Hillary Clinton Wonders If She Should Have Told Trump: "Back Up, You Creep."

This morning, MSNBC's Morning Joe debuted two excerpts from Hillary Clinton's upcoming memoir, What Happened. The two audio clips — one explaining what the book covers, and one recalling Donald Trump's creepy behavior during the second debate — featured Clinton reading the excerpts in her own voice.

Morning Joe Co-Anchor Willie Geist: Welcome back to Morning Joe. We have obtained an exclusive excerpt from Hillary Clinton's new book, and, for the first time, we're hearing exactly what she thought about sharing a stage with Donald Trump. First, here's what the Democratic nominee had to say about why she's revisiting last year's losing bid for the White House.

Hillary Clinton: [in voiceover, reading an excerpt from her book] I don't have all the answers, and this isn't a comprehensive account of the twenty-sixteen race. That's not for me to write. I have too little distance and too great a stake in it. Instead, this is my story. I want to pull back the curtain on an experience that was exhilarating, joyful, humbling, infuriating, and just plain baffling.

Writing this wasn't easy. Every day that I was a candidate for president, I knew that millions of people were counting on me — and I couldn't bear the idea of letting them down. But I did. I couldn't get the job done. And I'll have to live with that for the rest of my life.

In this book, I write about moments from the campaign that I wish I could go back and do over. [chuckles] If the Russians could hack my subconscious, they'd find a long list.

I also capture some moments I want to remember forever — like when my tiny granddaughter raced into the room while I was practicing my convention speech, and what it was like, hours later, to step onstage, to deliver that speech, as the first woman ever nominated by a major political party for President of the United States.

Geist: [in voiceover, over footage from the second presidential debate] In the excerpt we have, Secretary Clinton also addressed this moment from October — you'll remember this — when Donald Trump stood directly behind her while the two candidates debated at Washington University in St. Louis.

Clinton: [in voiceover, reading an excerpt from her book] This is not okay, I thought. It was the second presidential debate, and Donald Trump was looming behind me. Two days before, the world heard him brag about groping woman. Now we were on a small stage, and no matter where I walked, he followed me closely — staring at me; making faces.

It was incredibly uncomfortable. He was literally breathing down my neck. My skin crawled. It was one of those moments where you wish you could hit pause and ask everyone watching, "Well, what would you do?" Do you stay calm, keep smiling, and carry on as if he weren't repeatedly invading your space? Or do you turn, look him in the eye, and say loudly and clearly, "Back up, you creep. Get away from me. I know you love to intimidate women, but you can't intimidate me, so back up."

I chose Option A: I kept my cool, aided by a lifetime of dealing with difficult men trying to throw me off. I did, however, grip the microphone extra hard. I wonder, though, whether I should have chosen Option B. [chuckles] It certainly would have been better TV!

Maybe I have overlearned the lesson of staying calm, biting my tongue, digging my fingernails into a clenched fist — smiling all the while, determined to present a composed face to the world.
It kills me — it will always kill me — to hear Hillary Clinton talking about disappointing her supporters, letting us down. I'm sure, I know, there are indeed people who voted for her who are disappointed, let down, angry, blameful. I am not one of them.

What I wanted and expected of Hillary Clinton was that she would do her very best to win. I never expected her to be perfect; I never expected that she would never make a mistake. I wanted and expected that she would run with integrity; with tenacity; with a commitment to workable, detailed, progressive policy; and with her love for people and for her country front and center.

That is what she promised, and that is what she did. She owes me no apology.

She also does not owe me the second-guessing of the split-second decisions she had to make in difficult moments. Would I have loved with the power of ten thousand suns if Hillary Clinton had turned to Donald Trump during that second debate and told him to back the fuck off? Hell yeah I would have!

Did I also love that Hillary Clinton was indubitably unflappable even as a toxic, predatory bully stalked her around the stage trying (and failing) to intimidate her? Hell yeah I did!

Of those two options, there frankly wasn't a bad one. They were just different.

And that's the reason, right there, that Hillary Clinton never let me down. She only saw two potential options, both of them valuable (and limited) in their own ways. The bad options never occurred to her.

Hillary Clinton campaigned for 18 months, day after exhausting day, keeping up a ruthless schedule that would drive most people half her age to collapse after three weeks, no less a year and a half. She gave up time with her family, her grandchildren; gave up anything resembling free time; gave up her privacy. She made countless sacrifices on behalf of this country, which has often been very unkind to her in return for her lifetime of service. She did her best, and it was pretty fucking good.

Hillary Clinton still doesn't owe me a goddamned thing. She gave it her all. And that is enough.

[Related Reading: Let's Just Think About This for a Minute.]

Open Wide...

Trump Doubles Down in Phoenix

Last night, Donald Trump held another Make America Clap for Me Again rally in Phoenix, during which he doubled down on white supremacy and nativism in a discursive rant which became increasingly maniacal as he went off-script in a protracted airing of grievances.

Under the blunt headline "Trump Goes Off-Script in Hour-Long Public Meltdown," Vanity Fair's Maya Kosoff decscribes the spectacle:

After walking onstage at the Phoenix Convention Center to "God Bless The U.S.A." for what was, effectively, a 2020 campaign rally, Donald Trump repeatedly ditched his TelePrompTer and went off-script as he ranted about being mistreated by the media in the wake of Charlottesville, relentlessly attacked an array of enemies including both of Arizona's Republican senators, and portrayed himself as the true victim of a violent clash between white supremacists and counter-protesters that left one woman dead.

Journalists and other social media commentators watched, stunned, as he proceeded to spend the rest of his hourlong speech unloading on the mainstream press, praising a CNN pundit who was fired for tweeting a Nazi slogan, and re-litigating his entire response to Charlottesville, line by line, in what has become a hallmark of the Trump presidency: a full-on public meltdown.

