Meanwhile, on Twitter...

[Content Note: Sexual assault.]

This tweet begins a very good thread. You should read it! (Really.)


One not-insignificant note, though:

Open Wide...

Northern California Wildfires Thread

[Content Note: Fire; displacement; death. Video may autoplay at first two links.]

Fourteen fires, the cause(s) of which are still under investigation, have torn across eight counties in North California since last night, displacing thousands of people, damaging thousands of structures, and killing at least one person.

Sonali Kohli, Javier Panzar, and Paige St. John at the LA Times report: "The vast devastation over just a few hours made this firestorm one of the worst in California history, with Gov. Jerry Brown declaring a state of emergency. ...One of the raging fires had Santa Rosa under siege Monday morning, with a large swath of the city north of downtown under evacuation order. ...While many evacuation centers were set up, some were filled to capacity due to the large number of people fleeing. ...Residents described running from the approaching flames early in the morning."

Peter Fimrite, Jill Tucker, Kurtis Alexander, and Demian Bulwa at the San Francisco Chronicle report that the firest have turned "wide swaths of the Wine Country into wastelands of twisted metal and ash as firefighters sought to contain flames super-charged by powerful winds. ...'This is an incredibly fast-moving and dynamic fire,' [Dave Shew, a Cal Fire spokesperson] said. 'We had real severe winds last night when this started. So it burned very, very fast. Our No. 1 priority was life safety. There are some neighborhoods that got hit pretty hard with structures lost. This is an ongoing situation that is not only going to last days but weeks.'"

I wish I had something better to say to people in the affected areas beyond offering my profound sympathies. This is going to be absolutely devastating for a lot of people — and animals — and I am so very sorry.

It's a little early at this point to know exactly how to help: Firefighters are still working on trying to contain and/or extinguish the fires; people are still being evacuated with uncertainty about what damage might be done to their communities.

But, as always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share ideas for helping in comments, and let's keep this an image-free thread. Thanks.

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Matilda the Fuzzy Sealpoint Cat lying on the couch, leaning toward Olivia the White Farm Cat, who is lying beside her
"Hey, Livs — do you ever think about Tony, wonder where he could be, who he is with, what he is thinking, if he is thinking of me, and whether he'll ever return someday?"

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 263

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Here are some things in the news today:

Earlier today by me: From Puerto Rico: "WE NEED WATER!" and Trump Will Only Agree to Protect Some Kids If He's Allowed to Harm Others.

Martin Pengelly and Ben Jacobs at the Guardian: Bob Corker: White House Is 'Adult Day Care Center' and Trump May Start WWIII. "Donald Trump's fractious relationship with the Republican establishment reached a bizarre new level on Sunday when Senator Bob Corker described the White House as an 'adult day care center' and warned that the president risked setting the US 'on the path to World War III.' An extraordinary exchange between Trump and the chair of the Senate foreign relations committee began when Trump accused Corker, who is retiring, of 'not having the guts' to run for re-election. In response, Corker tweeted: 'It's a shame the White House has become an adult day care center. Someone obviously missed their shift this morning.'"

[Content Note: Video may autoplay at link] Paola Chavez and Rick Klein at ABC News: What's Dangerously Serious About Trump's Feud with Corker. "Sen. Bob Corker's public feud with [Donald] Trump is no mere war of words, even in the Trumpian insult era. Corker is blowing the lid off of months of private frustrations and worries, harbored by erstwhile allies of the president, that the commander-in-chief is reckless, dishonest, and could put the nation 'on the path to World War III,' as Corker told The New York Times' Jonathan Martin. 'He would have to concern anyone who cares about our nation,' Corker said. Combine that with the tensions between Trump and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, and Trump and Chief of Staff John Kelly, and this has far bigger consequences than your typical Twitter feud. Just words? Perhaps. But they are words that are spurring confrontation with a nuclear-armed North Korea, and more words will come this week that could lead Iran to restart its own nuclear program."

James Hohmann at the Washington Post: Bob Corker Tirade Encapsulates Five Reasons Why Trump Has Failed at Governing. "Corker said that his concerns about Trump's ability to govern are shared by nearly every Republican in the Senate. 'Look, except for a few people, the vast majority of our caucus understands what we're dealing with here,' he told the Times. 'Of course they understand the volatility that we're dealing with and the tremendous amount of work that it takes by people around him to keep him in the middle of the road.'"

Which actually just underscores what craven, opportunistic, disloyal scoundrels the Republican Senate caucus is! They understand what a dangerous dirtbag Trump is, but they're still carrying water for him.

* * *

[CN: Video may autoplay at link] Lesley Stahl at CBS News: Facebook "Embeds," Russia, and the Trump Campaign's Secret Weapon.
[Brad Parscale] was hired to run the [Trump campaign's] digital team, but over time came to oversee advertising, data collection, and much of the fund-raising. As digital director, he's being drawn into the investigation of whether the campaign colluded with the Russians in the election.

