In what's actually quite a good editorial, the NYT makes the obvious point about Bush refusing to send Rove and Miers (et. al.) to testify before Congress under oath: "Why would anyone refuse to take an oath on a matter like this, unless he were not fully committed to telling the truth?"
Why indeed.
Shakesville is run as a safe space. First-time commenters: Please read Shakesville's Commenting Policy and Feminism 101 Section before commenting. We also do lots of in-thread moderation, so we ask that everyone read the entirety of any thread before commenting, to ensure compliance with any in-thread moderation. Thank you.
blog comments powered by Disqus