White House "Fact Sheet" on Trump's First 500 Days Is Astounding

The White House has issued a "Fact Sheet" detailing all the successes [sic] of Donald Trump's first 500 days in office, and we all need to be completely blunt about what it is.

It's rank authoritarian propaganda published on the White House website.

First, we have to deal with how it starts:

screen cap of top of document, with text reading: 'FACT SHEETS | President Donald J. Trump's 500 Days of American Greatness | Issued on: June 4, 2018 | 'Our families will thrive. Our people will prosper. And our nation will forever be safe and strong and proud and mighty and free.' - President Donald J. Trump'

That really sets the stage for what follows — which is a collection of "facts," some of which are naked lies and others of which are cherry-picked and decontextualized to the point that they might as well be naked lies.

To wit:


It goes on and on like that, written by and for cultists with zero regard for the truth or anything resembling reality. The only "reality" that matters is the one they create.

Despite its aggressive dishonesty, this straight-up copy+paste authoritarian dispatch will not be fact-checked prominently on every news site/channel today. It will be astonishing if it even gets a passing mention.

As I said in comments earlier today: We are witnessing the demise of democracy globally, and our media isn't talking about it.

Donald Trump continues to endeavor to harm us, and the press continues to fail us.

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Olivia the White Farm Cat and Sophie the Torbie Cat sitting on my lap while I'm sitting on the couch
We got cats on laps!

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 501

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Earlier today by me: Giuliani Claims President Couldn't Be Indicted for Murder and The Dominionists Make Their Move.

Here are some more things in the news today...

[Content Note: Sexual harassment] Former President Bill Clinton is on a media tour to promote a fiction book he co-authored with James Patterson, and, during an interview on the Today show, NBC's Craig Melvin asked him about whether the #MeToo movement has changed the lens through which he views his affair with Monica Lewinsky. And his answer was very terrible.

Craig Melvin: [in voiceover] This March, Monica Lewinsky penned an op-ed in Vanity Fair taking responsibility for her part in the scandal, but also admitting that, years later, she was diagnosed with PTSD from the unrelenting public scrutiny. [onscreen, to Bill Clinton] One of the things that this #MeToo era has done, it's forced a lot of women to speak out. One of those women, Monica Lewinsky, she wrote an op-ed that the #MeToo movement changed her view of sexual harassment. Quote: "He was my boss; he was the most powerful man on the planet; he was 27 years my senior with enough life experience to know better; he was, at the time, at the pinnacle of his career, while I was in my first job out of college. Looking back on what happened now, through the lens of #MeToo now, do you think differently? Or feel more responsibility?

Bill Clinton: No, I felt terrible then. And I came to grips with it. And —

Melvin: Did you ever apologize to her?

Clinton: Yes. And nobody believes that I got outta that for free. I left the White House $16 million in debt. But you, typically, have ignored gaping facts in describing this, and I bet you don't even know them. This was litigated 20 years ago; two-thirds of the American people sided with me; they were not insensitive to that. I had a sexual harassment policy when I was governor in the '80s. I had two women chiefs of staff when I was governor. Women were over-represented in the Attorney General's office in the '70s, for their percentage of the bar. I have had nothing but women leaders in my office since I left. You are giving one side and omitting facts.

Melvin: Mr. President, I'm not trying to present a side. I'm not —

Clinton: You asked me if I agreed; the answer is no I don't.

Melvin: And I — well, I asked if you'd ever apologized, and you said you had.

Clinton: I have.

Melvin: You've apologized to her?

Clinton: I've apologized to everybody in the world.
I mean, this is Mitt Romney "binders full of women" level terrible.

And that is worth comment. But it is not worth the outsized coverage it is getting, especially on cable news — because Bill Clinton is not the president anymore and there are far more critical news stories today, like Donald Trump, who is the sitting president, claiming he has the power to pardon himself. For real.


And the news that EPA Chief Scott Pruitt ordered one of his aides to procure a mattress from Trump International Hotel:


This is the way that the Kremlin does business. And now it appears that the White House may be doing business the same way. That is extraordinary and, it shouldn't have to be said, extremely newsworthy.

Which is only the tip of the iceberg of today's news, including two very troubling Supreme Court decisions:


So, yes, absolutely Clinton's dreadful and disappointing (though entirely unsurprising) response is newsworthy, but it is not the most important news of the day by any reasonable calculation. Only by the thoroughly unreasonable calculation that anything the Clintons do warrants endless amounts of scrutiny and alarm while anything Trump does is given a pass for any number of rotating excuses could Bill Clinton be the biggest news of the day.

