Is Facebook Worth It?

This New York Times article about Facebook's responses to Trump's and Russian actors' misuse of social media, and its platform specifically, is really something.

Following revelations that Facebook allowed private company Cambridge Analytica, linked to Republican candidates, to access its users' personal information:

Facebook employed a Republican opposition-research firm to discredit activist protesters, in part by linking them to the liberal financier George Soros. It also tapped its business relationships, persuading a Jewish civil rights group to cast some criticism of the company as anti-Semitic.
Given the data that millions of Americans freely give to Facebook, it's alarming to think of the extent to which Facebook could also leverage that data to discredit its critics, should they want to do so.

 In addition (emphasis added):
...Russian hackers appeared to be probing Facebook accounts for people connected to the presidential campaigns, said two employees. Months later, as Mr. Trump battled Hillary Rodham Clinton in the general election, the team also found Facebook accounts linked to Russian hackers who were messaging journalists to share information from the stolen emails.

Mr. Stamos, 39, told Colin Stretch, Facebook's general counsel, about the findings, said two people involved in the conversations. At the time, Facebook had no policy on disinformation or any resources dedicated to searching for it.
Facebook is a multi-billion dollar social media company founded in 2004. It's phenomenally shameful that no one there leaned into creating and implementing a "policy on disinformation," particularly since Facebook has more resources than most to put into doing so.

To take a step back, I remember in the 1990s, when the Internet was still new, at least for most ordinary folks, and many people were extremely skeptical of information that "came from the Internet." That culture has changed quite a bit. Now, it seems that many people will concede that misinformation exists on the Internet; it just exists on platforms other than the ones they use.

To be clear, I think misinformation and disinformation is more prominent on the political right in the USA. But Facebook as a platform is interesting in that it is used widely by people across the political spectrum and 81% of the public is reported to lack confidence in the company after the Cambridge Analytica scandal.

What I've been wondering for awhile now, as well, is for how long people will find reasons to continue to use Facebook, given the other options that exist for connecting — and given Facebook's increasingly visible bad faith practices. It seems that a lot of the continued use boils down to the lukewarm sentiment that "everyone else is on it and it's an easy way to get in touch with people," and, as more people begin to abandon or close their accounts, that habit will become easy to break.

My personal experience of the site is that, in addition to the national security and personal privacy concerns, and this might be too misanthropic, being connected to people necessarily involves being connected to..... people. Over-sharing, gullible, endlessly-arguing, irritating people. Frankly put, many people use Facebook for reasons that I don't care to. I don't enjoy or trust getting political information from Facebook users. Political debate on the site can become a completely hellish thing to have to monitor. And for photo-sharing and messaging, other options exist.

If dwindling personal use doesn't critically threaten Facebook's current model, something else needs to happen. I'm not arguing that the government should shut down Facebook. Regulate it, yes.

But I wonder if that time will come, or if users will drift away from Facebook when they realize that the cons of using a platform that engages in such unethical business practices aren't worth whatever benefits they get from it.

Open Wide...

Saudi Prosecutor Says Team Dispatched to Rendition Khashoggi Killed Him

[Content Note: Murder.]

Saudi Arabia's public prosecutor Saud al-Mojeb has announced the findings of his investigation into the death of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, and his conclusions are curious, to say the least.

Kareem Fahim and Zakaria Zakaria at the Washington Post report:

[The prosecutor asserts] that a team of Saudi agents who had been dispatched to Istanbul with orders to bring him home alive had instead killed the journalist and dismembered his body.

Saudi Arabia's crown prince had no knowledge of the operation, Shaalan al-Shaalan, a spokesman for the prosecutor, said at a news conference in Riyadh, the Saudi capital.

He said that 11 suspects had been indicted and that authorities were seeking the death penalty for five of them. The order to kill Khashoggi, who had criticized the Saudi monarchy over the past year, had come from the leader of the Saudi team in Istanbul, Shaalan said without naming any of the suspects.

...Al-Mojeb's statement on Thursday implicated two higher-level officials in what the prosecutor said was an operation intended either to persuade or force Khashoggi to return to Saudi Arabia.

...The Saudi prosecutor's version of events on Thursday — that Khashoggi was killed during a fight with the Saudi agents, who administered a lethal injection — contradicted the findings of Turkish investigators, who have said Khashoggi was strangled or suffocated soon after he entered the consulate, in a premeditated killing.
The main thrust of the prosecutor's statements seems to be that Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman had nothing to do with it. Left unanswered is why a team dispatched with orders to bring someone home alive would happen to have a bonesaw on hand.

The prosecutor also provided no information on the whereabouts of Khashoggi's remains.

This entire charade is transparent bullshit. I don't know what else to say about it besides that. I remain so sad and so angry for Khashoggi's family, friends, and colleagues. They are not only being denied justice; they are being denied even the truth.

Open Wide...

This Is Making Me Filthy Angry

[Content Note: Misogyny; ageism.]

Matt Fuller at the Huffington Post reports the latest on Democrats who want to deny Nancy Pelosi the speakership:

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi is suddenly in a fight for her political survival as a group of Democratic detractors is preparing to block her ascent to the speakership.

About a dozen incumbent Democrats and a half-dozen incoming Democrats are preparing a letter pledging to not support Pelosi on the House floor for speaker. The members also intend to note another contingent of Democrats who privately say they won’t support the longtime California Democrat but won’t sign the letter, according to Rep. Tim Ryan (D-Ohio), one of the ringleaders of the effort to block Pelosi.

