Maybe the reason "Ann Coulter hasn't lost any of her 100-plus newspaper clients, or the support of her syndicate, Universal Press Syndicate, despite her nasty remarks in her new book about 9/11 widows" is that they have read her book. According to the rebuttal I saw, the remark was aimed specifically at the four "Jersey Girls" and not all widows of 9/11.Thank you, Parsey McParsington, for clearing up the precise bristle count of the paintbrush used to make the smear.
Brian Alpert
Knowing that Coulter was only referring to some 9/11 widows, rather than all of them, when she said she’d “never seen people enjoying their husband’s death so much” makes the comment much more acceptable.
At least to total douchebags.
Shakesville is run as a safe space. First-time commenters: Please read Shakesville's Commenting Policy and Feminism 101 Section before commenting. We also do lots of in-thread moderation, so we ask that everyone read the entirety of any thread before commenting, to ensure compliance with any in-thread moderation. Thank you.
blog comments powered by Disqus