Trump's Lifestyle Bleeding Secret Service Budget Dry

Donald Trump hates being president. He hates the work of being president; he hates the scrutiny and the criticism; he hates the White House, which he thinks is a dump; he hates the demands on his time, which he'd prefer to spend golfing.

And so he tries to do as little presidenting as possible, spending as much time away from the White House as he can. Which means a lot of travel. For him, and for his large family, who also spend as little time as possible in the White House, and as little time as possible with him.

All of this adds up to quickly draining the Secret Service's annual budget.

[Content Note: Video may autoplay at link] Kevin Johnson at USA Today: Secret Service Depletes Funds to Pay Agents Because of Trump's Frequent Travel, Large Family.

The Secret Service can no longer pay hundreds of agents it needs to carry out an expanded protective mission — in large part due to the sheer size of [Donald] Trump's family and efforts necessary to secure their multiple residences up and down the East Coast.

Secret Service Director Randolph "Tex" Alles, in an interview with USA TODAY, said more than 1,000 agents have already hit the federally mandated caps for salary and overtime allowances that were meant to last the entire year.

...Alles said the service is grappling with an unprecedented number of White House protectees. Under Trump, 42 people have protection, a number that includes 18 members of his family. That's up from 31 during the Obama administration.

Overwork and constant travel have also been driving a recent exodus from the Secret Service ranks, yet without congressional intervention to provide additional funding, Alles will not even be able to pay agents for the work they have already done.

The compensation crunch is so serious that the director has begun discussions with key lawmakers to raise the combined salary and overtime cap for agents, from $160,000 per year to $187,000 for at least the duration of Trump's first term.

But even if such a proposal was approved, about 130 veteran agents would not be fully compensated for hundreds of hours already amassed, according to the agency.
Emphases mine. Not only has Trump's lavish travel depleted the budget, but depleted it so critically that agents may not be paid for work they've done.

Which, frankly, continues a longtime pattern in which people who do work for Trump don't get paid. He's infected the federal government with his own unethical business practices.

None of this should come as a surprise, of course. Trump told us, quite literally, from Day One that he wouldn't give up his lifestyle to run for — or be — president. In his presidential announcement speech, he said: "I said, you know what I'll do. I'll do it. Because a lot of people said, 'He'll never run. Number one, he won't want to give up his lifestyle.' They're right about that, but I'm doing it."

He warned us. And a lot of us didn't listen.

Open Wide...

Solar Eclipse Day!

image of a solar eclipse

It has finally arrived — the much-discussed day on which parts of the United States will be able to witness a total solar eclipse. In case you haven't heard yet, DON'T LOOK AT IT WITH YOUR NAKED EYES!

Care of NASA, here is a video (no audio) showing the path of the eclipse across the U.S.:


At the L.A. Times, Jon Schleuss has everything you need to know about the eclipse, including a countdown clock to when it'll be over your head, and what percentage of the eclipse you'll see.

[Content Note: Video may autoplay at link] And at Time, Jeffrey Kluger writes on "The Beauty and Science of a Total Solar Eclipse."

Please feel welcome and encouraged to share neat things you've been reading on the eclipse, how you plan to spend the day, whether you're going to make an effort to see it, and any other eclipse-related goodness in comments!

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of a purple sofa

Hosted by a purple sofa. Have a seat and chat.

Open Wide...

The Virtual Pub Is Open

image of a pub Photoshopped to be named 'The Beloved Community Pub'
[Explanations: lol your fat. pathetic anger bread. hey your gay.]

Belly up to the bar,
and be in this space together.

(And don't forget to tip your bartender!)

Open Wide...

The Friday Blogaround

This blogaround brought to you by exhaustion.

Recommended Reading:

Amie Newman: [Content Note: Misogyny; death] The Rise of Rural 'Maternity Deserts'

Erin Williams: [CN: Misogyny; injury and death] Expanding Access to Safe Abortion in Nigeria, One Woman at a Time

Monica Roberts: [CN: Transmisogyny; violence; death] RIP Gwynevere River Song

Angry Asian Man: [CN: Racism; anti-Asian racist slurs] "Ching Chong": Teens Vandalize Cemetery with Racist Graffiti

DaMaris B. Hill: [video content] Digital Poem and Chapbook (This is exquisite. Make sure you find some time for it.)

Sameer Rao: [video content] This Special Dives Deep Inside "Unite the Right's" White Nationalist Horror

Rae Paoletta: New Image of Jupiter Is So Beautiful It's Making Us Angry

Leave your links and recommendations in comments. Self-promotion welcome and encouraged!

Open Wide...

Congrats on Getting Three Magazine Covers, Donald!

You know how Donald Trump just loooooooves to be on the covers of magazines! So much so that he's hung fake TIME magazine covers with his face on them in his golf palaces.