With a captive, cheering audience of thousands before him, Trump reveled in the opportunity to vent, after a long summer of political crises, and to set the record straight. "What happened in Charlottesville strikes at the core of America," he said, blaming the "thugs" and the "dishonest media" for the violence in Virginia. This statement drew nearly a minute of boos from the rabid crowd.

...He proceeded to reread the statement he initially gave in response to the protest, conveniently leaving out the part where he blamed "both sides"—both white supremacists and the anti-racist counterprotesters—for the violence. He mocked the media: "It took a day! Why didn't he say it fast enough!" He berated the New York Times, the Washington Post, and CNN in one breath, and flatly defended himself against charges of racism. "And then they say, is he a racist? And then I did a second one," he said, referring to another statement he gave. "And then I said, racism is evil. Did they report that I said racism was evil? They all say what a bad guy I am. And then you wonder why CNN is doing relatively poorly in the ratings. They put seven people, all anti-Trump, and then they fired Jeffrey Lord!" he added, referring to the pundit who was fired after tweeting "Seig Heil" at a critic. "Poor Jeffrey."

"The words were perfect," Trump said of his own words about Charlottesville. "They only take out anything they think of, and all they do is complain. The media can attack me, but where I draw the line is when they attack you, the decency of our supporters. You are honest, hard-working, tax-paying—and you're over-taxed, but we're going to get your taxes down—Americans. It's time to expose the crooked media deceptions and to challenge the media for their role in fomenting divisions. They are trying to take away our history and our heritage."
Trump continued to demonize the free press, accusing them of being traitorous people who are actively working to undermine the nation.

And yes, by the way, they are trying to take away our history and our heritage. You see that. [crowd boos] And I say it, and you know, we're all pros; we're all, like, we have a certain sense. We're smart people. [gestures at members of press] These are truly dishonest people. And not all of 'em — not all of 'em. You have some very good reporters; you have some very fair journalists. But for the most part, honestly, these are really, really dishonest people. And they're bad people. And I really think they don't like our country. I really believe that.
Publicly berating journalists and political commentators as enemies of the state is a feature of authoritarian rule. Trump's incendiary rhetoric is designed explicitly to delegitimize the free press — and create a context in which all criticism of the authoritarian is axiomatically suspect. This is incredibly dangerous, and it must be taken very seriously.

As must Trump's equally vile rhetoric of white supremacy and nativism, which ran throughout his aggressive address. Although he did not publicly pardon Sheriff Joe Arpaio at the event last night, he all but promised he would do so in future, speaking warmly about one of the most divisive and racist public figures in the country.

Do the people in this room like Sheriff Joe? [crowd cheers wildly for an extended period of time, while Trump basks in their applause and turns in circles, smirking] So, was Sheriff Joe convicted for doing his job? [the crowd shouts affirmatively] He shoulda had a jury. But you know what? I'll make a prediction: I think he's gonna be just fine, okay? [crowd cheers] But! But! I won't do it tonight, because I don't want to cause any controversy. Is that okay? [crowd cheers] All right? But Sheriff Joe can feel good.
Trump further whipped up the crowd by threatening to shut down the entire federal government if necessary to get his promised border wall built.

Build that wall. Now the obstructionist Democrats would like us not to do it, but, believe me, if we have to close down our government, we're building that wall. [crowd cheers] Let me be very clear!
From there, it was more — and more — of the same.


This president is pouring gasoline onto a fire whose flames he has been fanning for more than two years. Everyone is warning him that he's going to cause an explosion, as if that isn't his very objective.

He doesn't need to be warned. He needs to be stopped.

If the Republican leadership isn't making a plan to remove this dangerous man from office, they are even more foolish and craven than I thought. (Which I didn't believe was actually possible.)

Of course we all know that they are breathtakingly unprincipled, perfectly content to tolerate (if not personally share) Trump's white supremacy, misogyny, and other sundry bigotries, as long as he would sign off on their heinously indecent legislative agenda. But he's such a bombastic nightmare that he's stymied their agenda (even more than their not having workable policies has) and now risks permanently redefining the Republican brand as the party of Nazi sympathizers.

(Which they already were, but Trump has amplified and made visible that which was long protected under the thin veneer of, I guess, just not being Nazi sympathizers.)

The Republican elites thought they could control him, but they were wrong. Classic Republican error — believing that human nature can be contained because they say so.

Trump's nature cannot be contained, especially not as long as he's got the unrivaled power of the office of the presidency behind him. He won't change, so his circumstances must change. Swiftly and decisively.

Surely even the Republican Party sees that now.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of a red couch

Hosted by a red sofa. Have a seat and chat.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Suggested by Shaker yazikus: "What is your road-trip CD list?"

One of the things I love to do when making a road-trip mix is pick artists that come from the place(s) to which I'm traveling and/or through which I'm traveling on the way to my destination.

So, for example, when Iain and I were still living in Indiana and made a road-trip to visit the Space Cowpokes in New Jersey, I picked a few artists from Ohio for our trip through Ohio, then a lot of artists from Pennsylvania for our trip across Pennsylvania (it's a big state!), and then we ended on artists from Jersey: Bon Jovi, Whitney Houston, The Misfits, The Fugees, Gloria Gaynor, Queen Latifah, Bruuuuuuuuuuuuuuuce.

Open Wide...

An Observation

So, some conservative asshole wrote a thing (to which I'm not linking, because fuck that guy) about how Donald Trump's 11-year-old son Barron Trump needs to start "dressing like he's in the White House" after the kid wore t-shirts and shorts on Air Force One over the weekend.

First of all: No.

Second of all: Nope.

Thirdly: What the fuck is wrong with you?

