Ryan Lizza Out for "Improper Sexual Conduct"

Ryan Lizza is a political reporter for the New Yorker, whose visibility and platform afforded him outsized influence over how the 2016 election was perceived by the electorate.


In case you aren't able to read the embedded screencap, the full statement reads: "The New Yorker recently learned that Ryan Lizza engaged in what we believe was improper sexual conduct. We have reviewed the matter and, as a result, have severed ties with Lizza. Due to a request for privacy, we are not commenting further."

CNN, where Lizza is regularly featured as a commentator, quickly cut ties with Lizza, too — at least while they investigate.

Lizza himself issued a statement reading in its entirety: "I am dismayed that The New Yorker has decided to characterize a respectful relationship with a woman I dated as somehow inappropriate. The New Yorker was unable to cite any company policy that was violated. I am sorry to my friends, workplace colleagues, and loved ones for any embarassment this episode may cause. I love The New Yorker, my home for the last decade, and I have the highest regard for the people who work there. But this decision, which was made hastily and without a full investigation of the relevant facts, was a terrible mistake."

So, I'll just point out that the New Yorker's statement did not disclose any details that would have allowed potential identification of the person to whom Lizza had demonstrated "improper sexual conduct," but Lizza immediately identified her as someone he dated, thus exposing her — to some degree, and at minimum to their circle — without her consent.

It's hard not to read that as at attempt at intimidation to silence her.

That is fucked-up, abuser behavior.

Open Wide...

On "Cat Person"

[Content Note: Rape culture; misogyny; fat hatred.]

There is a remarkable piece of short fiction just published at the New Yorker called "Cat Person." A lot of people are talking about it, and understandably so: It is beautifully written by its author, Kristen Roupenian.

Which is not to say I loved everything about it, but her writing is exquisite.

The short story is, broadly, about a 20-year-old female college student who has a sexual encounter with an older man she meets while working at a movie theater. But is about much more than that, too. It's also about modern dating, and technology, and safety, and consent, and how well we can ever know other people — and ourselves.

There is an interview with Roupenian about her story here, which is also very good.

This is a thread to discuss the story and the interview, if you are so inclined, and also the public conversation around the story, which I've also found very interesting.

Three things about that conversation that have particularly struck me [minor spoiler in #3]:

1. Margot, the young woman at the center of the story, will feel familiar to lots of women. (Her experience is not universal, but it isn't purported to be.) It's fascinating how many men seem bothered, even angry, about that. But for entirely the wrong reasons.

2. I'm not the least bit surprised that I've seen virtually no discussion of the fat hatred that permeates the story. I've seen a lot of reasons why I'm supposed to hate Margot, and not a single one of them mentions that she's a rank fat hater.

3. I did, however, see a lot of criticisms of her for being selfish and vain and various other standards that are used against young women. My thoughts about that were perfectly and succinctly summed by Nat in this tweet:


Yeah. Especially that second point. Yeah.

Discuss.

Open Wide...

Fundraising Reminder

image of a white piggy bank wearing black glasses accompanied by text reading: 'Shakesville End-of-Year Fundraiser'

In case you missed it, on Friday I posted Shakesville's End-of-Year Fundraiser. There is more information at the link, but the basic gist is this: If you value my work here and/or on Twitter, please remember that Shakesville is run exclusively on donations. I need your support, if you are able to chip in.

Thank you so much to everyone who has already donated and/or set up (or increased) a subscription. I am so appreciative.

I think I have sent a thank-you note to everyone, although I did get two bouncebacks and it's entirely possible I inadvertently missed someone because my inbox is the Upside Down. If you haven't received a personal thank-you, and you would like one, please let me know, and I will make sure to send one!

This will be one of a couple reminders I run over the next couple of weeks, and then we'll go back to every other month reminders.

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

series of images of Olivia the White Farm Cat: 1. Sitting at my feet looking up at me. 2. Jumping up and reaching toward me. 3. Looking content while I scratch her head.
Guess who got her stitches out this weekend? No more sleeve shirt!

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 326

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Here are some things in the news today:

Earlier today by me: Explosion at the Port Authority in NYC; Bernie Sanders, What Are You Even Doing?; and Celebrity Chef Mario Batali "Stepping Away" Following Sexual Harassment Allegations.

[Content Note: Sexual harassment and/or assault. Covers entire section.]

Addy Baird at ThinkProgress: 'What a Pervert He Is': Trump's Accusers Provide New Details of Sexual Harassment. "Trump called Jessica Leeds a 'cunt' after allegedly groping her on an airplane in the late 1970's, Leeds said on Megyn Kelly Today Monday morning. ...Leeds joined Kelly Monday morning along with two other women, Samantha Holvey and Rachel Crooks, who have accused Trump of sexual misconduct. Crooks says Trump forcibly kissed her in Trump Tower in 2005, and Holvey says Trump 'inspected' her and other Miss USA pageant contestants, calling the interaction 'the dirtiest I felt in my entire life.' In total, 16 women have accused Trump of sexual misconduct. The president has denied all accusations."

Mark Berman at the Washington Post: Trump Accusers Say It Was 'Heartbreaking' to See Him Elected Despite Sexual Misconduct Allegations. "At a news conference with the other two women later Monday morning, Crooks called for Congress to investigate the allegations of sexual misconduct against the president. Leeds said that none of the women were speaking publicly for fame, but instead were doing it because they felt it was the right thing to do. 'None of us want this attention,' Leeds said at the news conference. 'None of us are comfortable with it... But this is important, so when asked, we speak out.' ...Holvey suggested it made sense for Trump's accusers to speak to the public again given the way the country's atmosphere — and response to alleged sexual misconduct — has shifted over the last year. 'Let's try round two,' she said. 'The environment's different; let's try again.'"

[CN: Video may autoplay at link] Aileen Graef at CNN: Two Senators Call for Trump's Resignation over Sexual Assault, Harassment Allegations.
Sens. Cory Booker and Jeff Merkley both voiced the sentiment.

In an interview with Vice after a campaign rally for Democratic Alabama Senate candidate Doug Jones, Booker said, "I just watched Sen. Al Franken do the honorable thing and resign from his office. My question is, why isn't Donald Trump doing the same thing — who has more serious allegations against him, with more women who have come forward. The fact pattern on him is far more damning than the fact pattern on Al Franken."

...Merkley joined the call in an email fundraising pitch.

"I want to be absolutely clear. Donald Trump should resign the presidency. At least 17 women have accused Donald Trump of horrific sexual misconduct, and I believe them. Moreover, he's bragged on tape about that behavior. This is not about politics. This is not about policy. I disagree with him on many things, but this is not about that," he said in the email.
I really don't appreciate Booker engaging in abuse ranking between Franken and Trump, and I don't think it's "honorable" to resign from a position of power because you've abused it. But he's right that Trump should resign. For this and many other reasons.

Kathryn Rossetter at the Hollywood Reporter: New Dustin Hoffman Accuser Claims Harassment and Physical Violation on Broadway. "I considered reporting him to Actors Equity. But I was cautioned by some respected theatre professionals that if I did, I would probably lose my job and, because he was such a powerful star, any hope of a career. It was Dustin's playpen." This account is absolutely harrowing. Rossetter suffered daily sexual abuse and humiliation. And Hoffman had the fucking temerity to whine about being confronted by John Oliver. What a sick asshole.

