I Cannot, James Comey


Anything having to do with James Comey fills me with such rage that the only thing I can do is try to pay as little attention to it as possible.

I just can't.

Honestly, I expend so much energy caring about and writing about and being sad and angry and grief-stricken about the consequences of his horrendo decision that I just don't have anything left over to deal with him.

Fuck that guy.

Open Wide...

What I'm Reading Now

A thread for sharing what we're currently reading: Fiction, nonfiction, novels, short stories, historical fiction, biographies, romance, fanfic, comic books, graphic novels, longform journalism, research papers, stuff for pleasure, stuff for work, whatever.

I recently finished Ijeoma Oluo's So You Want to Talk About Race. (Buy it at one of the listed vendors. Also be sure to request it at your local library!)

image of the cover of So You Want to Talk About Race, which is a simple, bold cover featuring the text of the title and the author's name

I definitely recommend this book. I could easily quote virtually any passage to entice you to read it, but this was a particular stand-out for me:
When we were slaves nursing their babies, we were not nice enough. When we were maids cleaning their homes, we were not nice enough. When we were porters shining their shoes, we were not nice enough. And when we danced and sang for their entertainment, we were not nice enough.

For hundreds of years we have been told that the path to freedom from racial oppression lies in our virtue, that our humanity must be earned. We simply don't deserve equality yet.

So when people say that they don't like my tone, or when they say they can't support the "militancy" of Black Lives Matter, or when they say that it would be easier if we just didn't walk about race all the time — I ask one question:

Do you believe in justice and equality?

Because if you believe in justice and equality you believe in it all of the time, for all people. You believe in it for newborn babies, you believe in it for single mothers, you believe in it for kids in the street, you believe in justice and equality for people you like and people you don't. You believe in it for people who don't say please.

And if there was anything I could say or do that would convince someone that I or people like me don't deserve justice or equality, then they never believed in justice and equality in the first place.

Yes, I am a Malcolm. And Martin, and Angela, Marcus, Rosa, Biko, Baldwin, Assata, Harriet, and Nina. I'm fighting for liberation. I'm filled with righteous anger and love. I'm shouting, as all before me have in their way. And I'm a human being who was born deserving justice and equality, and that is all you should need to know in order to stand by my side.
I take up space in solidarity with Ijeoma Oluo, because I believe in justice and equality all of the time, for all people.

What are you reading now?

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Zelda the Black and Tan Mutt sitting in the garden, looking to one side
The adorable Ms. Zelly Belly, Queen of the Garden.

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 511

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Earlier today by SKM: The Press Promotes an Election Narrative with Little Evidence, But Serves to Conceal Possible Meddling. And by me: Inside the Converted Walmart Where 1,500 Migrant Children Are Being Detained and Trump Heaps Praise on Kim: "We Understand Each Other".

Here are some more things in the news today...


More on the Inspector General's report from Chris Strohm at Bloomberg: Comey Broke from FBI Procedures in Clinton Probe, Watchdog Finds. "Former FBI Director James Comey 'deviated' from bureau and Justice Department procedures in handling the probe into Hillary Clinton, damaging the agencies' image of impartiality even though he wasn't motivated by politics, the department's watchdog found in a highly anticipated report. 'While we did not find that these decisions were the result of political bias on Comey's part, we nevertheless concluded that by departing so clearly and dramatically from FBI and department norms, the decisions negatively impacted the perception of the FBI and the department as fair administrators of justice,' Inspector General Michael Horowitz said in the report's conclusions, which were obtained by Bloomberg News."


* * *

This exchange between CNN anchor Erin Burnett and Republican Senator Jim Risch regarding Donald Trump saying he trusts Kim Jong Un is really something:

Burnett: Here's what the President of the United States is saying about Kim Jong Un!

[shows clip of Trump saying: "I do trust him, yeah. I think he trusts me, and I trust him." CNN's Jim Acosta asks: "And you do trust him?" Trump replies: "I do. You know, as I told you, in six months — the answer is: I do."]

Burnett: You don't have any concern about him being so adamant that he trusts a murderous dictator that he's met for five hours one time?!

Risch: Erin! You would have to be the most naive person on the face of the earth to think that the President of the United States is gonna walk in, meet with the guy for a bit, and walk out of there and say, "Well, I trust him—"

Burnett: Well, that's exactly what he did, Senator!!!

Risch: I'm telling you, he understands verification. We are gonna have verification or we're not gonna have a deal. [edit] I know you people are trying to put a rough spin on this, a negative spin on this, but this is an entirely different situation than what we had 120 days ago. Give him a break! At least give him some credit for saying that they're no longer testing—

Burnett: I would have to say, Senator, I don't think we're putting a rough spin. I think we're saying the President of the United States came out of a meeting and said "I trust a guy" with the record he has. That is exactly what happened. That's not spin. That's a fact. [crosstalk] So what I'm asking you is: Why are those facts the way they are? Is it okay that he did that?! Do you support that he did that?! Because I'm not putting a spin on it. I'm just playing for you what he did.

Risch: Yeah. Well, you will recall that in the past leaders have said, "Well, we're gonna trust, but we're gonna verify." And I can tell you, that is exactly where the President of the United States is today.
LOL except no he's not though.

In related news...

Kate Riga at TPM: Trump Salutes North Korean General, Breaks with American Precedent. "As circulated by North Korean state media, footage shows [Donald] Trump saluting a top North Korean military official, a stunning display of respect from the American President to a hostile and oppressive regime."


