. But they were all on the same page about one thing — if the Supreme Court rules that the new question can be included, it could alter our political future."

* * *

Kate Riga at TPM: On Heels of Conway Rec, Dems Call for Probe into Kushner for Hatch Violations. Just days after the Office of Special Counsel recommended that White House counselor Kellyanne Conway be fired for violating the Hatch Act, Reps. Ted Lieu (D-CA) and Don Breyer (D-VA) are calling for Jared Kushner to be investigated as well. 'As you know, under the Hatch Act, federal employees are prohibited from fundraising for political candidates,' they wrote to the Office of Special Counsel. 'Alarmingly, recent media reports indicate that Mr. Kushner is nonetheless taking a direct role in raising funds for the re-election campaign of [Donald] Trump.'"

This is the right thing to do, because ethics and rules still matter. But nothing will come of it. Kellyanne Conway and Jared Kushner will not be fired. Members of the Trump administration won't stop violating the Hatch Act. The only result will be that that the Trump administration is further empowered by having visibly broken the law and gotten away with it (again). Which underlines the urgency of impeaching him now.

Rachael Bade at the Washington Post: Push to Impeach Trump Stalls Amid Democrats' Deference to — and Fear of — Pelosi. "As pressure has mounted in recent weeks on House Democrats to move more aggressively against Trump, Pelosi has demonstrated the firm grip she wields over her caucus — quashing, at least for now, the push for impeachment. It is a command that colleagues say is drawn from a deep well of respect for the political wisdom of the most powerful woman in American politics — and fear that challenging her comes with the risk of grave cost to one's career."

Care more about the entire country than your careers, Democrats. For fuck's sake.

If we wanted opportunistic careerists who didn't give a flying fuck about the nation's future, we could just vote for Republicans. Get a goddamned grip.

* * *

[CN: Misogyny; racism] Isabella Dally-Steele at Ms.: This Week in Trump's War on Women. "On Tuesday, Politico revealed that claims of racism and sexism in the Treasury Department, which came to a head after Secretary Steve Mnuchin's decision to delay the historic rebranding of the $20 bill by changing out Andrew Jackson's image for Harriet Tubman's until at least 2026, were spot on. Nancy Cook revealed that the department's lack of diversity is much more than skin deep — with only three women and one person of color in Department's 20-person senior staff and an overwhelmingly white, male boys club culture permeating the workplace. 'For women and people of color,' said one of Cook's sources, a former Treasury official, 'there is just a general feeling when you walk in and there are all white men that it is not a comfortable environment.'"

[CN: Sexual assault; war on agency] Staff at AP: Ex-Pastor in Texas Accused of Sexually Abusing Teen Relative. "A former Southern Baptist pastor who supported legislation in Texas that would have criminalized abortions has been arrested on charges of child sex abuse, accused of repeatedly molesting a teenage relative over the course of two years." Men who object to women's right of consent over our own bodies when it comes to healthcare frequently don't care about our right of consent in any circumstance.

[CN: Misogyny] Sam Stein at the Daily Beast: Exclusive Poll Reveals Dems' Sexism Problem in 2020.
Sexism is weighing down the women running for the Democratic presidential nomination, a new public opinion survey conducted by Ipsos for The Daily Beast reveals.

A full 20 percent of Democratic and independent men who responded to the survey said they agreed with the sentiment that women are "less effective in politics than men." And while 74 percent of respondents claimed they were personally comfortable with a female president, only 33 percent believed their neighbors would be comfortable with a woman in the Oval Office.

That latter number, explained Mallory Newall, research director at Ipsos, was a strong tell about how gender dynamics were souring voters on certain candidates. Asking respondents how they believe their neighbors feel about an issue is "a classic method to get around people being reluctant to admit to less popular views."
Jesus fucking Jones, dudes. Get your shit together.