So he should be really thrilled to hear that he's made the cover of three prominent magazines this week: The Economist, The New Yorker, and Der Spiegel.

cover of the New Yorker, featuring a graphic of Trump in a sailboat, his own mouth driving wind into the sail, which is a Klan hood
cover of Der Spiegel, which simply depicts Trump wearing a Klan hood

I detect a theme!

I'm sure Donzo will be disappointed that he didn't also score the cover of Gold Toilet Aficionado Monthly, but your time will come, sir! Your time will surely come.

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Matilda the Fuzzy Cat in close-up, looking at me as she sits on a dining room chair
Queen Matilda.

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 211

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Here are some things in the news today:

Earlier today by me: Horrendous Hate Crime in Jackson, Michigan and Mike Pence Was Terrible Before Donald Trump and Bannon's Out.

I will start with two pieces of good resistance news today...

1. House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi has introduced the first resolution to censure Donald Trump for his Charlottesville remarks:
The President's repulsive defense of white supremacists demands that Congress act to defend our American values.

Today, Members led by Reps. Jerry Nadler, Bonnie Watson Coleman, and Pramila Jayapal have filed the first censure resolution against the President. Every day, the President gives us further evidence of why such a censure is necessary. Indeed, with each passing day, it becomes clearer that the Republican Congress must declare whether it stands for our sacred American values or with the President who embraces white nationalism.

Democrats will use every avenue to challenge the repulsiveness of [Donald] Trump's words and actions.
Pelosi is so fucking clever. She's forcing the GOP's hand and creating a paper trail like she's the head of HR. If she builds up enough censures onto which the Republican members can't not sign, then their case for not impeaching him gets very difficult.

2. Ed O'Keefe at the Washington Post: Members of White House Presidential Arts Commission Resigning to Protest Trump's Comments.
The remaining members of a presidential arts and humanities panel resigned on Friday in yet another sign of growing national protest of [Donald] Trump's recent comments on the violence in Charlottesville.

Members of the President's Committee are drawn from Broadway, Hollywood, and the broader arts and entertainment community and said in a letter to Trump that "Your words and actions push us all further away from the freedoms we are guaranteed."

"Reproach and censure in the strongest possible terms are necessary following your support of the hate groups and terrorists who killed and injured fellow Americans in Charlottesville," the commissioners wrote in a letter sent to the White House on Friday morning. "The false equivalencies you push cannot stand. The Administration's refusal to quickly and unequivocally condemn the cancer of hatred only further emboldens those who wish America ill. We cannot sit idly by, the way that your West Wing advisors have, without speaking out against your words and actions."
Soledad O'Brien noticed something interesting about the letter:


RESIST.

* * *

To my earlier point that Steve Bannon isn't really going anywhere...


Here's the thing: Steve Bannon has invested an enormous amount of time and energy fomenting a white supremacist uprising. He's not going to abandon it now.

Consider the timing of his "firing" for a moment: The Friday before a weekend in which white supremacist demonstrations are scheduled in cities all over the country. Do you think seeing their hero being "ousted" is going to make them more or less rageful, especially as they view it as evidence of "cucks" trying to take over the White House they feel they'd just captured?

Either this entire thing is being orchestrated to do maximum damage by enraging white supremacists, or it just looks that way by accident. I know which I think is more likely.

Sebastian Gorka will be "forced" out next. Stephen Miller after that. Eventually Trump will be the only "pure" one left. All of it is fodder to elicit the white supremacists' violent support of Trump's open pivot to straight-up dictator.

Immediately after typing those words, Aphra_Behn (obviously not knowing I'd typed them) sent me this:


WELP.

* * *

[Content Note: Violent threats] Alex Horton at the Washington Post: Mother of Slain Charlottesville Protester Says She's Received Death Threats. "Less than a week since her daughter Heather Heyer was killed in Charlottesville, Susan Bro says she has received threats against her life. 'I've had death threats already...because of what I'm doing right this second,' Bro told MSNBC on Thursday, one day after Heyer was buried and a vigil at the University of Virginia drew hundreds of candle-bearing supporters. ...Anchor Katy Tur, seemingly stunned when Bro said she was receiving threats, asked why they were coming. 'Talk is fear to them,' Bro responded, describing the white nationalists. 'I don't know why. Talk is fear.'" Such a tenacious woman.

Aaron Rupar at ThinkProgress: Mother of Charlottesville Victim Won't Talk to Trump, Citing His Defense of White Supremacist Rally. "During a Good Morning America interview on Friday, [Susan Bro] said that following [Donald] Trump's public defense of a white supremacist rally [during which her daughter was killed], she's no longer interesting in talking with him. ...'You can't wash this one away by shaking my hand and saying I'm sorry,' she said during the Good Morning America interview. 'I'm not forgiving for that.'"

I'd love to know how Trump explains this to himself, because he surely doesn't hear that Bro doesn't want to speak with him and reflect on why that might be and have a long, hard think about the kind of person he is. I'm guessing he just decides she's a hater and a loser and goes on with his shitty day.