David Ng at Towleroad: CAA Agent Accused of Offering Sex in Exchange for Access to Directors and a Hollywood Star. "The agent, Cade Hudson, made the offers in 2013, according to text messages reviewed by The Times, as well as interviews with the recipient of the messages, actor Sean Rose. The texts show that Hudson offered to perform oral sex on Rose and solicited the actor for as much as $1,000, even though he was told the actor was heterosexual. Rose said he declined the offers and was 'embarrassed and humiliated.' But he said he felt powerless to speak out and feared that doing so would result in professional reprisals. 'Because he knew so many people in the industry, I felt there wasn't anything I could do about it,' the actor said."

Kaiser at Celebitchy: Paz de la Huerta's Therapy Sessions Are Being Used Against Her in Her Rape Case.
In the middle of the Predator Storm, Paz de la Huerta shared her story. Paz told Vanity Fair that Harvey Weinstein had raped her twice in her own apartment in 2010 — the acts of rape were months apart, but in the same calendar year. Paz's story garnered a lot of sympathy and interest for many reasons, one of which is that her story was one of the most recent chronologically in the decades of Harvey Weinstein's predations.

Paz went to the New York police to give a statement, and it was said the NYPD were investigating her story. It was said that the cops were hopeful that Paz's case would be the most prosecutable, because 2010 doesn't fall outside of the statute of limitations on sex crimes. But because this is Peak 2017 and every woman has to go through a mountain of bullsh-t, sources now tell TMZ that cops are no longer hopeful that charges will ever be brought against Weinstein in Paz's case.

...[TMZ reports in part:] "De la Huerta has said she told her therapist about the rapes, but our law enforcement sources say it's not as clear as that. Law enforcement is aware of a correspondence in which the therapist recollects the 2010 session this way: 'I recall you reporting to me a sexual encounter with Harvey Weinstein involving intercourse in your apartment in 2010 that resulted in you feeling victimized. I recall you telling me that it felt coercive to you and that you didn't want to have sex with him, but felt you had to as he was a man of power and rank and you couldn't say no to his sexual advances.'"
I have so many questions about this. Like, since when does believing one cannot say no not constitute coercion? And like, who the fuck in law enforcement is giving TMZ de la Huerta's therapist's notes so that they can be published?! Fucking hell, this is infuriating. Goddammit.

* * *

Carol E. Lee and Julia Ainsley at NBC News: Focus on Flynn, Trump Timeline Suggests Obstruction Is on Mueller's Mind. "Special counsel Robert Mueller is trying to piece together what happened inside the White House over a critical 18-day period that began when senior officials were told that National Security Adviser Michael Flynn was susceptible to blackmail by Russia, according to multiple people familiar with the matter. The questions about what happened between Jan. 26 and Flynn's firing on Feb. 13 appear to relate to possible obstruction of justice by [Donald] Trump, say two people familiar with Mueller's investigation into Russia's election meddling and potential collusion with the Trump campaign."

I'm officially announcing the title of a book I will never write: From 18 Minutes to 18 Days: A History of Presidential Corruption.

Darren Samuelsohn at Politico: As Russia Probes Progress, One Name Is Missing: Bannon's. "As special Russia counsel Robert Mueller wraps up interviews with senior current and former White House staff, one name has been conspicuously absent from public chatter surrounding the probe: Steve Bannon. ...Bannon was a key bystander when Trump decided to fire national security adviser Michael Flynn, who pleaded guilty earlier this month to lying to federal investigators about his contacts with foreign officials. He was among those Trump consulted before firing FBI Director James Comey, whose dismissal prompted Mueller's appointment — a decision Bannon subsequently described to 60 Minutes as the biggest mistake 'in modern political history.' And during the campaign, Bannon was the one who offered the introduction to data-mining firm Cambridge Analytica, whose CEO has since acknowledged trying to coordinate with WikiLeaks on the release of emails from Hillary Clinton's time as secretary of state."

Bannon hasn't faced much public scrutiny (yet), but his name isn't the only one we haven't been hearing much: We haven't been hearing the name Reince Priebus at all, either — and if there's one person who I could imagine keeping his head down because he's singing like a canary, it's that little shitweasel Priebus.

Julia Ioffe at the Atlantic: What Putin Really Wants. "Both Putin and his country are aging, declining — but the insecurities of decline present their own risks to America. The United States intelligence community is unanimous in its assessment not only that Russians interfered in the U.S. election but that, in the words of former FBI Director James Comey, 'they will be back.' It is a stunning escalation of hostilities for a troubled country whose elites still have only a tenuous grasp of American politics. And it is classically Putin, and classically Russian: using daring aggression to mask weakness, to avenge deep resentments, and, at all costs, to survive. I'd come to Russia to try to answer two key questions. The more immediate is how the Kremlin, despite its limitations, pulled off one of the greatest acts of political sabotage in modern history, turning American democracy against itself. And the more important — for Americans, anyway — is what might still be in store, and how far an emboldened Vladimir Putin is prepared to go in order to get what he wants."

* * *

[CN: Disablist language] James Vincent at the Verge: Former Facebook Exec Says Social Media Is Ripping Apart Society.
Another former Facebook executive has spoken out about the harm the social network is doing to civil society around the world. Chamath Palihapitiya, who joined Facebook in 2007 and became its vice president for user growth, said he feels "tremendous guilt" about the company he helped make. "I think we have created tools that are ripping apart the social fabric of how society works," he told an audience at Stanford Graduate School of Business, before recommending people take a "hard break" from social media.

Palihapitiya's criticisms were aimed not only at Facebook, but the wider online ecosystem. "The short-term, dopamine-driven feedback loops we've created are destroying how society works," he said, referring to online interactions driven by "hearts, likes, thumbs-up." "No civil discourse, no cooperation; misinformation, mistruth. And it's not an American problem — this is not about Russians ads. This is a global problem."

...In his talk, Palihapitiya criticized not only Facebook, but Silicon Valley's entire system of venture capital funding. He said that investors pump money into "shitty, useless, idiotic companies," rather than addressing real problems like climate change and disease. Palihapitiya currently runs his own VC firm, Social Capital, which focuses on funding companies in sectors like healthcare and education.
I mean, yes. But also: There are lots of people who use social media to engage in productive discourse while centering cooperation, information, and truth; who use social media to address "real problems" like climate change and disease. It's not the tool. It's the way people are using it. And I mean both end users as well as the corporate profiteers who use it to exploit people for wealth accumulation. Just because some people use hammers for murder doesn't mean they're not useful to carpenters.

Anyway. It continues to be fascinating to me how the engineers of this particular destruction now want to blame the tools themselves, instead of their creators and the people who currently maintain them. Ahem.

Olivia Solon at the Guardian: Net Neutrality: 'Father of Internet' Joins Tech Leaders in Condemning Repeal Plan. "More than 20 internet pioneers and leaders including the 'father of the internet', Vint Cerf; the inventor of the world wide web, Tim Berners-Lee; and the Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak have urged the FCC to cancel its vote to repeal net neutrality, describing the plan as 'based on a flawed and factually inaccurate' understanding of how the internet works. 'The FCC's rushed and technically incorrect proposed order to repeal net neutrality protections without any replacement is an imminent threat to the internet we worked so hard to create. It should be stopped,' said the technology luminaries in an open letter to lawmakers with oversight of the Federal Communications Commission on Monday."

