Democrats Are on It

Mike DeBonis at the Washington Post reports that House Democrats are planning to hit the new legislative session running:

House Democratic leaders are set to publicly unveil on Friday the outline of a broad political overhaul bill that will include provisions for public financing of elections, voting rights reforms, and new ethics strictures for federal officials.

The bill has been in the works for months as part of Democrats' "For the People" campaign platform, a framework that helped them win the House majority in this month's midterm elections.

Numerous outside groups aligned with Democrats have pushed the party's House leaders to schedule a reform bill as their first order of business, and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) announced before the election that the bill would be designated "H.R. 1" — a symbolic title meant to emphasize its importance, even if it is unlikely to be the first piece of legislation to get a House vote in the new Congress.

On Friday, Pelosi, whom Democrats nominated this week as their next speaker, will unveil elements of the bill Friday alongside principal author Rep. John Sarbanes (D-Md.) and several members of the freshman class.

Elements of the legislation, according to a draft outline reviewed by The Washington Post, include new donor disclosure requirements for political organizations, a system to multiply small donations to political campaigns, mandating a new ethical code for the Supreme Court, ending most first-class travel for federal officeholders, and a broad effort to expand voting access and reduce partisan gerrymandering.
Everyone has an opinion about where House Democrats should start with their newly reclaimed majority, and thus they're not going to make everyone happy, but, in my estimation, voting rights, ethics, and campaign financing are a pretty damn good place to start.

And House Democrats under Nancy Pelosi's leadership have historically been good multitaskers. I've no doubt they can start pushing for reforms to shore up our democracy and work on investigations that target the people who want to tear it to pieces.

Go get 'em, Dems.

Open Wide...

Trump Wanted to Give Putin $50M Trump Tower Penthouse During the 2016 Campaign

As I have said many, many times: The collusion between Donald Trump and the Russians has always been right out in the open.

That doesn't mean, of course, that there wasn't also collusion going on that none of us could see.

Like, for example, as we've now learned in the wake of Michael Cohen's guilty plea, that Trump intended to give Vladimir Putin the $50 million penthouse in Trump Tower, for reasons that included trying to entice other Russian oligarchs to spend their money with Trump — because, according to Felix Sater, "In Russia, the oligarchs would bend over backwards to live in the same building as Vladimir Putin. My idea was to give a $50 million penthouse to Putin and charge $250 million more for the rest of the units. All the oligarchs would line up to live in the same building as Putin."

Anthony Cormier and Jason Leopold at BuzzFeed report:

Donald Trump's company planned to give a $50 million penthouse at Trump Tower Moscow to Russian President Vladimir Putin as the company negotiated the luxury real estate development during the 2016 campaign, according to four people, one of them the originator of the plan.

Two U.S. law enforcement officials told BuzzFeed News that Michael Cohen, Trump's personal lawyer at the time, discussed the idea with a representative of Dmitry Peskov, Putin's press secretary.

The Trump Tower Moscow plan is at the heart of a new plea agreement by Cohen, who led the negotiations to bring a gleaming, 100-story building to the Russian capital. Cohen acknowledged in court that he had lied to Congress about the plan in order to protect Trump and his presidential campaign.

The revelation that representatives of the Trump Organization planned to forge direct financial links with the leader of a hostile nation at the height of the campaign raises fresh questions about [Donald] Trump's relationship with the Kremlin. The plan never went anywhere because the tower deal ultimately fizzled, and it is not clear whether Trump knew of the intention to give away the penthouse. But Cohen said in court documents that he regularly briefed Trump and his family on the Moscow negotiations.
To that end, Hunter Walker reports at Yahoo News that Mueller is also investigating reports "that the president's elder daughter, Ivanka, who is now a top White House adviser, and his eldest son, Don Jr., were also working to make Trump Tower Moscow a reality. The sources said those efforts were independent of Cohen's work on the project. One of the sources said Ivanka was also involved in Cohen's efforts."

Donald Trump may try to argue, incredibly, that Cohen and Sater were trying to give away the penthouse in Trump Tower without his knowledge, but he's going to have a hard time convincing anyone with a shred of sense and decency that he was clueless about his personal lawyer, his longtime real estate business associate, his daughter, and his son trying to make a deal to get a Trump property into the hands of Vladimir Putin.

