Here Lies My Anger

Last night on Twitter, the Resisterhood tweeted [moving GIF in link]: "Just watching the 'Hillary has nobody to blame but herself' hit pieces roll in from journalists who spent all of 2016 writing about emails."

I went off on one from there.


This is a central piece of the national gaslighting about which I wrote yesterday. We remember this happening. We understand that it matters. It is not immaterial that a female presidential candidate has been asked, over and over, why she isn't "likable," as if that is a universal fact. As if it doesn't invisibilize her millions of fervent supporters, who like her very much indeed.

As if many of those female supporters don't experience the same damn thing ourselves. Judged on our likability, our fuckability, our willingness to be "nice" in response to harm.

No one holds male candidates to this standard. Trump, now president, with historically low approval ratings, still does not get asked why he's not "likable."

No one asked Bernie Sanders whether he thought his irascible temperament might be a hindrance in a general election. Further to that, no one ever asked Sanders, or Trump, about his palpable antipathy toward Clinton. No one ever posed the question to either of them: "Why do you so obviously not like her?"

It was Hillary Clinton who was expected to answer why it was that people hated her, as though there is a politician alive who isn't hated by some people. And most of them for reasons more concrete and convincing than, "There's just something about her..."

It is not immaterial that Clinton has been publicly and repeatedly asked why people don't like her, why people don't trust her, and sundry variations. Those questions themselves create a narrative. Especially when they exist in a space in which she is never, ever, asked why it is that so many people love and admire her, why so many people are so loyal to her, why so many people see themselves in her.

And the reason why she is not asked those questions is because they aren't designed to shame her. Because they subvert the narrative that she is uniquely loathed.

Because those questions would have made it more difficult for people who undercut her campaign to blame her and excuse themselves.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of a red couch

Hosted by a red sofa. Have a seat and chat.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Suggested by Shaker carovee: "When/how did you learn about sex? I'm interested in generational changes in how people are taught sex ed."

Open Wide...

The Make-Up Thread

Here is your semi-regular make-up thread, to discuss all things make-up and make-up adjacent.

Do you have a make-up product you'd recommend? Are you looking for the perfect foundation which has remained frustratingly elusive? Need or want to offer make-up tips? Searching for hypoallergenic products? Want to grouse about how you hate make-up? Want to gush about how you love it?

Whatever you like—have at it!

* * *

My apologies for not having done a Make-Up Thread since—eek!—last August! I can't even remember the last time I wore make-up, so I haven't had anything to post. And still don't, really!

But, in make-up adjacent news, I recently purchased Lush's Eau Roma Water toner, and, although I've only used it a couple of times so far, I really like it a lot.

image of a container of Eau Roma Water, by Lush

I've never seen a toner in a spray before, and it's such a good idea! To be honest, I haven't even used the product long enough to know if it's making a meaningful difference for my skin, but it's so refreshing that I kind of don't even care, lol.

Anyway! What's up with you?

* * *

Please note, as always, that advice should be not be offered to an individual person unless they solicit it. Further: This thread is open to everyone—women, men, genderqueer folks. People who are make-up experts, and people who are make-up newbies. Also, because there is a lot of racist language used in discussions of make-up, and in make-up names, please be aware to avoid turns of phrase that are alienating to women of color, like "nude" or "flesh tone" when referring to a peachy or beige color. I realize some recommended products may have names that use these words, so please be considerate about content noting for white supremacist (and/or Orientalist) product naming.

Open Wide...

I Write Letters

Dear Assholes Who Tell Me to Focus on Donald Trump and Stop Talking About Hillary Clinton:

Shut. The fuck. Up.

Let me expand on that thought…

1. I am a grown-ass woman of 42 years old, who has been writing about politics and culture for 13 years. I am eminently capable of holding multiple thoughts in my head at once, multitasking, and prioritizing my time and energy as I see fit. I will focus on whatever I damn well want to focus on and you can keep your unsolicited opinions to yourself.

2. Just since the election, I have written over 350 pieces about Donald Trump, including a comprehensive daily compendium of Trump news, detailing as many news items about the Trump administration as I am able, every single day. I'm fairly certain you're not doing anywhere near that amount of work covering Donald Trump, so don't tell me that my focus on Trump is insufficient.

