Daily Dose of Cute


As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 354

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Here are some things in the news today:

Earlier today by me: Trump Is a Stable Genius, Surrounded by Other Stable Geniuses and Trump Effectively Orders 200,000 People to Leave U.S.

[Content Note: Nativism] E.A. Crunden at ThinkProgress: Trump Said He Wanted Highly Skilled Immigrants; Now He's Forcing Them Out. "According to sources who spoke with McClatchy reporters, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is considering new regulations ending extensions for H-1Bs — visas for skilled workers in a range of fields like technology, research, and education. Foreign students hoping to stay and work in research, advocacy, and the non-profit sector are also among those who rely on H-1Bs. The visa is typically offered for three years with the option of renewal up to six years. Currently, some recipients with pending green card applications have the option of extending that time period, allowing them to work in the United States until their paperwork comes through. The vast majority are Indian workers, many employed by large technology companies. If the new regulations go into effect, they will be forced to leave."

[CN: Nativism; abuse; death] Sarah Stillman at the New Yorker: When Deportation Is a Death Sentence. "In the past decade, a growing number of immigrants fearing for their safety have come to the U.S., only to be sent back to their home countries — with the help of border agents, immigration judges, politicians, and U.S. voters — to violent deaths. Even as border apprehensions have dropped, the number of migrants coming to the U.S. because their lives are in danger has soared. According to the United Nations, since 2008 there has been a fivefold increase in asylum seekers just from Central America's Northern Triangle — Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador — where organized gangs are dominant. In 2014, according to the U.N., Honduras had the world's highest murder rate; El Salvador and Guatemala were close behind."

I am running out of ways to say that I loathe the Trump administration's hostility for immigrants. Writing about this nativist, white supremacist, abusive, deadly shit makes my heart feel like it's being squeezed in a vice.

* * *

Kristen Welker, Carol E. Lee, Julia Ainsley, and Hallie Jackson at NBC News: Initial Talks Underway About Trump Interview in Mueller Russia Probe. "Anticipating that Special Counsel Robert Mueller will ask to interview [Donald] Trump, the president's legal team is discussing a range of potential options for the format, including written responses to questions in lieu of a formal sit-down, according to three people familiar with the matter. ...Trump's legal team is seeking clarification on whether the president would be interviewed directly by Mueller, as well as the legal standard for when a president can be interviewed, the location of a possible interview, the topics, and the duration. But the president's team is also seeking potential compromises that could avoid an interview altogether."

We all know why that is: Because his lawyers know that Trump will get tripped up during an interview and want to shield him from accountability. They're hoping, at worst, he'll have to fill out some paperwork which they have a chance to review before it goes to Mueller. And of course the Republican leadership is going along with this categorical nonsense, which they never would for a Democratic president, because they have as much contempt for the rule of law as does their corrupt, disloyal president.

Maude knows Trump ain't trying to get out an interview because he's too busy. Dude's got more free time than any of us do!

Jonathan Swan at Axios: Trump's Secret, Shrinking Schedule. "Trump is starting his official day much later than he did in the early days of his presidency, often around 11am, and holding far fewer meetings, according to copies of his private schedule shown to Axios. This is largely to meet Trump's demands for more 'Executive Time,' which almost always means TV and Twitter time alone in the residence, officials tell us. The schedules shown to me are different than the sanitized ones released to the media and public." Seethe.

Edward Helmore at the Guardian: Jared Kushner's Company Under Renewed Scrutiny Over Chinese and Israeli Deals. "Jared Kushner's business dealings are under renewed scrutiny amid reports that the U.S.'s top financial watchdog is looking into an investment-for-visa program run by the Kushner family's real estate company and questions have been raised about his business dealings in Israel. On Sunday, the Wall Street Journal confirmed that the real estate empire run by the family of Donald Trump's senior adviser and son-in-law had received a subpoena from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requesting information." An entire extended family of corrupt monsters.

In case you'd forgotten, or never knew, Jared's father, Charles Kushner, served time in federal prison after being convicted in 2005 of illegal campaign contributions, tax evasion, and witness tampering. Just a real cool family, much like the Trumps.

Hey, remember when the smarmy butthole masquerading as a journalist named Michael Wolff released a book that everyone is talking about, starting with an excerpt about how Steve Bannon called Don Trump Jr. a traitor, which launched ten million stories about a feud between Bannon and Donald Trump, and I was like that's total bullshit but what a useful scandal? Yeah.

Mike Allen at Axios: Exclusive: Bannon Apologizes. "My comments were aimed at Paul Manafort, a seasoned campaign professional with experience and knowledge of how the Russians operate. He should have known they are duplicitous, cunning, and not our friends. To reiterate, those comments were not aimed at Don Jr. ...Donald Trump, Jr. is both a patriot and a good man. He has been relentless in his advocacy for his father and the agenda that has helped turn our country around." Huh!

John Hudson at BuzzFeed: Trump Administration Set for Broad Engagement with Russia in Early 2018. "The Trump administration is beginning the New Year with a flurry of high-level engagements with the Russian government, U.S. officials tell BuzzFeed News, including the first meeting between Moscow's top general and NATO's supreme allied commander since the U.S. severed several channels with Russia during the Ukraine crisis in 2013. ...'This is all part of the normal course of diplomacy and it should come as no surprise to anyone that there are many issues that we need to discuss with the Russians,' State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert told BuzzFeed News." Hahahahahahaha yep! Just normal stuff! Lots to discuss!

* * *

Tara Culp-Ressler at ThinkProgress: Companies That Announced Big Bonuses After GOP Tax Cut Are Now Laying Off Their Workers.
At least two major companies that publicly announced large bonuses for their employees after the passage of a massive GOP-led tax overhaul — which represented a windfall for wealthy Americans and big corporations — quietly laid off hundreds of workers at the same time.

Comcast laid off more than 500 sales employees right before Christmas, according to documents reviewed by media outlets including the Philadelphia Enquirer, Philly.com, and the Daily News. The documents were confirmed by at least one former Comcast employee who was not identified in the press.