* * *

[CN: Wildfires. Covers entire section.]

AP/Guardian: Largest California Wildfire Expected to Grow as It Enters Second Week. "As southern California entered its second week engulfed in flames, fire officials said they anticipated more growth and danger due to continued strong wind gusts, no rain, and decades-old dry vegetation. A powerful flare-up on the western edge of the largest and most destructive wildfire sent residents fleeing on Sunday, as wind-fanned flames ripped down hillsides toward coastal towns north-west of Los Angeles. New evacuations were ordered as the fire sent up an enormous plume near Montecito and Carpinteria, seaside areas in Santa Barbara County."

Scott Wilson, Amy B Wang, Mark Berman, and Eli Rosenberg at the WaPo/Mercury News: After First Wildfire Fatality Confirmed, Officials Warn of More Danger in Southern California.
On Saturday, multiple wildfires continued to rage throughout Southern California, cloaking the area in nightmarish flame and towering plumes of smoke so thick they were visible from space.

On Friday, authorities reported the first fire-related death: The Ventura Medical Examiner Office identified a body found on Wednesday as Virginia Pesola, 70, from Santa Paula, the "only confirmed fire-related death in Ventura County to date." Pesola had died from "blunt force injuries with terminal smoke inhalation and thermal injuries" in a traffic incident during "active fire evacuation," according to the county medical examiner.

As the fires spread, much of the region also faces the threat posed by the dense smoke. Public health officials warned of dangerously bad air quality and said it was particularly threatening for the elderly, children, and people with respiratory or heart conditions. Los Angeles County issued smoke advisories, urging people to remain indoors when possible, while Santa Barbara County officials said they expected to distribute 50,000 masks to area residents.

Phil Moyal, an air quality specialist in Ventura County, said the smoke was causing hazardous conditions there, especially in the Ojai Valley, which is surrounded by mountains that have been trapping the smoke.

"When we say 'off the charts,' we mean off the charts," Moyal said Friday about air-quality measurements there.
[CN: Video may autoplay at link] Jeremy B White and Mythili Sampathkumar at the Independent: Year-Round Blazes Set to Become 'the New Normal' as Governor Blames Climate Change. "California Governor Jerry Brown has told the state's residents to get used to destructive wildfires in winter, declaring them 'the new normal.' ...Mr Brown said drought and climate change mean California faces a 'new reality' where lives and property are continually threatened by fire, at a cost of billions of dollars. He said it will take 'heroic' efforts in the US and abroad to stem climate change, and urged Congress to pay more attention to dealing with natural disasters such as fires, floods, and earthquakes. While California fire season was once largely confined to the hotter months when rain is scarce, officials are coming round to the idea that climate change has birthed a year-round threat. A [severe] drought helped pile up dead trees that are now fuelling the flames."

Alene Tchekmedyian at the LA Times: This Is the Fifth Largest Wildfire in Modern California History. "Since it started Monday, the Thomas fire has scorched 230,000 acres, making it the fifth-largest wildfire in modern California history."

Hayley Jones at the Daily Beast: Southern California Wildfires Are the Worst Firefighters Have Ever Seen. "It is expected Southern California will have a lengthy 'mop-up' period once the fires are contained. Mop-up is the process that occurs once a fire is out to ensure another fire does not begin from the embers of the previous, i.e. pouring water on tree stumps that may contain embers and re-creating fire roads. Mop-up for the current fires is estimated at one to two years."

* * *

DeNeen L. Brown and Cleve R. Wootson Jr. at the Washington Post: Trump Ignores Backlash, Visits Mississippi Civil Rights Museum and Praises Civil Rights Leaders. "Amid backlash and boycotts, [Donald] Trump addressed an invitation-only gathering Saturday at the Mississippi Civil Rights Museum in Jackson — instead of attending the public opening ceremony. The change in plans came after Trump's plans to attend the opening of the museum, which honors civil rights martyrs, drew criticism from some who marched in the movement. Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.), who marched with the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. and was scheduled to deliver the keynote address at the opening, announced Thursday that he would boycott the stage at the public event if Trump were on it."

His speech was...something.


Meanwhile... [CN: Islamophobia] Auditi Guha at Rewire: Trump's Travel Ban Takes Effect as Muslim Americans Face Increased Attacks.

And meanwhile... [CN: Carcerality; torture] Alfonso Serrano at Colorlines: United Nations: Taser Use in Some U.S. Prisons May Amount to Torture.

And meanwhile... [CN: Voter suppression] Pema Levy at Mother Jones: The Republican Overseeing the Alabama Election Doesn't Think Voting Should Be Easy.

And meanwhile... [CN: Gerrymandering and voter suppression]


And so forth and so on. Fuck this entire white supremacist administration and any pretense a single member of it ever gives to caring about civil rights.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

Celebrity Chef Mario Batali "Stepping Away" Following Sexual Harassment Allegations

[Content Note: Descriptions of sexual harassment and/or assault at link.]

Mario Batali, a celebrity chef with his own food empire, who is also a television star and famously besties with Gwyneth Paltrow, is stepping away from all his various business enterprises after multiple allegations of sexual harassment.

Irene Plagianos and Kitty Greenwald at Eater report:

The chef is one of four women who allege that Batali touched them inappropriately in a pattern of behavior that appears to span at least two decades. Three of the women worked for Batali in some capacity during their careers. One former employee alleges that over the course of two years, he repeatedly grabbed her from behind and held her tightly against his body. Another former employee alleges that he groped her and that, in a separate incident, he compelled her to straddle him; another alleges that he grabbed her breasts at a party, though she no longer worked for him at the time. The woman whose allegations are described above has never worked for Batali, though she works in the restaurant industry.

Batali was reprimanded for inappropriate behavior in the workplace as recently as two months ago. According to a spokesperson for Batali & Bastianich Hospitality Group — the restaurant-management services company that provides support to around 24 restaurants owned by, among others, Batali and Joe Bastianich — in October 2017, a B&B restaurant employee officially reported inappropriate behavior by Batali to the company. It was the first formal complaint about Batali, who was reprimanded and required to undergo training, according to the company.

In a statement to Eater, Batali said that he is stepping away from the day-to-day operations of his businesses for an unspecified period of time. ABC, where Batali has co-hosted the daytime show The Chew since 2011, has also asked the chef to step away from the show "while we review the allegations that have just recently come to our attention," a spokesperson said.

Batali did not deny all the allegations, saying that they "match up" with ways he has behaved.

"I apologize to the people I have mistreated and hurt. Although the identities of most of the individuals mentioned in these stories have not been revealed to me, much of the behavior described does, in fact, match up with ways I have acted. That behavior was wrong and there are no excuses. I take full responsibility and am deeply sorry for any pain, humiliation, or discomfort I have caused to my peers, employees, customers, friends, and family."
His apology statement (I really wonder who is getting rich writing these things) goes on to say how he knows he disappointed people and he knows he has to work to regain people's trust and he's going to "spend the next period of time trying to do that."

It all adds up to someone who wants to sound aware and contrite before he disappears for whatever length of time seems like he could have gotten his shit together, before he resumes his lucrative career that grants him abundant access to women over whom he wields power.

