Showing posts with label Today in Misogyny. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Today in Misogyny. Show all posts

Trump Is a F#@king Racist, Part One Zillion in an Endless Series

[Content Note: White supremacy; nativism; misogyny.]

Yesterday, Donald Trump tweeted this racist shit about Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, Rashida Tlaib of Michigan, Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, and Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts:

So interesting to see "Progressive" Democrat Congresswomen, who originally came from countries whose governments are a complete and total catastrophe, the worst, most corrupt and inept anywhere in the world (if they even have a functioning government at all), now loudly......

....and viciously telling the people of the United States, the greatest and most powerful Nation on earth, how our government is to be run. Why don't they go back and help fix the totally broken and crime infested places from which they came. Then come back and show us how....

....it is done. These places need your help badly, you can't leave fast enough. I'm sure that Nancy Pelosi would be very happy to quickly work out free travel arrangements!
As many people have already noted, all four of the congresswomen targeted by Trump are U.S. citizens, so this is just more of the nativist birther shit on which he's made his political name, starting with his birther campaign against President Barack Obama.

I'll come back to that, but I also want to note very clearly that accusing sitting members of Congress of being uppity for having ideas about "how our government is to be run" shows, yet again, Trump's hostility to the most basic notion of the separation of powers. The president doesn't unilaterally run the U.S. government. Congress is a coequal branch which has as much authority over "how our government is to be run" as the executive branch.

Naturally, Reps. Ocasio-Cortez, Tlaib, Omar, and Presley had some thoughts for the president.

Ocasio-Cortez tweeted: "Mr. President, the country I 'come from,' & the country we all swear to, is the United States. ...You are angry because you can't conceive of an America that includes us. You rely on a frightened America for your plunder. You won't accept a nation that sees healthcare as a right or education as a #1 priority, especially where we're the ones fighting for it. Yet here we are. But you know what's the rub of it all, Mr. President? On top of not accepting an America that elected us, you cannot accept that we don't fear you, either."

Tlaib tweeted: "Yo @realDonaldTrump, I am fighting corruption in OUR country. I do it every day when I hold your admin accountable as a U.S. Congresswoman. Detroit taught me how to fight for the communities you continue to degrade & attack. Keep talking, you'll be out of the WH soon. #TickTock"

Omar tweeted: "As Members of Congress, the only country we swear an oath to is the United States. Which is why we are fighting to protect it from the worst, most corrupt and inept president we have ever seen. You are stoking white nationalism because you are angry that people like us are serving in Congress and fighting against your hate-filled agenda."

Pressley, quoting Trump's words, tweeted: "THIS is what racism looks like. WE are what democracy looks like. And we're not going anywhere. Except back to DC to fight for the families you marginalize and vilify everyday."

And of course they got backup from the People's President:


One thing I want to emphasize, again, is that one of the primary reasons Trump currently occupies the White House — and has the attendant platform from which to disgorge this despicable trash — is that lots and lots and lots of people who should have known better treated him like an entertaining joke through most of his candidacy, despite the fact that he launched his political career with a birther campaign and, long before that, was a public racist who had been sued by the Justice Department for housing discrimination and purchased newspaper ads calling for the death of the Central Park Five.

I'm old enough to remember when people who urgently warned that Trump was a dangerous authoritarian racist and misogynist were told to stop being such killjoys and ruining everyone's fun making fun of the silly man with the weird hair.

And the purpose of saying that, once more, at this particular moment is that it's still happening. Even now, even as the sitting president goes after women of color serving in the U.S. congress, engaging in rank nativism and racism and misogyny, asserting his authoritarianism as he demeans them as human beings and demeans the role of U.S. Representatives in federal governance, there are still people who have nothing but jokes.

We need more than fucking jokes. It is long past time to treat Donald Trump with the gravity his bigotry and tyranny deserve.

Open Wide...

Primarily Speaking

image of a cartoon version of me making a grimace face in front of giant typewriter keys labeled CTRL and Z, pictured in front of a patriotic stars-and-stripes graphic, to which I've added text reading: 'The Democratic Primary 2020: Let's do this thing.'

Welcome to another edition of Primarily Speaking, because presidential primaries now begin fully one million years before the election!

[Content Note: Misogyny] This is so fucking infuriating and depressing: "New polling shows how much sexism is hurting the Democratic women running for president."
When we combine six hostile sexism items into a single scale, we get a picture of how sexist Democratic primary voters are compared to other Americans.

...Perhaps unsurprisingly, most Democratic primary voters score lower on hostile sexism than other Americans. But among Democratic primary voters, there's quite a wide range in sexist attitudes. In fact, more than one-fourth of Democratic primary voters score higher than the average American adult on the hostile sexism scale.
Emphasis mine. I'm sure that won't shock anyone who has spent more than 30 seconds paying attention to the misogyny I'm obliged to navigate on the regular. As Aphra_Behn noted: "It's nice to have science, I guess, but they could have just read your mentions for the last 5 years." Lolsob foreverrrrrrr.

Despite misogyny (which will definitely be the title of my memoir), the female senators running for president continue to kick ass.

Senator Amy Klobuchar, a former prosecutor, lays down some facts in response to Labor Secretary Alex Acosta's lies about his involvement in the Epstein case: "The Secretary claims he had to make the deal so the locals wouldn't mess it up. But in the words of the former Palm Beach DA, he is 'rewriting history.' News alert: The feds have a lot of power and can give really long sentences in sex trafficking cases."

Senator Kamala Harris responds to the news that, "for the first time in history, women of color lead 10 of America’s 100 largest cities": "Women and women of color deserve to have a seat at the table where decisions are made — and finally, that's a reality in major cities across our nation."

Senator Elizabeth Warren is telling her own story — "from falling in love and dropping out of college, to chasing my dream of being a public school teacher." She's definitely had an interesting path to being a presidential candidate. I imagine a lot of women can really relate to it.

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand answers 20 questions at Shondaland, and gives not one but two shout-outs to whiskey (hell yeah):
What do you do to take care of yourself? How do you unwind?

I like to exercise as much as possible. Ideally, I like to join my girlfriends for an early morning pilates or yoga class, and when I'm on the road I try to start the day with a 6 a.m. spin class if we can find one, or I just go to whatever hotel gym I'm staying at to lift weights. A good whiskey at the end of the day is always a great way to unwind.

...What is your comfort food?

I stand by whiskey. But will add French fries.
Forget the candidate everyone wants to have a beer with. I want to have whiskey and french fries with Senator Gillibrand!

* * *

In other news...

Senator Cory Booker is once again talking gun violence and reiterating his call for gun licensing: "This is horrifying — and one of the many reasons why we need federal gun safety policies like comprehensive background checks and gun licensing. If you need a license to drive a car then you should need a license to own and operate a firearm."

Former HUD Secretary Julián Castro is talking housing and immigration.

Joe Biden reportedly said in a closed-door meeting with lawmakers that he would "not to hold migrant children in detention centers if elected president," which is a relief, but also: "Biden did not offer any further details on what he exactly he would do with the thousands of young migrants currently housed in facilities run by the federal government and private contractors. The specific changes he would make to the current system of migrant detention also remain unclear." Oh.

Instead of spending $100 million of his personal money on a vanity presidential run, Tom Steyer could spend that money to "restore the voting rights of about 70,000 people in Florida if he wanted to." But wasting it on a bullshit candidacy in a race he'll certainly lose is definitely an option, too.