Sources familiar with the letter say there are currently 17 names on it, but the group is trying to get more than 20 members before releasing it. Currently on the letter, though not certain to stay on it, are:

- Tim Ryan (D-Ohio)
- Seth Moulton (D-Mass.)
- Kathleen Rice (D-N.Y.)
- Ed Perlmutter (D-Colo.)
- Kurt Schrader (D-Ore.)
- Filemon Vela Jr. (D-Texas)
- Marcia Fudge (D-Ohio)
- Bill Foster (D-Ill.)
- Brian Higgins (D-N.Y.)
- Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.)
- Linda Sanchez (D-Calif.)
- Jim Cooper (D-Tenn.)
- Jeff Van Drew (D-N.J.)
- Joe Cunningham (D-S.C.)
- Max Rose (D-N.Y.)
- Anthony Brindisi (D-N.Y.)
- Ben McAdams (D-Utah)

There is another contingent of Democrats ― including Conor Lamb (D-Pa.), Dan Lipinksi (D-Ill.), Ron Kind (D-Wis.), Abigail Spanberger (D-Va.), Jason Crow (D-Colo.), Haley Stevens (D-Mich.), Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.), Mikie Sherrill (D-N.J.) and Andy Kim (D-N.J.) ― who are seen as likely to vote against Pelosi, but who also are hesitant to sign the letter.
A number of Pelosi foes don't want to go public officially, because they are goddamned cowards who know they have no legitimate reason to challenge Pelosi. They lurk in the shadows with nebulous talking points about "the establishment" and "effective leadership," the latter of which falls to absolute rubbish when Pelosi's actual record is discussed.

So they conceal their names and make the vaguest of arguments, relying on public hostility for any older woman seeking power to serve as the case they refuse to make.

Meanwhile, they're skulking around trying to bring other Democrats on board and claiming they have the numbers to defeat her, to force her out of the contest altogether:
Pelosi's allies all readily point out that "you can't beat somebody with nobody," but Pelosi's opponents are testing that idea. In fact, they seem to think their movement is strengthened without a clear alternative.

The idea is that, once Pelosi knows she can't win, she will step aside and there would be a new race for the speaker position.
Shady fucking cowards. They don't have the decency to just choose someone among their ranks to run against her fairly and squarely. Instead they want to push her out of the way in the most craven and undemocratic way possible.

Utterly shameful.


Additionally: If your biggest concern right now is keeping Nancy Pelosi out of power, you've really taken your eye off the ball.

These folks should be grateful they have someone as experienced and effective as Pelosi positioned to hit the ground running in opposition to Donald Trump and the Republicans. Instead, they're resisting her.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of a yellow couch

Hosted by a yellow sofa. Have a seat and chat.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Suggested by Shaker Suzy: "What's your go-to potluck dish?"

I always try to figure out the hole that needs to be filled — cold salad? hot vegetable? protein? dessert? — and then choose appropriately from my list of go-tos.

Often I discover the thing that's missing is something super kid-friendly, in which case I bring a big dish of homemade mac 'n cheese.

Open Wide...

Wednesday Links!

This list o' links brought to you by chicken soup.

Recommended Reading:

Megan Stielstra at the Believer: [Content Note: Rage; depression; bigotry; injustice; abuse] An Axe for the Frozen Sea

Monica Lewinsky at Vanity Fair: [CN: Abuse of power; misogyny] "Who Gets to Live in Victimville?": Why I Participated in a New Docuseries on The Clinton Affair

Monica Roberts at TransGriot: Happy Trans Awareness Week!

Dorothy Snarker at Dorothy Surrenders: Ride That Rainbow Wave

Rachel Leishman at the Mary Sue: Mark Hamill Thinks We Should Let Women Run the World and...Well, Yeah

Ali Carr Troxell at Outside: My Father's SOS — from the Middle of the Sea

Dana Beeman at Neatorama: 'Average People' on Treadmill Try to Run at Speed of Marathon World Winner

Sarah Sloat at Inverse: Video Shows How a Venus Flytrap Kill Is Like a Lightning Bolt

Leave your links and recommendations in comments. Self-promotion welcome and encouraged!

Open Wide...

What I'm Watching

This is a thread to share all the good things you're watching at the moment, or have recently watched. Serialized shows on broadcast or streaming; films; digital shorts; stand-up; documentaries; performances — whatever! Tell us what you're watching and enjoying these days.

Even though I mentioned it in comments two threads ago, I wanted to give a main page shout-out to Superstore, which is the lead-in to The Good Place every Thursday, and which I also really enjoy!

promotional image featuring some of the primary cast members of Superstore

It's regularly very funny, features a truly and meaningfully diverse cast led by the terrific America Ferrera (who is also a producer on the series), and is probably the best American sitcom straightforwardly addressing class issues outside of the white working class since Good Times.

I've shared previously that I tend to gravitate toward shows written by people who like and respect their characters. This is one of those shows.

It's the first season I've watched live: I binged the previous seasons on Hulu, if you're looking for a place to give it a try or get caught up.

Anyway! What are you watching these days?

Open Wide...

Shaker Gourmet

Whatcha been cooking up in your kitchen lately, Shakers?

Share your favorite recipes, solicit good recipes, share recipes you've recently tried, want to try, are trying to perfect, whatever! Whether they're your own creation, or something you found elsewhere, share away.