That argument becomes an even harder sell given, as Greg Sargent at the Washington Post notes, that Trump was a presidential candidate at the time who "repeatedly talked up Putin and stated in many different ways that as president, he'd pursue good relations with him and Russia."

Trump's collusion with Russia has been evident for years. In July of 2016, months before the presidential election, I wrote "The Real Story of the DNC Email Leak is Trump's Terrifying Ties to Russia," in which I detailed the possibility that Trump was compromised by Russia, Paul Manafort's sinister history, and the Trump campaign having changed the Republican platform's Ukraine plank to be more favorable to Russia. The dots were there to be connected, long before Election Day. But far too many people were spending their time instead scolding the people connecting them for being conspiracy theorists, hysterics, and alarmists.

And now here we are.

Fortunately, Congressional Cassandra Rep. Adam Schiff has been on this from go, and the Democrats' new majority has positioned him to finally make some shit happen — which the Republicans can no longer stymie. Emma Loop at BuzzFeed reports:
A plan by Donald Trump's company to give Russian President Vladimir Putin a $50 million penthouse will be in the crosshairs of the House Intelligence Committee when Democrats take control of it in the new year, several members said. The plan, hatched during the 2016 election and involving the proposed but never realized Trump Tower Moscow, was reported Thursday by BuzzFeed News.

"If true, this story further underscores the need to finish the Committee's counterintelligence investigation to determine what, if any, financial leverage the Russians may hold over [Donald] Trump and the Trump Organization, and what Trump may have hoped to gain by any financial offer to Putin," Rep. Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the committee, said in a statement to BuzzFeed News Thursday evening.

The committee, which spent more than a year on an investigation into Russian election interference, already questioned Michael Cohen, Trump's former personal attorney, about the real estate development project. On Thursday Cohen pleaded guilty to lying to Congress about the project in order to protect Trump and his campaign.

"The Committee looks forward to inviting Mr. Cohen back to help answer these and many other outstanding questions," Schiff said.
I'll bet.

I'm looking forward to it, too.

I am not, however, giddy with anticipation about what will come next. Partly, that's because it's still a long shot that Donald Trump will face consequences and be neutered of the power he routinely abuses — and I remain well aware that Trump pushed into a corner while he retains the colossal power the office of the presidency confers is a perilous thing for the rest of us. I'm too busy fervently hoping we get through this safely to be giddy about any of it.

And partly it's because I will never stop grieving all the damage that Trump has done in the time he was allowed to be the Republican nominee and then the president, despite the fact that his collusion with Russia was apparent given some basic scrutiny. I desperately hope that we get rid of Trump and get rid of Mike Pence and get rid of all their dirtbag lackeys and find some way to rid ourselves of the stain of their leadership and restore some of what we've lost. If that can even happen, it's going to take so much work. Just contemplating it leaves me bereft of the energy required for giddiness.

I want him gone with every cell of my being, though. And I'm going to keep doing my tiny piece to make that happen every goddamn day until he's nothing but a red-behatted smear in a history book.

Open Wide...

"Guidance Regarding Political Activity" Forbids Resistance; Will Constrain Whistleblowers

That Donald Trump is an authoritarian nightmare is hardly news, but it's continually stunning to me how his every authoritarian move is not itself more major news than it ever seems to be.

This should be headlining news everywhere all day today, for example.

Eli Rosenberg at the Washington Post: No Talk of 'the Resistance' or Opinions About Impeachment at Work, Federal Employees Are Warned.

In a move that some ethics advocates say could be an opening to limit dissent, the federal government has issued new guidance for the political activity of federal government workers, warning that weighing in on impeachment or talking about "the Resistance" may constitute prohibited activity.

The Office of Special Counsel is charged with enforcing the Hatch Act, which prohibits federal employees from engaging in political activity in the course of their work. The office, not to be confused with special counsel Robert S. Mueller III's investigation, is run by Henry Kerner, whom [Donald] Trump nominated to the post.

The unsigned "Guidance Regarding Political Activity," which was issued Tuesday, uses a question-and-answer format as it seeks to clarify the types of actions and rhetoric considered political activity, and therefore prohibited at work.

In a nod to the current climate, it stipulated that advocating for or against impeachment of a candidate for federal office would be considered political because of its implications for future elections, and that any use of terms like "resistance" and "#resist" would be construed as political activity.

