Keep Shakesville Truckin'

image of a white piggy bank wearing black glasses, into which three pennies are falling, accompanied by text reading: 'Bi-Monthly Fundraising Reminder | Your donations are necessary to support Shakesville's daily content & vibrant community in an ad-free space.'

teaspoon icon This is, for those who have requested it, your bi-monthly reminder to donate to Shakesville and an important fundraiser to keep Shakesville going.

To keep doing this job, and to keep Shakesville a safe ad-free space, I need to be making enough through donations to support myself. Although Iain and I combine resources, like many couples, I don't want to find myself in a place where I couldn't support myself on my own if I needed and/or wanted to.

So this full-time gig has to pay me a livable wage for my time, and enough to pay contributing writers for their work, or I need to find another way to make a living. I'm not looking to get rich off this work. I simply want to make enough money that I am able to support myself modestly, in exchange for my full-time labor.

So, if you value the content and/or community in this space, please consider setting up a subscription or making a single end-of-year contribution.

Please click the button below to make a one-time donation:



Or use the below dropdown menu to choose set up a recurring monthly donation:

Subscription Options




I cannot afford to do this full-time for free, but, even if I could, fundraising is also one of the most feminist acts I do here. I ask to be paid for my work because progressive feminist advocacy has value; because women's work has value.

So! If you value my work here and/or on Twitter — if you have appreciated being able to tune in for coverage of politics, for deconstruction of the rape culture, for curated news about the Trump administration and/or the resistance, for media analysis, for a safe and image-free space to discuss difficult subjects, for the Fat Fashion or Make-Up or Shaker Gourmet threads, or for whatever else you appreciate at Shakesville, whether it's the moderation, community in the Open Threads, video transcripts, the blogarounds, or anything else — please remember that Shakesville is run exclusively on donations. I would certainly be grateful for your support, if you are able to chip in.

Thank you to each of you who donates or has donated, whether monthly or as a one-off. I am deeply appreciative. This community couldn't exist without that support, truly. Thank you.

My thanks as well to everyone who contributes to the space in other ways, whether as a contributor, a moderator, a guest writer, a transcriber, and/or as someone who takes the time to send me a note of support and encouragement, some cool art, or anything else you think might give me a smile or fill my lungs with air. (You're usually right!) This community couldn't exist without you, either.

Finally and essentially: Please note that I don't want anyone to feel obliged to contribute financially, especially if money is tight. There is a big enough readership that no one needs to donate if it would be a hardship, and no one should ever feel bad about that.

I mean that. We're all in this thing together.

One of the things I hate most about fundraising is knowing that it might make some people feel bad, if they want to donate but aren't able. I would never presume to tell you how to feel, but please know that I don't want you to feel bad.

What I want is for you to know that, some days, your kind words are the only thing that keeps me going. I need money to survive. It is your encouragement that keeps me doing this work. You support me in many ways, and I am immensely thankful for them all. ♥

Open Wide...

The Trade War Is Escalating Quickly

Yesterday, the Trump administration published a list of about 1,300 Chinese exports that could be targeted for 25% tariffs, and China announced it would impose tariffs on pork and ethanol. Today, the trade war has escalated again, with China announcing "new tariffs on 106 US products, including soy, cars, and chemicals."

China announced additional tariffs on 106 U.S. products on Wednesday, in a move likely to heighten global concerns of a tit-for-tat trade war between the world's biggest economies.

The effective start date for the new charges was not announced, though China's Ministry of Commerce said the tariffs are designed to target up to $50 billion of U.S. products annually.

The 25 percent levy on U.S. imports includes products such as soybeans, cars, and whiskey, Beijing said. The full list can be found here.

The move comes less than 24 hours after [Donald] Trump unveiled a list of Chinese imports that he aims to target as part of a crackdown on what he deems as unfair trade practices.
Trump is provoking this trade war with China despite the fact that farmers have warned it will devastate the agriculture sector. A 25% tariff on soybeans will devastate a huge part of the U.S. economy.

And it's a senseless provocation in the middle of tensions with North Korea, when we desperately need a solid diplomatic relationship with China.

This is so fucking stupid.

Open Wide...

On Trump Being an Anonymous Source and the Political Press Being Stenographers for an Authoritarian Liar

Donald Trump has a long history of positioning himself as an "anonymous" source of information flattering to himself. When he was just a private megalomaniac desperately seeking the approval of New York City's elite, he used to call journalists and pretend to be his own publicist using a fake name:

A recording obtained by The Washington Post captures what New York reporters and editors who covered Trump's early career experienced in the 1970s, '80s and '90s: Calls from Trump's Manhattan office that resulted in conversations with "John Miller" or "John Barron" — public-relations men who sound precisely like Trump himself — who indeed are Trump, masquerading as an unusually helpful and boastful advocate for himself, according to the journalists and several of Trump's top aides.

...Some reporters found the calls from Miller or Barron disturbing or even creepy; others thought they were just examples of Trump being playful.
"Playful" is certainly one way of describing a profligate liar with an insatiable ego who has zero compunction about manipulating the press for his own self-aggrandizement.

Now that this vainglorious fabulist is President of the United States, there is nothing "playful" about his continued attempts to manipulate the press, even as he continues to wage war on their independence.