3. LOL at your lack of self-awareness. Hectoring strangers is time you could be spending focused on Trump.

4. I will never get over the election, for reasons I have already explained. But most of the writing I'm doing about Hillary Clinton now isn't about the election, per se. It's about the way the election is being remembered.

There is a gross national gaslighting happening, as the vast majority of election postmortems engage in a sickening erasure of Clinton's strengths, her supporters' enthusiasm, the incredible history that was made, the breathtaking misogyny that was unleashed against Clinton and her visible supporters, and the harassment that kept many of her supporters silent, replacing these realities with an insistence that she was a "shitty" candidate to neuter the grave import of Russian interference, James Comey's shocking unprofessionalism, and Donald Trump's cynical appeal to white supremacy.

We are being asked to ignore that the 2016 election was a referendum on how this nation values women, as we had a choice between a proudly feminist candidate and a confessed serial sex abuser, and instead to swallow bullshit revisionist trash about how Hillary Clinton ran a "doomed campaign."

We are being asked to forget that Trump oversaw rallies at which his supporters chanted "Lock her up!" and wore shirts bearing caricatures of Clinton exhorting violence and/or using rank misogynist epithets. And that Trump himself stood on stage beside her and called her a "nasty woman." That he accused her of playing the "woman card."

We are being asked to discount aggressive media bias, which resulted in billions of dollars of free advertising for Trump. And to discount that bigotry was the primary indicator of a vote for Trump among his supporters, while Clinton ran a campaign that centered diversity, garnering 94% of votes cast by Black women, who are the backbone of the Democratic Party.

We are being asked to agree that she was just a terrible, flawed candidate and a terrible, flawed human being, despite the fact that she won the popular vote, getting more votes than any white man in history.

And despite the fact that many of us see parts of ourselves in her.

That last one? It's a biggie. There are millions and millions of Hillary Clinton supporters—especially, though not exclusively, people from marginalized populations—who saw in her some piece of their own lives, who had maybe never seen that before in a presidential candidate.

Maybe it was her indomitable spirit, her persistence in overcoming obstacles set in her path by misogynist creeps; maybe it was her pragmatic progressivism; maybe it was the model she set balancing career and family; maybe it was her dorky humor; maybe it was her wonkiness; maybe it was her diplomatic finesse; maybe it was her tenacity; maybe it was the way she advocates for children; maybe it was her willingness to blaze a trail for women; maybe it was her courage; maybe it was some other part of her, or some combination of lots of these things.

Not everyone who supported Clinton saw pieces of themselves in her, but a whole goddamn lot of us did. And when we are asked to concede that her downfall is exclusively—or even primarily—attributable to her own catastrophic flaws, that being the most qualified candidate ever to run and making history and commandingly winning the popular vote don't matter, we are being asked to concede that we aren't good enough, either.

We are being asked to participate in gaslighting that is used against us all the time, with the express purpose of making marginalized people individually responsible for their own defeats.

So that we never have to look too carefully at institutional bigotries.

When you tell me to "move on," to "get over it," to stop focusing on Hillary Clinton, you are asking me to accept this national gaslighting; you are asking me to tacitly approve, with my silence, of the tactic of holding a woman personally responsible not just for her own failures, but also for everyone else's; of rewriting history in a way that ensures we are doomed to repeat it.

Not just against presidential candidates, but against all women (and other marginalized people), who are routinely held responsible for systemic bias.

You are thus asking me to participate in my own marginalization, and that is a request I will not accommodate.

No Love,
Liss

P.S. This, too.

Open Wide...

Holy Moly Trump Is Seriously Going to Kill Us All

Christopher P. Cavas at Defense News: Nothing to See Here: U.S. Carrier Still Thousands of Miles from Korea.

For more than a week, media reports in the U.S. and around Asia routinely have mentioned the approach of the aircraft carrier Carl Vinson's carrier strike group, seemingly implying an attack on North Korea could be imminent. But a week after the U.S. announced the carrier and its escorts would leave Singapore, forego port calls in Australia and instead return to Korean waters, the carrier and its group had yet to head north.

