Maude Save Me


Trump has never shown an interest in policy detail. Ever. And still there are members of the press who are "surprised" by his lack of interest in policy detail.

You know, if the press had actually focused on policy for more than six seconds during the entire campaign, instead of drooling over "optics" for 18 months, perhaps more people would have noticed that Trump DOESN'T KNOW SHIT ABOUT SHIT AND DOESN'T CARE ABOUT ANYTHING.

Just a thought.

Open Wide...

Here Is Something Nice

Mark Freeley was walking his dogs, Storm and Sara, along the beach near the Long Island Sound when Storm ran off and jumped into the water after detecting a deer fawn in need of help. He swam to the struggling baby and grabbed her by the neck, dragging her to shore, where Storm proceeded to nudge and paw the panting deer, trying to help her recover.

image of a large white dog lying beside a deer fawn on a rocky beach

Freeley then wisely contacted an animal rescue team to help.
When Frank Floridia and Erica Kutzing of the Strong Island Animal Rescue League tried to get close to the deer, however, the skittish animal ran into the water again — this time, swimming even further out than before.

Floridia jumped into the water to save it.

"It was a do-or-die situation," the rescuer told the New York Daily News. "I really didn't have much of a choice. If I didn't go in the water, the deer would've died."

Thankfully, Floridia managed to bring the deer back to land. He and Kutzing then transported it to the Star Foundation, a Long Island nonprofit animal rescue organization.
In a Facebook update, the Strong Island Animal Rescue League reported the deer "will receive fluids, feedings, and when old enough she will be released back into the wild. She has a few superficial wounds from her exciting day but will survive."

Rescuer Kutzing says of the heroic dog who started this remarkable rescue: "I think we could all learn something from Storm. If we just learn to treat each other nicely and look out for each other, despite our differences, the world would be a better place."

And how. Good dog.

Open Wide...

Kids Today

[Content Note: Transphobia.]

Teenager Jasper Behrends defied the administrators at his northern Virginia high school and kept doing the art he wanted to do, even though the vice principal told him "although he had 'no problem' with the LGBTQ theme, there is a 'time and a place' for 'these things' and that it did not belong in public schools."

Imagine being the kind of person who tells a transgender student that their school is neither the time nor the place for art about being transgender.

An educational institution that doesn't acknowledge individual students' lived experiences is not only creating a missed opportunity for privileged students and engaging in a cruel neglect of marginalized students, but it's providing a poor education.

Despite that bullshit:

On behalf of the College Board, I am pleased to inform you that your artwork has been selected for inclusion in the 2017-2018 AP® Studio Art Exhibit. The exhibit is produced annually by the AP Program to honor and celebrate the work of outstanding AP Studio Art students.
Jasper "earned the highest possible score on his Studio Art Exhibit." And will undoubtedly go on to do better things with his life than be a shitbird to students one is meant to support and protect.

Congratulations, Jasper. Your art is exquisite.

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Dudley the Greyhound sitting on the couch and grinning, with his tongue lolling out of this mouth
This guy, lol.

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

The Depth of Republican Malice Is Extraordinary

The Republicans' attempt to repeal the Affordable Care Act has collapsed. (For now.) Trump has made a statement, during which he boasted about how amazing the failing vote was (sure), and said this:

We've had a lot of victories, but we haven't had a victory on healthcare. We're disappointed — I am very disappointed, because, again, even as a civilian, for seven years, I've been hearing about healthcare, and I've been hearing about "repeal and replace," and Obamacare is a total disaster; some states had over two hundred percent increase, a two hundred percent increase in their premiums, and their deductibles are through the roof, and it's an absolute disaster, and I think you'll also agree that I've been saying for a long time "Let Obamacare fail," and that everybody's going to have to come together and fix it, and come up with a new plan, and a plan that is really good for the people with much lower premiums, much lower costs, and much better protection. I've been saying that — Mike, I think you'll agree [Pence nods] — for a long time: "Let Obamacare fail." It'll be a lot easier. And I think we're probably in that position, where we'll just let Obamacare fail. We're not gonna own it. I'm not gonna own it. I can tell ya the Republicans are not gonna own it. We'll let Obamacare fail and then the Democrats are gonna come to us and they're gonna say, "How do we fix it? How do we fix it?" Or, "How do we come up with a new plan?"
That is the President of the United States saying that he will let a major healthcare expansion fail, out of fucking spite.

I've got news for him: If he and his vile party engineer the failure of Obamacare, they sure as shit are going to own that.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 180

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Here are some things in the news today:

Earlier today by me: Healthcare Update: The Worst Possibility Yet.

REMINDER: KEEP CALLING YOUR SENATORS TO TELL THEM TO VOTE NO ON REPEALING THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT.

[Content Note: Video may autoplay at link] Dan Merica at CNN: Pence on Health Care: 'Inaction Is Not an Option'. "Vice President Mike Pence, responding for the first time to the Senate's failure to pass an Obamacare repeal bill, said Tuesday that he and [Donald] Trump stand behind the new plan to repeal the health care plan now and replace it later. 'The Senate should vote to repeal now and replace later or return to the legislation carefully created in the House and the Senate. But either way, inaction is not an option,' Pence said. 'Congress needs to step up, Congress needs to do their job, and Congress needs to do their job now.'" Note that Mike Pence believes it is Congress' job to risk 32 million people losing their insurance just to get a win.