Mayor Pete Buttigieg has introduced his racial justice plan, which he calls the Douglass Plan, after Frederick Douglass and in a nod to the Marshall Plan, and he is whitemansplaining it very thoroughly:
I think we'll know we're getting somewhere when this is not regarded as some specialty issue that candidates of color talk about or that we only talk about when addressing voters of color. This is a conversation that, frankly, white America needs to have too, because white America needs to face the roots of these inequities and the fact of systemic racism all around us.

I had a challenging conversation with our own police department where, when I talked about systemic racism in addressing officers, many of them felt that it was a personal attack. I need them to understand, especially white officers, the ways in which, no matter how good their intentions might be, that systemic racism is something they in particular need to be conscious of and need to understand how to be part of the solution on. So this is not something that only candidates of color should be talking about — very much to the contrary.
Oh lord. It's not that Buttigieg is necessarily wrong about a lot of stuff, so much as that he is just unprepared, especially to talk about it in sensitive ways.

(And part of it, too, is just my total exhaustion with listening to white men talking about gender and race issues, especially when there are multiple women, including women of color, and men of color running for president who can speak to these issues from a place of authority conferred by lived experience. In the same vein, I respect that Buttigieg has more expertise when speaking to the lives and needs of gay men.)

Like, this tweet in his thread introducing the Douglass Plan is just so weird to me: "If we don't tackle racial injustice in my lifetime, it will upend the American Project in my lifetime. If the Marshall Plan could rebuild Europe, I believe the Douglass Plan could renew America. Text DOUGLASS to 25859 to learn more and join our call for restorative justice." In my lifetime. Twice. What does Pete Buttigieg's lifetime have to do with racial justice? It's so bizarrely self-centered. Which is a chronic problem with his campaign messaging.

Senator Bernie Sanders, meanwhile, is on a real promotional blitz, appearing on Rachel Maddow's show to give a doozy of an interview; penning quite the op-ed for the Washington Post with quite the headline ("The straightest path to racial equality is through the one percent"); and announcing his enemies I MEAN ANTI-ENDORSEMENTS list.

screenshot from Bernie Sanders' website featuring a photo of Bernie speaking outdoors with his finger pointing up in the air, accompanied by a donation button and text reading: 'Anti-Endorsements | 'I ask you to judge me by the enemies I have made.' – President Franklin Roosevelt'
Full Disclosure: I am not on it.

Oh, and he will also be skipping Netroots Nation, because his team thinks that Daily Kos' Markos Moulitsas won't be an unbiased moderator. I don't know if you should be running for president if you can't handle questions from Markos Moulitsas, but okay.

Bill de Blasio is still definitely running for president.

Talk about these things! Or don't. Whatever makes you happy. Life is short.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 893

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Earlier today by me: The Entire Trump Family Is a Global Embarrassment and Primarily Speaking.

Here are some more things in the news today...

Juliet Eilperin, Josh Dawsey, and Dan Lamothe at the Washington Post: Trump Asks for Military Tanks on the Mall as Part of Grandiose July Fourth Event. "The ongoing negotiations over whether to use massive military hardware, such as Abrams tanks or Bradley Fighting Vehicles, as a prop for Trump's 'Salute to America' is just one of many unfinished details when it comes to the celebration planned for Thursday, according to several people briefed on the plan, who requested anonymity to speak frankly." This is authoritarian theater. And it's being reported as though it's all just perfectly normal. It isn't.


[Content Note: Video may autoplay at link] Parmida Mahalli, Nick Paton Walsh, and Tamara Qiblawi at CNN: Iran Exceeds Uranium Caps Set by Nuclear Deal. "Iran's stockpiles of enriched low-grade uranium have exceeded the 300-kilogram limit set in a landmark 2015 nuclear deal, Foreign Minister Javad Zarif said on Monday according to the state-run IRNA news outlet. The move is thought to be Tehran's first major breach of the accord since [Donald Trump withdrew the United States] from the agreement last year."


[CN: White supremacy] Luke Barnes at ThinkProgress: Germany Is Facing a Terrifying Rise in Far-Right Threats. "Together, these incidents highlight the dangerous surge in far-right extremism which Germany is currently facing. That point is further backed up by a report published by the German domestic security agency Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz (BfV) on Friday: The report stated that, while the number of right-wing extremists in the country had remained relatively stable from 2017 to 2018, the number of acts of extreme violence had risen sharply from 28 in 2017 to 48 in 2018. The report added that nearly 13,000 individuals classified as right-wing extremists had been deemed 'violence-orientated.'"


There is a lot in the news about the protests in Hong Kong — as well there should be! — and far less attention is being given to protests around the U.S. against the Trump Regime's immigration horrors, the lack of more coverage of which is very disturbing (and of course by design). There are some stories popping up on my radar, though.

[CN: Nativism; video may autoplay at link] Daniel Moritz-Rabson at Newsweek: Over 30 Jewish Protesters Arrested After Blocking Access to Privately Operated ICE Detention Facility. "Over 30 protesters were arrested on Sunday outside a privately managed ICE detention center in New Jersey, which has been used to hold undocumented immigrants. Those arrested were among dozens of Jews who staged an action at the Elizabeth Detention Center to protest the treatment and detention of undocumented immigrants. Invoking the Holocaust, demonstrators described to the conditions in which immigrants are being held as concentration camps and spoke of the immigrant children who have died while in ICE care. The protesters traveled from cities including Seattle and Boston to attend the protest, which was organized by a decentralized group of Jewish activists, along with members of the immigrant rights group Movimiento Cosecha."

Oren Oppenheim at the Philadelphia Inquirer: Immigrant Allies Call for Justice, Assail Trump Administration Outside Philadelphia ICE Offices. "Donald Trump's threatened mass deportations of undocumented migrants drew more than 100 protesters Monday morning to the sidewalks outside the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement office in Center City, where they vowed they would 'fight back,' as one organizer declared, against a 'violent, racist government's attacks' on foreign-born residents. 'We're here today to send a message to the administration that we are not going to stay quiet.... We are ready to rise up,' said Blanca Pacheco, co-director of the New Sanctuary Movement of Philadelphia, a coalition of faith-based groups that led the demonstration."

Marcheta Fornoff at MPR News: Marchers Protesting Immigration, Border Policies Fill Minneapolis Streets. "A crowd estimated at more than 1,000 people gathered in south Minneapolis on Sunday to protest the Trump administration's immigration and border policies. From the Kmart parking lot at the corner of Nicollet and Lake, they marched — waving banners and cardboard signs, and spanning two city blocks at a time — to the First Universalist Church of Minneapolis. Once there, speakers shared their stories and spoke against the separation of families, threats of deportation, and other federal actions that have made headlines for months."

Oyin Adedoyin at the Baltimore Sun: Hundreds Rally Outside Baltimore's ICE Office in Defense of Immigrants. "Hundreds of Baltimore residents showed to show support for immigrant communities and advocacy groups at the steps of the ICE field office in Hopkins Plaza, calling for the agency to leave the city. ...Baltimore residents from small children to senior citizens stood side by side on a humid summer day as immigrant advocacy representatives shouted words of resistance from a bullhorn. They held up handmade signs with phrases like 'Have compassion' and 'Abolish ICE.'"

Maria Perez at the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Hundreds of Members of Religious Groups Protest Trump Immigration Policies in Milwaukee. "Hundreds of members of faith-based organizations marched Monday outside the Milwaukee office of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to protest against the immigration policies of [Donald] Trump's administration. Holding signs and banners that read 'Classrooms, not cages,' 'Abolish ICE,' or 'Keep families together,' protesters walked and chanted on the sidewalks outside the building. More than 30 religious leaders and faith-based organizations' members blocked for nearly half an hour the garage entrances to the building where, organizers said, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement brings arrested immigrants for processing."