A number of news outlets are clearly eager to act as stenographers for Trump while concealing him as their source, because they want to broadcast exclusive scoops. Still others appear willing to act as stenographers to convince Trump to back down from his relentless assaults.

In either case, it's chilling to see the complicity of significant portions of the political press — and their unconscionable willingness to conceal that Trump, a shameless and reflexive liar, is their source.

During a recent Late Night segment, political reporter McKay Coppins told Seth Meyers about how Donald Trump routinely acts as a source for the flattering news he wants disseminated, but tells journalists to cite an anonymous source, and they accommodate him.

The relevant portion starts at 3:35.

Meyers: I want to talk about sourcing real quick, because, you know, it seems like we hear so much coming out of this White House, more than maybe we've ever had, uh, we've ever heard. Is it because, from the very top, he is a source? That he is talking to the press so often that the people underneath him feel the freedom to do the same?

Coppins: [grinning and chuckling throughout this whole tale] Yeah, absolutely. You know, it's funny, like, Trump does this thing where, after his day's work is done, he'll retire to the residence of the White House and just kind of make freewheeling phone calls to like random people.

Meyers: Yeah.

Coppins: Um, and sometimes they're like fellow billionaire pals, and sometimes they're media people, and sometimes they're reporters. And, and, it's funny, I've had experiences with this, even when I was interviewing him at Mar-a-Lago, where he'll be talking and he'll tell you a story and he'll be like, "Okay, this part's off the record. Well, now this part — just attribute it to someone else." Or whatever. And he'll just — he'll be, he'll just put random stuff out there and that — a lot of the stories you see in, uh, in the press are — it'll say like, "somebody familiar with the situation," or like "a senior White House official," and it'll be the President of the United States.

[audience laughter]

Meyers: Yeah. A lurking, slow-moving mass of a man. [Coppins bursts out laughing] Did — and do you think, like — but that actually seems like he's thinking about it more than we may be giving him credit for. So while he's telling a story, he is at least aware enough to know which parts to pull off the record and put on the record...?

Coppins: Yeah, in my experience, at least, it was the parts that he wanted me to write that were flattering about him but that he didn't want to have it attributed to him.

Meyers: Got it.

Coppins: So [laughs] it'll be like some heroic story about him, or a story about some celebrity who said he was the greatest ever of something, you know? "Put that off the record! Just don't use my name on that!"

Meyers: [laughs] So he wants it out there, but he wants it —

Coppins: Exactly.

Meyers: — to seem like it came from another source.

Coppins: Right.
This is an ostensibly serious political journalist laughing about how he prints flattering garbage the compulsive liar sitting in the Oval Office wants him to print, and then contrives to conceal that said compulsive liar is the source of that information.

In his new book, The Trump White House: Changing the Rules of the Game, Ronald Kessler confirms Coppins' report, writing that Trump "has a number of journalists he frequently contacts, and leaks to on the condition that he be identified only as one of his own unnamed staff members."
"Trump phones Maggie Haberman of the New York Times directly, as well as Philip Rucker of the Washington Post, and Jonathan Swan of Axios, feeding them stories attributed to 'a senior White House official,' creating the impression the White House leaks even more than it already does," Kessler writes.
Consider the number of times you have heard theories of chronic chaos and insubordination and incompetence and variations on the specter of a White House out of Trump's control, based on the premise of relentless leaking — and now consider what it means if many, or even most, of those leaks were Trump himself.

And consider what it means that significant portions of the established political press are willing to indulge an authoritarian liar, at the expense of transparency, denying the public any chance of understanding what's truly happening with the government meant to represent us.

How might it change your perception of the Trump administration if every story you've ever read about an increasingly unhinged Trump bellowing at cowering staff was a straight-up lie planted by Trump himself, who then sat back laughing at responses that understandably presume he has lost control of the most powerful office on the planet?

Getting off on people's profound misunderstandings based on misdirections he planted with an obliging press sounds exactly like Donald Trump.

Bullies love pranks — and what is a prank but getting one up on someone who is vulnerable, by virtue of their trusting the prankster because of an existing relationship or by virtue of being deliberately denied relevant information or by virtue of having an expectation of safety or security or normalcy.

We are vulnerable for all of these reasons.

We are vulnerable because we are meant to be able to trust the person who holds the office of the president, and because we are meant to be able to trust the press.

We are vulnerable because we are being denied relevant information — namely that Donald Trump is feeding lies to the media who then report those lies as though they may be true.

We are vulnerable because we have an expectation of safety and security and normalcy, all of which Trump has undermined and continues to subvert with the assistance of the compliant cadre of stenographers who have abandoned all pretense of challenging power on behalf of the powerless.

We are vulnerable — and we are fucked. Because our president is a goddamned liar, and, instead of reporting that, the media endeavors to conceal it.

Open Wide...

Yesterday Was a Troubling Day in Mueller News

I have long been worried that Special Counsel Bob Mueller's investigation will effectively, even if not intentionally, create loads of time and space for Republicans to so thoroughly consolidate power that they won't have to care about his conclusions, even if those eventual conclusions — which we may or may not see, at Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein's discretion — do include recommendations for serious, meaningful repercussions for the Trump administration, Donald Trump's associates, and/or people who colluded to influence the 2016 election.