Batali is an owner of his restaurants. He can't just be fired. Whether the other owners force him out remains to be seen, I guess, but I suspect they are inclined to try to wait it out, just like he will.

Every day, there are more people speaking about about powerful men who have engaged in sexual harassment and assault. And every day, there are more monied interests invested in those powerful men who can't wait for the backlash to begin in earnest, and for public sympathy to return to men who are accused.

Open Wide...

Bernie Sanders, What Are You Even Doing?

[Content Note: Minimization of sexual harassment and assault.]

Once upon a time, before I was even born, Bernie Sanders wrote an essay in which he conjured a man in a couple fantasizing about abusing women while having sex with a female partner who is fantasizing about being raped; invoked a hypothetical newspaper article about a preteen girl being gang-raped; and referenced the woman having a "sex friend when [she was] 13 years old."

When I wrote about that essay, and Sanders' disappointing response to being asked about it, I noted that I was "more angry about the response than I was about the damn essay. The response tells me something about his current priorities and sensitivities, and I don't like what I'm being told one bit."

Because what we were all told, by one of Sanders' spokespeople, was that: "When Bernie got into this race, he understood that there would be efforts to distracts voters and the press from the real issues confronting the nation today."

And, as I said then, in May 2015, a month before Donald Trump even announced his candidacy, "male politicians seeking higher office who have loathsome ideas about women, gender roles, and sexual violence is one of 'the real issues confronting the nation today.'"

One might imagine that, with everything that has happened in the interim — including, of course, the election of a confessed serial sex abuser to the United States presidency — Sanders had reconsidered the wisdom of being dismissive of concerns about sexual violence.

One would, unfortunately, be mistaken.

On Meet the Press this weekend, where Sanders was a guest, host Chuck Todd played Sanders a clip of Republican Newt Gingrich (who led impeachment proceedings against President Bill Clinton over his affair with Monica Lewinsky while he was himself having an extramarital affair) saying that a "lynch mob" had ousted Al Franken, who was denied due process.

Todd asked Sanders if Franken shouldn't have been allowed to go before the Senate Ethics Committee, and mendaciously compared Franken to Senator Bob Menendez, who was recently tried on corruption charges, to suggest — wrongly — that Franken had been denied similar due process.

The exchange then continued:

SANDERS: I think in terms of Al Franken, what you have — and Al Franken is a friend of mine and, I think, has been a very good senator for Minnesota — but what you have is a situation where Senator Franken acknowledged wrongdoing, on several occasions inappropriate behavior, and he felt that the appropriate thing to do was to offer his resignation. I think what the absurdity is—

TODD: He didn't think — I'll be honest with you, senator — he didn't sound like somebody who thought it was appropriate. He sounded like somebody who was being forced to resign. He wasn't being forced?

SANDERS: Well, I don't know that you know what was in Al Franken's mind. But the point is, the point is, that we have the absurdity now of a president of the United States who basically says on a tape that everybody in this country has seen his pride, in a sense, in assaulting women. And he has not apologized for that and he has not offered his resignation. So I think that's the absurdity.

But I think in terms of what Gingrich was saying, there needs to be a due process. There needs to be a differentiation between somebody who pats somebody on the backside and somebody who commits terrible acts against women. And furthermore, what we need in this country and this whole debate, discussion is bringing this up, we need a cultural revolution.

Because it's not just famous people who are harassing women. There are people all over this country: Women who are working in restaurants who are being harassed every single day. We need to change the culture of how we treat women on the job.
Emphasis mine. Obviously, there is a lot there, but I want to focus on the highlighted portion.

First, I will stress again that Franken was not denied "due process" for a couple of reasons, most importantly because, in cases of older and/or non-criminal allegations, the investigation looks exactly like what news organizations reporting the allegations against Franken did: Talk to the complainant(s); interview friends and associates for contemporaneous personal reports; review social media.

To suggest there was no investigation of Franken ignores what investigations of incidents like these actually look like. It is to further ignore the journalistic rigor accompanying these reports in order to suggest reporters were merely stenographers publishing accusations they didn't even attempt to vet. That is simply not the case.

Secondly, everything about abuse ranking is gross, but the thing I hate most about Sanders' "pat on the backside vs. terrible act against women" comment is how casually it completely erases the ubiquity of sexual assault and thus the ubiquity of sexual trauma.

Someone who actually understands — and cares — how widespread sexual harassment and assault are should understand that there are countless survivors whose lived experiences already include a history of sexual abuse when they are harassed and/or assaulted (again).

An unwanted and unexpected "pat on the backside" can send someone with PTSD reeling. It can set them back years in the recovery process, where every step forward is hard fucking won.

This irresponsible and cruel narrative about how some sexual assault is so minor that it virtually shouldn't matter imagines that each act of sexual assault exists in a vacuum.

Not only does that suggest there is only one correct way to respond to unwanted touching, but it suggests that every person who is touched without their consent has exactly the same history, and exactly the same emotional resources, and exactly the same support network, and exactly the same relationship to the person touching them, and exactly the same potential recourse, and parity in all the other things that affect one's emotional response to sex abuse.

It suggests that survivors should "get over it," and that all of us can.

That is not the case.

And eliding all of those crucial differences is precisely why people who say things like Sanders said here describe sexual abuse by the act itself. A "pat on the backside" doesn't sound so bad to lots of people, in a contextless void.

But if you describe a scenario in which a boss who has been a trusted mentor pats his underling on the backside without consent or warning, just as she's about to give an important presentation, which triggers trauma from the childhood sex abuse she survived, and now she's frozen in her workplace, trying not to cry and fighting urges of self-harm and wondering if that was a one-off or if her boss is going to try something more on the client trip they're scheduled to take next week and trying to figure out how the fuck she is going to get through this presentation which could make or break the next step in her career...

Well, maybe that pat on the backside starts to look a lot more like a terrible act against a woman.

That's not some unlikely hypothetical I've conjured to shame Bernie Sanders. It is an extremely common scenario that is a part of many people's — especially women's — lived experiences.

Sure, unwanted touching isn't rape. That doesn't mean it shouldn't be taken extremely seriously.

And this endemic narrative that it somehow demeans "real" sexual abuse to treat unwanted touching seriously is garbage. To the absolute contrary, centering that unwanted touching can be a profound and serious trigger to survivors of other sexual abuse is an important acknowledgment of how horrendously common sexual violence is.

And how many of us are navigating our way through life as survivors of it.

Open Wide...

Explosion at the Port Authority in NYC

[Content Note: Terrorism.]


At the moment, these are basically all the details that are available. And it's not even clear that those details are correct. The New York Times is reporting, for instance, that two people are in custody and: "A senior emergency official said that one person, the assailant, was seriously injured by the explosion. The police said that no other injuries had been reported and advised people to avoid the area."

Most reports say one person in custody, and most reports say that only the assailant was injured. But all reports are still preliminary.

For those who aren't familiar with New York City and/or this area of Manhattan, the explosion took place near 42nd Street and 8th Avenue, which is where two subway stations, Times Square and Port Authority, are connected by a tunnel. It's a major transportation hub, especially for commuters during rush hour.

That more people weren't physically hurt is amazing and a huge relief. I have profound sympathy for the people who still have to commute through this space every day, for whom that now might be deeply upsetting for some time or for a long while.

As always, let's keep this thread image-free as we share information and updates. Thanks.

