We Resist: Day 356

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Here are some things in the news today:

Earlier today by me: Deadly Mudslides in Southern California; DACA: The Good News and the Bad News; and U.S. President Calls for End of Democracy.

I'm going to start with some good resistance news today!

The United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations: U.S. Senator Ben Cardin Releases Report Detailing Two Decades of Putin's Attacks on Democracy, Calling for Policy Changes to Counter Kremlin Thread Ahead of 2018, 2020 Elections.
A Senate Foreign Relations Committee Democratic staff report [pdf] released Wednesday and commissioned by U.S. Senator Ben Cardin (D-Md.), the Committee's ranking member, details Russian president Vladimir Putin's nearly two decades-long assault on democratic institutions, universal values, and the rule of law across Europe and in his own country. The report comes one year after Senator Cardin introduced the Counteracting Russian Hostilities Act of 2017, which served as the basis for the sanctions package signed into law last August, and makes a series of recommendations to adequately bolster U.S. and European defenses and counter the growing Kremlin threat to democratic institutions.

"Putin's Asymmetrical Assault on Democracy in Russia and Europe: Implications for U.S. National Security," finds that [Donald] Trump's refusal to publicly acknowledge the threat posed by the Russian government has hampered efforts to mobilize our government, strengthen our institutions, and work with our European allies to counter Putin's interference in democracies abroad.

Never before in American history has so clear a threat to national security been so clearly ignored by a U.S. president, and without a strong U.S. response, institutions and elections here and throughout Europe will remain vulnerable to the Kremlin’s aggressive and sophisticated malign influence operations.

"As the extent of Russia's obvious meddling in the 2016 U.S. election continues to be investigated, it is imperative that the American people better understand the true scope and scale of Putin's pattern of undermining democracy in Russia and across Europe. That is why I commissioned this report shortly after the 2016 election," Senator Cardin said. "This threat existed long before [Donald] Trump took office, and unless he takes action now, it will continue long after his administration. While [Donald] Trump stands practically idle, Mr. Putin continues to refine his asymmetric arsenal and look for future opportunities to disrupt governance and erode support for the democratic and international institutions that the United States and Europe have built over the last 70 years."

"[Donald] Trump must be clear-eyed about the Russian threat, take action to strengthen our government's response and our institutions, and — as have other presidents in times of crisis — mobilize our country and work with an international coalition to counter the threat and assert our values," Cardin continued.

Across eight chapters and several appendices, the report meticulously details the tools the Russian government has repeatedly deployed from its asymmetric arsenal, and how the Kremlin has learned and perfected its techniques attacking democracy both internally and abroad. Such tools — drawn largely from a Soviet-era playbook, but updated with new technologies — include military incursions, cyberattacks, disinformation, support for fringe political groups, and the weaponization of energy resources, organized crime, and corruption.
There is much more at the link. Announcing the release of the report, Senator Cardin tweeted:


Thank you, Senator Cardin and the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Democratic staff. This is critically important work in defense of this nation.

In other good resistance news...

Anne Blythe at the News & Observer: North Carolina Congressional Districts Struck Down as Unconstitutional Partisan Gerrymanders. "A panel of federal judges struck down North Carolina's election districts for U.S. Congress on Tuesday as unconstitutional partisan gerrymanders and gave lawmakers until Jan. 29 to bring them new maps to correct the problem. ...'We're enormously gratified on behalf of our clients and all voters in North Carolina that no one will have to endure another congressional election under an unconstitutional map,' said Allison Riggs, senior voting rights attorney for the Southern Coalition for Social Justice, which represented some of the challengers. 'The court was clear in demanding a real remedy before the 2018 elections, and we expect the General Assembly to respect that order.'"

Antonia Blumberg at the Huffington Post: Female Democrats Plan to Wear Black to Trump's State of the Union Address. "A group of female Democratic lawmakers is reportedly planning to wear black to [Donald] Trump's first State of the Union address, in solidarity with movements protesting sexual harassment and assault in numerous industries. NBC News first reported the lawmakers' plan on Twitter, and Rep. Jackie Speier (D-Calif.) confirmed to HuffPost that she was planning to take part in the action. 'This is a culture change that is sweeping the country, and Congress is embracing it,' Speier, who launched #MeTooCongress in response to a social media movement against sexual harassment, told HuffPost on Tuesday."

Zack Ford at ThinkProgress: This Court Just Issued a Sweeping LGBTQ Victory for the Western Hemisphere. "The Inter-American Court of Human Rights issued a sweeping decision Tuesday ordering the legal recognition of same-sex families and transgender individuals that could impact as many as 20 countries across Central and South America. The decision was a response to an inquiry from Costa Rica, which has already acknowledged it will comply with the ruling. ...The ruling explains that the word 'family' has evolved, and a family can include those with different genders and sexual orientations. Because the Convention protects all people's fundamental rights, states should extend the same protections to those families as they do other families, including the rights of marriage." 🏳️‍🌈

* * *

And now for the shitty news...

Julian Borger at the Guardian: U.S. to Loosen Nuclear Weapons Constraints and Develop More 'Usable' Warheads. "The Trump administration plans to loosen constraints on the use of nuclear weapons and develop a new low-yield nuclear warhead for U.S. Trident missiles, according to a former official who has seen the most recent draft of a policy review. ...The new nuclear policy is significantly more hawkish that the posture adopted by the Obama administration, which sought to reduce the role of nuclear weapons in U.S. defence. Arms control advocates have voiced alarm at the new proposal to make smaller, more 'usable' nuclear weapons, arguing it makes a nuclear war more likely, especially in view of what they see as Donald Trump's volatility and readiness to brandish the U.S. arsenal in showdowns with the nation's adversaries. The NPR also expands the circumstances in which the U.S. might use its nuclear arsenal, to include a response to a non-nuclear attack that caused mass casualties, or was aimed at critical infrastructure or nuclear command and control sites."