But some government watchdogs said they feared the guidelines could have wide-ranging effects on the nearly 3 million federal employees in the United States, as well as state and local government employees who work with federally funded programs. The ethics nonprofit American Oversight said the guidance raised "significant concerns" in a letter it sent to the office on Thursday, urging it to withdraw the memo.

...In particular, [the group's executive director, Austin Evers] expressed concern that the guidelines could constrain whistle-blowers.

"As OSC knows well, it is critically important to ensure public employees are comfortable raising concerns about waste, fraud, or abuse in the government," he wrote. "Impeachment is primarily a remedy for severe misconduct. If public employees are aware of conduct that could be impeachable but fear civil or criminal liability under the Hatch Act for saying so, they may be reluctant to approach OSA, inspectors general, or Congress."

Nick Schwellenbach, the director of investigations at the Project on Government Oversight and an employee of the OSC from 2014 to 2017, said he felt the guidance likely crossed a legal line, saying the Hatch Act was meant to be narrowly focused on political activities around parties and candidates.

"The way OSC has traditionally balanced its enforcement of that statute with the First Amendment is [focused on] supporting a candidate or political party for election. I think once you start talking about more general political views, you're starting to infringe upon people's rights," he said. "This one, I think, goes too far for them. It runs the risk of turning the OSC into an Orwellian enforcer inside the federal workforce."
That's absolutely correct. The intent of the Hatch Act is to prevent people in government from leveraging the power their positions confer to put a thumb on the scale in what should be free and fair elections. Thus it cannot be willfully misconstrued so its impact is to stifle people's First Amendment rights in order to protect a corrupt administration who exploits enforced silence of critics to expand their authoritarian reach.

This is a profound betrayal of federal employees. And let us be clear: If the Trump Regime is allowed to get away with criminalizing dissent among government employees, an attempt to criminalize dissent among the general population will surely be next.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of a pink couch

Hosted by a pink sofa. Have a seat and chat.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Suggested by Shaker DesertRose: "If you could have coffee (tea, brunch, lunch, cocktails, whatever) with any of your ancestors, whom would you choose? Why?"

My grandfather. Because I miss him.

Open Wide...

World of Shakescraft

image of colorful yarn
[Via Shirsty Cat Designs. You can buy their beautiful yarn here.]

As you know, I am not a crafty person. I am terrible at crafts! And I'm only slightly better with DIY home projects, with the occasional modest success.

But lots of Shakers are very talented crafters and DIY-ers, and I am happy to read about all of your terrific projects! So here is a thread to talk about your current crafting and/or DIY project(s), completed projects, or future projects; to share ideas; to brag about your successes or lament your setbacks; and to solicit advice from fellow creators!

(As always, make sure you don't offer advice unless it's solicited.)

Have at it in comments!

Open Wide...

#365feministselfie: Week 48

I am again participating in the #365feministselfie project, now in its fifth year, and promised a thread for others to share selfies and/or talk about the project, visibility generally, self-apprecation, and related topics. So here is a thread for Week 48!

A few of my selfies over the last two weeks:

image of me from mid-torso up, standing in a mirror wearing a grey top and a grey jacket, with my contacts in and hair down; in the reflection over my shoulder, Zelly can be seen at the top of the stairs, walking away
Zelly butthole-bombed my selfie! Ahhhhhhhhahahahahaha!

image of me from the shoulders up in the morning sunlight in my dining room; I'm wearing a pink henley top and grey-framed glasses, with my hair up in a messy bun
I woke up like this. (Not bragging, lol!)

image of me from mid-torso up, wearing a purple t-shirt with the definition of FEMINISM on it, pointing at the shirt and winking at the camera; I've got contacts in and my hair up in a messy bun
Fuck yeah.

image of my face in closeup; I'm wearing grey-framed glasses and my hair is down; my eyes are cast downward and I look very sad
Rough day.

image of me wearing grey-framed glasses and a white and navy striped top, sitting on the sofa with Olivia the White Farm Cat on my lap
A lady and her pussy.

image of me from the shoulders up, standing at my front door, with my hair down, wearing grey-framed glasses, a burgundy cardigan, a sage green top, and a beetle necklace
Off to therapy.

image of me standing in a mirror from mid-torso up, with my hair in a bun, wearing grey-framed glasses, a beige cardigan, and a black t-shirt that says ROCK AND ROLL
Mood: Rock and Roll t-shirt paired with cozy cardigan. You get it.