Barbara Starr, Pamela Brown, and Ryan Browne at CNN: Trump Administration Expected to Suspend August U.S.-South Korea Drill as Pentagon Scrambles.
The Trump administration is expected to announce the formal suspension of planning for major August multilateral military drills on the Korean Peninsula as soon as Thursday, according to several administration officials with knowledge of White House, State Department and Defense Department planning on how to carry out [Donald] Trump's decision announced at the Singapore summit.

Detailed Pentagon guidance is expected this week on carrying out Trump's decision to suspend so-called "war games" with South Korea. The Pentagon's post-Singapore involvement in this issue is raising questions about whether the President sought military advice ahead of making his decision.

As the dust settles from the historic summit, some details about how Trump got the idea to offer a suspension of military exercises to North Korean leader Kim Jong Un are becoming clearer.

A source familiar with the matter pushed back on the idea that Trump got the idea to halt joint exercises from Russian President Vladimir Putin. The source said that, if anything, it's something that came from Chinese President Xi Jinping, who has been very vocal about it and has had direct conversations with Trump about the matter. The term "war games" was also a term coined by China and North Korea.
Oh good. So Donald Trump is a puppet of two hostile regimes. Cool.

Speaking of which... Alberto Nardelli and Julia Ioffe at BuzzFeed: Trump Told World Leaders Crimea Is Russian Because Everyone There Speaks Russian. "Donald Trump told G7 leaders that Crimea is Russian because everyone who lives there speaks Russian, according to two diplomatic sources. Trump made the remarks over dinner last Friday during a discussion on foreign affairs at the G7 summit in Quebec, Canada, one of the diplomats told BuzzFeed News. ...During the dinner, Trump also seemed to question why the G7 leaders were siding with Ukraine. The president told leaders that 'Ukraine is one of the most corrupt countries in the world,' the source said." JFC. This is the U.S. President straight-up being a Kremlin mouthpiece. He was full-tilt spewing Russian propaganda at the G7.

* * *

David A. Fahrenthold at the Washington Post: New York Files Suit Against Donald Trump, Alleging His Charity Engaged in 'Illegal Conduct'. "The New York attorney general on Thursday filed suit against [Donald] Trump and his three eldest children alleging 'persistently illegal conduct' at the president's personal charity, saying Trump repeatedly misused the nonprofit — to pay off his businesses' creditors, to decorate one of his golf clubs, and to stage a multimillion dollar giveaway at his 2016 campaign events. In the suit, filed Thursday morning, attorney general Barbara Underwood asked a state judge to dissolve the Donald J. Trump Foundation. She asked that its remaining $1 million in assets be distributed to other charities and that Trump be forced to pay at least $2.8 million in restitution and penalties. Underwood also asks that Trump be banned from leading any other New York nonprofit for 10 years." Welp.


Well, Sarah, I'm guessing that CBS assumed you just would have lied, which is why they didn't bother asking you.

[Content Note: Nativism] Elham Khatami at ThinkProgress: Baltimore to Lose Dozens of Skilled Immigrant Teachers, Thanks to Trump's Crackdown on H-1B Visas. "Nearly 25 Baltimore public school teachers will see their visas expire at the end of June, when they will be forced to return to the Philippines and Jamaica, where they're from, compounding Baltimore's already severe teacher shortage. According to the Baltimore Sun, the teachers came to the United States in the mid-2000s on H-1B visas, which allow employers to hire skilled foreign workers in a range of fields like technology, research, and education. Baltimore City Public Schools hired the teachers to fill positions in the math, science, and special education fields."

[CN: Harassment; threats; doxxing] Jason Wilson at the Guardian: Doxxing, Assault, Death Threats: The New Dangers Facing U.S. Journalists Covering Extremism. "As Kenoyer's experience suggests, the vitriol and threats from the far right are disproportionately targeted at women, and anyone else whose identity departs from the alt-right's ideal type — white men. Ellerbeck, the CPJ coordinator, says that gender identity, ethnicity, and sexual orientation are all factors that affect a reporter's 'risk profile' for attacks." Yes. Also: This is not a "new danger." It's an old danger that journalists and advocate writers have been facing for decades from multiple right-wing factions, especially radical extremist anti-choicers.

* * *

[CN: Corruption; human rights abuses] Lindsay Gibbs at ThinkProgress: Your Complete Guide to Corruption at the 2018 Men's World Cup in Russia. "FIFA awarded Russia the 2018 World Cup back in 2010. Since then, Russia has interfered with foreign elections, propped up a murderous regime in Syria, invaded Ukraine, gotten kicked out of the G8 for invading Ukraine, poisoned its enemies, and been sanctioned for facilitating the one of the biggest state-sponsored doping scandals in the history of sports at the 2014 Sochi Olympics. And yet, here we are. ...[A]ccording to Human Rights Watch, we are currently in the middle of the 'worst human rights crisis in Russia since the Soviet era.' And FIFA has done next to nothing about it."

Nico Hines and Adam Rawnsley at the Daily Beast: Sanctioned Russians Are Making a Killing from the World Cup. "The World Cup — with its international TV audience of billions — is being hosted in Russia for the first time, and bringing with it a multimillion-dollar orgy of sponsorship, tourism, global advertising, and massive construction projects. Despite their supposed exile from the global economy, companies and oligarchs targeted by the U.S. Treasury were among those securing some of the best contracts linked to the showpiece finals. ...The Daily Beast asked six of the World Cup sponsors, including Coca-Cola and Visa, about the tournament's links to sanctioned entities, but none of them chose to reply. ...It seems a tougher sanctions regime could have forced global brands and bodies like FIFA to think twice about effectively endorsing the Kremlin and its backers. We now know, if it's purely a question of moral judgment, it's a challenge too far."