Yesterday came the first sentencing in Mueller's investigation: Dutch Attorney Alex Van Der Zwaan, who is the son of a Russian oligarch named German Khan, got 30 days in jail and a $20k fine for charges brought in February regarding his having made false statements to the FBI about contact with Rick Gates, deputy chair of Trump's 2016 campaign.

Also yesterday, the Washington Post published a notable report by Carol D. Leonnig and Robert Costa: "Mueller Told Trump's Attorneys the President Remains Under Investigation But Is Not Currently a Criminal Target."

Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III informed [Donald] Trump's attorneys last month that he is continuing to investigate the president but does not consider him a criminal target at this point, according to three people familiar with the discussions.

In private negotiations in early March about a possible presidential interview, Mueller described Trump as a subject of his investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 election. Prosecutors view someone as a subject when that person has engaged in conduct that is under investigation but there is not sufficient evidence to bring charges.

The special counsel also told Trump's lawyers that he is preparing a report about the president's actions while in office and potential obstruction of justice, according to two people with knowledge of the conversations.

Mueller reiterated the need to interview Trump — both to understand whether he had any corrupt intent to thwart the Russia investigation and to complete this portion of his probe, the people said.
So, a couple of curious things about that disclosure: First, Mueller told Trump a month ago that he was not "currently" a criminal target. The investigation has continued in the interim. Presumably, Trump is nonetheless still not a criminal target — but, if that's the case, why is the story only about what Mueller told Trump a month ago?

That suggests the sources don't know for certain whether Trump continues not to be considered a criminal target, which means this information is less likely to be coming from Mueller's team and more likely to be coming from Trump's team.

If that is the case, then this report is a response to the day's earlier news about Van Der Zwaan's sentencing. It also means that the WaPo is carrying water for the Trump administration, but endeavoring to conceal its role in disseminating Trump propaganda, as McKay Coppins recently disclosed is common practice among reporters.

If that is indeed what the WaPo is doing, it's happening in the context of Trump waging a war on Amazon because its owner, Jeff Bezos, also owns the WaPo. It looks an awful lot to me like the WaPo agreed to publish a story favorable to the president to get him to lay off his criticism of Amazon. Not good.

And if I'm wrong, and the sourcing for the story was from Mueller's team, then what we have is a whole other problem — because that means that Mueller chose to broadcast he's laying off the president on the same day a light sentence was handed out, which sends a very particular message. Not good, either.

All of this on the same day that Rosenstein announced he appointed Edward O'Callaghan to serve as the acting Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General, positioning him to "oversee the FBI's ongoing investigation into alleged Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election."


None of these things strike me as good signs. Or even neutral ones.

As ever on this subject, I hope that I am wrong.

I don't enjoy, at all, filling the role of a cynic about the potential for holding Trump accountable. To the absolute contrary, I wish I had abundant faith in the process, and that I was writing instead a piece detailing all the reasons I was hopeful some meaningful accountability was imminent.

But that would not be an honest assessment. The truth is that I am very troubled. And if you are, too, you're not alone.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of a red couch

Hosted by a red sofa. Have a seat and chat.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Suggested by Shaker Alittletiefling: "What is your favourite Classical composer/piece/work/instrument? It doesn't have to be Western Classical music, it could be from anywhere."

My favorite, who is a contemporary classical composer, is Michael Nyman. His music does something to me I can hardly begin to articulate. It reaches down deep inside of me and twists all my most profound feelings of joy and sadness together, and turns them into a feeling so overwhelming that it forces tears to spill from my eyes.

Here is "Musique à Grande Vitesse," which Nyman composed to celebrate the opening of the Train à Grande Vitesse high-speed rail line between Paris and Lille in 1993:

Open Wide...

Your Best Photograph

If you're a photographer, even if a very amateur one (like myself), and you've got a photo or photos you'd like to share, here's your thread for that!

It doesn't really have to be your best photograph—just one you like!

Please be sure if your photo contains people other than yourself, that you have the explicit consent of the people in the photos before posting them.

* * *

I snapped this picture of the interstate at dusk on the way home from Baltimore this weekend:

image of the sky at dusk, over the highway

I love the colors of the sky here, and the silhouettes of the signs and cars, with their twinkling lights poking through the descending evening darkness.

Open Wide...

Cell Phone Spying in DC: Trump Needs to Be Removed NOW, Along with the Rest of His Deplorable Party


What is there to say anymore? That the Republican Party still refuses to take action to deal with this sickening wreck of a presidency is beyond the fucking beyond at this point.

Their collusion is right out in the open, too — in the form of glaring inaction.

Open Wide...

Discussion Thread: Good Things

One of the ways we resist the demoralization and despair in which exploiters of fear like Trump thrive is to keep talking about the good things in our lives.

Because, even though it feels very much (and rightly so) like we are losing so many things we value, there are still daily moments of joy or achievement or love or empowering ferocity or other kinds of fulfillment.

Maybe you've experienced something big worth celebrating; maybe you've just had a precious moment of contentment; maybe getting out of bed this morning was a success worthy of mention.

News items worth celebrating are also welcome.

So, whatever you have to share that's good, here's a place to do it.

* * *

I had a really wonderful dinner with Iain last night at a terrific local Mexican restaurant, which ended with perfectly cooked churros, just the right amount of warm when they arrived at the table.

That was very good.