Please feel welcome and encouraged to share your own selfies in comments, or share your thoughts on the project, or solicit encouragement or advice, or do whatever else feels best for you to participate, if you are inclined to do so!

Open Wide...

The Democrats Take Note (Cough) of Cohen's Plea

In case you're wondering if House and Senate Democrats have taken notice of Michael Cohen's guilty plea and its details and what those details actually reveal about Donald Trump, the answer is FUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSS.

Garrett Haake, Frank Thorp V, Alex Moe, and Dartunorro Clark at NBC News: Democrats Pounce After Cohen Admits He Lied to Congress About Trump Tower Project in Russia. (Emphases mine.)

Top Democrats on Thursday excoriated [Donald] Trump after his former longtime personal attorney and fixer Michael Cohen pleaded guilty to lying to Congress about a project to build a Trump Tower in Moscow.

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., said there is a "culture of corruption" surrounding Trump and renewed calls to protect special counsel Robert Mueller, who brought the bombshell charges against Cohen on Thursday morning in Manhattan federal court as part of his investigation into Russian election meddling.

...Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., the vice chairman of [the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence], said Cohen's admission is just another example of one of Trump's "closest allies lying about their ties to Russia and Russians."

"You've got all these close associates of the president, one after another, pleading guilty, often pleading guilty about their ties to Russia and Russians, and what are they covering up for?" Warner added.

He said Cohen was "obviously" one of the witnesses "we've always wanted to have come back" before the committee.

Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., the incoming chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, called Cohen's deal a "very significant plea and statement" and suggested that there were others who possibly lied to congressional investigators.

"It means that when the president was representing on the campaign that he has no business interests in Russia, that that wasn't true," Schiff said. "This, I think, only underscores I think the importance of not only bringing Mr. Cohen back before our committee but also looking into this issue of whether the Russians possess financial leverage over the president of the United States."

...Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., the ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee and a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said in a statement on Thursday that Cohen's admission "raises serious questions about the president’s relationship with Russia and whether he and his family have been honest with the American people."

"Today's guilty plea clearly shows that we still don't know the full story and that Special Counsel Mueller must be allowed to complete his investigation without interference or delay," Feinstein said.

Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., the ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, said that Cohen's guilty plea is a serious offense and that he wants to know why he lied to Congress originally.

"He lied to Congress apparently about dealings between Trump and Russia. And that leads me to suspect that there are more dealings that the president wanted hidden," Nadler said. "And this raises all kinds of questions with respect to the question of how much — whether the Russian government has any kind of hold on the president because of his financial dealings and whether the president knew about the obvious collusion between his campaign and the Russians."

He said that he thinks it is a sign that Congress needs to step up and have "an honest investigation."
I hope you're all resting comfortably on your fainting couches before you read this next bit, but it turns out that Republicans DON'T AGREE with Rep. Nadler that it's time for "an honest investigation" into Donald Trump's collusion with and possible (ahem) personal compromisation by the Russians.

My favorite is the loathsome Sen. John Thune, who ran to Fox News to disgorge his execrable talking points:
"I don't think at this point that there has been anything that, in any way, changes the landscape, so to speak, where the president is concerned," Thune said in an interview with Fox News Thursday. "He has argued all along there wasn't any collusion on the part of his campaign team or his administration with Russia. And I haven't seen anything that disproves that."

Thune added that the Mueller probe should be thorough and complete, but can't go on forever. He said Trump has important work to do for the American people and it is time to "move on."

"And the longer these things drag on, it just, it gets, I think, very wearing on the American people," he said. "The report needs to come out. We need to know what happened, but I agree with my colleagues that the time I think has come to start drawing this to a conclusion."
The unmitigated temerity of this fucking guy! As if the Republican Party really gives two fucks about what wears on the American people. (If they did, they wouldn't spend their time passing massive tax cuts for the wealthy and destroying the social safety net.) The reason Thune wants the probe to end now is because it hasn't directly implicated anyone in the White House which would oblige the Republican Party to take down their own president or permanently implode their party in a refusal to hold accountable an Oval Office traitor from their ranks.