AT&T is also in the process of laying off thousands of employees, according to the Communication Workers of America (CWA) union, which represents AT&T workers. CWA filed a lawsuit against the company claiming that some of those layoffs are needless, and that the timing of the terminations — just two weeks before Christmas — represents "an extraordinary act of corporate cruelty."

Both telecommunications giants struck a very different tone in the aftermath of the tax bill that was rushed through Congress last month.

Comcast and AT&T were among the businesses that claimed Republican lawmakers' effort to restructure the tax code in favor of wealthy corporations would allow them to be more generous to their workers, and publicly announced $1,000 year-end bonuses for their employees. The CEOs of both companies specifically cited the tax bill in separate press releases touting these "special" bonuses.
In good news for poor, beleaguered telecom giants, at least the rescinding of Net Neutrality will give them a huge windfall!

*jumps into Christmas tree*

Alice Ollstein at TPM: States Could Run out of Funding for Children's Health Insurance Within Weeks. "In a hastily-thrown-together funding package passed just before Christmas, Congress agreed to fund the Children's Health Insurance Program for six months, backdated to September when they allowed the program covering roughly 9 million children and pregnant women to expire. That nearly $3 billion emergency stopgap was supposed to carry CHIP until the end of March, but states are reporting that they could run out of money in just a few weeks. The Trump administration's Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services now says it can only guarantee full funding for all states through late January, sparking uncertainty for millions of low-income families across the country."

This is what class warfare looks like.

* * *

[CN: Police brutality] Kenrya Rankin at Colorlines: 2017 Police Shootings by the Numbers: Officers Fatally Shot More People in 2017 Than They Did in 2016. "The Post's 'Fatal Force' database logged 987 fatal police shootings last year, versus 963 in 2016 and 995 in 2015. The newspaper compiles its list using local news coverage, public records, and social media reports. According to The Post, it recorded more than twice as many deadly police-involved shootings that the Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) annual average. The agency is set to debut a new system for collecting police shooting data this month, but as it will still be voluntary for law enforcement to report data, it is unclear if it will make the FBI's reports more accurate. The FBI reports that 46 police officers were 'feloniously' killed in the line of duty in 2017, down from 66 in 2016. These numbers exclude accidents."

[CN: White supremacy; anti-Blackness; misogynoir] Deborah Small at the Root: Black Women's Lives Matter: A Discussion with BLM Co-Founder Patrisse Khan-Cullors and Author Asha Bandele.
What are we doing to honor and care for black women who are standing on the front lines of justice?

It was black women who did more than any other group to try to stop the election of an aggressive white supremacist to the highest office in the land. And it was black women who worked to shift the federal government by sending Doug Jones from Alabama to the Senate. And it was black women who founded the Black Lives Matter Movement, the most recent and deeply powerful iteration in the ongoing fight against police and state-sponsored harm and death.

I sat down to talk with Black Lives Matter co-founder Patrisse Khan-Cullors and asha bandele, a senior director at the Drug Policy Alliance and the co-author of Khan-Cullors' memoir, When They Call You a Terrorist: A Black Lives Matter Memoir (St. Martin's Press) which will be published on Jan. 16. The offering, while a personal narrative, nevertheless unpacks the complex policies and sheds light on the human cost of the drug war and mass incarceration, as well as its impact on families.
This interview is a definite must-read.

[CN: Racism; carcerality] Matt Shuham at TPM: ACLU New Jersey to Prisons: New Jim Crow Book Ban Is Unconstitutional. "Michelle Alexander's acclaimed 2010 book The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness is banned in two New Jersey prisons, the New Jersey chapter of the ACLU revealed with a public records request. The restriction is notable, given the book's focus on what it characterizes as a racial caste system perpetuated through harsh drug laws and mass incarceration, even as thousands of books are banned from prisons nationwide. Several outlets reported Monday on the open records request, and on the ACLU's response: that the prisons were illegally blocking the book based on its content, rather than any danger or hinderance it posed to the facilities' operation."

[CN: Climate change] Maddie Stone at Earther: Climate Change Is Causing the Seafloor to Sink. "If there's one thing we're learning about this global planetary experiment called climate change, it's that there are unexpected consequences. Case in point: All of the water pouring off Earth's melting ice sheets is making the oceans heavier, so much so that seafloors are literally sinking. And that could be messing with our measurements of global sea level rise. ...[W]hen you add all those little changes up, the authors find that our satellites are underestimating the amount sea levels have risen due to added ocean water by about eight percent."

[CN: Homophobia] Andy Towle at Towleroad: SCOTUS Lets Mississippi's Heinous Anti-LGBTQ 'Religious Freedom' Law Stand. "The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear a case challenging Mississippi's HB1523, the nation's most heinous anti-LGBTQ 'religious freedom' law, which took effect in October. The AP reports: 'The justices did not comment Monday in their decision to leave in place a federal appeals court ruling that allowed the law to take effect. A three-judge panel held that the law's challengers failed to show they would be harmed by it. The appellate judges did not rule on the law's substance.' HB 1523 allows officials and healthcare providers in the state to discriminate freely against LGBTQ individuals due to their own 'moral' or religious objections, such as turning away same-sex couples who seek marriage licenses or declining hormone therapy to transgender patients."

[CN: Sexual assault; arson] Rebekah Entralgo at ThinkProgress: Roy Moore Accuser Loses Everything in House Fire Under Investigation for Arson. "Tina Johnson, one of the eight women who accused former Republican candidate for Senate in Alabama, Roy Moore, of sexual misconduct, lost her Etowah County home in a fire on Tuesday. The fire is currently being investigated as arson, according to local authorities. ...Johnson and her family reportedly lost everything in the fire. 'I am devastated, just devastated,' Johnson told AL.com on Friday. 'We have just the clothes on our backs.'" Sob.


What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

Trump Effectively Orders 200,000 People to Leave U.S.

[Content Note: Nativism; white supremacy; abuse.]

The Temporary Protected Status (TPS) program is an immigration statute established by Congress as part of the Immigration Act of 1990, which grants safety to eligible nationals from countries designated to qualify by virtue of ongoing conflict, a natural and/or environmental disaster, or other extraordinary conditions.