Diane Smith and Jasmine Robinson at the Fort Worth Star-Telegram: They're Still Standing: Why Critics Protesting Trump's Child Detentions Won't Give Up. "[The protesters call] themselves Patriots for the Children. They said they were fighting federal policy that separated immigrant youngsters from fathers, mothers, aunts and grandmothers. They promised to keep protesting until immigrant children were no longer separated from their parents or detained at the southern border. Now, more than a year after they first planted their feet on University Drive, about a dozen protesters continue to take a public stand. 'The issue hasn't gone away and I don't think we should go away until it does,' said Walter Horton, a semi-retired real estate agent who protests every Friday."

Alan Pyke at ThinkProgress: Hundreds Protest Local D.C. Government's Failure to Protect Their Neighbors from ICE. "A crowd of 300 marched through city streets in Washington, D.C., on Saturday in protest of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids that were recently reported in their neighborhood. The rally attracted an all-ages crowd, with toddlers playing in the Columbia Heights fountain as adults listened to brief speeches from clergy and protest organizers in sweltering heat. ...'ICE out of D.C., fuera ICE,' the crowd chanted as it marched. 'No ban, no wall; sanctuary for all.'"

This is just a small selection of local news stories about the protests going on all across the country against Trump's vile nativist agenda. Look for them in your local news. Share them. Raise awareness of this resistance. And the next time you see someone snorting about how people in the U.S. aren't "out in the streets," tell them that people are out in the streets. The more urgent question is why our national press doesn't cover it.

[CN: Nativism; abuse. Covers rest of section.]


Jay Root and Riane Rolden at the Texas Tribune: No Toothbrushes or Showers, Kids Coughing All Night: Migrants Describe Conditions Inside Border Facilities. "'They don't have the humanitarian conditions for people to be there,' said Gary, a 33-year-old migrant from Siguatepeque, Honduras, who would only give his first name. 'There were more than 200 of us in a single cage — seated on the floor, standing, however we could fit.' He said the stench inside overflowing toilets was so bad it made him gag and caused children to vomit. ...U.S. Customs and Border Protection, which includes the Border Patrol, said it could not comment or research any specific allegations unless the Tribune provided the agency with names, alien registration numbers, and times and dates of the alleged treatment."


Julia Ainsley and Jacob Soboroff at NBC News: Agents Feared Riots, Armed Themselves Because of Dire Conditions at Migrant Facility, DHS Report Says.
The government's own internal watchdog warned as far back as May that conditions at an El Paso, Texas, border station were so bad that border agents were arming themselves against possible riots, countering Friday's assertion by a top Trump administration official that reports of poor conditions for migrants were "unsubstantiated."

In an internal report prepared by the Department of Homeland Security's Office of Inspector General and obtained by NBC News, inspectors noted during a May 7 tour of a border station in the El Paso sector that only four showers were available for 756 immigrants, more than half of the immigrants were being held outside, and immigrants inside were being kept in cells maxed out at more than five times their capacity.

...A cell meant for a maximum of 35 held 155 adult males with only one toilet and sink. The cell was so crowded the men could not lie down to sleep. Temperatures in the cells reached over 80 degrees, the report said.

"With limited access to showers and clean clothing, detainees were wearing soiled clothing for days or weeks," the report said.

Medical concerns were also rising during early May, the report found. Agents reported taking sick migrants to the hospital five times a day, treating 75 immigrants for lice in a single day, and trying to quarantine outbreaks of flu, chickenpox, and scabies.
So instead of letting people go, border agents decided to "remained armed in holding areas" rather than put their weapons in lockboxes. Despicable.

[CN: Nativism; racism; misogyny] And it's hard not to believe that border agents aren't hoping for a chance to start shooting when you read filth like this. A.C. Thompson at ProPublica: Inside the Secret Border Patrol Facebook Group Where Agents Joke About Migrant Deaths and Post Sexist Memes.
Members of a secret Facebook group for current and former Border Patrol agents joked about the deaths of migrants, discussed throwing burritos at Latino members of Congress visiting a detention facility in Texas on Monday, and posted a vulgar illustration depicting Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez engaged in oral sex with a detained migrant, according to screenshots of their postings.

In one exchange, group members responded with indifference and wisecracks to the post of a news story about a 16-year-old Guatemalan migrant who died in May while in custody at a Border Patrol station in Weslaco, Texas. One member posted a GIF of Elmo with the quote, "Oh well." Another responded with an image and the words "If he dies, he dies.”"

...Several of the postings reviewed by ProPublica refer to the planned visit by members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, including Ocasio-Cortez and Rep. Veronica Escobar, to a troubled Border Patrol facility outside of El Paso. Agents at the compound in Clint, Texas, have been accused of holding children in neglectful, inhumane conditions.

Members of the Border Patrol Facebook group were not enthused about the tour, noting that Ocasio-Cortez, a Democrat from Queens, had compared Border Patrol facilities to Nazi concentration camps. Escobar is a freshman Democrat representing El Paso.

One member encouraged Border Patrol agents to hurl a "burrito at these bitches." Another, apparently a patrol supervisor, wrote, "Fuck the hoes." "There should be no photo ops for these scum buckets," posted a third member.

Perhaps the most disturbing posts target Ocasio-Cortez. One includes a photo illustration of her engaged in oral sex at an immigrant detention center. Text accompanying the image reads, "Lucky Illegal Immigrant Glory Hole Special Starring AOC."

Another is a photo illustration of a smiling [Donald] Trump forcing Ocasio-Cortez's head toward his crotch. The agent who posted the image commented: "That's right bitches. The masses have spoken and today democracy won."
The story notes that the secret Facebook group has "roughly 9,500 members from across the country." There are around 20,000 border patrol agents who serve in the broader U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency, which means nearly half of them are participating in this secret group.

Clearly, not all of them share the obscene sentiments, since someone took those screenshots and made sure they got to the media. But it is very troubling to think that such a large proportion of border agents, including many who aren't members of the secret Facebook group, are in agreement with what's being said in that space.

We have a president who is actively pursuing nativist malice against migrants and refugees, and he's got a national force of violent xenophobes ready to start shooting given half a chance.

We're in real trouble.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

Today in Misogyny. And Every Day.

Misogynists: Women just aren't equal to men. They just can't do the same things men can. It's science.

Women: *do the same thing men have done*

Misogynists: Eww gross. That isn't ladylike.

Rinse and repeat for fucking ever.

Am I talking about soccer? Yes! Am I talking about running for president? Yes! Am I talking about— Yes! I am talking about all the things, because misogynists run the same playbook in every goddamned situation.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 879

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Earlier today by me: Today in Rampaging Authoritarianism and Primarily Speaking and Some Good News from SCOTUS.

Here are some more things in the news today...

Bozorgmehr Sharafedin at Reuters: Iran Says It Dismantled a U.S. Cyber Espionage Network. (Emphasis on "says.") "Iran said on Monday it had exposed a large cyber espionage network it alleged was run by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and that several U.S. spies had been arrested in different countries as the result of this action. ...The secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, Ali Shamkhani, said on Monday: 'One of the most complicated CIA cyber espionage networks that had an important role in the CIA's operations in different countries was exposed by the Iranian intelligence agencies a while ago and was dismantled.' ...He did not specify how many CIA agents were arrested and in what countries."

Nasser Karimi and Jon Gambrell at the AP: Iran Says It Will Break Uranium Stockpile Limit in 10 Days. "Iran will break the uranium stockpile limit set by Tehran's nuclear deal with world powers in the next 10 days, the spokesman for the country's atomic agency said Monday while also warning that Iran could enrich uranium up to 20% — just a step away from weapons-grade levels. The announcement by Behrouz Kamalvandi, timed for a meeting of EU foreign ministers in Brussels, puts more pressure on Europe to come up with new terms for Iran's 2015 nuclear deal. The deal has steadily unraveled since the Trump administration pulled America out of the accord last year."