Mike DeBonis at the Washington Post: House GOP Unveils Budget Plan That Attaches Major Spending Cuts to Coming Tax Overhaul Bill.
The House Budget Committee blueprint, which is set for a Thursday committee vote, sets out special procedures that could ultimately allow Republicans to pass legislation over the objections of Senate Democrats who can normally block bills they oppose. GOP leaders in the House, as well as top Trump administration officials, hope to use those procedures — known as reconciliation — to pass a tax overhaul later this year.

The instructions in the draft budget, however, go well beyond tax policy and set the stage for a potential $203 billion rollback of financial industry regulations, federal employee benefits, welfare spending, and more. Those are policy areas where Republicans have, in many cases, already passed legislation in the House but have seen Democrats block action in the Senate.

House Budget Committee Chairman Diane Black (R-Tenn.) said the spending proposal is "not just a vision for our country, but a plan for action."

"In past years, our proposals had little chance of becoming a reality because we faced a Democratic White House," she said in a statement Tuesday. "But now with a Republican Congress and a Republican administration, now is the time to put forward a governing document with real solutions to address our biggest challenges."
And they still have to "set out special procedures" to ram it through. No wonder the Republican caucus doesn't object to Trump's authoritarianism and erosion of democracy: They are keenly aware that's what it takes to enact their highly unpopular agenda of aggressive malice.

See in particular: Voter suppression. Erica Orden and Byron Tau at the Wall Street Journal: GOP Seeks to Close Federal Election Agency. "House Republicans are seeking to defund the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, the sole federal agency that exclusively works to ensure the voting process is secure, as part of proposed federal budget cuts. The defunding move comes as the EAC is working with the Federal Bureau of Investigation to examine an attack late last year on the agency's computer systems by a Russian-speaking hacker."

It doesn't get any more blatant than that. I wasn't lying when I called them Democracy Killers.

* * *


Rosalind S. Helderman at the Washington Post: Eighth Person in Trump Tower Meeting Is Identified. "Ike Kaveladze's presence was confirmed by Scott Balber, an attorney for Emin and Aras Agalarov, the Russian developers who hosted the Trump-owned Miss Universe pageant in 2013. Balber said Kaveladze works for the Agalarovs' company and attended as their representative. ...Balber said Kaveladze believed he would act as a translator, but arrived to discover that the lawyer, Natalia Veselnitskaya had brought her own translator, a former State Department employee named Anatoli Samochornov."


That does not mean that only eight people attended. That means we have eight confirmed attendees so far.


Allegra Kirkland at TPM: NY Prosecutors Issue New Subpoena for Manafort Bank Records. "New York prosecutors have issued a subpoena seeking bank records from former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort related to real estate loans of up to $16 million, the Wall Street Journal reported Monday. The Manhattan District Attorney's office has ordered the Federal Savings Bank, a small Chicago bank whose loans to Manafort make up almost a quarter of its equity capital, to turn over records related to loans issued for two properties owned by Manafort and his wife, according to the Journal."

Sam Stein and Asawin Suebsaeng at the Daily Beast: Trump's Campaign Conceded in a Memo That Comey Was Having Major Impact. "Elsewhere in his book, Green makes clear just how surprising the final win was to Trump's team. In the close of the campaign, he reports, chief strategist Steve Bannon had devised a scorched-earth approach to the close of the campaign that was premised on a Clinton victory. 'Our backup strategy,' he said of Clinton, according to Green, 'is to fuck her up so bad that she can't govern. If she gets 43 percent of the vote, she can't claim a mandate.' Later, Bannon added: 'My goal is that by November 8, when you hear her name, you're gonna throw up.'" Fuck this entire lot of fuckers.

* * *

Karen DeYoung at the Washington Post: U.S. Certifies That Iran Is Meeting Terms of Nuclear Deal. "The Trump administration certified to Congress late Monday that Iran has continued to meet the required conditions of its nuclear deal with the United States and other world powers. But senior administration officials made clear that the certification was grudging, and said that [Donald] Trump intends to impose new sanctions on Iran for ongoing 'malign activities' in non-nuclear areas such as ballistic missile development and support for terrorism. ...Earlier in the day, Trump's national security adviser, Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster, and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin previewed the sanctions in a closed-door meeting with representatives of Washington-based think tanks. Reporters were not invited."

Colum Lynch at Foreign Policy: Tillerson to Shutter State Department War Crimes Office. "Secretary of State Rex Tillerson is downgrading the U.S. campaign against mass atrocities, shuttering the Foggy Bottom office that worked for two decades to hold war criminals accountable, according to several former U.S. officials. ...The decision to close the office comes at a time when America's top diplomat has been seeking to reorganize the State Department to concentrate on what he sees as key priorities: pursuing economic opportunities for American businesses and strengthening U.S. military prowess. Those changes are coming at the expense of programs that promote human rights and fight world poverty, which have been targeted for steep budget cuts."