[CN: Homophobic violence] Josh Jackman at Pink News: Gay World Cup Fan Left with Brain Injuries After Brutal Attack. "There have long been fears of violence against LGBT people travelling to the country for the tournament — which starts on June 14 — with the Government directing fans to advice telling them to hide their sexuality in public. LGBT activist group Pride in Football also revealed that it had been sent death threats saying that any gay fans going to the World Cup would be hunted down and stabbed. And it appears that these fears have been realised, with reports indicating that a gay couple — who had travelled to Russia to cheer on France — have been beaten in St Petersburg."

Fuck FIFA. These men's blood is on their hands, too.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

Trump Heaps Praise on Kim: "We Understand Each Other"

During an interview with Fox News' Bret Baier, Donald Trump waxed romantic about his new bestie, North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un. When Baier noted that Kim is "clearly executing people," Trump responded with just an extraordinary litany of praise.

Baier: He's clearly executing people!

Trump: He's a tough guy. Hey, when you take over a country, tough country, tough people, and you take it over from your father, I don't care who you are, what you are, how much of an advantage you have, if you can do that at 27 years old, I mean, that's 1 in 10,000 that could do that. So he's a very smart guy. He's a great negotiator. But I think we understand each other.
Like every day, there is a lot of important news today. This quote will not, for example, get as much attention as the Inspector General's report on James Comey's handling of the investigation into Hillary Clinton's emails — which is certainly important, but let me note that the lasting impact, if any, of the IG report may be entirely contingent on how much Donald Trump is inclined to behave like a dictator and is empowered by his indecent party to behave like one.

So here he is, responding to a reporter exclaiming with some alarm that the dictator he is praising is a vile executioner, not condemning that dictator and his wanton atrocities, but effusively praising him.

That this is who Donald Trump is, that this is what he believes, is the most important news item of the day — specifically because there are people who don't believe or understand that this is who he is and what he believes, specifically because there are people, in his party and in the press, who actively work to conceal that this is who he is and what he believes.

Anyone who has paid attention to Trump, who has scrutinized his words and actions instead of treating him a clown, has known from Day One that this is who Trump really is. But the populace were widely encouraged to not take him seriously, to treat him like entertainment, to view him as stupid and unstrategic and ineffective, and to this very day are being served mendacious narratives about his supposed foolishness, as though he seized control of the world's preeminent superpower by accident.

This is the news. This cannot and should not and must not be dismissed out of hand with another that's just Trump being Trump! This is the sitting president of the United States of America talking about how tough and smart a murderous dictator is. Saying, "We understand each other."

I can contemplate nothing that more pointedly exposes how truly unmoored we have become than the fact that Trump saying he understands Kim in reply to the invocation of his penchant for execution isn't the headline today.

Open Wide...

The Press Promotes an Election Narrative with Little Evidence, But Serves to Conceal Possible Meddling

Screenshot from June 13 Morning Joe Sanford Loses Reelection Bid After Trump Hits Him in Tweet

Early yesterday morning, I turned on MSNBC to this chyron on Morning Joe: "Sanford Loses Re-Election Bid After Trump Hits Him in Tweet." Here is the tweet in question:


We are meant to believe that Trump swooped in nine hours after the polls opened, dropped a single critical tweet, and Sanford's challenger then won by a healthy 4-point margin. South Carolina mainstream media were certainly quick to promote that narrative. The Charleston Post and Courier framed Arrington's win as a "a monumental upset fueled by a Donald Trump tweet" and further opined that Sanford's defeat "carries national implications."

NBC News, CBS News, and CNN all framed Arrington's victory this way too. CNN claimed, "Support Trump and you have a better-than-average chance of winning in a Republican primary. Oppose him — even occasionally — and run the risk of losing for your apostasy."

Based on Arrington's win and that of white supremacist Virginia senate candidate Corey Stewart, the Washington Post declared, "Trump is the big winner in Tuesday's primaries," and added the strange observation that "It's overly simplistic to say that South Carolina GOP congressman Mark Sanford lost his primary Tuesday because of Trump. But Trump was definitely a factor in making Sanford the second House Republican in 2018 to lose a primary." So it's overly simplistic to credit Trump with Arrington's win, but they're going to do it anyway.

The Washington Post doubled down on this narrative two hours later in The Daily 202: "Mark Sanford's primary loss shows the peril of crossing Trump."

This unified theory of Arrington's win ignores other possible explanations, such as the strong performance of female candidates over the past year, and the trend favoring outsiders and newcomers.

Notice that Donald Trump himself was quick to adopt mainstream media framing. He took credit for Arrington's win, even claiming he bucked his advisors to seal the deal:


But I agree with Dan Lavoie, who tweeted of the Charleston Post and Courier article that it's "Pretty weird — and frankly irresponsible — to run a banner headline asserting facts not in evidence. Trump tweeted three hours before polls closed. Arrington won by 4 full points. It's virtually impossible Trump moved that many voters that late in the day."

This last-minute swoop followed by an upset reminds me of the time Paul Manafort encouraged Trump to go to Michigan on October 31st 2016, right before the presidential election. According to the conservative Weekly Standard, Trump then won Michigan by 0.2%, or roughly 10,700 votes (and he won Wisconsin and Pennsylvania by slim identical margins of 0.7% each).