Aaron David Miller at USA Today: Why Are We Headed for a Blowup with Iran? It Began When Trump Scrapped the Nuclear Deal.
The Iranian regime is authoritarian, ideological, and repressive, a serial human rights abuser and regional troublemaker. But we now find ourselves in a dangerous situation largely as a result of a great unraveling begun by the Trump administration's unilateral decision last year to withdraw from the 2015 Iran nuclear agreement.

The accord — known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) — was flawed, to be sure, and didn't address Iran's aggressive regional behavior or its ballistic missile programs. Even so, it was still a highly functional arms control agreement that imposed significant constraints on Iran's nuclear program for at least for a decade or more.

Campaigning hard against the agreement, candidate Trump vowed to renegotiate or leave what he deemed the worst agreement ever negotiated. Then as president, he pulled out of the agreement and launched his "maximum pressure" campaign. The administration reimposed sanctions on banking and petrochemicals and, in the past several months, has made a major effort to reduce Iran's lifeblood — its oil exports — to zero. As intended, all of this has wreaked havoc on the Iranian economy.

Not surprisingly, the regime, which the Iranian foreign minister quipped had a Ph.D. in sanctions busting, signaled through mine attacks on six oil tankers in the past month that it had options, too. Within hours of Thursday's attacks, oil prices spiked.

No matter how egregious the regime's behavior in other areas, pulling out of the JCPOA without a Plan B other than "maximum pressure" has more than any other factor brought us where we are today.
Well, that and the fact that Donald Trump and his advisors actively want a war with Iran.

As, it appears, does Vladimir Putin. Olga Lautman notes on Twitter: "While tensions are heating up with Iran Russian Energy Minister Alexander Novak is in Iran holding talks with Iran's oil minister."

I strongly suspect the Kremlin is trying to orchestrate a U.S.-Iran war. A war that it won't even have to fight:


* * *

[Content Note: Racism; nativism. Covers entire section.]

Oliver Laughland at the Guardian: How Trump's Census Question Could Transform America's Electoral Map. "For the first time, the census could include a question on respondents' citizenship that, according to the bureau's own research, will substantially reduce the number of people willing to participate. A study published last week estimated that the addition of the question could mean up to 4 million people — mostly people of color from immigrant minority communities — could go uncounted. If such an undercount occurs the effects will be profound. It could allow for electorate boundaries throughout America to be redrawn, almost certainly favouring the Republican party. It could result in billions of dollars in federal funds being withheld from some of the most vulnerable communities in America."

Rebekah Entralgo at ThinkProgress: Census Battle over Citizenship Question Leaves Immigration Activists with Their Hands Tied.
The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to rule on the constitutionality of the the citizenship question by the end of the month, but not before the Census Bureau launched a test last Thursday to examine how its inclusion will impact responses. Approximately 480,000 housing units around the country will receive a questionnaire with households randomly assigned to one of two versions of the questionnaire: one with the citizenship question included, the other without. These results are expected to be completed by October.

So where does that leave the groups that advocate on behalf of immigrants and want to ensure their community members are counted? For now at least, their hands are tied.

Many people are not aware of the census in the first place, and a tremendous amount of resources is spent on outreach and keeping communities informed. With the citizenship question in limbo until at least the end of June, that reduces the amount of time groups can provide outreach.

"We are waiting to see what happens and then we'll decide accordingly," Zahra Billoo, executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations' (CAIR) San Francisco Bay office told ThinkProgress. "I tell my staff we are planning to encourage participation in the census the same way we did in 2010. Because it's really important that all of these communities be counted. This matters now and well beyond this president's time in office."

But, Billoo emphasizes, that's not to say she isn't extremely hesitant.

"We recognize, of course, that we could not discourage participation in the census," she added. "The option isn't discourage versus encourage. It is neutral or silent versus encourage. Because even though I do want my community to be counted, it would also weigh heavily on me if I weren't confident in the safety, security, and secrecy of the census data."
Amelia Thomson-DeVeaux at FiveThirtyEight: The Citizenship Question Could Cost California and Texas a Seat in Congress. "The results of the count determine everything from where grocery stores are placed to how congressional representatives are distributed. There are few things we care more about around here than political apportionment (although, if we're being honest, we care an awful lot about groceries, too). So we went in search of researchers who had estimated the potential effect of the citizenship question. We found several, none of whom agreed on just how big an impact this would have. But they were all on the same page about one thing — if the Supreme Court rules that the new question can be included, it could alter our political future."

* * *

Kate Riga at TPM: On Heels of Conway Rec, Dems Call for Probe into Kushner for Hatch Violations. Just days after the Office of Special Counsel recommended that White House counselor Kellyanne Conway be fired for violating the Hatch Act, Reps. Ted Lieu (D-CA) and Don Breyer (D-VA) are calling for Jared Kushner to be investigated as well. 'As you know, under the Hatch Act, federal employees are prohibited from fundraising for political candidates,' they wrote to the Office of Special Counsel. 'Alarmingly, recent media reports indicate that Mr. Kushner is nonetheless taking a direct role in raising funds for the re-election campaign of [Donald] Trump.'"

This is the right thing to do, because ethics and rules still matter. But nothing will come of it. Kellyanne Conway and Jared Kushner will not be fired. Members of the Trump administration won't stop violating the Hatch Act. The only result will be that that the Trump administration is further empowered by having visibly broken the law and gotten away with it (again). Which underlines the urgency of impeaching him now.

Rachael Bade at the Washington Post: Push to Impeach Trump Stalls Amid Democrats' Deference to — and Fear of — Pelosi. "As pressure has mounted in recent weeks on House Democrats to move more aggressively against Trump, Pelosi has demonstrated the firm grip she wields over her caucus — quashing, at least for now, the push for impeachment. It is a command that colleagues say is drawn from a deep well of respect for the political wisdom of the most powerful woman in American politics — and fear that challenging her comes with the risk of grave cost to one's career."

Care more about the entire country than your careers, Democrats. For fuck's sake.

If we wanted opportunistic careerists who didn't give a flying fuck about the nation's future, we could just vote for Republicans. Get a goddamned grip.

* * *

[CN: Misogyny; racism] Isabella Dally-Steele at Ms.: This Week in Trump's War on Women. "On Tuesday, Politico revealed that claims of racism and sexism in the Treasury Department, which came to a head after Secretary Steve Mnuchin's decision to delay the historic rebranding of the $20 bill by changing out Andrew Jackson's image for Harriet Tubman's until at least 2026, were spot on. Nancy Cook revealed that the department's lack of diversity is much more than skin deep — with only three women and one person of color in Department's 20-person senior staff and an overwhelmingly white, male boys club culture permeating the workplace. 'For women and people of color,' said one of Cook's sources, a former Treasury official, 'there is just a general feeling when you walk in and there are all white men that it is not a comfortable environment.'"

[CN: Sexual assault; war on agency] Staff at AP: Ex-Pastor in Texas Accused of Sexually Abusing Teen Relative. "A former Southern Baptist pastor who supported legislation in Texas that would have criminalized abortions has been arrested on charges of child sex abuse, accused of repeatedly molesting a teenage relative over the course of two years." Men who object to women's right of consent over our own bodies when it comes to healthcare frequently don't care about our right of consent in any circumstance.

