Virginia Election: Now No Votes Matter

Yesterday, I brought you the story of the dramatic one-vote win in Virginia's House of Delegates. It was a happy story about how democracy still matters and every vote counts.

Today, it's a story about how the Republicans are killing democracy and everything is terrible.

Naturally, the Republicans, who are both terrible losers and haters of free and fair elections, couldn't tolerate the results of the recount, so they challenged the result in court. And you can guess what happened next.

Jim Morrison, Fenit Nirappil, and Gregory S. Schneider at the Washington Post: Virginia Court Tosses One-Vote Victory That Briefly Ended GOP Majority in House.

Control of Virginia's legislature hung in limbo Wednesday after a three-judge panel declined to certify the recount of a key House race, saying that a questionable ballot should be counted in favor of the Republican and tying a race that Democrats thought they had won by a single vote.

"The court declares there is no winner in this election," Newport News Circuit Court Judge Bryant L. Sugg said after the panel deliberated for more than two hours.

He said that the ballot in question contained a mark for Democrat Shelly Simonds as well as a mark for Republican Del. David Yancey but that the voter had made another mark to strike out Sim­onds's name.
The public was not allowed to get a look at the ballot in question, but reporter Jordan Pascale gave us a rendering:


During the recount, it was counted as a vote for Simonds thrown out as invalid. (Thank you to @Resisterhood for the correction!) Republicans claimed it was a vote for Yancey, and the Court agreed. So now the seat which had gone to Simonds by one vote is instead a tie.

And the mechanism for resolving it is absolutely ludicrous, as Pascale explains:
Politicos, mark your calendars for Wednesday Dec. 27.

That's the day the Virginia Board of Elections will randomly pick the winner of the high stakes and tied 94th House District race.

...The winner will be picked under a procedure that has been used for decades to determine the order of candidates on the ballot each election, Alcorn said.

* Pieces of paper with each candidate's name will be printed and cut to the same size.
* The slips will be placed in old film canisters that the Election Department has on hold.
* Those canisters will go into a bowl and be thoroughly shaken up.
* Then a board member will pick one and that person declared the winner.
That is no way to choose the winner of a democratic contest, no less one in which the control of the state legislature hangs in the balance.

Now, instead of an election in which literally every vote counted, it's turned into an election in which literally none of them will count.

Peak 2017. Sob.

Open Wide...

Here Is Something Nice

image of Hugh Jackman and Deborra-Lee Furness at the beach, taking a selfie
[Image via Hugh Jackman on Instagram.]

Hugh Jackman has always spoken about Deborra-Lee Furness, to whom he's been married for 21 years, in the most charming way. And, in a new interview with People, he's at it again, reminding us that there are still nice things in the world.
The actor opened up about his 21-year marriage to wife Deborra-lee Furness during the latest edition of The Jess Cagle Interview (streaming now on People TV), saying one of the reasons he loves their relationship so much is because they formed their bond before the Wolverine star became famous.

"One of the great pieces of fortune in my career, it started late, but that Deb and I were already set together, a team, madly in love, like literally before it all happened," Jackman tells PEOPLE's editor-in-chief Jess Cagle. "We can kind of see all the ups and downs for what they are. Our priority is our family, and we're there for each other no matter what."

The Greatest Showman actor, 49, says he actively reminds himself that he wouldn't be where he is today without his wife. Calling Furness, 62, his "rock," Jackman says he always makes his wife a priority — no matter what the occasion may be.

"Even at the Oscars, I walk out, I put my hand on my heart and I always look to Deb in the audience," he says. "Straight afterwards, I will not see anybody in my dressing room until Deb's been in. Because that is my foundation, that is the rock, that is the foundation of our family, and therefore my life."

..."Underneath the surface where it's real, and where it's still and where it's deep, that is the love I have with Deb."
Where it's still and where it's deep. This resonates with me strongly.

Open Wide...

Rogue Republicans Conspire to Protect Trump

This is an absolutely extraordinary betrayal — and the leadership of the Republican Party is not going to do a damn thing about it, because their vaunted patriotism is a fucking lie:

A group of House Republicans has gathered secretly for weeks in the Capitol in an effort to build a case that senior leaders of the Justice Department and FBI improperly — and perhaps criminally — mishandled the contents of a dossier that describes alleged ties between President Donald Trump and Russia, according to four people familiar with their plans.