Andrew Arenge, Hannah Hartig, and Stephanie Perry at NBC News: Poll: American Fears of War Grow. "An overwhelming majority of Americans — 76 percent — are worried that the United States will become engaged in a major war in the next four years, according to a new NBC News|SurveyMonkey National Security Poll out Tuesday. Although Americans are concerned about a number of national security threats, a strong plurality (41 percent) believe that North Korea currently poses the greatest immediate danger to the United States, emerging as a more urgent concern than ISIS (28 percent) or Russia (18 percent), according to the poll, which was conducted online from July 10 through July 14." Welp.

Damian Paletta at the Washington Post: Steven Mnuchin, Trump's Treasury Secretary, Is Hurtling Toward His First Fiasco. "Mnuchin is hurtling toward his first fiasco, unable to get Congress, let alone his colleagues in the Trump administration, on board with a strategy to raise the federal limit on governmental borrowing. His struggles are casting doubt on whether the political neophyte, who made his name on Wall Street, has the stature in Washington to press through a vote on a measure that former treasury secretaries of both parties have said is critical to preserving the nation's reputation for financial stability." Huh. You mean someone with no relevant experience might have no idea what the fuck he's doing?! Shocking.

Finally, here's a palate cleanser care of the terrific Sarah Lerner, writing at Dame Magazine: Oh, White Men with Your Never-ending Need to Dictate the Democratic Platform. (I mean, this shit is still something we need to RESIST, but at least she writes about it in a way that I adore, lol.)
Perhaps most frustrating about this constantly recycled narrative around "identity politics" sinking the electoral chances of those on the left is that it is contradicted by data. The blatant bigotry that Trump voters rubber-stamped is often excused as "economic anxiety," but exit polls showed that Hillary Clinton won both the under-$30,000 and $30,000 to $49,999 brackets. And for all the talk of Trump's "populist" appeal, it was Clinton's economic message that voters preferred in nearly every swing state (yes, including the decisive Rust Belt) and across the country. Moreover, as The Atlantic reported, members of the white working class "who said their finances are only in fair or poor shape were nearly twice as likely to support Clinton compared to those who feel more economically secure."

Indeed, political scientists Brian Schaffner, Matthew MacWilliams, and Tatishe Nteta found that racism and sexism predicted support for Trump much more than economic dissatisfaction. As writers for The Nation put it in their own analysis, "The change in probability of a Trump vote for a white person with the highest to the lowest levels of racial animus is similar to changing their party identification from Republican to Democratic." In other words, Trump's dog whistles (which, let's be real, were really more like wolf howls) had a significant impact on voters' decisions, something that Barro also acknowledges, but feels should not be used to make white people feel bad. This does not make much practical sense to me: Why should Democrats shy away from calling this out if Trumpers prefer a bigoted message regardless? As Jezebel's Kara Brown noted, "Racism and bigotry are not the result of unfriendliness nor will they be undone by the opposite."
Indulging bigotry as "cultural difference" does nothing but give permission to hold onto that bigotry. What is actually effective in eradicating bigotry is making it fucking unpopular. It's amazing how much more likely people are to abandon beliefs which are simply given no harbor. Yes, there will always be hold-outs, but it forces them to navigate being ostracized as extremists as the cost of their bigotry. Which is at it should be. The only thing that happens when you tolerate bigotry in order not to alienate bigots is that more people feel comfortable embracing and espousing bigotry.

Fuck that.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

And Again

[Content Note: Police brutality; guns; death.]

Over the weekend, 40-year-old Justine Damond, a white woman, was fatally shot by police in Minneapolis after calling them to report what she thought was a sexual assault in an alley behind her home.

When police arrived, she "reportedly approached the driver's side window of the police car when it arrived in the alley and an officer shot across his partner at Damond more than once from the passenger seat."

She was wearing pajamas and was not carrying a weapon.

However, she "may have been holding a mobile phone, which was reportedly found near her body." That raises the possibility that the officer mistook her mobile for a weapon, which would not be the first time someone was killed by police holding a mobile, despite the fact that mobiles are now ubiquitous and many people gesture while holding their phones as second nature.

But we don't yet know for sure, because the statements of the involved officers have not been made public. And their body camera footage cannot be made public because it doesn't exist: The officers' cameras were not turned on, in violation of protocol.

The BCA confirmed the officer and his partner's body cameras were not turned on and their police car dashboard camera did not capture the incident. The Minneapolis mayor, Betsy Hodges, told reporters she has "a lot of questions why the body cameras were not on."

Lt Bob Kroll, president of the Minneapolis Police Federation representing officers, said "the federation has decided to reserve all comment until case completion in the matter."

Teresa Nelson, interim executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota, said the officers violated police policy by not turning on their body cameras.