There has been no audit of the 2016 vote in any state. We do not know if there was tampering with voter rolls, ballot counting, or vote totals. Meanwhile, California-based cybersecurity firm FireEye reports that "it is possible that [hackers] had the ability to modify or delete data" in 2016 and that "U.S. election systems are increasingly at risk for cyberattacks."

Furthermore, The State reported last month [H/T to Shaker Aphra_Behn] that "South Carolina will need a lot more money to secure its elections," adding:
"Securing voter data has been a major focus since the 2016 election, when South Carolina recorded 150,000 attempts to hack into its voter-registration system on Election Day alone. Those were among several attempts to penetrate voting systems reported ahead of the last national election."
So there is evidence that our election systems are not adequately secured.

Additionally, there is remarkably little evidence that Trump has suddenly become so popular that even mild criticism of him is a sure career-ender. He is roughly as popular with the Republican base as he was fifteen months ago, when Republican constituents were lecturing Chuck Grassley about death panels and getting up in Dave Brat's grill wherever he went. Quinnipiac had Trump at 91% approval with GOP voters back then (March 2017) and 82% now (May 10, 2018).

Furthermore, the Washington Post reports that "People who say they're most eager to vote strongly disapprove of Trump." And while Corey Stewart won in Virginia last night, Trump's endorsement didn't pull Ed Gillespie over the line in the governor's race last December, even with the interference of race-baiting bots.

Given Trump's relatively flat approval numbers and the vulnerabilities of our elections systems, we must recognize the possibility that local elections may be fudged and then Trump's intervention invoked as a last-minute game-changer to conceal said fudging.

This possibility is alarming for a host of reasons, not least of which is the Department of Homeland Security's conclusion that "convincing voters that their ballots are secure" is their top ongoing challenge. Why bother to vote if you don't trust that your vote will count?

The Morning Joe segment which opened this post provides one explanation of the puzzling narrative that Trump is too popular to criticize. Joe Scarborough says that "The primary voters in the Republican party have devolved into a Trumpist cult." But on his June 12th show, before any SC primary votes were cast, Scarborough was already setting up this narrative. He told the following anecdote about an unnamed GOP congressman (Morning Joe does not provide transcripts, but the relevant part is at 1:13:27 of the podcast):
I was talking to a Republican that I've known since I first came to Congress in 1994 and he said it was surreal, going around his district having people angry at him for talking about free trade, for talking about the need to balance budgets…and getting on him for suggesting that the president not lie about payoffs to porn stars. He said it is surreal: "People are coming up to me angry in my district because I'm saying the exact same things I've been saying for 25 years."
Scarborough blames primary voters, but his information comes from one old friend in the House, not voters at town halls nationwide.

And on Monday's Morning Joe, Heidi Pryzbyla talked to voters in Michigan who were primarily concerned with health care (1:09:05). An alternative thesis might be that Republican members of congress are afraid of the usual midterm losses for the party in power (or worse). So they preemptively blame their own constituents. I'm sure there are credible stories of cultish constituents, but cable and print news selectively amplify them in unison.

The press is powerful, and right now they run the risk of handing Trump perfect cover for ongoing election interference.

Open Wide...

Inside the Converted Walmart Where 1,500 Migrant Children Are Being Detained

[Content Note: Child abuse; nativism; carcerality.]

Last night, MSNBC's Jacob Soboroff was one of the first reporters allowed to tour Casa Padre, the converted Walmart in Brownsville, Texas, where more than a thousand migrant children are being detained. Smile at the children, he was told, because "they feel like animals in a cage being looked at."

The children are not kept in cages (at least not in this facility); instead they sleep in makeshift rooms, five beds to a room: "The bedrooms at Casa Padre are doorless, with walls reaching only halfway to a 20-foot-high industrial ceiling that serves as a constant reminder of the building's past. It used to be four beds to a room. But as the shelter fills to capacity, a fifth bed — a cot — has been added to each."

Soboroff reported what he saw during an interview with Lawrence O'Donnell last night. The complete transcript, when available, will be here. Below, I have transcribed key passages of Soboroff's commentary.

We were not allowed to bring our cameras inside, and that is because there are almost 1,500 boys between the ages of 10 and 17 years old, that are going to sleep in there tonight; at 9:00, the lights go out. And it's essentially a prison, or a jail, without cages or cells for these young boys, the majority of them who arrived in America as unaccompanied minors — they crossed on their own — but an increasing number, as you know and have been reporting on, are being separated from their parents, because of the zero tolerance policy from the Trump administration. And it's, ah, it's truly an unbelievable thing to see. I mean, it's almost hard to wrap your head around, but you go inside, and there are hundreds of kids at a time, in line for chow, doing activities, but they're all there because they were picked up by the Border Patrol and locked up. And they're not gonna be able to get out of there for the next couple months; at least, that's the average stay.

...There's a lot of American history all over this place, and the kids go to school for six hours a day, and they want to teach these kids about America, but there's a mural of — you know, of anybody that they could have possibly picked — Donald Trump, right in that cafeteria. So, first thing you see when you go in there, and essentially what it says is: "You don't always win the battle, but you can win the war." [Image of the mural is shown onscreen; the quote attributed to Trump reads: "Sometimes by losing a battle you find a new way to win the war."] It's just a striking thing to think about — that an increasing number of these kids are being ripped apart from their parents and being brought into a facility like this, sleeping in a former Walmart, because of a Donald Trump policy, and there's Donald Trump, up on the wall, for them to see, every single day.