A subset of the Republican members of the House intelligence committee, led by Chairman Devin Nunes of California, has been quietly working parallel to the committee's high-profile inquiry into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election. They haven't informed Democrats about their plans, but they have consulted with the House's general counsel.
That would be the same Devin Nunes who had to "step aside" from the Russia investigation because he completely destroyed his credibility by running interference for the White House during the investigation by the House Intelligence Committee, which he chairs, of Russian election meddling and possible collusion with the Trump campaign.

Nunes was a member of Trump's executive transition committee, and thus should have recused himself from this investigation in the first place. Then he behaved with such egregious partiality, he was forced to remove himself from the investigation. And now he's leading a secret group "to highlight what some committee Republicans see as corruption and conspiracy in the upper ranks of federal law enforcement."
That final product could ultimately be used by Republicans to discredit special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into whether any Trump aides colluded with Russia during the 2016 campaign — or possibly even to justify his dismissal, as some rank-and-file Republicans and Trump allies have demanded. (The president has said he is not currently considering firing Mueller.)

Republicans in the Nunes-led group suspect the FBI and DOJ have worked either to hurt Trump or aid his former campaign rival Hillary Clinton, a sense that has pervaded parts of the president's inner circle. Trump has long called the investigations into whether Russia meddled in the 2016 election a "witch hunt," and on Tuesday, his son Donald Trump Jr. told a crowd in Florida the probes were part of a "rigged system" by "people at the highest levels of government" who were working to hurt the president.

...Nunes' office declined to comment about the effort, but he has aired his suspicions about the law enforcement agencies before.

"I hate to use the word corrupt, but they've become at least so dirty that who's watching the watchmen? Who's investigating these people?" he said in a Fox News interview earlier this month. "There is no one."
That just the Chair of the House Intelligence Committee — who, it turns out, is "investigating these people" — arguing that he is literally above the law.

At this point, it's not just that Republicans in the House and Senate are failing to hold Trump accountable; they are actively working to impede and discredit anyone who is.

Their job is to provide checks and balances on the presidency. It is not to protect the president from consequences of unethical and possibly illegal behavior, which might additionally be treasonous.

That Donald Trump believes he is above the law is vile enough. That the rest of his deplorable party agrees is chilling.

One man does not subvert our democratic norms and systems to usher in authoritarianism on his own. He has help, and lots of it. The Republican Party is willing, even eager, to provide all the help that Trump needs.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of a yellow couch

Hosted by a yellow sofa. Have a seat and chat.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Before making a telephone call, do you ever rehearse what you are going to say? Why?

LOL YES! Because I am a stutterer and an awkward weirdo, so planning out what I'm going to say in all different types of conversations, on the telephone or otherwise, helps me to be slightly less goofy. Sometimes. Hahaha.

[Got an idea for a Question of the Day? Suggest it here!]

Open Wide...

The Wednesday Blogaround

This blogaround brought to you by snowflakes.

Recommended Reading:

Jason Fagone: The Most Awesome Codebreaker in World War II Was a Woman

(In case you missed my Q&A with Jason, check it out here!)

Shay Stewart-Bouley: [Content Note: White supremacy] Let's Talk Racism and Next Steps

Fannie Wolfe: [CN: Internet abuse/harassment] You Are Doing Emotional and Human Labor for Your Fave Social Media Sites

Maddie Stone: [CN: Spoilers for The Last Jedi] The Amazing Earth Science Behind The Last Jedi's New Mineral World

Vivian Kane: [CN: Racism; classism; disablism; misogyny; fat hatred] No Really, How Does Film Critic/Human Train Wreck Rex Reed Still Have a Job?

The Shameful Narcissist: Games of Christmas Past

Monica Roberts: Only Eight Weeks to the Black Panther Debut!

Leave your links and recommendations in comments. Self-promotion welcome and encouraged!

Open Wide...

Glenn Thrush Will Not Be Fired by New York Times

[Content Note: Sexual harassment/assault.]

A month after Laura McGann first reported that New York Times reporter Glenn Thrush had hit on at least four young female colleagues, groped and tried to kiss them, and spread damaging rumors about them in retaliation for refusing his sexual advances, the Times has completed its internal investigation and found that Thrush "acted offensively" but not so offensively that he should lose his job over it.

Instead, he will be suspended for two months and then moved to a different department.

In a statement, Mr. Baquet said the company had completed its inquiry and found that Mr. Thrush had "behaved in ways that we do not condone."

"While we believe that Glenn has acted offensively, we have decided that he does not deserve to be fired," Mr. Baquet said.

