This F#@king Guy

Donald Trump just held a joint presser with Swedish Prime Minister Stefan Löfven, and it went about as well as you'd expect, with Trump bragging about how terrific he's doing as president and claiming that Russia didn't meddle in the 2016 election and asserting that his White House isn't having any problem hiring staff.

And, naturally, with a European leader standing right beside him, he whined about how unfair Europe is to the United States:

The European Union has not treated us well, and it's been a very, very unfair trade situation. I'm here to protect — and one of the reasons I was elected is I'm protecting our workers; I'm protecting our companies. And I'm not gonna let that happen. So we're doing tariffs on steel — we cannot lose our steel industry; it's a fraction of what it once was. And we can't lose our aluminum industry, also a fraction of what it once was. And our country's doing well. The massive tax cuts and all of the deregulation has really kicked us into gear. But I have to work on trade deals. We're working on NAFTA right now.
By way of reminder, Trump used Chinese steel for his 2008 Trump International Hotel project in Vegas.


For his part, Löfven managed not to laugh in nor punch Trump's face, in a remarkable act of restraint, and instead merely commented: "Increased tariffs will hurt all of us in the long run."

Indeed they will.

Open Wide...

image of thumbs up & thumbs down Shaker Thumbs

Shaker Thumbs is your opportunity to give a thumbs-up or thumbs-down to a product or service you have used and that you'd recommend to other Shakers or warn them away from.

Today I'm giving a big thumbs-up to this set of five silicone lids, for use in the microwave, oven, fridge, and/or freezer:

image of multicolored lids with icons indicating they are BPA free, reusable, microwave safe, oven safe, freezer safe, dishwasher safe, and FDA approved

I got my set from an Amazon vendor where the set is currently out of stock, but if you do a search for "Set of 5 Silicone Lids," you should get some options. I've seen them range in price from about $10 to $15. I purchased mine for $9.99.

Iain and I have been using them for two months now, and I adore them. We both use them any time we microwave anything; I decided to store them on top of the microwave, so it would be easy to form a habit, and that worked really well.

I've also used them in lieu of cling wrap when I need to refrigerate something in an open bowl, and they're terrific for that, too. They keep things at least as well as cling wrap, and maybe better.

We've got an old dishwasher that tends to leave anything silicone or plastic coated in white residue, so they're a hand-wash item in our house, but I tested them in the dishwasher just to see if they held up, and they sure did. The only place I haven't yet tried them is the oven.

They're pretty nifty, and if you're someone who has seen them and wondered if they'd be useful, I can tell you that they've been very useful at Shakes Manor. We've definitely gotten more than ten bucks use out of them already, just in two months.

Anyway! Give us your thumbs-up or thumbs-down in comments!

[Just to be abundantly clear, I am not affiliated in any way with Amazon, nor am I receiving any form of payment from them.]

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Zelda the Black and Tan Mutt sound asleep on the couch
Even the most alert watch dogs need a nap.

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 411

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Here are some things in the news today:

Earlier today by me: OMFG Trump Is Appallingly Ignorant and On Chaos.

Jill Colvin at the AP: Ex-Trump Aide Says He'll Likely Cooperate with Mueller. "A former Trump campaign aide spent much of Monday promising to defy a subpoena from special counsel Robert Mueller, even throwing down the challenge to 'arrest me,' then backed off his defiance by saying he would probably cooperate in the end. In an interview with The Associated Press, Sam Nunberg said he was angry over Mueller's request to have him appear in front of a grand jury and turn over thousands of emails and other communications with other ex-officials, among them his mentor Roger Stone. But he predicted that, in the end, he'd find a way to comply. 'I'm going to end up cooperating with them,' he said."

Huh. So Nunberg's "meltdown" yesterday was all an act? You don't say. (I did say.)

Meanwhile...


I know there will be fully a million jokes about this because what do you even expect it's Trump blah blah fart, but that is, quite literally, a perfect example of how deeply broken the federal government is.

And it's just the start.

* * *

[Content Note: War crimes] Kareem Shaheen at the Guardian: Russia Suspected of Using 'Dumb' Bombs to Shift Blame for Syria War Crimes. "The Russian air force has used unguided 'dumb' bombs in Syria, in what UN sources say could be an effort to shift responsibility for possible war crimes and civilian deaths to their ally, the Syrian regime of Bashar al-Assad. UN sources told the Guardian that Moscow's use of less accurate bombs, which are closer in their capability to the Syrian air force's weapons stockpiles, could be intended to make it more difficult for war crimes investigators to identify those responsible for civilian deaths from airstrikes in Syria. ...'There seems to be a concerted effort for very similar weaponry to be used [by the Syrian and Russian air forces],' said one UN official. 'Since the Syrian air force is using older planes with pilots untrained in smart weapons capabilities, they [Russia] would use less smart weapons capabilities. I suspect they want to use those weapons because it makes attribution more difficult.'"

Maybe if we still had a functional State Department and a president who wasn't a Russian puppet, the U.S. government would care about that.

And this:


* * *

E.A. Crunden at ThinkProgress: E.U. Moves to Slap U.S. Heartland with Tit-for-Tat Tariffs in Response to Trump. "The European Union is preparing retaliatory tit-for-tat tariffs on a number of well-known U.S. brands and products in response to [Donald] Trump's moves to impose tariffs on aluminum and steel imports from other countries. A list tallied by the European Commission indicates a 25 percent levy on multiple U.S. goods, Bloomberg reported Tuesday. The tariffs will impact upwards of 2.8 billion euros ($3.5 billion) in U.S. exports, including agricultural and steel products. Motorcycles and blue jeans are also among the items included. The range of goods listed will disproportionately hit parts of the United States with strong manufacturing centers, including the Rust Belt and larger Midwest and Appalachia regions."