...I want to emphasize: This is a licensed facility with, you know, child service professionals, and I think that they're doing, for all intents and purposes, a relatively good job taking care of these kids. There's a large medical staff on duty at all times, 48 people and 3 doctors on call; there's teachers; it is 1 to 8, in terms of staff to detained children. But the big thing...that was flagged to me by the operators of this facility — which, again, was opened before this migrant policy change by the Trump administration, of zero tolerance — is that now it's going to be overflowing, because kids are being ripped away from their parents and they're being put into centers like this.

They gotta open these "tent cities," and the administration is looking at federal property, like military bases or ports of entry. What they told me inside here today is that those facilities don't have to be licensed; they don't have to have practitioners that are professionals in their field, because essentially those are emergency setups. And it wasn't something I had heard before — and I would imagine could have, you know, very big consequences, when you've got hundreds if not thousands of undocumented children, you know, as young as infants, not being taken care of necessarily by professionals.
All of this is very alarming. What Soboroff is describing sounds like it's verging uncomfortably close to a reeducation camp, where incarcerated children are indoctrinated with U.S. propaganda under a watchful mural of the president who created the "emergency" that will justify the creation of concentration camps that lack even the illusion of care.

(Which is not to unilaterally disparage the professionals who work at Casa Padre. I'm certain some of them genuinely care for these children very much. But it's the provision of care inside a detention center, and any of them who truly care for these kids surely would prefer they weren't there at all.)

This is absolutely intolerable. And that this obscenity is happening inside a former Walmart really emphasizes what a uniquely U.S. American horror it is.

We must resist this with everything we've got. Make some noise. Be of service. Contact your Senators and Reps. Write letters to the editor of your local paper. Raise awareness on social media. Talk to anyone who will listen.

Related Reading:

[CN: Video may autoplay at link] Ed Lavandera, Jason Morris, and Darran Simon at CNN: She Says Federal Officials Took Her Daughter While She Breastfed the Child in a Detention Center.

Nick Miroff at the Washington Post: Scanning Immigrants' Old Fingerprints, U.S. Threatens to Strip Thousands of Citizenship.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of a yellow couch

Hosted by a yellow sofa. Have a seat and chat.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Suggested by Shaker Yankee Transferred: "What's a weird sentence that you remember (from your life, or a movie, or a book) for no apparent reason? Who spoke it?"

Sailor Ripley (Nicolas Cage) in Wild at Heart, who wears a beloved snakeskin jacket: "Did I ever tell ya that this here jacket represents a symbol of my individuality and my belief in personal freedom?"

I don't know why it's stuck so hard in my head, nor why I feel obliged to say it probably at least one out of every five times I'm putting on a jacket, which prompts Iain to roll his eyes elaborately and longsufferingly, lol.

In the film, Lula Fortune (Laura Dern) replies, "About fifty thousand times," and I strongly feel that if Iain just embraced it and used her response, he'd feel better about the whole thing, but he doesn't appear to agree. He's sticking with the eyeroll. Hahaha! Fair.

Open Wide...

Wednesday Links!

This list o' links brought to you by jerky.

Recommended Reading:

Joanne Zuhl at Street Roots News: Political Journalist Sarah Kendzior on What Middle America Can Teach the Rest of the Country

Robin Marty at Dame: [Content Note: War on agency] The Supreme Court's Silence on Abortion Is Deadly

Andy Towle at Towleroad: A Grandmother Is Going Viral on Twitter Because of a 'Simple Gesture' of Love for Her Bisexual Granddaughter

Kia Morgan-Smith at the Grio: [CN: Transphobia; misogynoir] Transgender Track Athletes Speak out About Backlash over High School Victory [Note: If you're having trouble with this one, this thread should help.]

Melanie Ehrenkranz at Gizmodo: Silicon Valley Investor's Weirdo Dream of Three Californias Just Got One Step Closer to Reality

Megan Purdy at Comic Book Resources: Ant-Man and the Wasp Delivers a Sweaty Marvel Heroine, at Last

Kristy Puchko at Pajiba: [CN: Wonder Woman sequel character spoiler] Patty Jenkins Just Blew Our Minds with a Shocking and Sexy Wonder Woman 2 Reveal

Leave your links and recommendations in comments. Self-promotion welcome and encouraged!

Open Wide...

Shaker Gourmet

Whatcha been cooking up in your kitchen lately, Shakers?

Share your favorite recipes, solicit good recipes, share recipes you've recently tried, want to try, are trying to perfect, whatever! Whether they're your own creation, or something you found elsewhere, share away.

Also welcome: Recipes you've seen recently that you'd love to try, but haven't yet!

* * *

Popovers!

Open Wide...

Democrats Sit in at Border Patrol Offices

"What are the Democrats even doing?" THIS. This is what they are doing:


And next week, Democratic House Leader Nancy Pelosi will lead a Democratic delegation to the border, to witness the effects on human beings of Trump's vile immigration policies firsthand:


I hope this is only the beginning. I hope every single Democrat in the House and the Senate inserts themselves in front of every camera and/or microphone they can find between now and Donald Trump's final day in office to raise hell about his obscene nativist agenda.

And if the media turns off their cameras and microphones, then they should pick up megaphones and just start screaming.

This is what it's going to take. The time is now.

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Olivia the White Farm Cat sitting on top of me, looking content as I scratch her head
This girl right here. ♥

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 510

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Earlier today by me: Department of Health and Human Services Considering Building a Tent City to Hold Thousands of Children and The Press Is Powerful; They Shouldn't Pretend Otherwise and Poor, Sad Michael Cohen: The Cheese Stands Alone.