Mr. Baquet also said Mr. Thrush was undergoing counseling and substance abuse rehabilitation on his own and that he would receive training "to improve his workplace conduct."

"We understand that our colleagues and the public at large are grappling with what constitutes sexually offensive behavior in the workplace and what consequences are appropriate," Mr. Baquet added. "Each case has to be evaluated based on individual circumstances. We believe this is an appropriate response to Glenn's situation."
No, it isn't. It's a terribly inappropriate response.


Not only are the consequences woefully insufficient, but Baquet's insistence on soft-pedaling Thrush's sexual harassment and assault as "sexually offensive behavior in the workplace" is grossly misrepresentative, given that, in one instance, he literally pursued one female colleague through the streets after drinks at a bar until she burst into tears.

And, as my friend Erica Barnett notes, the Times has decided to foist Thrush "on a different set of women" by merely moving him to a different department.

Women shouldn't be obliged to pay the price for this man to keep his career. For fuck's sake.

Open Wide...

Warner to Speak About Mueller


I have no idea what this will be about, but here's a thread, in case it's a biggie. Or in case it's not. Ugh.

Open Wide...

"Celestial Driftwood"

an artist's rendering of 'Oumuamua, a 'cigar-shaped' asteroid
Artist's rendering of 'Oumuamua by M. Kornmesser, care of the ESO.

I love this article by Nicole Mortillaro for the CBC about 'Oumuamua, the "bizarrely shaped" interstellar asteroid "ejected from another stellar system, just passing through ours."

Mortillaro, who is the CBC's Senior Science and Technology Writer, writes in a way that makes her subject eminently accessible to the average reader, and right in her bio is something that strongly resonates with me: "As an amateur astronomer, Nicole can be found looking up at the night sky appreciating the marvels of our universe."

This piece is particularly great, and includes a terrific interview with Michele Bannister of Queen's University Belfast, who's the lead author of a new study about 'Oumuamua (which means "messenger from afar who arrived here first" in Hawaiian).
'Oumuamua, which is about 400 metres long and 40 metres wide, raises many questions Bannister would love to answer.

"I would like to know what its home star system looked like," she said. "I want another one. I want to know this object isn't unusual. Is it statistically a reasonable example of what we expect to see wandering the cosmos?"

...When 'Oumuamua was first discovered, astronomers believed it was likely a comet. That's because as stellar systems form, most of the objects thrown into space are comets, leftover bits made up of water and dust. Asteroids, on the other hand, are mostly rocky remnants and much less common.

But as 'Oumuamua neared the sun, the familiar tail that comets produce didn't appear, an indication that it's mostly rock.

As 'Oumuamua makes its way out of the solar system at roughly 38 kilometres a second, tumbling from end to end, researchers still aren't sure exactly where it came from.

"It moves like a piece of driftwood on the tide," Bannister said. "It's really celestial driftwood."
LOVE.

Scientists are also pointing lots of instruments at 'Oumuamua, to see if they detect anything, just in case it turns out to be an alien aircraft.

And why not? Especially with stuff like this in the news!


Geez, what I wouldn't give to have Hillary Clinton as president, opening up government files on the subject of unexplained aerial phenomena, and being super competent and decent so I had plenty of time to write and think about space coolness instead of panicking 23 hours of every day about what Donald Trump and the Republican Party will do to destroy us next.

Which reminds me... I have lots of burning questions about 'Oumuamua, but none as urgent as this: Can I hitch a ride?

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Sophie the Torbie Cat sitting on the dining room table, looking intently out the window
"One day, you will be mine, birds. One day, you will be mine."

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 335

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Here are some things in the news today:

Earlier today by me: Thieves Came in the Night.

So, here's where we are: The GOP doesn't care at all about passing a historically unpopular piece of legislation, right after losing a Senate seat in Alabama and control of the Virginia legislature. They are truly governing like they know they will never face voters in free and fair elections again.

And Mike Pence's "prayer" for Trump sounded like a benediction or a eulogy. They don't care if he goes. The coup is well under way, and Pence is ready to step in and play pretend (small-d) democratic president while actually being a vicious, aggressive autocrat.

The $1.5 trillion the GOP and their donor class is stealing with this bill will be used to enact austerity programs that will turn this country into a Social Darwinian hellscape. Good luck to all of us finding ways to organize dissent now that Net Neutrality is no more.

And meanwhile our foreign policy is a garbage disaster: We've got no functional diplomatic system anymore; the president is a reckless provocateur; and the Republican Party is a bunch of sickening traitors who don't give a fuck that Russia continues to meddle in our business and subvert our democracy, and will probably mount a major attack on our infrastructure in the near future.