Fourth, fully 67% of the sentient beings in the multiverse have already weighed in on why picking on the way an 11-year-old kid dresses is just the most colossal jerk move ever, because HE IS A CHILD ON HIS SUMMER VACATION, and also WHO CARES SHUT UP YOU GARBAGE BULLY, so let me just add this point: Donald Trump wears a suit in the White House every goddamned day and they don't magically make him behave as though he is a decent and competent president.

What's even the point of demanding that anyone ever dress any way, really?

That's not how clothes work, and also stoppppppppp.

Open Wide...

Discussion Thread: How Are You?

I feel something coming in the air. Tonight, or soon. I don't know what it is. But I sense that pieces are being moved into place for a big shift. It's making me very anxious, especially because I can't get my head around what it is.

This administration has been a waking nightmare, but the one tiny comfort I had was always being able to predict what was coming.

I'm suddenly unsure, and it's overwhelming me with dread.

That said, as ever I feel strongly that building community in order to validate and support each other is incredibly important, no matter what tomorrow brings, and I am here for it.

Aside from politics, I'm all right. I made a tasty bit of salmon with some perfectly ripened avocado for lunch, and had a quick call with Iain during which we both completely slap-happy and making each other laugh. I was perfectly content for 21 minutes and 44 seconds, which feels like a lot these days. I'll take it with gratitude and without complaint.

How are you?

Open Wide...

On Joss Whedon, and the Betrayal of Trust by "Feminist" Men

[Content note: Gaslighting, lack of consent, infidelity.]

This weekend, architect Kai Cole penned a devastating account of the end of her marriage to Joss Whedon, the creative force behind Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Firefly, and the director of several recent Marvel films.

Cole revealed that for years, Whedon had affairs, both physical and emotional, with the women around him — friends, fans, actresses, and co-workers — affairs which he told her about only as he was ending their relationship. She writes:

Despite understanding, on some level, that what he was doing was wrong, he never conceded the hypocrisy of being out in the world preaching feminist ideals, while at the same time, taking away my right to make choices for my life and my body based on the truth. He deceived me for 15 years, so he could have everything he wanted. I believed, everyone believed, that he was one of the good guys, committed to fighting for women’s rights, committed to our marriage, and to the women he worked with. But I now see how he used his relationship with me as a shield, both during and after our marriage, so no one would question his relationships with other women or scrutinize his writing as anything other than feminist.
Plenty of people out there have offered their reactions to Cole's piece, from Gamer Gate types who hate Whedon for any semblance of feminism he does possess; to those who have long criticized his work’s lack of diversity and often frankly anti-feminist bent; to those who argue you can still cheat and be a feminist, so what’s this all about, really.

I’m not writing to engage those takes. I am writing simply to acknowledge that for a lot of us, this hurts. And it’s not about our opinion of Dollhouse.

It’s about yet another man abusing a position of trust.

And in this case: A man abusing his knowledge of feminism, its language and analysis, in a way deeply hurtful to his partner and their relationship, and then gaslighting her about the reality of the situation.

According to Cole, Whedon revealed the affairs in writing to her after filing for divorce. Per her account, he explained his first affair, on the set of Buffy, thusly:

“When I was running ‘Buffy,’ I was surrounded by beautiful, needy, aggressive young women. It felt like I had a disease, like something from a Greek myth. Suddenly I am a powerful producer and the world is laid out at my feet and I can’t touch it.” But he did touch it. He said he understood, “I would have to lie — or conceal some part of the truth — for the rest of my life,” but he did it anyway, hoping that first affair, “would be ENOUGH, that THEN we could move on and outlast it.”
This is an astonishing way for a man who understands feminism to describe his history. There is blaming of the women involved — if only they had not been so beautiful, so needy, so aggressive, perhaps this would have been different.

He also objectifies them, as “the world laid at my feet,” and further self-aggrandizes his desires as “a disease, something out of Greek myth.” That doesn’t sound much like a man who’s taken full responsibility for harming his relationship. The problem isn’t a curse laid by a sorceress, but Whedon’s own refusal to be honest.

Cole says she is recovering from the relationship, after being diagnosed with complex PTSD. I wish her all the best in her journey. And I write this in support of those who find her account all too familiar. Because this is gaslighting, this is harmful, and we've lived it.

Look at it this way: If Whedon were a Christian megapastor who had hidden behind his reputation as a man of faith in order to carry on affair, who had justified his emotional affairs by claiming he was practicing his faith (“ministering” to women, for example), and/or who had hidden behind his marriage in order to keep people from questioning his involvement with other women, we would have no trouble seeing the issue. And we would understand why those who had put trust in his messages — even if it was sometimes a critical trust — would be feeling devastated.

And we would certainly understand why women who have been in a similar situation would be feeling especially devastated.

And we would instinctively recoil if he blamed Satan or in other ways dodged responsibility by spouting the lingo that had so long shielded him. Or, in this case, by blaming patriarchy for his actions:

When he walked out of our marriage, and was trying to make “things seem less bewildering” to help me understand how he could have lied to me for so long, he said, “In many ways I was the HEIGHT of normal, in this culture. We’re taught to be providers and companions and at the same time, to conquer and acquire — specifically sexually — and I was pulling off both!”
Personally, I have few words for how this makes me feel. I know I am not the only one who has been hurt by someone who has mastered the concepts of feminism well enough to understand how gender roles help abet his infidelity, but couldn’t be arsed to meaningfully engage enough with those concepts to be honest with a partner.

On some level, then, this isn’t about his work, and demanding that every discussion be about his work is not helpful. There’s certainly a time and place to discuss his works, which were already problematic, which already demand discussion. But it feels a little hollow to see this descend into another round of how fucked up his vision of Black Widow is, or how “we” already knew he was a lousy feminist because of Firefly (or whatever.) That can’t be the only conversation.