Everything is fine. (Everything is not fine.)

Spencer Ackerman at the Daily Beast: White House Official Floated Withdrawing U.S. Forces to Please Putin. "A senior National Security Council official proposed withdrawing some U.S. military forces from Eastern Europe as an overture to Vladimir Putin during the early days of the Trump presidency, according to two former administration officials. While the proposal was ultimately not adopted, it is the first known case of senior aides to Donald Trump seeking to reposition U.S. military forces to please Putin — something that smelled, to a colleague, like a return on Russia's election-time investment in [Donald] Trump. The White House did not immediately respond to The Daily Beast's request for comment." I'll bet they didn't.

Liz Sly at the Washington Post: Who Is Attacking Russia's Bases in Syria? A New Mystery Emerges in the War. "A series of mysterious attacks against the main Russian military base in Syria, including one conducted by a swarm of armed miniature drones, has exposed Russia's continued vulnerability in the country despite recent claims of victory by President Vladimir Putin. The attacks have also spurred a flurry of questions over who may be responsible for what amounts to the biggest military challenge yet to Russia's role in Syria [and] about the sustainability of Russia's gains in Syria, said Jennifer Cafarella of the Washington-based Institute for the Study of War. In December, Putin visited the Hmeimim base and said Russia would start to wind its presence down because the war in Syria is essentially over." Hmm.

* * *


The entire Republican agenda at this point is just straight-up unfathomable malice. It has been for quite some time, of course, but it has never been quite this brazen.

Josh Gerstein at Politico: White House Plans to Destroy Trump Election Fraud Commission's Voter Data. "The White House intends to destroy voter data collected by the election fraud commission [Donald Trump] recently shut down, the Justice Department said in a court filing Tuesday night. White House Director of Information Technology Charles Herndon said in a declaration submitted to a federal court in Washington that officials plan to erase the information, rather than transfer it to the Department of Homeland Security or the National Archives and Records Administration."

I literally just don't believe this. At all. And I have no way of assessing the truth, ever. Because this administration is as resistant to public accountability as it is inclined to lie. About everything.


[Content Note: Nativism] Alice Ollstein at TPM: Trump's Scattershot Immigration Remarks Leave Congress Reeling. "In a sprawling hour-long discussion with Democratic and Republican lawmakers, [Donald] Trump took a range of positions on negotiations over the fate of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program —
swinging wildly from demanding billions in funding for a border wall and other immigration restrictions in exchange for renewing DACA to endorsing Democrats' proposal for a 'clean' renewal and, later, a complete overhaul of the immigration system. ...With no agreement yet on whether a DACA deal will be a part of the Jan. 19 spending bill, what the exact status for the 800,000 impacted young immigrants would be, and what forms of 'border security' Trump is demanding, the mass confusion is raising the potential for a government shutdown."

This was the meeting at which Trump accidentally agreed to Senator Dianne Feinstein's suggestion that they compromise on a clean DACA bill (meaning just extend DACA without any other contingencies), because he didn't understand what she was talking about, as he is an incompetent wreck:


The United States president literally doesn't understand what "clean bill" means. And I know some readers may be thinking, "Well, I didn't know what that means, either," but you're not the president of a global superpower, so it's okay that you didn't know.

Meanwhile, in other Trump administration nativism news...


Fucking hell. This is absolutely chilling. I am so angry — and I am scared.

* * *

Jessica Taylor at NPR: Rep. Darrell Issa to Retire, Adding to Record GOP Exodus from Congress. "Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., announced he will not seek re-election Wednesday, adding to a record number of House Republicans heading for the exits ahead of the 2018 midterms — perhaps seeing the writing on the wall of a possible wave election for Democrats. There are now 31 Republicans who will not seek re-election in November: 19 who are retiring outright and another 12 who are running for higher office. And that list is is expected to grow in the coming weeks."

Yes, that might mean a "blue wave" come November (provided we still have anything resembling free and fair elections at that point). It could also mean that the Republican seats being vacated are filled with Republicans who are even worse than they are, who have zero ethical quandaries about abetting the reprehensible agenda of the Trump administration.

[CN: Video may autoplay at link] Jeff Zeleny, Kevin Liptak, Dana Bash, and Dan Merica at CNN: Facing Staffing Exodus, Trump Struggles to Fill West Wing.
White House aides have been told to decide before the end of January whether they intend to leave the administration or stay through the November midterm elections, an official said, a deadline intended to help bring a sense of order to an anticipated staffing exodus.

[Donald] Trump is finding it difficult to recruit staff to fill the vacancies, several people close to the West Wing say, as he faces the second year of his administration with daunting political odds and an ongoing Russia investigation.

In recent months, top advisers on foreign and domestic policy have announced their departures. Additional aides are expected to make their exit in the coming weeks. Chief of staff John Kelly has embarked upon an effort to fill the ranks by the end of January. But the absence of willing and qualified replacements, paired with a lengthy hiring process, make it unlikely he'll reach that goal.
Naturally, as per usual, the White House is denouncing all of this as fake news blah blah fart, but more turnover is very likely, including at the highest levels. CNN notes: "Two of the most senior officials who are on the potential departure list are Don McGahn, the White House counsel, and HR McMaster, the national security adviser."