Also welcome: Recipes you've seen recently that you'd love to try, but haven't yet!

* * *

Just about to eat some leftovers of the chicken soup I made in the crockpot yesterday. It was a total "throw in whatever random stuff we've got" soup, because we're at the end of a grocery cycle, and it was delicious!

Unsalted chicken stock, a splash of cream, chicken breast, some crumbled bacon, beans, carrots, onions, mushrooms, kale, parsley, garlic, tomato paste, smoked paprika, black pepper, and salt. Yum!

image of a bowl of soup sitting on my kitchen counter
Not the greatest photo, but whatever — I'm hungry!

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Sophie the Torbie Cat sittign on a pile of pillows on the sofa
This little wisp and her bed of a thousand pillows!

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 664

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Earlier today by me: The Cost of Not Listening to Women, on the Women Not Listened To and Today in Misogyny Dressed Up as Revolution. And ICYMI late yesterday: Today in Trump's Campaign of Stochastic Terrorism.

Here are some more things in the news today...

[Content Note: Wildfires; death and displacement] Dani Anguiano and Gabrielle Canon at the Guardian: California Wildfires: Statewide Death Toll Rises to 50. "The statewide death toll in California's wildfires reached 50 late on Tuesday, as authorities reported six more deaths in the Camp fire in the north of the state. ...Authorities in northern California have ramped up the search for more victims buried in rubble left by the blaze that incinerated the town of Paradise [where] more than 200 people remain missing... Officials said earlier Tuesday that the fire had grown to 195 sq miles. Firefighters report that the fire is 35% contained and National Weather Service meteorologist Aviva Braun said early Tuesday that the high winds that helped spread the blaze have begun to diminish. Air quality in the area, which has been hazardous in recent days, is expected to worsen as light winds cause smoke to settle, Braun said."

Suggestions on ways to help can be found here. Please feel welcome and encouraged to suggest other ways to help in comments.

* * *

Kira Lerner at ThinkProgress: Abrams Campaign Wins Court Rulings as Push for a Runoff Election Continues. "A week after the midterm election left Georgia's gubernatorial race too close to call, Democrat Stacey Abrams is refusing to concede and the campaign is winning court orders, allowing the counting of votes to continue. Abrams hopes that Republican candidate Brian Kemp's vote total will drop below 50 percent, forcing a runoff in the race for Georgia's governor's mansion. In a ruling late Monday, a federal judge in Atlanta ordered Georgia to ensure that provisional ballots aren't unlawfully rejected and to wait until Friday to certify the election results."

As I said yesterday: "I'm hearing an awful lot of 'Beto 2020!' stuff, and the longer Abrams fights, the more I wonder why it isn't 'Abrams 2020!' that's dominating my social media. Because it damn well should be."

In other Democratic Women Getting It Done news...

Jeff Cox at CNBC: Maxine Waters Says Easing Banking Regulations 'Will Come to an End' When She Takes Committee Chair. "Rep. Maxine Waters, poised to take over the powerful House Financial Services Committee when the new Congress convenes in January, laid down the law Wednesday about the future of banking regulation. Speaking ahead of remarks by Randal Quarles, the Federal Reserve's vice chair of oversight for the banking industry, the California Democrat said efforts to loosen the reins on Wall Street financial institutions won't be tolerated should she be committee chair, as expected. 'Make no mistake, come January, in this committee the days of this committee weakening regulations and putting our economy once again at risk of another financial crisis will come to an end,' Waters said."

Rebecca Traister at the Cut: 46 Minutes with Barbara Lee. "Lee is running for chair of the House Democratic Caucus, the party's No. 5 leadership role, held most recently by Joe Crowley. ...Lee is no purist and believes in the mechanisms of power, leverage, and, sometimes, compromise. She sees a path forward for progressives — not outside the system, as she used to believe, but by making use of it. Even without the Senate, her party's return to the House majority will enable it, she says, to pursue a 'bold legislative agenda.' She wants to reduce health-care and prescription-drug costs, present an infrastructure bill that would create good jobs with high wages, and 'retake the role of oversight and investigation' with regard to corruption in the Trump administration."

Senator Dianne Feinstein (press release): Feinstein Calls for Judiciary Committee Hearings with Whitaker, Sessions. "Senate Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) today called on Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) to quickly call committee hearings with Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker and fired Attorney General Jeff Sessions. ...In that letter, Feinstein wrote: 'The circumstances surrounding Attorney General Sessions' departure raise serious questions, including whether the appointment is lawful and the possible impact on Special Counsel Mueller's investigation.'"

It's almost like valuing and supporting experienced women know what the fuck they're doing results in good policy and oversight. Huh.

* * *

Meanwhile, on the other side of the aisle...


And: Marco Rubio at the Wall Street Journal: Trump Is Right About Nationalism. (As I noted on Twitter: "I don't know if it's more embarrassing for Marco Rubio that he wrote this heap of trash, or more embarrassing for the Wall Street Journal that they published it.")

And: Betsy Woodruff at the Daily Beast: Justice Department Memo Declares Matt Whitaker Appointment Is Legal. The same Justice Department which Matt Whitaker was just appointed to lead?! Oh.