Here are some more things in the news today...

Colum Lynch and Robbie Gramer at Foreign Policy: Trump Appointee Compiles Loyalty List of U.S. Employees at U.N., State.
A senior advisor to the State Department appointed just two months ago has been quietly vetting career diplomats and American employees of international institutions to determine whether they are loyal to [Donald] Trump and his political agenda, according to nearly a dozen current and former U.S. officials.

Mari Stull, a former food and beverage lobbyist-turned-wine blogger under the name "Vino Vixen," has reviewed the social media pages of State Department staffers for signs of ideological deviation. She has researched the names of government officials to determine whether they signed off on Obama-era policies — though signing off does not mean officials personally endorsed them but merely cleared them through the bureaucratic chain. And she has inquired about Americans employed by international agencies, including the World Health Organization and the United Nations, asking their colleagues when they were hired and by whom, according the officials.

"She is actively making lists and gathering intel," said one of the sources, a senior diplomat. Stull was named in April as a senior advisor to the State Department's Bureau of International Organization Affairs, which manages U.S. diplomatic relations with the United Nations and other international institutions.

Her probing, along with a highly secretive management style, has become so uncomfortable that at least three senior officials are poised to leave the bureau, according to the sources. Officials there have warned some Americans employed by the U.N. to sidestep traditional meet-and-greet sessions with the department's upper management to avoid drawing attention to themselves.

"She is gunning for American citizens in the U.N. to see if they are toeing the line," the diplomatic source added.
This is absolutely chilling. Loyalty lists. Signs of ideological deviation. Gunning for citizens who don't toe the line. This is straight from the Soviets' playbook. Fucking hell.

* * *

As you may recall, I have been lamenting Special Counsel Bob Mueller's lack of urgency for some time, with my primary concern being that the longer he takes, the longer he gives the Republicans to consolidate power behind Donald Trump (and Mike Pence).

A secondary concern has been that all of this time gives Trump and his minions time to seize the dominant media narrative on Mueller as part of their campaign to discredit him.

Welp.

Darren Samuelsohn at Politico: Poll Shows Mueller's Public Image at All-Time Low. "Special counsel Robert Mueller's public image has sunk to an all-time low since he began his probe into possible collusion between the Trump 2016 presidential campaign and Russia, according to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll. Months of sustained conservative attacks led by [Donald] Trump and his allies has harmed Mueller most among Republicans, with a record 53 percent now saying they view the lead Russia investigator in an unfavorable light. That's a 26-point spike since July, when the poll first started asking voters whether they viewed Mueller favorably or unfavorably."

It shouldn't matter what the public thinks of Mueller, but the fact that his approval ratings have precipitously dropped among their base is yet another excuse for Congressional Republicans not to respect his findings. And they hardly needed another excuse.

* * *

This fucking guy:


The WaPo's Philip Rucker stated the obvious on Twitter in response to that mess: "Trump says 'there is no longer a nuclear threat from North Korea' — but North Korea still has nuclear weapons and Kim Jong Un is still supreme leader." Yeah. That about sums it up.

In other summit news, the National Security Council has claimed responsibility for that ridiculous fake movie trailer that Trump showed to Kim, depicting them both as heroes. So John Bolton and his crew were behind that wreck. Good grief.

* * *

[Content Note: Nativism; white supremacy] Elizabeth Chou and Brenda Gazzar at the San Jose Mercury News: California Woman 'in Shock' After ICE Agents Detain Father, a Legal Resident, Outside Home.
Jose Luis Garcia, 62, was watering his lawn and having his morning coffee outside his Arleta home when ICE agents put him in handcuffs and detained him, according to his daughter, Natalie Garcia.

The arrest came as a shock to the 32-year-old Garcia, who said that her father is a law-abiding, legal permanent resident who came to the United States nearly 50 years ago when he was 13-years-old.

...Garcia said she was woken up at about 7 a.m. Sunday by the sound of her father yelling her name. She initially thought he was experiencing a medical emergency, but when she came out of the house, she saw eight agents who she did not yet know were from ICE, arresting her father.

Garcia tried to get more information and asked to see the arrest warrant and if they had read him his rights. She said the agents responded rudely, did not answer most of her questions, and told her they did not have to show her the warrant. They told her that it was not a criminal warrant, but an administrative one.

"I didn't know they were ICE at that moment," Garcia said. "It just happened so fast and there were so many of them. I was so confused."

After the agents had left with her father, it was only then that she saw the coffee cup that he had dropped when he was being arrested. She then looked down at the card the agents had given her and finally realized the agents were from ICE.

"I dropped to the floor in shock, because I didn't ever expect this," Garcia said.
Of course not. Jose Garcia's conviction was 18 years earlier. It was a misdemeanor conviction stemming from "a domestic violence dispute," for which he completed his sentence, including attending anger management classes.

Domestic violence is a serious issue. That's why I have been a vocal advocate against domestic violence for many years. Note, however, that ICE appears to be claiming that it's so serious Garcia must be removed from his home 18 years after a conviction, while Attorney General Jeff Sessions is simultaneously arguing it's so not serious that it's no longer grounds for asylum.

Those are fundamentally irreconcilable positions.

Further, a speeding ticket is a misdemeanor conviction. If this government will use misdemeanor convictions to deport legal residents, and also plans to eventually use misdemeanor convictions to justify revoking people's citizenships through their heinous new office, any legal resident or naturalized citizen who's ever gotten a speeding ticket is fucked.