[CN: Misogyny] Sam Stein at the Daily Beast: Exclusive Poll Reveals Dems' Sexism Problem in 2020.
Sexism is weighing down the women running for the Democratic presidential nomination, a new public opinion survey conducted by Ipsos for The Daily Beast reveals.

A full 20 percent of Democratic and independent men who responded to the survey said they agreed with the sentiment that women are "less effective in politics than men." And while 74 percent of respondents claimed they were personally comfortable with a female president, only 33 percent believed their neighbors would be comfortable with a woman in the Oval Office.

That latter number, explained Mallory Newall, research director at Ipsos, was a strong tell about how gender dynamics were souring voters on certain candidates. Asking respondents how they believe their neighbors feel about an issue is "a classic method to get around people being reluctant to admit to less popular views."
Jesus fucking Jones, dudes. Get your shit together.

* * *

Jaclyn Jeffrey-Wilensky at NBC News: Without Swift Action on Climate Change, Heat Waves Could Kill Thousands in U.S. Cities. "If global warming sometimes seems like a distant or abstract threat, new research casts the phenomenon in stark, life-or-death terms. It predicts that in the absence of significant progress in efforts to curb emissions of temperature-raising greenhouse gases, extreme heat waves could claim thousands of lives in major U.S. cities. If the global average temperature rises 3 degrees Celsius (5.4 degrees Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial levels — which some scientists say is likely if nations honor only their current commitments for curbing emissions — a major heat wave could kill almost 6,000 people in New York City. Similar events could kill more than 2,500 in Los Angeles and more than 2,300 in Miami."

Brian Kahn at Earther: Half of Greenland's Surface Started Melting This Week, Which Is Not Normal. "Greenland has been scorching (by Greenland standards) for the past few days, with temperatures rising 10-20 degrees Celsius (18-36 degrees Fahrenheit) above normal across the island. Ruth Mottram, a climate scientist with the Danish Meteorological Institute, told Earther that the weather station at the top of the ice sheet saw temperatures reach above freezing on Wednesday and they were headed that way again on Thursday. That puts them just a degree or so away from setting the all-time heat record for June, which is currently held by June 2012."

Erin McCormick, Bennett Murray, Carmela Fonbuena, Leonie Kijewski, Gökçe Saraçoğlu, Jamie Fullerton, Alastair Gee, and Charlotte Simmonds at the Guardian: Where Does Your Plastic Go? Global Investigation Reveals America's Dirty Secret.
What happens to your plastic after you drop it in a recycling bin?

According to promotional materials from America's plastics industry, it is whisked off to a factory where it is seamlessly transformed into something new.

This is not the experience of Nguyễn Thị Hồng Thắm, a 60-year-old Vietnamese mother of seven, living amid piles of grimy American plastic on the outskirts of Hanoi. Outside her home, the sun beats down on a Cheetos bag; aisle markers from a Walmart store; and a plastic bag from ShopRite, a chain of supermarkets in New Jersey, bearing a message urging people to recycle it.

Tham is paid the equivalent of $6.50 a day to strip off the non-recyclable elements and sort what remains: translucent plastic in one pile, opaque in another.

A Guardian investigation has found that hundreds of thousands of tons of U.S. plastic are being shipped every year to poorly regulated developing countries around the globe for the dirty, labor-intensive process of recycling. The consequences for public health and the environment are grim.
This is a must-read report.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

Republicans Protect Rapists' Parental Rights in Alabama

[Content Note: Sexual violence; anti-choicery; rape apologia; hostility to consent.]

As I have regrettably had occasion to observe many, many times in this space over the last 14 years, the Republican Party does not have a solid history of taking sexual assault seriously, to put it mildly.

There was that time House Republicans tried to redefine rape so that it was only "real" rape if it involved force. Then there was the time that Senate Republicans blocked votes on military sexual assault legislation. There was that other time New York state Republicans blocked a proposal to eliminate the statute of limitations on child sexual abuse. And let's not forget that time when Georgia state Republicans didn't want to consider a proposal on rape kits and accused the Democratic sponsor of "politicizing" the issue to get votes.

There was that time former GOP Senator and two-time presidential candidate Rick Santorum said that pregnant rape victims should make the best out of a bad situation. And that time former GOP Senate candidate Todd Akin argued that pregnancy from rape is really rare, because "If it's a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down." And that time Akin also accused women of lying about rape. And that time GOP Senate candidate Richard Mourdock said that getting pregnant from rape is god's plan. And all the times Republicans have told women how to avoid getting ourselves raped, as if it's our responsibility to stop rapists rather than predators' responsibility to not rape people.

There's Joe Walsh. And John Koster. And Phil Gingrey. And Thomas Corbin. And Jonathan Stickland. And Roy Moore. And Blake Farenthold. Just the tip of the iceberg of Republican politicians who have said stupid shit about sexual assault and/or been accused of sexual assault themselves.

And then there's the current Republican president, whose opening salvo in his campaign was to call undocumented Mexican immigrants rapists; who compared trade deficits to rape — twice; who is himself a confessed serial sex abuser; and whose Secretary of Education has rewritten campus assault guidlines to favor predators; and whose Supreme Court justice was confirmed despite (or because of) credible allegations of sexual assault.

This is hardly a comprehensive list. The litany of examples of Republicans blocking legislation that would address sexual assault or support survivors, and of Republicans saying inappropriate things about rape and/or its victims, and of Republicans who have themselves engaged in sexual harassment and/or assault is interminable. And intolerable.

Which is all preface to say that it it not surprising, but it is nonetheless absolutely rage-making that the Republican Party of Alabama continues to protect rapists' parental rights while eroding pregnant people's bodily autonomy and rights to access a legal healthcare procedure to terminate their pregnancies.

Emily Wax-Thibodeaux at the Washington Post reports:

Alabama is one of two states with no statute terminating parental rights for a person found to have conceived the child by rape or incest, a fact that has gained fresh relevance since its lawmakers adopted the nation's strictest abortion ban in May. That statute even outlaws the procedure for victims of sexual assault and jails doctors who perform it, except in cases of serious risk to the woman’s health.

...Last month, Alabama lawmakers considered a bill that addressed ending parental rights in cases of rape that result in conception, but the legislature removed that language, limiting the law to cases in which people sexually assault their children. State Sen. Vivian Figures (D)...said she didn't know Alabama lacked a statute preventing rapists from gaining custody of their offspring but told The Washington Post that she now plans to introduce a bill in the next legislative session.

"It's just...unfair and even dangerous to these mothers and children," said Figures, who voted against the state's abortion ban.
There is much more at the link.

Naturally, opponents of a law limiting rapists' access to children conceived via rape are relying on ancient narratives about women being liars who constantly allege rape fraudulently in order to defend not having a law that protects victims from having to maintain contact with men who raped them. Women, they say, will lie about having been raped in order to deny fathers access to their children.

Suffice it to say, these men's rights advocates are not concerned in the slightest about the possibility that rapists will leverage impregnating their victims in order to guarantee a lifetime of access to them, despite the fact that reproductive coercion is a documented endemic phenomenon, while women accusing men of rape to deny them parental rights is not.

Republicans' hostility to consent is legendary and central to their ideology. And we must be blunt about this: They are empowering rapists as part of their war on agency. This isn't just a fortunate byproduct of their contempt for women's agency; abetting rapists' control over women's reproduction is by design.

Republican leadership at any level of government is an urgent health crisis and a pressing safety issue for women. That is not a matter of opinion. It is a fact.

[Related Reading: #StopTheBans.]

Open Wide...