And, as if on cue...


FOR CRYING OUT LOUD.

I am pissed — pissssssssssssssssed — when progressives fuck up. I couldn't be more annoyed that Samantha Bee used a misogynist slur against Ivanka Trump (both because that's not how feminism works and because I don't want an authoritarian like Ivanka Trump turned into a sympathetic figure), nor more annoyed that Bill Clinton is still defensive over what was a clear case of exploitative workplace sexual harassment, his role in which isn't mitigated by the fact that the Republicans used it to wage a cynical and sanctimousious campaign against him to stymie his political agenda.

But these personal failures, while important because they are also public failures, are simply not as important as the authoritarian takeover by Donald Trump and the Republican Party's consolidation of power behind him, while corporatists wage class warfare and the dominionists relentlessly pursue their objective of a Christian Supremacist nation.


We are fucked. And every day it looks more like the majority of the political media in this country actively wants it that way. This has gone well beyond a mere failure to do their jobs and has entered the territory of conscious participation in the coup.

* * *

In other news...


Michelle Kosinski and Maegan Vazquez at CNN: Trump's Phone Call with Macron Described as 'Terrible'. "A call about trade and migration between [Donald] Trump and French President Emmanuel Macron soured last week after Macron candidly criticized Trump's policies, two sources familiar with the call told CNN. 'Just bad. It was terrible,' one source told CNN. 'Macron thought he would be able to speak his mind, based on the relationship. But Trump can't handle being criticized like that.'" Of course he can't.

[Content Note: White supremacy] Philip Oltermann at the Guardian: New U.S. Ambassador to Germany Under Fire for Rightwing Support. "In an interview with the far-right news outlet Breitbart over the weekend, Richard Grenell, who has been in office for less than a month, said: 'I absolutely want to empower other conservatives throughout Europe, other leaders. I think there is a groundswell of conservative policies that are taking hold because of the failed policies of the left.' In Berlin, the foreign ministry asked him to clarify the comments and politicians criticised him for a perceived breach of diplomatic protocol. 'In the past, Germany was fortunate to have had great US ambassadors who built bridges and did not do party politics,' said Metin Hakverdi‪, a Social Democrat delegate and member of the German-US parliamentary friendship group. 'As a member of the SPD, a left party with a long proud legacy of fighting, together with the United States, both Nazis and communists, I am irritated to hear from ambassador Grenell about our allegedly failed policies.'" Holy shit.

Anthony Faiola and Rachelle Krygier at the Washington Post: A Historic Exodus Is Leaving Venezuela without Teachers, Doctors, and Electricians. "This collapsing socialist state is suffering one of the most dramatic outflows of human talent in modern history... Vast gaps in Venezuela's labor market are causing a breakdown in daily life, and robbing this nation of its future. The exodus is broad and deep — an outflow of doctors, engineers, oil workers, bus drivers, and electricians. And teachers." Awful.


Kate Riga at TPM: Facebook Gave Electronics Makers Access to Tons of Users' Personal Data. "Facebook has allowed electronics manufacturers including Apple, Amazon, and Samsung wide access to personal users' data for years, the scope of which may be in violation of an FTC consent rule, according to a Sunday New York Times report. The deals have reportedly given over 60 device makers access to users' friends' data without obtaining consent." Fucking hell.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

TV Corner: Killing Eve

promotional image of Sandra Oh and Jodie Comer from BBC America's 'Killing Eve'

Now that season one of BBC America's Killing Eve has finished, LET'S TALK ABOUT IT!

I won't spoil anything on the main page, because I didn't know a thing about it going into episode one, and that made it all the more spectacular for me. I hadn't even heard of it when a friend I've known since high school recommended it. Her recommendations are always on point, and this was no exception. I LOVE IT SO MUCH.

I watched the first 20 minutes of the first episode, then turned it off and waited until Iain got home so we could watch it together, because I knew he'd love it, too. We binged all 8 episodes of the first season over a couple of nights. And we couldn't stop screaming at each other about how amazing Sandra Oh is.

"BABE, HER FACE!"

"I KNOW! SHE IS SO GREAT!"

"SHE IS VERY TERRIFIC AT ACTING!"

"HAHAHAHA I CAN'T EVEN DEAL WITH HER SHE IS AMAZING THIS SHOW IS AMAZING AHHHHHHHHHHHH."