Jeremy Diamond at CNN: As Trump Mulls Afghanistan, a Former General and Fallen Marine's Father at His Side. Jesus fucking Jones, that headline. That's precisely the sort of soft-focus, jingoistic bullshit that got us into wars like the one in Afghanistan in the first place. It's bad enough when it's an ordinary president, and Trump is no ordinary president. he's also clearly contemplating military action to bump his approval ratings upward, so maybe the political media could be wise enough to not help him in this vile endeavor.

Martin Matishak at Politico: Trump Elevates U.S. Cyber Command, Vows 'Increased Resolve' Against Threats. "Cyber Command has developed under the auspices of the NSA for years, sharing resources, staffing and infrastructure. Adm. Mike Rogers currently leads both organizations. But, [Kenneth Rapuano, assistant secretary of defense for homeland defense and global] said, the 'symbiotic' relationship between the two will eventually end, as the NSA's intelligence-collection mandate is quite different than Cyber Command's cyber war-fighting purview. Many specialists — even those who support such a split — are careful to note that cleaving the two is a long, difficult process that risks both sides losing out on valuable resources." Well, I'm sure the Trump administration will handle it well and our national security won't suffer at all j/k j/k j/k fuck.

* * *

Lots of people are VERY EXCITED that Mitt Romney said words about Donald Trump defending white supremacy. Yeah. I had some thoughts about that.


I know that was long, but let's be honest — this shit makes me so angry it's amazing I even managed to keep it just to that much!

I guess everyone has forgotten that Mitt Romney was last seen angling for a place in Donald Trump's administration. Of course we're meant to afford him the good faith of assuming that was because he wanted to try to stop Trump's worst excesses. How he earned such an extraordinary extension of good faith has never been clearly articulated to me by those urging me to extend it.

They don't feel they need to, of course. I'm meant to understand that we should reflexively afford him good faith because he's a white man.

And 'round and 'round we go.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

Bannon's Out

Steve Bannon is officially out as White House Chief Strategist. Depending on the source, he was fired or he resigned. Not that it really matters, since this entire thing is a fucking farce.


One of the problems with the "President Bannon" narrative is that it created an outsized expectation that things will change in the White House if only Bannon were gone.

The problem is that Bannon can wield an entirely different kind of influence from outside the White House.

The other problem is that there are still a lot of extremely dangerous and dreadfully vile people left inside the White House. Including and especially the actual president.

Open Wide...

Shaker Gourmet

Whatcha been cooking up in your kitchen lately, Shakers?

Share your favorite recipes, solicit good recipes, share recipes you've recently tried, want to try, are trying to perfect, whatever! Whether they're your own creation, or something you found elsewhere, share away.

Also welcome: Recipes you've seen recently that you'd love to try, but haven't yet!

* * *

Iain made bread in our breadmaker for the first time in a long while last weekend, and not only was it delicious, but the whole house smelled like warm bread for a day. So basically Iain made literal slices of happiness.

image of a loaf of fresh bread on a makeshift cooling rack

If you've got a breadmaker and are looking for the simplest of simple bread recipes, here's the one we used:

4 & 7/16 cups of bread flour
2 tsp salt
2 tbsp dry milk
2 & 1/2 tbsp butter
2 tbsp sugar
1 & 3/4 cups water
1 & 1/2 tsp dry yeast

(Follow the specific directions for cooking times on your breadmaker.)

Open Wide...

Mike Pence Was Terrible Before Donald Trump

At BuzzFeed, Tarini Parti reports that the Democratic opposition superPAC American Bridge 21st Century is already mobilizing to defeat Mike Pence, should he run for president in 2020. Their strategy is "focused on denying the vice president an opportunity to distance himself from the administration."

"Pence wants the public to think he's removed from Trump's scandals, but that's a lie, he's not," [Shripal Shah, vice president of American Bridge 21st Century] added. "He's complicit in all of it, dating back to the transition, Michael Flynn and Russia. His signature on the public documents we've uncovered discredit his attempts to plead ignorance."

..."There's no daylight between Trump and Pence and we're going to make sure people know that," Shah said.
Excellent, yes, make sure that Mike Pence can't escape Donald Trump for a nanosecond. And it's great to examine things like his record on hate crimes (which is terrible), in order to further tie him to specific Trump administration failures, but always remember that Mike Pence was terrible before he ever met Donald Trump.

The entirety of his record must be scrutinized, not just the stuff that shows there's no daylight between Trump and Pence. Pence is horrible all on his own, in unique ways.

His tenure as governor was filled with malice and negligence. I hope that anyone doing oppo research on Pence talks to Hoosiers, because there are vaults full of information just waiting for someone to come open them.

Open Wide...

Horrendous Hate Crime in Jackson, Michigan

[Content Note: Homophobia; arson; pet death; threats.]