That the probe has lasted as long as it has, has only served Republicans, giving them egregious amounts of time to consolidate their power behind Donald Trump. They lost the House in the midterms, which was a big blow for them and a big success for us, but they continue to orchestrate their takeover via the federal courts every day.

They've wasted no time, despite their transparent complaints about the duration of Mueller's probe, and I sure hope to fuck that Mueller hasn't been wasting any time, either.

Open Wide...

It's Not Just You

If you're having problems reading and/or leaving comments, you're not alone. Disqus is being glitchy at the moment. We're not the only site having trouble, so fingers crossed that Disqus will resolve whatever is causing the problem quickly.

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Zelda the Black and Tan Mutt sitting in the garden in front of a pink flowering bush with her head turned to one side
Noble mutt. ♥

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 679

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Earlier today by me: Cohen Reaches New Plea Deal with Mueller and Republicans Think People Aren't Entitled to Food and Russian Aggression Toward Ukraine Continues.

Here are some more things in the news today...

Maegan Vazquez at CNN: Trump Abruptly Cancels Planned Putin Meeting. "Donald Trump on Thursday abruptly canceled his meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, which was scheduled to occur during a G20 meeting in Buenos Aires. 'Based on the fact that the ships and sailors have not been returned to Ukraine from Russia, I have decided it would be best for all parties concerned to cancel my previously scheduled meeting [...] in Argentina with President Vladimir Putin. I look forward to a meaningful Summit again as soon as this situation is resolved!' Trump tweeted en route to the summit."

Whatever the reason Trump canceled this meeting, it isn't because he suddenly started giving a fuck about Ukraine.

* * *

Harry Litman at the Washington Post: The Stunning Implications of the Manafort-Trump Pipeline.
Finally, the open pipeline between cooperator Manafort and suspect Trump may have been not only extraordinary but also criminal. On Manafort and Downing's end, there is a circumstantial case for obstruction of justice. What purpose other than an attempt to "influence, obstruct, or impede" the investigation of the president can be discerned from Manafort's service as a double agent? And on the Trump side, the communications emit a strong scent of illegal witness tampering (and possibly obstruction as well).

Proving those charges would require a fight. The lawyers would be expected to assert privilege, and cries of overreach would sound from the White House and pro-Trump journalists. Whitaker could impede or countermand the effort.

But it's critical to understand the stakes of the battle. Even more than the president's potential criminal liability, there is a set of burning questions about exactly what happened in 2016, the extent to which Russian efforts to influence the presidential election found purchase in the United States, and what part was played by high-level Trump campaign officials or the president himself.

It is intolerable to consider that the truth of these consequential matters would be smothered and kept from the American people indefinitely. But that's exactly what the president's overall strategy aims to do, and with the support, at least tacitly, of a complicit still-Republican-majority — for now — Congress. Is there no one in the GOP with the guts to stand up to the president and the resolve to see that the truth will out?
Possibly. But I suspect if there is, with the exception of Bob Muller (who is, as far as I know, still a Republican), it's not because they have any respect for the truth, the rule of law, or anything else, but because they are interested in filling the power vacuum that will be left if Trump is removed.

Meanwhile: Kate Sullivan at CNN: Trump Threatens to Declassify 'Devastating' Documents If Democrats 'Want to Play Tough'.
Donald Trump said that if Democrats "want to play tough" when they control the House of Representatives next year, he will declassify documents that will be "devastating" to them.

"If they want to play tough, I will do it," Trump told the New York Post in an interview Wednesday. "They will see how devastating those pages are."

Democrats are poised to launch a series of investigations after winning a majority in the House in November. Democratic-controlled committees are likely to probe a range of issues including Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, Michael Cohen's payments to women who say they've had affairs with Trump (allegations he denies), potential obstruction of justice, and Trump's finances.

The President told the Post he wants to save the documents for when he can use them against the Democrats most effectively. "It's much more powerful if I do it then," Trump told the Post, "because if we had done it already, it would already be yesterday's news."

It's not clear what documents he is referring to.

It's an escalation of what Trump told reporters on November 7 after Democrats had retaken control of the House during the midterm elections.

During that post-midterm news conference, Trump said that if Democrats start investigating his administration then he would be moving to "a warlike posture."