I don't guess I have to point out that, in addition to literally everything else, the lack of continuity in, for example, potentially having three different national security advisers in the space of a single year doesn't result in good governance of the nation.

* * *

[CN: Misogyny; sexual harassment and/or assault; rape culture. Covers entire section.]

E.A. Crunden at ThinkProgress: Michelle Williams Earned 1% of Male Co-Star's Salary to Re-Shoot Film. "Actor Mark Wahlberg was reportedly paid $1.5 million to reshoot his scenes for a film while co-star Michelle Williams was paid a per diem rate ultimately totaling less than $1,000. A number of Hollywood figures have declared that 'Time's Up' when it comes to misogyny — but the incident makes it clear the industry has a long way to go."


Jeremy Fuster at the Wrap: Russell Simmons Accused of Rape by Two More Women. "Two more women officially filed criminal complaints against Russell Simmons on Tuesday, bringing the total number of women accusing the Def Jam music mogul of sexual misconduct or assault to 14. According to TMZ, Sherri Hines, who accused Simmons of raping her at his office in 1983 in a televised interview with Megyn Kelly last month, is one of the two women who filed with the NYPD. The other woman, who chose to remain anonymous, claimed that Simmons raped her at his Manhattan residence after a date in 1991. NYPD is already investigating Simmons for at least seven claims of sexual misconduct."

Jordan Crucchiola at Vulture: New York Times Cancels James Franco Event After Accusations of Misconduct Surface. "As James Franco was accepting his Golden Globe on Sunday night for Best Actor in a Musical or Comedy, Twitter started buzzing with several women accusing him of sexual misconduct. Now, two days later, the New York Times has canceled a TimesTalk event with the actor. 'The event was intended to be a discussion of the making of the film, The Disaster Artist,' the Times said in a statement. 'Given the controversy surrounding recent allegations, we're no longer comfortable proceeding in that vein.'"

And finally, this interview with Michael Douglas by Mike Fleming Jr at Deadline is absolutely disgusting, for about a dozen different reasons, but I am fuming about this line in the intro, justifying its publication at all: "The accusation story will most likely follow elsewhere, but in this moment of 'she said, he said' trial by journalism, it was never specified whose version had to be first. So here, Douglas states his case." FUCK OFF. Seethe.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

U.S. President Calls for End of Democracy

I'm quite certain that, even a year into Donald Trump's democracy-hostile presidency, my headline sounds like hyperbole. I regret to say, however, it is not.

This morning, in response to Senator Dianne Feinstein's applaudable decision to publicly release the full transcript of Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson's testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee about the infamous "Trump dossier," Donald Trump first tweeted a deeply anti-Semitic (and misogynist) tweet about Feinstein.


Trump immediately followed that with a tweet proclaiming that "Republicans should finally take control!"


I don't know what to say that I haven't said a thousand times since Donald Trump first announced his presidential bid. He is a dangerous authoritarian who poses an existential threat to the republic. Here is the definitive proof, for anyone who is not inexplicably inclined to continue to pretend he is saying something other than what he is; that he could ever be something other than what he is.

Open Wide...

DACA: The Good News and the Bad News

The Good News: Zoe Tillman at BuzzFeed: A Federal Judge Just Ordered the Trump Administration to Partially Revive DACA.

A federal judge in San Francisco on Tuesday night ordered the Trump administration to partially revive the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, finding that challengers to the administration's decision to end the program were likely to succeed in their claims that [Donald] Trump's move was "arbitrary and capricious."

The Obama-era program, which Trump moved to end in September, had provided protection against deportation for nearly 800,000 young undocumented people brought to the country as children.

Under the order from US District Judge William Alsup, the Trump administration must resume accepting renewal applications from individuals who were already enrolled in the program. Alsup did not order the administration to accept new applications, however, writing that the plaintiffs had shown only that existing recipients were likely to suffer "irreparable harm" absent immediate intervention from the court.
In sum: The judge ordered that the Trump administration can't end DACA while a lawsuit is pending.

The Bad News: Trump responded to the ruling by once again attacking the judiciary.


And White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders was sent out, as usual, to turn the the president's authoritarian instincts into official administration policy:
White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders called the decision "outrageous" and insisted that Congress must ultimately decide the fate of the DACA program.

"An issue of this magnitude must go through the normal legislative process," Sanders said. "[Donald] Trump is committed to the rule of law, and will work with members of both parties to reach a permanent solution that corrects the unconstitutional actions taken by the last administration."
The unmitigated temerity of these vile clowns asserting that Trump "is committed to the rule of law" as he publicly undermines the authority of the courts.

Goddammit. I hate this administration. And I hate that this fight for DREAMers' safety is not even close to over yet.

Open Wide...

Deadly Mudslides in Southern California

[Content Note: Death; floods; wildfires.]

At least 15 people have been killed and dozen have been injured by mudslides along coastal hills in Southern California. Rescuers, which include crews from the Coast Guard and National Guard, expect that number to grow.

The mudslides have been unusually devastating because wildfires, exacerbated by climate change, have left the slopes "barren and unable to hold onto tons of soil and rocks dislodged by downpours." Fucking hell.

"The only words I can really think of to describe what it looked [like] was it looked like a World War I battlefield," said Santa Barbara County Sheriff Bill Brown at a news conference Tuesday afternoon. "It was literally a carpet of mud and debris everywhere."

The number of dead rose Wednesday to 15, said Amber Anderson, spokeswoman with the Santa Barbara County Incident Management Team. All bodies were recovered near Montecito, a coastal community north of Los Angeles, where mudflows carried houses off their foundations and rose waist-high. A storm of mud descended on the town with no warning, officials said, surrounding houses and carrying a washing machine down one block.