At Daily Kos, Mark Sumner notes that the DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel's memo cites, as its only relevant example of an acting attorney general who was appointed by a president despite having not been previously confirmed by the Senate, the 1866 appointment of Henry Stanbery by President Andrew Jackson.
[Stanbery was] the man who defended Johnson at his impeachment trial. Johnson appointed Stanberry to attorney general without Senate approval. Which was actually a major factor in his impeachment.

After surviving impeachment by a single vote, Johnson reappointed Stanberry to be AG as a way of delivering a final groin kick to his opponents in the Senate. He then put Stanberry up for the Supreme Court. Rather than watch Johnson bypass them again, the Senate moved to reduce the number of seats on the Supreme Court to keep Stanberry out.

A near impeachment. A revolt in the Senate. Three Supreme Court seats sliced away. And that is the incident that Trump's DOJ is citing to explain why it's okay to make Matt Whitaker acting AG.
Fucking hell.

And finally on this subject...


No.

* * *

Paul Sonne and Shane Harris at the Washington Post: U.S. Military Edge Has Eroded to 'a Dangerous Degree,' Study for Congress Finds. "The United States has lost its military edge to a dangerous degree and could potentially lose a war against China or Russia, according to a report released Wednesday by a bipartisan commission that Congress created to evaluate the Trump administration's defense strategy. The National Defense Strategy Commission, comprised of former top Republican and Democratic officials selected by Congress, evaluated the Trump administration's 2018 National Defense Strategy, which ordered a vast reshaping of the U.S. military to compete with Beijing and Moscow in an era of renewed great-power competition."

The Trump Regime, of course, just wants more nukes and a space force. Preferably a space force armed with nukes. But what we really need, maybe more than anything else, is better preparation for cyberattacks.

Case in point: Ryan Browne at CNN: Russia Jammed GPS During Major NATO Military Exercise with U.S. Troops.
The Russian military jammed GPS signals during a major NATO military exercise in Norway that involved thousands of US and NATO troops, the alliance said Wednesday, citing the Norwegian government.

The NATO exercise, Trident Juncture, concluded Sunday and involved some 50,000 personnel. It was labeled the alliance's largest exercise since the Cold War. Non-NATO members Finland and Sweden also participated in the exercise.

A spokesperson for the Norwegian ministry of defense acknowledged the jamming to CNN, which it said took place between October 16 and November 7, and said it would defer to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on further questions to Russian authorities.

"Norway has determined that Russia was responsible for jamming GPS signals in the Kola Peninsula during Exercise Trident Juncture. Finland has expressed concern over possible jamming in Lapland," NATO spokesperson Oana Lungescu told CNN Wednesday.

"In view of the civilian usage of GPS, jamming of this sort is dangerous, disruptive and irresponsible," she added.

Asked about the report of Russian jamming, NATO's Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said the alliance was aware of the reports but did not offer additional information.
Well, shit.

Naturally, Trump might not care about Russia jamming military equipment, but, if Russia can do it, so can other countries he might be less inclined to forgive.

* * *

[CN: Homophobia; nativism] Andy Towle at Towleroad: LGBTQ Splinter Group from Migrant Caravan Is First to Arrive in Tijuana, Will Seek Asylum in U.S. "A group of LGBTQ migrants who split off from the main migrant caravan because of discrimination are the first to arrive in Tijuana, weeks ahead of the others. NPR reports: 'About 80 migrants, the majority of whom identify as LGBT, splintered off from the larger group in Mexico City after weeks of what they say was discriminatory treatment by local residents and other travelers, Honduran migrant Cesar Mejia told reporters at a news conference on Sunday. 'Whenever we arrived at a stopping point the LGBT community was the last to be taken into account in every way. So our goal was to change that and say, 'This time we are going to be first,'' Mejia said.' ...Most are planning to request asylum in the U.S. based on the fact that they are persecuted in their home countries, although Trump last week moved to restrict asylum for those crossing the border from Mexico."


Ian Millhiser at ThinkProgress: Supreme Court to Hear a Subtle But Terrifying Threat to Obamacare. "In a sensible world, Virginia House of Delegates v. Bethune-Hill would have nothing whatsoever to do with the Affordable Care Act. On its surface, Bethune-Hill is a racial gerrymandering case which, the Supreme Court announced on Tuesday, will be heard by the Court for the second time. Yet Bethune-Hill also presents a difficult issue regarding when non-parties to a federal lawsuit may appeal lower court decisions to a higher authority. And this technical question could have tremendous implications for Obamacare. Depending on how the Supreme Court rules in Bethune-Hill, this seemingly irrelevant gerrymandering dispute could enable the Trump administration to collude with a highly partisan judge to shut down the Affordable Care Act in a bevy of red states."

[CN: White supremacy] Danielle Corcione at Rewire.News: Hate Group Figures Are Coming to Philadelphia's Pro-Police Rally. "Prominent far-right figures and fascist groups are planning to come to Philadelphia on November 17, when local right-wing organizers, including those affiliated with white supremacist groups, are expected to congregate at a 'We The People' rally in the city's historic district. Many Philadelphians aren't welcoming these organizations. ...The rally is slated for Independence Hall, steps away from the National Museum of American Jewish History." Rage seethe boil.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

Today in Misogyny Dressed Up as Revolution

I've really just about had it with the "anti-establishment" Dems, by all the different names they go.

In particular, this juxtaposition is doing my head in today:

1. NBC News' Frank Thorp V reports on Twitter: "Sen Chuck Schumer (D-NY) has been re-elected to be Senate Minority Leader by acclamation, per a source familiar."