When asked by a reporter if he would show Democrats that he could could "play that game and investigate" Democrats, Trump said, "Oh, yeah. Better than them."
To be clear: That's just the President of the United States threatening to retributively declassify documents to hurt the opposition party for doing the job they were elected to do of providing checks and balances on the executive branch, currently held by a vengeful crook.

Mueller, if you are in it to win it, then hurry the fuck up before we fall off the authoritarian cliff without a goddamned rope.

Relatedly:


Also potentially related: Melissa Eddy and Amie Tsang at the New York Times: Deutsche Bank Offices Are Searched in Money Laundering Investigation. "One hundred seventy officers searched the headquarters of Deutsche Bank in Frankfurt and five other sites in the area early Thursday as part of a money-laundering investigation involving hundreds of millions of euros, prosecutors in Frankfurt said. Two employees, who were not publicly identified but whose ages were given as 50 and 46, and other 'unidentified people in positions of authority' are suspected of failing to report possible money laundering for transactions worth 311 million euros, or more than $350 million."

* * *

[Content Note: Climate change] While Trump continues to blather dangerous nonsense about how his giant brain and magical gut don't believe the grim assessments about climate change, climate change is nonetheless very, terrifyingly real.

Fiona Harvey at the Guardian: Past Four Years Hottest on Record, Data Shows.
Global temperatures have continued to rise in the past 10 months, with 2018 expected to be the fourth warmest year on record.

Average temperatures around the world so far this year were nearly 1C (1.8F) above pre-industrial levels. Extreme weather has affected all continents, while the melting of sea ice and glaciers and rises in sea levels continue. The past four years have been the hottest on record, and the 20 warmest have occurred in the past 22 years.

The warming trend is unmistakable and shows we are running out of time to tackle climate change, according to the World Meteorological Organization, which on Thursday published its provisional statement on the State of the Climate in 2018. The WMO warned that, on current trends, warming could reach 3C to 5C by the end of this century.

"These are more than just numbers," said Elena Manaenkova, the WMO deputy secretary general. "Every fraction of a degree of warming makes a difference to human health and access to food and fresh water, to the extinction of animals and plants, to the survival of coral reefs and marine life."
Sob.

* * *

[CN: Anti-semitism; terrorism] Trump's campaign of stochastic terrorism continues to inspire acts of hatred and terror. Wes Parnell and John Annese at the New York Daily News: Holocaust Scholar at Teachers College, Columbia University Finds Swastikas Spray-Painted on Her Office Wall. "A Jewish professor and Holocaust scholar at Columbia Teacher's College said she found two swastikas and an anti-Semitic slur spray-painted on her office wall Wednesday. Elizabeth Midlarsky said she first saw the hate symbols, which included the word 'YID' scrawled on a wall outside her office, when she arrived at work at the Ivy League campus at about 1 p.m. 'I walked in the door of my office and found myself staring at a swastika and was absolutely shocked,' Midlarsky said. She said the graffiti also left her students rattled, and in tears."

[CN: Anti-choice terrorism] Madeleine Schmidt at Rewire.News: 'Nothing Has Changed': Colorado Planned Parenthood Official on Anti-Choice Rhetoric Three Years After Shooting. "It's been three years since a shooter, who would later repeat talking points from an anti-choice propaganda campaign, walked into a Planned Parenthood clinic in Colorado and killed three people. Dr. Savita Ginde, the clinic's medical director at the time of the shooting, warns the anti-choice movement's violent rhetoric still poses a grave threat to providers and patients who seek reproductive health care. ...The anti-choice movement has been quick to distance itself from overtly violent acts by those opposed to abortion rights, but Ginde asserts the shooting serves as an example of how the movement's intentionally inflammatory rhetoric can lead to a deadly result."

[CN: Homophobia; misogyny] Andy Towle at Towleroad: Gay Firefighter Sues, Says He Was Demoted, Relocated, and Addressed as 'Ms' After Marrying Boyfriend. "A gay firefighter is suing the City of Norfolk, Virginia, alleging discrimination and retaliation based on his sexual orientation. Scott Phillips-Gartner said in the complaint that his chief treated him far less favorably when he learned he was married to a man. The Virginian-Pilot reports: 'The suit alleges Phillips-Gartner was well regarded in the department until October 2014, when he notified the city's human resources department he had married his boyfriend. The suit said Battalion Chief Roger Burris verbally attacked Gartner throughout 2015 and generally treated him less favorably than heterosexual male employees. During a staff meeting that December, he specifically attacked Gartner's sexuality, asking 'Where is Ms. Gartner?''"