"This violation of policy thwarted the public's right to know what happened to Ms Damond and why the police killed her," Nelson said. "The two officers broke the policy not only when they didn't activate the body cameras before the incident, but also when they failed to do so after the use of force."
My condolences to Justine Damond's family, friends, colleagues, and community. I hope that they get the answers they seek, and something resembling justice — although true justice will be no one ever being shot and killed by police ever again.

On another note: White people who only care about police violence now that a white woman was shot, I see you.

Open Wide...

What in Fat-Hating Hell Is This?

[Content Note: Body policing; fat hatred.]

The very last thing I want to be obliged to do is defend Donald fucking Trump in any way, but Ben Strauss at Politico has written a truly contemptible piece of vile fat-hating, body policing, and health auditing about Trump, so here we are.

There is a lot wrong with this piece, and I could spend the next three hours or so of my life deconstructing the many, many problems with it, but instead I will simply highlight one sentence, which is the attempt to justify the existence of a nearly 3,000-word article about how Donald Trump is fat and doesn't exercise: "All this scrutiny might seem like body shaming if it weren't for Trump's own obsession with appearances."

NOPE. All that scrutiny is still actually body shaming. That Trump does it to other people doesn't neutralize it when it gets done to him. That's not how it works.

There is no excuse — none — for publishing this lengthy exercise in fat hatred, the entirety of which is basically the equivalent of a Disney film using fat as shorthand to convey that a character is evil.

montage of fat Disney villains

Trump is incompetent, cruel, vainglorious, ethically bankrupt, intellectually lazy, morally repugnant, disloyal, nepotistic, avaristic, egomaniacal, insecure, impulsive, and corrupt, and not a single one of those character traits is unique to fat people — even though fat is frequently used to indicate precisely these moral failings, in pop culture and literature dating back hundreds of years.

On my long list of concerns about Donald Trump, what he looks like doesn't make the cut.

And suffice it to say I am not fooled by fat hatred masquerading as concerns about his health, under the auspices that the United States President owes healthfulness to the nation he petitioned to serve.

Finally, as a fat person who spends her days documenting and protesting and resisting every single abusive thing Trump is doing, I take strong issue with the implication that fatness is an indication of low moral character.

If someone is fat, here is what that can tell you about them in total: They are fat.

The end.

Open Wide...

Healthcare Update: The Worst Possibility Yet

Last night, after Republican Senators Jerry Moran of Kansas and Mike Lee of Utah rebelled and announced they would not vote for the latest version of the Senate healthcare bill, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell issued a statement saying he would pursue the worst possible avenue: Voting only on repealing the Affordable Care Act with no immediate replacement plan.

Regrettably, is it now apparent that the effort to repeal and immediately replace the failure of Obamacare will not be successful.

So, in the coming days, the Senate will vote to take up the House bill with the first amendment in order being what a majority of the Senate has already supported in 2015 and that was vetoed by then-President Obama: a repeal of Obamacare with a two-year delay to provide for a stable transition period to a patient-centered health care system that gives Americans access to quality, affordable care.
This is not good news. At TPM, Tierney Sneed reports: "The 2015 legislation would repeal many of Obamacare's taxes immediately, while repealing its Medicaid expansion and its tax credits for insurance after two years. It would leave in place Affordable Care Act market reforms, and the Congressional Budget Office estimated that it would lead to 32 million more uninsured by 2026 — even more than the 22 million fewer people with insurance that the CBO estimated would be the result of the Better Care Reconciliation Act."

The Senate leader of the Republican Party is willing to risk 32 million people losing their insurance just to get a win.

If this doesn't definitively prove that the entire point of this ghoulish endeavor has been to scorch Obamacare from the face of the earth, in vicious retribution for President Obama having managed to pass such significant legislation in spite of Republican obstructionism, I don't know what possibly could.

Start calling your senators now and let their office know in no uncertain terms that you stridently object to any vote to repeal Obamacare.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

Hosted by a turquoise sofa. Have a seat and chat.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

[Content Note: Scatological humor.]

Suggested by Shaker RachelB: "What is the most amusing-to-you euphemism you've ever heard?"

There are about a zillion amusing (to me) euphemisms for "having a bowel movement," but the best I've ever heard, and it still makes me laugh, is when Spudsy, writing about his fear of shitting in public, said: "Maude forbid, if I'm out at a bar and I have to punch a grumpy, I'll go the fuck home."

Punch a grumpy! *falls over laughing*

Open Wide...

The Monday Blogaround

This blogaround brought to you by oil paintings.

Recommended Reading:

Beth Van Schaack: State Department Office of Global Criminal Justice on the Chopping Block — Time to Save It

Dr. Jen Gunter: GOOP's Misogynistic, Mansplaining Hit Job

Marykate Jasper: [Content Note: Homophobia; violence; eliminationism] In Horrific Interview, Chechen Leader Says Gay Men Are "Not People" and Don't Exist in Chechnya

Monica Roberts: [CN: Transphobia] You're in a Human Rights Fight Right Now

Amie Newman: Science Says Period Brains Aren't a Thing; Women Are Not Surprised

Aditi Natasha Kini: [CN: Racism; misogyny; homophobia] The Problem with Aladdin

Sameer Rao: Oprah Winfrey and Co. Travel the Cosmos in A Wrinkle in Time Trailer

Rae Paoletta: Fly over Pluto in This Incredibly Detailed New NASA Video

Tom Warren: Atari's New Ataribox Console Will Be Like an NES Classic

Leave your links and recommendations in comments. Self-promotion welcome and encouraged!