Although Sandra Oh was the real standout for both of us, obviously we loved Jodie Comer (ALSO AMAZING) and everyone else in it, because the cast is incredible.

And I had to keep pausing it to exclaim things like, "I just watched an extended scene of two spies talking about an assassin AND THEY WERE ALL WOMEN."

I also loved Villanelle's sardonic mockery of Konstantin. (Really her sardonic mockery of anyone and everyone, but especially Konstantin.) The pretend pouting was always something to behold. Whew!

The only major weak point in the show for me is the relationship between Eve and her husband Niko. I didn't really understand their relationship. I could never get my head around how she felt about him. Maybe that was deliberate; maybe we're supposed to feel like Eve isn't sure how she feels about him. But it felt too nebulous for me to grab hold off, and always felt like a bit of a waste for that reason. I wouldn't have missed it if we'd not gotten a glimpse of Eve's marriage at all.

Anyway! Did you watch it? What did you think?

[If you're considering watching the show, heads-up for scenes of violence and emotional abuse.]

Open Wide...

The Dominionists Make Their Move

[Content Note: Christian Supremacy.]

At the Guardian, David Taylor has a must-read piece on "Project Blitz," the legislative playbook developed by a coaltion of conservative Christian groups which provides "state politicians with a set of off-the-shelf pro-Christian 'model bills' [at least 75 of which] have been brought forward in more than 20 states during 2017 and 2018."

Some legislation uses verbatim language from the "model bills" created by a group called the Congressional Prayer Caucus Foundation (CPCF), set up by a former Republican congressman which has a stated aim to "protect religious freedom, preserve America's Judeo-Christian heritage, and promote prayer."

...Opponents warn that the CPCF (which claims more than 600 politicians as members across state legislatures ) is using the banner of "religious freedom" to impose Christianity on American public, political, and cultural life.
The entire piece is worth your time to read, to get a handle on this dominionist campaign to overwhelm the nation with a very specific brand of conservative evangelical Christianity.

As I noted on Twitter: "This is not Donald Trump's vision. This is the Christian Dominionist hellscape that Mike Pence has always envisioned for the country."

But it's no coincidence that this movement is once again gaining momentum under the presidency of a corrupt businessman, because Christian Supremacy is a corrupt business.

I was writing urgently in this space about how dominionism was being rolled out like a business twelve years ago [CN: discussion of bigotry; slurs]:
Jesus has been hijacked as a political operative by people who have forgotten that the separation of church and state was designed to protect the church as much as the state. Christianity's central figure cannot be redesigned as a gun-toting, gay-bashing, flag-draped ideological icon without fundamentally and inexorably altering the religion itself—particularly how it is regarded by those outwith its margins. Christians who don't want to be associated with the reimagined Jesus have a right—and an obligation—to denounce his being co-opted into the spokesman for Überpatriot Dominionism. Christian Supremacists are rebranding Christ, and hence Christianity. This is nothing if not a marketing war.

Understandably, it's a game that Christians who don't regard Jesus as a mascot don't want to play, but the Christian Supremacy movement in America is a business. Millions and millions of dollars are raised every year by people professing to preach The Word in exchange for a few dollars (and a few more, and a few more) in the collection baskets, but all they're really doing is selling a product—a way to cope with a changing world that robs bigots of their undeserved dominion, that tells them they really, at long last, must share equality with non-Christians, the LGBT community, strong women, minorities, and immigrants in the public sphere. They are losing control they were never meant to have, and Christianity 2.0 sells them the righteous anger and victimhood they need.

In these desperate people, the hate peddlers have found a ripe market for their wares. The hungry buyers come to the churches and the political rallies with money burning holes in the pockets of their sensible trousers, and they leave satiated, their bellies full of (self-)righteous indignation, with a determination to spread the word about the radical homosexual and feminist agendas, and a keen eye for the slightest proof that their suspicions about the dastardly fags and feminazis and liberals and brown people who threaten their way of life are all true. This is a booming business, and Falwell, Dobson, and Robertson have learned to roll out their product as efficiently as Ford and his Model-Ts.