In May, the Trump administration took its first swing at TPS, by extending the TPS for 60,000 Haitian immigrants, who came to the U.S. after the devastating 2010 earthquake, for only six months. In November, the Trump administration announced it was not renewing the TPS for those Haitians who arrived after a 2010 earthquake, and was further not renewing the TPS for 2,500 Nicaraguans who had lived in the U.S. under the provision for nearly two decades. At that time, the administration made no announcement regarding the TPS for 200,000 Salvadorans, whose status was due to expire early this year.

Today, the Trump administration will reportedly announce that it will not extend their provisional residency. Nick Miroff at the Washington Post reports:

The Trump administration will announce Monday that it intends to cancel the provisional residency permits of about 200,000 Salvadorans who have lived in the country since at least 2001, leaving them vulnerable to deportation, according to multiple people on Capitol Hill who've been apprised of the plan.

The administration will notify the Salvadorans they have until Sept. 9, 2019 to leave the United States or find a new way to obtain legal residency, according to a copy of the announcement prepared by the Department of Homeland Security that will be published Monday morning.

The Salvadorans were granted what is known as Temporary Protected Status, or TPS, after a series of earthquakes devastated the country in 2001.

DHS is preparing to announce that Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen has decided the conditions in El Salvador have improved significantly since then, ending the original justification for the Salvadorans' deportation protection, these people said.
Despite the fact that the order tells the Salvadorans with provisional residencies they have a "choice" to leave "or find a new way to obtain legal residency," the Trump administration is clearly going to erect every possible barrier to obtaining legal residency in order to remain — which is a costly and time-consuming process even when the sitting president isn't hostile to immigrants. Thus, this announcement effectively orders 200,000 Salvadorans to leave the country.

Further, it has given them just eight months [sic; please see update at end of post] after living here for at least 17 years, to arrange to move their entire lives to El Salvador. It can take longer than eight months to sell a house, and it might be impossible to raise the funds for an extremely costly international move at all, no less without the proceeds from a property sale.

And that's just one example of the unfathomable impracticality of this expectation. That doesn't even begin to address the aggressive indecency of it.

Kevin Appleby of the New York-based Center for Migration Studies told the WaPo: "The fix has been in for these TPS decisions, regardless of the facts on the ground in these countries. The decision on El Salvador is particularly damaging. It not only will uproot families and children who have lived here for years, it also will further destabilize an already violent country. It is incredibly short-sighted and undermines our interest in a stable Central America."

Let me be blunt here: Donald Trump has just ordered that two hundred thousand U.S. residents get the fuck out of the country, with no regard for their families, for their communities, for their safety — and with no concern for what it says about this nation that we are willing to expel nearly a quarter of a million people just like that.

Trump has ordered 200,000 people to leave the U.S at once. That is extraordinary. It is horrifying. It is chilling to immigrant families — and it should disgust everyone else, given its evident nativist and white supremacist motivations.

And it will barely make a blip in the news. Which should shame us all.

UPDATE: The Trump administration has pushed back the deadline by one year. Which, to be clear, is still heinous. It's not at all clear that a yearlong extension will provide enough time for 200,000 people to have petitions for legal residency processed and/or to raise funds and make plans to leave the country. And it does absolutely nothing to address the horrendous rationale behind the decision.

Open Wide...

The Golden Globes Thread

[Content Note: Rape culture.]

I didn't watch the Golden Globes last night, because I didn't have the wherewithal to watch a bunch of wealthy, powerful women talking about how "things are going to be different now!" and wealthy, powerful men posturing about how they totes care about sexual harassment and assault.

That's not to suggest that no one there was earnest: To the absolute contrary, there were a number of women in attendance who have long spoken out about women's safety and representation in the industry, women like Ashley Judd and Viola Davis and Eva Longoria and Geena Davis, and I couldn't bear to watch them have to suffer through the disingenuous preening of people who treat dismantling the rape culture like a fucking bandwagon.

Some lousy dude makes a milquetoast statement about #MeToo. Cut to Debra Messing's reaction in the audience.

Nah. I just couldn't do it.

I couldn't watch the show, and I couldn't watch the red carpet, where I knew there would be an abundance of shit like Justin Timberlake wearing "a Time's Up button and all-black, despite the fact that his latest film was Woody Allen's Wonder Wheel," and of course nobody asking him about that inherent hypocrisy.

And because I am a feminist killjoy, I need to complain with a massive pout that Oprah gave one speech at the Golden Globes (a speech which I just watched and frankly thought was fine, but nothing special) and now "President Oprah" is trending on Twitter.


Countless people said they had to hold their noses to vote for Hillary Clinton, or couldn't bring themselves to vote for her at all, but Oprah just has to give one speech and people are ready to vote her into the Oval Office? Fuck off. The lesson we've learned from electing Donald Trump cannot be that having no political experience isn't disqualifying.

We will literally never have a career public servant as a president again, because patriots who dedicate their lives to public service make mistakes — and also make policy decisions that don't look good 20 years later, through the lens of progress.

It's impossible to look "perfect" for decades, but it's possible to look "perfect" while delivering a single speech. That doesn't make someone fit for the goddamn presidency!

This is why I wasn't up for the Golden Globes.

Anyway! It sounds like Seth Meyers did all right, and the usual suspects were doing the heavy lifting, as Debra Messing and Eva Longoria called out E!'s bullshit right to their correspondents' faces.

There were probably other good and bad things about the show I didn't watch, so here's a thread for discussion!

Open Wide...

Trump Is a Stable Genius, Surrounded by Other Stable Geniuses

On Saturday, during his morning tweetshitz, Donald Trump tweeted a pronouncement that he is a "very stable genius."


Sure. As we all know, people who are stable geniuses are always tweeting about what stable geniuses they are. Just to make sure everyone knows.

Obviously, Trump, being the stable genius that he is, has surrounded himself with other stable geniuses, like Stephen Miller, the White House's Nazi-in-residence, who is such a stable genius that his appearance on CNN's State of the Union with Jake Tapper ended the way all interviews with stable geniuses end — with the host cutting you off for being a reprehensible hack and telling you so.

MILLER: ...the real experience of Donald Trump —

TAPPER: You, you — There's one view that you care about right now, and you're being obsequious, and you're being a factotum, to please him, okay?