And I don't know how we're going to mount a meaningful resistance to this onslaught, but I will promise you that I'll be here resisting as mightily as I can for as long as I'm able.

Anyway...

Casey Quinlan at ThinkProgress: The GOP Tax Bill Hurts K-12 Schools and the Quality of Higher Education. "Experts on K-12 and higher education policy say the tax bill is a giveaway to corporations and could hamper public investment in K-12 schools and public universities. The finally bill doesn't include a change to teacher tax deductions — which was eliminated in a House bill last month — so teachers can still deduct $250 for supplies they buy out of their own pockets. The provision on a tax on tuition waivers for graduate students was also removed. But the overall picture for students is grim, said Ben Miller, senior director for Postsecondary Education at the Center for American Progress. 'You're definitely seeing folks breathe a sigh of relief because these narrow provisions are gone,' Miller said. 'But it's like saying, 'Thank god my paper cut healed while someone cut off my arm.' The long-term damage of the overall bill is quite bad.'"

Akiba Solomon at Colorlines: Patrisse Cullors Discusses How the Tax Bill May Impact the Reproductive Health of Women of Color, Particularly Black Women. "Paul Ryan has blatantly said that he will make cuts to entitlements after the tax bill passes. This tax bill will add more than a trillion dollars to the national deficit, and we can guess that they're going to use that to justify these cuts to entitlements. We know that the first thing to cut — by both parties — are programs for poor and working class people, particularly those [identified with] people of color. So the first cuts will likely be from programs like Medicaid, Medicare, and SNAP. Women's reproductive health care will be among the first to be cut."


Sarah O'Brien at CNBC: These Changes Under the GOP Tax Plan Affect Homeowners. "After the many twists and turns that the Republican tax-overhaul legislation has taken thus far, it might be unclear to homeowners what's in store for them. In a nutshell, not much that will help them save more on taxes. ...On top of making modifications to the mortgage interest deduction, the bill limits the deductibility of property taxes and state and local income taxes to a combined $10,000. In states such as New York and California where home prices and property taxes are high, this change means some homeowners could face bigger tax bills beginning next year. And if you were thinking about prepaying some of your 2018 state and local income taxes to take advantage of current law, which is more generous, forget about it. The bill specifically disallows it."

Tim Fernholz at Quartz: The GOP Tax Bill Is a Massive Victory for Globalization. "Critics, even those who favor lower corporate rates, fear this bill will increase existing incentives for companies to employ tax havens. Under the new law, companies pay a minimum tax on global income, designed to prevent them from shifting intellectual property (and profits) to low-tax jurisdictions overseas. But the hastily written new rules create a loophole for companies to skirt that minimum tax by investing in factories and other routine operations outside the United States. ...Even if the loopholes can be fixed, many experts expect the move to empower multinationals to demand new tax concessions in other jurisdictions, driving a global race to the bottom."

Will Wilkinson at the New York Times: The Tax Bill Shows the G.O.P.'s Contempt for Democracy. "[T]he open contempt for democracy displayed in the Senate's slapdash rush to pass the tax bill ought to trouble us as much as, if not more than, what's in it. In its great haste, the 'world's greatest deliberative body' held no hearings or debate on tax reform. The Senate's Republicans made sloppy math mistakes, crossed out and rewrote whole sections of the bill by hand at the 11th hour, and forced a vote on it before anyone could conceivably read it. ...At a time when America's faith in democracy is flagging, the Republicans elected to treat the United States Senate, and the citizens it represents, with all the respect college guys accord public restrooms."

* * *

[Content Note: Sexual assault; child abuse. Covers entire section.]

Jason Wilson at the Guardian: The Texas Boys Were Beaten, Abused, Raped; Now All They Want Is an Apology. "Rick, Steve, and six other men the Guardian spoke to named staff members responsible for the abuse, which lasted from the 1950s until at least the early 1990s. They say the abuse went beyond them, and was systemic, affecting hundreds of others who went through the ranch. They say Lamont Waldrip, a long-serving superintendent, was one of the worst abusers. Last month, at the behest of a wealthy donor who wrote a cheque for $1m to build a new dormitory, the ranch named the new building Waldrip House. ...For the survivors who want to make the ranch accountable for the abuse — and have been encouraged to break their silence after Steve Smith brought them together in a Facebook group — this is an unbearable affront."