Erica Werner and Damian Paletta at the Washington Post: 10 Years After Financial Crisis, Senate Prepares to Roll Back Banking Rules.
The Senate is preparing to scale back the sweeping banking regulations passed after the 2008 financial crisis, with more than a dozen Democrats ready to give Republicans the votes they need to weaken one of President Barack Obama's largest legislative achievements.

Congress's appetite for pulling back bank regulations shows the renewed clout of the financial sector in Washington, not just in the GOP but also among Democrats. Eight years after nearly every Senate Democrat backed a sweeping set of new rules for financial firms large and small, the party is now split, with moderates, several of them facing tough midterm election contests, working with the opposing party.

The core of the new bill exempts about two dozen financial companies with assets between $50 billion and $250 billion from the highest levels of scrutiny by the Federal Reserve, the nation's central bank. Supporters argue that the legislation would bring much-needed relief to midsize and regional banks that were treated like their much larger counterparts under the 2010 legislation known as Dodd-Frank. Opponents say it would weaken the oversight needed to stave off the type of dangerous lending and investing that brought the U.S. economy to its knees.

The Senate is slated to take an initial procedural vote this week to move the measure forward, and if it eventually becomes law, it would be the most substantial weakening of Dodd-Frank since it was passed.
Fucking hell. The bill seeks to: Relax mortgage regulations for small banks; issue broad exemptions from oversight for regional banks with up to $250 billion in assets; create a mandate that the Fed tailor its rules for big banks; and give many of the nation's largest lenders easier capital and liquidity requirements. ALL OF THESE THINGS ARE TERRIBLE IDEAS.

For example... Jesse Hamilton at Bloomberg: Volcker Rule to Undergo 'Material Changes,' Fed's Quarles Says. "Federal Reserve Vice Chairman Randal Quarles says U.S. financial regulators are working quickly to make 'material changes' to the Volcker Rule, one of Wall Street's most hated post-crisis restrictions. ...The measure named for former Fed Chairman Paul Volcker was included in the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act as a way to reduce risk-taking by banning banks from trading with their own money. It has been a top target of Trump administration plans to dial back financial regulations as a way to spur economic growth." Which is bullshit. It will only spur more exorbitant bonuses for banking executives.

Hamilton Nolan at Splinter: Hey, Here's an Extremely Bad Idea. "Thankfully, the Republican party has heard the people's collective cry: Please deregulate the big banks! And now, the party of the Blue Collar Billionaire is set to roll back banking regulations that were put in place after the financial crisis of 2008, to try to make it less likely to have another crisis. For example, for several years, banks have been required to hold a certain amount of capital that can be easily liquidated during a crisis, so that they can continue to fund themselves during times of peril, so they don't blow up and require an enormous public bailout. Let's get rid of that! People hate that! We demand that banks instead be able to own riskier assets like municipal bonds, that will increase their profits but will also be more likely to cause another crisis!"

Zachary Warmbrodt at Politico: Warren Slams Senators for Backing Bank Deregulation Bill. "Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) on Tuesday blasted Republicans and fellow Democrats for backing a sweeping rollback of banking regulations that the Senate will likely pass as soon as this week. ...She said Democrats and Republicans were backing the legislation because of years of sustained bank lobbying in the wake of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act, the landmark law that strengthened banking oversight in the wake of the Wall Street meltdown. 'The people in Congress may have forgotten the crash 10 years ago, but I guarantee that people across this country have not forgotten the pain that these giant banks caused, and they do not want to see Congress move toward deregulating these banks,' she said."

And all of this is getting far less attention that it needs and deserves, because Sam Nunberg "freaked out" on teevee yesterday and Trump tweeted about chaos this morning, so most of the political press is fixated on that instead of the Senate fixing to create another major financial crisis for the American people so that bank execs can take home even more money.

* * *

Eugene Robinson at the Washington Post: The Trump Presidency Could Cost the Nation More Than We Realize.
As the saying goes, you don't miss the water until the well runs dry: This deeply aberrant presidency threatens to cost the nation much more than even some of [Donald] Trump's harshest critics may realize.

From 1988 to 1992, I was The Post's correspondent in Buenos Aires, covering all of South America. It was a time when countries such as Argentina, Brazil, Peru, and Chile — emerging from years of authoritarian rule — were struggling to reestablish democratic norms, and I learned one important lesson: It's easy to lose the habits and values of democracy, but incredibly hard to get them back.

Perhaps most difficult is to recover lost faith in the rule of law. That is why Trump's very public desire to use the legal system as a weapon against his political opponents is so damaging. "Lock her up" is more than a call to imprison Hillary Clinton. It is, potentially, a tragic epitaph for the consensus view of our legal system as a disinterested finder of fact and dispenser of justice.
This is, of course, a point I have made many times, and why I continually grouse about the necessity of urgency with regard to Special Counsel Bob Mueller's investigation. The longer the Republicans have to consolidate power behind Trump, the less incentive they'll have to do anything with Mueller's eventual report but flush it down the toilet. (And that's presuming his findings even include actionable items on Trump, which is no certain thing.)