* * *

Jaclyn Jeffrey-Wilensky at NBC News: Without Swift Action on Climate Change, Heat Waves Could Kill Thousands in U.S. Cities. "If global warming sometimes seems like a distant or abstract threat, new research casts the phenomenon in stark, life-or-death terms. It predicts that in the absence of significant progress in efforts to curb emissions of temperature-raising greenhouse gases, extreme heat waves could claim thousands of lives in major U.S. cities. If the global average temperature rises 3 degrees Celsius (5.4 degrees Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial levels — which some scientists say is likely if nations honor only their current commitments for curbing emissions — a major heat wave could kill almost 6,000 people in New York City. Similar events could kill more than 2,500 in Los Angeles and more than 2,300 in Miami."

Brian Kahn at Earther: Half of Greenland's Surface Started Melting This Week, Which Is Not Normal. "Greenland has been scorching (by Greenland standards) for the past few days, with temperatures rising 10-20 degrees Celsius (18-36 degrees Fahrenheit) above normal across the island. Ruth Mottram, a climate scientist with the Danish Meteorological Institute, told Earther that the weather station at the top of the ice sheet saw temperatures reach above freezing on Wednesday and they were headed that way again on Thursday. That puts them just a degree or so away from setting the all-time heat record for June, which is currently held by June 2012."

Erin McCormick, Bennett Murray, Carmela Fonbuena, Leonie Kijewski, Gökçe Saraçoğlu, Jamie Fullerton, Alastair Gee, and Charlotte Simmonds at the Guardian: Where Does Your Plastic Go? Global Investigation Reveals America's Dirty Secret.
What happens to your plastic after you drop it in a recycling bin?

According to promotional materials from America's plastics industry, it is whisked off to a factory where it is seamlessly transformed into something new.

This is not the experience of Nguyễn Thị Hồng Thắm, a 60-year-old Vietnamese mother of seven, living amid piles of grimy American plastic on the outskirts of Hanoi. Outside her home, the sun beats down on a Cheetos bag; aisle markers from a Walmart store; and a plastic bag from ShopRite, a chain of supermarkets in New Jersey, bearing a message urging people to recycle it.

Tham is paid the equivalent of $6.50 a day to strip off the non-recyclable elements and sort what remains: translucent plastic in one pile, opaque in another.

A Guardian investigation has found that hundreds of thousands of tons of U.S. plastic are being shipped every year to poorly regulated developing countries around the globe for the dirty, labor-intensive process of recycling. The consequences for public health and the environment are grim.
This is a must-read report.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 854

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Late yesterday and earlier today by me: An Observation and A Sixth Child Died in U.S. Custody and Primarily Speaking.

Here are some more things in the news today...

Let me start with some GOOD resistance news and by saying once again that I love Stacey Abrams! Jonathan Easley at the Hill: Abrams: 'Identity Politics Is Exactly Who We Are and Exactly How We Won'.
Former Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams on Wednesday urged Democrats to embrace identity politics, at a time when the issue has become a source of debate within the party.

Speaking at the Center for American Progress's Ideas Conference, Abrams warned that the term "identity politics" had been twisted by those aiming to silence emergent minority voters seeking political power for the first time.

"The notion of identity politics has been peddled for the past 10 years and it's been used as a dog whistle to say we shouldn't pay too much attention to the voices coming into progress," Abrams said. "I would argue that identity politics is exactly who we are and exactly how we won."

The Georgia Democrat argued that identity politics had "brought new folks to the process," and that a failure to focus on racial differences would give minority voters the impression "they have no reason to engage and no reason to show up."

"When I hear Democratic candidates, progressive candidates, American candidates decrying the identity of their voters, I'm deeply worried for our democracy," Abrams said.
Me too, Stacey Abrams. Me too.

* * *

Lots of pieces like this today...

Jennifer Rubin at the Washington Post: Pelosi Goads Trump into Another Temper Tantrum.

John Bresnahan and Burgess Everett at Politico: Why Pelosi Is So Good at Infuriating Trump.

[Content Note: Video may autoplay at link] Glenn Thrush at the New York Times: Pelosi Pushes Go-Slow Strategy on Impeachment as She Goads Trump.

Great. Yes. Sure. Nancy Pelosi is absolutely the best at getting under Donald Trump's skin. I agree wholeheartedly with that! Except, as I tweeted yesterday:


That tweet quickly went viral, and, as of this writing, has more than 1,600 retweets and 8,600 likes.

