Happy National Coming Out Day!

image

Today is the 30th (!) annual National Coming Out Day! Thirty years ago today, half a million people marched on Washington for LGBTQ equality and Coming Out Day was born.

A lot has changed since then. And a lot hasn't. But what has changed, and what will change, is due to the brave women, men, and genderqueer folks who come out because they expect more than a closet.

As long as we live in a deeply hetero- and ciscentrist culture that privileges straightness and cisgenderedness, coming out will remain a radical act — and anyone who comes out is an activist and an advocate, sheerly by virtue of their public existence, because straight/cis people who know out members of the queer community are exponentially more likely to be political allies.

The privileging of straightness also means that coming out is not a fixed event on a single day in a life, but a never-ending process of assessing one's safety and balancing it against the need for disclosure. Coming out to family, coming out to old friends, coming out to new friends, coming out at school, coming out at every new job... A series of comings out necessitated by a culture that reflexively assigns straightness until an individual demands to be recognized otherwise, a culture that arbitrarily and unnecessarily attaches meaning, and difference, to sexual orientation.

There yet remain many places in the world, including lots of parts of the US, in which queer people do not feel safe coming out. As we mark Coming Out Day in this space, let us remember those people who have not come out for reasons of personal safety, or religious oppression, or out of a profound fear of familial or community rejection.

And let us celebrate coming out, and the people who build spaces where coming out and being out is safe.

I invite you to share your coming out stories here, as a road-map to the people who are beginning that journey, and an invitation to the party that awaits them when they arrive.

* * *

Here are some National Coming Out Day pieces I read today that you also may appreciate...

Monica Roberts: National Coming Out Day 2017

Patrick Lee: Letter to Immigrant Parents on National Coming Out Day

Gillian Telling: How Wilson Cruz's Coming Out Story Mirrored His My So-Called Life Character's — and His Advice for Gay Youth

Karen Frost: Coming Out Again and Again: Reliving the Coming Out Process Onscreen

Open Wide...

This Seems Like a Good Time to Get Rid of the Hollywood and Highland Casting Couch

[Content Note: Rape culture.]

In the wake of all the Weinstein news, reader Robin emailed me to ask if I would write about the "casting couch statue in Hollywood." Robin writes, which I am sharing with permission: "On a tour last year our guide made smirking, smarmy comments about it. Lots of people would have seen it. Famous. Part of the classic tour."

I had never heard of this monstrosity, but, as Robin notes, it is part of at least one Hollywood tour and is featured on multiple online tourist guides. I called the management of the building where it's displayed to confirm it's still there. It is.

Sitting atop the Hollywood and Highland Shopping Center, on the north-facing observation deck with a view of the Hollywood Sign, is a golden chaise, positioned beside a tiled floor mural reading: "The Road to Hollywood: How some of us got here."

[Photo via TripSavvy. Credit: Shelly Munkberg/Flickr/CC BY-NC-ND 2.0]

TripSavvy, as part of a "practical guide" for visitors to Hollywood and Highland, notes, lest there be any doubt about its context: "This over-sized piece of furniture is the most popular spot for a photograph at Hollywood and Highland. The term 'casting couch' originated with unscrupulous casting agents, whose office furniture could be used for sexual activity between them and aspiring actresses looking to get an advantage."

Actresses looking to get an advantage. Oh.

Writes Robin: "Hollywood acts shocked (!!!) by revelations while literally having a casting couch statue celebrating rape culture."

While we're immersed in news about Harvey Weinstein's sexual predation, and also having a national conversation about the value of monuments to institutional abuse, it seems like a good time to reconsider the existence of this fucking thing.

In other words: Get rid of it. Now.

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Zelda the Black and Tan Mutt lying her head next to my leg while I'm sitting at my desk
Zelda subtly seeking attention while I'm working. That face. ♥

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 265

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Here are some things in the news today:

Earlier today by me: Tillerson Isn't a Hero for Calling Trump a Disablist Slur and SO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT, REPUBLICANS.

[Content Note: Food insecurity] Richard Wolffe at the Guardian: U.S. Officials Privately Acknowledge Serious Food Shortage. "Federal officials privately admit there is a massive shortage of meals in Puerto Rico three weeks after Hurricane Maria devastated the island. Officials at the Federal Emergency Management Agency say that the government and its partners are only providing 200,000 meals a day to meet the needs of more than 2 million people. That is a daily shortfall of between 1.8m and 5.8m meals. The scale of the food crisis dwarfs the more widely publicized challenges of restoring power and communications. More than a third of Puerto Ricans are still struggling to live without drinking water." Rage. Seethe. Boil.

[CN: Descriptions of injury, death, and neglect at the link] Frances Robles at the New York Times: Puerto Rico's Health Care Is in Dire Condition, Three Weeks After Maria. "Nearly three weeks after Hurricane Maria tore through Puerto Rico, many sick people across the island remain in mortal peril. The government's announcements each morning about the recovery effort are often upbeat, but beyond them are hidden emergencies. Seriously ill dialysis patients across Puerto Rico have seen their treatment hours reduced by 25 percent because the centers still lack a steady supply of diesel to run their generators. Less than half of Puerto Rico's medical employees have reported to work in the weeks since the storm, federal health officials said. Hospitals are running low on medicine and high on patients, as they take in the infirm from medical centers where generators failed."

The death toll now stands at 43. That number is going to continue to rise without urgent interventions.

* * *

Nicole Lafond at TPM: Trump Threatens NBC's TV License After Network Publishes Unfavorable Reports. "After suggesting last week that American media outlets should be investigated by Congress, [Donald] Trump on Wednesday appeared to threaten NBC's broadcast license over the network's reporting on tensions between the President and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson. He tweeted: 'With all of the Fake News coming out of NBC and the Networks, at what point is it appropriate to challenge their License? Bad for country!' As a businessman and candidate, Trump frequently threatened to sue news organizations over unflattering coverage. But his latest threat of using the power of the federal government to go after media companies represents a dramatic escalation in his ongoing war against the press."