Open Wide...

Democracy Killers

Me, just earlier today: "Again, I will note that the Republican Party is pursuing this wildly unpopular legislation with a vigor that suggests a party who believes they will never have to be accountable to voters again. That seems worrying, no?"

Christopher Ingraham at the Washington Post:

The day after Donald Trump was elected president, Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, now the vice-chair of Trump's commission on voter fraud, told Trump's transition team of a proposal to change federal law to allow stricter requirements on voter registration.

Kobach's team was "putting together information on legislation drafts for submission to Congress early in the administration," Kobach wrote to transition team member Gene Hamilton in an email. "I have some already started regarding amendments to the NVRA [National Voter Registration Act] to make clear that proof of citizenship requirements are permitted (based on my ongoing litigation with the ACLU over this)."

...Amending the NVRA in such a manner "will lead to a dramatic reduction in access to voting," said Wendy Weiser, director of the democracy program at NYU's Brennan Center, in an interview.
The day after Trump was elected. Oh.

As a reminder, the chair of this commission is Vice President Mike Pence.

Open Wide...

Fat Fashion

This is your semi-regular thread in which fat women can share pix, make recommendations for clothes they love, ask questions of other fat women about where to locate certain plus-size items, share info about sales, talk about what jeans cut at what retailer best fits their body shapes, discuss how to accessorize neutral colored suits, share stories of going bare-armed for the first time, brag about a cool fashion moment, whatever.

* * *

Today I am making a recommendation that I never thought I would make, since my multi-decade search for a sports bra that works well for me has never yielded anything even close to recommendable territory, but MIRACLES HAPPEN! I present to you Lane Bryant's Cooling No-Wire Sport Bra.

image of a chubby woman with brown skin modeling a black sports bra
^ Not me.

Unfortunately, it only comes in Lane Bryant's absurdly limited size range, but, if you happen to be within this range, and you're looking for a sports bra that gives you some lift and support without underwire and also doesn't make your boobs feel like they're being cooked in a microwave, I highly recommend this beauty.

In related news: Lane Bryant has every single bra on sale today. There are different deals, and some of them are really good. A few Buy 2 Get 2 Free deals, which is pretty terrific since BRAS ARE STUPIDLY EXPENSIVE.

Anyway! As always, all subjects related to fat fashion are on topic, but if you want a topic for discussion: What's your experience with bras? Got any good recommendations or advice?

Have at it in comments! Please remember to make fat women of all sizes, especially women who find themselves regularly sizing out of standard plus-size lines, welcome in this conversation, and pass no judgment on fat women who want to and/or feel obliged, for any reason, to conform to beauty standards. And please make sure if you're soliciting advice, you make it clear you're seeking suggestions—and please be considerate not to offer unsolicited advice. Sometimes people just need to complain and want solidarity, not solutions.

Open Wide...

Trump Was Inevitable

In response to Joe Scarborough's ridiculous op-ed for the Washington Post, in which the former Republican Congressman further tries to distance himself from the rise and domination of Trump in the Republican Party, I've got a post at Medium: "Trump Is Not an Anomaly of Republican Politics; He Is the Inevitable Endgame."

I posted it there because much of the text will be familiar to longtime readers in this space, as I've posted it in various forms here (and once at Shareblue) over the years. I keep tinkering with it, and keep republishing it by necessity. Unfortunately, the idea that the Republican Party hasn't deliberately cultivated bigotry as a central part of its winning strategy never seems to go away.

Anyway. There's some new stuff, so head on over if you want to read it, and please share it if you are so inclined!

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Matilda the Fuzzy Sealpoint Cat curled up asleep under my desk
Matilda curled up in "classic cat" position under my desk.

She usually chills out or naps in such ridiculous positions that it was actually shocking to me to find her in such a normal position, lol.

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 179

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Here are some things in the news today:

Earlier today by me: Get Well Soon, McCain—Then Reconsider Your Politics and The Lying Liars Tell More Lies About Don Jr.'s Meeting.

REMINDER: KEEP CALLING YOUR SENATORS TO TELL THEM TO VOTE NO ON TRUMPCARE.

[Content Note: Video may autoplay at link] Igor Bobic at the Huffington Post: Tom Price Says Insurers Should 'Dust Off How They Did Business Before Obamacare'.
Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price suggested Sunday that the nation's health insurance system ought to operate as it did before the Affordable Care Act was passed.

During an appearance on ABC's "This Week," Price was asked to respond to a blistering criticism of the Senate Republicans' health care proposal by two major groups representing the U.S. health insurance industry. In a letter to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) earlier this week, the groups called the latest version of the bill "simply unworkable in any form" and warned that it would cause "widespread terminations of coverage" to people with serious medical problems.