2. Bo Erickson and Rebecca Kaplan at CBS News: Anti-Pelosi Democrats Confident They Can Keep Her from Becoming House Speaker Again. Of course.

My favorite (cough) line from that article: "The group isn't backing or putting forward an alternative to Pelosi; their sole aim is to ensure she's not elected speaker."

Cool.

During a conversation with the other mods about the "anti-establishment" Dems yesterday, I said: "If you're going to 'tear down the establishment,' you'd better be prepared to build and lead its replacement. These fucking dipshits are clearly unprepared to do either."

Proving me right, over and over.

Also pissing me off is this headline at Talking Points Memo: Pelosi Launches Speakership Charm Offensive, Schmoozes Members-Elect.

How to make BEING A TALENTED AND EFFECTIVE POLITICIAN sound like being a shitty con artist instead. Thanks a heapload, TPM.

Men are savvy politicians playing 12-dimensional chess. Old (experienced) women are shady, inauthentic creeps who must be stopped. Rinse and repeat ad infinitum.

Open Wide...

The Cost of Not Listening to Women, on the Women Not Listened To

[Content Note: Misogyny.]

This is (partly) why I'm so exhausted.

On Monday, I published a brief thread on Twitter about the phenomenon of people being inclined to believe everyone else but Hillary Clinton on the subject of Hillary Clinton. (This was after everyone lost their shit about a report she would run again in 2020, which was based on a rumor started by men who no longer work for her and haven't for a long time.) This was the thread in its entirety:

I was never a Hillary Clinton hater, but there was a time I wasn't a huge fan. It's remarkable how dramatically my opinion (and understanding) of her changed once I started listening *to her* instead of relying on news and opinion filtered through other people's opinions of her.

I have never, in the decades I have been closely following and then professionally writing about politics, seen a more vast divide between who a politician actually is and who they are (mis)represented to be than the one Hillary Clinton is obliged to try to navigate every day.

And the thing about that is that I also have never seen a politician whose life and thoughts are so abundantly accessible [as] Hillary Clinton's, from decades of her personal finances being made public to the unrivaled number of policy papers she has published and made available.

It is genuinely extraordinary that people are still so aggressively mistaken about her positions and personality. I can always tell when someone's made the effort to listen to her, even her critics and people who despise her, vs. people who insulate themselves from her own words.

Anyway. I strongly advise, as we enter another presidential campaign, that people make the effort to listen to candidates directly and *read their policy papers*. It's easier to access this stuff than ever w/o any media filter. Go to the source. Form your own opinions.

And if you're going to rely on commenters, trust those who provide you with the raw video and/or transcripts. (Yes, I'm bragging.) Take their (our) word only insofar as it helps you understand what you also see with your own eyes.
Despite the fact I have written sentiments like this countless times over the last decade, this thread went viral. As of this writing, it has been retweeted 6,663 times and liked 36,805 times. It also has over a thousand tweeted responses.

Many of those responses came from people who are super pissed that I would throw my support behind Hillary Clinton running again in 2020.

Blink. Blink.

Readers, you may have noticed that I did not mention, even obliquely, Hillary Clinton running again in 2020. I did mention the 2020 campaign, because I expect that there will be at least one woman running, and possibly more, and, in anticipation of that eventuality, I wanted to urge people not to treat those female candidates like they treated the last one.

You see, despite the endless protestations to the contrary, I don't believe that Hillary Clinton was subjected to mountainous heaps of misogyny because she's Hillary Clinton. I believe — I know — it's because she's a woman.

And every other women will somehow be too imperfect to deserve the robust support of misogynists, too, who cannot be allowed to claim that their universal bias is individualized.

So I did another thread this morning:
It's remarkable how many people have responded to this thread with hostility at my argument for a Hillary 2020 run, despite the fact such advocacy appears nowhere in this thread. A perfect and terrible example of the trouble lots of folks have actually listening to ANY women.

In 14 years of being a woman publicly writing about politics, the amount of shit I've taken based on *things I didn't even say* is colossal.

A lot of it, of course, is people willfully misconstruing what I've written in order to justify throwing abuse at me, because they don't like my politics or don't like me. But a lot of it is also people just reading shit that truly *isn't even there*.

Because one of the symptoms of not truly listening to women is projecting your own shit onto women who speak publicly. In the gaps left by that *not listening*, people fill in their own stuff — often to create a space for the arguments they want to have.

And holy shit does it get tiring being A Generic Avatar for people who want to fight with a progressive feminist woman. I choose my words so thoughtfully and so carefully and so particularly. And then people don't read and/or listen, and yell at me for shit I didn't even say.

Listen to women. I mean *really* listen to them. Actively, patiently, thoughtfully listen to the words women use. This casual carelessness about what women actually say and write underwriting relentless hostility toward us is exhausting.
Immediately, without a trace of irony, came the responses suggesting it must be something other than misogyny. Like, it's just Hillary Clinton. Or like, maybe I'm too stupid to know it's just bots. (As if the same thing hasn't been happening here in comments for 14 years.)

I added one final tweet to my thread: "And now comes the 'splaining and Occam's Big Paisley Tie-ing at me that it must be something other than misogyny, because isn't it always."

Isn't it always.

There is a larger cultural cost to not listening to women, whether it's not listening to women urgently warning about how dangerous a presidential candidate and his party really are, or not listening to women about sexual violence, or not listening to women on any other topic, choosing instead to ignore, disbelieve, marginalize, harass, and gaslight us.