Michael Kranish at the Washington Post: 'He's Better Than This,' Says Thomas Barrack, Trump's Loyal Whisperer. "[Thomas J. Barrack Jr., a billionaire who is one of Donald Trump's oldest friends] said he has often thought about how he has remained a close friend for 30 years with a man whose 'reputation is selfish and egotistical. Here's what I think the answer is: I've never needed anything from him. ...I was always subservient to him.'" That doesn't sound like a friendship then. I honestly don't think Trump has any real friends. He only has people in his orbit who will say things like "he's better than this," despite all evidence to the contrary.

[CN: Islamophobia] Imani Gandy at Rewire: Civil Rights Groups Demand Transparency on Trump's Muslim Ban. "The lawsuit filed by Muslim Advocates, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, and Southern Poverty Law Center demands that the Trump administration provide information regarding a waiver process built into the Muslim ban by which foreign nationals barred from entry by Trump's executive orders may nonetheless gain entry to the United States. Trump on September 24 announced his third attempt to implement his long-promised Muslim travel ban by way of presidential proclamation. ...The proclamation includes a process that permits consular officers to grant waivers on a 'case-by-case' basis, thus allowing foreign nationals who might otherwise be barred to enter the United States. Trump administration officials have been silent about the procedures that will be implemented to evaluate waiver requests, prompting immigration rights advocates to demand transparency."

Nicole Perlroth and Scott Shane at the New York Times: How Israel Caught Russian Hackers Scouring the World for U.S. Secrets.
It was a case of spies watching spies watching spies: Israeli intelligence officers looked on in real time as Russian government hackers searched computers around the world for the code names of American intelligence programs.

What gave the Russian hacking, detected more than two years ago, such global reach was its improvised search tool — antivirus software made by a Russian company, Kaspersky Lab, that is used by 400 million people worldwide, including by officials at some two dozen American government agencies.

The Israeli officials who had hacked into Kaspersky's own network alerted the United States to the broad Russian intrusion, which has not been previously reported, leading to a decision just last month to order Kaspersky software removed from government computers.

The Russian operation, described by multiple people who have been briefed on the matter, is known to have stolen classified documents from a National Security Agency employee who had improperly stored them on his home computer, on which Kaspersky's antivirus software was installed. What additional American secrets the Russian hackers may have gleaned from multiple agencies, by turning the Kaspersky software into a sort of Google search for sensitive information, is not yet publicly known.
I don't think Trump has made one public statement about this. I'm not even sure he's been asked about it. Just a major national security issue that is less important to this president than the NFL's tax breaks.

Ali Watkins at Politico: Carter Page Says He Won't Testify Before Senate Intelligence Panel in Russia Probe. "Carter Page, a former foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign, informed the Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday that he will not be cooperating with any requests to appear before the panel for its investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election and would plead the Fifth, according to a source familiar with the matter." In case anyone had managed to forget why it is that Trump is more consumed with NFL tax breaks than Russian espionage.


Mike Allen and Jonathan Swan at Axios: Inside Bannon's Plans for a GOP Civil War. "Establishment Republicans are getting squeezed to death from within. In what should be nirvana — all-party control of Washington — they instead are jammed daily between a president who routinely ridicules them for ineptitude — and Steve Bannon, who's recruiting hardliners to extinguish their very existence." And they have no one to blame but themselves. I would delight at their destruction, if only I weren't keenly aware that whoever Bannon elevates will be even worse.

[Content Note: Mass shooting; war on agency] Katie Klabusich at Truthout: Congress Uses Las Vegas Massacre to Push Abortion Ban.
This week, the Senate takes up an unconstitutional bill recently passed 237-189 in the House that would ban all abortion after 20 weeks. The deceptively named "Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act" (H.R. 36) would "make it a crime for any person to perform or attempt to perform an abortion if the probable post-fertilization age of the fetus is 20 weeks or more."

The claim that a fetus can feel pain at 20 weeks has been thoroughly debunked.

...With just a 52-seat majority, Senate Republicans would need to gather 60 votes to prevent Democrats from filibustering. In an effort to create a sense of urgency, House Republican leaders issued a statement declaring that their inspiration to vote on H.R. 36 came from the mass shooting in Las Vegas. They wrote that after the shooting, "we are reminded just how precious life is … We spoke of the potential of life — especially lives cut short through abortion."

NARAL Nevada Las Vegas Organizing Coordinator Cyndy Hernandez responded with a statement of her own: "This horrific, politically motivated response is not what those of us here in Las Vegas need. On behalf of families across the state of every political background, NARAL Nevada calls on Rep. Amodei and Congressional Republicans to retract these offensive remarks and commit to never again using the pain and suffering of our community to justify taking away our rights."
There is no depth to Republicans' depravity. Jesus fucking Jones.

[CN: Misogynistic violence; racism] Auditi Guha at Rewire: Will Congress Do Something About Missing, Murdered Native Women? "Congressional legislation introduced last week aims to improve the federal response to the crisis of missing and murdered Native women. Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND) on October 5 introduced Savanna's Act, named in honor of 22-year-old Savanna LaFontaine-Greywind of the Spirit Lake and Turtle Mountain Chippewa Nations in North Dakota. LaFontaine-Greywind vanished in August while eight months pregnant. Her body was found eight days later in the Red River. On some reservations, Native women and girls are murdered at a rate more than ten times the national average. Eighty-four percent of Native women have experienced violence in their lifetime... Native advocates commended the new legislation introduced by Heitkamp. Savanna's Act is 'an important step towards interrupting the crisis of invisibility of murdered and missing Native women and girls in law enforcement practices,' Judith LeBlanc, director of the Native Organizers Alliance, told Rewire."