"It's really perplexing, especially from the insurance companies, because all they have to do is dust off how they did business before Obamacare," Price said...

In discussing their health care plan, Republicans do not usually speak as candidly as Price about returning the nation's health care system to its pre-Obamacare period, a period marked by egregious insurance company abuses. Protections for pre-existing conditions remain highly popular around the country, and GOP lawmakers are loath to admit their policies would weaken them.

Prior to Obamacare, 79 million — more than one in four Americans — either lacked health insurance or were underinsured. The poor, especially, lacked adequate coverage.
A perfect and terrible reminder from the Secretary of Health and Human Services that Donald Trump's cabinet appointees were chosen based on their willingness to destroy the departments they were chosen to lead. By the time Price is done with his tenure, I suspect a more accurate name will be the Department of No Health and No Human Services.

Ellee Achten at Rewire: West Virginia Families, Just Learning About Health-Care Access, Fear It Will Be Taken Away. "It is well known that Planned Parenthood offers contraception, testing for sexually transmitted diseases, and pregnancy services, as well as abortion services and referrals, but West Virginians also receive hormone therapy, and testing and treatment for HIV, while others take their entire families to the clinics for general health care. Planned Parenthood centers — like the one Calloway visits in Vienna — offer extensive health services to their communities, especially to those with lower incomes. And, as Calloway noted, some patients are even seeking help at Planned Parenthood in battling opioids — a long-term and yet rising concern for Central Appalachia. 'We all made the choice to go to Planned Parenthood for different reasons,' said Calloway, who wanted to give Senators more than a story, but a face. 'Putting politics aside, we rely on Planned Parenthood,' she said."

Noam N. Levey at the LA Times: Obamacare Repeal Bills Could Put Coverage out of Reach for Millions of Sick Americans. "Both the House GOP bill that passed in May and the revised Senate GOP bill unveiled last week effectively eliminate the coverage guarantee by allowing health insurers to once again sell skimpier plans and charge more to people with preexisting health conditions who need more-comprehensive coverage. At the same time, the House and Senate bills dramatically scale back financial aid to low- and moderate-income consumers, and slash funding for Medicaid, the government safety-net plan that has helped millions of sick and poor Americans gain coverage. That combination — looser insurance requirements and less financial assistance for patients — will once again put health plans out of reach for millions of sick Americans, according to numerous analyses."


Again, I will note that the Republican Party is pursuing this wildly unpopular legislation with a vigor that suggests a party who believes they will never have to be accountable to voters again. That seems worrying, no?

* * *

[CN: War; death] Samuel Oakford at the Daily Beast: Trump's Air War Has Already Killed More Than 2,000 Civilians. "Airwars researchers estimate that at least 2,300 civilians likely died from Coalition strikes overseen by the Obama White House — roughly 80 each month in Iraq and Syria. As of July 13, more than 2,200 additional civilians appear to have been killed by Coalition raids since Trump was inaugurated — upwards of 360 per month, or 12 or more civilians killed for every single day of his administration. ...Airwars estimates that the minimum approximate number of civilian deaths from Coalition attacks will have doubled under Trump's leadership within his first six months in office." Fucking hell.

This sounds very much like precisely what Trump threatened to do when he was a candidate, having told Fox News host Brian Kilmeade in December 2015 that, unlike Obama, who he accused of waging "a very politically correct war," he "would knock the hell out of ISIS... One of the problems that we have and one of the reasons we're so ineffective, they're using [civilians] as shields. ...With the terrorists, you have to take out their families. When you get these terrorists, you have to take out their families."

So Trump's "politically incorrect" war doesn't care about civilian casualties. And, as a result, an enormous number of civilians are being killed — which is not only breathtakingly cruel but also ineffective, as airstrikes long ago "replaced Guantรกnamo as the recruiting tool of choice for militants." This is not making us more safe. Even if it were, it would be hideous that our safety came at the expense of the lives of innocent people, whom the U.S. president dismisses as "shields," stripping them of all humanity to encourage our indifferent as his decision to carelessly kill them.

* * *

[CN: Nativism; exploitation] Alex Horton at the Washington Post: Foreign-Born Recruits, Promised Citizenship by the Pentagon, Flee the Country to Avoid Deportation. "About 1,000 of those recruits have waited so long that they have fallen out of legal immigration status. An internal Defense Department memo obtained by The Post acknowledges that canceling these contracts would expose the recruits to deportation. In response, lawmakers urged Defense Secretary Jim Mattis to honor the contracts of those recruits. The recruits, who have already sworn allegiance to the United States in their oaths of enlistment, could potentially face harsh interrogations or jail time if they are deported to countries such as China or Russia, said Tom Malinowski, former assistant secretary of state for democracy, human rights, and labor in the Obama administration." Unconscionable. This is absolutely heinous treatment of people who aided the U.S.