...In the beginning of the campaign he worked alone at home in San Antonio, but by the end he had 100 people reporting to him. One of his main jobs was to send out carefully-tailored, low-cost digitals ads to millions of people.

...Lesley Stahl: One of the best things Facebook did for you, I heard, was penetrate the rural vote. Is that correct?

Brad Parscale: Yeah. So Facebook now lets you get to places and places possibly that you would never go with TV ads. Now, I can find, you know, 15 people in the Florida Panhandle that I would never buy a TV commercial for. And, we took opportunities that I think the other side didn't.

Lesley Stahl: Like what?

Brad Parscale: Well, we had our— their staff embedded inside our offices.

Lesley Stahl: What?

Brad Parscale: Yeah, Facebook employees would show up for work every day in our offices.

Lesley Stahl: Whoa, wait a minute. Facebook employees showed up at the Trump headquarters—

Brad Parscale: Google employees, and Twitter employees.

Lesley Stahl: They were embedded in your campaign?

Brad Parscale: I mean, like, they were there multiple days a week, three, four days a week, two days week, five days a week—

Lesley Stahl: What were they doing inside? I mean—

Brad Parscale: Helping teach us how to use their platform. I wanna get—

Lesley Stahl: Helping him get elected?

Brad Parscale: I asked each one of them by email, I wanna know every, single secret button, click, technology you have. "I wanna know everything you would tell Hillary's campaign plus some. And I want your people here to teach me how to use it."

Lesley Stahl: Inside?

Brad Parscale: Yeah, I want 'em sittin' right next to us—

Lesley Stahl: How do you know they weren't Trojan Horses?

Brad Parscale: 'Cause I'd ask 'em to be Republicans, and I'd— we'd talk to 'em.

Lesley Stahl: Oh, you only wanted Republicans?

Brad Parscale: I wanted people who support Donald Trump from their companies.

Lesley Stahl: And that's what you got?

Brad Parscale: Yeah.
Elizabeth Dwoskin and Adam Entous at the Washington Post: Google Uncovers Russian-Bought Ads on YouTube, Gmail, and Other Platforms. "The Silicon Valley giant has found that tens of thousands of dollars were spent on ads by Russian agents who aimed to spread disinformation across Google's many products, which include YouTube, as well as advertising associated with Google search, Gmail, and the company's DoubleClick ad network... The discovery by Google is also significant because the ads do not appear to be from the same Kremlin-affiliated troll farm that bought ads on Facebook — a sign that the Russian effort to spread disinformation online may be a much broader problem than Silicon Valley companies have unearthed so far."

[CN: Misogyny; Islamophobia] Ben Collins, Gideon Resnick, and Spencer Ackerman at the Daily Beast: Russia Recruited YouTubers to Bash 'Racist B*tch' Hillary Clinton over Rap Beats. "According to the YouTube page for 'Williams and Kalvin,' the Clintons are 'serial killers who are going to rape the whole nation.' Donald Trump can't be racist because he's a 'businessman.' Hillary Clinton's campaign was 'fund[ed] by the Muslim.' These are a sample of the videos put together by two Black video bloggers calling themselves Williams and Kalvin Johnson, whose social media pages investigators say are part of the broad Russian campaign to influence American politics. Across Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube, they purported to offer 'a word of truth' to African-American audiences. ...Williams and Kalvin's content was pulled from Facebook in August after it was identified as a Russian government-backed propaganda account."

Craig Timberg at the Washington Post: Russian Operatives Used Twitter and Facebook to Target Veterans and Military Personnel, Study Says. "Russian trolls and others aligned with the Kremlin are injecting disinformation into streams of online content flowing to American military personnel and veterans on Twitter and Facebook, according to an Oxford University study released Monday. The researchers found fake or slanted news from Russian-controlled accounts are mixing with a wide range of legitimate content consumed by veterans and active-duty personnel in their Facebook and Twitter news feeds. ...In some cases, the disinformation reached the friends and families of military personnel and veterans as well, the researchers said."


Oh.

Rosalind S. Helderman at the Washington Post: Newly Disclosed Email Sheds Light on Trump Jr. Meeting with Russian Lawyer. "A newly disclosed email sent on the morning of a Trump Tower meeting held during last year's presidential campaign between Donald Trump Jr. and a Russian lawyer raises new questions about how the key session came together. The note was written by the Russian lawyer and sent to a music promoter who had helped arrange the session." In sum, the "newly discovered" email appears to show the meeting being set up only to discuss the Magnitsky Act, not to share information about Hillary Clinton, as Don Jr's published emails show. So, not so much "shedding light" on the meeting as much as suggesting that people on one side of this meeting were maybe more sophisticated than the others, ahem, if no more ethical.

* * *

[CN: Torture]


[CN: War on agency]


[CN: Video may autoplay at link] Daniel Dale at the Toronto Star: Trump Defends Tossing Paper Towels to Puerto Rico Hurricane Victims. This entire article is very much worth your time to read in its entirety, but this bit is truly something:
Trump, as he so often does, called the media "fake." And then he, it seemed, took credit for coining the word "fake."