...Hate, like anything else in the American capitalist utopia, can be a splendid business, as long as there are enough interested buyers with cash in hand—and hate flogged under the auspices of religion has the added bonus of being a tax-free enterprise. It's no surprise that Christ-cloaked bigotry is a booming industry. To Christian Supremacists, Jesus is just a logo; he doesn't define their message any more than the Swoosh writes Nike's mission statement. But, like any recognizable symbol to clamoring consumers, he confers upon the brand a status with which generic models just can't compete. Your athletic skills are infinitely better with a famous insignia on your shoes, and your intolerance is remade as virtue with a savior lending his name for the dropping.

Christians who refuse to let Christ be claimed for such purposes are, whether willfully or not, the competition. ...And all the rest of us, who have a vested interest in protecting our country against the ascendancy of Christian Supremacists, are consumer advocates, tasked with pointing out the flaws in their product—and questioning the existence of truth in their advertising.
Well, here we are. And the need to challenge this oppression and hatred being sold under the guise of "religious freedom" is more pressing than ever.

Open Wide...

Giuliani Claims President Couldn't Be Indicted for Murder

In an incredible escalation of Team Trump's absurd argument that the Constitution literally sets the president above the law, Donald Trump's lawyer and bestie Rudy Giuliani — who was once the third-highest ranking member of Reagan's Justice Department — claimed that Trump could not be indicted for murder even if he had shot James Comey instead of just firing him.

S.V. Date at the Huffington Post reports:

"In no case can he be subpoenaed or indicted," Rudy Giuliani told HuffPost Sunday, claiming a president's constitutional powers are that broad. "I don't know how you can indict while he's in office. No matter what it is."

Giuliani said impeachment was the initial remedy for a president's illegal behavior ― even in the extreme hypothetical case of Trump having shot former FBI Director James Comey to end the Russia investigation rather than just firing him.

"If he shot James Comey, he'd be impeached the next day," Giuliani said. "Impeach him, and then you can do whatever you want to do to him."

Norm Eisen, the White House ethics lawyer under President Barack Obama and now a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, said the silliness of Giuliani's claim illustrates how mistaken Trump's lawyers are about presidential power.

"A president could not be prosecuted for murder? Really?" he said. "It is one of many absurd positions that follow from their argument. It is self-evidently wrong."
Not only is it manifestly wrong, but it is utterly chilling what naked contempt the president and his legal team have for the rule of law.

Giuliani's comment echoes Trump's "I could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue" comment, and we should all be extremely alarmed and outraged by the president and his top legal ghoul casually making statements about the president murdering someone, no less his political rivals, no less the Director of the FBI.

(It's also reminiscent of Trump's implicitly threatening comment toward Hillary Clinton at a rally in August of 2016, in which he suggested that "the Second Amendment people" might be able to find a way to stop Clinton from picking judges who would "essentially abolish the Second Amendment." By publicly talking about anyone shooting Comey, Giuliani is putting a target on his back via stochastic terrorism.)

This is utterly vile. And yet there is seemingly no line that this president and his goons can cross that is one line too far for the Republican Party. Disloyal cowards.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of a purple sofa

Hosted by a purple sofa. Have a seat and chat.

Open Wide...

The Virtual Pub Is Open

image of the exterior of a pub which has been photoshopped to be named 'The Pride Pub'
[Explanations: lol your fat. pathetic anger bread. hey your gay.]

Belly up to the bar,
and be in this space together.

Happy Pride Month, everyone! The Pride Flag being flown at the pub incorporates the original Pride colors; the 9-stripe flag unfurled at Love Fest Festival in Febrary during carnival in São Paulo, Brasil, which includes a white stripe in the middle to represent the full gender and sexual spectrum; and the brown and black bands that honor queer people of color in the Pride Flag flown by Philadelphia's City Hall.

Open Wide...

Friday Links!

This list o' links brought to you by the cool breeze of a ceiling fan.

Recommended Reading:

John Detrixhe at Quartz: The Big Visa Disruption Highlights the Risks of Our Electronic Payment Future

Michelle at the Fat Nutritionist: [Content Note: Fat hatred] The Desert Island

Breanna Edwards at the Root: [CN: Misogynoir; harassment] Man Who Called Cops on Black Women Golfing: 'Other Than Her Mouth, There's Not Any Weapons'

Sung Yeon Choimorrow at Reappropriate: [CN: Racism] The Illusion of the Asian American Dream

Staff at the Transgender Law Center: [CN: Transphobia; nativism] Trans Immigrant Petitions U.S. Supreme Court for Case against Discriminatory Indiana Law to Be Heard

AJ Dellinger at Gizmodo: [CN: Automation; class warfare] 50,000 Las Vegas Workers Are Ready to Go on Strike over Fears of Robots Taking Their Jobs

Elise Gould and David Cooper at the Economic Policy Institute: [CN: Class warfare; racism; misogyny] Seven Facts about Tipped Workers and the Tipped Minimum Wage

Angry Asian Man: This Is Really Happening: Ali Wong's and Randall Park's Rom-Com Begins Production. With Keanu. Whoa.