Dawn C. Chmielewski at Deadline: Gary Goddard Accused of Sexual Misconduct by 8 Former Child Actors. "Eight former child actors from a Santa Barbara theater group have come forward to accuse their former mentor, Broadway producer and theme park designer Gary Goddard, of molestation or attempted molestation in the 1970s. Since actor Anthony Edwards wrote a painful first-person account of his abuse on Medium, describing how Goddard allegedly preyed on him and other young aspiring actors in the theater troupe, others have came forward to support his account, including Mark Driscoll and Bret Nighman. A total of eight people described Goddard's advances — straying hands on thighs, fondling on darkened Disneyland rides, sexual abuse during overnight stays — and the psychological aftermath."

Melanie Schmitz at ThinkProgress: Paul Ryan Was Asked If Trump's Accusers Are Liars; His Response Was Abysmal. "'Look, I don't even know what all these accusations are,' Ryan said, when asked whether he agreed with the White House's claim that all the women were liars. 'I'm focused on fixing Congress. I'm focused on my job, where I work, making this institution safe. I want my daughter to be able to grow up in an economy, to go into work — public or private sector work — she's not being harassed, she's being empowered. That's what I'm focused on, I'm not focused on this other stuff.'" There's more at the link, and it's just as shitty.

* * *

Ed O'Keefe at the Washington Post: Democrats Unlikely to Force DACA Vote This Week, Probably Averting Shutdown.
Democrats are backing away from a pledge to force a vote this month over the fate of thousands of undocumented immigrants brought to this country as children, angering activists but probably averting the threat of a government shutdown at a critical moment in spending negotiations with Republicans and President Trump.

With a deadline of midnight Friday to pass spending legislation, dozens of Democrats had vowed to withhold support if Republicans refused to allow a vote on a measure, known as the Dream Act, that would allow roughly 1.2 million immigrants to stay legally in the United States.

But a group of vulnerable Democratic senators facing reelection in conservative states next year aren't willing to go that far — meaning the party is unlikely to muster the votes to block the spending bill.

"We've got to get it done, but I'm not drawing a line in the sand that it has to be this week versus two weeks from now," said Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), who faces reelection next year in a state that Trump won by more than 18 points. Other Democrats facing similar head winds echoed that sentiment, including Sens. Joe Manchin III (D-W.Va.) and Joe Donnelly (D-Ind.). Trump won those states by 42 and 19 percentage points, respectively.
Okay, but the point of it being this week is that the threat of a shutdown provided immense leverage to Democrats, who are the minority party. In a week when the Republicans can put aside all their differences to universally pass their grotesque tax bill, Democrats should be more inclined than ever to do the same to protect millions of the nation's most vulnerable members. Fuck this.

Bob Dreyfuss at the Nation: Maxine Waters Connects the Dots on Trump, Deutsche Bank, and Russia. "For Waters, and perhaps for Mueller, too, the question is: Are these two things related? Did Trump, Kushner, and their partners — along with others in Trump World, including Paul Manafort, Gen. Michael Flynn, and Wilbur Ross, the billionaire who serves as Trump's commerce secretary — benefit from illegal Russian money that flowed through Deutsche Bank? If so, does [Donald] Trump have a hidden obligation to Russia or to Russian oligarchs? And why did the official US investigation of Deutsche Bank's illegal transactions, conducted under the auspices of Jeff Sessions's Justice Department, go 'dormant' earlier this year? Those questions are especially relevant because of two major, recent transactions between Deutsche Bank, Trump, and Kushner."

Peter Beaumont at the Guardian: U.S. Will 'Take Names of Those Who Vote to Reject Jerusalem Recognition'. "The U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, Nikki Haley, has warned UN members she will be 'taking names' of countries that vote to reject Donald Trump's recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. In a letter seen by the Guardian, Haley told countries — including European delegations — that she will report back to the US president with the names of those who support a draft resolution rejecting the US move at the UN general assembly on Thursday, adding that Trump took the issue personally. Haley writes: 'As you consider your vote, I encourage you to know the president and the U.S. take this vote personally. The president will be watching this vote carefully and has requested I report back on those who voted against us,' she continued."

Jonathan Capehart at the Washington Post: 'Trump's Benghazi': Frederica Wilson Wants the Truth About What Happened to La David Johnson in Niger. "'The American people need to know what happened to Sgt. La David Johnson. And I think that his family needs to know what happened to Sgt. La David Johnson.' Two months after Johnson was killed during a mission in Niger, Rep. Frederica Wilson (D-Fla.) still has questions. 'It's sort of like a coverup,' she said in the latest episode of 'Cape Up.' 'And from the very beginning, I was calling it 'Mr. Trump's Benghazi.'' This episode with Wilson comes just before Johnson's mother complained about not being properly briefed by the Pentagon during a CNN interview on Monday. Wilson told me the family is being given information 'that's not matching' information being reported in the press, which has led to many questions."