I find it very interesting that Pelosi specifically used the word "villainous" in her press conference today after that tweet went wide yesterday and this morning. And did so while pointedly not addressing the criticism I was making.

At the presser, she also continued to defend her decision to not pursue impeachment at this time:

CNN's Manu Raju: Yesterday you said that the president may have engaged in impeachable offenses—

Pelosi: Yeah.

Raju: —yet today you're saying you're not on a path to impeachment. Can you explain why you're imposed to launching an impeachment inquiry, as many of your members want to do?

Pelosi: Let me be really very clear: The president's behavior, in terms of his obstruction of justice, the things that he is doing, it's very clear; it's in plain sight; it cannot be denied. Ignoring subpoenas, obstruction of justice — yes, these could be impeachable offenses.

But I intend not— [stammers] If— Where the facts— We— There are three things— You might understand it better if you remember these three things: We want to follow the facts, to get the truth to the American people, with a recognition — two — that no one is above the law, and — three — that the president is engaged in a cover-up. And that is what my statement is.

Now how we deal with it is a decision that our caucus makes, and our caucus is very much saying, whatever we do, we need to be ready when we do it.

And I do think that impeachment is a very divisive place to go in our country. And what we can get the facts to the American people through our investigation, it may take us to a place that is unavoidable in terms of impeachment — or not. But we're not at that place.
I just really disagree with this strategy. I firmly believe that every tool in the toolbox, including and especially the enhanced investigative powers of an impeachment process, because every day that Donald Trump is unconstrained with the immense power of the office he holds, empowered and protected by his party, is a dangerous day. Not just for the United States, but the world.

I mean:

Dan De Luce, Courtney Kube, and Abigail Williams at NBC News: Senate Dem. Warns Trump Could Push Through Saudi Bomb Deal without Congressional Approval.

Adrienne Mahsa Varkiani at ThinkProgress: Senate Committee Rejects Proposal to Require Congressional Approval before U.S. Strike on Iran.

Reshma Kapadia at Barron's: The Trade War Jeopardizes a Potential Global Economic Recovery, IMF Says.

Et cetera ad infinitum. How much longer are we supposed to wait? Donald Trump's presidency is pretty fucking "divisive," too.

* * *

Zachary Cohen and Caroline Kelly at CNN: Tillerson Told Lawmakers Putin Was More Prepared Than Trump in Germany Meeting. "Former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson told lawmakers that Russian President Vladimir Putin was more prepared than [Donald] Trump for their meeting in Hamburg, Germany, putting U.S. officials at a disadvantage, a Democratic House Foreign Affairs committee aide told CNN Wednesday." Yeahhhhh I don't think Putin's and Trump's respective "preparedness" was the primary thing putting U.S. officials at a disadvantage there.

Casey Michel at ThinkProgress: New Indictment Says Manafort's Banker Tried to Bribe His Way into Trump Administration. "A bombshell indictment released Thursday from the Justice Department detailed how banker Stephen Calk tried to use his financial ties to former Trump campaign chair Paul Manafort to bribe his way into the Trump administration. According to the indictment, Calk has been charged with 'financial institution bribery' for trying to use his position as the head of the Federal Savings Bank of Chicago, which issued 'millions of dollars in high-risk loans' to Manafort, to obtain 'a senior position' for himself within the Trump administration." Sounds about right.

Leigh Ann Caldwell and Alex Moe at NBC News: Wells Fargo, TD Bank Have Already Given Trump-Related Financial Documents to Congress. "Wells Fargo and TD Bank are the two of nine institutions that have so far complied with subpoenas issued by the House Financial Services Committee demanding information about their dealings with the Trump Organization, according to the sources. ...Wells Fargo provided the committee with a few thousand documents and TD Bank handed the committee a handful of documents, according to a source who has seen them. The committee, led by Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., is especially interested in the president's business relationship with Russia and other foreign entities." Get him!

Speaking of Rep. Maxine Waters...