It’s also not helpful to have every conversation be about how this isn’t a surprise, or that “we” already knew he was problematic, or a jackass, or whatever. Again, that’s a fine conversation, but it doesn’t have to be every one.

Some of us need a space to acknowledge something more fundamental: We’ve been here. And it hurts like fuck to see it being played out again, on the big screen.

This betrayal of trust, trust given in the name of feminism, is a story we have seen played out with Prominent Male Feminists before. And it hurts every time.

In part, it may hurt because we have personally extended Whedon good faith in regards to his works, choosing to believe that he is sincerely interested in feminism as a good thing, even if he practices it poorly. It may hurt because, for some people, his works may have been an introduction to feminism on some level, even if it's one we have outgrown. It's jarring to think that person was using feminism so cynically.

But it may be even more personal than that.

It hurts because some of us have been gaslighted just like this. By men who are not-so-prominent, but equally manipulative. By men who disguised emotional or physical infidelity as "just relating to women better." By men who used their relationships with us as a shield. By men who learned the lingo, only in order to abuse it.

If it’s feeling all too familiar, you have my sympathy, and I take up space in solidarity with those who are having a rough time with this. If you have been looking for a space to talk about those feelings, have at it in comments.

[Note: I have deliberately avoided commenting on the dynamics involved in Whedon’s relationships with women other than Cole, because I do not know enough about the perspectives of the other parties involved. It feels important to acknowledge, however, that the categories Cole describes include people over whom Whedon potentially exercised tremendous professional power, a dynamic that can easily be abused, and where trust can also be betrayed.]

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Dudley the Greyhound lying on the couch, grinning at me
"Hi!"

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 215

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Here are some things in the news today:

Earlier today by me: So the President Gave a Speech Last Night and Pence to Join Trump in Phoenix.

[Content Note: Disablism] Eugene Robinson at the Washington Post: It's Time to Talk About Trump's Mental Health. You know, even setting aside the disablism here and in the dozens of other pieces just like it, the problem is that their authors presume Trump is actually trying to govern like a traditional president and failing. But what if he isn't? And there's frankly an enormous amount of evidence that he isn't.

What looks like "mental illness" — or some other variation on "unfitness" — when judging Trump's comportment against traditional expectations of a president looks a lot less so when judging Trump's comportment against expectations of an aspiring dictator.

Maybe Trump praised Duterte, for example, not because he's "an idiot" who doesn't know any better, but because he actually admires Duterte.

I understand why people don't want to contemplate that possibility, but maybe "it's time" to talk about that.

* * *

[Content Note: War; death] Maya Gebeily at AFP/Yahoo News: Dozens Reported Dead in US-Led Strikes as Battle Nears Raqa Heart.
Dozens of civilians have died in two days of intense US-led strikes on Raqa, a monitor said Tuesday, as fighting to retake the Syrian city from jihadists nears its densely populated centre.

The coalition acknowledges it has pounded the city and surrounding area with more than 250 air strikes over the past week alone, in support of the Syrian Democratic Forces alliance battling the Islamic State group.

The SDF has so far captured just under 60 percent of Raqa, monitors say, leaving IS with about 10 square kilometres (four square miles) in the heart of the city.

But as clashes approach central Raqa, monitors and activists have reported scores killed in intensifying coalition bombardment of the city.

On Monday, US-led air strikes killed at least 42 civilians in several neighbourhoods in Raqa under IS control, according to the Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights.

Nineteen children and 12 women were among the dead, the monitor said.

The Observatory says 167 civilians have been killed in coalition strikes since August 14, including 27 on Sunday.

"The tolls are high because the air strikes are hitting neighbourhoods in the city centre that are densely packed with civilians," Observatory director Rami Abdel Rahman said.
Goddammit. I don't even have words. My heart aches.

Tim Johnson at McClatchy: US Navy Collisions Stoke Cyber Threat Concerns. "The Pentagon won't yet say how the USS John S. McCain was rammed by an oil tanker near Singapore, but red flags are flying as the Navy's decades-old reliance on electronic guidance systems increasing looks like another target of cyberattack. The incident — the fourth involving a Seventh Fleet warship this year — occurred near the Strait of Malacca, a crowded 1.7-mile-wide waterway that connects the Indian Ocean and the South China Sea and accounts for roughly 25 percent of global shipping. ...In a little noticed June 22 incident, someone manipulated GPS signals in the eastern part of the Black Sea, leaving some 20 ships with little situational awareness. Shipboard navigation equipment, which appeared to be working properly, reported the location of the vessels 20 miles inland, near an airport. That was the first known instance of GPS 'spoofing,' or misdirection."


Of course it has.

Alec MacGillis at New York Magazine in collaboration with ProPublica: Is Anybody Home at HUD? "The story of the Trump administration has been dominated by the Russia investigations, the Obamacare-repeal morass, and cataclysmic internecine warfare. But there is a whole other side to Trump's takeover of Washington: What happens to the government itself, and all it is tasked with doing, when it is placed under the command of the Chaos President? HUD has emerged as the perfect distillation of the right's antipathy to governing. If the great radical-conservative dream was, in Grover Norquist's famous words, to 'drown government in a bathtub,' then this was what the final gasps of one department might look like."

[CN: Video may autoplay at link] Brian Ross, Matthew Mosk, and Rhonda Schwartz at ABC News: Glenn Simpson, Key Figure Behind Million-Dollar 'Dossier,' to Face Questions. "A key figure behind the so-called 'dossier' featuring uncorroborated and salacious allegations about then-candidate Donald Trump's ties to Russia will be questioned by investigators from the Senate Judiciary Committee today about the funding and sources for the document. ...Simpson, who will appear in a closed session on Capitol Hill on Tuesday, hired the former MI6 agent Christopher Steele to compile the now infamous 'dossier,' which alleged that members of the Trump campaign had colluded with Russian agents to damage Hillary Clinton, Trump's Democratic opponent."