"I think one of the greatest of all terms I've come up with is 'fake.' I guess other people have used it, perhaps, over the years, but I've never noticed it," he said.

Trump would not have even been correct if he meant to refer specifically to the phrase "fake news."
I mean.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

Trump Will Only Agree to Protect Some Kids If He's Allowed to Harm Others

[Content Note: Nativism; white supremacy; violence.]

Donald Trump has indicated he might dial back his decision to end DACA, but only in exchange for an absolutely ridiculous and heinous set of concessions from Democrats. Michael D. Shear at the New York Times reports:

The White House on Sunday delivered to Congress a long list of hard-line immigration measures that [Donald] Trump is demanding in exchange for any deal to protect the young undocumented immigrants known as Dreamers, imperiling a fledgling bipartisan push to reach a legislative solution.

Before agreeing to provide legal status for 800,000 young immigrants brought here illegally as children, Mr. Trump will insist on the construction of a wall across the southern border, the hiring of 10,000 immigration agents, tougher laws for those seeking asylum, and denial of federal grants to "sanctuary cities," officials said.

The White House is also demanding the use of the E-Verify program by companies to keep [undocumented] immigrants from getting jobs, an end to people bringing their extended family into the United States, and a hardening of the border against thousands of children fleeing violence in Central America. Such a move would shut down loopholes that encourage parents from Guatemala, El Salvador, and Honduras to send their children illegally into the United States, where many of them melt into American communities and become undocumented immigrants.
Just to be abundantly clear: Children fleeing widespread, deadly violence are not "illegals." They are refugees. And instead of welcoming children who make perilous journeys fraught with the threat of death, sexual violence, exposure, and hunger — and only the children fortunate enough to survive these threats — to the relative safety of this nation, the president wants to make sure they are kept out, as part of a deal to protect those already here.

This is just unfathomably cruel.

And it is, of course, just one of many of Trump's vile demands: "[T]he proposals, taken together, amount to a Christmas-in-October wish list for immigration hard-liners inside the White House." Indeed. Which is why one suspects this filthy laundry list has Stephen Miller's nasty fingerprints all over it. Steve Bannon may be gone, but his protege remains. And is frighteningly influential.

This administration routinely traffics in unrelenting malice, but perhaps nothing more clearly and simply underlines the depths of its depravity than this effort to create a literal Sophie's Choice between which set of vulnerable children the people obliged to negotiate with this sadist want to protect from his abuse.

Open Wide...

From Puerto Rico: "WE NEED WATER!"

Yesterday, San Juan Mayor Carmen Yulín Cruz spent the day tweeting about the desperate situation in Puerto Rico. "WE NEED WATER" she tweeted over and over, following that by tweeting about the lack of response from FEMA as hospitals trasferred patients due to power outages.


FEMA Administrator Brock Long appeared on This Week, during which he bluntly said that FEMA is indeed not listening to Carmen Yulín Cruz, because she's just creating "political noise."

LONG: We filtered out the mayor a long time ago. We don't have time for the political noise.

The bottom line is, is that, um, we are making progress every day, in conjunction with the governor. And, uh, in regards to the power failure, we're restringing a very fragile system every day. As we make progress, simple thunderstorms pass through, knock the progress out.

Um, rebuilding — rebuilding Puerto Rico is gonna be a greater conversation for the Congress in conjunction with the governor on how they're, you know, what the way forward is in the future of Puerto Rico.

But in regards to the power outages and the hospitals, we built an entire 911 system; we monitor the hospital system daily. And so, if there is a power failure at a hospital, which we've seen two of, um, you know, over this past week, we're actually life-flighting the ICU patients out of those hospitals onto the USS Comfort, and we continue to stabilize that situation with hospitals.

But as far as the political noise, we filter that out, keep our heads down, and continue to make progress — and, uh, push forward to restoring essential functions for Puerto Rico.
So not only does Long dismiss Cruz's concerns about access to clean water and maintaining power at hospitals as "political noise," but he implies that said "political noise" is somehow an impediment to the work of restoring essential functions; that Cruz is obliging them to "keep their heads down" to avoid being deterred by her distracting articulation of concerns facing the people she represents.

Additionally, Long seems to reiterate the implication made by Donald Trump that the federal government might decide not to rebuild Puerto Rico at all if it's too costly. These comments from the administration are always couched in frames about "figuring out a way forward with Congress" or whatever, but what a thin veneer that is stretched over the thick suggestion of potential abandonment and neglect.

Shame on this entire administration — and that includes Mike Pence, who (as per usual) is skating by without criticism, despite the fact that the nation's foremost preening Christian self-hagiographer is busily engaging in white supremacist stunts rather than advocating for life-saving interventions on behalf of 3.4 million Americans in Puerto Rico.

Just like Jesus would do.

Open Wide...

This F#@king Guy


That's really all I have to say about that.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of a purple sofa

Hosted by a purple sofa. Have a seat and chat.