Eastsidekate sent me this piece by Michael Fitzgerald at Towleroad about Nikki Joly and Chris Moore, whose house was burned down by an arsonist, killing their two dogs and three cats: Shaun, Tripp, Mokie, Tazz, and Nettie.

My condolences to Joly and Moore. The grief of losing five pets all at once, no less their home on top of it, must be enormous. I am so, so sorry.

Friends have set up a YouCaring page if you would are interested and able to donate to Joly and Moore.

Joly is the director of the Jackson Pride Center, which just opened in February of this year.

Kate Opalewski at PrideSource reports:

A recent email obtained from the city confirms threats of violence toward the LGBTQ community one week before the pride celebration held on Aug. 5. It comes from Jackson Area Landlord Association's President Robert Tulloch, who wrote in the email to members of Jackson's city council, "I saw something on a site about marching to Blackman Park and raising a flag? I hope they are not planning to raise a gay flag. That is an in your face declaration of war and will be met with a violent response. This IS the queer agenda."

Sources confirm efforts to advance pro-equality policies and the increasing visibility of the LGBTQ community in Jackson have been met with threats of violence from the beginning - when the pride center was opened in February, when the non-discrimination ordinance was passed in April, and when the city hosted its inaugural pride celebration last weekend.

Joly and Moore have been at the forefront of the fight for equality in the city of Jackson. City officials confirm their presence at several council meetings when anti-LGBTQ members of the community said they shouldn't have rights. They have publicly been "damned to hell" and called "sodomites."
Although many other members of their community have rallied around them, as of Wednesday, Jackson Mayor Bill Jors had yet to comment on this vile act of violent hatred in his community, and Michigan Governor Rick Snyder's deputy press secretary Tanya Baker "said he cannot comment on a specific law enforcement investigation that is still ongoing."

That the president of the landlord's association declared the raising of a Pride flag a "declaration of war" is chilling. That he further asserted that raising a Pride flag would "be met with a violent response" is horrific.

Obviously, I have no idea who committed this heinous act against Joly and Moore. I do, however, want to note that violent homophobia has always been inextricably intertwined with organized white supremacy. As white supremacists are empowered by the president, so homophobia is also empowered.

The investigation into the arson continues. I hope Joly and Moore get some semblance of justice.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of a pink couch

Hosted by a pink sofa. Have a seat and chat.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Suggested by Shakers catvoncat, Kathy_A, and ehrt74: "Oxford commas: Yes or no? ?"

Yes, yes, and yes.

Open Wide...

On the Terrorist Attack in Barcelona

[Content Note: Terrorism; injury; death.]

Today in a highly-trafficked tourist area of Barcelona, another terrorist drove a vehicle into a crowd, killing at least 13 people and injuring dozens more.

Islamic State claimed responsibility for the attack, which took place on Thursday afternoon when a large white Fiat van veered off the road at the top of La Rambla into a crowd of unsuspecting people. Within an hour, Spanish police confirmed they were treating it as a terrorist attack.

Later on Thursday evening, police said two suspected attackers had been arrested. The van driver was captured after he ran into two policeman at a checkpoint.

One of the suspects has been named as Driss Oukabir, an individual believed to be from north Africa, who is alleged to have rented the van used in the attack.

...A second van — presumed to be a getaway vehicle — had been hired at the same time as the Fiat from the Telefurgo rental company in Sabadell, near Barcelona, was found 80km away in Vic an hour and a half later.
The Guardian notes: "The use of weapons as a vehicle is now a well-established tactic and has been used in attacks in France, Germany, Sweden, and the UK in the past 13 months." And, of course, in Charlottesville just days ago, although the driver of that vehicle was a white supremacist terrorist.

The last decent president we had, Barack Obama, tweeted his solidarity with Spain in this terrible moment:


In contrast, Donald Trump tweeted his support, followed immediately by one of the most disgusting things he's ever tweeted, which is really saying something:


This apocryphal tale about WWI-era General John J. Pershing, is one Trump told on the campaign trail: "He took fifty bullets, and he dipped them in pig's blood. And he had his men load his rifles and he lined up the fifty people, and they shot 49 of those people. And the fiftieth person he said 'You go back to your people and you tell them what happened.' And for 25 years there wasn't a problem, okay?"

The story, which is a hoax spread via email forwards, has been widely and repeatedly debunked as historically inaccurate.

At NBC News, Benjy Sarlin notes: "In addition to celebrating what would be tantamount to a war crime, Trump's claim that such tactics ended terrorism is also inaccurate. The unrest he cited continued long afterwards and was rooted in conflict over colonial rule."

It is appalling that Trump would use this moment to revive this gross falsehood. He is so embarrassing, and just such a terrible person.

My condolences to the people who lost friends, family, neighbors, and colleagues in this terrible attack. My thoughts are also with the injured, and those who survived without physical injury, but may have to process lingering trauma. I'm so sorry.