We're quickly approaching a threshold past which none of Mueller's recommendations will matter, because the Republicans won't feel beholden to the public at all.

If Mueller doesn't make something happen before then, and it doesn't have to be the final piece of the investigation, but it has to be the first piece of accountability, we will have lost. That has to come while there's still some reasonable expectation that the Democrats, the press, and a public majority combined can put pressure on the GOP to take action.

The fact that we know it would take the combined influence of the Democrats, the press, and a public majority is an indication of how close we are already to losing any chance to hold this administration accountable.

And with every step closer we get to that threshold at which the GOP doesn't have to care even about that combined advocacy, the erosion of trust continues and becomes ever more difficult to recover.

* * *

Monique Judge at the Root: Trump Is 'Unstable, Inept, Inexperienced, and...Unethical': Former CIA Director. "Deadline's Nicolle Wallace asked Brennan what keeps him up at night or wakes him up with a start in the middle of the night, and he said, 'It is no secret to anybody that Donald Trump was ill-prepared and inexperienced in terms of dealing with matters that a head of state needs to deal with. I think this is now coming to roost..." Brennan said that our country 'needs confidence' that we will be able to deal with both Russia and North Korea, but 'if we have somebody in the Oval Office who is unstable, inept, inexperienced, and also unethical, we really have rough waters ahead.'" Welp.

Caitlin MacNeal at TPM: George W. Bush Quips That Trump Makes Him 'Look Pretty Good'. "Former President George W. Bush has reportedly found the silver lining in Donald Trump's presidency. Bush has been overheard remarking that Trump's run in the White House is going poorly and makes him look good as a result, the National Journal's contributing editor Tom DeFrank reported on Monday. 'Sorta makes me look pretty good, doesn't it?' Bush often says of Trump's presidency, according to the National Journal." 1. That's really saying something, since Bush was a fucking vile disaster. 2. I'm really getting sick of this asshole pretending like the Trump presidency would have ever happened if his own presidency hadn't paved the way for it.

Kira Lerner and Joshua Eaton at ThinkProgress: Kansas Secretary of State Seeks to Deliver a Devastating Blow to Voting Rights. "Kansas began to require documentary proof of citizenship from all Kansas residents when they register to vote in 2011, though courts have since blocked that law. The state passed the requirement after Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach (R) took office and began pushing for laws he claimed would protect against the threat of non-citizens casting ballots. ...Since 2011, Arizona, Alabama, and Georgia have all passed proof of citizenship laws similar to the one Kobach wrote in Kansas. Courts have blocked all three states' laws. Now the Kansas law could meet a similar fate. ...Starting Tuesday, Kobach will have to defend his law in a federal courtroom, as the ACLU attempts to prove that it is unconstitutional. Over about a week, the ACLU will question Kansas voters in court over the discriminatory effects of the law. Kobach, who is representing himself, will call as one of his witnesses a researcher whose work has been discredited time and time again."


[CN: Nativism] Alfonso Serrano at Colorlines: Immigrant Rights Group Sues ICE for Illegally Jailing 18-Year-Olds. "An immigrant advocacy group filed a class action lawsuit on Monday (March 5) against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on behalf of immigrant teenagers who arrived in the United States alone and were subsequently detained in ICE centers after turning 18. Federal law states that when unaccompanied migrant children in custody of the Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Refugee Resettlement turn 18, ICE must 'consider placement in the least restrictive setting available after taking into account the [individual's] danger to self, danger to the community, and risk of flight.' The suit, filed by the National Immigrant Justice Center, argues that ICE routinely fails to comply with that federal measure and systematically jails teens in adult prisons."

And finally... Bonnie Malkin at the Guardian: China's Tiangong-1 Space Station Will Crash to Earth Within Weeks. "China's first space station is expected to come crashing down to Earth within weeks, but scientists have not been able to predict where the 8.5-tonne module will hit. The US-funded Aerospace Corporation estimates Tiangong-1 will re-enter the atmosphere during the first week of April, give or take a week. The European Space Agency says the module will come down between 24 March and 19 April. In 2016 China admitted it had lost control of Tiangong-1 and would be unable to perform a controlled re-entry. The statement from Aerospace said there was 'a chance that a small amount of debris' from the module will survive re-entry and hit the Earth. ...Aerospace warned that the space station might be carrying a highly toxic and corrosive fuel called hydrazine on board." But don't worry — you are more likely to win the lottery than get hit by debris. So buy a lottery ticket and good luck!

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

TV Corner: Everything Sucks! (and I Don't Care About McQuaid)

In the final scene of Pitch Perfect, do you want to know how many times the camera cuts away from the nine women performing on stage to Beca's (Anna Kendrick) on-again, off-boyfriend, Jesse (Skylar Astin), who is watching in the audience?

Seven.

Seven times.

In what is supposed to be a moment of triumph for the Bellas as they perform their winning routine, in a span of less than four minutes, somebody made the decision to give us seven shots of Jesse's silent, emotional progression from disinterested pouting, to slow realization that a song was a reference to himself, and finally to a victorious, happy raised fist.

Jesse watching. Always watching.
I watch Pitch Perfect at least once per year and, during this scene, my wife somehow tolerates me yelling at the television, "I don't care, I don't care, I DON'T CARE about Jesse's boner!"