Primarily Speaking

image of a cartoon version of me standing and looking confused and scratching my head, pictured in front of a patriotic stars-and-stripes graphic, to which I've added text reading: 'The Democratic Primary 2020: Let's do this thing.'

Welcome to another edition of Primarily Speaking, because presidential primaries now begin fully one million years before the election!

I really like this strong and unequivocal statement from Julián Castro about Attorney General Bill Barr:


I am also pleased with this statement about Donald Trump from Senator Elizabeth Warren on Lawrence O'Donnell's show last night:

Look, there are some issues that are bigger than politics — and one of them is whether a President of the United States is above the law.

You know, I understand that, in a dictatorship, everybody circles around the president and protects him, but that's not the way the Constitution divides power in our country. It says that no one is above the law, and that includes the President of the United States. And the tool to make sure that the president is not above the law, the tool given to Congress, is an impeachment proceeding.

This is serious. This is about a foreign — a hostile foreign government that attacked our election system and an investigation into that that was blocked by the president for his own political purposes.

This is a moment when we have to stand up in Congress. It's not a question of political party or the next election. It's about what we think is right.

And I didn't go into this thinking, "Oh great. Let's see if we can stir up a big impeachment fight." It's the conclusion I've reached by reading the whole report.

And I urge everybody to read that report. [chuckles mirthlessly] I urge all of my colleagues to read that report — and tell me how they can stand by and say, "You know, that kind of behavior may be just fine in a President of the United States."

It's not fine. No one's above the law. Not even the president.
THANK YOU, SENATOR.

In other news...

Senator Kamala Harris will be the keynote speaker for a meeting of the black caucus of the Alabama Democratic Party in June. Quite a get! For both parties.

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand has an interesting proposal to get money out of politics: "Under Gillibrand's Clean Elections Plan, every eligible voter could register for vouchers to donate up to $100 in a primary election and $100 in a general election each cycle, either all at once or in $10 increments to one or more candidates over time. Each participant would get a separate $200 pool for House, Senate, and presidential contests for a total maximum donation of $600 for those federal offices. ...Politicians would face much tighter limits on donations."

Remember the days when money in politics was the biggest threat to free and fair elections outside of voter suppression and gerrymandering? How quaint! Even if Gillibrand's proposal has merit, I'm afraid it won't matter unless we do what is necessary to safeguard our elections against interference, both foreign and domestic, and that simply isn't going to happen as long as Republicans remain in charge and committed to subverting our democracy instead of protecting it.

Speaking of people who aren't fans of democracy... Senator Bernie Sanders, writes Ronald Brownstein at CNN, will be tested during this primary in ways he hasn't been previously. That is to say, he will actually be scrutinized and vetted. "Deeply ideological, and often prickly when challenged in media interviews, Sanders has often brushed away criticism of his agenda by dismissing any skeptics as servants of 'the billionaire class.' In the coming months, he'll likely need more supple responses to fellow Democrats questioning ideas such as single-payer health care or tuition-free public college from a center-left perspective." Indeed.

In comparing his record to Joe Biden's during a CNN interview, Sanders said: "I have to tell you, I like Joe Biden. Joe is a friend of mine. But I think what we need to do with all of the candidates, have an issue-oriented campaign, not personal attacks, but talk about what we have done in our political lives, what we want to do as president, and how we're going to transform our economy so that it works for all of us and not just the 1 percent." First of all, the hell they're friends, lol. Secondly, Sanders committed to "no personal attacks" the last time around and then spent fully the entire campaign levying personal attacks on Hillary Clinton, including incredibly calling her "unqualified," so my only response to this is: You first, Senator.

Speaking of Biden, he's running on a platform of nostalgia, writes the Atlantic's David A. Graham: "Biden is running a campaign of restoration — returning the United States to its rightful place before (as he sees it) the current president came onto the scene and trashed the joint. ...He wants to take the country back, all the way to the dim and distant days of 2015 or so, when the Obama administration he served in ran the country and Trump was merely a punch line." LOL pretty much.

Which, y'know, isn't good enough. Especially because it fails to acknowledge that we can't just restore everything we've already lost in the last two years just by magically electing a Democrat. The entire landscape has changed, and we need to look forward for real solutions — not only to Trump, but to other global forces that are changing our world, including the rise of fascism elsewhere and democracy-threatening technological advances.

* * *

Over at BuzzFeed, Claudia Koerner asked the candidates their thoughts on vaccines, and nine Democrats provided answers. Sanders, Harris, Senator Cory Booker, Andrew Yang, Gillibrand, John Delaney, Rep. Seth Moulton, and Rep. Tim Ryan all had good to very good answers. Mayor Pete Buttigieg did not have a good answer:


The article was later updated: "After this article was published, the campaign added in a 'clarifying statement' early Wednesday that Buttigieg only supported medical exemptions to vaccinations. 'Pete believes vaccines are safe and effective and are necessary to maintaining public health,' the spokesperson said. 'There is no evidence that vaccines are unsafe, and he believes children should be immunized to protect their health. He is aware that in most states the law provides for some kinds of exemptions. He believes only medical exemptions should be allowed.'"

Still not ready for primetime.

In other Buttigieg news, he has released 10 years of tax returns.

Beto O'Rourke's campaign "is still a campaign in transition." That doesn't sound good.

At the Washington Post, Suzanna Danuta Walters writes that if male candidates really GAF about gender equality, then they should get out of the race — or at least campaign far differently.
A real reckoning with privilege goes beyond acknowledgment and into action. Given the unbroken record of male presidents and what we know about the double standards under which female candidates run — including obsessive attention to their voices, their bodies, their clothes — it is worth asking what steps male candidates of good faith can take to even the playing field.

First, they could do more than give the notion of privilege a cursory nod.

They could refuse to give interviews to news organizations that have practiced gender discrimination in their coverage of the campaigns and say "no thanks" to the magazine covers that curiously feature only them. They could call out the disproportionate attention they receive, as well as the presumption that they are more electable by virtue of their gender, and instead point out the fact that the women running have already won multiple races, written many books, and have deep executive and policy experience — claims that could not be universally made of their male counterparts.

...The really radical thing for a male candidate to do in 2020 would be to step down and step away, realizing that real gender equity is achieved only when men actively refuse the benefits they receive simply for being born male.

Gender and racial equity are not zero-sum games: Everyone is a winner when we have a more diverse and representative government. But we can't achieve that vision without men taking responsibility for the inordinate space they take up in the media and the candidate field.
Yup.

John Hickenlooper is still definitely running for president.

Talk about these things! Or don't. Whatever makes you happy. Life is short.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 824

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Late yesterday and earlier today by me: An Observation and No No No No No No No and Primarily Speaking.

Here are some more things in the news today...

As I've said before, I tend to avoid sharing Donald Trump's prolific tweetshitz here, but, occasionally, there is something worthy of comment. He really went off on a tear this morning, and this entry was particularly notable:


Trump is braying that the New York Times should "get down on their knees and beg for forgiveness" on the same day they published an execrable mess in which a Democratic former White House Press Secretary argues that Democrats should let Trump be continue to be president unimpeded.

I really hope the rest of the political press is paying attention. There is no sycophancy adequate enough to satiate Donald Trump. He is an abuser to his core, and he will continue to abuse the press, no matter how much they pander to him. If they write that he is the best president the U.S. has ever had, he will rage that they did not say he is the best president the world has ever had.

Abuse is the point. Discrediting them among his supporters will never cease. And indulging him is precisely the wrong response to that.

He's an unpopular aspiring authoritarian. Treat him accordingly.


Tom Hamburger at the Washington Post: White House Instructs Official to Ignore Democratic Subpoena over Security Clearances.
A former White House personnel security director has been instructed by the White House not to show up Tuesday for questioning by the House Oversight Committee.