MILLER: No, no! No, you know who I care about?

TAPPER: And I think I've wasted enough of my viewers' time.

MILLER: You know who I care about?

TAPPER: Thank you, Stephen.

MILLER: Hey, Jake! [crosstalk]

TAPPER: As Republican lawmakers call for Attorney General Jeff Sessions to resign, in a major reversal Democrats are now...
And then, of course, that stable genius had to be escorted out by security after refusing to leave, prompting the host to return to air after a commercial break by saying, "Welcome back to State of the Union — and to Planet Earth. I'm Jake Tapper."

All perfectly normal stuff when dealing with stable geniuses.

Ahem.

The president and his minions are clearly reckless, erratic, impulsive men (and like three women) whose IQs are far less relevant than the fact that they are spectacularly ignorant and determined to remain so — and, even more importantly, are unwaveringly committed to malice as the centerpiece of their policymaking.

Trump is not a "very stable genius," and the most notable fact about his saying so is that it reminds us all that what he is is an inveterate liar and megalomaniac with zero perspective on himself.

But Trump could literally be the most stable, most intelligent, and most honest person in Washington, D.C., and none of it would fucking matter at all if he persisted nonetheless in being the most cruel.

And in valuing cruelty above all, maybe even above loyalty, in the people he employs.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of a purple sofa

Hosted by a purple sofa. Have a seat and chat.

Open Wide...

The Virtual Pub Is Open

image of a pub Photoshopped to be named 'The Beloved Community Pub'
[Explanations: lol your fat. pathetic anger bread. hey your gay.]

Belly up to the bar,
and be in this space together.

Open Wide...

Friday Links!

This list o' links brought to you by unicorn t-shirts.

Recommended Reading:

Rob Long on Twitter: How to Compose Image Descriptions in Tweets

Nora Krug at the Washington Post: Two Dying Memoirists Wrote Bestsellers About Their Final Days; Then Their Spouses Fell in Love

[Content Note: Worker exploitation and abuse; injury and death] Kiera Feldman at ProPublica: Trashed: Inside the Deadly World of Private Garbage Collection

[CN: Misogynoir; maternal mortality] Amie Newman at Our Bodies Ourselves: Will This Black Mother's Death Spark the Change We Need?

[CN: Anti-choicery] Evonnia Woods at Reproaction: 40 Days for Life: Protesting the Protesters

Sarah Sloat at Inverse: Trump's Offshore Drilling Plan Is Poised to Devastate the Environment

[CN: Rape culture; medical rape; X-Files spoilers] Amy Imhoff at the Mary Sue: The Rape Culture Is out There in The X-Files Season 11 Premiere, and Fans Are Angry

[CN: Transphobia; erasure] Sameer Rao at Colorlines: The Danger of Dave Chappelle's Transphobic 'Jokes'

Kate Conger at Gizmodo: Amazon Reports Spike in US Law Enforcement Requests for User Data

Mustang Bobby at Bark Bark Woof Woof: Iguana Get Warm

Angry Asian Man: This Cover of "California Dreamin'" Is Cool as Hell

Leave your links and recommendations in comments. Self-promotion welcome and encouraged!

Open Wide...

Today in Rape Culture: And Then Come the Rehabilitations

[Content Note: Sexual harassment.]

So, I have been less optimistic about the lasting impact of the current spate of exposures of sexual predators than many other people have been — and the reason is because I have written about the rape culture for 13 years now, and among the many things I have learned is that our culture loves to rehabilitate abusive men.

Yes, some men have lost their jobs and suffered a bit of public humiliation. Men who are millionaires; men who will be just fine.

At the same time, in the middle of what is frequently called "the #MeToo moment," its very moniker suggesting an inherent transience, Mel Gibson made a comeback in a mainstream holiday franchise, despite infamously having sexually harassed a police officer, having been recorded verbally abusing his girlfriend, and having pleaded "no contest" to domestic violence charges.

Roman Polanski is still making movies. Woody Allen is still making movies. Johnny Depp is still making movies. Michael Fassbender, Christian Bale, the Affleck brothers, Terrence Howard, Gary Oldman, Jared Leto, and dozens of other men are still A-level celebrities after being accused of domestic violence and/or sexual assault.

Some of them have never even faced much public scrutiny for their abuse. Some of them have been vociferously defended and their accusers vilified.

Plenty of men, from Charlie Sheen to Mike Tyson, have benefited from second and third and fourth chances, even after they have confessed to or been convicted of violent crimes against women.

I am not remotely convinced that this dynamic has changed. Regretfully, I expect that following these recent disclosures, after some "reasonable" period of time, then the rehabilitations will begin.

Case in point: David Letterman.


Not only is David Letterman coming back from his inglorious slink away from the limelight with a brand new talk show; he's coming back with President Barack Obama as his first guest.

It also marks Obama's "first post-presidency TV talk show interview."

That's quite a rehabilitation. In the middle of "the #MeToo moment," the former President of the United States is lending his stamp of credibility to Letterman — a man who behaved disgracefully, creating a hostile workplace environment for women, some of whose careers were derailed because they didn't want to sleep with him.

It doesn't mean anything to believe women if the most powerful men on the planet won't do anything about the truths we tell.

[Related Reading: The Rehabilitation of Mike Tyson.]

Open Wide...

The Make-Up Thread

Here is your semi-regular make-up thread, to discuss all things make-up and make-up adjacent.

Do you have a make-up product you'd recommend? Are you looking for the perfect foundation which has remained frustratingly elusive? Need or want to offer make-up tips? Searching for hypoallergenic products? Want to grouse about how you hate make-up? Want to gush about how you love it?

Whatever you like—have at it!

* * *

As you know, I am pretty committed to quick and easy make-up routines, but occasionally I like to take my time and get all gussied up for a night out. Here is a recent evening look that I really loved:

image of me standing in a hallway in my home, wearing glasses and a grey sweater, with my hair up and make-up done
#NoFilter

To get this look, I started by moisturizing with Drunk Elephant's Lala Retro Whipped Cream. Then I applied my absolute favorite primer of all time — Neutrogena's Healthy Skin Primer — followed by Neutrogena's Hydro Boost Hydrating Tint. I used some of Nyx's Born to Glow Liquid Illuminator in Sunbeam across my cheekbones, then Nyx's Bright Idea Illuminating Stick in Coralicious on my cheeks.