My friend Leah McElrath notes that ABC kinda buried the lede on this one:


"According to people briefed on the developments, Steele has met with the FBI and provided agents with the names of his sources for the allegations in the dossier, but it is unclear, how much information lawmakers will be able to obtain from Simpson this week. Attorneys for Fusion GPS have indicated to the committee that its client relationships are confidential." That is the very last paragraph in ABC's piece.

[CN: Misogyny]


Jesus fucking Jones.

Glenn Kessler, Michelle Ye Hee Lee, and Meg Kelly at the Washington Post: Trump's List of False and Misleading Claims Tops 1,000. "We have been tracking [Donald] Trump's false or misleading claims for more than seven months. Somewhere around Aug. 4 or Aug. 5, he broke 1,000 claims, and the tally now stands at 1,057. (Our full interactive graphic can be found here.) That's an impressive number by any standard. In fact, we are a little late with this update because we have simply been overwhelmed keeping track of the deluge of claims made by the president in the later part of July. Things slowed down during the president's 'working vacation,' so we have finally been able to catch up. At the president's current pace, he averages nearly five claims a day."

That actually seems low to me, given that some of his tweets have five bullshit claims in them.

* * *

Oh. My. God.


Damian Paletta at the Washington Post: Treasury Secretary's Wife Boasts of Travel on Government Plane; Touts Hermes and Valentino Fashion.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin's wife, Louise Linton, boasted of flying on a government plane with her husband to Kentucky on Monday and then named the numerous fashion brands she wore on the trip in an unusual social media post that only became more bizarre minutes later.

When someone posted a comment on Linton's Instagram picture that criticized the way Linton touted the trip, the treasury secretary's wife swung back hard, mentioning the extreme wealth she and her husband control.

"Did you think this was a personal trip?!" Linton wrote on her Instagram page, responding to the person who had written "glad we could pay for your little getaway."

(Linton's Instagram account was later made "private" so that it could not be publicly seen).

Linton continued in her response to the critic: "Adorable! Do you think the US govt paid for our honeymoon or personal travel?! Lololol. Have you given more to the economy than me and my husband? Either as an individual earner in taxes OR in self sacrifice to your country? I'm pretty sure we paid more taxes toward our day 'trip' than you did. Pretty sure the amount we sacrifice per year is a lot more than you'd be willing to sacrifice if the choice was yours."

Linton added, "You're adorably out of touch … Thanks for the passive aggressive nasty comment. Your kids look very cute. Your life looks cute."
At ThinkProgress, Aaron Rupar notes: "Linton's condescending remarks come as Mnuchin, a 17-year veteran of Goldman Sachs who later ran a bank that has been described as a 'foreclosure machine,' ramps up his sales pitch for a tax reform plan that the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center says will disproportionately benefit the top one percent of earners."

It also "came on the same day as news about how [Donald] Trump's lifestyle is creating huge financial and logistical problems for the Secret Service and for taxpayers."

What a fucking administration this is.

* * *

[CN: Violence; murder; racism; death penalty] Mark Berman and Wesley Lowery at the Washington Post: Missouri Plans to Execute Marcellus Williams as His Attorneys Say DNA Evidence Exonerates Him. "Missouri on Tuesday plans to execute Marcellus Williams, a death-row inmate convicted in 2001 of killing a former newspaper reporter. But with Williams's lethal injection looming, his attorneys have appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court for a stay, arguing that Missouri may be on the verge of executing the wrong person. ...Attorneys for Williams argue that he is innocent, pointing to DNA tests they say produced 'conclusive scientific evidence that another man committed this crime.' They say this evidence shows that DNA belonging to someone else was found on the murder weapon, exonerating Williams. ...State officials, though, said they still believe Williams is guilty due to other 'compelling non-DNA evidence.'" JFC. End the death penalty now.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

Pence to Join Trump in Phoenix

Tonight, Donald Trump will appear in Phoenix, Arizona, for yet another Make America Clap for Me Again rally — despite the fact that Phoenix Mayor Greg Stanton has asked Trump to postpone.

Trump was rumored to be considering the announcement of a pardon of Sheriff Joe Arpaio at the event — a doubling down on support for white supremacy and nativism, which Stanton (and everyone else with any sense and decency) is worried could result in violent clashes between Trump's white supremacist supporters and protesters at the event.

In a very curious move, Mike Pence will reportedly be joining Trump for the rally in Phoenix.


I'm not exactly sure what's going on, but here's what I've seen over the past week or so: Multiple news reports about Pence laying the groundwork for 2020 run, followed immediately by: Pence pulled back home early from abroad, followed immediately by: Pence getting super promotional on Twitter, which is a highly unusual tone for him, followed immediately by: Pence appearing at Phoenix rally with Trump, in contravention of long-established security protocols.

It seems incredibly unlikely to me that Pence came home from a trip abroad and is creating a massive national security risk just to show solidarity for Trump's Afghanistan war plan, which was vague garbage — hardly a radical military realignment that necessitates such elaborate maneuvers from Pence.

Something is up. And it's moving fast.

I have some ideas about what that might be, but they are nothing more than hunches. I'll be watching what happens in Phoenix closely to see if any of those hunches prove out and/or look more likely after tonight.

Open Wide...

My Favorite Eclipse Stuff

There was a lot of great, clever, beautiful, and/or hilarious stuff created during and about the solar eclipse yesterday. In no particular order, my Top Five Favorite Eclipse Things:

1. This extraordinary time-lapse photo of the eclipse created by photographer Jasman Mander.


2. This solar eclipse recreation with pug puppies.

Video Description: A fawn pug puppy is held in the air by a person off-screen. From the right side of the screen, a black pug puppy is moved through the air by another person, in front of the fawn pug puppy.
3. This tweet from former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright.