[CN: Trans hatred; child abuse] Amy Littlefield at Rewire: 'Medical Malpractice': Catholic Bishops Urge Parents, Doctors to Withhold Care for Transgender Kids.
Acceptance can be a matter of life and death for transgender people. When they are accepted by their families, trans people are less likely to face a range of negative experiences, including attempting suicide. That hasn't stopped the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and other religious leaders from issuing an open letter that effectively encourages parents to reject their transgender children, and deny them access to gender-affirming care.

The letter, entitled "Created Male and Female: An Open Letter from Religious Leaders," denies the existence of transgender people, claiming that "human beings are male or female and that the socio-cultural reality of gender cannot be separated from one's sex as male or female."

It appears to urge medical institutions to withhold gender-affirming care for children.

"Children especially are harmed when they are told that they can 'change' their sex or, further, given hormones that will affect their development and possibly render them infertile as adults," the letter claims. "Parents deserve better guidance on these important decisions, and we urge our medical institutions to honor the basic medical principle of 'first, do no harm.'"

Harper Jean Tobin, director of policy for the National Center for Transgender Equality, criticized the intrusion of religious judgment in medical care.

"They are urging parents and medical providers to withhold affirming psychological and medical care and to put off limits even the consideration of affirming psychological or medical care," Tobin told Rewire. "That is medical malpractice."
Samantha Cooney at Time: Model Lauren Wasser Faces Another Leg Amputation Because of Toxic Shock Syndrome. "Model Lauren Wasser will likely lose both of her legs to toxic shock syndrome — and she wants other women to be more aware of what they're putting in their bodies. ...Now, the model is advocating for legislation, introduced in May by Democratic Rep. Carolyn Maloney, that will require the National Institutes of Health to conduct or support research to determine the safety of ingredients in feminine hygiene products. ...New York University microbiology professor Philip Tierno told TIME last year that there's little scientific research on the health risks related to tampon use." Because misogyny.

Sarah Roberts, Ashish Premkumar, and Monica McLemore at Rewire: The CDC's Language Ban Is More Than an Attack on Words — It's an Attack on Basic Public Health Values. "Last Friday, the Washington Post reported that senior members of the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) counseled analysts to avoid using seven words in future budget and supporting documents that would be disseminated to CDC partners and to Congress: 'evidence-based,' 'science-based,' 'vulnerable,' 'entitlement,' 'diversity,' 'transgender,' and 'fetus.' Two days later, CDC Director Brenda Fitzgerald and a spokesperson from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) — which oversees the CDC — both argued that no bans on words existed and that the entire story was a 'mischaracterization of discussions regarding the budget formulation process.' Despite the seeming about-face from both the HHS and CDC, the concern among the medical and public health community still remains..."

In a terrific act of resistance... Andy Towle at Towleroad: Human Rights Campaign Projects CDC's Banned Word List on Facade of Trump Hotel. LOL ROCK THE FUCK ON.


I'm gonna end it on a high note!

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

The What Happened Book Club

image of Hillary Clinton's book 'What Happened' sitting on my dining room table, with my Hillary action figure standing on top of the book, her arms raised over her head

This is the tenth installment of the What Happened Book Club, where we are doing a chapter a week.

That pace will hopefully allow people who need time to procure the book a better chance to catch up, and let us deal with the book in manageable pieces: I figured we will have a lot to talk about, and one thread for the entire book would quickly get overwhelming.

So! Let us continue our discussion with Chapter Ten: Sweating the Details.

* * *

This is the chapter in which Hillary Clinton talks about being a policy wonk. It is a chapter that speaks to the heart of this earnest girl, who appreciates that Hillary is earnest AF; that she does her homework; that she tells the truth, even when it isn't popular; that she is committed to the long slog of progress.

This chapter means a lot to me, for a lot of reasons.

It is the chapter in which Hillary discusses Matt Lauer and the Commander in Chief Forum, and how that farce was emblematic of the coverage in a campaign where optics were prioritized over policy.

It is also the chapter in which Hillary discusses running against Bernie Sanders in the primary, and how she often felt like she was wearing a straitjacket, because criticizing his expansive plans for being totally unfeasible opened her up to cynical criticisms that she wasn't progressive enough (or at all).