There's also a personal cost to the women who aren't listened to. We are haunted by the things we did say being ignored, and we are tired, so very tired, of being harassed for things we never said.

Open Wide...

It's Delightful, It's Delicious, It's De-Lovely...

...it's De-lurk Day! We haven't had one of these in a very long time, so all you Shaker lurkers who rarely or never pipe up, don't be shy; say hi!

image of me concealing half my face
Cheeky devils!

And, as always, no one should feel obliged to stop lurking. These threads are a meant as a safe and easy space for people who do lurk to pop in if they want to, and some people have used them as a springboard to regular commenting, but that doesn't have to be the case at all.

Lurking is one of many ways to be part of this community, and if lurking feels best to you — lurk away! lurk away! :)

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of a red couch

Hosted by a red sofa. Have a seat and chat.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Suggested by Shaker lattendicht: "What's your preferred mode of transport?"

This is such a boring answer, but I like whatever mode of transport makes the most sense. When I have lived in a city, I preferred to walk when possible, or use public transportation when walking wasn't an option. When I have lived in the suburbs or exurbs, I preferred to use a car. When I travel long distances, I tend to prefer whatever gets me there fastest, whether it's a plane or a train or a boat or a car. Unless, of course, the whole point is, say, to do a road trip or see the countryside from the window of a train.

Really the only modes of transport I tend to avoid are ones that require physical exertion — bikes, scooters, skates, etc. — not because I don't love doing those things (I do!), but because my hypohidrosis makes them impossible for longer than a few minutes, except impractically slowly in very cool weather.

Open Wide...

Discussion Thread: Self-Care

What are you doing to do to take care of yourself today, or in the near future, as soon as you can?

If you are someone who has a hard time engaging in self-care, or figuring out easy, fast, and/or inexpensive ways to treat yourself, and you would like to solicit suggestions, please feel welcome. And, as always, no one should offer advice unless it is solicited.

* * *

I am going to watch reruns of The Good Place as soon as I have some free time, because that show just makes me ridiculously happy.

image of actors William Jackson Harper and Kristen Bell in character as Chidi and Eleanor; Bell has a big iguana sitting on her lap

This photo is currently the wallpaper on my phone, and it just makes me grin every time I look at it.

In related Good Place news, Mary Steenburgen talking about how much she loves her husband Ted Danson (who plays Michael) is probably the cutest thing you'll read all day, if you need to read cute things as part of your self-care.
Among the other qualities Steenburgen says she loves about Danson are that he's "a feminist," he's passionate about protecting the world's oceans, and that she misses him when he leaves the room — "I would literally sign up for 100 more lifetimes with him," she says.
I MEAN. ♥

Open Wide...

Today in Trump's Campaign of Stochastic Terrorism

[Content Note: Hate crimes; stochastic terrorism.]

Since the day he announced his candidacy for president, Donald Trump has been waging a campaign of stochastic terrorism, rhetorically putting targets on the backs of marginalized people and hoping that shamelessly violent wrecks among his cultists will do the rest.

Well, the results are in. And his campaign is working.

Devlin Barrett at the Washington Post: Hate Crimes Rose 17 Percent Last Year, According to New FBI Data.

Hate crimes in America rose 17 percent last year, the third consecutive year that such crimes increased, according to newly released FBI data that showed an even larger increase in anti-Semitic attacks.
That is, not coincidentally, the same three-year period in which Donald Trump has been a national candidate and then president, during which time he has repeatedly engaged in anti-Semitism.
Law enforcement agencies reported 7,175 hate crimes occurred in 2017, up from 6,121 in 2016. That increase was fueled in part by more police departments reporting hate crime data to the FBI, but overall there is still a large number of departments that report no hate crimes to the federal database.

The sharp increase in hate crimes in 2017 came even as overall violent crime in America fell slightly, by 0.2 percent, after increases in 2015 and 2016.
Note that Trump routinely asserts that violent crime is rising, as part of his campaign of stochastic terrorism. He lies about the prevalence of violent crime and scapegoats marginalized people — overtly accusing undocumented immigrants of being criminals and typically using dogwhistles about gun violence in Chicago, Philadelphia, etc. to accuse Black people of being criminals.
More than half of hate crimes, about 3 out of every 5, targeted a person's race or ethnicity, while about 1 out of 5 targeted their religion.

Of the more than 7,000 incidents reported last year, 2,013 targeted black Americans, while 938 targeted Jewish Americans. Incidents targeting people for their sexual orientation accounted for 1,130 hate crimes, according to the FBI.
It's important to note here that many undocumented immigrants do not report hate crimes, for fear of being deported. That fear has undoubtedly increased significantly since Trump has instituted his obscene nativist agenda.

It's also important to note that misogynist violence, including sexual assault, is rarely counted in hate crimes statistics — even though calls to the National Sexual Assault Hotline increased by 201% on the day of Christine Blasey Ford's testimony against Brett Kavanaugh alone.
Of the more than 7,000 hate crime incidents in 2017, more than 4,000 were crimes against people, ranging from threats and intimidation to assault, to murder. More than 3,000 were crimes against property, ranging from vandalism to robbery to arson.
As I have said many, many times now: Donald Trump didn't invent hatred and bigotry, but he has certainly done every goddamn thing he can to more deeply entrench them and empower their vile purveyors.

Open Wide...