The Guardian has live updates here. Please note that you may encounter images of the attack and its aftermath at that link.

As always, please keep this an image-free comments thread. Thank you.

Open Wide...

I Didn’t Vote for Trump. So I Have Nothing to Regret.

image of me holding a Hillary Clinton branded glass and smiling
I was with her. June 6, 2016.

Julius Krein, a conservative who founded the pro-Trump journal American Affairs, now regrets his vote for Donald Trump. What a story! Such an astounding story, in fact, that he has been given space at the New York Times to tell his amazing tale of being catastrophically wrong.

He uses an awful lot of words explaining how he came to be “riveted” by then-candidate Donald Trump, and pretending that Trump understands policy enough to be serious about it, before he comes to this:
From the very start of his run, one of the most serious charges against Mr. Trump was that he panders to racists. Many of his supporters, myself included, managed to convince ourselves that his more outrageous comments — such as the Judge Gonzalo Curiel controversy or his initial hesitance to disavow David Duke’s endorsement — were merely Bidenesque gaffes committed during the heat of a campaign.

It is now clear that we were deluding ourselves. Either Mr. Trump is genuinely sympathetic to the David Duke types, or he is so obtuse as to be utterly incapable of learning from his worst mistakes. Either way, he continues to prove his harshest critics right.
Even now. Even after Trump responded to a chilling display of white supremacist violence, in which one woman was killed and many others injured, by incredibly asserting “there’s blame on both sides.” Even after he insisted there were “very fine people” among the white supremacist provocateurs. Even after Trump has repeatedly employed a white supremacist talking point in defense of Confederate monuments.

Even now, Krein is not sure whether Trump is merely obtuse, or “sympathetic to the David Duke types.”

And he fails utterly to even entertain the possibility that Trump is himself an avowed white supremacist.

Which he clearly is.

Someone does not live a life careening from housing discrimination against Black applicants, to public musings on eugenics and the superiority of one’s own genes, to a crusade against exonerated men of color, to a birther campaign against the nation’s first Black president, to a presidential announcement address steeped in racism and nativism, to a campaign slogan that’s dogwhistled white supremacy, to anti-Semitic tweets and sloganeering, to an attack on a judge because of his ethnicity, to an entire campaign exploiting racial and xenophobic fears, to a presidential agenda centered around toxic attacks on immigrants and Muslims and demonizing cities with significant Black and/or immigrant populations, to defending Confederate monuments, and everything that has come before and in between, if one is merely obtuse.

Trump’s record on race is not one of accidental gaffes. It is one of a lifetime commitment to white supremacy.

And this, of course, is merely one of Krein’s failures to see Trump for who he really is. It is a monumental failure, and yet only one of many.

Donald Trump is a Russian nesting doll of character defects. Where other people have personality traits, Trump just has an endless promenade of red flags billowing in the breeze of his own shouted bravado. If there is a redeemable quality about the man, I have yet to see evidence of its existence.

And Krein overlooked all of it. Now he laments: “Far from making the transformative ‘deals’ he promised voters, his only talent appears to be creating grotesque media frenzies — just as all his critics said.”

Just as all his critics said. Not that they are being given space on the pages of the paper of record to make their case.

I was right about Donald Trump from the moment he announced his despicable candidacy. While highly paid (and highly visible) political commentators were having excited conversations about how “entertaining” Trump was, I was writing pieces about how dangerous Trump is, warning against treating him like a punchline.

Fully two years ago, I wrote: “The GOP would love it if we continue to treat Trump like a sideshow, instead of the uncensored id of their disgusting party that he really is.”

Where’s my New York Times spread for seeing plain as day one month into Trump’s campaign what Krein still cannot say with conviction: That Trump is a dangerous white supremacist who viciously exploits people who continue to extend him good faith, despite abundant evidence he doesn’t deserve any.

Krein’s piece comes immediately on the heels of the New York Times publishing the penned regret of a U-Va student newspaper editor who realized, only after Heather Heyer had been killed, that he had been “naive” about white supremacists.


What this tells us, among other things, is that the political media has not learned its lesson from the disastrous 2016. Still the voices of white men are prioritized, even when all they have to say is: I was wrong.

Maybe, just maybe, we should start listening to the people who got it right in the first place.

[Also published at Medium.]

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Dudley lying on the couch, with his loooong nose in close-up
The nose knows.

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 210

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Here are some things in the news today:

Earlier today by me: Today in White Supremacy White House and Steve Bannon: A Story in Three Parts. And by Fannie: Throwback Thursday to When We Were Gaslit About Bigotry.

In yesterday's We Resist installment, in which I discussed my own support of strategic violence against Nazis, I wrote: "I would punch a Nazi. And I would be fully prepared to deal with the consequences of that. I realize it's a criminal act to punch someone. And I'd still the fuck do it."