[CN: Addiction; self-harm; lack of access to healthcare] I read the following two stories back-to-back, and all I can say, once again, is that I don't know how people who don't treat healthcare as a right live with themselves: 1. Lenny Bernstein at the Washington Post: U.S. Life Expectancy Declines Again, a Dismal Trend Not Seen Since World War I. 2. Elham Khatami at ThinkProgress: U.S. Rate of Uninsured Children Increases for the First Time in Nearly a Decade.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

Russian Aggression Toward Ukraine Continues

[Background: Part One; Part Two.]

Russia's aggression toward Ukraine is frighteningly escalating:

Two Ukrainian Azov Sea ports, Berdyansk and Mariupol, are effectively under blockade by Russia as vessels are being barred from leaving and entering, Ukraine's infrastructure minister, Volodymyr Omelyan, said on Thursday.

Overall, 35 vessels have been prevented from carrying out normal operations and only vessels moving towards Russian ports on the Azov Sea are permitted entry, he said on Facebook.

"The goal is simple: By placing a blockade on Ukrainian ports on the Azov Sea, Russia hopes to drive Ukraine out of our own territory — territory that is ours in accordance with all relevant international laws," he said.

Omelyan said 18 vessels were awaiting entry into the Azov Sea, including four to Berdyansk and 14 to Mariupol. There is also a line of nine vessels to leave the Azov Sea and eight other vessels are standing by near the port berths.

Grain and steel dominates the Azov ports shipments.
This is extremely troubling. The blockade is not only intended to drive Ukraine out of their own territory, but also to grievously harm the Ukrainian economy.

And I am gasping at the dire symbolism of preventing ships carrying grain from porting during an act of aggression which coincided, not coincidentally, with Ukraine's designated remembrance of the Holodomor, during which millions of Ukrainians were starved by Joseph Stalin.

This is intolerable.

Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko is urging NATO to send ships to the area "to assist Ukraine and provide security."
Ukraine is not a NATO member, but the trans-Atlantic group has expressed "full support" for the country. "We cannot accept this aggressive policy of Russia," Poroshenko told Germany's Bild. "First it was Crimea, then eastern Ukraine, now he wants the Sea of Azov. Germany, too, has to ask itself: What will Putin do next if we do not stop him?"
The international community must endeavor to prevent having to find out the answer to that question.

Open Wide...

Republicans Think People Aren't Entitled to Food

[Content Note: Class warfare.]

My oft-repeated observation that Republicans think people aren't entitled to food emerged from the swamp of despair that was Mitt Romney's 2012 "47 Percent" video, from which I teased out what I thought was its most overlooked aspect: That Romney, a U.S. presidential candidate, believed people aren't entitled to food.

At the time, I got the usual pushback: I was being hyperbolic, it was just inelegant wording, surely he didn't actually believe that, etc.

Oh but he actually did — and does still. And so does his party.

This alarmist spent the next few years collecting receipts under the label: "Republicans Think People Aren't Entitled to Food."

Over the course of the last six years, what's evident in that series is that the Republican Party has become less inclined to hide that this is indeed their position.

They have gotten very blunt about the fact that a Republican-led government is a government willing to starve its own people.

Care of Kentucky Representative Thomas Massie, here's a pretty stunning entry in the series:


In case you can't view the embedded tweet, or he ever has the decency to delete it, the tweet reads: "How long until someone runs on the platform of #FoodStampsForAll? If healthcare is a right, is food as well?"

YES.

Yes it is.

That there are elected officials who even consider that debatable makes me incandescently angry.

[H/T to Scott Madin.]

Open Wide...

Cohen Reaches New Plea Deal with Mueller

ABC News' George Stephanopoulos reports this morning: "Michael Cohen, [Donald] Trump's former personal attorney, reaches new plea deal with Mueller this morning. Expected to enter guilty plea for false statements to Congress coupled with dozens of hours of testimony potentially damaging to [Donald] Trump — Special Counsel values testimony."

Welp.