It's not just that I think the Beca/Jesse relationship is superfluous (which it is), it's that Jesse himself is superfluous to the major theme running through the Pitch Perfect series. Via competition in a capella, the women in the Bellas come to understand the power of using their authentic voices. This theme of women-finding-themselves is subverted when the camera continually cuts away from the women, just as they've found their voices, and onto a man's reactions. It is unnecessary coddling of the male viewer who will only watch women's stories if the stories are somehow really about a male character's inner landscape.

With this intro, we come to one of the final scenes of Netflix original, 1990's nostalgia/coming-of-age series, Everything Sucks!

(The rest of this post contains spoilers for this series)

Now, I should preface this critique by saying the following. First, I thought the performance of Kate (Peyton Kennedy) as a nerdy lesbian teenager in 1996 was pretty great, as was the decision to make her one of the two main protagonists. Secondly, I also understand that the portrayal of Luke (Jahi Di'Allo Winston), a biracial boy, as the other protagonist might be meaningful to a lot of people (even if the show takes a subtle "I don't even see race" perspective where Luke and his mom's Blackness is never mentioned by anyone in this apparently predominately-white Oregon town).

Lastly, I tend to like nostalgia series, even as I notice (what I view as) their imperfections. As I watched Everything Sucks!, for instance, I had to chuckle at the clothes. Why did we wear such big jeans, flannels, and sweaters in the 1990s? How did we function with dial-up Internet that bumped you offline anytime someone called your landline? How many other queer girls had coming-of-age moments in the queer-adjacent spaces of Tori Amos, Ani DiFranco, and Indigo Girls concerts?

Season One has led Kate and Emaline (Sydney Sweeney) to an important moment in the finale. Over the course of the season, Kate has realized she's a lesbian and has developed a crush on Emaline. Because we are less privy to Emaline's interior, we aren't 100% sure what she's feeling but she seems to go from disliking to being intrigued by to developing a crush on Kate.

These events culminate with Emaline leading Kate back to the empty auditorium, where they begin slow-dancing together, on stage. As a queer viewer who came of age in the 1990s, I couldn't stop thinking of the many things that could go wrong here. Somebody could walk in! It could be a trap! Oliver could come back at any time! Was he back already, in fact, hiding in the wings?!

Yet, magically, everything actually seemed okay. It could all turn to shit later, sure, but in that scene, Emaline pressed play on the boom box and started to dance just dorkily enough to suggest that she (kind of awkwardly) actually reciprocated Kate's crush on her. As they danced together, it was sweet. It was also a moment that very few queer kids likely got to experience in the 1990s.

But then, enter male nerd, McQuaid (Rio Mangini), who has an unrequited crush on Emaline.

Immediately after Kate and Emaline share their first kiss, the camera perspective widens and we see McQuaid storm into the auditorium. The camera then focuses on him watching the girls, while his face is fixed in agony over being confronted with the reality that Emaline is kissing someone else. After several seconds, he goes into the hallway, and we go with him, and he slumps back against a locker as if in visceral pain.

So, in what should be a triumphant moment for Kate, Emaline, and their respective self-discoveries, we are instead left watching a tangential heterosexual male nerd experience angst about what he has just watched the female characters do. We are implicitly invited to empathize with McQuaid.

It is a profoundly befuddling choice, although not surprising. It's said that "women watch themselves being looked at," but it's more than that. Time and time again, we watch male characters slowly, painfully realize that women and girls are beings with our own agency and desires. And, we watch men get very upset about this.

Ironically, we are given almost no backstory or insight into McQuaid. He's a flat stereotype but we're just supposed to feel for him, because um?

We do know that he's part of a slightly-misogynistic male nerd trio of Luke, Tyler (Quinn Liebling), and himself. For instance, the trio initially talk as though girls are not human beings with agency, but a series of achievements to unlock in a video game. McQuaid has somehow calculated all of their odds of leaving high school as virgins (how? with what statistics?) and the progression seems to be: get a girlfriend, have a first kiss, have sex. Which girls these activities might occur with seems much less important, at least initially, than the fact that these activities occur.

Earlier in the season, Luke quickly develops a crush on Kate and it gets complicated fast. Kate tells him she thinks she's a lesbian and they stay in a fake relationship anyway, for the sake of appearances, because what could go wrong. Yet, to Luke's credit, in addition to earning some lesbian bona fides by going to a Tori Amos concert with his lesbian "girlfriend" in 1996, he gradually comes to appreciate that Kate has an interior of her own and that her lesbianism doesn't have anything to do with him. (He then directs a movie in which lesbians are aliens from outer space and this is supposed to be a big character development moment for him, but I have questions).

Yet, we see no development for McQuaid. In fact, what little we do know about him aside from being in the nerd trio, is that for the two episodes leading up to the season finale, he starts lusting after Emaline.

It's not that McQuaid's lust for Emmaline is bad, per se. It's more that we've been given so little reason to care about his lust. Also, as infatuated as TV/filmmakers are with the "socially-awkward male nerd who lusts after a girl" character type, new spins or reboots on this type are rarely done, let alone done well.

The nerd genre has long had a tidy "every male nerd deserves a girl in the end" entitlement, Stranger Things included, and it's difficult not to see that here. When this entitlement is shown in the context of two queer girls kissing, the suggestion seems to be that this guy's hetero angst, a representation that's a dime a dozen in the nerd genre, was more profound than the angst of being a queer girl in 1996 when kids were trying to find out what the hell we were by sneaking peaks at clinical textbooks in the school library.