She also describes in this chapter her frustration with Sanders for his utter lack of intersectional analysis:
It was beyond frustrating that Bernie acted as if he had a monopoly on political purity and that he had set himself up as the sole arbiter of what it meant to be progressive, despite giving short shrift to important issues such as immigration, reproductive rights, racial justice, and gun safety. I believed we could and should fight hard for more equal economic opportunities and greater social justice. They go hand in hand, and it's wrong to sacrifice the latter in the name of the former.
Indeed.

But as frustrated as she was with Bernie, she notes that Donald Trump was, of course, far worse. And the press, who had abandoned all pretense of policy discussion, never held Trump to account for his appalling and dangerous lack of policy knowledge.
Donald Trump didn't care about policy at all. He seemed proud of his ignorance and didn't even pretend to come up with plans for how he'd build his wall, fix health care, bring back all the lost jobs in manufacturing and coal mining, and defeat ISIS. It was like he'd just wave a magic wand. He ridiculed me for taking the job seriously. "She's got people that sit in cubicles writing policy all day," he told Time magazine. "It's just a waste of paper."

I kept waiting for reporters and voters to challenge him on his empty, deceitful promises. In previous elections, there was always a moment of reckoning when candidates had to show they were serious and their plans were credible. Not this time. Most of the press was too busy chasing ratings and scandals, and Trump was too slippery to be pinned down. He understood the need and impulses of the political press well enough [to know] that if he gave them a new rabbit every day, they'd never catch any of them. So his reckoning never came.
A strategy which has, I don't need to tell you, continued throughout the first year of his presidency. There is so much chaos, so much corruption, so much incompetence, that nothing ever has time to fully register before it's on to the next.

Which is by design. Note that Hillary is not operating under any misapprehensions about whether Trump just bumbles his way through or is a savvy orchestrator of this deliberate mess. She knows. It's no accident.

Hillary wraps up the chapter lamenting how very different her presidency would have been, specifically because of her interest in policy. "A haunting line from the nineteenth-century poet John Greenleaf Whittier comes to mind," she writes, then quotes Whittier: "For all sad words of tongue and pen, the saddest are these: 'It might have been.'"

Blub.

Open Wide...

Every. Vote. Matters.

Yesterday, a dramatic scene was quietly unfolding in Virginia's House of Delegates. A recount was taking place, with votes publicly tallied on a whiteboard, to determine who won the seat: Republican incumbent David Yancey, or Democratic challenger Shelly Simonds — who only entered the race in August after another candidate had to drop out.

Control of the Virginia legislature, which has been held for 17 years by the GOP, hung in the balance.

And, in the end, Simonds won. By a single vote.


[Image embedded in tweet shows the front page of the Daily Press, featuring an image of Shelly Simonds smiling widely and David Yancey looking decidedly more grim, accompanied by large text reading "11,608-11,607" and smaller text reading "Every vote counted — and recounted: Democrat Shelly Simonds takes the 94th District by just one vote over incumbent Yancey."]

The Republicans still retain a small advantage in the state senate, 21-19. But the Democratic lieutenant governor, Ralph Northam, is the tiebreaker in the Senate, and Democratic Governor Terry McAuliffe has veto power. Which will inevitably stymie an extremely conservative agenda. That makes this a big win for Virginia progressives!

Yancey held a lead of 10 votes going into the recount, but there was a dramatic reversal "after a painstaking counting overseen by local elections officials and the clerk of court."
Even election officials who had spent the day keeping order seemed rattled by the fact that such a momentous race could be settled in such dramatic fashion.

The adage about how every vote counts is true, said Newport News Electoral Board Chairman Sean Devlin as he announced the official result. "Please make sure to stress that," he said to the gathered reporters.
Love.

Although this story virtually tells itself.

11,608-11,607.

Wow.
"I knew it was going to be a roller-coaster ride, and the counts were going to change and votes were going to shift around. But I had faith in the system and final outcome," said Simonds, who stayed off Twitter to avoid anxiety. "This is part of a huge wave election in Virginia where voters came out in record numbers to force a change in Virginia, and I'm really proud to be part of that change."
Congratulations, Shelly Simonds! Congratulations, Virginian Democrats!

Open Wide...