Leave your links and recommendations in comments. Self-promotion welcome and encouraged!

Open Wide...

World of Shakescraft

image of colorful yarn
[Via Shirsty Cat Designs. You can buy their beautiful yarn here.]

As you know, I am not a crafty person. I am terrible at crafts! And I'm only slightly better with DIY home projects, with the occasional modest success.

But lots of Shakers are very talented crafters and DIY-ers, and I am happy to read about all of your terrific projects! So here is a thread to talk about your current crafting and/or DIY project(s), completed projects, or future projects; to share ideas; to brag about your successes or lament your setbacks; and to solicit advice from fellow creators!

(As always, make sure you don't offer advice unless it's solicited.)

Have at it in comments!

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Dudley the Greyhound hinging himself to start a big run in the backyard
"Whoa there's a bee on my butt get me outta here!"

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 498

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Earlier today by me: FYI and Also: Mike Pence and The Press Is Failing Us.

Here are some more things in the news today...

Former CIA Director John Brennan at the Washington Post: I Will Speak Out Until Integrity Returns to the White House.
The presidents I directly served were not perfect, and I didn't agree with all of their policy choices. But I never doubted that each treated their solemn responsibility to lead our nation with anything less than the seriousness, intellectual rigor and principles that it deserved. Many times, I heard them dismiss the political concerns of their advisers, saying, "I don't care about my politics, it's the right thing to do."

The esteem with which I held the presidency was dealt a serious blow when Donald Trump took office. Almost immediately, I began to see a startling aberration from the remarkable, though human, presidents I had served...

Presidents throughout the years have differed in their approaches to policy, based on political platforms, ideologies, and individual beliefs. Mr. Trump, however, has shown highly abnormal behavior by lying routinely to the American people without compunction, intentionally fueling divisions in our country, and actively working to degrade the imperfect but critical institutions that serve us.

Although appalling, those actions shouldn't be surprising. As was the case throughout his business and entertainment careers, Mr. Trump charts his every move according to a calculus of how it will personally help or hurt him. His strategy is to undercut real, potential, and perceived opponents; his focus is to win at all costs, irrespective of truth, ethics, decency, and — many would argue — the law. His disparagement of institutions is designed to short-circuit legitimate law enforcement investigations, intelligence assessments, and media challenges that threaten his interests. His fear of the special counsel's work is especially palpable, as is his growing interest in destroying its mandate.
There is much more at link, and I highly recommend reading the entire thing. I am grateful to Mr. Brennan for speaking out in this way, despite the fact that he fully knows he will be — and already has been — accused of partisanship. This is the right and patriotic thing to do.

And here is former President Bill Clinton doing precisely the same thing, in spite of knowing well that he will be accused of all manner of gross motivations, partisanship the least of them:


* * *

Where's Melania?


I remain concerned about the First Lady. I suspect that she's just going to emerge at some point as if nothing happened, and the press will respond with variations on, "See? There was nothing to worry about, you stupid hysterics. Everything is fine and this is normal." And that will be that.

More gaslighting. Because this? Is not normal.

* * *

Nicole Lafond at TPM: Reporters, Ex-Officials Appalled Trump Hinted at Jobs Report Before Release. "Just before 7:30 a.m. ET, Trump tweeted that he was 'looking forward to seeing the employment numbers' when the report was released at 8:30 a.m. ET, a move that reporters, like Business Insider's Pedro da Costa, are claiming has already influenced markets. ...Experts and former officials have said that at best, Trump broke with expected precedent and at worst, he appeared to violate federal rules barring officials from commenting on data before its release."

Melanie Schmitz at ThinkProgress: Trump's Demand That TBS Fire Samantha Bee May Violate First Amendment. "In a tweet published on Friday morning, [Donald] Trump suggested that TBS fire television host Samantha Bee, after the comedian used a vulgar term to describe White House adviser Ivanka Trump, the president's daughter. But while it's natural for the president to claim a paternal prerogative in defense of his own children, Trump's unique position puts him in sketchy waters with regard to the First Amendment." Sketchy waters. Yes. I suppose that's one way to describe it.