From your lips to Nancy Pelosi's ears, Rep. Waters!

* * *

[CN: War on agency. Covers entire section.]

Ari Bee at Rewire.News: Georgia Democrats: Police 'Stifled Dissent' During Near-Total Abortion Ban Debate.
Heavy police presence defined the legislative battle at the state capitol around Georgia's near-total abortion ban, with pro-choice legislators calling the police presence and tactics "intimidating," charging that Republican legislative leadership used law enforcement to squelch pushback against the extreme measure.

...Rep. Renitta Shannon (D-Decatur) said she witnessed an increase in police presence at the capitol over the past two legislative sessions. But the level of police activity surrounding any debates on HB 481 was strikingly different. She told Rewire.News that police were used to "stifle dissent," and that this sent a clear message.

"Anytime the general public comes to the capitol to say how they feel about a bill, if it's not something that Republicans agree with, they [Republican leadership] immediately sic the police on them," she said.
Rage. Seethe. Boil.

Cameron Joseph at TPM: North Carolina GOP Looks to Ram Through Anti-Abortion Law.
North Carolina state Rep. Sydney Batch (D) had planned to take off work this week as she recovered from a recent mastectomy procedure to treat her breast cancer. Instead, she spent it at the statehouse, making sure Republicans couldn't come up with enough votes to pass new abortion-related restrictions into law.

North Carolina Republicans have been pushing to pass a "born alive" bill that would make it illegal for doctors not to help babies that somehow survived abortions. They're just a handful of votes away from being able to override a recent veto from North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper (D). Republicans put the bill on the legislative calendar for Monday. When it became clear they didn't have the votes, they decided to shelve it and force Batch and the rest of the legislature to return day after day until they have the numbers.

"I was hoping to take three weeks off to recover, but unfortunately I did not have that ability," Batch told TPM about the GOP's latest effort. "When I realized that Monday, [Republicans were] planning to hold the vote it was worth physical sacrifice and pain to come in to vote. It was extremely important for me to vote."

Her presence was needed. Republicans already overrode Cooper's recent veto in the state Senate, and believe they are just three or four votes away from being able to do the same in the state House. If enough Democrats hadn't shown up, they would have been able to ram through the legislation, since all their members attended session on Monday — a rarity in a chamber where members on both sides regularly miss votes.

...Democrats are furious about the bill itself — and accuse North Carolina House Speaker Tim Moore (R) of trying to take advantage of their ailing members to grind down the Democrats until they pick off enough members to pass the legislation.
What horrible fucking people Republican legislators are. JFC.

In some positive news...

Beth Mole at Ars Technica: Anti-Abortion Clinics That Try to Trick Women Face New Google Ad Policy. "Google will roll out a policy next month to crack down on deceptive advertisements dealing with abortion — a topic rife with misleading and false health information. ...Google will now require all advertisers in the United States, Ireland, and the United Kingdom who run abortion-related ads to submit to a pre-certification. The process is intended to identify the types of services that the advertisers provide. All of their subsequent advertising will then be automatically and clearly labeled with either 'Provides abortions' or 'Does not provide abortions.'"

* * *

[CN: Extreme weather; death] Staff at the BBC: Tornadoes Kill at Least Seven People. "Tornadoes have killed at least three people in Missouri, bringing the death toll from twisters across the U.S. Midwest in recent days to seven. ...Those who work in Jefferson City were urged on Thursday to stay at home due to dangerous road conditions in the aftermath of the storm, including toppled trees and power lines. Earlier the U.S. National Weather Service (NWS) issued a rare 'high warning' for severe storms in the region. It said at least 29 tornadoes had been reported in the last 24 hours and more than 170 since Friday. The NWS described the tornado over Jefferson City as 'large and destructive.'"

Many people are without power, are injured, and/or are displaced from their homes. As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to suggest ways to help in comments.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 841

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Late yesterday and earlier today by me: We Still Don't Know Exactly What Happened to Juan de León Gutiérrez and Nativist HUD Plan Will Harm Children and Primarily Speaking.

Here are some more things in the news today...


For fuck's sake.