UPDATE: Mark Berman, Lindsey Bever, Amy B Wang, and Devlin Barrett at the Washington Post report:
The man suspected of setting off the explosion Monday morning in Midtown Manhattan was identified by authorities as 27-year-old Akayed Ullah, described as an immigrant from Bangladesh. The blast, which occurred in the area of the Port Authority Bus Terminal, at 42nd Street and 8th Avenue, resulted in serious injuries to the suspect and minor injuries to at least three others, authorities said during a morning news conference.

Ullah sustained burns and lacerations to his hands and abdomen, authorities said. Police said he was taken to Bellevue Hospital for treatment and then taken into custody.

Police said that three other people also suffered minor injuries caused by being in close proximity to the explosion, including ringing in the ears and headaches, and took themselves to a nearby hospital.

...While there were no immediate claims of responsibility for the explosion, a pro-Islamic State media group suggested it was carried out in response to [Donald] Trump's recent statement recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.

...On MSNBC, former New York Police Department Commissioner Bill Bratton said the suspect "was supposedly setting the device off in the name of ISIS," according to preliminary information from his police sources. ISIS is another name for the Islamic State, an extremist group that has urged its followers to wage attacks around the world.

"So, definitely a terrorist attack. Definitely intended," Bratton told the news network. "As to whether the device malfunctioned or didn't function correctly, that will have to be determined."

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of a purple sofa

Hosted by a purple sofa. Have a seat and chat.

Open Wide...

The Virtual Pub Is Open

image of a pub Photoshopped to be named 'The Beloved Community Pub'
[Explanations: lol your fat. pathetic anger bread. hey your gay.]

Belly up to the bar,
and be in this space together.

(And don't forget to tip your bartender!)

Open Wide...

The Friday Blogaround

This blogaround brought to you by whiskers.

Recommended Reading:

Melissa Minton: Nike Headquarters to Name Biggest Building on Campus After Serena Williams

Sameer Rao: Producers Guild of America Honors Ava DuVernay with 2018 Visionary Award

Monica Roberts: Lupe Valdez Is Running for Texas Governor!

Hari Ziyad: [Content Note: Misogynoir; rape culture] Tarana Burke Was Omitted from the Time Magazine Cover, So Let's Celebrate the Shit Out of Her Today!

Jessica Ensley: [CN: Anti-choicery] Abortion Opponents Claim "Censorship" — and That's Bunk

stavvers: [CN: Domestic violence] JK Rowling Is Complicit in Domestic Abuse

Vivian Kane: [CN: Domestic violence] Amber Heard Addresses J.K. Rowling's Defense of Johnny Depp's Fantastic Beasts Casting

T.C. Sottek: Ron Swanson Tells Ajit Pai He Has No Honor for Killing Net Neutrality

Samer Kalaf: [CN: Objectification; rape culture] Barstool Sports Editor-in-Chief Calls 16-Year-Old Cheerleader Hot, Sarcastically Apologizes, Deletes Everything

Leave your links and recommendations in comments. Self-promotion welcome and encouraged!

Open Wide...

What I'm Listening To



Aimee Mann: "Goose Snow Cone"

On composing this track, Aimee Mann shared on Facebook:
I wrote "Goose Snow Cone" when I was on tour in Ireland, on a cold and snowy day. I was feeling very homesick when I saw a picture on Instagram of a cat I know named Goose.

Her fluffy white face was looking up at the camera in a very plaintive way, like a little snowball, and I started singing a little song about her that turned into a song about loneliness. I intended to change the lyrics but could never find a phrase to replace the one I started with.

When it came time to make a video, I knew the original Goose had to be in it. Her owners are my friends Rob and Puloma who coincidentally produce and direct videos. One of my cats had recently gone through a long illness and I was thinking about that when I came up with the idea for the video, and I knew Puloma had to star in it, as she has a very lovely and expressive face. The vet in the video is my actual vet and he's a great guy. It was not easy wrangling Goose but the magic of editing makes it all work!
I loved this song when I first heard it, but the fact that Goose looks a lot like my Olivia, who's had to spend a lot of time at the vet lately, and will again tomorrow, makes it particularly special to me, so it's been in the rotation a lot lately.

Also: Aimee Mann's voice! Omggggg forever.

Open Wide...

For the Lonely

[Content Note: Isolation.]

One of the terribly common consequences of both Donald Trump's divisive presidency and the nonpartisan rape apologia which has accompanied the exposure of powerful men as sexual abusers is the fissures in relationships, which can leave us feeling very alone as the result of a profound betrayal of trust, or quite literally alone as the result of an irreparable break.

Because I know a lot of people are struggling with loneliness at the moment, for the above reasons and/or different reasons altogether, I have updated this piece which originally ran in the summer of 2015, for anyone who may need it now.

* * *

There have been a lot of stories about loneliness in the news lately. Stories about people who live in big communities, but can't find meaningful friendships. Stories about people who feel alone at work. Stories about how social media can create feelings of isolation, as much as it can create community. Stories about how loneliness can have physical effects on the people who suffer from it.

Loneliness is different from being lonesome. Plenty of people are lonesome, but not lonely. Plenty of people who are lonely aren't lonesome; they may be surrounded by people, but nonetheless feel isolated, longing for meaningful connections that elude them.

I'm a lonesome person. I like lots of time to myself, and I have even more time to myself than would be my preference, by virtue of this job. Many days, Iain is the only other person to whom I speak, face-to-face.

But my days are filled with interactions with terrific people. The contributors and moderators, who give me life every day. Distant friends, who offer laughter and support. Local friends, with whom I meet for movies and trivia nights. We often have visitors, who seek a getaway filled with friendship and furry snuggles.

And no one can feel truly lonely when they've got a bestie like Deeky W. Gashlycrumb, who is never more than a text away — and often in the guest room. (When I'm not in his.)

So I'm not lonely, most of the time, despite being lonesome.

But sometimes I get lonely, in a way I didn't when I worked in an office and thus had lots more face-to-face interactions with other people every day. Even though many of those interactions were undesirable ones, heh.

Loneliness hurts, for me, in a way that it hard to describe. It reverberates intensely, and it puts me completely out of balance — and out of sorts.

I feel deeply for people who are lonely in a sustained way, and don't want to be.

There is community in this space, like many spaces, but it isn't always easy to get what you need to alleviate loneliness, even in a non-virtual room filled with people. Because sometimes it isn't company we need; it's to be seen. To matter.

I don't know what it would look like to subtly create the space to be "seen" within this one. So here is a not-subtle thread, for anyone who needs to ask for something that can be provided here to ask for it. Maybe you just want to say hi, and see some likes on your comment. (I promise you will get at least one!) Maybe you want to ask that people see you, and get replies that you are seen. Maybe you just want to express that you're lonely, and have a safe space to talk about it with other people who feel the same, in the hope of feeling a little less alone.

And maybe you can't bring yourself to comment, but I hope just having the option lets you know that you are not alone and that you matter to me.

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Sophie the Torbie Cat sitting on the living room floor, looking up at me
Titchy wee Sophs!

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 323

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Here are some things in the news today:

Earlier today by me: Trump Campaign Was Offered Wikileaks Docs and Today in Republican Men Being Gross AF.