[CN: LGBTQ hatred] Andy Towle at Towleroad: Trump Administration Pulls Out of Stonewall Event, Sought Assurance That No LGBT Pride Flag Is on Federal Land. "The Trump administration got wind of what was happening on October 11 at the Stonewall National Monument, where a rainbow flag is set to be hoisted and was publicized as the first LGBTQ Pride flag flying permanently on federal land. Now the National Park Service under Secretary Ryan Zinke has pulled its representative from the event and is working to certify that 'the flagpole adjacent to Christopher Park was not technically on federal land so that no rainbow flag would be flying on US government property,' according to NYC's Gay City News."

[CN: Police brutality] Jamiles Lartey at the Guardian: U.S. Police Killings Undercounted by Half, Study Using Guardian Data Finds. "Over half of all police killings in 2015 were wrongly classified as not having been the result of interactions with officers, a new Harvard study based on Guardian data has found. The finding is just the latest to show government databases seriously undercounting the number of people killed by police. ...Researchers found the accuracy varied wildly by state, with just 17.6% misclassification in Washington, but a startling 100% in Oklahoma. '[Oklahoma] had more than 30 people were killed by police there in 2015 and none of them were counted on death certificates,' [lead researcher Justin Feldman] said."

Laura Hazard Owen at NeimanLab: The Share of Women in Newsrooms Has Increased Barely 1 Percentage Point Since 2001, ASNE Data Shows. "The share of people of color working in the 661 news organizations that took the survey was 16.55 percent in 2017, down slightly from 16.94 percent in 2016. (Things look a little better at online-only news sites: 24.3 percent of journalists working there were people of color, up from 23.3 percent last year.) ...Women made up 39.1 percent of all newsroom employees in 2017, compared to 38.7 percent in 2016. (And only up slightly from way back in 2001, when it was 37.35 percent.) Again, online-only news organizations did better than daily newspapers: 47.8 percent of online-only news site employees were women, compared to 47.6 percent in 2016, while at daily newspapers, women comprised 38.9 percent of employees, compared to 38.1 percent in 2016." BOO.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

Matt Damon Defends Himself, But.

[Content Note: Rape culture.]

Matt Damon, who was accused of being enlisted by Harvey Weinstein to kill a story on his predation in 2004, has given an interview to Deadline in which he shares his version of events:

DEADLINE: It was reported that you and Russell Crowe were conscripted by Harvey Weinstein to call Sharon Waxman in an effort to derail a New York Times piece similar to the ones we are reading now.

DAMON: My recollection was that it was about a one minute phone call. Harvey had called me and said, they're writing a story about Fabrizio, who I knew from The Talented Mr. Ripley. He has organized our premiere in Italy and so I knew him in a professional capacity and I'd had dinner at his house. Harvey said, Sharon Waxman is writing a story about Fabrizio and it's really negative. Can you just call and tell her what your experience with Fabrizio was. So I did, and that's what I said to her. It didn't even make the piece that she wrote. As I recall, her piece just said that Russell and I had called and relayed our experience with Fabrizio. That was the extent of it and so I was very surprised to see it come back. I was never conscripted to do anything. We vouch for each other, all the time, and it didn't even make her article. Whether it didn't jibe with her storyline…it was an incomplete rendering of someone that I was giving but I had perfectly professional experiences with Fabrizio and I didn't mind telling her that.

I'm sure I mentioned to her that I didn't know anything about the rest of her piece, because I didn't. And I still don't know anything about that and Fabrizio. My experience with him was all above board and that's what I told her.

DEADLINE: After The New York Times piece last week, Harvey reportedly went to Hollywood power brokers urging them to defend him in messages that would be conveyed to the board of directors deciding if he should be fired. No one did, apparently. It would be easy to misinterpret your overture in a similar way. When Harvey asked you to do that, was there any mention that Sharon Waxman was reporting a piece on the indiscretions we are reading about now?

DAMON: No, I just remember it being a negative piece, a hit job on Fabrizio, was what Harvey was saying. Basically, that he had no professional experience. Harvey said, you worked with him. Can you tell her that he was a professional and you had a good experience, and that was it. I didn't mind doing it, because that was all true.

...DEADLINE: Just to reiterate, Waxman didn't tell you the point of her story?

DAMON: She didn't. She called us to apologize about this thing coming out, and she claimed she was in her car with her kids when I talked to her. It was a 30 second conversation.

For the record, I would never, ever, ever try to kill a story like that. I just wouldn't do that. It's not something I would do, for anybody.
So, here's the thing: Sharon Waxman and Matt Damon can both be right. Indeed, I suspect that they are.

Waxman wrote: "After intense pressure from Weinstein, which included having Matt Damon and Russell Crowe call me directly to vouch for Lombardo and unknown discussions well above my head at the Times, the story was gutted."

She makes it clear, to my reading, that Damon was enlisted by Weinstein as part of his (ultimately successful) pressure campaign to have the story killed.

Indeed, after Damon's statement was published, Waxman herself tweeted her endorsement of it:


That, however, is not the end of the story — at least, it shouldn't be. Because what Damon never gets to in his statement of self-defense is that he was used by Harvey Weinstein to protect him from exposure as a serial sex abuser.

It may well be true that, as he claims, Matt Damon "would never, ever, ever try to kill a story like that." But that's beside the point. Harvey Weinstein would and did —and he used Damon, and his reputation as a decent guy, to try to kill Waxman's story.

"I was never conscripted to do anything," says Damon. Except that he was. He was conscripted to leverage his reputation on behalf of Weinstein, to protect his.

Damon may have been an unwitting accomplice, but he was an accomplice all the same, and he should be furious with Weinstein about that.

He should be absolutely stricken that Weinstein convinced him to do this favor under the false pretenses; that Weinstein exploited their relationship in order to avoid exposure.