[CN: Nativism] Tina Vasquez at Rewire: Trump's Wall Sees Windfall and Many Don't Know Why. "Vicki Gaubeca, director of the Regional Center for Border Rights for the ACLU of New Mexico, told Rewire that her real concern is that politicians continue making decisions about what is needed at the border without consulting border communities. 'At a time when migration from Mexico has been at zero, apprehensions at the border are going down, and border communities are already experiencing militarization with little accountability and oversight, the question that begs to be asked is why do we need more resources at the border?' Gaubeca said." (Maybe the wall is actually less about keeping people out than keeping people in?)

[CN: Animal harm] Natasha Geiling at ThinkProgress: A Texas Wildlife Refuge Will Be Razed to Build the First Section of Trump's Wall. "The Santa Ana Wildlife Refuge comprises 2,088-acres along the U.S.-Mexico border, and was established in 1943 for the protection of migratory birds. The refuge is home to at least 400 species of birds, 450 types of plants, and half of the butterfly species found in North America. It is also home to the highly-endangered ocelot. Federal officials told the Texas Observer that the wall would consist of an 18-foot levee wall that would stretch for three miles in the wildlife refuge. The construction plan would require building a road south of the wall, as well as clearing land on either side. Such construction would 'essentially destroy the refuge,' an official told the Texas Observer." FUCK.

[CN: Nativism; Islamophobia; misogynist violence] Michelle Chen at the Guardian: Why Trump's Travel Ban Hits Women the Hardest. "On top of alienating an entire religious community, Trump's even longer ban on future refugee admissions deepens a hidden dimension of the crisis: the endemic gender injustice of warfare. ...According to US humanitarian organization Tahirh Justice Center, which focuses on gender-based human rights abuse, women face a disproportionate share of the trauma because at every stage in the refugee journey, even outside of the direct conflict zone, they 'find themselves unable to get out of situations that might threaten their safety...' Moreover they face ancillary gender-based human rights violations that tend to explode in conflict situations, including epidemics of sexual abuse and labor and sexual trafficking." I hate Trump so much.

Not good:


Meanwhile, the one person who has done something in vaguely in accordance with the law and ethical norms in the Trump administration is considered a betrayer by the president. Jonathan Swan at Axios: Trump Hasn't Forgiven Sessions for Russia Recusal. "Trump's initial fury about Sessions' recusal from the Russia probe has turned to a simmering resentment that may have permanently poisoned their relationship, according to sources close to both of them. ...Trump's top-line association for Sessions: The guy who showed tremendous weakness and caused tremendous problems by needlessly recusing himself from the Russia investigation." Welp.

Dylan Stableford at Yahoo News: Outgoing Federal Ethics Chief: 'We Are Pretty Close to a Laughingstock at This Point'.
The federal government's top ethics chief is resigning on Wednesday. And he's torching the Trump administration on his way out.

Walter M. Shaub Jr., director of the Office of Government Ethics, told the New York Times that [Donald] Trump's apparent disdain for long-established ethical norms has undermined the credibility of the United States around the world.

"It's hard for the United States to pursue international anti-corruption and ethics initiatives when we're not even keeping our own side of the street clean," Shaub told the Times in an article published Monday. "I think we are pretty close to a laughingstock at this point."

Shaub — who has been a vocal critic of Trump's since his election — said the president's frequent trips to his family-owned golf clubs are a microcosm of just how blurry the line between the White House and Trump brand has become.

"It creates the appearance of profiting from the presidency," Shaub said. "Misuse of position is really the heart of the ethics program, and the internationally accepted definition of corruption is abuse of entrusted power. It undermines the government ethics program by casting doubt on the integrity of government decision making."

Trump spent last weekend at another one of his golf courses, and repeatedly promoted the U.S. Women's Open Championship held there.
Unreal.

I deeply appreciate the organizations, like CREW, who are trying to hold Trump accountable for this shit. CREW, in fact, had a bit of good news this morning:


The only problem is that I don't trust for a moment that the records they get will reflect reality. If they haven't been fudged all along, I fully anticipate that Mar-a-Lago will tamper with them before submission. Sigh.

[CN: Video may autoplay at link] Veronica Stracqualursi at ABC News: Trump Reaches a Low Even He Can't Ignore. "Few want a tweeter-in-chief: The ABC News-Washington Post poll out this morning shows that 67 percent of Americans don't like [Donald] Trump's use of Twitter and 70 percent say Trump has acted in an 'unpresidential' manner since taking office. [The poll also] shows Trump's six-month approval rating at 36 percent, the lowest of any president at this point in 70 years."

Goddddddddddd just fucking resign already! SHIT.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

The New Who

The thirteenth Dr. Who was revealed over the weekend in a perfect announcement video:

A cloaked figure walks through the woods. Ominous music. The figure lifts their hand and opens it, palm up. Electrical crackle. A key appears. The figure pulls back the hood of the cloak, revealing...a woman! She smiles and walks toward the TARDIS. Text onscreen: "Introducing Jodie Whittaker: The 13th Doctor." BBC logo.
Cue the high-frequency caterwauling of millions of misogynist dude-nerds!

I'm not going to recount any of their execrable complaining here. I don't even need to — whatever you're imagining, I assure you it's correct. They are as predictable as they are pathetic.

