so Olivia curled up in them for a nap. ♥
As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.
“The research suggests that when intolerant white people fear democracy may benefit marginalized people, they abandon their commitment to democracy.”https://t.co/nRkV6ClyrZ
— ashley yates (@brownblaze) May 27, 2018
Bannon's deployment of the psychological-operations firm Cambridge Analytica in the 2016 campaign drew fresh attention this month, when a former Cambridge employee told a U.S. Senate panel that Bannon tried to use the company to suppress the black vote in key states. Carter's story shows for the first time how an employee at Bannon's former news site worked as an off-the-books political operative in the service of a similar goal.It certainly is. But even if an investigation were opened, would it ever get anywhere? Would it ever matter?
Carter's recollections and correspondence, which he shared after a falling-out with his fellow Trump supporters, provide a rare look inside the no-holds-barred nature of the Republican's campaign and how it explored new ways to achieve an age-old political aim: getting the right voters to the polls—and keeping the wrong ones away.
"If you can't stomach Trump, just don't vote for the other people and don't vote at all," Carter, 47, recalls telling black voters. It's the message he says the Trump campaign wanted him to deliver. "That's what they wanted, that's what they got."
The work Carter says he did, and the funds he was given to do it, also raise questions as to whether campaign finance laws were broken.
The group Carter founded, Trump for Urban Communities, never disclosed its spending to the Federal Election Commission—a possible violation of election law. In hindsight, Carter says, he believed he was working for the campaign so he wouldn't have been responsible for reporting the spending.
His descriptions of the operation suggest possible coordination between Trump's campaign and his nominally independent efforts. If there was coordination, election law dictates that any contributions to groups such as his must fall within individual limits: no more than $2,700 for a candidate. One supporter far exceeded that cap, giving about $100,000 to Carter's efforts.
Another potential issue is whether the unusual role played by the Breitbart reporter amounted to an in-kind contribution.
"There are some real problems here," says Lawrence Noble, who served as general counsel at the FEC during Republican and Democratic administrations and is now senior director and general counsel at the Campaign Legal Center, a nonpartisan advocacy organization. "I would think this is more than enough evidence for the FEC to open an investigation."
"I think the idea that they're 'lost' is hyperbole to try and create an issue where I don't really think there is one," Santorum said. "Other than the fact that the bureaucracy — surprise, surprise — doesn't work very well." https://t.co/9GIOOi1IjJ
— Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) May 27, 2018
And 1500 abused/neglected children is neither the subject nor the time for Santorum to sniff about his disdain for the efficacy of a federal bureaucracy he has dedicated his career to undermining.
— Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) May 27, 2018
From this "reassuring" HHS statement on undocumented children: "Additional properties identified by federal agencies are being evaluated by ORR as potential locations for temporary sheltering as a routine part of its management of UAC shelter capacity." https://t.co/ri0gQFhGvB
— Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) May 29, 2018
BREAKING: US Supreme Court declines to consider whether controversial Arkansas law restricting access to medication abortions unconstitutionally burdens a woman's access to abortion services - @PeteWilliamsNBC pic.twitter.com/4LqB2w1zvM
— MSNBC (@MSNBC) May 29, 2018
SCOTUS won't jump into the fight over medication abortion in Arkansas, leaves in place a real bad 8th circuit ruling that could leave the state with one clinic. My background here #TeamLegalhttps://t.co/jvICYsbeum
— Jessica Mason Pieklo (@Hegemommy) May 29, 2018
Purdue Pharma, maker of OxyContin, has long claimed it was unaware of the powerful opioid’s growing abuse until years after it hit the market — but a confidential DOJ report shows that it knew about “significant” abuse in the first years and concealed it. https://t.co/fjdyrDjevq
— Steve Kopack (@SteveKopack) May 29, 2018
A new Harvard study released today estimates that the actual death toll in Puerto Rico from Hurricane Maria is 72 times the official government number.
There have been questions about the accuracy of the official death toll since last year, when officials were forced to acknowledge that, long after the storm, people were continuing "to die at rates far beyond normal."
And of course Donald Trump publicly told Governor Ricardo Rosselló that he could be "very proud" of the low official death toll, which doubled hours after Trump's comment.
Anyone with any sense has suspected that the official death toll was garbage, concealing a number of deaths attributable to the fallout and neglect following the storm. But the actual number is far worse than most people even imagined.