Open Wide...

The Virtual Pub Is Open

image of a pub Photoshopped to be named 'The Beloved Community Pub'
[Explanations: lol your fat. pathetic anger bread. hey your gay.]

Belly up to the bar,
and be in this space together.

Open Wide...

The Friday Blogaround

This blogaround brought to you by kelly green.

Recommended Reading:

Mikki Kendall: The Right to Bear Arms vs Everything

Meredith Wadman: [Content Note: Sexual harassment; misogynist slurs; abuse] A Cold Case: Disturbing Allegations of Sexual Harassment in Antarctica Leveled at Noted Scientist

Daniel Rivero and Laura Juncadella: Pennsylvania Sues Student Loan Giant for Predatory Practices

Amie Newman: Let's Talk About Sex — and Reproductive Justice

TLC: [CN: Trans hatred] In Vicious Memo, DOJ Encourages Illegal Discrimination Against Transgender Workers

Vivian Kane: [CN: Street harassment] This Woman Takes Selfies with the Men Who Catcall Her — and It's Both Badass and Disturbing

Sameer Rao: Nina Simone, Sister Rosetta Tharpe Nominated for Rock and Roll Hall of Fame

Jacob Kastrenakes: AIM Will Shut Down After 20 Years

Iveta: [CN: Moving GIF at link] If You Ever Feel Sad, These 10+ Highland Cattle Calves Will Make You Smile

Leave your links and recommendations in comments. Self-promotion welcome and encouraged!

Open Wide...

FYI

screen cap from Rihanna's 'Umbrealla' video, in which she is holding up a black umbrella, to which I've added text reading: 'Rihanna asked me to let you know now that it's raining more than ever, you can stand under her umbrella ella ella eh eh eh eh.'

[Previous FYI: Rick Astley; Eddie Murphy; The Eurythmics; Eddie Rabbit; Sinéad O'Connor; Was (Not Was); Bon Jovi; Kenny Rogers; Bobby McFerrin; Starship; Dead or Alive; Right Said Fred; Edie Brickell and the New Bohemians; Salt n Pepa; Nelson; The Cure; The Soup Dragons; Europe/BushCo; Elton John; Eddie Money; Human League; Glenn Frey; Van Halen; Alanis Morissette; Depeche Mode; The Beatles; The Proclaimers; Bruce Springsteen; Meat Loaf; Cyndi Lauper; Cole Porter; Tina Turner; The Jets; Starland Vocal Band; Kenny Loggins; Gloria Estefan; Martha Reeves & The Vandellas; Rebecca Black; Queen. Hint: They're better if you click 'em!]

Open Wide...

"There's No Ethics."

[Content Note: Emotional abuse.]

This piece by Paul Lewis at the Guardian is one of the most chilling things I've read in quite some time (which is really saying something): 'Our Minds Can Be Hijacked': The Tech Insiders Who Fear a Smartphone Dystopia.

It's chilling for a whole lot of reasons, including the fact that not a single woman was interviewed for the piece. (Former Facebook project manager Leah Pearlman is mentioned, but not quoted.) That Silicon Valley and its tech is overwhelmingly controlled by (mostly white) men is hardly news, but the absence of women's voices in this piece was particularly stark to me, for reasons I trust are evident.

The entire piece is a must-read, but two passages in particular stood out to me, which I want to highlight. First, this:

The techniques these companies use are not always generic: they can be algorithmically tailored to each person. An internal Facebook report leaked this year, for example, revealed that the company can identify when teens feel "insecure," "worthless," and "need a confidence boost." Such granular information, Harris adds, is "a perfect model of what buttons you can push in a particular person."

Tech companies can exploit such vulnerabilities to keep people hooked; manipulating, for example, when people receive "likes" for their posts, ensuring they arrive when an individual is likely to feel vulnerable, or in need of approval, or maybe just bored. And the very same techniques can be sold to the highest bidder. "There's no ethics," he says.
Fucking hell. I am pretty damn cynical and even I never considered that Facebook might be waiting to deliver likes until they perceive that one "needs" them.

And if you're a person who has come to be dependent on likes in order to boost your mood, then, by withholding those likes, Facebook is potentially putting you in a down mood, thus controlling your emotions by strategically deploying notifications.

Which only increases one's need for feedback.

I'm hardly the only person who has noted that allowing abuse to run rampant on their platforms seems to be a central part of social media companies' business strategy — and here we see why that is: Failing to police harassment increases the likelihood of creating among targeted users an emotional state in which a positive boost would be welcome.

That is: "Likes" have more weight if Nazis are abundant on the platform.

And then there's this:
Since the US election, [James Williams, a former Google strategist who built the metrics system for the company's global search advertising business and is now pursuing a doctorate at Oxford exploring the ethics of persuasive design] has explored another dimension to today's brave new world. If the attention economy erodes our ability to remember, to reason, to make decisions for ourselves — faculties that are essential to self-governance — what hope is there for democracy itself?