Kenneth P. Vogel at the New York Times: Rudy Giuliani Plans Ukraine Trip to Push for Inquiries That Could Help Trump.
Rudolph W. Giuliani, [Donald] Trump's personal lawyer, is encouraging Ukraine to wade further into sensitive political issues in the United States, seeking to push the incoming government in Kiev to press ahead with investigations that he hopes will benefit Mr. Trump.

Mr. Giuliani said he plans to travel to Kiev, the Ukrainian capital, in the coming days and wants to meet with the nation's president-elect to urge him to pursue inquiries that allies of the White House contend could yield new information about two matters of intense interest to Mr. Trump.

One is the origin of the special counsel's investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 election. The other is the involvement of former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr.'s son in a gas company owned by a Ukrainian oligarch.

Mr. Giuliani's plans create the remarkable scene of a lawyer for the president of the United States pressing a foreign government to pursue investigations that Mr. Trump's allies hope could help him in his re-election campaign. And it comes after Mr. Trump spent more than half of his term facing questions about whether his 2016 campaign conspired with a foreign power.
This is only the latest piece of Giuliani's campaign to pressure Ukraine to move against Trump's political opponents. As I noted in March:
Ukrainian news is reporting "that the Prosecutor General of Ukraine had a meeting with Giuliani last month. After the meeting the Ukrainian opened an investigation into Clinton/DNC/Ukraine conspiracy allegations."

So, to be clear, the Prosecutor General of Ukraine is opening an investigation into Hillary Clinton — the only one of the major 2016 contenders who didn't work with someone who had worked for Viktor Yanukovych, the then-prime minister of Ukraine and Putin ally, in 2014. Clinton did, however, work with Joel Benenson, who had worked for Yanukovych's opponent, former Parliament speaker Arseniy Yatsenyuk, who became Prime Minister of Ukraine after Yanukovych was ousted in 2014.

And the Ukrainian investigation was opened after the Prosecutor General met with Giuliani last month.

In other words: The president's personal attorney is orchestrating the domestic war on dissidents and the international war on dissidents.
We are in such serious trouble.


Tim Mak at NPR: Documents Detail Meetings of Russians with Treasury, Federal Reserve. "Newly obtained documents describe what happened when two now-infamous Russians took their outreach campaign into the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve in 2015. Alexander Torshin, then a Russian central banker, brought his protégée, Maria Butina, for meetings with senior officials and even sought another with the then-chair of the Fed, the documents confirm. ...Paul Saunders, who was then the executive director of a D.C.-based think tank called the Center for the National Interest, reached out to officials with the Treasury and the Fed to help organize meetings."

Eric Talmadge at the AP: Experts See Russia Fingerprints on North Korea's New Missile. "The three new missiles North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has tested over the past week are eerily familiar to military experts: They look just like a controversial and widely copied missile the Russian military has deployed to Syria and has been actively trying to sell abroad for years. ...The missiles bear a strong resemblance to the Russian-designed Iskander, a short-range, nuclear-capable ballistic missile that has been in the Russian arsenal for more than a decade. 'There are Russian technology fingerprints all over it,' said Marcus Schiller, a leading expert on North Korean missiles who is based in Germany."

As you may recall, I have suggested that the ongoing theater between Trump and Kim Jong Un serves the purposes of Vladimir Putin, and here is further evidence that this entire thing is indeed a ménage à trois.

* * *

David J. Lynch and Damian Paletta at the Washington Post: Trump Doubles Tariffs on $200 Billion of Chinese Imports, Escalating U.S.-China Trade War. "The United States and China hurtled toward a defining moment in their four-decade-old relationship, with financial markets bracing for the outcome of unusually dramatic trade talks in Washington. Negotiators met into the evening on Thursday but failed to avert an increase in U.S. tariffs on $200 billion in Chinese products that took effect at 12:01 a.m. Friday. ...In Beijing, the Commerce Ministry said China 'deeply regrets' the decision to increase the tariffs and 'will have to take necessary countermeasures.'"