On my eyes, I started with a layer of Urban Decay's Virgin all over the lid, then added Urban Decay's Hustle in the crease and outer corners. On top of just the lid, below the crease, I used Nyx's matte Lid Lingerie in Iconic. (This is one of my new favorite products! I LOVE IT. It goes on so smoothly, and you don't even need a steady hand to apply it. You might have noticed I never wear liquid eyeliner, because I've never gotten the knack for applying it, but this liquid eye color from Nyx is A DREAM.) I then went over the inner corners of my eyes and along my brow bone with Thrive Causemetics' Brilliant Eye Brightener, dabbed my lashes with Thrive's Liquid Lash Extensions, and finished my brows with Ardell's Brow Sculpting Gel in Clear.

On my lips is L'oreal's Infallible Paints Metallics in Galactic Foil. (Best name ever!)

(As always, I'm not affiliated with any of these companies in any way, nor am I getting anything in exchange for these recommendations. I just like the products!)

I know that sounds like A LOT, but each item goes on very quickly, so the whole routine doesn't take long. And I hate the feeling of heavy make-up on my face, so all of these products go on light. It doesn't feel like I'm wearing anything at all.

These products are also all good for combination skin. After much trial and error, I've finally found a good collection of products that don't make me break out. Which, given my fussy skin, is nothing short of revolutionary, lol.

Anyway! What's up with you?

* * *

Please note, as always, that advice should be not be offered to an individual person unless they solicit it. Further: This thread is open to everyone—women, men, genderqueer folks. People who are make-up experts, and people who are make-up newbies. Also, because there is a lot of racist language used in discussions of make-up, and in make-up names, please be aware to avoid turns of phrase that are alienating to women of color, like "nude" or "flesh tone" when referring to a peachy or beige color. I realize some recommended products may have names that use these words, so please be considerate about content noting for white supremacist (and/or Orientalist) product naming.

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Sophie the Torbie Cat crouching behind the sofa, with her front paws up on its back, looking to one side as if on the lookout for an incoming play-attack from one of her sisters
Sophs in the late afternoon sunshine.

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 351

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Here are some things in the news today:

Earlier today by me: Authoritarianism Watch: We Had a Year. It's Almost Up. and Where'd He Get Radicalized?

Helen Branswell at STAT: CDC Plans Session on 'Preparing for the Unthinkable': A Nuclear Detonation. "With this week's bellicose boasting about who has the bigger red button on his desk, an alert Thursday from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention felt more than a bit on the nose. With the prospect of actual nuclear war breaking out between North Korea and the United States seeming ever more real, the CDC is moving to prepare health professionals and others on what the public health response would be to a nuclear detonation. The CDC announced it is staging a grand rounds — a teaching session — on the topic. The target audience: Doctors, nurses, epidemiologists, pharmacists, veterinarians, certified health education specialists, laboratory scientists, and others. The event will be held Jan. 16." Everything is fine.

E.A. Crunden at ThinkProgress: U.S. Hits Pakistan on 'Severe' Religious Freedom Violations Amid Worsening Relations. "In the latest indicator of souring U.S.-Pakistan relations, the State Department this week placed Pakistan on a special watch list over its religious freedom violations, an aggressive move likely to worsen dialogue between the two allies. In a press release Thursday, U.S. State Department spokesperson Heather Nauert announced that Secretary of State Rex Tillerson had re-designated a number of countries as 'countries of particular concern' under the Religious Freedom Act of 1998. The list of countries includes Burma, China, Eritrea, Iran, North Korea, Sudan, Saudi Arabia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. While those re-designations were expected, one name came as a surprise. Pakistan was singled out separately and placed on a distinct list for 'severe violations' of religious freedom, following days of acrimony between the South Asian country and the United States. The announcement failed to detail the rationale behind the decision."

Sam Levin at the Guardian: 'Trump Has Declared War on California': State Defiant as White House Takes Aim. "The federal government's war on the Golden State — which overwhelmingly rejected the president in 2016 and has become a liberal leader in the anti-Trump resistance — has intensified in recent days with the administration threatening California's immigrants, world-famous coastal shores, taxpayers, and weed smokers. The political warfare by Trump, who reportedly holds deep grudges and is said to be obsessed with his electoral wins and losses, has the potential to cause havoc and destroy livelihoods in the state of California, the world's sixth largest economy. 'These are bullying tactics of the Trump administration,' said Barbara Lee, a congresswoman in northern California who has protested against the president since his inauguration. 'We are not going to tolerate it. We are going to fight back.'"

* * *

[Content Note: Nativism] Laura Meckler at the Wall Street Journal: Trump Administration Seeks $18 Billion Over Decade to Expand Border Wall. "The Trump administration is asking Congress for nearly $18 billion to construct more than 700 miles of new and replacement barriers along the southwest border, offering its most detailed description yet of the president's vision for a border wall with Mexico." Wait — Congress? But I thought Mexico was going to pay for Trump's grotesque monument to nativist isolationism. Cough.

[CN: Nativism] Anita Kumar at McClatchy: Tillis No Longer Involved in Key Senate Negotiations on Dreamers. "Sen. Thom Tillis, a North Carolina Republican who has sought to make immigration one of his signature issues, is no longer involved in key bipartisan Senate negotiations over how to protect hundreds of thousands of immigrants who will soon lose their renewable work permits, according to four sources from both sides of the aisle. Tillis' office says the senator continues to be involved on immigration policy and that his staff has tried to engage with other Senate offices but with limited success." So Tillis is blaming Democrats, but: "Tillis has not been at meetings of the working group for several weeks, according to four people familiar with the negotiations, many of whom blame his staff for discussing private talks, being unresponsive, or misrepresenting the senator's own immigration bill." Welp. It's unconscionable that this is how Tillis is behaving when millions of lives hang in the balance.