Discussion Thread: How Are You?

I am tired. I can't remember ever being this tired in my entire life. I'm tired in every part of my body, including my brain. It's like an exhaustion I just can't quench.

I'm relieved that the midterms were not the worst, and I'm scared that it still won't matter.

I am very grateful for friends who make me laugh.

I am also, as always, glad for this community, particularly in this moment. Anyone who wants to join me in another enormous virtual group hug is welcome.

How are you?

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Olivia the White Farm Cat curled up on the couch, sound asleep
Sleepy little dumpling. ♥

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 663

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Earlier today by me: Midterm Elections: The Latest and Trump to Ask Kirstjen Nielsen to Pretend to Resign.

Here are some more things in the news today...

[Content Note: Wildfires; death and displacement] Dani Anguiano and Gabrielle Canon at the Guardian: California Wildfires: Camp Fire Becomes State's Deadliest with 42 People Killed.
The Camp Fire in northern California has killed 42 people, making it the deadliest in state history, authorities said.

The blaze is also the most destructive the state has ever seen, incinerating the town of Paradise and displacing more than 50,000 people as other blazes continued to rage farther south.

A total of 7,177 buildings have been destroyed, Cal Fire said. The fire grew to 183 sq miles Monday, and containment was up to 30%.

Two people have also died in the Woolsey Fire, a major blaze around Los Angeles.

On Monday officials said the Woolsey Fire had burned 91,572 acres and was 20% contained. "We are working all day and all night to increase and reinforce that containment," said the Los Angeles county fire chief, Daryl Osby. The fire had destroyed 370 structures, with 57,000 still at risk, Osby said.
My god. Some suggestions on ways to help can be found here.

Meanwhile, the president is spending his time dumping embarrassing tweetshitz, as usual. Zack Ford at ThinkProgress: Trump Mocks France for Being Invaded by the Nazis. "Trump unleashed a new round of Twitter rage Tuesday morning, this time aimed at French President Emmanuel Macron, whom he visited in Paris over Veterans' Day weekend. In one tweet, the president appears to mock France for having been invaded by Nazi Germany some 80 years ago. 'Emmanuel Macron suggests building its own army to protect Europe against the U.S., China and Russia,' he wrote. 'But it was Germany in World Wars One & Two — How did that work out for France? They were starting to learn German in Paris before the U.S. came along. Pay for NATO or not!'" JFC.

* * *

In good resistance news...

Pete Williams at NBC News: State of Maryland Asks Judge to Declare Rosenstein Acting Attorney General. "The state of Maryland plans to ask a federal judge on Tuesday for an order declaring that Rod Rosenstein is the acting attorney general — not Matt Whitaker, who was appointed to that position last week after the forced resignation of Jeff Sessions. ...Maryland's attorney general, Brian Frosh, a Democrat, argues in court documents to be filed Tuesday that if Trump had the kind of authority the White House claims, he could fire the attorney general 'then appoint a carefully selected senior employee who he was confident would terminate or otherwise severely limit the investigation.' Maryland argues that Whitaker's selection by Trump violated federal law and exceeded the appointment authority in the Constitution." Right on!

As you may recall, Jeff Sessions found himself at the blunt end of Trump's ire ever since he recused himself from the Russia investigation. So Trump is sure to be thrilled about this! Nicole Lafond at TPM: Whitaker Talking with Ethics Officials About Possible Recusal from Mueller Probe. "Acting Attorney General Matt Whitaker is currently in conversation with ethics officials within the Justice Department about his possible recusal from oversight of special counsel Robert Mueller's Russia probe, DOJ officials said Monday night, according to Politico. ...Top Democrats have called on Whitaker to recuse himself from overseeing the probe, citing Whitaker's past comments disparaging Mueller and the investigation." That would be hilarious if it weren't signaling the end of the U.S. democracy.

And in other legal challenges to Trump's authoritarianism...


Good. I hope they prevail (she says, internally rage-thrashing about Trump's stacking the courts care of Mitch McConnell's unethical fuckery and grieving what a short window there is before no decent person will ever prevail in the courts against Republicans for at least a generation, if not forever).

* * *

[CN: Nativism; gun violence] Yeganeh Torbati at Reuters: Fewer Foreign Students Coming to United States for Second Year in Row. "The number of international students entering U.S. colleges and universities has fallen for the second year in a row, a nonprofit group said on Tuesday, amid efforts by the Trump administration to tighten restrictions on foreigners studying in the United States. ...Several factors are driving the decrease. Visa and immigration policy changes by the Trump administration have deterred some international students from enrolling, college administrators and immigration analysts said. ...[H]eadlines about mass shootings also may have deterred some students, said Allan Goodman, president of IIE. 'Everything matters from safety, to cost, to perhaps perceptions of visa policy,' Goodman said."

[CN: Nativism; video may autoplay at link] Elise Foley at the Huffington Post: Trump Asylum Ban Will Extend to Thousands of Unaccompanied Immigrant Minors. "A controversial Trump administration policy suspending asylum for immigrants who cross the border illegally will also apply to kids and teenagers traveling to the United States without their parents, contradicting last week's comment by a high-level Trump official that it 'does not apply' to unaccompanied minors. 'This suspension does not apply to any unaccompanied alien children as defined in the [Immigration and Nationality Act],' a senior administration official told reporters Friday on a briefing call, which was jointly hosted by the Department of Homeland Security and Department of Justice. (To participate in the briefing, reporters had to agree to quote the officials without using their names.) DHS issued a press release, titled 'DHS Myth vs. Fact,' on Friday that stated the rule 'does not limit the rights of unaccompanied alien minors.' But unaccompanied minors are, in fact, affected by the policy change."