Arelis R. Hernández and Laurie McGinley at the Washington Post report:
At least 4,645 people died as a result of Hurricane Maria and its devastation across Puerto Rico last year, according to a new Harvard study released Tuesday, an estimate that far exceeds the official government death toll, which stands at 64.There is much more at the link.
The study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, found that health-care disruption for the elderly and the loss of basic utility services for the chronically ill had significant impacts across the U.S. territory, which was thrown into chaos after the September hurricane wiped out the electrical grid and had widespread impacts on infrastructure. Some communities were entirely cut off for weeks amid road closures and communications failures.
Researchers in the United States and Puerto Rico, led by scientists at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, calculated the number of deaths by surveying nearly 3,300 randomly chosen households across the island and comparing the estimated post-hurricane death rate to the mortality rate for the year before. Their surveys indicated that the mortality rate was 14.3 deaths per 1,000 residents from Sept. 20 through Dec. 31, 2017, a 62 percent increase in the mortality rate compared to 2016, or 4,645 "excess deaths."
On the night of the 2016 election, when the horrendous result became clear, one of the friends who was at my house that night sighed heavily and said, "Well, we'll just have to win back the House and Senate in 2018." To which I replied, "If we still have free and fair elections in 2018."
Her face dropped; she had not even contemplated that possibility. "Do you think that's possible?!" she exclaimed. I told her it could be; that after a year and a half of covering Donald Trump, I believed him to be a dangerous authoritarian who would not cede power easily — and whose power grab would be abetted by Congressional Republicans.
What I didn't tell her is that I did not just think it was possible; I thought it was likely.
Now, it is a virtual certainty that we will not have free and fair midterm elections. There is no doubt, except that which has been manufactured by disloyal scoundrels, that Russia interfered in the 2016 election — and, having suffered no consequences for that act of war on our democracy, they will absolutely interfere again.
At the same time, the Republican Party has continued to fight against any effort to undercut their attempts at gerrymandering and voter suppression, has refused to ensure election accountability with paper receipts, and has ignored calls for serious audits of electronic voting machines to ensure that they have not been compromised.
This morning, Donald Trump's morning tweetshitz contained this doozy:
The 13 Angry Democrats (plus people who worked 8 years for Obama) working on the rigged Russia Witch Hunt, will be MEDDLING with the mid-term elections, especially now that Republicans (stay tough!) are taking the lead in Polls. There was no Collusion, except by the Democrats!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 29, 2018
It's widely acknowledged that Trump speaks in projection. We should all be very concerned that he's telegraphing what his party is inviting during the midterm elections: "MEDDLING." Which should be obvious enough, anyway, by his failure to address meddling in the last election. https://t.co/7WVtdqy9tA
— Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) May 29, 2018
[Content Note: Domestic violence.]
The last time First Lady Melania Trump made a public appearance was earlier this month, when she introduced her "Be Best" anti-bullying initiative. She then supposedly went into the hospital for a small kidney procedure and hasn't been seen since.
It's now been 18 days.
I've tweeted about this a few times, and the responses are always deeply upsetting. "Who gives a shit" is very common. So is "She's having plastic surgery." Stated with absolute confidence, despite the fact that there is absolutely no way to know this. I'm also getting a lot of assertions that she's in New York, because her Twitter account tags her location there, but it always has; as well as a lot of "the Secret Security confirmed she's in New York," which is not accurate.
So why has Melania not been in public for 18 days, even over a national holiday weekend?
18 days is a long time for anyone to not be seen in public. Especially a person married to someone with a history of domestic violence. It's *responsible* to ask questions in this situation, not "being conspiratorial," as I've seen suggested. https://t.co/cXR9V7jX1Q
— Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) May 29, 2018
This list o' links brought to you by tomato juice.
Recommended Reading:
Anna Silman at the Cut: [Content Note: Childhood sexual abuse; child neglect] The Tale and the Truth About 13-Year-Old Girls
Eve Barlow at Vulture: Lily Allen Won't Be Shamed
Vivian Kane at the Mary Sue: [CN: Disablism] Pete Davidson Responds to Trolls Suggesting Mental Illness Means He Can't Be in a Healthy Relationship
Ashley Young at BYP: [CN: Misogynoir; trauma] I'm Not Bipolar; I'm Just Traumatized: What I Learned about Black Womanhood from My Misdiagnosis
Princess Weekes at the Mary Sue: [CN: Misogyny; harassment] The Well-Deserved Fallout from the Arrested Development Interview Continues
Breanna Edwards at the Root: [CN: Bullying] Philly Teen Who Used to Be Homeless Earns Full Ride to Harvard
Beth Elderkin at io9: Here's the Trailer for the Ursula K. Le Guin Documentary Almost 10 Years in the Making
Leave your links and recommendations in comments. Self-promotion welcome and encouraged!