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of both dogs and both cats lying on the couch
Everyone's all, "Hey!" except Olivia, who's like, "Nope." LOL.

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 439

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Earlier today by me: The U.S. President Continues His War on the Free Press and EPA Chief Scott Pruitt Will Weaken Emissions Standards.

Here are some more things in the news today...


Oh. A "computer failure," huh? That affects half of the flights in Europe, you say? That sounds normal.

(That does not sound normal.)

[Content Note: Video may autoplay at link] Cristina Maza at Newsweek: Will Russia Cut Underwater Internet Cables? Military Leaders Warn Suspicious Naval Activity Could Have Catastrophic Consequences.
Russian activity near underwater internet cables is causing concern once again, as a U.S. naval commander warned this week of suspicious activity unlike any seen since the Cold War.

Russian ships have allegedly been lurking near the underwater cables, sparking concern that Moscow might be planning to either cut the cables completely or use them to intercept communications.

Around 400 fiber-optic cables are responsible for transporting data for most of the world's emails, text messages, and phone calls. Cutting several of the cables at strategic points could have a major impact on communication channels worldwide. General Curtis Scaparrotti, commander of the U.S. European Command, told Congress in March that Russian naval ships and submarines are poking around the cables.

It's unclear exactly what the Russian submarines are doing, but experts have said they suspect Russia is collecting information that would allow it to tamper with the cables quickly if a major conflict broke out.
By way of reminder: Russian diplomats, presumed to be Russian intelligence agents, have been "waging a quiet effort to map the United States' telecommunications infrastructure, perhaps preparing for an opportunity to disrupt it," and Russia has developed "a cyberweapon that has the potential to be the most disruptive yet against electric systems that Americans depend on for daily life."

And the United States has a president who is Vladimir Putin's stooge, and whose occasional willingness to look like he cares about Russian aggression is transparent horseshit:


Meanwhile, we keep getting news about what that president is doing from the Kremlin: "Trump proposed meeting Vladimir Putin at the White House in a March phone call, the Kremlin said Monday, a fresh revelation about a conversation that stirred controversy over Trump's friendly tone toward the Russian leader amid mounting tensions with the West. After the March 20 phone call — in which Trump congratulated Putin for a reelection victory in a vote widely criticized as not free and fair — Trump told reporters that the two leaders had discussed a possible meeting to discuss Syria, Ukraine, North Korea, and 'the arms race.'"

And the media is still largely failing to straightforwardly address what is happening. For example:


We are in real trouble, my friends. As far as I can tell, it looks like we are fucked if Donald Trump continues to do Putin's bidding, for obvious reasons, and we are fucked if he doesn't, because Putin is prepared to pull the trigger on our infrastructure. Which he may do anyway, once Trump outlives his usefulness.

Fucking hell. Maude save us. Because no one else is coming.


Welp.

Judd Legum at ThinkProgress: At Chicago Nightclub, George Papadopoulos Allegedly Makes Explosive New Claim About Jeff Sessions. "On Thursday at a Chicago nightclub, Papadopoulos had some drinks and, in a conversation with a new acquaintance, allegedly made new and explosive claims about Attorney General Jeff Sessions. Papadopoulos, according to this new acquaintance, said that Sessions was well aware of the contact between Papadopoulos and Joseph Mifsud, an academic from Malta with high-level connections in Russia. Papadopoulos' indictment revealed that Mifsud had told Papadopoulos that the Russians had ''dirt' on then-candidate Hillary Clinton in the form of 'thousands of emails.'' Jason Wilson, a computer engineer who lives in Chicago, told ThinkProgress that Papadopoulos said during their conversation that 'Sessions encouraged me' to find out anything he could about the hacked Hillary Clinton emails that Mifsud had mentioned."

Wonder if that will matter. Wonder if anything ever will.

* * *

[CN: Nativism; militarism]


Not good. Not good at all.

Relatedly:


* * *


Jill McCabe at the Washington Post: The President Attacked My Reputation; It's Time to Set the Record Straight.
I am an emergency room pediatrician and an accidental politician — someone who never thought much about politics until I was recruited to run for state office after making a statement about the importance of expanding Medicaid. That decision — plus some twisted reporting and presidential tweets — ended up costing my husband, Andrew, his job and our family a significant portion of his pension my husband had worked hard for over 21 years of federal service. For the past year and a half of this nightmare, I have not been free to speak out about what happened. Now that Andrew has been fired, I am.

One day in 2014, an entourage of politicians came through the ER, and a reporter pulled me aside to ask how Medicaid expansion would affect my patients. I did not think any more of it until a year later, when I received a voice mail asking whether I might be interested in running for the state Senate.

I was stunned... [Later] I started to become more interested, thinking, "Here's a way I can really try to help people on a bigger scale than what I do every day."

...I lost my race in November 2015. It was disappointing, and particularly hard for me because I have always been the kind of person who gives everything her all. But I felt good about my effort and enjoyed returning to normal life.

Almost a year later, everything changed. A reporter called my cellphone on a Sunday in October 2016, asking questions about contributions to my campaign and whether there had been any influence on Andrew's decisions at the FBI.

This could not be further from the truth. In fact, it makes no sense. Andrew's involvement in the Clinton investigation came not only after the contributions were made to my campaign but also after the race was over.

...After the 2016 election, I thought for a while that it was all over — at least now that [Donald] Trump won, he would stop coming after us. How naive that was.