If he is, I don't detect it in his statement. In fact, I don't see any evidence that he realizes he was used in that way at all. I see a lot of implied blame directed at Waxman: She should have informed him of the nature of her piece, he insinuates, but Weinstein knew what the piece was about when he asked Damon to call her. Where's the blame for him?

Waxman only picked up the phone and answered when he called at Weinstein's request. She had no responsibility to disclose her angle. The responsibility for full disclosure rests exclusively with Weinstein, who enlisted Damon to try to shut her down specifically because of that angle.

In trying to defend himself, Damon is shielding Weinstein from the accountability for lying and for using him, even if unknowingly, to thwart a woman who was trying to hold him accountable.

He may not have knowingly colluded with Weinstein at the time, but what he's saying right now absolves Weinstein by decentering him. This isn't about Sharon Waxman and what she did or didn't do. It's about Harvey Weinstein — and the fact that he used Matt Damon to ensure he could keep assaulting women with impunity.

Damon needs to be angry about that.

Open Wide...

SO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT, REPUBLICANS

This segment from Chris Hayes' show last night, in which he's speaking to Vanity Fair correspondent Gabriel Sherman about a conversation he had with a prominent Republican about Donald Trump, is incredible:

[The tweet containing the video has been deleted, for reasons unknown, but below is a transcript I completed before it was removed.]

GABRIEL SHERMAN: I just wanted to, you know, sort of put into context the conversation I had with a very prominent Republican today, who literally was saying that they imagine General Kelly and Secretary Mattis have had conversations about if Trump lunged for the nuclear football, what would they do? Would they tackle him? I mean, literally, physically restrain him from putting the country at sort of perilous risk. And that is the kind of situation we're in, so, yes—

CHRIS HAYES: Wait, that's a conversation you had with a very senior Republican—

SHERMAN: Yes.

HAYES: —musing about what they would do.

SHERMAN: [A person] who knows about — who is talking about these are the conversations that, they have very good authority, are taking place inside the White House.
First of all, I would bet a small fortune that the "very prominent Republican" who conjured this scenario is John McCain. No one is more invested in the idea of Republicans doing something heroic to save us from the worst of their party than McCain, and no one does more to keep that a fantasy than McCain.

Which brings me to my point: The only use in spinning imaginary tales like this is to keep suggesting to the country, like Rex Tillerson, that the entire Republican party is SHOCKED and APPALLED by Donald Trump, OH DEAR, and get everyone talking about that, instead of demanding that the Republican majority do something meaningful to check and balance their reckless president.

Even if I believed for one moment, which I don't, that Kelly and Mattis would tackle Trump if he reached for the nuclear football, that is not their job. No one elected them to make those decisions.

And if you have any doubt that the Republican Party has lost every last shred of commitment to a healthy democracy, consider what's actually being suggested here: That the United States President's decisions be overruled by former military commanders.

As I just wrote yesterday, even if we believe that Trump's decisions are terrible, it is a complete abandonment of our democratic principles to root for him to be thwarted and disempowered.

The Republicans could draw up impeachment papers for Trump at any time. Instead, they spin fairy tales about effective military coups, to avoid doing anything themselves.

Open Wide...

Tillerson Isn't a Hero for Calling Trump a Disablist Slur

Over the past few days, we've heard that Secretary of State Rex Tillerson called Trump a "moron" (and, later, that he called him "a fucking moron"). Tillerson gave a press conference where he didn't deny it, and Trump called the whole thing fake news, but added that, if it weren't fake news, he'd challenge Tillerson to an I.Q. test and win.

So the nation is definitely in good hands.

This morning, Courtney Kube, Kristen Welker, Carol E. Lee, and Savannah Guthrie report at NBC News the precipitating event that evoked Tillerson's disablist commentary:

Donald Trump said he wanted what amounted to a nearly tenfold increase in the U.S. nuclear arsenal during a gathering this past summer of the nation's highest ranking national security leaders, according to three officials who were in the room.

Trump's comments, the officials said, came in response to a briefing slide he was shown that charted the steady reduction of U.S. nuclear weapons since the late 1960s. Trump indicated he wanted a bigger stockpile, not the bottom position on that downward-sloping curve.

According to the officials present, Trump's advisers, among them the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, were surprised.
They were surprised? Oh.


Tillerson used a gross disablist word to describe the president, which is bad enough on its own, but the leak (which he orchestrated, or at least approved) was deployed for a very specific purpose: To suggest to all of us that he's "surprised" (with the rest of "Trump's advisors") by the depths of Donald Trump's depravity.

And it has worked! I have seen far more laughing about Tillerson using that word to describe Trump than I have serious discussion about why Tillerson continues in the employ of someone he believes to be unfit for the office, and I've seen even less commentary about how absurd it is that Tillerson would claim to be surprised by the fact that Trump is a vile wreck.

It's obscene that Tillerson continues to abet Trump's malignant presidency despite having no faith in his competency or decency.

It doesn't make him some kind of hero who's standing on the line between a dangerous, reckless leader and all the rest of us. To the absolute contrary, it makes him an enabler of our potential collapse.

This is something the political press should be telling you. That they're not is an indication of where they continue to stand in relation to Donald Trump, the man they helped elect.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of a red couch

Hosted by a red sofa. Have a seat and chat.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Suggested by Shaker AmeliaEve: "Does your current profession reflect what you studied in school? Either way, how did you get to where you are now?"

My degree is in sociology and cultural anthropology, with minors in women's studies and political science. There was no such thing as blogging when I was at university — there was barely such a thing as the internet! — so I had no idea for what I was preparing, but it turned out to be this, lol.

Open Wide...

Men Who Are Bullies Hurt Women

[Content Note: Toxic masculinity; abuse.]

Harvey Weinstein is a serial sex predator, and lots of people who worked with him claim they didn't know.

Okay. For a moment, let's just take them at their word that they neither had personal knowledge of nor ever heard any of the loudly whispered rumors of Weinstein's decades-long predation and exploitation.