Meanwhile, in Texas... Houston Chronicle/AP: Rights Group: Texas Racial Profiling by Sharing with ICE. "Civil rights advocates say Texas law enforcement officers providing immigration authorities with details of motorists who have been cited and are suspected of being in the country illegally could amount to racial profiling. The San Antonio Express-News reports the Department of Public Safety has shared the names of hundreds of people with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement over the past two years."

Like I said, speeding tickets are misdemeanor convictions. And police have been using municipal violations to justify killing Black people for years. This is a known strategy of oppression against one marginalized community, and it's now being leveraged against another.

* * *

[CN: White supremacy]


[CN: Class warfare] Ryan Koronowski at ThinkProgress: Workers' Wages Fall After Passage of GOP Tax Cuts. "When [Donald] Trump was pushing Congress to pass his tax plan last year, which focused on lowering corporate rates and the income taxes of high earners, he pulled out a handy statistic: According to the president's Council of Economic Advisers, the average family would make $4,000 more under the new plan. Trump repeatedly used this figure to argue for the bill prior to its passage in December 2017, as well as directly after. ...Vice President Mike Pence has repeated that talking point, as have others in the White House. On Tuesday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics issued a new release detailing the 'real earnings summary' through May 2018. The true revelation was tucked away at the bottom of the release, in the 'Production and nonsupervisory employees' section: 'From May 2017 to May 2018, real average hourly earnings decreased 0.1 percent, seasonally adjusted,' it read."

[CN: Class warfare; healthcare access] Alice Ollstein at TPM: The Domino Effect of the Trump Admin Gutting Pre-Existing Conditions Protections. "The Trump administration’s new attempt to have key pieces of the Affordable Care Act struck down in federal court — particularly the ban on insurance companies turning people away or charging them higher premiums based on a pre-existing condition — could have a serious and damaging domino effect throughout the health care sector. Insurance trade groups, health care experts and lawmakers say the fallout is likely to extend beyond the individual market, impacting many of the tens of millions of Americans who get their health insurance from an employer." No one is safe from these radicals.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

Poor, Sad Michael Cohen: The Cheese Stands Alone


Can we get a 21 sad trombone salute for this poor, sad man who might actually have to face consequences for being one of the most corrupt traitors in the entire nation?

Emphasis, of course, on might.

Naturally, the narrative is that Team Trump is "running scared" at the prospect of Cohen cooperating with federal prosecutors, which might in turn lead to his cooperating with Special Counsel Bob Mueller. But I don't imagine that Trump and his sycophants are fearful so much as they are further contemplating various unethical and possibly illegal ways of shutting down Cohen, federal prosecutors, and Bob Mueller.

I really want to be wrong. I really want Cohen to cooperate, justice to prevail, and Trump to get thrown out on his ear along with his entire administration of treasonous goons, including Mike Pence. I really want all of this to matter.

I'm just not hopeful that it will.

At least not before we have reached a point of no return in the erosion of our democracy and the rule of law. Frankly, I'm not entirely sure we haven't passed that point already.

Open Wide...

The Press Is Powerful; They Shouldn't Pretend Otherwise

Once of the things about which I used to write when George W. Bush was president was his execrable habit of talking about policy like he had no power to influence it; like he wasn't the president.

He was arguably the most powerful person on the planet, and yet he would talk about war and broken levees and healthcare as though they were forces of nature and he was just as powerless as the rest of us to end a war or increase infrastructure spending or broaden access to healthcare.

It wasn't false humility — or, as so much of Bush's wickedness was wrongly attributed to, stupidity. It was a way of rhetorically distancing himself from accountability. To separate himself from the consequences of decisions for which he was responsible, whether via action or inaction.

It was a sly way of implying, over and over, that the presidency itself is less powerful than it is, to deflect both blame and deserved accountability.

This is a terrible habit that members of the press have picked up. They speak about Donald Trump and his presidency, and the narratives about both, as though those narratives emerged fully formed on the pages of newspapers, from another dimension perhaps.

Yesterday, I saw a perfect, terrible example of precisely what I mean. CNN's Ryan Struyk tweeted: "Trump says he got North Korea to commit to destroying a major missile testing site but 'we didn't put it in the agreement because we didn't have time.'" Which CNN commentator Ryan Lizza referenced as he tweeted: "A comment like this from Obama would have defined him on the right for his entire presidency and would have been endlessly repeated as evidence of his naïveté and stupidity. For Trump it's just Monday."

"The right" doesn't come by its narratives in a vacuum. The reason that narrative would have taken hold is because the press — the mainstream press, not just right-wing media — would have endlessly repeated Obama's mistake and are currently treating that comment like it's just Monday for Trump.


Trump has been waging war on the free press since virtually the moment he launched his presidential campaign, and yet large portions of the press — with, of course, notable exceptions who are working diligently to try to hold Trump meaningfully accountable — respond by capitulating to his bullying and becoming his stenographers (with fewer ethics than actual stenographers).

There are a lot of reasons for this, including habitual capitulation to Republican presidents. For example: Check out [Content Note: Disablist language] this piece I wrote in 2006 about media coverage of George W. Bush, and note that I could write virtually the same piece today about coverage of Trump.

But the primary reason is the same reason that Bush had the same deplorable habit: They want to avoid accountability.

Their role in delivering this nightmare president to the White House cannot be understated, even though it was hardly the only reason. They shaped the way the public viewed Trump as a joke; the way the public viewed him as a harmless bit of entertainment; the way the public viewed those of us who were urgently warning from go that he must be taken seriously as an authoritarian threat.