The big take-away from the bizarre pivot to McQuaid, because we know so little about him other than his lust for Emaline, is that the mere existence of male lust is thought as of "enough" to make us give a shit about a male character over the main female character. To de-center queer girls in a coming of age show in favor of re-centering male heterosexuality, quite frankly sucks. Female and queer characters deserve better.

Open Wide...

On Chaos

Open Wide...

OMFG Trump Is Appallingly Ignorant

This is hardly surprising, of course, but it is nonetheless a frightening outrage:

When [Donald] Trump said North Korea "called up a couple of days ago" saying they were interested in talking with the United States, the president was actually referring to a phone call with South Korean President Moon Jae-in, a White House official told Yonhap.

"[Donald] Trump did not have a call with the North Koreans," the official said.

The conversation between Trump and Moon occurred on March 1, and the two leaders "noted their firm position that any dialogue with North Korea must be conducted with the explicit and unwavering goal of complete, verifiable, and irreversible denuclearization," the official added.
There is certainly a part of me that would like to write just imagine what the Republicans' and the political press' response would have been if President Barack Obama had thought he was speaking to Kim Jong-un when he was really speaking to President Moon Jae-in, but President Obama never would have made that mistake.

Not in a million years.

Nor would Hillary Clinton have made such an ignorant, embarrassing, appalling mistake.

The bar for Trump is set so low, however, that it's barely a blip on the radar. He hasn't reset the standards of what we expect of a United States President; he's obliterated the existence of standards altogether.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

Hosted by a turquoise sofa. Have a seat and chat.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Suggested by Shaker KaterTot: "Black or green olives? Kalamata? Capistrano? Garlic-stuffed? Just olive oil?"

I am not a fan of olives. I can eat them, if I must, but I really try to avoid them. That said, I love olive oil. Go figure!

Open Wide...

Monday Links!

This list o' links brought to you by emery boards.

Recommended Reading:

Nicole Chung at Longreads: How to Write a Memoir While Grieving

Damon Young at Very Smart Brothas: Confession: I Write for a Living, but I Don't Actually Know How to Pronounce Any Words

Sarah Kendzior at Her Eponymous Site: "The Mafia White House": My No-Holds-Barred Interview on The Rick Smith Show

Derek Owusu at Media Diversified: Foster Families Who Ignore Race Are Participating in a Pernicious Form of Racism

Ari Phillips at Earther: The Bee(tle)s Are Dying at an Alarming Rate

Gabe Bergado at Teen Vogue: Awkwafina's Young Hollywood 2018 Interview on Ocean's 8 and Asian Stereotypes

Sameer Rao at Colorlines: Ava DuVernay Discusses Her Stepfather's Deep, Unexpected Influence on A Wrinkle in Time

Amanda Parris at CBC Arts: 5 Things You Should Probably Know About Amandla Stenberg

Mia Galuppo at the Hollywood Reporter: Viola Davis, Lupita Nyong'o to Play Mother and Daughter in The Woman King

Rae Paoletta at Inverse: Why Cats Purr, According to Science

Leave your links and recommendations in comments. Self-promotion welcome and encouraged!

Open Wide...

#365feministselfie: Week 9

I am again participating in the #365feministselfie project, now entering its fifth year, and promised a thread for others to share selfies and/or talk about the project, visibility generally, self-apprecation, and related topics. So here is a thread for Week 9!

A few of my selfies over the last two weeks:

image of me in a mirror, wearing dark blue jeans, a dark blue and black patterened blouse, a black jacket, and a black stone necklace, and carrying a dark blue purse
Off to see Black Panther!

image of me at my desk, wearing a black tank-top and brown glasses frames
Working.

image of me in a brightly striped dress sitting in the car
Looking foxy AF on my way to therapy!

image of me in a dentist's chair wearing protective eyewear; my mouth is starting to slack from novocaine
At the dentist, my mouth starting to slack from novocaine.

image of me in my living room, wearing a colorful sweater and smiling; in the background, Zelda the Black and Tan Mutt is curled up in a blue chair
Me 'n a Zelly dog!

Please feel welcome and encouraged to share your own selfies in comments, or share your thoughts on the project, or solicit encouragement or advice, or do whatever else feels best for you to participate, if you are inclined to do so!

Open Wide...

Grand Jury Subpoena Was for Sam Nunberg

Earlier today, I mentioned that Special Counsel Bob Mueller had subpoenaed all communications between a Grand Jury witness and a list of people that didn't include Vice President Mike Pence. At the time, we didn't know who had been the person at the center of the subpoena, but now we do: It was former Trump aide Sam Nunberg.

Josh Dawsey at the Washington Post reports:

Former Trump aide Sam Nunberg said Monday that he has been subpoenaed to appear in front of a federal grand jury investigating Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential election but that he will refuse to go.

In an interview with The Washington Post, Nunberg said he was asked to come to Washington to appear before the grand jury on Friday. He also provided a copy of what appears to be his two-page grand jury subpoena seeking documents related to [Donald] Trump and nine other people, including emails, correspondence, invoices, telephone logs, calendars, and "records of any kind."

...Nunberg said he does not plan to comply with the subpoena, including either providing testimony or documents.

"Let him arrest me," Nunberg said. "Mr. Mueller should understand I am not going in on Friday."
Nunberg then did a remarkable interview with Katy Tur, during which he again insisted Mueller could shove it. (I'm paraphrasing.)


Let me just be blunt here: If there's anyone I think would be at the center of a Stone ratfucking, it's Nunberg. And I absolutely think that Stone is trying to orchestrate a ratfucking. It's what he does.