Then we're left with this: Decades of public reports about Weinstein's infamously rageful temper.

In 2002, Ken Auletta wrote a nearly 15,000-word piece for the New Yorker about Weinstein's behavior: "Those who have been witness to his outbursts, public and private, describe not a lovable rogue but, rather, a man with little self-control, whose tone of voice and whose body language can seem dangerous; at times, he appears about to burst with fury, his fists closed, his teeth clenched, his large head shaking as he loses the struggle to contain himself."

Auletta recounts anecdote after anecdote of Weinstein's abusive behavior threaded through strands of justification: He is a genius, passionate, a savvy businessman, an auteur. (In case you haven't heard.)

It is perhaps the most exhaustive — and exhausting — entry among the many submissions of similar theme, in the cottage industry that is (was) publishing articles about Weinstein's fiery temper, exposing the bully while simultaneously flattering him.

For at least 15 years, then, Weinstein's spectacular ill temper and shameless mistreatment of his collaborators has been known. Extensively documented.

And the observation I want to make is this: Men who behave like that abuse women.

Because I am 100% certified uncharitable, I state that as fact, without caveat or exception.

There doesn't exist a man who rages at his colleagues, humiliates his employees, does not believe there exists another human being who can earn permanent excusal from his withering contempt, and doesn't abuse women. Because women are part of that life. Professionally and personally. They are abused like men in the abusive mogul's orbit are abused.

And when it is also a man who, as George Clooney described Weinstein, "was very powerful [and] had a tendency to hit on young, beautiful women, sure," that man doesn't check his rage and bullying and entitlement at the door of his hotel suite.

He carries that with him everywhere. He carries it with him into his sexualized interactions with women.

Clooney also said:

Think about it this way, too: I had knock-down, drag-out fights with him over the years, but he was also making films that other studios weren't willing to make, and he was making films that everybody loved, so you just put up with certain bad behavior because you felt like, well, if he yells and screams but he gets Pulp Fiction made, who cares if he yells and screams? But it's a very different conversation when you say, it's not that he yells and screams but that he's cornering a young, scared lady in a restaurant and telling her to stand there and be quiet while he jerks off. That's a very different kind of behavior, and had that been a public thing, I think there would have been some different results. I hope there would be.
It's actually not a "very different kind of behavior" at all. To the absolute contrary, the behavior is exactly the same. What's different is that George Clooney is a man whom Weinstein viewed as a business associate, not a woman whom Weinstein viewed as an object for his consumption.

The problem isn't really that men (and women) of influence in the industry "didn't know" that Weinstein was sexually abusing women because they'd never seen evidence of it. The problem is that they didn't — like most people don't — understand that a powerful man with an outsized temper and a predilection for chasing women is inevitably abusing some of those women.

The problem is that we collectively refuse to admit we know that is true. That there simply aren't straight men who are lecherous bullies who aren't sexually assaulting women. That yelling and screaming and throwing public tantrums to get your way and forcing a woman to watch you jerk off into a potted plant really are the same behavior.

That it's far too easy to pretend it isn't when you aren't the one being cornered, but the one being asked to make the next great American film.

Open Wide...

"The future is coming. Arguably it is already here."

As y'all know, one of my bailiwicks is automation — specifically, the effect automation will have, and is already having, on the economy.

As I've previously noted, trucking is a sector about which I'm concerned: "Self-piloting vehicles will destroy entire sectors: Trucking, municipal driving jobs (garbage collection, street sweeping, leaf collection, snow plowing), delivery, driving services (taxis, Uber, Lyft). This is the reality of our past, it is our reality now, and it is the reality of our future."

Because it is a reality, it is something for which we simply must prepare.

At the Guardian, Dominic Rushe has an interesting piece about how members of the trucking industry are meeting that idea, or, in some cases, rejecting it.

As Rushe observes: "The future is coming. Arguably it is already here." Some of the truckers to whom he speaks agree; others think that automation won't decimate their industry now or ever; others seems to know there's no derailing the trajectory toward automation, but just hope their careers outlive the inevitable.

I feel for all of them.

And I feel for all the rest of us. Technology can't put 1.8 million Americans out of their jobs without serious consequences for the entire country.

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

"All [Trump] brought to Puerto Rico were those napkins. And you know what everyone's wondering? What we're expected to wipe with them: our asses, or our tears."—Puerto Rican resident Carlos J. Soto Lopez, father of two teenage girls, quoted by Jon Lee Anderson in his heartbreaking piece for the New Yorker, "How Many Puerto Ricans Will Leave Home After Hurricane Maria?"

[H/T to Eastsidekate.]

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Sophie the Torbie Cat sitting on the arm of the sofa near closed blinds
Sophie in early morning light.

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 264

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Here are some things in the news today:

Earlier today by me: I'm Starting to Suspect Electing Trump Was a Bad Idea.

[Content Note: Wildfires; displacement; death] Natasha Geiling at ThinkProgress: Northern California Firestorm 'Literally Exploded,' Killing 10 and Destroying Hundreds of Homes.
High temperatures and fast winds are fueling more than a dozen wildfires across California, forcing more than 20,000 northern California residents to evacuate their homes and communities. At least 10 people have died, and close to 100 could be missing, after several fires spread rapidly throughout Monday.

The fires ignited late Sunday night and into Monday morning and have since spread over 50,000 acres across Napa and Sonoma counties, destroying at least 1,500 structures and sending at least 100 to the hospital with injuries ranging from burns to smoke inhalation.

...The cause of the fires is still under investigation, but officials are confident windy conditions combined with an excess of dry grass and underbrush helped the fuel the fires' rapid growth. According to the National Weather Service, "fire literally exploded and raced along the landscape" aided by fuel at "all time record dry levels."

September and October tend to be the worst months for California's fire season, as strong winds can combine with low humidity and dry vegetation to turn a single spark into a major incident. ...Fast-moving winds and low humidity aren't rare in California, and neither are October wildfires, but it's likely climate change made these fires even more destructive.