"The dynamics of the attention economy are structurally set up to undermine the human will," he says. "If politics is an expression of our human will, on individual and collective levels, then the attention economy is directly undermining the assumptions that democracy rests on." If Apple, Facebook, Google, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat are gradually chipping away at our ability to control our own minds, could there come a point, I ask, at which democracy no longer functions?

"Will we be able to recognise it, if and when it happens?" Williams replies. "And if we can't, then how do we know it hasn't happened already?"
Welp.

[H/T to Shaker SKM.]

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Zelda the Black and Tan Mutt lying on her back on the sofa, resting up against my butt, as I'm lying on my side; she has a silly little grin on her face
LOLOLOLOL THIS DOG! Just look at the expression on her face! ♥

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 260

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Here are some things in the news today:

Earlier today by me: Trump Suggests a Foreign Policy "Storm" Is Coming and The 2016 Election Result Simply Never Should Have Been Certified.

[Content Note: White supremacy; misogyny] Joseph Bernstein at BuzzFeed: Here's How Breitbart and Milo Smuggled Nazi and White Nationalist Ideas into the Mainstream.
For more than a year, Yiannopoulos led [conservative news site Breitbart] in a coy dance around the movement's nastier edges, writing stories that minimized the role of neo-Nazis and white nationalists while giving its politer voices "a fair hearing." In March, Breitbart editor Alex Marlow insisted "we're not a hate site." Breitbart's media relations staff repeatedly threatened to sue outlets that described Yiannopoulos as racist. And after the violent white supremacist protest in Charlottesville, Virginia, in August, Breitbart published an article explaining that when Bannon said the site welcomed the alt-right, he was merely referring to "computer gamers and blue-collar voters who hated the GOP brand."

These new emails and documents, however, clearly show that Breitbart does more than tolerate the most hate-filled, racist voices of the alt-right. It thrives on them, fueling and being fueled by some of the most toxic beliefs on the political spectrum — and clearing the way for them to enter the American mainstream.
There is much, much more at the link, and I highly recommend reading the entire thing. A few quick observations:

1. This strongly tracks with the story published yesterday in the Stranger, which I excerpted in yesterday's We Resist thread, in which David Lewis reported that white supremacists were strategizing to "move into positions of power where they can hire other racists and keep non-whites from getting into the company." See, for example, in the BuzzFeed piece "Mitchell Sunderland, a senior staff writer at Broadly, Vice's women's channel." White supremacists insinuating themselves at ostensibly feminist outlets must be the bestest joke (to them) ever, especially since women's warnings about these assholes were ignored.

2. To that point, many of the dudes mentioned in this piece as infamous white supremacists were first known (to women) as anti-feminists, because they got their start harassing women online. Women have been raising red flags about these Nazi fucks for years, but we were dismissed, discounted, admonished to "just ignore them," told that our harassment was just the cost of being a woman online.

3. I can't emphasize this enough: This is a pattern akin to violent men who have a history of domestic violence. It always starts with hurting women. Abusing us is like the canary in the coal mine. It's a test, to see what they can get away with, and a largely invisible testing ground to perfect their crafts of abuse and gaslighting.

Listen to women.

* * *

[Content Note: War on agency] Robert Pear at the New York Times: Trump Administration Set to Roll Back Birth Control Mandate. "The Trump administration is poised to roll back the federal requirement for employers to include birth control coverage in their health insurance plans, vastly expanding exemptions for those that cite moral or religious objections. The new rules, which could be issued as soon as Friday, fulfill a campaign promise by [Donald] Trump and are sure to touch off a round of lawsuits on the issue. More than 55 million women have access to birth control without co-payments because of the contraceptive coverage mandate, according to a study commissioned by the Obama administration. Under the new regulations, hundreds of thousands of women could lose birth control benefits they now receive at no cost under the Affordable Care Act."

I'm just going to keep reposting this tweet forever and ever.


[CN: War on agency] Ellie Langford at Rewire: Don't Be Fooled: The Goal of the 20-Week Ban Is to Stop Abortion for Good.
The bill Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives passed Tuesday would ban abortion after 20 weeks. Medical professionals, women, and families alike know that this type of restriction is one of the cruelest pieces of legislation around. A ban on abortion after 20 weeks will disproportionately hurt those facing some of the most complex situations imaginable. People seek this care later in pregnancy for a variety of reasons, including medical problems, difficulty accessing services, and the fear that comes with rape, incest, and abuse. Furthermore, abortions performed later in pregnancy are rare and represent only 1.5 percent of total abortion procedures in this country—a tiny portion. Taking away those options when they are most needed is the wrong thing to do.

Despite how damaging this legislation would be if signed into law—and despite how many other pressing issues desperately need to be addressed—the anti-choice GOP went ahead and scheduled the vote anyway. The reason why is simple: This legislation is meant to placate a fringe base that's angry their party has barely gotten anything done. But it's also a priority of aggressive anti-choice activists who view the bill as one step on the pathway to a total ban on abortion.
Rage. Seethe. Boil.