[Content Note: Gun violence] Staff at the Daily Beast: Texas Shooting Victim's Mom: Talking to Trump 'Was Like Talking to a Toddler'. "Trump on Thursday privately met with families affected by the Texas mass shooting that killed 10 and wounded a dozen others at Santa Fe High School. One mother of a student killed in the massacre had a particularly stunning story about her exchange with the president. Per the Associated Press: 'Rhonda Hart, [an Army vet] whose 14-year-old daughter, Kimberly Vaughan, was killed at the school...suggested employing veterans as sentinels in schools. She said Trump responded, 'And arm them?' She replied, 'No,' but said Trump 'kept mentioning' arming classroom teachers. 'It was like talking to a toddler,' Hart said.'"

[CN: Islamophobia; nativism]


[CN: Racism; death] Josh Israel at ThinkProgress: Trump Callously Brags About Puerto Rico Response, Ignoring More Than 4,600 Deaths. "While 11,000 Puerto Ricans still lack electrical power eight months after the storm, the president himself actually praised the botched federal response in remarks on Friday to the U.S. Coast Guard. 'Last season, during the Hurricanes, I was in Texas, I was in Florida, I was in Puerto Rico,' he claimed, 'I saw the work that you did under the most adverse conditions. And I've said this to a lot of people, I don't think any brand has gained more momentum or gained any more of anything than the brand of the United States Coast Guard.'"

[CN: Class warfare] Ed Pilkington at the Guardian: United Nations: U.S. Inequality Reaching a Dangerous Level Due to Trump's 'Cruel' Measures.
Donald Trump is deliberately forcing millions of Americans into financial ruin, cruelly depriving them of food and other basic protections while lavishing vast riches on the super-wealthy, the United Nations monitor on poverty has warned.

Philip Alston, the UN special rapporteur who acts as a watchdog on extreme poverty around the world, has issued a withering critique of the state of America today. Trump is steering the country towards a "dramatic change of direction" that is rewarding the rich and punishing the poor by blocking access even to the most meager necessities.

"This is a systematic attack on America's welfare program that is undermining the social safety net for those who can't cope on their own. Once you start removing any sense of government commitment, you quickly move into cruelty," Alston told the Guardian.

Millions of Americans already struggling to make ends meet faced "ruination," he warned. "If food stamps and access to Medicaid are removed, and housing subsidies cut, then the effect on people living on the margins will be drastic."

Asked to define "ruination," Alston said: "Severe deprivation of food and almost no access to healthcare."
Which is exactly what he promised. I have no fucking idea how anyone could vote for this guy. (I mean, I do. But.)

* * *

Today in corruption and craven Republicans:


Not a comprehensive list, unfortunately. Just a small selection. Sob.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

The Press Is Failing Us

I am totally fed up with press coverage of Donald Trump that is rooted in failing to understand, still, who he is.

Or conspiring to pretend that he is something other than what he decidedly, demonstrably is. And has been. For decades.

In some cases, it's just an unwillingness to accept the reality that he is actually as terrible and as dangerous as he actually is, either because it's too painful to contemplate or because that would mean facing up to their own complicity in his ascension to power by having treated him like a joke and failing to take him seriously far sooner.

In other cases, it's an active attempt to enable and protect him, and abet his vile agenda. (I'm looking at you, New York Times.)

In any case, it's fucking depressing. And enraging. And scary.

Even the outlets and/or individual reporters who are doing a decent job of reporting accurately on what he's doing, day in and day out, are still just documenting, without meaningfully conveying to the public how extraordinarily grave a predicament we're in.

It is just a colossal failure by the press to honestly talk about what's happening; how quickly and profoundly the erosion of our public institutions is happening and how difficult all of it will be to restore.

The comprehensive insistence on treating all of this as "bad, but still within normal range" is gaslighting on an unfathomable sale.

We need facts, and we need straightforward discussion of those facts.

He is a liar. He is a manipulator. He is wildly unethical. He has contempt for the rule of law. He is corrupt. He is colluding, right out in the open. He is cruel. He thinks his abuse is wit.

He is an authoritarian. He hates democracy. He is disloyal to the nation he is meant to lead.

The 2016 election was a coup. Everything since has been a consolidation of power behind a white supremacist, nativist, patriarchal despot.

And we can't even begin to address any of that, if we can't even speak about it plainly.