...As climate change is fueling longer fire seasons, human activity — both through an intense focus on fire suppression, rather than forest management, and an decreasingly populated rural-urban boundary, are making fires more destructive and deadly.

...Unlike disasters like hurricanes or earthquakes, wildfires don't qualify for federal disaster funding under the Disaster Relief Act; instead, the Forest Service is forced to pay for fire suppression costs in excess of the budgeted amount by borrowing from other Forest Service programs. That means in especially active fire years, the Forest Service is taking money from programs meant to prevent fires and using those funds to fight existing fires.

...Even Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue has criticized the current funding structure of the Forest Service, saying in September that without a consistent stream of funding, "we're asking for disasters."
Emphasis mine.

My condolences to those who have lost family, friends, pets, neighbors, colleagues, and/or homes in the fires. I'm so sorry. I hope the people who have been injured have access to the healthcare they need to recover.

* * *

Robert Costa, Philip Rucker, and Ashley Parker at the Washington Post: A 'Pressure Cooker': Trump's Frustration and Fury Rupture Alliances, Threaten Agenda. "Frustrated by his Cabinet and angry that he has not received enough credit for his handling of three successive hurricanes, [Donald] Trump is now lashing out, rupturing alliances, and imperiling his legislative agenda, numerous White House officials and outside advisers said Monday. In a matter of days, Trump has torched bridges all around him, nearly imploded an informal deal with Democrats to protect young undocumented immigrants brought to the country as children, and plunged himself into the culture wars on issues ranging from birth control to the national anthem. In doing so, Trump is laboring to solidify his standing with his populist base and return to the comforts of his campaign."

On the one hand, I'm thrilled when Trump isn't able to enact his shitty agenda. On the other hand, an angry Trump is likely to do increasingly stupid and reckless things. Either way, we lose. There's just no upside to a Trump presidency.

And speaking of Trump pulling some bullshit because he feels cornered, isolated, and desperate for applause...


Paige Winfield Cunningham at the Washington Post: Trump Has a Backdoor Way to Lift Obamacare Regulations. "This week, his White House is finalizing an executive order to allow the formation of what's known as association health plans — something Trump recently promised to 'take care of a tremendous number of people' in the absence of a GOP replacement of the Affordable Care Act. ...In theory, letting people buy cheaper, leaner plans sounds great. Until you're diagnosed with a chronic condition or serious disease. ...'Allowing individuals or small groups to join plans that avoid those rules would likely result in the deterioration of the marketplaces,' Cori Uccello, a senior health fellow for the American Academy of Actuaries, told me."

So, not only is Trump planning to enact sweeping changes to healthcare (a major slice of the national economy) by fiat, but his plan is garbage. That sounds about right.

In other Trump administration healthcare news... Dr. Jen Gunter: Health and Human Services Wants to Define Life as Beginning at Conception. "The draft of the 2018-2022 strategic plan of the department of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) just dropped. The mission of HHS is 'to enhance the health and well-being of Americans, by providing for effective health and human services and by fostering sound, sustained advances in the sciences underlying medicine, public health, and social services.' Oh yeah now the mission also includes redefining life at conception. Really. Right on the introduction page."

Also, "there is a super cool section on how being able to practice your religion, like denying care and imposing your beliefs on patients, will be totally okay now. Obviously, this HHS revamp isn’t just aimed at women wanting birth control. ...Yes, the agency tasked with enhancing the 'health and well-being of Americans' now believes that certain religious beliefs are more important than health care. This could apply to contraception, abortion, vaccines, addiction medicine, sexually transmitted infection screening, and transgender care just to name a few."

Everything is fine. (Everything is not fine.)

* * *

[CN: Misogyny] Jack Moore at GQ: Stephen Miller Once Jumped into a Girls' Track Meet to Prove Men Are Athletically Superior to Women. "Whenever Donald Trump gives a speech and you find yourself thinking, 'I can't believe anyone could be this hateful,' there's a good chance that the man behind that speech was Stephen Miller, the prematurely balding 32-year-old who must have made a deal with the devil at some point wherein he traded his youth and morals for power. Well, The New York Times has a new profile of Miller that gives us a glimpse of his youth in liberal haven Santa Monica, California. And it turns out that he's always been just the absolute worst."

[CN: Nativism] Lachlan Markay, Asawin Suebsaeng, and Sam Stein at the Daily Beast: Stephen Miller Stayed in the Shadows to Kill His Boss' Deal. "For weeks, top officials to the president have been working behind the scenes to upend a DACA deal that [Donald] Trump had been struck with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi. And spearheading the campaign of behind-the-scenes impairment was White House senior policy adviser Stephen Miller." Just as I suspected.

Nicole Lafond at TPM: Bannon: 'We're Declaring War on the Republican Establishment'. "After calling on Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN) to resign over his criticism of [Donald] Trump, former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon said he is starting a 'coalition' to go after certain Republican members of Congress. 'We're declaring war on the Republican establishment,' he said, appearing on Fox News' Hannity Monday evening. ...He said Republicans like Corker are the reason he left the White House and vowed to 'go after them' in 2018. ...He said there will be about 15 names announced in the next several weeks of people who will be challenging incumbents, some of whom work in government and others who have served the Trump agenda as 'outsiders.' ...'We're going to cut off the oxygen to Mitch McConnell,' he said." Cool.

Hey, speaking of Nazis... [CN: White supremacy; violence; police misconduct]


That's certainly in keeping with the Trump administration having "declared 'black identity extremists' a violent threat, according to a leaked report from the FBI's counter-terrorism division."

Meanwhile...