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Olivia the White Farm Cat lying under the dining room table in the sunshine, yawning
Olivia takes a break from napping in the sunshine for a big yawn.

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 410

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Here are some things in the news today:

Earlier today by me: Oh My Aching Sides and "They're trying to take down the whole intelligence community! And they're using me as the battering ram to do it."


It kind of feels like that tweet could just serve as the entirety of the contents for this thread today — and every day — but here is some of today's kindling...

Nicole Lafond at TPM: State Dept. Hasn't Spent $120 Million Designated for Blocking Russia Meddling.
The State Department has not yet spent any of the $120 million that was to be allocated toward combating foreign interference in elections, the New York Times reported Sunday.

Toward the end of former President Barack Obama's administration, Congress voted to direct the Pentagon to give the State Department $60 million for combatting Russian and Chinese "anti-democratic propaganda," according to the Times. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson took nearly seven months to decide what to do with the funding and the Pentagon ultimately decided to keep it. The Department had another $60 million available for the next fiscal year, but decided last week to only take $40 million, the Times reported.

That money will reportedly be transferred to the State Department and its Global Engagement Center in April, which will counter Russian meddling efforts with anti-propaganda counter-attacks. Currently, the Global Engagement Center doesn't have someone who speaks Russian on the team and it is primarily focused on countering jihadist and other forms of extreme propaganda, according to the Times.
Emphases mine. So, just to recap: The State Department has $120 million earmarked to address foreign election meddling but has spent $0 on it, and no one on the team speaks Russian. Cool.

Richard C. Paddock at the New York Times: Escort Says Audio Recordings Prove Russian Meddling in U.S. Election. "A Belarusian escort with close ties to a powerful Russian oligarch said from behind bars in Bangkok on Monday that she had more than 16 hours of audio recordings that could help shed light on Russian meddling in United States elections. The escort, Anastasia Vashukevich, said she would hand over the recordings if the United States granted her asylum. She faces criminal charges and deportation to Belarus after coming under suspicion of working in Thailand without a visa at a sex-training seminar in the city of Pattaya. Ms. Vashukevich, who described herself as close to the Russian aluminum tycoon Oleg V. Deripaska [who has close ties to Vladimir Putin and Paul Manafort], said that audio recordings she made in August 2016 included discussions he had about the United States presidential election with people she declined to identify."

She wants asylum, but who is going to give it to her with the Republicans in charge? Not only is it not going to happen because the information she asserts to have would be damaging to Donald Trump, but no Republican is going to want to grant asylum to anyone in the midst of their nativist campaign.

In other Mueller news...


* * *


Katherine Sullivan at ProPublica: The Trump Organization Ordered Golf Course Markers with the Presidential Seal; That May Be Illegal. "In recent weeks, the Trump Organization has ordered the manufacture of new tee markers for golf courses that are emblazoned with the seal of the President of the United States. Under federal law, the seal's use is permitted only for official government business. Misuse can be a crime. ...A law governs the manufacture or use of the seal, its likeness, 'or any facsimile thereof' for anything other than official U.S. government business. It can be a criminal offense punishable by up to six months in prison. ...The 'law is an expression of the idea that the government and government authority should not be used for private purpose,' said Kathleen Clark, a law professor at Washington University specializing in government and legal ethics said. 'It would be a misuse of government authority.'"


Judd Legum and Addy Baird at ThinkProgress: This Is What an Insider Trading Expert Thinks About Carl Icahn's Stock Dump. "One of the nation's leading experts in insider trading, James D. Cox, believes that Carl Icahn's sale of more than 1 million shares of a steel-related stock just days before [Donald] Trump announced plans to impose steep tariffs on steel imports was 'awfully suspicious' and 'unquestionably' warrants a federal investigation. ...Cox told ThinkProgress that Icahn could have violated insider trading law if he had a conversation with Trump or someone else at the White House, even if that conversation stopped short of revealing a definite plan or intention to impose steel tariffs."

After Ichan dumped nearly 1 million shares of Manitowoc Company Inc., "Manitowoc stock, along with other steel-dependent companies, plunged. The stock is down nearly 9 percent in the two trading days since Trump's announcement." So this fuckery has cost other investors money. Which is precisely why insider trading is illegal.

[Content Note: Racism] Anne Branigin at the Root: Trump, the Walking Internet Comments Section, Taps Racist Blogger for Federal Job. "William Otis, a former special counsel to President George H.W. Bush and a current professor at Georgetown University Law Center, was nominated by [Donald] Trump this week to sit on a federal commission that sets policy on how to punish criminals. It would come as no surprise that Otis is a staunch supporter of Attorney General Jeff Sessions' hard-line approach of imposing mandatory minimum sentences and resurrecting the war on drugs. But Otis, thanks to his popular legal blog, Crime and Consequences, has also made his racist beliefs both explicit and easily searchable. As the Washington Post reports, Otis once defended a federal judge who was called out for saying that black and Latinx people were more violent than white people."