Rosalind S. Helderman, Anton Troianovski, and Tom Hamburger at the Washington Post: Russian Social Media Executive Sought to Help Trump Campaign in 2016, Emails Show.
An executive at a leading Russian social media company made several overtures to Donald Trump's presidential campaign in 2016 — including days before the November election — urging the candidate to create a page on the website to appeal to Russian Americans and Russians.

The executive at Vkontakte, or VK, Russia's equivalent to Facebook, emailed Donald Trump Jr. and social media director Dan Scavino in January and again in November of last year, offering to help promote Trump's campaign to its nearly 100 million users, according to people familiar with the messages.

"It will be the top news in Russia," Konstantin Sidorkov, who serves as VK's director of partnership marketing, wrote on Nov. 5, 2016.

While Scavino expressed interest in learning more at one point, it is unclear whether the campaign pursued the idea. An attorney for Trump Jr. said his client forwarded a pitch about the concept to Scavino early in the year and could not recall any further discussion about it.

Scavino, now the White House social media director, did not respond to requests for comment. A White House spokeswoman declined to comment.
Just to be clear, this is an entirely different story from this morning's story about emails reaching out to the Trump campaign to invite collusion. If the Trump campaign was as innocent as it would have us believe, why weren't they wondering why the fuck so many Russians were reaching out to them with ideas to rig the election, and why didn't they report any of it to U.S. authorities? That's rhetorical, of course. They were and are not innocent. That's why they have never behaved and continue not to behave like people who are.

Esme Cribb at TPM: Goldstone Followed Up on Trump Tower Meet with Trump Aide, His Client. "Rob Goldstone, the British music publicist who set up a meeting in June 2016 between Donald Trump Jr. and a Kremlin-linked lawyer, sent emails later in the summer to another Russian who attended the meeting, and one of [Donald] Trump's aides, CNN reported on Thursday. CNN reported, citing multiple unnamed sources, that Goldstone emailed Dan Scavino, who was director of social media for Trump's campaign and now fills the same position in the White House. According to the report, Goldstone also emailed Emin Agalarov, a Russian pop star and his client, and Irakly 'Ike' Kaveladze, who was accused of having a pivotal role in a large-scale alleged scheme to funnel hundreds of millions of dollars in Russian money through U.S. banks in the 1990s. Kaveladze attended the meeting in Trump Tower between Trump Jr. and the Russian lawyer, Natalia Veselnitskaya."

In one of the emails, Goldstone urged Scavino "to have Trump create a page on VK, a Russian-based social media website, and told him that 'Don and Paul' supported the idea, referring to Trump Jr. and Paul Manafort, then Trump's campaign chair."

So, Sidorkov sends an email offering to set up the page, and then Goldstone sends a separate email urging them to set up the page, noting that Don Jr. and Manafort are into it.

Welp.

[CN: Video may autoplay at link] Rhonda Schwartz and Matthew Mosk at ABC News: George Papadopoulos' Fiancee: He's a Patriot, Not a Trump Campaign Coffee Boy. "Mangiante said she decided to speak publicly to counter claims from [Donald] Trump and his aides that Papadopoulos was, as Trump tweeted, a 'young, low level volunteer.' Or in the words of campaign adviser Michael Caputo, a 'coffee boy.' Mangiante said he was far from a bit player in the historic Republican campaign. ...Mangiante said Papadopoulos 'set up meetings with leaders all over the world' for senior campaign officials. He was 'constantly in touch with high-level officials in the campaign,' she added. That included direct communication with now-former senior Trump advisers Steve Bannon and Michael Flynn, Mangiante said, adding that she had seen correspondence supporting the assertion."

Pew Research Center: Stark Partisan Divisions over Russia Probe, Including Its Importance to the Nation. "A majority of Americans say they think senior members of Donald Trump's administration definitely or probably had improper contacts with Russia during last year's presidential campaign. ...Republicans and Democrats are deeply divided in views of possible wrongdoing by senior administration officials, as well as in confidence in Mueller to conduct a fair investigation. In addition, while just 19% of Republicans view the Russia probe as 'very important' to the nation, more than three times as many Democrats (71%) say the same."

Where have all the Real AmericansTM of the Republican Party gone...?

* * *

Bella DePaulo at the Washington Post: I Study Liars; I've Never Seen One Like Trump. "I spent the first two decades of my career as a social scientist studying liars and their lies. I thought I had developed a sense of what to expect from them. Then along came [Donald] Trump. His lies are both more frequent and more malicious than ordinary people's. ...Starting in early October, The Post's tracking showed that Trump told a remarkable nine lies a day, outpacing even the biggest liars in our research. But the flood of deceit isn't the most surprising finding about Trump. ...The most stunning way Trump's lies differed from our participants', though, was in their cruelty. An astonishing 50 percent of Trump's lies were hurtful or disparaging. ...By telling so many lies, and so many that are mean-spirited, Trump is violating some of the most fundamental norms of human social interaction and human decency."

Mark Hand at ThinkProgress: Ryan Zinke Orders Helicopter to Get Him to Horseback Ride with Mike Pence on Time. Ben Lefebvre, an energy reporter for Politico, reported "that Zinke spent more than $14,000 on government helicopters this past summer 'to take himself and staff to and from official events near Washington, D.C.' Based on documents released to Politico in response to a Freedom of Information Act request, Zinke ordered a U.S. Park Police helicopter to take him and his chief of staff to an emergency management exercise in Shepherdstown, West Virginia, on June 21. Zinke also ordered a Park Police helicopter to fly him and another Interior official to and from Yorktown, Virginia, on July 7 in order to be back in Washington in time for a late-afternoon horseback ride with Vice President Mike Pence."

Aram Roston at BuzzFeed: Private War: Erik Prince Has His Eye on Afghanistan's Rare Metals. "Controversial private security tycoon Erik Prince has famously pitched an audacious plan to the Trump administration: Hire him to privatize the war in Afghanistan using squads of 'security contractors.' Now, for the first time, Buzzfeed News is publishing that pitch, a presentation that lays out how Prince wanted to take over the war from the US military — and how he envisioned mining some of the most war-torn provinces in Afghanistan to help fund security operations and obtain strategic mineral resources for the US." What a disgusting person he is.

Speaking of gross people... [CN: Sexual assault] Stephanie Convery at the Guardian: Bryan Singer Denies Sexually Assaulting 17-Year-Old Boy at Yacht Party in 2003. "Director Bryan Singer has denied sexual assault allegations after being sued for allegedly sexually assaulting a 17-year-old boy. The news comes just days after he was fired from his role as director of the Queen biopic, Bohemian Rhapsody. Cesar Sanchez-Guzman alleged in court filings obtained by Deadline that he was sexually assaulted by the director of X-Men and Superman Returns on a yacht in 2003. Singer has denied the allegations, according to reports." Of course he has. He has denied all of the very many allegations against him in which all of the accusers tell very similar stories about how he assaulted them.

[CN: Class warfare; appropriation] Andy Towle: Trump Supporter Peter Thiel Is Funding a Members-Only LGBTQ Social Club in SF Called 'Yass'. "A venture capital firm co-founded by Peter Thiel, the gay conservative who donated $1.25 million to Trump, is the sole backer of Yass, a new members-only LGBTQ 'co-working space and social club.' Yass is set to open in San Francisco's Mission District in the spring. But it already has expansion plans, given a poll on its homepage asking if visitors want a 'Yass' in their city. ...Critics of the project cite dues which they feel will keep lower-income queers out, the need of existing organizations for financial support, the appropriation of the term 'Yass' from drag ball culture, and of course, Thiel." This fucking guy.