...I have spent countless hours trying to understand how the president and so many others can share such destructive lies about me. Ultimately I believe it somehow never occurred to them that I could be a serious, independent-minded physician who wanted to run for office for legitimate reasons. They rapidly jumped to the conclusion that I must be corrupt, as part of what I believe to be an effort to vilify us to suit their needs.
Just another reminder that Donald Trump is not just a terrible and deeply unethical president, but an absolute horror show of a human being.

[CN: Sexual assault] "If"?


[CN: Class warfare] Addy Baird at ThinkProgress: GOP Congressman 'Outraged' That Homeless People in His County Will Get a Place to Sleep. "Republicans have made a habit of saying the quiet part out loud lately — and Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) appears to be the latest offender. ...'As a parent who owns a modest home in an Orange County neighborhood, I join the outrage that we are assuming responsibility for homeless people, taking care of their basic needs, and elongating their agony by removing the necessity to make fundamental decisions about the way they live their lives,' he said. Providing them with 'a place to stay and basic sustenance,' he added, 'will not change them for the better and will encourage more such people to come to Orange County.'" Republicans think people aren't entitled to food. Or shelter.

And finally, in GOOD RESISTANCE NEWS...

Robyn Powell at Rewire: Sen. Tammy Duckworth Saves the Americans with Disabilities Act — for Now. "Last week, Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) and 42 of her Democratic Senate colleagues wrote to Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) pledging to block a vote on the ADA Education and Reform Act (HR 620). Passed in the U.S. House of Representatives in February, HR 620 would devastate the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) by undermining enforcement provisions that safeguard accessibility in public accommodations. Forty-three senators committing to oppose a Senate version of HR 620 is enough to filibuster the legislation, making it unlikely that a vote will go to the floor at this time. This, advocates say, warrants a celebration."

WOOT!!!

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

EPA Chief Scott Pruitt Will Weaken Emissions Standards

Every day, there is an overflowing well of bad news about the nefarious machinations of the profoundly corrupt and cruel Trump administration. So much of it is about Trump himself that it's easy to lose track of all the trash-doings by the rest of his horrendous crew.

One of the worst offenders is EPA Chief Scott Pruitt, about whom there's been a flurry of bad news the past few days:

Eric Lipton at the New York Times: Pruitt Had a $50-a-Day Condo Linked to Lobbyists; Their Client's Project Got Approved.

Sam Stein and Lachlan Markay at the Daily Beast: EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt's Lobbyist-Owned Pad Was GOP Fundraising Hub.

Elaina Plott and Robinson Meyer at the Atlantic: Scott Pruitt Bypassed the White House to Give Big Raises to Favorite Aides.

Juliet Eilperin and Brady Dennis at the Washington Post: EPA Explored Private Jet Lease for Pruitt's Travels Last Year.

And dueling reports that the White House considered firing Pruitt and that the White House has his back.

I'm quite certain the White House has Pruitt's back so long as he continues to do that with which he was tasked: Destroying the integrity of the EPA and using his power as chief to roll back regulations instituted to protect the environment.

Among all the other news about the deeply corrupt Pruitt is some news about how he is definitely still doing that job — to our collective misfortune.

Mark Hard at ThinkProgress: EPA Chief Scott Pruitt to Weaken Fuel Efficiency and Emissions Standards for New Cars.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced plans on Monday to roll back tailpipe emissions standards for automakers established by the Obama administration. The decision is expected to increase greenhouse gases and other harmful emissions from the transportation sector — the largest carbon-emitting sector in the nation.

According to EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt, proposed greenhouse gas emission standards for cars, pick-up trucks, and sport utility vehicles for model years 2022-2025 are too aggressive.
That air you like breathing so much risked becoming too clean. Can't have that.

This, as hospitals have decided it's more profitable to neglect asthma than fix it, and as the Republican Party continues to try to erode access to healthcare.

Trump didn't hire Pruitt to drain the swamp, but to turn actual swamps toxic with environmental poisons. He's doing a bang-up job, and there's precious little we can do to stop him.

MAKE YOUR CALLS to your representatives and senators all the same, to register your disapproval of Pruitt and his dangerous policies.

Open Wide...

What Love Looks Like, Sometimes

Yesterday, the actors Channing Tatum and Jenna Dewan announced they were separating after nearly nine years of being married. They each posted a very thoughtful message from the pair about their split, in which they wrote, in part:

We have lovingly chosen to separate as a couple. We fell deeply in love so many years ago and have had a magical journey together. Absolutely nothing has changed about how much we love one another, but love is a beautiful adventure that is taking us on different paths for now. There are no secrets nor salacious events at the root of our decision — just two best-friends realizing it's time to take some space and help each other live the most joyous, fulfilled lives as possible. We are still a family and will always be loving dedicated parents to Everly.
Naturally, because of our culture distressingly encourages strangers to become invested in celebrity's relationships, loads of people immediately took to social media to express their dismay, with many of them declaring that Dewan's and Tatum's split means love is dead.


Other people merely expressed their shock at the split, which itself is an interesting commentary on how we feel both privy and entitled to the inner workings of public figures' relationships. Or, really, others' relationships, whether famous or not.