It's good that Michael Cohen is being held accountable for his lying, if not for his despicable service to the traitorous Donald Trump, whose interpersonal and political abuses Cohen abetted for years.

At least it's something.

Which is what I feel like I keep saying each time one of these dudes strikes a deal with Mueller — Papadopoulos, Manafort, Cohen. At least it's something.

But it's never enough.

Considering the reverberating vastness of their crimes, I don't even know what would be.

Anyway. Between Manafort, who's due back in court tomorrow for breaching his plea deal, and Cohen, who's about to enter a guilty plea, it's pretty clear that Mueller has caught all of them, including Trump himself, in a number of lies. Will that have eventual consequences, even if inadequate ones, for Trump, too? I sure hope so.

Trump, for his part, retweeted an image of his "enemies" in prison with text reading: "Now that Russia collusion is a proven lie, when do the trials for treason begin?" Included among his imprisoned "enemies" in the image is Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. In case the tweet is removed, here is the image that Trump retweeted:

image as described above

When the New York Post asked Trump why he believes Rosenstein belongs in prison, Trump replied: "He should have never picked a Special Counsel."

Wow.

Meanwhile, as Mueller's investigation into Russian collusion has now resulted in Trump's personal attorney pleading guilty, the Kremlin is giving Trump his marching orders in public, announcing that Trump and Putin will meet one-on-one at the G-20 summit, privately, for at least two hours.

The collusion has always been, and continues to be, right out in the open.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of a yellow couch

Hosted by a yellow sofa. Have a seat and chat.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Suggested by Shaker FloraFlora: "Favorite food combination that other people may find odd?"

White rice with ketchup. Specifically: Very hot rice with very cold ketchup. Which was something I used to eat as a kid, so now it feels like a comfort food on the extremely rare occasions when I eat it.

Open Wide...

Wednesday Links!

This list o' links brought to you by mints.

Recommended Reading:

Soraya Chemaly at Dame: [Content Note: Sexual harassment; objectification; misogyny] What Men Need to Know About Sexist Microaggressions

Jamil Smith at Rolling Stone: [CN: Gun violence; anti-Blackness; police brutality] The 'Good Guy with the Gun' Is Never Black

Ragen Chastain at Dances with Fat: [CN: Fat hatred; privacy violations] Taking Pics of Fat People on Planes

Adam Serwer at the Atlantic: How Creed Forever Changed the Rocky Series

Martine Thompson with Dr. Moya Bailey at Bon Appetit: 'Misogynoir' Coiner Moya Bailey Is Eating Pasta and Channeling Her Inner Black Auntie

Kaiser at Celebitchy: [CN: Racism] Is Green Book Actually a Really Problematic Film About Race?

David Roth at the Concourse: Please Enjoy This Enormous Australian Cow

Leave your links and recommendations in comments. Self-promotion welcome and encouraged!

Open Wide...

An Observation

"Controversial" is a word that has long been used by the press to cover all manner of sins — and to maintain an illusion of objectivity by not taking a side on the "controversy," as though not condemning abuse is a neutral position. But its current service to bothsideserism is exponentially gross.

Donald Trump and the various members of his vile administration are not "controversial figures." His policies of malice are not "controversial." People in power who perpetrate abuse and the people who object to it and/or are harmed by it are not two sides of a "controversy."

Using "controversy" (or "debate," or variations thereof) to affect neutrality is bullshit. There is no neutral in Trump's vast abuses. There is only condemning and resisting it, or abetting it, either actively or passively.

It takes some hefty denial to manage to convince oneself that weasel words like "controversy" are somehow superior to the complicity of silence.

[Also on Twitter, beginning here.]

Open Wide...

Shaker Gourmet

Whatcha been cooking up in your kitchen lately, Shakers?

Share your favorite recipes, solicit good recipes, share recipes you've recently tried, want to try, are trying to perfect, whatever! Whether they're your own creation, or something you found elsewhere, share away.

Also welcome: Recipes you've seen recently that you'd love to try, but haven't yet!

* * *

I don't have any new recipes to share, but here is a picture of some delicious stuff I made with Iain and Deeks for Thanksgiving dinner!

image of a plate with a turkey drumstick, some sliced turkey breast, and a few side dishes

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Dudley the Greyhound standing on the back patio with leaves blowing around him, squinting into the wind
"Dang, it's windy AF out here!"

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...