[CN: Nativism] Tina Vasquez at Rewire: Parents Consider Their Options While Trump Rips Away Immigrants' Legal Protections. "Araceli Velasquez, an undocumented immigrant from El Salvador, made contingency plans immediately after Trump was elected, reaching out to organizations and gathering resources should she be targeted by the government of a virulently anti-immigration president. She assumed her husband, a TPS recipient also from El Salvador, could care for their children in the United States if she were deported. TPS, a program intended to help those who have suffered catastrophic danger in their countries of origin, seemed like a non-issue. Or so they thought. There are hints that Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen won't extend TPS for people from El Salvador."

The Trump administration hates immigrants more than it cares about the fact that its hatred makes it perpetrators of child neglect and abandonment. The parents of children forcibly separated from them sure aren't the perpetrators of this child abuse. It's the architects of these heinous policies.

[CN: Nativism; child abuse] Nicole Rodriguez at Newsweek/Crooks & Liars: Trump's Cruel Immigration 'Policies' Creating Health Crisis in Six Million Children. "Donald Trump's threats of mass deportations of migrants and refugees and his generally aggressive stance on immigration have been characterized by opponents as cruel and inhumane. Some policy analysts and physicians go even further, saying they have created a public health crisis for potentially millions of children in the United States. Pediatricians across the country report seeing increases in child patients with sleep and eating disorders, anxiety, depression, and stress that they said have been induced by Trump's policies and words." Rage seethe boil.

* * *


On Twitter, a couple of folks asked me why Mitch McConnell and Paul Ryan were still standing by Trump. There are probably a number of reasons for that, not least of which is that they are both probably compromised by dealings with Russia, too, and are still trying to figure out if there's a way that Trump can effectively obstruct the investigation and then they can look like heroes for finally holding him accountable for abuses of power, once those very abuses of power benefit them.

But, regardless of their reasons for not publicly abandoning their pretense of loyalty yet:


That is to say: I don't believe that Michael Wolff's book was a long-term part of any plan. At the inception of his researching and writing it, about a year ago, the Republican leadership wasn't even yet sure if Trump would work out (i.e. come under their control). But, somewhere along the way, once it became obvious Trump could not be contained, someone almost certainly realized it would be good timing if Wolff's "here's justification for removing him" tract was published just after the tax bill was done.

Give it time. The rats are figuring out their next moves.

And note that, regardless of what those moves are, it will not delay an authoritarian takeover. If the GOP leadership does turn on Trump, they will not oust him to protect the republic. They will oust him only to wrestle control and to enjoy and expand the power he's already seized.

* * *

[CN: Racism; classism] Danielle McLean at ThinkProgress: Trump Administration to Delay Obama Rule Combating Housing Segregation. "The Trump administration is delaying an Obama-era rule that bolstered enforcement of the Fair Housing Act, a decades-old law intended to combat segregation in neighborhoods across the country. While the delay doesn't eliminate the rule entirely, housing advocates say it indicates, at the very least, an attempt by federal officials to weaken hard-fought housing protections. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is planning to push back the deadline for cities to analyze and address issues of segregation and improve conditions for people of color by several years, to October 2020."


[CN: LGBTQ hatred] Christianna Silva at Newsweek/Towleroad: Trump Judicial Nominee Howard Nielson: Gay Judges Shouldn't Hear LGBT Cases. "One of [Donald] Trump's newest judicial nominees says he believes gay judges shouldn't hear cases involving issues that affect the LGBT community. A report by Alliance for Justice found that Howard Nielson was representing the plaintiffs in Hollingsworth v. Perry, a 2013 case that would have banned same-sex marriage in California. As the case played out, Nielson filed a motion saying chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, Vaughn Walker 'had a duty to disclose not only the facts concerning his [same-sex] relationship, but also his marriage intentions.' According to the organization, Nielson said it was 'extremely problematic that Judge Walker is a practicing homosexual himself.' Since the case was about same-sex marriage, Nielson argued that Walker, a Ronald Reagan appointee, could not be unbiased unless he did not intend to marry another man."

[CN: Sexual assault] Beth Reinhard at the Washington Post: Woman Who Accused Roy Moore of Unwanted Sexual Contact Sues Him for Defamation. "In a lawsuit that echoes a civil case against [Donald] Trump, an Alabama woman on Thursday sued failed U.S. Senate candidate Roy Moore and his campaign for defamation, citing harsh personal attacks she faced after coming forward with allegations that he touched her sexually when she was 14 years old. Leigh Corfman is not seeking financial compensation beyond legal costs, said her attorney, Neil Roman. She is asking for a declaratory judgment of defamation, a public apology from Moore, and a court-enforced ban on him or his campaign publicly attacking her again. Corfman said in a statement that the suit seeks 'to do what I could not do as a 14-year-old — hold Mr. Moore and those who enable him accountable.'"

* * *

[CN: Misogyny] My friend Imani Gandy has a terrific thread on Twitter breaking down the gross misogyny in an article about Senator Kirsten Gillibrand. And this piece I wrote last April seems relevant again. Cough.


Which is, of course, to say nothing about the assholes who write the articles replicating the pattern.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

Discussion Thread: How Are You?

Between the anniversary of Trump's inauguration; the regular flow of garbage news; the frustrating obsession of the political press with Michael Wolff's trash gossip book and their unfathomable need for an unreliable, unethical, shitbird who disgraces their profession to tell them Trump is a monster when that has been manifestly evident to even the most casual of glancing eyes since he announced his run for the presidency; and the weather, I am feeling grumpy.

Not terrible, lol. Just grumpy.

But simultaneously, I'm feeling very grateful for this community; enthusiastic about my determination to create collective moments of joy for us this year in spite of (to spite!) Trump and the Republicans; joyful that Matilda and Olivia are both feeling better; appreciative of my friends near and far; and fortunate AF to love and like Iain very much every day.

How are you?

Open Wide...

Where'd He Get Radicalized?

[Content Note: White supremacy; anti-Blackness; terrorism.]

Care of Lori Pilger at the Lincoln Journal Star, here is a story that, for some mysterious (cough) reason, isn't running 24/7 on the cable news networks: FBI Accuses White Supremacist of Terror Attack on Amtrak Train in Rural Nebraska.