I was married once upon a time to a lovely guy who was a great friend. We divorced for a number of reasons, but they mostly boiled down to this: We never should have been married in the first place. We'd mistaken a wonderful friendship and a charming affair for something bigger — and a divorce was really just our way of setting things right again.

We seemed like a happy couple, and, in some ways, we were. So when we divorced, it was "shocking" to some of our friends and family. Well. The creeping feeling that you aren't suited to love another person that way for the rest of your life isn't something that one easily articulates to oneself, no less shares with people who are inclined, quite understandably, to say, "What the fuck are you thinking? Your marriage is great."

But the truth of a marriage lies between two people alone (or any long-term partnership, between whatever number of people) — and parts of what holds it together, or tears it apart, reside secretly in individual hearts, bindings or fissures that are unknowable, or indescribable, even to the person in whom they reside.

No one knows everything about any relationship, even the people in them. Which is what makes loving another person terrifying, and what makes it exhilarating.

The very thing that makes love precious also makes it a breathing thing, with ebbs and crescendos and, sometimes, an end — which may mean that love taking a different shape, like friendship. Its mutable nature, its lack of any guarantee, means that love doesn't always last forever, looking like it once did — which is seemingly what happened to the love Channing Tatum and Jenna Dewan had for one another.

If their separation becomes a divorce, it will be described in many quarters as a "failed marriage," which will really be too bad, given their own description of its end.

I do not describe my first marriage, which lasted only half the time as theirs, as a "failed marriage." The failure would have been to stay, to hold on and hang in and obstinately stay, to honor some idea of love that actually didn't exist between us. It was just a marriage. No qualifications required.

Letting go can be an act of love, too.

And perhaps if we had a cultural narrative about marriage — or any kind of partnership — that also honored the relationships which end in letting go, the love stories that are journeys with destinations other than death, perhaps we would be less inclined to view two people taking steps in different directions, after some time together, as failures, and instead view them as people who know how to do love right.

My ex and I have been divorced since 2001. We still keep in touch; both of us are in different, more fulfilling careers than when we were together, and both of us are in lasting relationships with people who love us immensely, in ways we could never quite love one another. That's a successful outcome. We "failed" into contentment.

This summer, Iain and I will celebrate our 16th anniversary. I hope we will celebrate many more. I want, right now, to be with him for the rest of my life — and he wants the same. But if that ever changes, for either of us, I hope our love stays very much alive, to see us through to whatever future will greet us.

My best wishes for Jenna Dewan and Channing Tatum.

Open Wide...

The U.S. President Continues His War on the Free Press

Donald Trump has been waging a war on the press since virtually the moment he announced his candidacy in July 2015.

In the first year of his campaign, Trump made "incredible personal attacks on members of the press, openly mocking disabled reporter Serge Kovaleski; saying Fox debate moderator Megyn Kelly had 'blood coming out of her wherever'; ginning up outrage against the press at campaign events; and launching an all-out jeremiad against the media during a press conference, during which he called the press 'sleazy' and 'unbelievably dishonest.'"

He defended his campaign manager Corey Lewandowski, who was accused of physically assaulting a female reporter, in addition to having allegedly "pushing a CNN reporter who tried to ask the candidate a question; physically confronting an aide for a rival campaign in a post-debate spin room; publicly shouting threats over the phone at a restaurant; making sexual comments about female journalists; and calling up women in the campaign press corps late at night to make unwanted romantic advances."

Further, Trump blocked news organizations from his campaign events, revoking the press credentials of established institutions like the Washington Post, because he didn't like their coverage.

This was all before he started screaming "Fake news!" and elevating his war on the press to dangerous levels, as part of a demonstrable pattern Aphra Behn comprehensively documented.

The press is not above criticism. But Donald Trump's war on the free press is not "criticism." It is a sustained campaign to discredit reputable media institutions; to elevate propagandists; to intimidate individual reporters; to silence critics; and to make himself the arbiter of what constitutes "the truth."

This is a chapter right out of the authoritarian's playbook.

And he continued his assault on the press this morning, with a pair of tweets reading:

1. "The Fake News Networks, those that knowingly have a sick and biased AGENDA, are worried about the competition and quality of Sinclair Broadcast. The 'Fakers' at CNN, NBC, ABC & CBS have done so much dishonest reporting that they should only be allowed to get awards for fiction!"

2. "Check out the fact that you can't get a job at ratings challenged @CNN unless you state that you are totally anti-Trump? Little Jeff Zuker [sic], whose job is in jeopardy, is not having much fun lately. They should clean up and strengthen CNN and get back to honest reporting!"

These follow on the heels of another tweet yesterday in which he also attacked the free press in defense of Sinclar Media: "So funny to watch Fake News Networks, among the most dishonest groups of people I have ever dealt with, criticize Sinclair Broadcasting for being biased. Sinclair is far superior to CNN and even more Fake NBC, which is a total joke."

Trump's defense of Sinclair Broadcast Group — an influential (anti-)media company which essentially functions as a propaganda outfit for the Trump administration, per a deal struck by Jared Kushner — came on the heels of Deadspin video editor Timothy Burke compiling a striking video showing dozens of local anchors across the nation being forced to read a script issued by Sinclair about "the troubling trend of irresponsible, one sided news stories plaguing our country."


[Transcript of Sinclair script being read available at Deadspin.]