4. Rae's perfect comment on Trump looking straight at the eclipse.


5. This OMG LOLOLOLOLOLOL supercut of Fox News' Shep Smith giving zero fucks about the eclipse, compiled by the Washington Free Beacon, via Jessie.

Video Description: Video clips of Shep Smith sarcastically covering the solar eclipse, which really doesn't impress him. Sometimes he is onscreen making exasperated and sardonic faces while speaking; other times, it is only his voice over eclipse-related images, whether of the eclipse itself or people watching the eclipse, etc. [ETA Content Note: Racist dogwhistle.]

This is Total Eclipse of the Sun Watch Twenty-Seventeen on Fox News Channel. The excitement must be building and building, like fireworks! [edit] If I put this here, and my phone here, I have a total eclipse of the phone! [edit] Fascinating! It's amazing! Oh my god the moon has gotten in front of the—! Well, okay. I don't know. It's interesting-looking. The sun looks a little like the moon up there on my wall. [edit]

If you mention it, you gotta sing it. [sings] Where the deer and the antelope playyyyyyy....! [edit] WOW! Would you look at that?! IT'S A TOTAL ECLIPSE OF THE SUN! [edit] They know this is all it's gonna be, right? Just a moon over a sun? [edit] Oh, the sun's coming back now. Oh my goodness. That didn't last long. [edit]

Yoo hoo! I wanna hear more! [edit] No, 'cause now you can look at the thing! It's covered so YOU CAN LOOK AT IT! OH MY GOD! [edit] The sun is returning! Jalapeña! [edit] How was it? Response: "Weird." "Dark." "Cold." Another "dark." "Amazing." "I love nature." "Amazing." "I'm gonna die now." And we hope that doesn't happen! [edit]

Wanna see a total eclipse of this monitor? [holds paper in front of camera] It's totally eclipsed. [edit] Well, we're having a good time, too. And there's some people who think we should take this a little more seriously, on the Twitter. [edit] Because, for us, this is just a lotta fun. We've been watching the path of totality— [runs toward large board showing path of totality; a producer gets caught on camera] You can catch D.C. on screen if you run. [edit]

Do you know that it goes [convulses] buzz buzz buzz like old NASA stuff from the seventies whenever you move around? It's 'cause of the sun! [edit] And then over on MSNBC, it's just—it's just sorta dark and vacant. [edit] They're not gonna have a—what is it?! [the crew murmurs unenthusiastically: "Total eclipse of the sun."] Not a total eclipse of the sun down in— [cracks himself up; edit]

The sun is 400 times larger than the moon. But the sun is 400 times farther away from us than the moon. Which works together nicely. [edit] So, here, it's a little darker than usual, but, uh, it's not, like, dark. [edit] According to one legend from ancient China [does Trump impression] CHI-NA! people were scared that a dragon might eat the sun. Which is always something to consider. [edit]

How was it?! Was it everything?!
Please feel welcome and encouraged to share your favorite eclipse stuff in comments! And don't be shy about self-promoting: If you created something cool, got a neat photo, said something hilarious...toot your own horn!

Open Wide...

So the President Gave a Speech Last Night...

Donald Trump gave a primetime address last night, during which he was supposed to outline his new plan for the Afghanistan conflict. If you missed it, video and a link to the full transcript are below. Trump's speech starts just after minute 33 in the video.


[Transcript.]

The long and the short of it is that Trump said we're going to commit more troops, that we're going to "attack," and that we're going to kill terrorists, but he won't say how many troops, where, or when.


He peppered his planless plan with a lot of belligerence toward Pakistan, as it was reported he would do. He failed to mention that he eliminated a key diplomatic position in the region.


He stuck to the teleprompter, on which there was a speech written by people who seem to have very little solid understanding of foreign policy delivered by a man who seems to have even less understanding of foreign policy.


Afterwards, there were still members of the press who insisted on playing the Presidential Pivot game.


And that's about it. Trump flip-flopped on Afghanistan, and justified his reversal by saying, "We are not nation-building again; we're killing terrorists."

Because he's not the kind of guy who would change his mind for some silly bullshit like helping people. Only for killing people.

Sob.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

Hosted by a turquoise sofa. Have a seat and chat.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Suggested by Shaker ivyceltress: "One or two spaces after a period to end a sentence?"

I don't have a preference, but two is just such an old habit for me, that I often type two even though one suffices.

Open Wide...

The Monday Blogaround

This blogaround brought to you by pearls.

Recommended Reading:

Sameer Rao: This Supa Dupa Fly Petition Wants to Replace a Virginia Confederate Statue with Missy Elliott's Likeness

Jenn Fang: [Content Note: White supremacy; exceptionalism; exploitation] Elaine Chao, and Those Who Would Use Asian Americans as Shields Against Racism

Rhett Jones: Man Behind Crowdfunded Submarine Admits That Missing Journalist Died and He Buried Her at Sea

Andy Towle: [video content] Customers Defend Woman from Transphobic Sales Clerk on 'What Would You Do?'

Loren Grush: Super Fast-Falling Snowstorms May Rage on Mars at Night

Andrew David Thaler: Protecting the Ocean Means Lots of Rigorous, Mundane Science

Leave your links and recommendations in comments. Self-promotion welcome and encouraged!

Open Wide...

Here Is Something Nice


Video Description: A very short, white, fuzzy-coated pony stands in a yard scattered with hay. A squat, orange tabby cat saunters up to the pony. The pony sniffs at the cat. The cat rubs its face against the pony's nose. They are friends. It is adorable.

[Via Dick King-Smith HQ.]

Open Wide...