...A Santa Barbara County fire official, who declined to provide his name because he did not have authorization to speak with reporters, described a scene out of a disaster movie.

"Inside the debris we're finding bodies," he said.

"This whole mountain has been burned, and anytime water hits it's not shedding into any bushes because they're all burned. Any water that hits the surface is coming at us and causing debris and mud to flow," he said. "This is just the first storm. It's probably going to happen again and again."
Naturally, many homeowners will want to leave the area, but, unless the federal government provides for a relocation program, it's unlikely they'll be able to sell their homes, even if they remain in good condition, because who's going to buy them? And renters are in need of guaranteed affordable housing elsewhere, plus the moving costs they may not have following multiple evacuations.
Barbara Hill, 68, who said her house is right next to the affected areas, said the region's summers have become hotter and the droughts more severe.

"You know what they call the four seasons here?" she said. "Earthquake, drought, fire, and flood. We went quickly from fire to flood."

...Elizabeth Terry, who lives in a boardinghouse in Los Angeles, said it was her third evacuation since 2016, having been forced from her home by wildfires previously.

Huddled in an white blanket at a Red Cross evacuation center in the Sun Valley neighborhood, she said she's "had more than enough" of the natural disasters and wants to move, but she can't afford to.

"I've been trying now for over a year," said Terry, 63.
Devastating.

My condolences to those who have lost family, friends, or neighbors in the mudslides, and my sympathies to those who are still waiting to hear about loved ones, or who are themselves awaiting rescue. I am so sorry.

Please feel welcome and encouraged to share ways to help in comments. And, as always, let's keep this an image-free thread. Thanks.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of a red couch

Hosted by a red sofa. Have a seat and chat.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Suggested by Shaker IrishUp: "Have you ever come up with a portmanteau? What's your favorite?"

As you've no doubt noticed, I invent portmanteaus all the time, when there isn't an existing word that will do, lol. I have two favorites: Kyriarchetype, because it's so useful, and clusterfucktastrophe, because it's so evocative.

Open Wide...

An Observation

image of my desk, atop which are standing a fat unicorn lamp, a Hillary Clinton figurine, an Aughra figurine, and a deskplate reading 'WTF?'

If someone who didn't know me tried to guess what kind of person I am based exclusively on my desk things, they'd probably get pretty close. 😆

What could someone tell about you from your desk?

Open Wide...

Dianne Feinstein Wants You to Know the Truth

Earlier this afternoon, Senator Dianne Feinstein released the full transcript [pdf] of Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson's testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee.


This comes a week after Simpson and co-founder Peter Fritsch penned an op-ed for the New York Times urging Congress to make public their testimony about the infamous dossier on Donald Trump compiled while in their employ by former British spy Christopher Steele, against whom Republicans Chuck Grassley, chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Lindsey Graham issued a criminal referral, also last week.

Basically: Fusion GPS and the Democrats want the public to know the truth about who knew what about Trump's collusion with Russia when, and the Republicans want to conceal that information.


There is a lot in the testimony itself, as well as what the testimony reveals. Two things I want to highlight:

One.


Two.


There has already been a lot of speculation about who the whistleblower inside the Trump organization could be.

I know y'all will probably doubt my instinct here, but I suspect the FBI's source inside the Trump campaign might be Mike Pence.

My speculative theory is that Pence, once he came aboard the Trump campaign, immediately saw evidence of their poorly concealed collusion with Russia and knew they would not get away with it. He also, however, knew that if he quit the campaign, his presidential ambitions were dead in the water. (Remember, he was about to lose the governorship in Indiana.) But he knew if he stayed with the campaign, he could go down with the rest of the rats.

So he decided to play both hands: Be Trump's running mate, and be Trump's betrayer. Trump would win unscathed, and take Pence one step closer to the presidency, or Trump would win (or lose) and find himself in the middle of an investigation, and Pence would feed the feds what they needed and take himself one step closer to the presidency.

If it were Pence, that would explain why there has been absolutely no indication that Bob Mueller is investigating Pence, and why Pence doesn't get but a passing mention in Michael Wolff's book.

Pence is not a patriot. He's just wildly ambitious — and undiluted conniving evil.

A guy who would do anything to be president. Including being Trump's veep. And possibly his foil.

Anyway. There is much to discuss. Have at it in comments!

Open Wide...

Trump Comes for Documented Immigrants

As you may have noticed, I have spent the better part of a year warning that the Trump administration was signalling their intent to come after documented immigrants.

Naturally, I've been accused of alarmism, hyperbole, paranoia, and the usual chorus of insults, and once again I am left wishing that everyone who spent a second telling me to STFU had instead used that energy to resist this administration and its ugly nativist agenda.

Because here is where we are now: Tina Vasquez at Rewire reports on "Operation Janus," a joint operation by the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), which may revoke the citizenship of thousands of people, many of whom have been naturalized U.S. citizens for decades.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) announced Tuesday that it canceled a person's naturalization certificate, revoking his citizenship and reverting him to a lawful permanent resident. The move potentially makes him subject to deportation.

Baljinder Singh, also known as Davinder Singh, is the first casualty of "Operation Janus," a joint operation by the DOJ and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). It appears that because USCIS failed to use fingerprint records effectively, those who have been granted citizenship without proper fingerprint records, meaning before fingerprints were digitized, may now be subject to having their citizenship revoked.

...Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) claims to have identified nearly 150,000 older fingerprint records "of aliens with final deportation orders or who are criminals or fugitives" that have not been digitized. The FBI repository is missing records because "not all records taken during immigration encounters were forwarded to the FBI," DHS reported. The DOJ is investigating 315,000 cases in which people were granted citizenship without the proper fingerprint data available, and USCIS intends "to refer approximately an additional 1,600 for prosecution," the DOJ reported.

The DOJ is asserting, according to its Tuesday statement, that cases in which proper fingerprint data is missing may suggest that those affected by USCIS' oversight "sought to circumvent criminal record and other background checks in the naturalization process."

...DHS has warned that "as long as the older fingerprint records have not been digitized and included in the repositories, USCIS risks making naturalization decisions without complete information and, as a result, naturalizing additional individuals who may be ineligible for citizenship or who may be trying to obtain U.S. citizenship fraudulently."

Operation Janus does not bode well for the thousands of immigrants who have had to navigate the U.S.' complicated, lengthy, and costly immigration system.
I have a number of serious concerns about this, not least of which is that it seems to be setting a precedent in which mistakes made by the INS/DHS, resulting in noncompliance or inconsistencies, can subsequently be used to justify revoking people's citizenship.

And mistakes are, frankly, very common. Trust that a multitude of citizens have paperwork under multiple names, and not because they filed the paperwork that way.

Humans process immigration paperwork. At a high volume. Humans who make mistakes.

If human error is going to be ignored in order to suggest that any discrepancies are evidence of "individuals who may have tried to obtain U.S. citizenship fraudulently," a whole lot of people are going to be fucked.

Which, of course, is not a bug, but a feature.

[H/T to Eastsidekate.]

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Zelda the Black and Tan Mutt on the couch, looking alert
The Watch Dog watches.

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 355

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Here are some things in the news today:

Earlier today by me: There Is Something Wrong with the President.

[Content Note: Nativism and white supremacy. Covers entire section.]

Megan Janetsky at ThinkProgress: 'Should I Be Planning for the Worst?': Uncertainty Looms as DREAMers Fight for Justice.
After March 5, 2018, DACA permits will gradually begin to expire. Some estimate around 1,000 DACA recipients will begin losing their status per day.

...Since September, [Donald] Trump has punted the issue to Congress, calling on lawmakers to find a permanent solution on DACA by the March 5 deadline. He has used DACA to strike deals for ramping up immigration enforcement and border wall funding, as hundreds of thousands of Dreamers wait anxiously. [20-year-old Maria Socorro Leon Pena]'s once carefully laid plans of going to college to become a pediatrician has been thrust into uncertainty.

In December, it was that very uncertainty that prompted Pena to drive across the United States to D.C. with a group of DACA recipients and advocates to push for a solution.

"It just sucks to have the place where you grew up in, the place where all your dreams were born, and where you feel like you can have the opportunity to go to school, to work, to do the best that you can, but [to have] these laws and these policies are like, literally, 'No, you can't. You can't do that,'" Pena told ThinkProgress.
It's aggressively unfair. And, I know I'm the brokenest of broken records, but I just want to emphasize again that it is nigh impossible to make any kind of plan, no less contingency plans, when your immigration status is in flux. The process is costly, it's stressful, it's time-consuming, and it's without any definitive timeline. And that's the best-case scenario, when the president isn't a white supremacist, nativist, anti-immigrant bigot who is trying to make things even more difficult for you.

Seriously, just take a minute to really contemplate what it is like to have to try to plan for either going to college or moving to another country. Have funds for both, just in case. Make practical plans for both, just in case. Do all the necessary paperwork for both, just in case. Maintain relationships and plan for your future and make major life decisions not knowing which will happen.

It is an absurd and cruel position in which the Trump administration is putting immigrants. I am SO ANGRY. I hope you are angry, too.

Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, and Carrie Dann at NBC News: Trump and His Border Wall Remain Biggest Wild Cards in Immigration Fight. "As [Donald] Trump meets at the White House today with Democrats and Republicans to discuss immigration, it's possible to see how they could eventually reach a deal on the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program (or DACA) that the Trump administration rescinded last fall. The deal: Democrats, with leverage to use in the upcoming spending fight (because Republicans will need 60 votes to pass anything in the Senate), get to permanently protect the some 700,000 DACA recipients — in exchange for increases in border security and some changes in immigration law. And that COULD include funding for Trump's border wall or something approximating it."

Democrats have to give Nightmare Tantrum Bigot President-Boy his tall, beautiful wall if they want to save DREAMers from ruin. Terrific.

Meanwhile, about that wall... Ron Nixon at the New York Times: To Pay for Wall, Trump Would Cut Proven Border Security Measures. "The Trump administration would cut or delay funding for border surveillance, radar technology, patrol boats, and customs agents in its upcoming spending plan to curb illegal immigration — all proven security measures that officials and experts have said are more effective than building a wall along the Mexican border. ...[S]ecurity experts said the president's focus on a border wall ignores the constantly evolving nature of terrorism, immigration, and drug trafficking."

Grifters gonna grift, even if it's stealing for no purpose other than funding bullshit white nationalist fantasies.

Speaking of which... Tina Vasquez at Rewire: Trump Is 'Stealing' Benefits from Elderly Immigrants He's Expelling from the United States. "'I have worked every day in this country for 18 years, paying my taxes, paying into Social Security. Trump is taking away all we have, but this is what I want to know — this is what I want you to find out: What will happen to the benefits owed to us, the benefits we have been paying for? What happens to our money?' [asked Seventy-year-old Juan Yanez, a Temporary Protected Status recipient from El Salvador]. Little is known about the specific demographic makeup of the nearly 200,000 TPS recipients from El Salvador, but Yanez said many of his friends are like him: Elderly TPS recipients who are still working and have been paying taxes in the United States for decades. As they gear up for the possibility of mass deportations of TPS recipients, Yanez said he and his friends are having lots of conversations about being forced to return to their countries of origin, and whether or not they will be able to access the benefits owed to them."