[CN: Guns] Addy Baird at ThinkProgress: How the NRA and the Far-Right Are Quietly Mobilizing to Kill Gun Safety Reform After Vegas. "Thursday's statement is likely part of a wider strategy on the part of some conservatives: As long as the NRA is talking about bump stocks, they don't have to talk about assault rifles. ...Gun advocates have certainly been doing their best to draw attention to other issues by offering distracting, if easily debunked, alternative talking points." I will never understand this shit.


Juliet Eilperin at the Washington Post: As ACA Enrollment Nears, Administration Keeps Cutting Federal Support of the Law. "Supporters of the Affordable Care Act see the president's opposition even to changes sought by conservative states as part of a broader campaign by his administration to undermine the 2010 health-care law. In addition to trying to cut funding for the ACA, the Trump administration also is hampering state efforts to control premiums. ...And with the fifth enrollment season set to begin Nov. 1, advocates say the Health and Human Services Department has done more to suppress the number of people signing up than to boost it. HHS has slashed grants to groups that help consumers get insurance coverage, for example. It also has cut the enrollment period in half, reduced the advertising budget by 90 percent, and announced an outage schedule that would make the HealthCare.gov website less available than last year." Scumbags.

* * *

Betsy Woodruff at the Daily Beast: Exclusive: Senate 'Russia Probe' Is Not Investigating Russia. "Nearly a year after Election Day, a host of investigators are working on probes specifically digging into how Russia meddled in the presidential election, who — if anyone — they colluded with in the U.S., and what they are still doing now. The Senate Intelligence Committee is investigating, the House Intelligence Committee is investigating, and the Justice Department is investigating too, through special counsel Bob Mueller. But Grassley's committee is not part of that. The Grassley staffer told The Daily Beast that the Judiciary Committee's investigators are focused on the FBI."

As I've been saying, the GOP majority was never going to allow Congressional investigations to do anything but carry water for Trump and his cronies. There are no patriots to be found among the Republican caucus — not anymore. This, among other reasons, is why I continually urge caution in getting one's hopes up regarding accountability for Trump.

Trust that Bob Mueller is getting an enormous amount of pressure from these stooges to soft-pedal whatever he finds, especially with regard to Trump. This is why I am nervous about the appearance of Manafort being made a fall guy. I don't think Mueller is corrupt, but I know he's a human being under intense scrutiny and pressure. It may look easier, at some point, to settle for Manafort.

I hope that is not and is never the case. But I don't trust the Republicans not to be using every bit of their power to try to make that happen.

* * *

Jenna Johnson at the Washington Post: FEMA Removes Statistics About Drinking Water Access and Electricity in Puerto Rico from Website. "As of Wednesday, half of Puerto Ricans had access to drinking water and 5 percent of the island had electricity, according to statistics published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency on its Web page documenting the federal response to Hurricane Maria. By Thursday morning, both of those key metrics were no longer on the Web page." Instead, it's only stats like "64 percent of wastewater treatment plants are working on generator power," that "illustrate [Donald] Trump's assertions that the island is quickly making tremendous strides toward full recovery."

Taegan Goddard at Political Wire: Trump Nominates Coal Lobbyist to Be No. 2 at EPA. "'Trump nominated Andrew Wheeler, a coal lobbyist with links to outspoken deniers of established science on climate change, to help lead the Environmental Protection Agency,' the New York Times reports. 'The nomination comes at a critical moment for the E.P.A. as the agency prepares to repeal a sweeping climate change regulation known as the Clean Power Plan.'" Obviously.

Josh Dawsey, Emily Stephenson, and Andrea Peterson at Politico: John Kelly's Personal Cellphone Was Compromised, White House Believes. "White House officials believe that chief of staff John Kelly's personal cellphone was compromised, potentially as long ago as December, according to three U.S. government officials. The discovery raises concerns that hackers or foreign governments may have had access to data on Kelly's phone while he was secretary of Homeland Security and after he joined the West Wing." Sure.

Mike Allen and Jonathan Swan at Axios: CIA Director Pompeo Considered to Replace Tillerson. "Trump advisers and allies are floating the idea of replacing Secretary of State Rex Tillerson with CIA Director Mike Pompeo, age 53 — someone who's already around the table in the Situation Room, and could make the switch without chaos. We're told that Trump is quite comfortable with Pompeo, asking his advice on topics from immigration to the inner workings of Congress. Pompeo personally delivers the President's Daily Brief, making him one of the few people Trump spends a great deal of time with on a daily basis. Pompeo is one of the few in the administration who knows how to convey tough news to the president, and how to push back without turning DJT off. (SecDef Mattis is good at that, too.) Trump doesn't see Pompeo as a showboat." Okay.

Noor Al-Sibai at Raw Story: Taxpayers Spent More Than $800,000 on Treasury Sec. Mnuchin's military Flights. "Former Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price resigned less than a week ago after costing taxpayers over $1 million in private and military flights. Now, according to the Treasury Department's inspector general, Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin may catch up to him with the more than $800,000 he's spent on seven military flights." Cool.