The move appears to be the latest effort by the Trump administration to push back against congressional inquiries targeting the White House, which have proliferated since Democrats took control of the House in January.

White House deputy counsel Michael M. Purpura wrote a letter Monday asking the former security director, Carl Kline, not to show up as the committee had requested. Kline is now working at the Defense Department.

In a letter to Kline's lawyer obtained by The Washington Post, Purpura wrote that a committee subpoena asking Kline to appear "unconstitutionally encroaches on fundamental executive branch interests."

In a separate letter Monday, Kline's attorney, Robert Driscoll, told the panel that his client would adhere to the White House recommendation.
"Fuck your checks. Fuck your balances. Fuck you." — Donald J. Trump, probably.

Aaron David Miller and Richard Sokolsky at Politico: Trump Isn't Just Reversing Obama's Foreign Policies; He's Making It Impossible for His Successor to Go Back to Them. "The administration is focused like a laser beam on irreversibly burning U.S. bridges to Iran and administering last rites to a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. And if you look at the administration's actual policies, it's clear they aren't just meant to overturn President Barack Obama's actions, but also to create points of no return — so that successor administrations cannot revert to past approaches even if they want to. If the administration succeeds — and it's well on its way to doing so — it will have fundamentally damaged U.S. national interests for years to come."

That is what I mean when I say that Trump "leverages the power of the presidency to destroy our democracy as swiftly and irreparably as he can."

[Content Note: Sexual violence]


That, of course, is a direct rebuke of Hillary Clinton's foreign policy agenda. Sob.

Speaking of Hillary Clinton... [CN: Misogyny] Alex Roarty and Katie Glueck at McClatchy: 'There's Still a Lot of Sexism': Dem Leaders Frustrated by Double Standards Facing Female Candidates.
Stephanie Schriock shudders when she remembers how critics reacted to Elizabeth Warren's 2020 campaign announcement, sharply questioning whether she was likable enough to become president.

It's not a question Schriock thinks even the most cantankerous male candidates face.

"Elizabeth Warren spent the first week of her presidential campaign battling back whether she was likable enough," said Schriock, president of EMILY's List, a group that supports Democratic women in favor of abortion rights. "Now, I worked in the Senate, and I have seen Senator [Bernie] Sanders. And I'm just going to tell you, he's not that likable."

Schriock's frustration with perceived double standards for women candidates is shared by many influential Democrats, who argue that their party's half-dozen female presidential candidates have been repeatedly hindered by unfair treatment in the early stages of the campaign. In interviews, a group of leading Democrats sought to sound the alarm about what they regard as embedded sexism in the 2020 primary — both from their own voters and in some media coverage — that has resulted in a tilted playing field.

"I feel frustrated because I don't feel that the women candidates are getting the same kind of coverage," said Rep. Pramila Jayapal, co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus.

Some female candidates receive short-lived attention when they roll out a sweeping set of policy proposals, the Washington Democrat added, "Whereas candidates do something like get on a countertop and that gets covered for days."

She was referring to Beto O'Rourke, whose penchant for standing on tabletops while campaigning has made headlines. Jayapal, Schriock, and other Democrats interviewed emphasized that they didn't mean to direct their criticism at male candidates, most of whom they described as talented and qualified.

But they did want to take aim at the broader cultural dynamics that they think have tipped the scales in favor of these men — even as a record-number of serious female candidates compete for the nomination.
Gee, it's almost like it really wasn't just that Hillary Clinton was uniquely unlikeable after all. Huh! Who could have predicted.

[CN: Islamophobia] Erin Banco at the Daily Beast: Sen. Lindsey Graham Bewilders Ivanka Trump's Women's Conference with Terrorism Rant. "While on a trip to Côte d'Ivoire last week to help Ivanka Trump promote women's access to capital in Africa, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) warned of religious wars with 'radical ideology' that would be 'hell on earth for women' if they are not 'destroyed.' 'It's the enemy of mankind, not just the United States,' Graham said, of the theoretical invaders, according to a recording provided to The Daily Beast. 'Some of our soldiers will be needed, but not a lot. Most of the fighting will be done by people in the region. I promise you the enemy will lose because very few mothers or fathers want to turn their daughters over to ISIS, al Qaeda, or any other group.' As the senator spoke, confused attendees could be heard on the recording asking each other in hushed tones what he was talking about."


[CN: Rightwing violence; video may autoplay at link] Staff at CBS News: Militia Leader Allegedly Told FBI They Were Training to Assassinate Obama, Hillary Clinton. "The leader of a militia group who's been detaining migrants near the U.S.-Mexico border allegedly told the FBI his militia was training to assassinate former President Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Democratic donor George Soros. Larry Hopkins, head of the United Constitutional Patriots, is charged with possession a firearm as a felon and could face up to 10 years in prison if convicted." JFC.

[CN: Sexual abuse] Staff at NBC New York: Thousands of Boy Scout Leaders Face New Child Sex Allegations; Names Expected to Be Released Today. "Thousands of Boy Scouts of America leaders face new charges of sexual abuse, claims that are expected to be revealed in detail Tuesday in New York and New Jersey. Names of nearly 200 of the accused are also expected to be released. The allegations came to light Monday night and a group of alleged victims was expected to testify about the widespread pattern abuse within the scouting organization later Tuesday. The victims' attorney, Jeff Anderson, called it a system of denial and cover-ups. He claims the Boy Scouts have files on child abusers within their ranks dating back to the 1940s." Unfathomable. I take up space in solidarity with the victims of this vile systemic abuse.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 810

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Late yesterday and earlier today by me: I (Still) Expect More and Trump Purges DHS to Pursue Radical Nativist Agenda and Primarily Speaking and If I'd Ever Thought the Mueller Investigation Was Serious, I'd Be Very Disappointed Right Now.

Here are some more things in the news today...

Let's start with some good news! Amanda Michelle Gomez at ThinkProgress: House Forms First Black Maternal Health Caucus.
Reps. Alma Adams (D-NC) and Lauren Underwood (D-IL) officially launched the first-ever Black Maternal Health Caucus on Tuesday, in hopes of tackling one of the widest racial disparities in health care today. Back women are 243 percent more likely to die from pregnancy or childbirth-related causes than their white counterparts.

The public health crisis has been getting more national attention recently, thanks in part to an award-winning ProPublica/NPR series on the soaring maternal mortality rate and celebrity testimonies from Serena Williams and Beyoncé on their own harrowing experiences.

The Black Maternal Health Caucus, which already has more than 30 members, was created to research and push for policies that are culturally competent.

"This year, we decided enough is enough," said Adams at a press conference.
Right on.

* * *

[Content Note: Nativism] Nancy LeTourneau at Washington Monthly: No, Mr. President, the Country Is Not Full. "Donald Trump has come up with a new line that he is using both on Twitter and in his public appearances. He keeps repeating that our country is full. [Example tweet: "Mexico must apprehend all illegals and not let them make the long march up to the United States, or we will have no other choice than to Close the Border and/or institute Tariffs. Our Country is FULL!"] Of course that's a lie... Areas of the country that are thriving because they are exempt from the downward spiral of population loss tend to be those that support Democrats. That is why Daniel Block recently wrote about how the monopolization of our economy drives population growth to large coastal metropolitan areas, leaving the heartland behind. ...[C]ontrary to Trump's lies, the county isn't full, and immigration could be the answer to combat one of the biggest economic challenges we face."