The FBI says an armed 26-year-old Missouri man who breached a secured area to stop an Amtrak train in southwest Nebraska in October has links to a white supremacist group and expressed an interest in "killing black people," according to court documents unsealed Wednesday.

Taylor Michael Wilson, of St. Charles, Missouri, is charged in U.S. District Court in Lincoln with terrorism attacks and other violence against railroad carriers and mass transportation systems.

...Wilson, who has a permit in Missouri to carry a concealed handgun, had a loaded .38-caliber handgun in his waistband, a speed loader in his pocket, and a National Socialist Movement business card on him when he was arrested.

He also had a backpack with three more speed loaders, a box of ammunition, a knife, tin snips, scissors, and a ventilation mask inside.

...In the newly unsealed federal case, [FBI Special Agent Monte Czaplewski] wrote that investigators had found videos and PDF files on Wilson's phone of a white supremacist banner over a highway, other alt-right postings, and documents related to how to kill people.

He said an acquaintance contacted by the FBI said that Wilson had been acting strange since June and had joined an "alt-right" neo-Nazi group that he found while researching white supremacy forums online.

Czaplewski said agents believe Wilson had traveled with members of the group to the Unite the Right rally at Charlottesville, Virginia, in August, where a woman was killed and 19 injured when a man used his vehicle to ram a crowd of counter-protesters.
In addition to the weaponry found on Wilson at the time of his arrest, Agent Czaplewski detailed what was uncovered when the FBI searched Wilson's home, including "a tactical vest, 11 AR-15 (rifle) ammunition magazines with approximately 190 rounds of .223 ammunition, one drum-style ammunition magazine for a rifle, firearms tactical accessories (lights), 100 rounds of 9mm ammunition, approximately 840 rounds of 5.45x39 rifle ammunition, white supremacy documents and paperwork, several additional handgun and rifle magazines, gunpowder, ammunition-reloading supplies, and a pressure plate."

And that's not all. They also found "a hidden compartment with a handmade shield," and "15 firearms, including a fully-automatic rifle, ammunition and firearms magazines, and a tactical body armor carrier with ceramic ballistic plates."

That is quite an arsenal.

Let's be frank about this: If a person of color and/or a Muslim person had been discovered to possess such an extensive cache of weaponry after trying to fuck with a train, we would be hearing about it on a loop.

But because it was a white man, whose ideology is white supremacy, we aren't asking where he got radicalized.

It's a little too uncomfortable for lots of people to acknowledge that the ideology underwriting his homegrown terrorism is as American as apple pie and shared by the United States president.

Suffice it to say, I disagree vehemently with the notion that we should be indulging those people's discomfort at the expense of marginalized people's safety.

Open Wide...

Authoritarianism Watch: We Had a Year. It's Almost Up.

In February, I recommended this interview with Yale professor Timothy Snyder, who warned "we have at most a year to defend the Republic, perhaps less." My friend Sarah Kendzior also warned soon after Donald Trump's election that we had around a year to prevent a full-on authoritarian takeover.

We are now weeks away from the anniversary of Trump's inauguration, and here are some things I've read this morning:

1. [Content Note: Video may autoplay at link] John Solomon at the Hill: FBI Launches New Clinton Foundation Investigation. "The Justice Department has launched a new inquiry into whether the Clinton Foundation engaged in any pay-to-play politics or other illegal activities while Hillary Clinton served as Secretary of State, law enforcement officials and a witness tells The Hill. FBI agents from Little Rock, Ark., where the Foundation was started, have taken the lead in the investigation and have interviewed at least one witness in the last month, and law enforcement officials said additional activities are expected in coming weeks."

This is a gross abuse of power. Targeting political opponents this way is also a hallmark of authoritarian regimes.

2. [CN: Disablist language] Matthew Gertz at Politico: I've Studied the Trump-Fox Feedback Loop for Months; It's Crazier Than You Think. "Many of the president's most vicious tweets, which often baffle observers because they seem to come out of nowhere, make more sense when you realize that they are actually his responses to Fox's programming. ...Trump's morning tweets upend the news cycle, with cable news producers and assignment editors redistributing time and resources to cover his latest comments. Statements from the president are inherently newsworthy. But the result is certainly a positive one for Fox: The network's partisan programming gets validation from the president, and forces the rest of the press to cover Fox's obsessions whether they are newsworthy or not."

And because Trump obsessively watches (and routinely compliments) Fox News, and amplifies their contorted take on the news, they have an ever greater incentive to broadcast what he wants to hear. They have essentially become a de facto propaganda outlet for the White House. (More directly than they have been before.)

State-influenced media that twists the news to a leader's favor, especially in ways that minimize his despotism, is also a hallmark of authoritarian regimes.

3. Michael S. Schmidt at the New York Times: Obstruction Inquiry Shows Trump's Struggle to Keep Grip on Russia Investigation.

[When Sessions went against Trump's wishes and recused himself from the Justice Department's Russia investigation], the president erupted in anger in front of numerous White House officials, saying he needed his attorney general to protect him. Mr. Trump said he had expected his top law enforcement official to safeguard him the way he believed Robert F. Kennedy, as attorney general, had done for his brother John F. Kennedy and Eric H. Holder Jr. had for Barack Obama.

Mr. Trump then asked, "Where's my Roy Cohn?" He was referring to his former personal lawyer and fixer, who had been Senator Joseph R. McCarthy's top aide during the investigations into communist activity in the 1950s and died in 1986.

...The special counsel has received handwritten notes from Mr. Trump's former chief of staff, Reince Priebus, showing that Mr. Trump talked to Mr. Priebus about how he had called Mr. Comey to urge him to say publicly that he was not under investigation. The president's determination to fire Mr. Comey even led one White House lawyer to take the extraordinary step of misleading Mr. Trump about whether he had the authority to remove him.

The New York Times has also learned that four days before Mr. Comey was fired, one of Mr. Sessions's aides asked a congressional staff member whether he had damaging information about Mr. Comey, part of an apparent effort to undermine the F.B.I. director.