[CN: Police misconduct; sexual assault; bigotry; abuse] Maya Lau, Ben Poston, and Corina Knoll at the LA Times: Inside a Secret 2014 List of Hundreds of L.A. Deputies with Histories of Misconduct. "Ovalle kept his job, but his name was placed on a secret Sheriff's Department list that now includes about 300 deputies with histories of dishonesty and similar misconduct, a Los Angeles Times investigation has found. The list is so tightly controlled that it can be seen by only a handful of high-ranking sheriff's officials. Not even prosecutors can access it. Amid growing public scrutiny over police misconduct, Sheriff Jim McDonnell wants to give the names on the list to prosecutors, who are required by law to tell criminal defendants about evidence that would damage the credibility of an officer called as a witness. But McDonnell's efforts have ignited a fierce legal battle with the union that represents rank-and-file deputies. The dispute, which the California Supreme Court is expected to decide next year, is playing out in a state with some of the nation's strictest secrecy laws on police misconduct."

* * *

[CN: Environmental racism; class warfare] Jay Hancock, Rachel Bluth, and Daniel Trielli at the Washington Post: Hospitals Find Asthma Hot Spots More Profitable to Neglect Than Fix.
Summerville and her family live in the worst asthma hot spot in Baltimore: Zip code 21223, where decrepit houses, rodents, and bugs trigger the disease and where few community doctors work to prevent asthma emergencies.

Residents of this area visit hospitals for asthma flare-ups at more than four times the rate of people from the city's wealthier neighborhoods, according to data analyzed by Kaiser Health News and the University of Maryland's Capital News Service.

...The supreme irony of the localized epidemic is that Keyonta's neighborhood in southwest Baltimore is in the shadow of prestigious medical centers — Johns Hopkins, whose researchers are international experts on asthma prevention, and the University of Maryland Medical Center (UMMC).

Both receive massive tax breaks in return for providing "community benefit," a poorly defined federal requirement that they serve their neighborhoods. Under Maryland's ambitious effort to control medical costs, both are supposed to try to improve residents' health outside the hospital and prevent admissions.

But like hospitals across the country, the institutions have done little to address the root causes of asthma. The perverse incentives of the health-care payment system have long made it far more lucrative to treat severe, dangerous asthma attacks than to prevent them.
Another supercool feature of our for-profit healthcare system: Make more money letting children struggle to breathe. Seethe.

[CN: Misogynoir; maternal death] Nina Martin and Renee Montagna at STAT: Nothing Protects Black Women from Dying in Pregnancy and Childbirth. "The researcher working to eradicate disparities in health access and outcomes had become a symbol of one of the most troublesome health disparities facing black women in the U.S. today, disproportionately high rates of maternal mortality. The main federal agency seeking to understand why so many American women — especially black women — die and nearly die from complications of pregnancy and childbirth had lost one of its own. Even Shalon's many advantages — her B.A. in sociology, her two master's degrees and dual-subject Ph.D., her gold-plated insurance, and rock-solid support system — had not been enough to ensure her survival. If a village this powerful hadn't been able to protect her, was any black woman safe?"

[CN: War on agency] Betsy Woodruff at the Daily Beast: Justice Department Moves to Investigate Planned Parenthood's Fetal Tissue Practices. "The head of Justice's office of legislative affairs has sent a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee asking for documents from its investigation of Planned Parenthood's fetal tissue practices. The Daily Beast reviewed the letter, which says the requested documents are 'for investigative use.'" Oh for fuck's sake.

[CN: Misogyny] Mona Chalabi at the Guardian: Read This Before You Have a Baby (Especially If You're a Woman). "It seems so obvious: having kids affects men and women differently. Sure, emotionally and financially but most clearly in the simple way mothers and fathers spend their time. And when you actually look at how 10,900 Americans carve up 24 hours, the conclusion is pretty stark: If you're a woman who enjoys paid work or relaxing activities, having kids will cramp your style."


[CN: White supremacy; homophobia] Jessica Mason Pieklo at Rewire: Cakes for the Klan? Conservatives Craft a Trojan Horse in Supreme Court's LGBTQ Discrimination Case. "Then came U.S. Solicitor General Noel Francisco to the podium to argue on behalf of the Trump administration's support of Phillips. Francisco is no stranger to the culture wars or to [the conservative litigation advocacy organization Alliance Defending Freedom]. Francisco has been affiliated with the legal advocacy organization, a fact he failed to disclose and a fact ADF was desperately trying to scrub prior to arguments, lest there be an appearance of bias from the federal government. There was no appearance of bias during Francisco's case. The bias was front and center to the administration's arguments. Francisco insisted that under the Colorado law, a Black baker would be forced to create a cake for the Ku Klux Klan. This is a point the conservative justices jumped on, despite knowing that the KKK is not a protected class and therefore not subject to the same anti-discrimination protection as a same-sex couple."

[CN: Nativism] Alfonso Serrano at Colorlines: Will Congress Shut Down the Government for the Dreamers? "House Republicans are expected to introduce a short-term spending bill today (December 7) that would keep the federal government running until December 22, but top Democrats say they won't vote for the year-end funding bill unless it contains provisions that protect young immigrants, called Dreamers, from the threat of deportation. ...House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) are expected to meet [Donald] Trump at the White House today, where they will attempt to resolve major differences, including immigration, before reaching a deal on the funding bill. Trump has not budged from his demand for border wall funding and a hard-line immigration stance."

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

Important End-of-Year Fundraiser

image of a white piggy bank wearing black glasses, into which three pennies are falling, accompanied by text reading: 'Shakesville End-of-Year Fundraiser | Your donations are necessary to support Shakesville's daily content & vibrant community in an ad-free space.'

This is a critical fundraiser to keep Shakesville going.

As I have been once before, I want to be very blunt with y'all: To keep doing this job, and to keep Shakesville a safe ad-free space, I need to be making enough through donations to support myself, independently. Although Iain and I combine resources, like many couples, I don't want to find myself in a place where I couldn't support myself on my own if I needed and/or wanted to. And donations have dipped below that level.

I don't mean for that to sound like an ultimatum: I'm just trying to be as straightforward as possible. It takes an enormous amount of time, more than a full-time job, to manage the community, write and edit content, moderate comments alongside the other mods, and engage with readers via email and social media. I can't do this and hold down another job. I tried it, most of last year, and it nearly ended me.

So this gig has to pay me a livable wage for my time, and enough to pay contributors for their work, or I need to find another way to make a living.

And just to be abundantly clear: I'm not looking to get rich off this work. I simply want to make enough money that I am able to support myself modestly, in exchange for my full-time labor.

So, if you value the content and/or community in this space, please consider setting up a subscription or making a single end-of-year contribution.

Please click the button below to make a one-time donation:



Or use the below dropdown menu to choose set up a recurring monthly donation:

Subscription Options




I cannot afford to do this full-time for free, but, even if I could, fundraising is also one of the most feminist acts I do here. I ask to be paid for my work because progressive feminist advocacy has value; because women's work has value.

So! If you value my work here and/or on Twitter, please remember that Shakesville is run exclusively on donations. I would certainly be grateful for your support, if you are able to chip in.