Cedric O'Bannon tried to ignore the sharp pain in his side and continue filming. The independent journalist, who was documenting a white supremacist rally in Sacramento, said he wanted to capture the neo-Nazi violence against counter-protesters with his GoPro camera.Rage seethe boil.
But the pain soon became overwhelming. He lifted up his blood-soaked shirt and realized that one of the men carrying a pole with a blade on the end of it had stabbed him in the stomach, puncturing him nearly two inches deep. He limped his way to an ambulance.
But the police did not treat O'Bannon like a victim. Records obtained by the Guardian reveal that officers instead monitored his Facebook page and sought to bring six charges against him, including conspiracy, rioting, assault, and unlawful assembly. His presence at the protest — along with his use of the black power fist and "social media posts expressing his ideals" — were proof that he had violated the rights of neo-Nazis at the 26 June 2016 protests, police wrote in a report.
None of the white supremacists have been charged for stabbing O’Bannon.
Read @lindaholmes' great piece on the Arrested Development interview, and consider as you read it how firmly the gender lines were drawn here, and know that a man who *only* harms women is damn well a sexual harasser, no matter the form that harm takes. https://t.co/eGBSDlMRFK
— Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) May 24, 2018
"It was a shocking moment; it was a beautiful moment," she said of hearing the jury's decision to award her $1 billion in damages in a lawsuit against the security company that hired her rapist. "It showed human kindness in its purest form." 😭❤️ https://t.co/TQcNzkWxRf
— Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) May 25, 2018
[Content Note: Nativism; police violence. Please read the previous piece, "WE MUST RESIST: Undocumented Immigrants Are the Canaries in Trump's Despotic Coal Mine," for important background to this one.]
So, in addtion to his usefulness in gaslighting the country as part of a sophisticated messaging strategy to shift the discourse in a way that makes room for authoritarianism, one of the reasons I believe that Rudy Giuliani is back on the scene is that Donald Trump (still) wants him in his cabinet.
Just earlier this week, I wrote: "Kirstjen Nielsen is a Trumpian placeholder if ever I saw one. He wants Rudy Giuliani in there, running a national militarized law enforcement arm of the executive branch, so bad even I can taste it."
This morning, I read this at the Washington Post Josh Dawsey and Nick Miroff:
[Donald] Trump began berating Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen in the Oval Office earlier this spring, according to administration officials, griping about her performance and blaming her for a surge in illegal border crossings."Soaring promises." In case you weren't sure if this is a piece of administration propaganda.
...The president has chastised her on several occasions this spring, including a much-publicized meeting earlier this month when he attacked her in front of the entire Cabinet. He has grown furious because his administration has made little progress building the border wall, and his most ardent supporters have blamed Nielsen for not doing more to halt the caravan of Central American migrants whose advance Trump saw as a personal challenge.
...It remains unclear, according to several people familiar with the situation, how much longer the relationship can last, but the strains illustrate the difficulty faced by Trump subordinates who are tasked with delivering policy solutions to match his most soaring promises.
[Content Note: Nativism; white supremacy; eliminationism; child abuse; violence.]
Donald Trump did not invent terrible immigration policy. U.S. immigration policy has been broken for a very long time. But he has empowered and institutionalized a nativist, white supremacist, anti-immigrant agenda that I have long been warning will underwrite a targeting of U.S. citizens.
In January, the administration did the previously unthinkable: Revoked a naturalized citizen's citizenship, reverting him to a lawful permanent resident and potentially making him subject to deportation. Last week, a border patrol agent detained two women who are citizens and demanded to see ID because they were speaking Spanish in public. This week, the president suggested that that people who protest state violence (police killings) should be removed from the country.
I have said before and will keep saying: This administration's (mis)treatment of undocumented immigrants is their canary in the coal mine. The targeting of undocumented immigrants is intolerable on its face, but understand that whatever they are doing to undocumented immigrants, they will target others in the same way eventually. We must resist their nativist strategies not only because they are cruel and indecent and unjust, but also because if we fail to resist them, they will proliferate.
We cannot turn our backs on undocumented immigrants.