Peter Stone at the Guardian: Trump Hotels Exempted from Ban on Foreign Payments Under New Stance. "The Department of Justice has adopted a narrow interpretation of a law meant to bar foreign interests from corrupting federal officials, giving Saudi Arabia, China, and other countries leeway to curry favor with Donald Trump via deals with his hotels, condos, trademarks, and golf courses, legal and national security experts say." So much for the foreign emoluments clause! And let's be clear: This is essentially the normalization of Trump's collusion with foreign governments.

Allan Smith at NBC News: Trump's Attorney Promises Fight over Trump's Taxes. "On Sunday, Trump's attorney Jay Sekulow accused Democrats of using the IRS as a 'political weapon' to obtain the president's tax returns and promised to fight the move if necessary. ...'[I]f necessary — we're not at that point yet — if it has to be litigated, it will be litigated.' ...Last month, Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin said at a Ways and Means hearing that he would protect Trump's privacy if a request [from Congress] were made."

The President of the United States is a lawless criminal whose entire administration operates with the explicit goal of shielding him from consequences for his traitorous lawbreaking.


Paul McLeod at BuzzFeed: Republicans Are Warning Drug Companies Not to Cooperate with a Congressional Investigation. "In an unusual move, House Republicans are warning drug companies against complying with a House investigation into drug prices. Republicans on the House Oversight Committee sent letters to a dozen CEOs of major drug companies warning that information they provide to the committee could be leaked to the public by Democratic chair Elijah Cummings in an effort to tank their stock prices. ...In their letters, Reps. Jim Jordan and Mark Meadows — leaders of the hardline conservative House Freedom Caucus — imply that Cummings may be attempting to collect the information in order to bring down the industry's stock prices." Ridiculous! And aggressively unethical!

Janna Herron at USA Today: Another Tax Headache Ahead: IRS Is Changing Paycheck Withholdings and It'll Be a Doozy. "The Internal Revenue Service is changing how you adjust your paycheck withholdings, and early indicators show it won't be easy. The agency plans to release a new W-4 form [later this year] that better incorporates the changes ushered in by the new tax law so that the amount held back for taxes in each of your paychecks is more accurate. The agency's goal: A taxpayer shouldn't owe or be owed come tax time. But the changes won't be simple, says Pete Isberg, head of government affairs at ADP, the payroll and human resources company. Filling out the new form will be a lot like doing your taxes again. 'It'll be a much bigger pain,' he says. 'The accuracy will be 100 percent, but the ease-of-use will be zero.'"

Justin Elliott at ProPublica: Congress Is About to Ban the Government from Offering Free Online Tax Filing; Thank TurboTax. "Last week, the House Ways and Means Committee, led by Rep. Richard Neal, D-Mass., passed the Taxpayer First Act, a wide-ranging bill making several administrative changes to the IRS that is sponsored by Reps. John Lewis, D-Ga., and Mike Kelly, R-Pa. In one of its provisions, the bill makes it illegal for the IRS to create its own online system of tax filing. Companies like Intuit, the maker of TurboTax, and H&R Block have lobbied for years to block the IRS from creating such a system. If the tax agency created its own program, which would be similar to programs other developed countries have, it would threaten the industry's profits."

Margaret Sullivan at the Washington Post: A Board to Oversee Georgia Journalists Sounds Like Orwellian Fiction; the Proposal Is All Too Real.
When Richard Griffiths, president of the Georgia First Amendment Foundation, heard about the bill filed last week in his state's House of Representatives, he thought for a moment that it was an April Fools joke.

If only.

The bill — a proposal to oversee journalists sponsored by six Republican lawmakers — is no wacky prank.

...Echoing the government's Ministry of Truth in George Orwell's dystopian novel, 1984, the proposal would establish a "Journalism Ethics Board" to create professional standards for news people.

And, among other provisions, it would require reporters to surrender their recordings, photographs, and notes to an interviewee upon request. If a news outlet refuses, it would be subject to legal action and fines.

...There may be no direct tie between the voting-suppression concerns [rampant in Georgia, care of Republican Governor Brian Kemp] and the proposed journalism bill.

But controlling the pesky press corps would mean one less annoyance on the road to political malfeasance.
The entire Republican Party is just enacting authoritarianism (or trying to) as quickly as possible, in order to shield themselves from accountability, just like their deplorable president.

* * *

AP Staff at the LA Times: Global Warming Is Shrinking Glaciers Faster Than Thought. "Earth's glaciers are melting much faster than scientists thought. A new study shows they are losing 369 billion tons of snow and ice each year, more than half of that in North America. The most comprehensive measurement of glaciers worldwide found that thousands of inland masses of snow compressed into ice are shrinking 18% faster than an international panel of scientists calculated in 2013. The world's glaciers are shrinking five times faster now than they were in the 1960s." JFC.

[CN: White supremacy] Tom Boggioni at Raw Story: White Nationalists and Neo-Nazis Are Increasingly Recruiting Gamers to Fill Their Ranks. "According to an expert on gaming and gaming culture, white nationalists are finding gaming chatrooms and forums to be fertile ground for recruiting disaffected young white men into their movement — which also includes supporting [Donald] Trump. In an interview with Zack Beauchamp at Vox, Megan Condis, a professor of communication at Texas Tech, explained that often gamers are young white men who feel they don't fit in anywhere else making them easy to influence when offered the opportunity to be invited to join a group. ...With Beauchamp pointing out, 'You've noted that far-right political factions and white nationalists are actively taking advantage of these dynamics to actively radicalize young men and recruit them to their cause,' Condis mentioned the fact that former Donald Trump White House adviser Steve Bannon recognized the dynamic during what was known as 'Gamergate.'"

[CN: LGBTQ hatred; misogyny] Andy Towle at Towleroad: Mike Huckabee: LGBTQ People Are 'Greatest Threat' to America. "Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee is attacking LGBTQ people once again in a new interview with the Christian Post, telling the publication that redefinitions of gender and sexual identity are the 'greatest threat' to America. Said Huckabee: 'The biggest threat to biblical principles today is the failure to apply a biblical standard of maleness and femaleness. We are creating this illusion that there is no gender, there is no identity, and I'm blaming the Christian Church.' Huckabee blamed the rise of same-sex marriage on California's introduction of 'no-fault divorce' in 1970. Said Huckabee: 'That's when we first started losing that sense of sacredness of what marriage meant. So I'm not really that surprised that same sex-marriage has become in vogue because the Christian Church were the ones who essentially abdicated a strict responsibility about what biblical marriage should look like.'"

He is absolutely saying that queer people are a threat to America. He is also saying that feminist women are a threat to America. That "no-fault divorce" talking point is an ancient anti-feminist dogwhistle, used for decades by men who see autonomous women who have agency over their own reproduction and are empowered with the right of consent as a serious threat to their patriarchal rule. And they're right. We are. Just like queer people who provide visible alternate models to toxic masculinity, the gender binary, rigid gender roles, and "traditional" marriage.

Think about that the next time you hear some doe-eyed dipshit going on about how we need to extend empathy to Trump supporters.

Which is right now! Justin Kirkland at Esquire: Chris Evans Is Launching a Political Website Because Saving the Universe Isn't Enough. "With his time as Captain America likely coming to an end with Avengers: Endgame, Chris Evans is going to use his superhero skills to protect the country from something more evil — the political divide. The actor is launching a website called A Starting Point, which focuses on featuring political discourse from both sides of the aisle with the ultimate goal of helping create 'informed, responsible and empathetic citizens,' The Hill reports."

BOTH SIDES HAVE A POINT! LET'S JUST COME TOGETHER AND TRY TO UNDERSTAND ONE ANOTHER, OKAY? UNITY AND SHIT!

*jumps into Christmas tree*

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...