On that note, I started my day (thanks to Eastsidekate, who passed it along) watching a video of anti-racist activists in Durham, North Carolina, lining up at the sheriff's office to turn themselves in for toppling a Confederate monument.


Video Description: A line of people of different races, genders, ages, identities, all wearing black t-shirts, walk toward the front door of the sheriff's office. They are filmed by a number of people holding cameras, and cheered by onlookers, who then chant: "Thank you. We love you. Thank you. We love you. Thank you. We love you." A person stands in the crowd of onlookers holding a sign reading: "Tear Down White Supremacy."

This is what principled resistance looks like. They tore down a monument to white supremacy. Their civil disobedience was unlawful, if nonetheless deeply ethical. They showed up, proudly, to accept the consequences.

Incredibly moving.

* * *

In absolute contrast... Caitlin MacNeil at TPM: Trump Increasingly Angry, Isolated Amid Fallout from Charlottesville Response. "Trump has been acting out of anger and has become increasingly isolated in the White House this week. After his initial statement failed to offer a full-throated condemnation of white nationalist and other hate groups, Trump was pressured by his aides to follow up with a more forceful statement. But after doing so, the President became angry and suspicious about attempts to control his messaging, prompting him to follow up with an impromptu news conference Tuesday that went off the rails when he blamed both sides for the violence in Charlottesville, Politico reported. Trump felt vindicated following that presser, according to the Washington Post." Of course he did.

But the more Trump rages in defense of white supremacy, the more that he's going to invite invigorated pushback — including from Democrats who see an opportunity to exploit, for citizens' great benefit, the current rift (even if only rhetorically) between the White House and Congressional Republicans.

E.A. Crunden at ThinkProgress: Two Politicians Want to Take Down the Confederate Statues in the U.S. Capitol. "Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ) tweeted on Wednesday night that he would introduce a bill taking down Confederate statues in the building, though he did not give a specific timeline or indicate when the bill would be brought forward. ...House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) joined Booker's call to action on Thursday. 'If Republicans are serious about rejecting white supremacy, I call upon Speaker Ryan to join Democrats to remove the Confederate statues from the Capitol immediately,' Pelosi said."

Pelosi's entire statement reads:
The halls of Congress are the very heart of our democracy. The statues in the Capitol should embody our highest ideals, expressing who we are and who we aspire to be as a nation.

The Confederate statues in the halls of Congress have always been reprehensible. If Republicans are serious about rejecting white supremacy, I call upon Speaker Ryan to join Democrats to remove the Confederate statues from the Capitol immediately.

Under the leadership of Democrats in Congress, we have recognized more women and people of color in Congress's collection of statues, including Rosa Parks, Sojourner Truth, and Helen Keller. As Speaker, we relocated Robert E. Lee out of a place of honor in National Statuary Hall — a place now occupied by the statue of Rosa Parks.

There is no room for celebrating the violent bigotry of the men of the Confederacy in the hallowed halls of the United States Capitol or in places of honor across the country.

The number of Confederate statues at the Capitol is a major problem. It has been for a long time (always) — and the Democrats started addressing it when they were last the majority in Congress. But the progress came to a standstill once Republicans reclaimed the majority.

Following, a glimpse at the scope of the issue:

[Content Note: Video may autoplay at link] Amanda Terkel at the Huffington Post: The U.S. Capitol Is Basically a Confederate Statue Bazaar. "Just steps away from a statue of civil rights hero Rosa Parks stands the statue of Alexander Hamilton Stephens, who served as vice president of the Confederacy. The statue describes him as 'STATESMAN ― AUTHOR ―PATRIOT.' The inscription offers his credo: 'I am afraid of nothing on the earth, above the earth, beneath the earth, except to do wrong.' In 1861, he gave a speech in which he defended the institution of slavery and said it was 'an error' to assume 'the equality of the races.'"

Christopher Ingraham at the Washington Post: The U.S. Capitol Has at Least Three Times as Many Statues of Confederate Figures as It Does of Black People. "In the Capitol's National Statuary Hall Collection there are three times as many statues of Confederate soldiers and politicians as there are statues of Black people in the entire Capitol complex, according to records maintained by the Architect of the Capitol. ...Twelve of the statues memorialize individuals who either fought for the Confederacy or were active in Confederate politics. But not a single Black American is represented in the Statuary Hall Collection."


Think about that.

Finally on this subject, I did a Twitter thread earlier today on the "Washington/Jefferson" talking point employed in defense of Confederate monuments. That thread begins with this tweet (scroll down from there for the whole thing).

* * *

Esme Cribb at TPM: Phoenix Mayor Calls on Trump to Delay Planned Campaign Rally After Charlottesville.
Mayor Greg Stanton of Phoenix, Arizona on Wednesday called on [Donald] Trump to postpone a planned campaign rally in the city after violence erupted at a white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia.