If the people who try to speak about it plainly are demeaned and dismissed as alarmists hysterics crackpots conspiracists bitches.

If being a person who speaks about it plainly is considered somehow worse, more toxic, embarrassing by the political press than being the authoritarian who thrives in a vacuum of accountability.

The only fate worse than being doomed to lose what you value to the crushing oppression of an authoritarian tyrant is to lose it to the echoing memory of that tyrant being called a clown, until it was far too late.

Open Wide...

Also: Mike Pence


As I have said many times before, Mike Pence's ambition is utterly destructive. He will destroy anything — and anyone — in his way on the path to the presidency.

This is a pretty typical example of that. He is ruthless and cruel. Breathtakingly so.

And if we are ever able to deal with the authoritarian nightmare goblin currently sitting in the Oval Office, we'll still have this terrifying shitlord to contend with.

Open Wide...

FYI

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of a pink couch

Hosted by a pink sofa. Have a seat and chat.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Suggested by Shaker ivyceltress: "What TV shows do you think have aged well?"

The Golden Girls has aged pretty well. Far better than most of the sitcoms of that era.

There are still some cringeworthy jokes, though. Albeit presumably fewer than in the average episode of Cave Man Standing, or whatever that garbage Tim Allen sitcom currently airing is called.

Open Wide...

I've Never...

This is like the drinking game, except without the drinking part, lol.

What is an animal you've always wanted to see in person, even if in captivity, but never have?

I'll start.

A dik-dik! Which is actually a name that encompasses "four species of small antelope in the genus Madoqua that live in the bushlands of eastern and southern Africa." I would like to meet any or all of them, please!

Open Wide...

"A Turning Point"

Background: Trump Launches Trade War with Canada, Mexico, EU.


This thread by Jasmin Mujanović is a pretty terrific short explanation of why I'm feeling so grim about Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's totally understandable comments regarding the state of U.S.-Canada relations after Donald Trump launched a trade war with Canada today:


And then there is this: A fundamental break in relations between the United States and Canada serves the Kremlin's interests and agenda, in a number of ways.

For one, it leaves Canada incredibly vulnerable, if its more populated and militarily stronger neighbor to the south is no longer an ally.

Under Putin's leadership, just in the past few years, Russia has annexed Crimea, made multilple military incursions into Ukraine, and forced Sweden onto a war footing, where it remains two years later.

There is no question that Putin, who declared the collapse of the Soviet Union "the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the century," has dreams of expanding the Russian empire once again. The Nordic countries are in grave danger in a full-scale collapse of U.S.-Canada relations that exposes Canada, with the longest coastline among all of the countries of the world, to Russian control.

I'm aware that sounds like something that could never happen, especially in a world where we've told ourselves that "traditional warfare" is over.

It could happen.

Putin has a goal of destabilization for a reason. And anyone who imagines that he wouldn't conspire to use military force to mount a classic invasion in today's world hasn't been paying attention. Not for the last few years, and not back to the very start of his rule: Although the Russo-Georgian War didn't officially start until August of 2008, Putin laid the groundwork from nearly the moment he took office.
Vladimir Putin became president of the Russian Federation in 2000, which had a profound impact on Russo-Georgian relations. The conflict between Russia and Georgia began to escalate in December 2000, when Georgia became the first and only member of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) on which the Russian visa regime was imposed.
I am not saying this is what will happen; I'm saying this is what could happen. Because what Trump did today was truly seismic. No matter how much the political press may want to pretend it's just business as usual.

It is not.

Open Wide...

What I'm Reading Now

A thread for sharing what we're currently reading: Fiction, nonfiction, novels, short stories, historical fiction, biographies, romance, fanfic, comic books, graphic novels, longform journalism, research papers, stuff for pleasure, stuff for work, whatever.

I'm currently (re)reading The View from Flyover Country: Dispatches from the Forgotten America by Sarah Kendzior. (Buy it here. Also be sure to request it at your local library!)

image of the cover of the book, featuring a midwestern cityscape at night

[Full Disclosure: I think most of y'all know this already, but Sarah and I are friends, and I am mentioned in the acknowledgements.]

I highly, highly recommend this book. Sarah's writing is so important, especially during this time, and if you really want to understand what's happening in this country, reading everything she writes will help immensely.

Also: In addition to being smart AF, she is a wonderful writer. Even when she's writing about some loathsome shit, she is a pleasure to read.

What are you reading now?

Open Wide...