Thieves Came in the Night

In the middle of the night, Senate Republicans passed the heinous tax bill, which is a giant wealth redistrubution upwards plan that steals from the poor to give to the rich to the tune of $1.5 trillion:

The final vote was 51 to 48, with every Senate Democratic voting against it, and every Senate Republican voting for it. The exception was Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), who missed the vote for health reasons, but who nevertheless endorsed the far-right tax package.

The bill will now head back to the House, which thought it had passed the bill yesterday afternoon, but which will have to vote again today for procedural reasons. (The two versions have to be identical, and the parliamentarian rejected a pair of measures from the bill before the Senate vote.)

Passage, however, is assured. The House easily passed the partisan plan yesterday, and there's nothing to suggest 10 House Republicans will change their mind by this afternoon.
Once the House passes it again, it will go to Donald Trump's desk for signature, and he will sign it, flanked by a sinisterly grinning Mike Pence and a cadre of other white men dewy with the glow of marauding.

Their photo will be taken, marking forever the moment of their prideful plunder, and we will remember their faces and names when the reckoning comes due.

If they haven't stolen that, too.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of a red couch

Hosted by a red sofa. Have a seat and chat.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

If you could wake up tomorrow having gained any one quality or ability, what would it be?

I would love to wake up tomorrow being able to speak and/or read every language in the world.

[Got an idea for a Question of the Day? Suggest it here!]

Open Wide...

Tax Scam Bill Passes House; Now Goes to Senate

Earlier today, the giant clusterfucktastrophe that is the Republican tax bill passed the House. It now goes to the Senate for their vote.

If it passes the Senate, it will go to Donald Trump's desk for signature.

BUT! That is not yet a sure thing.


KEEP CALLING. Keep resisting with all you've got. It isn't over 'til it's over.

Here's a thread for discussion about whatever happens tonight.

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

[Content Note: Nazism.]

"Kind, good, happy, gentlemanly, secure people never go Nazi. They may be the gentle philosopher whose name is in the Blue Book, or Bill from City College to whom democracy gave a chance to design airplanes — you'll never make Nazis out of them. But the frustrated and humiliated intellectual, the rich and scared speculator, the spoiled son, the labor tyrant, the fellow who has achieved success by smelling out the wind of success — they would all go Nazi in a crisis. Believe me, nice people don't go Nazi. Their race, color, creed, or social condition is not the criterion. It is something in them."—Dorothy Thompson, in an essay for Harper's Magazine, "Who Goes Nazi?," published August 1941.

Open Wide...

Discussion Thread: Holiday Dread

[Content Note for Christian Supremacy, privilege, and various dysfunctional family dynamics and abuse, covering the entirety of the thread.]

image of kyriarchetypical white family at Christmas
Does your family look like this? Mine, neither.

It's the most wonderful time of the year. Except for when it's not. And if you aren't happily preparing to celebrate the most perfect Christmas with your perfect family, it can feel pretty lonely — mostly because there aren't a whole lot of places where it's acceptable to talk about your holiday anxiety, or sadness, or contempt, without disguising it as some kind of joke. There aren't a whole lot of places where it's okay to have a grown-up conversation about how genuinely hard the holidays can be.

So, here's a thread to do that. Whether you're facing time with a dysfunctional family of origin, facing time alone you'd prefer to be sharing with someone else, exhausted even contemplating the travel ahead, sad because you can't afford a gift you'd really like to get your kid, pissed off because you don't celebrate Christmas and OMFG enough with the Christmas shit, dreading the comments about your body, your ideology, your choice of partner, dreading your dad's sexist jokes or your mom's racist jokes, dreading seeing that uncle who should be in jail, dreading having your parenting skills audited, dreading coming out which you are totally doing this year, or just generally fed up with the holidays, go for it.

(If you are having urgent thoughts of self-harm, do not leave a comment; please contact emergency services immediately.)

And if you are undilutedly joyful about the holiday season, can't wait to see your family, and are walking on a cloud of sparking white snowflakes, enjoy the absolute fuck out of it. That's not snark; I mean it. That is a rare and precious gift, worth lingering moments of conscious appreciation.

As always, please don't offer advice, unless it is explicitly solicited. Sometimes people just need to grouse, and need solidarity rather than the offer of solutions they may well have already tried.

[Image via.]

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Zelda the Black and Tan Mutt lying on the couch, looking at me with big, sleepy brown eyes

Just look at this dog. Look at her big, sleepy brown eyes, and her adorable dogbrows, and her kissable nose, and her silly wee ears, and her velvety muzzle, and her snuggly cuteness. She is so ridiculously wonderful, I can't even deal with it! I love her with infinite hearts.

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...