"I am disappointed that [Donald] Trump has chosen to hold a campaign rally as our nation is still healing from the tragic events in Charlottesville," Stanton said in a statement.

He suggested that Trump might have scheduled the rally to "announce a pardon for former Sheriff Joe Arpaio," who was convicted in July of criminal contempt of court.

"Then it will be clear that his true intent is to enflame emotions and further divide our nation," Stanton said. "It is my hope that more sound judgment prevails and that he delays his visit."
Trump will not be delaying his visit, he confirmed this morning.

Meanwhile, just as North Korea was backing away from the edge of the nuclear cliff, Defense Secretary James Mattis inexplicably ratcheted the rhetoric back up today.


This is exactly what I was worried about yesterday. There isn't a single person in the Trump White House who isn't aware that military action increases support for presidents. They are all keenly aware of that upsetting reality — including Mike Pence, who [CN: video may autoplay at link] doubled-down on his support of Trump (and Trump's defense of white supremacy) yesterday, after his early return from his trip abroad. He's all in, on whatever plan they're cooking up.

* * *

In other news...

Michael S. Schmidt and Matt Apuzzo at the New York Times: Trump Lawyer Forwards Email Echoing Secessionist Rhetoric. "Trump's personal lawyer on Wednesday forwarded an email to conservative journalists, government officials and friends that echoed secessionist Civil War propaganda and declared that the group Black Lives Matter 'has been totally infiltrated by terrorist groups.' The email forwarded by John Dowd, who is leading the president's legal team, painted the Confederate general Robert E. Lee in glowing terms and equated the South's rebellion to that of the American Revolution against England. Its subject line — 'The Information that Validates President Trump on Charlottesville' — was a reference to comments Mr. Trump made earlier this week in the aftermath of protests in the Virginia college town. 'You cannot be against General Lee and be for General Washington,' the email reads, 'there literally is no difference between the two men.'"

Two things: 1. There are differences. Meaningful ones. 2. This administration is vasty overestimating my commitment to statues of former presidents. And I'm guessing I'm not the only one.

Matthew Nussbaum at Politico: Gorsuch to Headline Event at Trump Hotel. "Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch is slated to headline a September event at the Trump International Hotel. The 'Defending Freedom Luncheon,' hosted by the nonprofit Fund for American Studies, is an invitation-only event to celebrate 'the constitutional framework that has protected our free society and made America exceptional,' according to the group's website."


Ayana Byrd at Colorlines: Trump Signs Executive Order That Rolls Back More Obama-Era Environmental Rules.
Though [Donald] Trump used his press conference [Tuesday] (August 15) to make it clear what he thinks of Charlottesville and what he dubbed the 'alt-left,' the stated purpose of his speech was to announce how he is planning to upgrade the nation's infrastructure.

On Tuesday, the president signed an executive order to improve what he called the country's 'badly broken' infrastructure, which he likened to what could be found in a 'third world country.' The order calls for a $1 trillion revitalization package, though no legislation currently exists for this upgrade.

The order is intended to eliminate and streamline some of the permitting regulations needed to construct federally-funded roads, bridges, pipelines, and other infrastructure. ...In order to shorten the completion time for this and other structures, Trump's order will reverse a number of regulations put into place during former President Barack Obama's time in office. This includes a rollback of the Federal Flood Risk Management Standard, which was established by executive order in 2015. It requires the federal government to account for climate change and sea-level rise when building infrastructure. Bridges, schools, hospitals, and police and fire stations are some of the structures covered by this rule.
Who needs those?

(No one, in a nuclear wasteland.)

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

Please Support Shakesville

image of a piggy bank next to a sign reading: 'bi-monthly fundraising reminder'

teaspoon icon This is, for those who have requested it, your bi-monthly reminder to donate to Shakesville and an important fundraiser to keep Shakesville going.

If you value the content and/or community in this space, please consider setting up a subscription or making a one-time contribution.

If you have appreciated being able to tune into Shakesville and/or my Twitter feed for coverage of politics, for curated news about the Trump administration and/or the resistance, for media analysis, for a safe and image-free space to discuss difficult subjects, for the Fat Fashion or Shaker Gourmet threads, or for whatever else you appreciate at Shakesville, whether it's the moderation, community in the Open Threads, video transcripts, the blogarounds, or anything else, please remember that Shakesville is run exclusively on donations.

I cannot afford to do this full-time for free, but, even if I could, fundraising is also one of the most feminist acts I do here. I ask to be paid for my work because progressive feminist advocacy has value; because women's work has value.

I would certainly be grateful for your support, if you are able to chip in. The donation link is in the sidebar to the right. Or click here.

Thank you to each of you who donates or has donated, whether monthly or as a one-off. I am deeply appreciative. This community couldn't exist without that support, truly. Thank you.