A month ago, PBS' Frontline did a major piece about how the Department of Health and Human Services lost track of over a thousand children, with some of the "unaccompanied minors" they "released to family or other sponsors" ending up in the hands of human traffickers. EJ Montini, an AZCentral columnist, picked up the story earlier this week, which subsequently resulted in a month-old piece in the New York Times being recirculated and getting lots of attention today.
This heinous story is notable not only for the depth of depravity the United States government is exhibiting toward undocumented children, but for how we must understand what it means in the context of a nativist agenda that is being used for a practice run for the treatment of any and all "undesirables" in the population under authoritarian leadership.
We are meant to not care about undocumented children, lost in a system. And that is why, in addition to the basic decency of protecting children, we must urgently care for them, and what is being done to them.
On Twitter, Yonatan Zunger has written a chilling but necessary thread on this story, detailing the breathtaking scope of the harm and what history tells us may come next. I encourage you to read the entire thread, which begins at the link, but following is an excerpt:
If anyone was wondering why people have been sounding the alarm so hard about the complete lack of legal accountability of police, "they can disappear children by the thousands and nobody can do anything about it" would be why.
— (((Yonatan Zunger))) (@yonatanzunger) May 25, 2018
So the current run rate is probably around 20,000 children per year. Trump, Kelly (who, remember, headed DHS for Trump before being his chief of staff), and Sessions have all been very clear that they intend to grow and expand the program.
— (((Yonatan Zunger))) (@yonatanzunger) May 25, 2018
Hi. We're going to do some serious fucking analysis of this, making real engineering estimates, the way that I promise you ICE is. This is not going to be pleasant, if you were somehow expecting that.
— (((Yonatan Zunger))) (@yonatanzunger) May 25, 2018
So you would need to set up some kinds of facilities where large numbers of children could be warehoused, under guard, until ultimately… well, that's an interesting question that we'll come to in a moment. But first, if they wanted to scale, they'd need warehousing. So:
— (((Yonatan Zunger))) (@yonatanzunger) May 25, 2018
If you want to understand how these things have worked in the past, and feel like not sleeping for the next week or more, look up "Volkswagen baby nursery." I'm not going to link it; even thinking about reading that again makes me feel ill.
— (((Yonatan Zunger))) (@yonatanzunger) May 25, 2018
A weeping mother has been forced to wear a yellow insignia (bracelet) as she is ripped away from her children indefinitely.
— Adam Klasfeld (@KlasfeldReports) May 25, 2018
In the United States. By policy.
Read this story.https://t.co/kUdogZ2B6L pic.twitter.com/vQ7XutNDiR
ICE Plans to Start Destroying Records of Immigrant Abuse, Including Sexual Assault and Deaths in Custody https://t.co/pPVzjHXvxD via @aclu
— Garance Franke-Ruta (@thegarance) May 25, 2018

During an Oval Office meeting last February, Trump acted as if he was at a rally, making up Hispanic names and noting crimes they might have committed -- saying the crowd would roar for deportations. Jared Kushner and Stephen Miller laughed. https://t.co/3rLF1J73q4 pic.twitter.com/N9SqiJkg1d
— Josh Dawsey (@jdawsey1) May 25, 2018
Today, when you arrive at Shakesville and when you open comments, you may be served notices from Google/Blogger and Disqus regarding cookies used and data collected, in compliance with European Union laws, as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) takes effect today.
In case you are not automatically served those notices, Google's disclosures can be found here: Google Privacy Policy and How Google Uses Information from Sites or Apps That Use Our Services. And Disqus' disclosures can be found here: Update on Privacy and GDPR Compliance.
This blog is hosted on Google/Blogger and has a third-party commenting system provided by Disqus. Because this is an ad-free space, there are no advertising corporations collecting user data. Huzzah!
If, at any point in the future, additional third-party vendors are added to this site, I will disclose that information, as required by the GDPR.
A permanent link to this post will be added to the Comment Policy.
Carry on!
Suggested by Shaker BlueJean: "What's your favorite remake, and why? (I've grown attached to the Japanese remake of Ghost, where the business executive/ghost is a woman and the potter is a man. Better special effects, too, though the ending isn't as satisfying.)"
Off the top of my head, I can't think of any remakes I prefer to the original material — not that that was a stipulation of BlueJean's question, anyway — so, with that caveat, my favorite remake is probably A Bug's Life, which is a splendid remake of Akira Kurosawa's Seven Samurai.
You might be thinking: Liss, that is just an homage, not a remake!
But oh no, my friend. It is a remake. 😀
Cool. https://t.co/BESmyDi3jT
— Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) May 24, 2018
Shelby Holliday and Rob Barry at the Wall Street Journal: Roger Stone Sought Information on Clinton from Assange, Emails Show.