Meet Fran Marion

Fran Marion is one of the leading voices for "Stand Up Kansas City, part of the Fight for $15 movement that aims raise the minimum wage across the U.S." She is a Black woman, 37 years old, a mother of two, a fast food worker for 22 years, and homeless.

She currently works at a short-staffed Popeyes, where, during one recent shift, she processed nearly 200 orders, "roughly one every two minutes. Those orders grossed about $950 for the company. Marion went home with $76."

While she stays with friends and her children stay with other friends, two bus rides away, she works and works — and she advocates with Stand Up Kansas City for higher wages for fast food workers.

And she bristles at the suggestion she just get a different job.

Marion says the argument that fast food workers should leave for other, better paid, jobs misses the point. People like fast food. The companies that make it make fortunes. "We are the foot soldiers for these billion-dollar companies. We are the ones doing the work and bringing the money," she says.

"At the top of America, when it comes to Trump and them, their goal is to keep us down," she says. "Between these billion-dollar companies and Trump, it's a power trip."

They can afford to pay more and, she believes, eventually they will. "We are still coming. No war has been won over night and we are not giving up."

More than that, she likes working in fast food. "I love it. I'm good at it. Just like Martin Luther King said, 'If you are going to be a road sweeper, be the best damn sweeper there is'," she says. "I don't know. It's just this society is all messed up."
I am very glad that Marion made this point. Her work has dignity. She provides a service people enjoy. She's good at it.

She shouldn't have to find another job. She should be paid a liveable wage for the job she already has.

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Olivia the White Farm Cat chewing on her front paw
NOM NOM NOM. Her paw tastes great after she dipped it in my coffee.

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 214

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Here are some things in the news today:

Earlier today by me: Trump's Lifestyle Bleeding Secret Service Budget Dry and Sailors Missing After Collision Near Strait of Malacca.

Last Friday, I noted that Steve Bannon's departure was not indicative of a fundamental break between Trump and Bannon, but was in fact a decision made so to untie Bannon's hands and allow him to launch a serious propaganda campaign outside the White House with the illusion of independence.

I made this assertion even as the cable news "experts" and other pundits were busily buying into the bullshit narrative that Trump had "fired" Bannon and a "pivot" was imminent.

And yet again, they were wrong and I was right.


The Mercers are not going to dilute their investments by funding both Trump and Bannon if the two of them are at odds.

If you aren't already familiar with Robert Mercer and his daughter Rebekah Mercer, now would be a good time to start. Rebekah was the one who convinced Bannon to stay on at the White House after H.R. McMaster had him pushed off the National Security Council: "Bekah tried to convince him that this is a long-term play." Which continues.

As my friend Sarah Kendzior noted in her latest piece for the Globe and Mail:
Mr. Bannon's departure is not a condemnation of Trump — it is a strategic move that allows Mr. Bannon to foment his ideologies from a more unencumbered perch at Breitbart, to which he has returned. Mr. Bannon was not fired by Trump, but freed, and has vowed to go to war with the more moderate — and this is a very relative term — members of the Trump administration as well as with any opponent of the President's agenda.

In other words, the pieces may have moved, but the game has not changed: Mr. Bannon and Mr. Trump will continue their shared agenda of promoting their racist agenda and what Mr. Bannon has euphemistically called "the deconstruction of the administrative state." (Mr. Trump more bluntly recommended in 2014 that the United States "go to total hell" in order to become great.) The turmoil would be a disaster for a president whose goal was ensuring a free and stable country, but that has never appeared to be Mr. Trump's prerogative. Instead, much as he did throughout his business career, he concentrates on maximizing his own financial gain while revelling in chaos and carnage.
The long-term play.

* * *

[Content Note: Video may autoplay at link] CBS News: Trump's Afghanistan Strategy to Put New Pressure on Pakistan. "In a nationally televised primetime address Monday, [Donald] Trump will unveil a 'path forward' for the U.S. in Afghanistan. ...The president is expected to green light the deployment of around 4,000 additional U.S. troops to Afghanistan and put new pressure on nearby Pakistan to stop giving safe haven to terrorists. ...The president is considering several possibilities to pressure Pakistan into stepping up the fight against terrorism, including reducing aid, taking away its status as a non-NATO ally, and threatening to name Pakistan as a state sponsor of terrorism."

I'm no foreign policy expert, but I'm not sure that putting additional pressure on the region right now is the wisest course of action.

In addition to the various regional tensions that are getting some news coverage in the U.S., there are also increasing tensions along the India-China border, which has gotten precious little attention in the U.S. media.


A lot of states with nuclear weaponry involved in escalating tensions. Suffice to say it would be safer for everyone if the United States prioritized deescalation and diplomatic resolutions in Afghanistan, but that is never going to happen while Trump is president.

Or any Republican.

* * *

[CN: Disablist language] Mike Allen at Axios: Why Top White House Officials Won't Quit Trump. "We talked to a half dozen senior administration officials, who range from dismayed but certain to stay, to disgusted and likely soon to leave. They all work closely with Trump and his senior team so, of course, wouldn't talk on the record. Instead, they agreed to let us distill their thinking/rationale. 'You have no idea how much crazy stuff we kill': The most common response centers on the urgent importance of having smart, sane people around Trump to fight his worst impulses. If they weren't there, they say, we would have a trade war with China, massive deportations, and a government shutdown to force construction of a Southern wall." Yeah, somehow I don't think that these jackasses have as much influence over Trump as they'd have us believe. But it's easier to position themselves as martyrs and patriots than the soulless, power-hungry climbers that they really are.

Matea Gold and Anu Narayanswamy at the Washington Post: Republican Committees Have Paid Nearly $1.3 Million to Trump-Owned Entities This Year.
The Republican National Committee paid the Trump International Hotel in Washington $122,000 last month after the party held a lavish fundraiser at the venue in June, the latest example of how GOP political committees are generating a steady income stream for [Donald] Trump's private business, new Federal Election Commission records show.