Not only are the Trump Regime a bunch of fucking liars, but they consistently try to justify their nationalist agenda by claiming to be protecting us from violent criminals and terrorists. The next time you hear that line of stinking horseshit, think of this...

[CN: Terrorism] Carol Rosenberg at McClatchy: Trump Closed an Office That Tracked Ex-Gitmo Inmates; Now We Don't Know Where Some Went. "The Trump administration closed a diplomatic office designed to keep track of released Guantánamo inmates and make sure they didn't return to their insurgencies. And now the U.S. government has lost track of several of them, including one who has returned to a terrorist-held part of Syria, a McClatchy investigation has found. ...An aide at the House Foreign Affairs Committee, who was allowed to brief McClatchy on condition of anonymity, called Syria 'the worst place for an angry [former detainee] to turn up.'"

* * *

[CN: Police brutality; racism; death; gun violence] Mark Guarino, Alex Horton, and Michael Brice-Saddler at the Washington Post: 'They Basically Saw a Black Man with a Gun': Police Kill Armed Guard While Responding to Call.
It began in a way gun advocates have suggested would curtail violence. A gun comes out. Shots are fired. A "good guy with a gun" steps in to help before police can respond.

The tidy theoretical doesn't account for the chaotic unknowns when police arrive and can't tell a "good guy" with a gun from a "bad guy" with a gun.

The theory turned to grim reality at Manny's Blue Room Bar in Robbins, Ill., outside Chicago early Sunday.

Police shot and killed the good guy. Jemel Roberson, 26, was working security.

"Everybody was screaming out, 'He was a security guard,' and they basically saw a black man with a gun and killed him," witness Adam Harris told WGN.
The tidy theoretical doesn't account for the chaotic unknowns. Yeah. "Chaotic unknowns" like deadly racism.

[CN: Death] Julian E. Barnes, Eric Schmitt, and David D. Kirkpatrick at the New York Times: 'Tell Your Boss': Recording Is Seen to Link Saudi Crown Prince More Strongly to Khashoggi Killing. "Shortly after the journalist Jamal Khashoggi was assassinated last month, a member of the kill team instructed a superior over the phone to 'tell your boss,' believed to be Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia, that the operatives had carried out their mission... The recording, shared last month with the CIA director, Gina Haspel, is seen by intelligence officials as some of the strongest evidence linking Prince Mohammed to the killing of Mr. Khashoggi... While the prince was not mentioned by name, American intelligence officials believe 'your boss' was a reference to Prince Mohammed." Goddammit.

[CN: Misogyny] Lindsay Gibbs at ThinkProgress: Their College Told Them Running in Sports Bras Was 'Distracting' — Here's How They Fought Back.
A couple of weeks ago, members of the Women's Cross Country team at Rowan University were running grueling 5:30 mile repeats on the track, when the coach of the football team approached their coach and told them that they needed to cover up.

You see, some of the women on the team were practicing in sports bras, and apparently, that was distracting to the football players.

This did not sit well with the runners at all. On the ensuing Friday, there was a closed-door meeting at the Athletics Department to discuss the matter. The cross-country runners stood silently outside, as a way to show support for their coach, speaking on their behalf.

The Athletics Department's verdict just heaped further insult on the team.

Not only would the women not be allowed to practice solely in sports bras anymore, they were going to have to move their practices to the high-school track across the street so that their presence wouldn't upset the delicate balance of football practice, which takes place on the football field inside the track.

...Gina Capone, a junior who ran on the Cross Country team in 2017 and remains close with the current crop of runners, knew she had to do something. ...So last Thursday, after securing the permission of her former teammates — including sophomore Brianna De la Cruz and senior Hannah Vendetta — Capone penned a fiery article on The Odyssey, a self-publishing platform targeted at college students.

...In just four days, Capone's article has nearly 200,000 views, and the story has been covered everywhere from the New York Times to Sports Illustrated. It has been, in one word, 'overwhelming.'

It's also been effective, at least partially.
With everything else women have to deal with at this particular moment, I can't even fucking deal with the fact that women are having to deal with this retrofuck misogyny, too! FUCKING HELL. GET YOUR SHIT TOGETHER, MEN. JESUS JONES.

* * *

And finally, I will end by saying (not for the first time and probably not the last) that I ♥ Rep. Elijah Cummings.

Nicole Lafond at TPM: Cummings Asks Colleagues, Incoming Dems to Ignore Anti-Pelosi Factions. "Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD), a ranking member of the House Oversight Committee and an influential Democrat in the House, sent a letter to colleagues and the incoming class of House Democrats on Monday, urging them to keep House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) in leadership and ignore the faction of members whispering about her ouster. 'For two years, (a small group of House Democrats) asserted that with Nancy Pelosi as our leader, Democrats could never win back the House,' he wrote... 'They claimed that these relentless Republican attacks made Leader Pelosi appear too divisive and they argued that she should step aside for the good of the party. But then last Tuesday happened. And the American people obliterated the theory that Nancy Pelosi could not lead House Democrats to victory.'" YES!!!

Cummings is a man who knows how to effectively resist. Damn!

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...