And now they shape the way the public views his authoritarianism as increasingly "normal."

Just another Monday.

The press has power. They shouldn't pretend that they don't. Especially not to avoid the responsibility of profound misuses and abuses of that power, to abet the dismantling of the very democracy they are meant to defend.

Open Wide...

Department of Health and Human Services Considering Building a Tent City to Hold Thousands of Children

[Content Note: Nativism; child abuse.]

A month ago, we learned that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has sent an email to Pentagon staffers, notifying them that the HHS would be making site visits to four military sites in Texas and Arkansas "to evaluate their suitability to shelter children."

It was a week after Attorney General Jeff Sessions had publicly threatened to forcibly separate undocumented families, to detain children separate from their parents, and to designate them "unaccompanied minors," even if they are actually not, as part of the Trump administration's new "zero tolerance" policy at the southern border.

The administration realized that policy would precipitously increase the number of children in HHS custody, and so it did: By the end of May, the number of "unaccompanied minors" in HHS custody surged by 21%, leaving HHS shelters at 95% capacity.

So earlier this month, we again heard that HHS was contemplating housing children they were forcibly separating from their parents at military sites.

Now Franco Ordoñez reports at McClatchy, Trump's Department of Health and Human Services is "looking to build tent cities at military posts around Texas to shelter the increasing number of unaccompanied migrant children being held in detention."

The Department of Health and Human Services will visit Fort Bliss, a sprawling Army base near El Paso in the coming weeks to look at a parcel of land where the administration is considering building a tent city to hold between 1,000 and 5,000 children, according to U.S. officials and other sources familiar with the plans.

...The Office of Refugee Resettlement at HHS is responsible for the care of more than 11,200 migrant children being held without a parent or guardian and must routinely evaluate the needs and capacity of approximately 100 shelters, which are now 95 percent full.

...Advocates accused the Trump administration of using the children as pawns to score political points.

"Detaining children for immigration purposes is never in their best interest and the prospect of detaining kids in tent cities is horrifying," said Clara Long, U.S. researcher at Human Rights Watch. "US authorities should focus on keeping families together, ensuring due process in asylum adjudications, and protecting the rights of children."
Instead, Trump has tasked Sessions and Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen with executing a policy that tears families apart, denies due process, and abuses children.

It is appallingly indecent that the United States government would even consider housing children in "tent cities" in the heat of the El Paso summer, which averages 95 degrees in July. Children are "more susceptible to heat illness than adults for many reasons, including a greater surface area to body mass ratio, lower rate of sweating, and slower rate of acclimatization. The prevention of heat illness is based on recognizing and modifying risk factors," like, presumably, not housing children in concentration camps in the El Paso heat.

Or anywhere else.

Trump's BFF Joe Arpaio, whom he pardoned last year, was the sheriff who ran a "tent city" — which he himself called a concentration camp — to house inmates in the Arizona desert for more than two decades. Here is how one former detainee in Arpaio's concentration camp describes the inhumane conditions:
During the sweltering summer, the temperature could reach 115 or 120 degrees. I was in the tents when we hit 120. It was impossible to stay cool in the oppressive heat. Everyone would strip down to their underwear. There was no cold water, only water from vending machines; and eventually, the machines would run out. People would faint; some had heatstroke. That summer, ambulances came about three times. One man died in his bed.

But the winter was even worse. During the winter, there were no heaters. Most jackets and heavily insulated pants weren't allowed; they don't want you to be comfortable.

When the temperatures dropped, we were forced to come up with makeshift ways to keep ourselves warm. The showers were kept scalding hot during both summer and winter. We hated to shower, but we would fill our empty water bottles up with the nearly boiling water and put the bottles between our blankets when it was freezing outside. We also would save the plastic bags we found when we cleaned up the jail yard and wrap our feet with them, tucking hot water bottles inside to keep our feet warm while we slept.

Still, it was freezing, achingly cold. I was in so much pain that winter that now, when I'm cold, it reminds me of being there.
These are the conditions to which the Trump administration wants to subject children that they have torn away from their parents to make a political point to shame asylum-seeking people who have committed no crime.

And what does the Republican Party, the party of moral values cough, have to offer these children in response to their imminent torture?

Silence.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of a red couch

Hosted by a red sofa. Have a seat and chat.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Suggested by Shaker catvoncat: "What is on your night table?"

Lamp, alarm clock, TV remote, a carafe for water, and usually at least one hair tie or clip, which I forgot to remove and leave in the bathroom.

Open Wide...

image of thumbs up & thumbs down Shaker Thumbs

Shaker Thumbs is your opportunity to give a thumbs-up or thumbs-down to a product or service you have used and that you'd recommend to other Shakers or warn them away from.

Today, I'm going to give a big ol' thumbs-up to BritBox!

screencap of the front page of BritBox's website

BritBox is a streaming collection of BBC & ITV shows, which you access via a monthly subscription of $6.99. We picked it up (through Amazon Prime streaming) a few months ago, and I've really enjoyed it.

I've become reacquainted with some old favorites, and I binged all three seasons of The Job Lot, which I adored. I've definitely gotten $7 a month worth of entertainment!

So, if you're a fan of British telly, especially if you're trying to cut the cable cord, you might want to check out BritBox. It doesn't have everything, but it has a lot. LOL.

Anyway! Give us your thumbs-up or thumbs-down in comments!

[Just to be abundantly clear, I am not affiliated in any way with companies or products recommended in this series, nor am I receiving any form of payment from them. Anything I share here is just because I like it!]

Open Wide...