At least 25 congressional campaigns, state parties and the Republican Governors Association have together spent more than $473,000 at Trump hotels or golf resorts this year, according to a Washington Post analysis of campaign finance filings. Trump's companies collected an additional $793,000 from the RNC and the president's campaign committee, some of which included payments for rent and legal consulting.

The nearly $1.3 million spent by Republican political committees at Trump entities in 2017 has helped boost his company at a time when business is falling off at some core properties.
As I have been noting for at least a year or so, In 2000, Trump told Fortune magazine: "It's very possible that I could be the first presidential candidate to run and make money on it." He always tells us who he is. Trump was always going to exploit the presidency to grift as much money as possible for himself and his family.

[CN: Video may autoplay at link] Lydia O'Connor at the Huffington Post: Trump Administration Dissolves Federal Climate Advisory Committee. "Trump's administration has dissolved a federal panel of scientists and other experts tasked with helping create and implement new policy based on the latest climate change research findings. That decision, members of the 15-person committee told HuffPost on Sunday, does not bode well for the future of climate change preparation and prevention during Trump's time in office. A spokeswoman for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which established the panel in 2015, confirmed Sunday that the Department of Commerce would not renew the charter for the Sustained National Climate Assessment's Federal Advisory Committee." Jesus fucking Jones.

[CN: White supremacist violence; death] Addy Baird at ThinkProgress: Paul Ryan Statement on Charlottesville Completely Misrepresents Grieving Mom.
House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) said in a statement Monday that he was "struck by the tone Heather Heyer's parents took at her memorial service," saying their call for "healing and forgiveness" was a powerful example.

"Here they are suddenly grieving and saying goodbye to their daughter, taken by an act of domestic terrorism," Ryan said in a statement posted on Facebook Monday, more than a week after Heyer's death and five days after her memorial service. "And instead of turning to anger, they call for healing and forgiveness. They set a powerful example."

...[Ryan's] statement completely misrepresents what Heyer's mother, Susan Bro, said last week at Heyer's memorial service.

In her eulogy for her daughter, Bro said explicitly that it was "not all about forgiveness."

"We're not going to sit around and shake hands and go 'Kumbaya,' and I'm sorry, it's not all about forgiveness," Bro said. "I know that's not a popular trend. But the truth is, we are going to have our differences. We are going to be angry with each other. But let's channel that anger not into hate, not into violence, not into fear, but let's channel that difference, that anger into righteous action."
Fuck Paul Ryan and his entire disgusting white supremacist death cult masquerading as a political party.

[CN: White supremacy; anti-Black racism and anti-Semitism; eliminationist violence; threats] Samantha Schmidt at the Washington Post: KKK Leader Threatens to 'Burn' Latina Journalist, the First Black Person on His Property. "As [Ilia Calderón, a Colombian news anchor for Univision] pressed [Christopher Barker, a leader of a Ku Klux Klan chapter in North Carolina] on his views, he called her the n-word and told her to go back to her country. ...'Are you going to chase me out of here?' Calderón responded. 'No, we're going to burn you out,' he said. 'How are you gonna do it?' she retorted. At one point, she asked him how he would burn out the 11 million unauthorized immigrants in the country. 'Don't matter,' Barker said. 'We killed six million Jews the last time. Eleven million is nothing.'"

But in good resistance news...

Amy Littlefield at Rewire: 40,000 People in Boston Reject Racism, Shut Down 'Free Speech' Rally. "In a resounding rebuke of white supremacy and the racist violence in Charlottesville, Virginia, 40,000 people converged on the Boston Common Saturday, shutting down a so-called free speech rally that drew figures from the far right. 'That's the saddest demonstration I think I've ever witnessed,' one counter-protester remarked as they looked at the Parkman Bandstand, where a few dozen people stood surrounded by about 50 police officers and an expanse of empty grass. ...'Where's your rally?' the counter-demonstrators chanted from across a line of police barricades."


[The video embedded in the tweet shows the sparsely populated Nazi rally surrounded by throngs of anti-racist counter-demonstrators.]

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

Sailors Missing After Collision Near Strait of Malacca

Anna Fifield reports at the Washington Post:

Ten U.S. Navy sailors were missing and five were injured after the USS John S. McCain guided missile destroyer and an oil tanker more than three times its size collided near Singapore early Monday.

American and Singaporean ships and helicopters launched a search-and-rescue mission after the pre-dawn collision at the entrance to one of the world's busiest shipping lanes.

This was the second time in two months that a Navy destroyer based at the 7th Fleet's home port of Yokosuka, Japan, has been involved in a collision at sea. Seven sailors were killed when the USS Fitzgerald collided with a container ship south of Japan in June.

The McCain, an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer equipped with an Aegis system, had been on its way to a routine port visit in Singapore after patrolling in the South China Sea. Shipping data showed that the Liberian-flagged merchant vessel Alnic MC was also on its way to Singapore when the ships collided east of the Strait of Malacca at 5:24 a.m. local time, while it was still dark.
I desperately hope that the missing sailors will be found alive and unharmed. My thoughts are with their families; the waiting for news must be excruciating.

Last night, Voice of America's Steve Herman asked Donald Trump about the collision, to which Trump responded: "That's too bad."


Trump later tweeted: "Thoughts & prayers are w/ our @USNavy sailors aboard the #USSJohnSMcCain where search & rescue efforts are underway." Oh.

Reports are that Trump simply hadn't yet been briefed on the situation when he responded "That's too bad," but the president shouldn't have to be briefed in order to know that a more sensitive and decent response is required. And it's appalling that, even given time to consider a response, he simply offered a perfunctory "thoughts and prayers" only to the sailors aboard the destroyer. Fucking hell.

Open Wide...