You already know how I feel about the sort of people who can dream up or dive into fantastical worlds filled with abundant magic and conjured technologies and fictional beings, but can't stretch their brains far enough to imagine a woman as a hero. But let me just go ahead and express my feelings once more, for the record.


Thank you and have a nice day.

Open Wide...

The Lying Liars Tell More Lies About Don Jr.'s Meeting


Rep. Adam Schiff makes me laugh-sob on the regular, and the above is certainly no exception. The spinning from Team Trump on Don Trump Jr.'s meeting with Kremlin-connected lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya has been incredible, even by the woeful expectations engendered by this lot of miscreants.

The latest dodge, offered by Donald Trump attorney Jay Sekulow — who was all over the Sunday talk shows — is to argue that there couldn't have been anything sinister about the meeting since the Secret Service didn't prevent the meeting.

On ABC's This Week, Sekulow said: "Well, I wonder why the Secret Service, if this was nefarious, why the Secret Service allowed these people in. The president had Secret Service protection at that point, and that raised a question with me."

Nice try. Just one problem with that:
In an emailed response to questions about Sekulow's comments, Secret Service spokesman Mason Brayman said the younger Trump was not under Secret Service protection at the time of the meeting, which included Trump's son and two senior campaign officials.

"Donald Trump, Jr. was not a protectee of the USSS in June, 2016. Thus we would not have screened anyone he was meeting with at that time," the statement said.

...The Secret Service's mission is to provide physical protection for the U.S. president. The agency also protects major presidential candidates. But its role in vetting people who meet with a U.S. president or candidates is limited to ensuring physical safety.
So, the Secret Service wasn't protecting Don Jr., and, even if they had been, they wouldn't have vetted anyone's general "nefariousness."

But a closer look at Sekulow's statement reveals he wasn't even suggesting Don Jr. was under Secret Service protection. "The president had Secret Service protection at that point," he says. Is he accidentally revealing that Donald Trump was at the meeting himself, despite having repeatedly claimed to know nothing about it until a few days before the New York Times report?

At Business Insider, Natasha Bertrand takes a look at the timeline:
According to media reports from that time, Trump was at Trump Tower at 4 p.m. while the meeting was taking place in his son's office. The only public event the then-candidate attended that day was a fundraising lunch for the Trump Victory Fund, CNN reported, and he was back at Trump Tower by 1 p.m.

...The meeting lasted "15 to 20 minutes," according to Sekulow. Trump Jr. had said it lasted about half an hour. Either way, at 4:40, roughly 40 minutes after the meeting began, Trump began tweeting about Clinton's emails.

"Where are your 33,000 emails that you deleted?" Trump tweeted in response to a quip from Clinton.
What Trump is asking us to believe is that he just coincidentally tweeted about Hillary Clinton's emails within a half hour of his son having a meeting with Russians who promised to deliver some dirt on Clinton — the very same emails he publicly invited the Russians to produce via hacking at a press conference a month later — but didn't know anything about the meeting or its contents until a year later. Sure.

That not only defies logic, but defies everything we know about Donald Trump.
Trump Jr. has said the meeting was inconsequential and a waste of time. But Sekulow's comment about the Secret Service, and Trump's reported presence at Trump Tower while the meeting was taking place, raise questions about how plausible it is that his son, campaign manager, son-in-law, and Secret Service detail (if they were made aware of the rendezvous) never told him about it or that he did not attend.

That is especially true given Trump's hands-on approach to all aspects of his business empire, biographer Tim O'Brien has noted. According to a former business associate, Jody Kriss, "Donald [Sr.] was always in charge."

"Donald had to agree to every term of every deal and had to sign off on everything," Kriss, who worked with the real-estate company Bayrock before leaving because he was convinced it was a money-laundering front, told O'Brien last month. "Nothing happened unless he said it was OK to do it. Even if Donald Jr. shook your hand on a deal, he came back downstairs to renegotiate if his father told him to."
The claim that Donald Trump didn't know about this meeting is just utter horseshit. And that is the way the media should be approaching this story, frankly: It defies belief that he didn't. Proceed accordingly.

And while we're on the subject of members of the Trump administration who love to claim they don't know nuttin' about nuttin'...


They're all on the hook for this one. Every last one of them.

Open Wide...

Get Well Soon, McCain—Then Reconsider Your Politics

Senator John McCain went in for surgery this weekend to remove a blood clot from above his left eye. Per the New York Times, it is a fairly serious procedure that usually requires several weeks of recovery.

When the surgery was announced, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell announced that the healthcare vote would be delayed at least a week to give McCain time to return.

Because McConnell needs his vote to repeal the Affordable Care Act.


Naturally, after tweeting that, I got a few admonishments that I should be nicer. Yes, of course I should — because the one thing we've never tried is asking politely for Republicans not to pass legislation that will take away health insurance from millions of people, resulting in unnecessary suffering and death.

I hope McCain does recover. And I hope he uses his newly healthy brain to reexamine his life and seriously consider what kind of person would deny the lifesaving healthcare access they enjoy to the very people who provide it for them.

Open Wide...