I'm not running for anything*— Chelsea Clinton (@ChelseaClinton) April 25, 2017
*Apparently periodic reminder may mean twice a day reminding https://t.co/xJrYI30j39
Goodness gracious! I've no plans. How much clearer can I be (since you ask for clarity)?*— Chelsea Clinton (@ChelseaClinton) April 25, 2017
*Apparently twice a day reminder was optimistic https://t.co/PBm9eQUbs4
I had a few thoughts about that.
The disparate treatment of Chelsea Clinton vs Ivanka Trump is a perfect example of the movement against smart women. https://t.co/cROdOpTp41— Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) April 25, 2017
As @iamjohnoliver detailed last night, Ivanka is presumed to have positive qualities & competencies for which there are no evidence.— Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) April 25, 2017
By contrast, the absolute worst that can be assumed and asserted about Chelsea Clinton always is.— Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) April 25, 2017
Also: When I say women aren't even allowed to be authorities on our own lives, this shit is exactly what I mean. https://t.co/GZTCQ9zprk— Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) April 25, 2017
If we can't be trusted to know our own minds, how can we possibly be trusted to know anything about anything else?— Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) April 25, 2017
This is simultaneously the most basic and most devastating subversion of respect for women's knowledge. We can't even know ourselves.— Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) April 25, 2017
That is not to suggest, naturally, that Ivanka Trump is not intelligent. But she is not knowledgable, and she is not keenly concerned with facts and reality.
People can be intelligent, and still not be very smart—or wise, if you prefer.
Certainly, central to Ivanka Trump's personal branding is that she is a "brilliant" businesswoman, savvy and cunning, but decidedly not central to her personal branding is that she is a wonky nerdlady armed with solid facts and earned expertise.
To the absolute contrary, central to the entire Trump brand is being "business geniuses" while routinely claiming a lack of knowledge on an array of policy subjects to rationalize their tremendous fuck-ups.
Of course the movement against smart women doesn't target women whose innate intelligence doesn't threaten the status quo, who are armed with talking points and never facts, but instead targets women whose knowledge is used to agitate against privilege.
And whose competency itself indicts the status quo, by highlighting the cavernous disparity of opportunities between the smart women who are outside power centers looking in at the mediocre men running them.
Which is why no matter what indefensible horseshit comes out of Ivanka's mouth, there are large swaths of the political press who will either give it cursory scrutiny or none at all, or actively defend her—while Chelsea Clinton can insist all day every day that she's not running for office, and there are members of the political press who will effectively call her a fucking liar. Because they assert to know her better than she knows herself.