[CN: Threats; harassment] George Ciccariello-Maher at the Washington Post: Conservatives Are the Real Campus Thought Police Squashing Academic Freedom. "I am by no means the first, and will not be the last target of this kind of smear campaign by conservatives aimed at academics. In every case, it is the same right-wing media outlets leading the charge, and campuses are increasingly the target. Universities and colleges have become the perfect target for such crusades: Purportedly hotbeds of multiculturalism, 'safe spaces." and political correctness, campuses represent everything the resentful right is afraid of. At the same time that the right-wing media smears professors like myself, decrying our tenure and demanding our heads, they breathlessly chronicle the supposed intolerance of the left when confronted with provocative campus tours by Yiannopoulos, Richard Spencer, Charles Murray, Ann Coulter, and others."

Conservative harassment mobs threatening discourse and academic freedom are terrifying enough, but...

Colleen Flaherty at Inside Higher Ed: White House Seeks Investigation into UNLV Professor. "An assistant professor of history at the University of Nevada at Las Vegas has apologized for blaming [Donald] Trump for the recent shooting massacre in the city after a student secretly recorded her comments and shared them with the Las Vegas Review-Journal. In the video, Tessa Winkelmann tells an upper-level class that when Trump was elected, she told students 'that some of us won't be affected by this presidency, but others are going to die.' Winkelmann says that Trump has 'threatened to declare violence against North Korea and other places' and that 'words, especially if they're coming from someone who is the president, have consequences.' ...Sarah Huckabee Sanders, White House press secretary, [said] that Winkelmann 'should be ashamed of herself, and the university should look into it. What a terrible example to set for students.'"

Oh yes! What a terrible example these professors are setting for their students by correctly noting that presidential policy has consequences. Instead, they should pretend that major cultural events are totally divorced from national politics. No one goes to college to learn critical thinking! "Everything happens in a vacuum, students! Everyone gets an A+. Have a nice semester smoking weed on the quad!"

Fucking hell. And the fact that the White House Press Secretary suggested Winkelman should be investigated is chilling. The intimidation of intellectuals is a central feature of authoritarian and fascist regimes. RED FLAG.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

Not All Men. But, You Know. A Lot.

[Content Note: Rape culture.]

Under the deservedly blunt Guardian headline "Hollywood men silent over Weinstein allegations as women speak out," Sam Levin and Julia Carrie Wong report:

Meryl Streep, Judi Dench, Kate Winslet, and dozens of other women in Hollywood have condemned the producer Harvey Weinstein amid a growing number of sexual harassment allegations. Most high-profile men in the industry, however, have remained silent.

...Shortly after the New York Times story went viral last week, many prominent women in Hollywood lent their voices in support of the accusers. Patricia Arquette, Amber Tamblyn, Olivia Munn, Lena Dunham, Brie Larson, Constance Wu, Rosie O'Donnell, America Ferrera, Jessica Chastain, and others tweeted soon after it published.

...The actors Seth Rogen and Mark Ruffalo have spoken up, but most male celebrities with ties to Weinstein have chosen not to comment, even after Weinstein was ousted from his own company.

The Guardian contacted representatives of actors who have starred in Weinstein films, including Ben Affleck, Matt Damon, Colin Firth, Bradley Cooper, Brad Pitt, Leonardo DiCaprio, Daniel Day-Lewis, Russell Crowe, George Clooney and Ewan McGregor, along with the directors Tarantino, Russell, Ryan Coogler, Tom Hooper, Lin-Manuel Miranda, Michael Moore, Rob Marshall, Robert Pulcini, Garth Davis, Doug McGrath, John Madden, Simon Curtis, Kevin Williamson, Martin Scorsese, John Hillcoat, and John Wells.

None commented, despite the fact that many have been vocal about gender equality in the industry and other social justice causes. Many have directly criticized Donald Trump amid similar accusations of sexual misconduct.
George Clooney eventually made a statement to the Daily Beast, in which he said Weinstein's behavior is "indefensible," but made sure to defended himself by saying: "We've had dinners, we've been on location together, we've had arguments. But I can tell you that I've never seen any of this behavior—ever."

Except, you know, he also had this to say: "A lot of people are doing the 'you had to know' thing right now, and yes, if you're asking if I knew that someone who was very powerful had a tendency to hit on young, beautiful women, sure. But I had no idea that it had gone to the level of having to pay off eight women for their silence, and that these women were threatened and victimized." Welp.

And Lin-Manuel Miranda tweeted this morning: "I'm as appalled and repulsed by the Weinstein news as anyone with a beating heart. And forever in awe of the bravery of those who spoke out."

One of the things I most hate when men finally do speak up is the ubiquitous sentiment, expressed here by Miranda, that "everyone" objects to sexual abuse. Like, obviously, duh. It's a way of suggesting that his silence until now (which he also blamed on having his staff curate his news) doesn't matter, because it should be self-evident that he objects, just like everyone else "with a beating heart."

Except not everyone objects to sexual abuse. Certainly not its perpetrators. Certainly not the people who helped keep Weinstein's abuse secret (from everyone but his victims and all of us who were paying attention). Certainly not the people who have been harassing the fuck out of any female survivor who has spoken out in solidarity with Weinstein's victims.

And certainly not the men who refuse to comment at all, even when asked directly. Or who do, reluctantly, but mostly just to have an opportunity to make excuses for themselves.

* * *

Note: Just after I finished writing this piece, Ronan Farrow's extensive article documenting his ten-month investigation into the allegations against Harvey Weinstein was made available online. Please be advised that there are multiple descriptions of sexual assault and harassment in the piece, which is incredibly difficult to read, but also an important document.

What's critically valuable about Farrow's piece is that we see, through survivors' own words, how the rape culture works — and how it is so devastatingly easy and for one man to manipulate its pieces to serve his disgusting agenda.

This article, because of Farrow's sensitivity to the subject matter and the safety he evidently provided to survivors who spoke with him, also makes abundantly clear that harm was Weinstein's objective. That he delighted in his sadism. That sexual violence is not a mistake.