Sounds like everything's going great in the Trump administration, as per usual. Just a super group of white dudes serving the country well.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

Shaker Gourmet

Whatcha been cooking up in your kitchen lately, Shakers?

Share your favorite recipes, solicit good recipes, share recipes you've recently tried, want to try, are trying to perfect, whatever! Whether they're your own creation, or something you found elsewhere, share away.

Also welcome: Recipes you've seen recently that you'd love to try, but haven't yet!

Open Wide...

The 2016 Election Result Simply Never Should Have Been Certified

Another day; additional information about how Russia interfered with the 2016 election.

In yesterday's We Resist thread, I linked to a piece at Talking Points Memo detailing how Russia had targeted the Wisconsin Elections Commission via an online ad.

In comments, I also linked to a Wall Street Journal piece detailing how Russian hackers stole highly classified material via antivirus software made by Russia-based Kaspersky Lab.

Today, there is another piece at the Wall Street Journal, reporting that Facebook "cut references to Russia from a public report in April about manipulation of its platform around the presidential election because of concerns among the company's lawyers and members of its policy team, according to people familiar with the matter."

The drafting of the report sparked internal debate over how much information to disclose about Russian mischief on Facebook and its efforts to affect U.S. public opinion during the 2016 presidential contest, according to these people. Some at Facebook pushed to not include a mention of Russia in the report because the company's understanding of Russian activity was too speculative, according to one of the people.

Ultimately, the 13-page report, published on April 27 and titled "Information Operations and Facebook," was shortened by several pages by Facebook's legal and policy teams from an earlier draft, and didn't mention Russia at all, the people said.

Rather, it concluded that "malicious actors" engaged in influence campaigns during the U.S. presidential election but said it couldn't determine who was responsible. The extent of Facebook's understanding at the time of Russian influence is unclear.
So, add Facebook to the list of people who knew that Russia was fucking with the U.S. presidential election but decided to cover it up rather than raise every goddamn alarm about it.

And why not? Facebook made bank from Russia during the election: "Facebook is finally making clear just how pervasive Russia-bought political ads were on its platform in the days and weeks before and after the election. Around 10 million Facebook users saw Russia-bought political ads, according to new information released on Monday night by the company. The disclosure, which the company previously shared with Congress, marks the first time the social network has shared how many of its users saw the $100,000 worth of political ads linked to Russian actors."

[Content Note: Video may autoplay at link] Further, as reported by CNN Money today, Russian disruptors also used Facebook to hawk merch in an attempt to divide the U.S. electorate:
"Young, gifted and black." "Melanin and muscles." "Our sons matter." The slogans on the clothing that a group called "Blacktivist" offered for sale through Facebook were supposed to look like they came from American Black Lives Matter activists. But they were in fact being promoted by a Russian-linked group working to amplify political discord in the U.S. before the presidential election.

CNN first reported last week that "Blacktivist" accounts on Facebook and Twitter had regularly shared content intended to stoke outrage in an apparent attempt to amplify racial tensions during the U.S. presidential election. The accounts have been suspended and are among those handed over to Congress as part of its investigation into Russia's meddling in the 2016 presidential election.

The page appears to have sold fewer than 100 items of Blacktivist-branded merchandise, but the actual amount of clothing sold is less significant than what the effort represented: A move by the people behind Blacktivist to go beyond social media and spread their influence into the physical world. The Blacktivist Facebook page also promoted at least seven rallies and demonstrations around the U.S. in 2016.

Jonathon Morgan, the founder of New Knowledge, a company that tracks the spread of misinformation online, says the promotion of events and the sale of merchandise is straight out of the Russian misinformation handbook, and that it "fits a pattern of Russian propagandists' attempts at appearing as authentic Americans participating in politics."
It has long been clear, even long before Election Day, that Russia was trying to influence the result of the 2016 presidential election. With each passing day, we get more detail on the various methods they used to do precisely that.

The truth is, there is simply no way this election result ever should have been certified. And I will say again what I've said since it was (wrongly) certified: It needs to be vacated.

I don't believe vacating the election result is remotely likely. Doesn't make it any less true that it's what should happen, though.

Open Wide...

Trump Suggests a Foreign Policy "Storm" Is Coming

Last night, following a meeting at the White House with military leaders, Donald Trump gave a brief, typically aggressive, prepared statement to pool reporters. Then, as Josh Marshall reports: "The White House then announced that press appearances were done for the day. Then roughly an hour later, a pool reporter was again called in for another by the President and the military leaders. As the pool reporter put it, 'White House staff hastily assembled the pool to cover a photo spray with military leaders and their spouses before a dinner with POTUS and FLOTUS.'"

It was during that photo session that Trump then said something incredibly troubling:

TRUMP: You guys know what this represents?

REPORTER 1 [man; off-camera]: Tell us, sir.

TRUMP: Maybe it's the calm before the storm.