This is straight-up theft. Trump is disgusting. His party is disgusting. They are ruthless thieves.

James Hohmann at the Washington Post: Trump Systematically Alienates the Latino Diaspora — from El Salvador to Puerto Rico and Mexico. "This is part of a strategic, full-court press to make America less hospitable to immigrants, both legal and illegal."

Yep. Me, last March: "This is also a message sent to people considering immigrating to the U.S. And that message is: Don't."

It took nearly a year for that idea to make it (in such clear language) to the pages of the Washington Post.

* * *

Yesterday afternoon, I tweeted this:


And that was before the president once again demonstrated that he's got about as much patriotism as a bag of turnips:


I just really don't want to hear about conservatives being more authentically "American" than progressives ever fucking again. It was tiresome even before this human shitshow was inaugurated and it's absolutely exhausting (and even more ludicrous) now.

* * *

[CN: Voter suppression] Tierney Sneed at TPM: Judge Orders Defunct Voter Fraud Panel to Clarify Whether DHS Is Getting Voter Data.
A question lingering for months about [Donald] Trump's now-defunct voter fraud commission and its cooperation with the Department of Homeland Security may now be answered, thanks to a judge's order in a lawsuit against the commission, which was disbanded last week.

With the announcement of the commission's dissolution, Trump, its vice chair Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach and the White House have suggested that the DHS would take over the commission's work, which included a controversial request for state voter roll information.

The ACLU of Florida — which was suing the commission and Florida for turning over its state voter roll data — pointed out the mixed messages it had received as to whether the DHS would have access to the data in a court filing on Friday.

The U.S. magistrate judge overseeing the case, Jonathan Goodman, demanded in a order Monday that the commission explain by Thursday where the data is being stored and whether it has been or will be transferred to the DHS.
GOOD.


In related voting law news... Kira Lerner at ThinkProgress: Supreme Court to Consider If Citizens Have the Right Not to Vote. "On Wednesday, [Ohio]'s purging policy will go before the U.S. Supreme Court when they hear arguments in Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute. Lawyers for Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted (R) will argue that the policy is necessary for voting list maintenance, while advocates for voters will say it violates the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA). States cannot deregister a voter 'by reason of the person's failure to vote,' they argue. ...Like the policy itself, the Supreme Court's decision is likely to fall along partisan lines. If the court allows the purging to continue, voting advocates say voting rights will be in serious jeopardy. 'It really seems like this is the direction that people who want to restrict voting are moving in,' Dale Ho, director of the ACLU's Voting Rights Project, told TPM. 'And this case, by potentially weakening the NVRA's restrictions on purging, could help with that effort.'"

* * *

Today in Authoritarianism Watch...


"Uh oh." — The Fairness Doctrine.

Juliet Eilperin at the Washington Post: Interior Puts Science Grants Through Political Review. "The Interior Department has adopted a new screening process for the discretionary grants it makes to outside groups, instructing staff to ensure those awards 'promote the priorities' of the Trump administration. The Dec. 28 directive, obtained by The Washington Post, represents the latest attempt by Trump political appointees to put their mark on government spending. Last summer, the Environmental Protection Agency instituted a system requiring that a political appointee in the public affairs office sign off on each grant before it is awarded. Scott J. Cameron, Interior's principal deputy assistant secretary for policy, management, and budget, instructed other assistant secretaries and bureau and office heads to submit most grants and cooperative agreements for approval by one of his aides."


Keep your eyes on Pence. Keep your eyes on Pence. Keep your eyes on Pence...

Adi Robertson at the Verge: Twitter Would Make Trump Remove Tweets If He Posted Someone's Private Address. "Twitter says that while it's committed to keeping 'elected world leaders' like [Donald] Trump on the service, there's at least one thing that could cross the line: tweets that reveal a private address or phone number. Bruce Daisley, Twitter's VP of Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, laid out the details in an interview with the BBC. 'If someone tweets private information — if someone tweets someone's private address, phone number — then there are no-go areas where we don't permit that,' he said. 'Were he to do that, just picking a hypothetical example, then those would be areas' that were grounds for discipline. But Daisley didn't say this would lead to a ban or suspension. 'We would caution him to remove that tweet for sure,' he said, when host Emma Barnett asked if that would get Trump suspended."

What an utterly ridiculous and wildly insufficient set of unique rules for perhaps the most powerful man on the planet.


FML.

* * *

[CN: Sexual harassment and assault. Covers entire section.]

Josephine Yurcaba at Rewire: For Survivors of Prison Rape, Saying 'Me Too' Isn't an Option. "The public seems to care less about the stories of incarcerated survivors than others, as Victoria Law has reported, and does not work as hard to end their abuse or the normalization of abuse in prisons. The result is a culture of sexual violence so extreme that speaking out could put prison abuse survivors in serious danger. The mainstream Me Too movement as cultural effort falls short for them. ...In order for the proper enforcement of [the Prison Rape Elimination Act] and for the condemnation of sexual abuse generally, a larger cultural shift is needed where people stop assuming that prisoners 'deserve' what they get while they're in prison."

This is a really big issue, about which I've written a number of times before: Trying to convince people, even people who are anti-rape in every other circumstance, they are wrong that rape is something incarcerated people deserve and/or that sexual violence in prisons is a useful deterrent, is incredibly difficult. I can't put my argument any plainer than this: The solution to abuse is never going to be more abuse.