* * *

[CN: Police brutality, sexual assault, and other misconduct] Kendall Taggart and Mike Hayes at BuzzFeed: Secret NYPD Files: Officers Can Lie and Brutally Beat People — and Still Keep Their Jobs. "Secret files obtained by BuzzFeed News reveal that from 2011 to 2015 at least 319 New York Police Department employees who committed offenses serious enough to merit firing were allowed to keep their jobs. Many of the officers lied, cheated, stole, or assaulted New York City residents. At least fifty employees lied on official reports, under oath, or during an internal affairs investigation. Thirty-eight were found guilty by a police tribunal of excessive force, getting into a fight, or firing their gun unnecessarily. Fifty-seven were guilty of driving under the influence. Seventy-one were guilty of ticket-fixing. One officer, Jarrett Dill, threatened to kill someone. Another, Roberson Tunis, sexually harassed and inappropriately touched a fellow officer. Some were guilty of lesser offenses, like mouthing off to a supervisor. ...In every instance, the police commissioner, who has final authority in disciplinary decisions, assigned these officers to 'dismissal probation,' a penalty with few practical consequences."

[CN: Rape culture; child abuse] Esther Yu Hsi Ye at ThinkProgress: Kentucky Senate Pulls Bill to Outlaw Child Marriage Following Opposition by Conservative Group. "Senate Republicans in the state legislature pulled a bill to outlaw child marriage in Kentucky, Insider Louisville reported this week, following opposition from the conservative group Family Foundation of Kentucky on claims that it takes away parental rights. Introduced by State Sen. Julie Raque Adams (R) to the State Senate Judiciary Committee, Senate Bill 48 would set the minimum age of marriage to 17 years old, and establish a process for 17-year-olds to marry with a court approval. ...State Sen. John Schickel (R) had issues with the bill, stating, 'Decisions involving a minor child should be made by a parent, not the court.'"

[CN: Rape culture; child abuse] Adi Robertson at the Verge: Facebook Says Asking Users About Condoning Pedophilia 'Was a Mistake'. "Facebook has apologized for a survey that asked users for their opinion on allowing pedophiles to solicit sexual pictures from children on the platform. ...Alongside questions about topics like violent extremism, it asked how users would handle 'a private message in which an adult man asks a 14-year-old girl for sexual pictures.' One possible answer was 'this content should be allowed on Facebook, and I would not mind seeing it.' Facebook VP of product Guy Rosen tweeted an apology for the question, saying it 'shouldn't have been part of this survey.'" Oh.

*gazes at dumpster fire with tears in eyes*

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

"They're trying to take down the whole intelligence community! And they're using me as the battering ram to do it."

This New Yorker piece by Jane Mayer is a must-read: "Christopher Steele, the Man Behind the Trump Dossier." It's long, so settle in, because it's an important piece of journalism.

There is so much information in the piece worthy of discussion, but two quick things I want to highlight:

1. The fact that Republican Senators Lindsey Graham and Charles Grassley "referred Steele's name to the Department of Justice, for a possible criminal investigation, despite the fact that it was "merely a political stunt," is an absolutely appalling way to treat a person who was offering his expert assistance to the United States.

Their behavior makes it much less likely that even freelance (and/or mercenary) intelligence operatives will share information with U.S. intelligence now, which is pretty significant, especially when Donald Trump's indiscretion has made foreign governments less inclined to share intel with the U.S.

Being alone and in the dark is not the place where functional and uncompromised intelligence services want to be. It is not where a population should want any part of their government to be. To be floating in an intelligence vacuum is incredibly dangerous.

2. This passage (emphasis mine):

Steele talked at length with Mueller's investigators in September. It isn't known what they discussed, but, given the seriousness with which Steele views the subject, those who know him suspect that he shared many of his sources, and much else, with the Mueller team.

One subject that Steele is believed to have discussed with Mueller's investigators is a memo that he wrote in late November, 2016, after his contract with Fusion had ended. This memo, which did not surface publicly with the others, is shorter than the rest, and is based on one source, described as "a senior Russian official."

The official said that he was merely relaying talk circulating in the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, but what he'd heard was astonishing: people were saying that the Kremlin had intervened to block Trump's initial choice for Secretary of State, Mitt Romney. (During Romney's run for the White House in 2012, he was notably hawkish on Russia, calling it the single greatest threat to the U.S.) The memo said that the Kremlin, through unspecified channels, had asked Trump to appoint someone who would be prepared to lift Ukraine-related sanctions, and who would cooperate on security issues of interest to Russia, such as the conflict in Syria. If what the source heard was true, then a foreign power was exercising pivotal influence over U.S. foreign policy — and an incoming President.

As fantastical as the memo sounds, subsequent events could be said to support it. In a humiliating public spectacle, Trump dangled the post before Romney until early December, then rejected him.

There are plenty of domestic political reasons that Trump may have turned against Romney. Trump loyalists, for instance, noted Romney's public opposition to Trump during the campaign. Roger Stone, the longtime Trump aide, has suggested that Trump was vengefully tormenting Romney, and had never seriously considered him. (Romney declined to comment. The White House said that he was never a first choice for the role and declined to comment about any communications that the Trump team may have had with Russia on the subject.)

In any case, on December 13, 2016, Trump gave Rex Tillerson, the C.E.O. of ExxonMobil, the job. The choice was a surprise to most, and a happy one in Moscow, because Tillerson's business ties with the Kremlin were long-standing and warm. (In 2011, he brokered a historic partnership between ExxonMobil and Rosneft.) After the election, Congress imposed additional sanctions on Russia, in retaliation for its interference, but Trump and Tillerson have resisted enacting them.
That particular example of security issues of interest to Russia — "such as the conflict in Syria" — is very interesting to me, given what I've previously detailed with regard to the campaigns of every one of Hillary Clinton's general election opponents and the campaign of her major primary opponent inexplicably advocating that the U.S. ally with Russia to defeat ISIS in Syria.