Thank you to each of you who donates or has donated, whether monthly or as a one-off. I am deeply appreciative. This community couldn't exist without that support, truly. Thank you.

My thanks as well to everyone who contributes to the space in other ways, whether as a contributor, a moderator, a guest writer, a transcriber, and/or as someone who takes the time to send me a note of support and encouragement, some cool art, or anything else you think might give me a smile or fill my lungs with air. (You're usually right!) This community couldn't exist without you, either.

Finally and essentially: Please note that I don't want anyone to feel obliged to contribute financially, especially if money is tight. There is a big enough readership that no one needs to donate if it would be a hardship, and no one should ever feel bad about that.

I mean that. We're all in this thing together.

One of the things I hate most about fundraising is knowing that it might make some people feel bad, if they want to donate but aren't able. I would never presume to tell you how to feel, but please know that I don't want you to feel bad.

What I want is for you to know that, some days, your kind words are the only thing that keeps me going. I need money to survive. It is your encouragement that keeps me doing this work. You support me in many ways, and I am immensely thankful for them all. ♥

Open Wide...

Today in Republican Men Being Gross AF

[Content Note: Misogyny; white supremacy; sexual harassment.]

#1: Rep. Trent Franks.

Trent Franks, an extremely conservative Congressman from Arizona, will resign after reports that he made two former female staffers "feel uncomfortable" by asking them if they would be surrogates for his child.

Whut.

To be honest, I'm not even sure from reports if it was a serious request, and he was literally treating his female staffers like potential incubators (an entirely expected disposition toward women from an anti-choice legislator), or if it was a Top Ten revolting attempt at soliciting sex.

Either way: Gross AF.

#2: Erik Prince.

Founder of Blackwater mercenary outfit and brother of Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, Erik Prince is a real piece of shit in at least a dozen different ways. Even by the impossibly low standards he's already set, this is really something:


[If you can't view the screen cap embedded in the tweet, it is an excerpt from Prince's book, in which he details how difficult his life was when his wife got cancer. Caring for their four children was "exhausting," and he never got laid. So he "found comfort in the arms of a woman named Joanna Houck, who had worked as our nanny in Michigan. In mid-2002, when we all moved back to Virginia, she was hired to perform administrative functions at our Moyock facilities. She became pregnant before Joan died."]

There is literally not a single person affiliated with the Trump administration even distantly who is not a vile gremlin. Gross AF.

#3: Rep. Blake Farenthold.

Blake Farenthold, a conservative Congressman from Texas, was recently reported to have used taxpayer funds to settle a sexual harassment claim brought Lauren Greene, his former communications director, after she alleged gender discrimination, sexual harassment, and creating a hostile work environment.

Now, the House Ethics Committee has launched an investigation "over allegations that he sexually harassed a former aide and then retaliated against her when she complained about it. ...The ethics panel had reached out to interview Greene more than a year ago. But Greene, who has tried to move on with her life since leaving Farenthold's office, declined to participate, hoping to put the matter behind her. However, after Greene spoke with POLITICO and CNN this week about being blackballed following her allegations, the Ethics Committee reached out again."

It wasn't just that Farenthold harassed her and then paid for her silence; it's that he then apparently tried to ruin her career.

This fucking guy. Gross AF.

#4: Roy Moore.

Alabama Senate candidate Roy Moore is a truly detestable specimen. He is a serial sexual abuser, a misogynist, a homophobe, a Christian supremacist, and, of course, a white supremacist.
At Moore's Florence rally, the former judge outlined all the wrongs he sees in Washington and "spiritual wickedness in high places." He warned of "the awful calamity of abortion and sodomy and perverse behavior and murders and shootings and road rage" as "a punishment inflicted upon us for our presumptuous sins."

In response to a question from one of the only African Americans in the audience — who asked when Moore thought America was last "great" — Moore acknowledged the nation's history of racial divisions, but said: "I think it was great at the time when families were united — even though we had slavery — they cared for one another… Our families were strong, our country had a direction."

At the same event, Moore referred to Native Americans and Asian Americans as "reds and yellows," and earlier this year he suggested the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks were divine punishment.
"Even though we had slavery." This guy is a catastrophic wreck of humanity with rancid shit where his decency should be.

The audience member who asked that very clever question is incredibly brave.

And you know what Moore is: Gross AF.

#5: Donald Trump and Mike Pence.

Donald Trump and Mike Pence are still the sitting president and vice-president of this nation. The former is a confessed serial sex abuser and unapologetic rape apologist who publicly accuses women who report being victimized of lying. The latter is a patriarchal nightmare creep who brags about never being alone with any women beside his wife, thus reinforcing narratives about men being unable to control their sexual urges and women being obliged to tame them.

They are both gross AF.

Open Wide...

Trump Campaign Was Offered Wikileaks Docs

[Content Note: Video may autoplay at link.]

Manu Raju and Jeremy Herb at CNN: Email Shows Effort to Give Trump Campaign WikiLeaks Documents.

Candidate Donald Trump, his son Donald Trump Jr. and others in the Trump Organization received an email in September 2016 offering a decryption key and website address for hacked WikiLeaks documents, according to an email provided to congressional investigators.

The September 4 email was sent during the final stretch of the 2016 presidential race — two months after the hacked emails of the Democratic National Committee were made public and one month before WikiLeaks began leaking the contents of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta's hacked emails.

The email came less than three weeks before WikiLeaks itself messaged Trump Jr. and began an exchange of direct messages on Twitter. Trump Jr. told investigators he had no recollection of the September email.

Congressional investigators are trying to ascertain whether the individual who sent the September email is legitimate and whether it shows additional efforts by WikiLeaks to connect with Trump's son and others on the Trump campaign. The email also indicated that the Trump campaign could access records from former Secretary of State Colin Powell, whose hacked emails were made public by a Russian front group 10 days later.

The email, which was described to CNN by multiple sources and verified by Trump Jr.'s attorney, came from someone who listed his name as "Mike Erickson." It was addressed to Trump, Trump Jr., Trump Jr.'s personal assistant and others, and turned over to Congress as part of the documents provided by the Trump Organization.

Congressional investigators are uncertain who the sender is, and CNN was unable to make contact with the individual. It's not clear whether the email was a legitimate effort to provide the hacked documents to the Trump campaign.
So, just to be abundantly clear: Investigators aren't certain whether the email, from someone calling himself Mike Erickson, was a legitimate outreach from Wikileaks, or someone just purporting to be from Wikileaks.

But the email was sent only three weeks before Don Jr. began his 10-month correspondence with Wikileaks.

And this is a key detail: "Trump Jr.'s attorney, Alan Futerfas, told CNN that his client said he had no recollection of the email and took no action on it."

In other words, they did not report it to authorities. Which is a big problem, even if they didn't act on it.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of a pink couch

Hosted by a pink sofa. Have a seat and chat.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Suggested by Shaker Nitro_Mom: "What's your favorite or most-used inexpensive tool, gadget, or other small product? Thinking of kitchen gadgets, grooming tools, cleaning aids, small assistive devices, but could be anything."

I've already mentioned this item twice, lol, but I have to say my Oxo Soap Dispensing Dish Brush. I love this thing! ("Clearly."—You.) I use it multiple times every day, and it's just a perfect tool for what I need.

Open Wide...