REPORTER 2 [man; off-camera]: What's the storm?

TRUMP: Could be — the calm before the storm.

REPORTER 3: [woman; off-camera] On Iran? On ISIS? On what?

REPORTER 4: [woman; off-camera] What storm, Mr. President?

TRUMP: We have the world's great military people in this room, I will tell you that. And we're going to have a great evening. Thank you all for coming. Thank you.

REPORTER 4: What storm, Mr. President?

TRUMP: You'll find out.

REPORTER 5: [man; off-camera] Give us a hint on your Iran decision.

TRUMP: Thank you, everybody.

[reporters shout questions as they are ushered out of the room; Trump gives the thumbs-up]
Everything about that is horrendous, even down to the precise choice of words: A "storm" is a profoundly insensitive metaphor given the devastation caused by storms in the southern U.S., Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

But irrespective of the precise words he used, Trump's entire premise is profoundly disturbing. He is promising a "storm," at a meeting of military leaders, with zero specifics.

The role of the president is to be reassuring and diplomatic; it is not to be vaguely ominous in a way that suggests the "storm" is brewing because he's about to make it rain.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of a pink couch

Hosted by a pink sofa. Have a seat and chat.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Suggested by Shaker Drazil: "Who would play you in the movie of your life?"

We've done this question before, and I always love it! And my answer remains the obvious choice: Melissa McCarthy.

Open Wide...

Harvey Weinstein Revealed as Sexual Predator

[Content Note: Rape culture; description of sexual assault.]

Harvey Weinstein, the powerhouse film producer, is a sexual predator. This has been one of those "open secrets" for many, many years. There have been countless blind items on gossip sites about it; it was widely presumed that Rose McGowan's rape allegation was about Weinstein; and Ambra Battilana accused Weinstein of sexual assault, though no charges were brought "in part because of her credibility issues." Of course.

Anyone who knows a woman pursuing acting is probably two degrees (or less) away from having heard stories about Weinstein's plethoric abuse, coercion, manipulation, and attempted exploitation of aspiring actresses.

And yet. It was only today, in the year of our lord Jesus Jones two thousand and seventeen, that the New York Times finally published a piece about his decades of abuse (complete with a photo of Weinstein with Hillary Clinton, captioned: "Harvey Weinstein and Hillary Clinton in 2012. Mr. Weinstein held a fund-raiser for Mrs. Clinton at his Manhattan home last year.").

The headline on the piece by Jodi Kantor and Megan Twohey is: "Decades of Sexual Harassment Accusations Against Harvey Weinstein." (Reminder: Most reporters don't write their own headlines.) But one of the very first incidents recounted in the piece is a sexual assault: "The following year, once again at the Peninsula, a female assistant said Mr. Weinstein badgered her into giving him a massage while he was naked, leaving her 'crying and very distraught,' wrote a colleague, Lauren O'Connor, in a searing memo asserting sexual harassment and other misconduct by their boss."


There is a lot of documentation of Weinstein's "decades" of abuse in the article — and the question with which any decent person should be left is: How was this allowed to go on for so long?

Because it wasn't just his victims who knew: "During that time, after being confronted with allegations including sexual harassment and unwanted physical contact, Mr. Weinstein has reached at least eight settlements with women, according to two company officials speaking on the condition of anonymity."

Eight settlements.

Including Rose McGowan and Ambra Battilana.

And that, of course, leads us to the answer to the question any decent person should be asking: The reason it was allowed to go on for so long is because powerful men retaining their power is more important than women's safety or peace or self-worth or very lives, and it's unfathomably easy to protect those men because the purveyors of the rape culture have cultivated and nurture an impenetrable culture of disbelief, used to silence and discredit and revictimize survivors.

Thus, my headline is not: Harvey Weinstein is a sexual predator. This I already knew, because I listen to women and I believe them.

All the New York Times did was reveal what was a known truth to me, and lots of other people.

I take up space in solidarity with the women who survived being victimized by Harvey Weinstein, and in utter contempt of the people who abetted his decades of predation and harm.

As for Weinstein himself, he's blaming "the culture" of the '60s and '70s, as though no man or woman had any way of knowing that sexual abuse was wrong then, and he's taking a leave of absence with a team of people tasked with helping him learn that women are human beings or whatever.

Which is all a familiar refrain. He didn't know. He just needs the help of a supportive community. He's so sorry; it was just a mistake.

The fuck it was.

If there is one thing I desperately hope people understand from my 13 years of writing about the rape culture, it is this: Sexual abuse does not happen by accident. It is not a misunderstanding. Hostility to consent is not a bug; it's a feature. It's the entire point.

The only people who benefit from extending good will and the benefit of the doubt to a sexual predator are sexual predators. It will never, ever, prevent a single incident of sexual harassment, assault, and/or violence. It will, however, enable many.

Harvey Weinstein knows all of this. And if anyone should be inclined to believe his sad-sack story, let me remind you that he is in the professional storytelling business, and he is one of the best.

Open Wide...