Melanie Schmitz at ThinkProgress: Trump's Latest Round of Tariffs Will Hit U.S. Consumers Hard. "Donald Trump's latest round of tariffs went into effect Friday morning, targeting $200 billion worth of Chinese imports and raising duties from 10% to 25%. ...Experts say the hike will likely hit American consumers harder this time around than in the past. '[A 25% duty] needs to be passed on to the consumer. It is just too big to dilute with those other factors,' Jake Parker, vice president of the U.S.-China Business Council, told The Associated Press."

John Harney at Bloomberg: Trump's China Tariffs Could Cost 400,000 Manufacturing Jobs, Group Says. "Donald Trump's higher tariffs on Chinese imports will have 'dire consequences' for U.S. equipment manufacturers and worsen prospects for American farmers and others already reeling from lower commodity prices, an industry trade group warned on Friday. The tariffs will 'drive down exports and suppress job gains for the industry by as much as 400,000 over 10 years. It will also invite China to hit back at American businesses, farmers, communities, and families,' said Kip Eideberg, vice president of government affairs for the Association of Equipment Manufacturers, which represents more than 1,000 U.S. makers of farm, construction and mining machinery."

* * *

[Content Note: White supremacy; racial slurs at link] Matt Shuham at TPM: TPUSA Member at UN Las Vegas 'Removed' from Organization over 'White Power' Video. "Turning Point USA, the Trump-aligned right-wing group trying to make conservatism cool on college campuses, had to deal with yet another incident of racism in its ranks Thursday: a video that showed the president of its University of Nevada, Las Vegas chapter endorsing 'white power.'"

[CN: Displacement; violence] Jamie Ross at the Daily Beast: Violence Forced 10 Million More People from Their Homes in 2018, Says Report. "Conflict forced more than 10 million additional people to leave their homes and live in other parts of their country in 2018—bringing the total number of so-called internally displaced people due to violence to a record high of 41 million, an all-time high. The numbers come from a new report by the Internal Displacement Monitoring Center and the Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC). ...If the number of people displaced from their homes by natural disasters is included, a total of 28 million people were displaced internally in 2018, according to the figures from the report."

28 million and this presidential administration wants us to build a wall and shut our doors.

[CN: War on agency] Bryn Elise Sandberg at the Hollywood Reporter: Four Production Companies Say They Won't Film in Georgia over Abortion Law. "David Simon's Blown Deadline Productions, Killer Films CEO Christine Vachon, and Mark Duplass pledged to no longer shoot in the state as long as the law exists." GOOD. Now do Alabama, because... [CN: Video may autoplay at link] Sanjana Karanth at the Huffington Post: Alabama Lt. Governor Admits State Abortion Ban Is Direct Attempt to End Roe v. Wade.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

Donald Trump Is Voraciously Bloodthirsty

[Content Note: Incitement; warmongering.]

We need to have a blunt conversation about this: Donald Trump wants violence — and he wants it badly.

He wants it at the southern border. He wants it all over the country, in mass shootings that he has no inclination to contain. He wants it at abortion clinics, at the houses of worship of minority religions, directed at marginalized people. He wants it in at least one war theater on which he can put his own name, because the leftover wars of George W. Bush aren't good enough.

I know it is a bold thing to assert, that the President of the United States actively wants violence. But the evidence is in, and it is compelling.

As I have been documenting since August 2016 — when Trump bellowed at a rally: "Hillary wants to abolish, essentially abolish, the Second Amendment. By the way, and if she gets to pick— [boos from audience] If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although, the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don't know." — Trump is waging a campaign of stochastic terrorism.

Stochastic terrorism is "the use of mass communications to incite random actors to carry out violent or terrorist acts that are statistically predictable but individually unpredictable. In short, remote-control murder by lone wolf."

That is: Leverage visibility and influence to dehumanize your enemies and cast them as threats, then sit back and wait for your most radical and/or unstable supporters to take violent action. It helps significantly if you've also leveraged your power to give access to deadly weaponry to as many people as possible.
Last night, Trump gave a speech at a campaign rally in Panama City Beach, Florida, during which he made headlines by "joking" about shooting migrants and refugees at the border.