Caitlin MacNeal at TPM: Ivanka Trump Praises Oprah's Golden Globes Speech and Times Up Movement. OMG this asshole right here.


What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

Dear Men: I Am Not a Character in Your Story

[Content Note: Misogyny.]

It happened again. I was doing laps in the pool when I noticed a man in the lane next to me start to time his laps to mine. I was pivoting too quickly at the end of each length for him to start a conversation, so he began loudly clearing his throat, inexplicably believing that listening to him gargle phlegm would capture my attention.

When none of his passive aggressive overtures worked, and kept not working for nearly 40 minutes, he took one of the floats he had piled up at the end of his lane — these guys always carry a collection of swimming accoutrements, for maximum attention — and carefully placed it at the end of my lane. As if it might have been accidentally swept into the pool there.

Of course, since I do the breaststroke, I saw all of this happen. I saw him pick up his kickboard; discard it; pick up and examine his resistance gloves; discard them; pick up the float; glance back at me; apparently determine my goggles are opaque; set the float in my lane; then begin fussing busily with his pile of stuff — far too occupied rearranging his gear to have noticed his float slip into my lane, obviously!

I reached the target, grabbed it, and tossed it into his lane. "Your float," I said. "Oh, I'm so sorry—" he began, turning toward me, as if this ridiculous ruse had succeeded as a conversation starter. "No problem," I said curtly, then dived back under the water, to continue the thing I wanted to do for myself.

image of me in the lane of a pool, swimming contentedly
I am the hero of my own story.

I didn't want to talk to him, not even to tell him off. What I wanted was to keep doing my laps, without interruption or the throat sounds of a stranger who doesn't understand that I am not a character in his story.

It's no wonder he is under the misapprehension that I am. He was, as were we all, socialized in a culture filled with stories in which women are merely characters, tokens, plot devices, objects of desire or scorn in the stories of men.

Even in many stories that are ostensibly women's stories, like romantic comedies supposedly designed so specifically for women that they are demeaned as "chick flicks," women frequently have no purpose but to love difficult men, to fix and support and heal them, to help them realize their true potential, to marry them and have their babies.

What we never talk about is how the damsel in distress only exists to rescue her rescuer, from a life of devoid of every (straight) man's true birthright: To be gazed upon as a hero by a grateful woman.

Men are the heroes of their own stories; any woman's role is to make him feel that way. The mother who raised him from boy to man, the sister he defended from harm, the lovers he beds, the witches he vanquishes.

When a man approaches a woman like a character in his story, we know if we don't play the role of lover, we will be cast in the role of witch.

What I want is the option to not be seen as a character in any man's story at all.

I want to be viewed as my own author, my own architect, my own captain, my own governor. I want to be seen as fully human, with agency and autonomy and the right of consent.

I want men to look at me, swimming in the pool with fierce determination, stretching my arms to reach farther and extending my legs to kick harder with every stroke, my brows knitted and breath measured, and see that I am not a supporting role in anyone else's story.

I am my own hero.

And then I want them to leave me the fuck alone, because it should be evident that I neither want nor need them in this chapter of my saga.

[Related Reading: Dear Men: You Don't Own Women.]

Open Wide...

This Is Really Neat

Look, my priority is still the discovery of another dimension to which I can escape forever, but this is still pretty cool, I guess.

Ryan F. Mandelbaum at Gizmodo: Two Experiments Show Fourth Spatial Dimension Effect.

To the best of our knowledge, we humans can only experience this world in three spatial dimensions (plus one time dimension): up and down, left and right, and forward and backward. But in two physics labs, scientists have found a way to represent a fourth spatial dimension.

This isn’t a fourth dimension that you can disappear into or anything like that. Instead, two teams of physicists engineered special two-dimensional setups, one with ultra-cold atoms and another with light particles. Both cases demonstrated different but complementary outcomes that looked the same as something called the "quantum Hall effect" occurring in four dimensions. These experiments could have important implications to fundamental science, or even allow engineers to access higher-dimension physics in our lower-dimension world.

"Physically, we don't have a 4D spatial system, but we can access 4D quantum Hall physics using this lower-dimensional system because the higher-dimensional system is coded in the complexity of the structure," Mikael Rechtsman, professor at Penn State University behind one of the papers, told Gizmodo. "Maybe we can come up with new physics in the higher dimension and then design devices that take advantage the higher-dimensional physics in lower dimensions."
There is much more at the link about the two experiments, which are super fascinating!

Open Wide...

There Is Something Wrong with the President

For reasons frustrating, inexplicable, and pathetic, the political press has decided only now, a year into Donald Trump's presidency, to have a conversation about his psychological fitness for the job — despite the fact that his grotesque temperament has been manifestly evident since the day he swaggered into the public eye.

And despite the fact that his opponent, Hillary Clinton, repeatedly warned that he was temperamentally unfit for the presidency, as did countless other people, especially women who have survived abuse, obliged by cruel men to become experts in its hallmarks. We knew who Trump is the moment we had the misfortune of laying eyes on him.

This long-delayed conversation is riddled with disablism — the substitution of mental illness or dementia as explanation where malice and indecency should be.

Maybe Trump is mentally ill, or taken by a degenerative disease like Alzheimer's or syphilis, which is exacerbating the more critical issue: That he is a terrible person, who is reckless and bigoted willfully ignorant and insecure and vainglorious and profoundly spoiled and catastrophically selfish and lazy as fuck.

That should be the center of this conversation: His personality flaws.