My thanks as well to everyone who contributes to the space in other ways, whether as a contributor, a moderator, a guest writer, a transcriber, and/or as someone who takes the time to send me a note of support and encouragement. (Or cool artwork!) This community couldn't exist without you, either.

Please note that I don't want anyone to feel obliged to contribute financially, especially if money is tight. There is a big enough readership that no one needs to donate if it would be a hardship, and no one should ever feel bad about that. ♥

Open Wide...

Steve Bannon: A Story in Three Parts

Part One: Steve Bannon calls a Trump-critical writer at the lefty political magazine The American Prospect, under the auspices of appreciating an article he wrote on China, then gives an interview to that writer, during which Bannon pretends he's not a dedicated purveyor of white supremacy and simultaneously just happens to hand the perfect argument to lefties who believe that "identity politics" — that is, caring about the specific concerns of people other than straight, white, cis, able-bodied men — is a losing strategy for Democrats.

I asked Bannon about the connection between his program of economic nationalism and the ugly white nationalism epitomized by the racist violence in Charlottesville and Trump's reluctance to condemn it. Bannon, after all, was the architect of the strategy of using Breitbart to heat up white nationalism and then rely on the radical right as Trump's base.

He dismissed the far right as irrelevant and sidestepped his own role in cultivating it: "Ethno-nationalism—it's losers. It's a fringe element. I think the media plays it up too much, and we gotta help crush it, you know, uh, help crush it more."

"These guys are a collection of clowns," he added.

From his lips to Trump's ear.

"The Democrats," he said, "the longer they talk about identity politics, I got 'em. I want them to talk about racism every day. If the left is focused on race and identity, and we go with economic nationalism, we can crush the Democrats."
Suffice it to say that a founding member and former executive chair of Breitbart does not believe that white supremacy needs to be crushed. And suffice it to say that any lefty who takes political advice from Steve Bannon is a fool.

Naturally, this article got lots of attention, for a number of different reasons. So many people publicly wondered why Bannon had done this interview, as if there were any other explanation besides: Trump values strength and this was a major power play to foment existing divisions on the left, just at the moment when the administration risked the left rallying together against white supremacy.

Part Two: At Axios, an outlet known for its highly-placed White House sources, Jonathan Swan reports: "Steve Bannon thought he wasn't giving an interview."
Steve Bannon's White House colleagues can't believe what they're reading tonight — and here's the twist: neither can Bannon.

The White House chief strategist has told associates he never intended to do an "interview" with an editor at the American Prospect, a left-wing publication. ...Apparently Bannon never thought that the journalist might take his (very newsworthy) comments and turn them into a story. It's Anthony Scaramucci all over again (minus the curse words.)

The result is not good for Bannon, who is already under pressure, with colleagues lined up against him and a president who agrees with him ideologically but tells associates he thinks Bannon is a leaker.

Here's what one of Bannon's colleagues — somebody who's not an enemy of his — told me after reading the piece: "Since Steve apparently enjoys casually undermining U.S. national security, I'll put this in terms he'll understand: This is DEFCON 1-level bad."
So, here we're meant to believe that the incredibly media-savvy former Breitbart chief Bannon didn't expect for anything he said to a reporter he called to be published. He never requested that any of it be off the record; he's working for a White House plagued by leaks; and he asked to meet the reporter in person (though settled for a phone call) — but he never imagined that it would be printed. Sure.

I guess it's just extraordinarily good luck, then, that he offered a carefully crafted argument designed to divide the left one day after the president for whom he works used the term "alt-left" for the first time, sending many lefties into endless arguments about the use of the term.

Gee, I hope Bannon didn't get in BIG TROUBLE with his boss after being tricked into such a useful interview!

Part Three: Bannon tells the Daily Mail that his interview was a perfect distraction.
Steve Bannon said Thursday that his controversial interview with a liberal magazine writer was a positive for the White House since it slowed down the media's momentum in covering [Donald] Trump's remarks about the weekend's violence in Virginia.

Bannon told DailyMail.com that his remarks "drew fire away from POTUS"...and that he successfully "changed the [media] narrative" with a single phone call.

...Separately, a White House aide told DailyMail.com that Bannon's interview would be seen internally as a positive in one respect – his dismissal of "constant arguments about racism" as a prudent political strategy and his strong criticism of white nationalists as a "collection of clowns."

"The president doesn't like all the Democrats' focus on racism, and it's good that Steve mocked it as politically stupid," the aide said.
Wow, it's almost like Bannon knew what he was doing all along — and just coasted through this entire storm of media manipulation with the confidence of a man who knows he will be afforded good faith no matter how unearned, and no matter how absurd it might be to believe that an experienced rightwing media executive might be able to outsmart a reporter with flattery.

The Mail notes: "It's unclear if there has been any blowback in the West Wing from Bannon's unexpected on-the-record remarks to the magazine." I think we all know the answer to that.

Open Wide...