Former Trump campaign adviser Roger Stone privately sought information he considered damaging to Hillary Clinton from WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange during the 2016 presidential campaign, according to emails reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.So, we'll pause here briefly to note a couple of things:
The emails could raise new questions about Mr. Stone's testimony before the House Intelligence Committee in September, in which he said he "merely wanted confirmation" from an acquaintance that Mr. Assange had information about Mrs. Clinton, according to a portion of the transcript that was made public.
In a Sept. 18, 2016, message, Mr. Stone urged an acquaintance who knew Mr. Assange to ask the WikiLeaks founder for emails related to Mrs. Clinton's alleged role in disrupting a purported Libyan peace deal in 2011 when she was secretary of state, referring to her by her initials.
"Please ask Assange for any State or HRC e-mail from August 10 to August 30--particularly on August 20, 2011," Mr. Stone wrote to Randy Credico, a New York radio personality who had interviewed Mr. Assange several weeks earlier. Mr. Stone, a longtime confidant of Mr. Trump, had no formal role in his campaign at the time.
[Schiff] said the emails hadn't been provided to congressional investigators.Two, that as noted by former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti, "It is a federal crime to knowingly receive stolen material that has crossed a national or international boundary."
"If there is such a document, then it would mean that his testimony was either deliberately incomplete or deliberately false," said Mr. Schiff, who has continued to request documents and conduct interviews with witnesses despite the committee's probe concluding earlier this year.
Mr. Stone, in a text message to the Journal, said that Mr. Credico had "provided nothing" to him and that WikiLeaks never handed anything over.Maybe. Or maybe not. Roger Stone isn't known for his rigorous honesty. Either way, the very fact that he was soliciting State Department emails, which would have had to be stolen for him to access them, is a problem. And the likelihood that he omitted information during his congressional testimony could be a crime.
I am again participating in the #365feministselfie project, now in its fifth year, and promised a thread for others to share selfies and/or talk about the project, visibility generally, self-apprecation, and related topics. So here is a thread for Week 21!
A few of my selfies over the last three weeks:
JUST IN: Pres. Trump says U.S. military is "ready if necessary," adding Japan and South Korea are "willing to shoulder much of the cost of any financial burden...by the United States in operations, if such an unfortunate situation is forced upon us." https://t.co/aRUXu8ETIv pic.twitter.com/bfzmMDIDUd
— ABC News (@ABC) May 24, 2018
I've spoken to General Mattis and the Joint Chiefs of Staff and our military, which is by far the most powerful anywhere in the world, and has been greatly enhanced recently, as you all know, is ready, if necessary. Likewise, I've spoken to South Korea and Japan, and they are not only ready, should foolish or reckless acts be taken by North Korea, but they are willing to shoulder much of the cost of any financial burden, any of the costs associated, by the United States in operations, if such an unfortunate situation is forced upon us.Remember what it was like when we had a president who wasn't just wantonly threatening and provoking war every goddamn day? That was nice.
"White House press secretary Sarah Sanders says it bugs her when people accuse of her lying to the press. 'It certainly bothers me... Because one of the few things you have are your integrity and reputation." Oh maybe stop lying then? https://t.co/oY1eZTd6Yn
— Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) May 24, 2018
Thousands of women and girls who believed they were being led to safety from Boko Haram by Nigerian security forces were instead systematically abused in exchange for food and assistance, an Amnesty International investigation has revealed.My god. That the international community has allowed this nightmare to go on endlessly is a shame on all of us. It truly is.
The shocking claims were made by more than 250 people interviewed over a two-year period. Some allege they were raped by members of the Nigerian military and Civilian Joint Task Force (Civilian JTF), while others say they were starved. The troops ordered civilians out of their villages and into satellite camps, where thousands of people, including children, have died of hunger, the report claims.
"The soldiers, they betrayed us — they said that we should come out from our villages," said Yakura*, 35, who fled her home in December 2016, believing the government soldiers were delivering her and her family to safety. "They said it would be safer and that they would give us a secure place to stay. But when we came, they betrayed us. They detained our husbands and then they raped us women."
"Black women are moving from winning elections for others to winning elections for themselves." 🔥 https://t.co/YISUG5b19B
— Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) May 24, 2018
Copyright 2009 Shakesville. Powered by Blogger. Blogger Showcase
Blogger Templates created by Deluxe Templates. Wordpress by K2