And a secondary conversation altogether ought to be had about why it is that meaningful discussion on this subject was delayed until after Trump was given the keys to the kingdom — and its nuclear codes.

But so it is and here we are. In today's Washington Post, Philip Rucker and Ashley Parker have written a piece bluntly headlined: "The White House Struggles to Silence Talk of Trump's Mental Fitness." They note that Trump himself didn't help his cause by tweeting that he is "like, really smart" and "a very stable genius."

"In doing so," they write, "the president underscored his administration's response strategy — by being forceful and combative — while also undermining it by gleefully entering a debate his aides have tried to avoid."

But his administration's strategy isn't doing him any favors, either. Rucker and Parker further report that, in an emailed statement, White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders proclaimed: "The White House perspective is outrage and disgust that people who do not know this President or understand the true depth of his intellectual capabilities would be so filled with hate they would resort to something so far outside the realm of reality or decency."

Yeah. That lavish hyperbole is not going to convince anyone that Trump has his shit together. To the absolute contrary, it sounds exactly like the overwrought PR issued on behalf of an intemperate, menacing tyrant.

Which is perhaps because that's precisely what it is.

People will talk around this issue, in unkind and inappropriate ways, by debating Trump's intelligence or his sanity, but that doesn't change the inescapable reality that there is something wrong with the president: He is a terrible person.

And he is a terrible person who has been given virtually unlimited power, which is what turns terrible people into dangerous despots.

There are people tasked with checking that power. They are derelict in their duty. And, because they abet him, whatever the dangerous despot does, the blood will be on their hands, too.

Because the president is observably a terrible person, and there couldn't be a press release in ten million years across ten million galaxies that could be so perfectly crafted as to obscure that fact.

We all see him. He needs to be disempowered. The only people who can do it, won't. There is something wrong with them, too.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

Hosted by a turquoise sofa. Have a seat and chat.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Suggested by Shaker catvoncat: "When you write by hand, do you have a preferred writing instrument? A particular type of pen or pencil or other implement? A particular type/color of ink?"

I prefer pen to pencil, and my favorite is a very cheesy touristy pen with my name on it that Iain bought for me at the Hoover Dam on a business trip. :)

Open Wide...

Monday Links!

This list o' links brought to you by freezing rain. (Ugh!)

Recommended Reading:

Jenn Fang at Reappropriate: [Content Note: Racism] (Re)Constructing Asian Masculinity: Trump and the "Racial Castration" of Kim Jong Un

Samuel James at Black Girl in Maine: [CN: White supremacy; patriarchy; classism] How Does the President Get Away with All This Dumb Shit?

Mary Annette Pember at Rewire: [CN: Misogyny; racism; birthing danger and stigma] The Midwives' Resistance: How Native Women Are Reclaiming Birth on Their Terms

stavvers at Another Angry Woman: [CN: Discussion of depression] Five Things Wrong with Johann Hari's Comeback Book That I Spotted from the Extract Alone

Sarah Mulholland at Bloomberg: [CN: Video may autoplay at link] Why Some Shopping Malls May Be in Deeper Trouble Than You Think

Breanna Edwards at the Root: [CN: Sexual harassment] Mary J. Blige Talks Sexual Harassment at Golden Globes Event: 'Don't Touch Me or I'll Kill You'

Princess Weekes: [CN: Anti-Blackness] The Epic Snubbing of Get Out and Tiffany Haddish at The Golden Globes — Can We Fix the Comedy Category Please?

Colin Lecher at the Verge: James Damore Sues Google for Allegedly Discriminating Against Conservative White Men

Matt Novak at Gizmodo: Pfizer Halts Drug Research for Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Because It's Too Expensive

James Whitbrook at io9: A Thor: Ragnarok-Inspired, 'Maiden-Wooing' Valkyrie Is Marvel's New Exiles Member

James Grebey at Inverse: [CN: Last Jedi Spoilers] Like Mark Hamill, Daisy Ridley Also Had Concerns About Last Jedi Script

The Shameful Narcissist at Her Eponymous Blog: TSN's 2017 Top Games List

Leave your links and recommendations in comments. Self-promotion welcome and encouraged!

Open Wide...

The Seventh Sentence on Page 169

Whatever book you're reading right now, turn to page 169 and share the seventh sentence. No titles. Just the sentence. Let's see what story we end up telling together, in these series of isolated sentences!

"The pressure to be a perfect wife, mother, and daughter can be unbearable."

[Previously.]

Open Wide...

This Doesn't Honor Any Women at All

[Content Note: Misogyny.]

It wasn't enough for NBC to tweet that Oprah Winfrey should be president based on one speech, then delete the tweet, then blame a "third party agency" for tweeting something they claim was "not meant to be a political statement."

NBC News then had to go and tweet this shit:


"Analysis." LOL shut the fuck up.

The always insightful Sarah of High Heart made an excellent observation about NBC's framing:


To which I added this thought:


Setting aside the tired narrative about Hillary Clinton's supposed failure to be inspirational, and additionally setting aside the many problems with doing a one-to-one comparison between political stump speeches and an awards show acceptance speech, it doesn't honor Oprah Winfrey to use her to bash Hillary Clinton.

It doesn't honor any women at all, including the ones Oprah mentioned in her address.

Open Wide...

Shaker Gourmet

Whatcha been cooking up in your kitchen lately, Shakers?

Share your favorite recipes, solicit good recipes, share recipes you've recently tried, want to try, are trying to perfect, whatever! Whether they're your own creation, or something you found elsewhere, share away.

Also welcome: Recipes you've seen recently that you'd love to try, but haven't yet!

Open Wide...