Additionally: It was bad enough when it seemed as though Trump entertained Romney as a Secretary of State candidate only to then dismiss him because Trump is a petty, vengeful shit. That he may have reversed course because Putin gave Romney a thumbs-down is even worse.

By orders of magnitude.

Open Wide...

Oh My Aching Sides

This weekend was the loathsome Gridiron Dinner, which you may recall was the site of the time President Obama joked about how Hillary Clinton was too passionate about global democracy. Cough.

The Gridiron Dinner is a depressingly antiquated boys' club garbage fest, and this year was even worse than usual, because the White House is also a depressingly antiquated boys' club garbage fest.

Donald Trump told a bunch of hilarious jokes, and by "hilarious jokes" of course I mean disgorged bigotry disguised as humor.

[Content Note: Homophobia; disablism; sexism; misogynoir. Video may autoplay at link.]

The Hill has a complete transcript of Trump's Gridiron yuk-yuks. Naturally, he made a homophobic joke while talking about Mike Pence:

[In preparation] I also spoke to some of the funniest people around the White House starting with my number two, Mike Pence. ...Love you Mike. ...Some of you may think that Mike is not a comedian, but he is one of the best straight men you're ever going to meet. ...He is straight!
And of course he had some sexist, disablist, racist humor for Reps. Nancy Pelosi and Maxine Waters:
We had 'Drain the Swamp'; we had 'Lock Her Up'; we had 'Build the Wall.' Build the wall! Nancy Pelosi has been trying to come up with a line that's equal. And her line that she announced last week is, 'Mow the Grass!' It doesn't work. ...Mow the frickin' grass. ...That's going to stop MS-13. ...Mow that frickin' grass!

...Man, she's crazy, but she's a fine woman. She is. I actually like Nancy Pelosi. Can you believe that? Her and Maxine Waters. How about that one? Maxine Waters, 'He must be impeached!' That's all she knows how to say, 'He must be impeached!' Impeached! ...But he's done nothing wrong. Doesn't matter, they say. What has he done wrong? 'I don't know! You got to be impeached!' ...And then I say — I get in trouble for this — 'She has to immediately take an IQ test.' And people go crazy. They went crazy! But Maxine and Nancy and these people, there's a lot of hatred.
Oh is there? There's a lot of hatred among Maxine Waters, a Black Congresswoman you just said needs to take an IQ test, and Nancy Pelosi, the first female Speaker of the House you just said is crazy, and their supporters? Huh. I wonder why there's so much hatred there, Donzo. Quite a fucking mystery!

[CN: Fat hatred] And in case Trump's insults against Waters and Pelosi at the Gridiron weren't enough for you, Trump's BFF Rudy Giuliani spoke at Trump's Mar-a-Lago fundraiser the night before, where he went after Hillary Clinton with a fat joke:
The most shocking moment of the evening came when Trump brought his old pal Rudy Giuliani onto the stage.

Giuliani told the crowd he had been down there for Trump's wedding.

"Hillary was also here," he said, according to two sources in the room, "and she actually fit through the door."

The crowd gasped. I'm told Giuliani's wife gave him a "most foul look." Trump later told the audience: "I'm just glad I didn't say it."
The punchline of all of these jokes is basically: We hate powerful women.

Noted. Repeatedly.

Open Wide...

The Oscars Thread

image of Frances McDormand onstage during her Oscar acceptance speech
Best Actress: Frances McDormand

[Content Note: Misogynist violence]

I didn't watch the Oscars last night, because I was annoyed that Gary Oldman, who has been accused of domestic violence by his ex-wife, and Kobe Bryant, who has been accused of rape, were even nominated, and I didn't want to see them win, and of course both of them did. As did Guillermo del Toro, who has publicly supported and defended Roman Polanski.

#TimesUp or whatever, amiright?

Anyway. Variety has the complete list of winners. I am glad that Jordan Peele won Best Original Screenplay, because I liked Get Out and I like him.

I like all the actors besides Oldman who won acting awards, but I'm annoyed that it was another all-white-winners year in the acting categories.

The only acceptance speech I watched today was Frances McDormand's, because I knew she'd have something interesting to say, and indeed she did, standing on the stage with no (or very little) makeup and her fancy gown, calling on all the nominated women in the room to stand up and then saying, "Look around, everybody. Look around, ladies and gentlemen, because we all have stories to tell and projects we need financed. Don't talk to us about it at the parties tonight. Invite us into your office in a couple days, or you can come to ours, whichever suits you best, and we'll tell you all about them. I have two words to leave with you tonight. Ladies and gentlemen: inclusion rider."


That's all I got. Did you watch? What did you think?

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of a purple sofa

Hosted by a purple sofa. Have a seat and chat.

Open Wide...

The Virtual Pub Is Open

image of a pub Photoshopped to be named 'The Beloved Community Pub'
[Explanations: lol your fat. pathetic anger bread. hey your gay.]

Belly up to the bar,
and be in this space together.

Open Wide...

Blog Note

I'm taking the day off today. I've got another doctor's appointment today — actually a second dentist's appointment, to be precise, and, owing to my extreme dental phobia, the anxiety leading up to each visit and the subsequent adrenaline crash following each visit just makes it excruciating for me to try to write, and I don't want to put myself through that for a second time this week.

So, I'll be away today, and I will see you back here on Monday. Thank you in advance for understanding.

Open Wide...