...Mr. Trump began to discuss openly with White House officials his desire to fire Mr. Comey. This unnerved some inside the White House counsel's office.
The gist of that is: Trump's attempts to obstruct justice have been just as relentless and brazen as anyone with any sense has imagined they've been.

And there is zero indication that he is inclined to curtail his aggressive contempt for the rule of law. To the absolute contrary, there is every indication that the more frustrated Trump gets with legal limitations on his power (provided thus far only by the courts) and the ongoing investigations which may hold him accountable for behavior in which he believes he should be able to engage with impunity, the more hostile he becomes toward our democratic systems, norms, and laws.

Further, the Republican Party not only refuses to address Trump's disloyalty and tyranny; its leadership is still busily carrying water for him, including siding with him against the Justice Department.

4. [CN: Video may autoplay at link] Laura Jarrett, Evan Perez, and Manu Raju at CNN: Ryan Backed Nunes in Spat with Justice Department over Russia Documents, Sources Say.
House Speaker Paul Ryan backed his fellow congressional Republican, House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes, during a meeting over the Russia investigation Wednesday, capping off a months-long dispute between the committee and the Justice Department, multiple sources with the knowledge of the situation told CNN.

...At Wednesday's meeting — initiated at [Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein]'s request — Rosenstein and [FBI director Christopher Wray] tried to gauge where they stood with the House speaker in light of the looming potential contempt of Congress showdown and Nunes' outstanding subpoena demands [regarding a broad range of documents connected to the dossier of compromising allegations about Trump's connections to the Kremlin].

While Ryan had already been in contact with Rosenstein for months about the dispute over documents, Rosenstein and Wray wanted to make one last effort to persuade him to support their position. The documents in dispute were mostly FBI investigative documents that are considered law enforcement sensitive and are rarely released or shared outside the bureau.

During the meeting, however, it became clear that Ryan wasn't moved and the officials wouldn't have his support if they proceeded to resist Nunes' remaining highly classified requests, according to multiple sources with knowledge of the meeting.
All of the above is such a tiny slice of what is happening. It's a few hours of a single day.

We had about a year. That year is almost up.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of a pink couch

Hosted by a pink sofa. Have a seat and chat.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Suggested by Shaker Dreadful Invalid: "Name something that someone has told you about how you come off to others, which surprised you because you don't see it AT ALL."

I'm always surprised when someone imagines that I'm extroverted, especially people who know me in person, because I'm extremely not extroverted. But I think I understand it: Sometimes the fact that I am effervescent (as Iain describes me) with people I like and trust masks the fact that I am by nature very shy.

Just last night, Iain and I were having dinner with friends, whom we know because I met one of them when he answered my call for an Uber. We ended up chatting like old friends for the whole trip, and, uncharacteristically, I asked if we could stay in touch at the end of the ride. Like me, he is gregarious with people he knows, but tends to be very reserved with strangers, especially in group settings.

I observed that if we'd first encountered each other at a party, we might never have become friends, but because we had the good fortune of meeting one-on-one, we now have a friendship that's a year old. Yay!

Open Wide...

Throwback Thursdays

image of me as a baby, lying on my back and looking at something off-camera with a knitted brow
I was dubious right from the fucking start. Just look at that expression!

[Please share your own throwback pix in comments. Just make sure the pix are just of you and/or you have consent to post from other living people in the pic. And please note that they don't have to be pictures from childhood, especially since childhood pix might be difficult for people who come from abusive backgrounds or have transitioned or lots of other reasons. It can be a picture from last week, if that's what works for you. And of course no one should feel obliged to share a picture at all! Only if it's fun!]

Open Wide...

Hard Choices

Shakers, I was faced with a dilemma: Do I write yet another post about how Bill Maher is a despicable piece of shit who loves making rape jokes, or do I post and transcribe an adorable video I just saw of a baby elephant chasing birds? DECISIONS DECISIONS!

J/k baby elephant wins hands down.


Video Description: On a grassy and rocky hillside, on which elephants are chilling alongside spiral-horned antelope and (what I think are) water buffalo, a baby elephant chases an adult antelope, who doesn't appear particularly interested in playing.

The man behind the camera, who we cannot see, laughs. The baby elephant then turns its attention to a group of large grey birds (grouse, I believe), and chases after them. The birds squawk and scatter. The man and an unseen woman laugh.

The baby elephant continues chasing the birds, who playfully dodge the calf, and then whoooooopsy! Baby falls on its face in a highly comedic fashion. The people laugh, with the same affection of a grown-up who sees a baby human take a tumble, as the baby gets up and runs directly to mama for comfort.

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

[Content Note: Sexual assault; objectification; misogyny.]

"He is dressing up crime as art."—Richard Morgan, in a terrific piece about Woody Allen for the Washington Post.

Morgan did something that, according to the staff in the rare-books wing at Princeton University's Firestone Library, he is the first person to do: Read all of Allen's "drafts and scribblings, his psychological and physical cutting-room floor that exists in the 56-box, 57-year personal archives he has been curating" there since 1980.

Of this endeavor, Morgan writes: "I'm the first person to read Allen's collection — the Woody Papers — from cover to cover, and from the very beginning to the very end, Allen, quite simply, drips with repetitious misogyny."

Contrary to what you might reasonably expect, he doesn't approach this subject as though he's the first one to the punch, in the way many men approach subjects like this one. Instead, Morgan made an effort to do something that no other commentator has done, by reading all of Allen's papers, and what he writes here then backs up what (mostly) women, including his victims, have been saying about Allen for a very long time.

I like Morgan's tone here. I appreciate it. There is something nice (for lack of a better word) to me about his clearly being disgusted by all the decades of misogyny he encountered.

It's terribly rare to read a man write on this subject with such obvious contempt.

Morgan, who is himself a survivor of parental abuse and sexual assault, is certainly aware that he will be taken seriously and heard in a way that women have not been on the subject of Woody Allen's abuse. Given that frustrating reality, I am relieved he's not leaving any room for mistaking his position as anything other than one of absolute condemnation.

He is dressing up crime as art.

Yes. He is. And minimizing his crimes by turning them into art, which is cynically defended by seeing him only as the artist and never the criminal.

Open Wide...