So, Trump spent his morning defending his propaganda arm and attacking the free press, despite the fact that the political media continues broadly to broadcast empty podiums awaiting Trump's presence and failing to even identify Trump's authoritarianism for what it is — and note well that his attacks are designed to make sure they continue to fail in precisely the same way.

Meanwhile, he simultaneously continues to wage a very singular war on Amazon, ostensibly because Amazon is bad for other U.S. businesses, but in reality because Amazon's owner Jeff Bezos also owns the Washington Post.

Trump is reportedly "discussing ways to escalate his Twitter attacks on Amazon to further damage the company." According to Vanity Fair's Gabriel Sherman, one source told him that Trump is "off the hook on this. It's war." And another source told him: "He gets obsessed with something, and now he's obsessed with Bezos. Trump is like, how can I fuck with him?"

That is wildly unethical, to put it mildly.

And my question at this point remains: Why does a significant portion of the political press continue to indulge, abet, and enable Trump in so many ways, when he has naught but contempt for them? Even the usual explanation of "profit$" doesn't make any sense, given that Trump has now repeatedly signaled he will try to fuck with the earning potential of any media company — or affiliated brand, e.g. Amazon — that he doesn't like. And he often succeeds, having driven down Amazon's shares by 5 percent yesterday.

I'm afraid the explanation is far more chilling: The disproportionately white, male, conservative political media has, in large part, no desire to impede Trump's authoritarian bid nor hold truly hold him accountable. No matter how hard he comes for them.

Which means he is even more unlikely to halt his assault on what remnants of a free press remain.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

Hosted by a turquoise sofa. Have a seat and chat.

Open Wide...

Open Thread + Programming Note

image of a purple sofa

Hosted by a purple sofa. Have a seat and chat.

I've got a doctor's appointment and some other things I need to do today, so I am taking the day off and I will see you back here tomorrow!

Open Wide...

The Virtual Pub Is Open

image of a pub Photoshopped to be named 'The Beloved Community Pub'
[Explanations: lol your fat. pathetic anger bread. hey your gay.]

Belly up to the bar,
and be in this space together.

Open Wide...

Friday Links!

This list o' links brought to you by action figures.

Recommended Reading:

Margaret Andersen at Wired: How Feminists in China Are Using Emoji to Avoid Censorship

Yessenia Funes at Earther: This Badass Woman Explores the Deep Sea to Help Us Save It

Monica Roberts at TransGriot: Run Danielle Run! Another Texas Trans Person Is Running for Office

Kenrya Rankin at Colorlines: That Time April D. Ryan Asked Why Trump Has No Comment on Police Killing Black People

Jazzi Johnson at the Grio: [Content Note: Racist and disablist slurs] Michigan State University Student Apologizes for Insensitive Tweets That Angered Campus

Rubab Zaidi at Media Diversified: Cake, a Pakistani Film Challenging Conservative Norms

Mary von Aue at Inverse: The Scientific Reason Why Knuckles Crack Is Not What You'd Expect

Leave your links and recommendations in comments. Self-promotion welcome and encouraged!

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Dudley the Greyhound in close-up, lying on the sofa, his looooong snout resting on a white blanket
Rough life at our house for a retired racer, lol.

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 435

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Earlier today by me: On Roseanne and People Are Shocked, Confused That Trump Occasionally Agrees to Look Like He Cares About Russian Aggression.

Here are some more things in the news today...

Daniel Dale at the Toronto Star: Minute by Minute at Donald Trump's Rambling Ohio 'Infrastructure' Speech. "He had a lot to say. And most of it was false, strange, outlandish, or confusing. The speech, to Ohio workers, was supposed to be about infrastructure, but we know by now that Trump's supposed infrastructure events are almost never actually about infrastructure. As usual, he meandered freely — to make dramatic statements about the Middle East and the Koreas, to disparage Hillary Clinton, to declare his ignorance of what a community college is, and, eventually, to express excitement about the ratings of the sitcom Roseanne. Here's what happened..." A must-read.

John Light at TPM: Trial Run for a Purge? "Yesterday morning, we published a scoop by Alice Ollstein: Congressional Democrats, she reported, are demanding an investigation into Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke's order last summer to reassign dozens of top-level DOI career employees. His choice of who to reassign, Democrats allege, may have been racially discriminatory, in addition to being politically motivated. Government investigators are also currently looking into whether these reassignments may have broken laws protecting civil servants. ...If investigators uphold Zinke's decision to reassign and marginalize DOI employees, one whistleblower told her, it could give the green light for a government-wide purge. 'The concern is that if you let this one fly, they won't hold back,' Joel Clement, a DOI climate scientist who was reassigned to the accounting office, told Alice."

Stephanie Kirchgaessner at the Guardian: FBI Questions Ted Malloch, Trump Campaign Figure and Farage Ally.
A controversial London-based academic with close ties to Nigel Farage has been detained by the FBI upon arrival in the U.S. and issued a subpoena to testify before Robert Mueller, the special counsel who is investigating possible collusion between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin.

Ted Malloch, an American touted last year as a possible candidate to serve as U.S. ambassador to the E.U., said he was interrogated by the FBI at Boston's Logan airport on Wednesday following a flight from London and questioned about his involvement in the Trump campaign.