His "joke" took much the same tone as his "joke" about a Second Amendment solution to Hillary Clinton: "We can't let [border agents] use weapons. We can't. Other countries do; we can't. I wouldn't never do that. But how do you stop these people?" he asked his crowd, one of whom helpfully offered, "Shoot them!" in reply. Trump grins and shakes his head; the audience made excited, appreciative noises. "That's only in the Panhandle you can get away with that statement. Only in the Panhandle!"

He just never knows what the gosh darn solution is to whatever terrible, existential threat about which he's railing — whether it's the specter of Hillary Clinton judicial appointments or his invocation of hordes of criminal invaders at the border — but, gee, maybe his deplorable base has an idea. Do they? Golly, he doesn't approve of violence, nosir, not him, but maybe his crowd has some thoughts...?

It's the same construction. It's an invitation to fill in the heavily pregnant pauses he leaves dangling over his amped-up crowds with the suggestion, the idea, of violence.

That moment is being reported this morning, but, as I noted on Twitter, Aaron Rupar did a video thread of Trump's speech, and a whole bunch of it is structured as stochastic terrorism, not just that one moment.

For instance:

He talked yet again about Hillary Clinton losing the election, knowing damn well it would invite "Lock her up!" chants — which it did. And he stood and basked in the seething chants with a huge, satisfied grin on his face.

He claimed that "Nothing is more dangerous than the Democrats' crazy immigration agenda." Which naturally incited a round of "Build that wall!" chants.

He returned to his June 16, 2015 announcement speech — in which he asserted: "When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best. ...They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists." — reiterating and doubling down on that idea last night: "Do you actually think that the country is giving us their finest? No! No, they're giving us some rough people. I won't say it. If you remember when I made the speech at the base of Trump Tower, I talked about what's happening. I mentioned the word 'rape.' I was absolutely — by the fake news media, they went after — Guess what? That speech was so mild compared to what's actually happening."

He again mocked asylum-seeking people as stooges and liars, and again advanced the same "invasion" conspiracy theory about refugees that motivated the Tree of Life shooter and again claimed that women are being taped up and trafficked across the border.

He again asserted that "Democrats are aggressively pushing late-term abortion, allowing children to be ripped from their mother's womb, right up until the moment of birth."

Each of these talking points are things he repeats along the campaign trail, in interviews, and on Twitter. He's hammering home the ideas that his enemies must be stopped at all costs, that migrants and refugees are dangerous, that the Democrats want open borders and are murdering children.

And then he "jokes" about how he doesn't know how all of these people, all of us, can be stopped.

Meanwhile, after his recent lengthy phone call with Vladimir Putin, Trump has suddenly changed his tune on Venezuela, reportedly justifying his about-face thus:
Trump is questioning his administration's aggressive strategy in Venezuela following the failure of a U.S.-backed effort to oust President Nicolás Maduro, complaining he was misled about how easy it would be to replace the socialist strongman with a young opposition figure, according to administration officials and White House advisers.

The president's dissatisfaction has crystallized around national security adviser John Bolton and what Trump has groused is an interventionist stance at odds with his view that the United States should stay out of foreign quagmires.

Trump has said in recent days that Bolton wants to get him "into a war" — a comment that he has made in jest in the past but that now betrays his more serious concerns, one senior administration official said.
That might be a more convincing excuse for abruptly changing his position after speaking with Putin if Trump weren't fully onboard with Bolton war-shopping in Iran and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo weren't currently in Iraq peddling some bullshit about Iran planning to use proxies to strike U.S. forces there.

This president wants bloodshed. He wants it within our borders and on foreign soil.

I desperately wish that were not the case. I desperately wish that I could fundamentally disagree with Donald Trump on everything, and still not believe him to be a sadistic wreck.

But malice is the agenda. And people are going to get hurt. People are already getting hurt. And dying. Because the president wants it just so.

If Democratic leadership cannot find any other reason to impeach this president, despite the preponderance of compelling rationales, perhaps they will consider the urgency of doing anything and everything to remove this man from office, before even more people end up dead.

Open Wide...