I don't know how many times survivors speaking to a reporter for the corporate press have said they could see their abuser was turned on by their fear, but this is the first time I recall having read it.

My profound gratitude to the women who spoke to Ronan Farrow, and to him for the way he shared their stories.

Open Wide...

I'm Starting to Suspect Electing Trump Was a Bad Idea

Hahahahaha just kidding I have always known it would be a terrible idea, because I am not a cruel-witted dipshit who was first "entertained" by Donald Trump and then desperate to legitimize him in a cynical bid to conceal my previous shameful cavalierity about an evident tyrant whom I'd regarded as a clown.

But there are definitely people who are only now starting to realize, or admit, that electing Trump was a very bad idea. And having admonished us to "give him a chance," and then watching as he (predictably) blew every chance he's been given, they're now scrambling to reassure us that everything (the president) is under control.

Josh Dawsey at Politico: White House Aides Lean on Delays and Distraction to Manage Trump. "Publicly, the White House has pushed back against Tennessee Republican Sen. Bob Corker suggesting Trump must be managed like a toddler... But interviews with ten current and former administration officials, advisers, longtime business associates, and others close to Trump describe a process where they try to install guardrails for a president who goes on gut feeling — and many days are spent managing the president, just as Corker said."

Gabriel Sherman at Vanity Fair: Amid a Widening Rift, John Kelly Has a Mar-a-Lago Strategy to Contain Trump. "The next few weeks will surely test Trump and Kelly's relationship. As Kelly seeks to revive Trump's stalled tax plan, prevent the Iran nuclear deal from falling apart, and avoid war with North Korea, he'll also face the challenge of having to manage Trump at Mar-a-Lago. According to two sources, Kelly has developed a Mar-a-Lago strategy to prevent Trump from soliciting advice from members and friends. ...The plan looks sound on paper—but, to his staff, Trump can be a formidable adversary."

Trump is an "adversary" to his own staff. His party knows he's unfit. And this containment strategy is dubious, at best, give that Trump's handlers are either totally ineffective or just as reckless as he is.

At the Atlantic, David Frum (with whom I can't believe I'm so frequently in agreement these days, although rest assured he still hates feminists, so the world hasn't completely spun off its axis yet) details the major problem with the Trump containment strategy, which will probably sound familiar:

The national-security services are apparently coping with Donald Trump in ways that circumvent the president's constitutional role as commander-in-chief.

...We've seen the president issue threats of imminent military action—only to be contradicted by cabinet officers and military staff assuring potential adversaries that the United States will not initiate the use of force that the president had threatened to initiate.

The military and intelligence agencies are learning new habits of disregard for presidential statements and even orders that those agencies deem ignorant or reckless. By and large, those agencies' judgments are vastly to be preferred to the president's—but that does not make these habits any less dangerous.

Among other insights, Corker's Sunday interview forces Americans to confront some tough questions: By what methods is the president being contained?

...Thank you and congratulations to those officials struggling to protect American security, the Western alliance, and world peace against Donald Trump. But the constitutional order is becoming the casualty of these struggles. The Constitution provides a way to remedy an unfit presidency: the removal process under the 25th amendment. Regencies and palace coups are not constitutional. I dare say many readers would prefer a Mattis presidency to a Trump presidency. But to stealthily endow Secretary Mattis with the powers of the presidency as a work-around of Trump's abuse of them? That's a crisis, too, and one sinister for the future.
I have long been raising similar concerns regarding leaking and what has effectively become dueling coups between the Trump administration and the national security bureaucrats. There is a common theme of: I don't care what their short-term motives or the long-term consequences are, as long as they're aligning with us against Trump. But that is very dangerous thinking.

And it's dangerous for a number of reasons, most of all that it is wholly incompatible with a healthy democracy. There is no simpler explanation of that than this:


The root of the problem is having elected Donald Trump with the undemocratic influence of the Electoral College and the undemocratic interference of a foreign adversary.

The solution to that cannot, must not, be undemocratic rule.

If that is our best and only solution, we've already lost what we're ostensibly keen to protect.

Open Wide...

World Mental Health Day


The theme of this year's World Mental Health Day is mental health and the workplace, which has special significance to me this year, given the amount of anxiety currently associated with my work.

And I know I'm not alone, whether one works in politics or not. Frankly, I think that U.S. politics — specifically the presidency of Donald Trump — has had deleterious effects for the mental health of countless people around the world.

I realize that sounds like a joke, because many people jokingly make similar observations, but I am not joking: Every person I know has more stress, anxiety, and/or depression as a result of this administration, its malice, and the relentless hatred it has unleashed and empowered.

So, here's a space to talk about that, if you want and need one. Or how your own workplace affects your mental health. Or your mental health generally.

[If you are having urgent thoughts of self-harm, do not leave a comment; please contact emergency services immediately.]

Open Wide...

Open Thread

Hosted by a turquoise sofa. Have a seat and chat.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Suggested by Shaker wakeuptothemoon: "What is your favorite font?"

Avant Garde. Which is why I use its more widely available sister font Century Gothic a lot — including in the current banner, for instance.

Open Wide...

The Monday Blogaround

This blogaround brought to you by raindrops on a window.

Recommended Reading:

Princess Weekes: [Content Note: Violent white supremacy] F*ck You Christopher Columbus

Smith Surasmith: [CN: Nativism] For All Our Dreamers

Lance Mannion: First American-Made Thought After Seeing American Made: If a Republican Does It, It's Not Wrong

Catherine Lizette Gonzalez: [CN: Trans hatred; anti-trans violence] The Death and Life of Marsha P. Johnson Celebrates the Black Trans Revolutionary's Activism and Tries to Solve the Mystery of Her Death

Dell Cameron: Whole Foods Is Still Being Overly Secretive About Its Credit Card Breach

Lux Alptraum: Five Massive Orgasm Myths

Leave your links and recommendations in comments. Self-promotion welcome and encouraged!

Open Wide...