In a statement sent to the Guardian, Malloch, who described himself as a policy wonk and defender of Trump, said the FBI also asked him about his relationship with Roger Stone, the Republican strategist, and whether he had ever visited the Ecuadorian embassy in London, where the Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has resided for nearly six years.

In a detailed statement about the experience, which he described as bewildering and intimidating at times, Malloch said the federal agents who stopped him and separated him from his wife "seemed to know everything about me" and warned him that lying to the FBI was a felony. In the statement Malloch denied having any Russia contacts.

...News of Malloch's detention by the FBI and subpoena was first reported by the far-right conspiracy theory website InfoWars after the controversial contributor Jerome Corsi said an alarmed Malloch had called him during the FBI interview.
Imagine being a person who is detained by the FBI and questioned about possible collusion with Russia, and the first person you call is a dipshit who works for Infowars. Good grief.

Jeremy Kahn at Bloomberg: Cambridge Analytica Affiliate Gave John Bolton Facebook Data, Documents Indicate. "A British company at the heart of the Facebook Inc. data-privacy scandal agreed to give a political action committee founded by John Bolton, [Donald] Trump's newly appointed national security adviser, data harvested from millions of Facebook users, documents released by Parliament show." So, the new National Security Advisor may have conspired illegally to influence the outcome of the election. Cool.

Ryan Mac, Charlie Warzel, and Alex Kantrowitz at BuzzFeed: Growth at Any Cost: Top Facebook Executive Defended Data Collection in 2016 Memo — and Warned That Facebook Could Get People Killed.
On June 18, 2016, one of Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg's most trusted lieutenants circulated an extraordinary memo weighing the costs of the company's relentless quest for growth.

"We connect people. Period. That's why all the work we do in growth is justified. All the questionable contact importing practices. All the subtle language that helps people stay searchable by friends. All of the work we do to bring more communication in. The work we will likely have to do in China some day. All of it," VP Andrew 'Boz' Bosworth wrote.

"So we connect more people," he wrote in another section of the memo. "That can be bad if they make it negative. Maybe it costs someone a life by exposing someone to bullies."

"Maybe someone dies in a terrorist attack coordinated on our tools."

The explosive internal memo is titled "The Ugly," and has not been previously circulated outside the Silicon Valley social media giant.

The Bosworth memo reveals the extent to which Facebook's leadership understood the physical and social risks the platform's products carried — even as the company downplayed those risks in public.
Fucking hell.

* * *

[Content Note: Nativism] Tal Kopan at CNN: U.S. to Require Would-Be Immigrants to Turn over Social Media Handles. "The Trump administration plans to require immigrants applying to come to the United States to submit five years of social media history, it announced Thursday, setting up a potential scouring of their Twitter and Facebook histories. ...According to notices submitted by the State Department on Thursday, set for formal publication on Friday, the government plans to require nearly all visa applicants to the U.S. to submit five years of social media handles for specific platforms identified by the government — and with an option to list handles for other platforms not explicitly required. The administration expects the move to affect nearly 15 million would-be immigrants to the United States, according to the documents."

If you're thinking, "This is fucking terrible — but haven't I heard this before?" you are correct! Back in June of last year, I covered the proposal of this policy. At the time, there was an enormous amount of pushback from civil rights groups, but now, nearly a year later, the administration is moving ahead with the plan, and today's announcement includes the disclosure of a 60-day public comment period.


So, basically: They proposed the rule last year, let everyone get super pissed about it, and now are quietly opening the 60-day comment period, while hopefully no one is looking.

Comments can be sent to PRA_BurdenComments@state.gov.

* * *


Ian Millhiser at ThinkProgress: The Chief Justice of the United States Has No Clue How Elections Work. "The Chief Justice of the United States is allergic to political science. He harbors numerous misconceptions about how voters behave and how they think. And these misconceptions often form the basis for his judicial decisions. With Chief Justice John Roberts poised to become the Supreme Court's crucial 'swing vote' if any of the five justices to his left leave Court, these misconceptions could soon weave themselves into the way the court interprets the Constitution. The laws governing America's elections — our right to choose our own leaders, rather than having them chosen for us — could soon bend to one man's weak understanding of how elections work."

[CN: War on agency] Teddy Wilson at Rewire: Kentucky Republicans Ignore Court Decisions, Ban Common Abortion Procedure. "The Kentucky legislature on Tuesday gave final approval for a ban on the most common type of second trimester abortion care, as similar laws have been blocked by federal and state courts. ...HB 454, sponsored by Rep. Addia Wuchner (R-Florence), prohibits a physician from performing an abortion procedure known as dilation and evacuation (D and E), the most common method of performing second-trimester abortions. The provisions were based on copycat legislation drafted by the National Right to Life Committee, an anti-choice organization that has lobbied GOP lawmakers in eight states to pass similar bills."

Natasha Geiling at ThinkProgress: Trump Administration Determined to Move Ahead with Arctic Drilling. "On Thursday, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) officially began soliciting comments from the oil and gas industry for areas of the Beaufort Sea that might be open to lease late next year, following the release of the administration's finalized offshore plan. But environmental and conservation groups warn that the call for potential lease areas is premature, since the administration hasn't even released its final five-year proposal. Soliciting industry advice on what areas are of interest, they contend, proves that the administration has a predetermined outcome for the Arctic Ocean."

* * *

And finally, I am tired.


What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...