Rather, the ships were actually operating several hundred miles south of Singapore, taking part in scheduled exercises with Australian forces in the Indian Ocean.
The levels of incompetence, dishonesty, and flat-out bumblefuckery are astounding. And so is the media's continued willingness to give Trump a pass. The New York Times, for example, describes the situation as "a glitch-ridden sequence…which perpetuated the false narrative that an American armada was racing toward the waters off North Korea."


Oh, and about those "scheduled exercises" to which the aircraft carrier is headed. They've been routine for four decades.


That seems like something a president oughta know, before he goes shooting his mouth off about "sending a message" to a North Korean leader about whom Trump also knows absolutely nothing.
Trump also made two references in the interview to "this gentleman" in North Korea, who he said had "outplayed" both Presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama. The late North Korean ruler Kim Jong Il died in 2011. His son, Kim Jong Un, is the country's current ruler.
Trump is terrifyingly ignorant. And the media's insistence on treating him otherwise—breathlessly reporting on his military "strategy" as if it's an actual strategy and not a collection of incoherent comments made by a catastrophically ill-informed dipshit who regurgitates whatever half-baked conclusions he's drawn based on the last person he's talked to—is utterly appalling.

Treating Trump like he's got it together isn't going to make it so. He's a dangerous fucking mess, and papering over that global peril by minimizing his significant deficiencies and jerking off every time he drops a bomb is not helping.

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

Despite being 15 years old, Matilda still plays like she's a kitten. I got the cats a new toy recently, and she will play with it for an hour at a time. When I filmed this earlier today, she'd been going at it for a half hour already, lol.


[Video Description: Matilda the Fuzzy Sealpoint Cat lies on the floor of the dining room, playing with a circular toy with a jangly ball in it and a sproingy mouse on a stick on it. In the background, Sophie the Torbie Cat sits on a dining room chair, silently watching.]

Sophie and Olivia were the first to investigate when I put it on the floor...

image of Sophie the Torbie Cat and Olivia the White Farm Cat near the new toy

...and they definitely played with it, and still will occasionally, but Matilda is the ultimate toymaster.

image of Matilda the Fuzzy Sealpoint Cat lying on the floor beside the toy, staring at the mouse
"I will keel you, Sproingy Mouse!"

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 89

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Here are some things in the news today:

Keri Geiger and Michael Riley at Bloomberg: Blackwater Founder Erik Prince Said to Have Advised Trump Team. "In the very public, post-election parade of dignitaries, confidantes, and job-seekers filing in and out of Donald Trump's marquee Manhattan tower, Blackwater founder Erik Prince was largely out of sight. And yet Prince was very much a presence, providing advice to Trump's inner circle, including his top national security adviser, Michael T. Flynn, according to people familiar with his activities."

That would be the same Erik Prince who had a secret meeting in the Seychelles with "a Russian close to President Vladi­mir Putin as part of an apparent effort to establish a back-channel line of communication between Moscow and [then] President-elect Donald Trump." By way of reminder, he is also Education Secretary Betsy DeVos' brother.

David A. Fahrenthold and Jonathan O'Connell at the Washington Post: Two Plaintiffs Join Suit Against Trump, Alleging Breach of Emoluments Clause.
Two new plaintiffs — an association of restaurants and restaurant workers, and a woman who books banquet halls for two D.C. hotels — plan to join a lawsuit alleging that President Trump has violated the Constitution's emoluments clause because his hotels and restaurants do business with foreign governments.

The new plaintiffs will be added to the case on Tuesday morning, according to a spokesman for Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), a D.C.-based watchdog group.

CREW had originally filed suit against Trump in federal court in January, alleging that — by continuing to own his business, which rents out hotel rooms and meeting spaces to other governments — Trump had violated the constitutional provision that bans "emoluments" from foreign powers.

Legal experts had said that the case faced a serious hurdle: It wasn't clear that the watchdog group actually had standing to sue in the first place. What harm had it suffered, specifically, because of Trump's actions?

The new plaintiffs are intended to offer an alternative answer to that question. Both say that, as direct competitors of Trump's restaurants and hotels, they may lose foreign clients, who may book with Trump properties to curry favor with the president.

"It's damage to our members, both employers' bottom lines, and workers' loss of income and tips," said Saru Jayaraman, co-director of Restaurant Opportunities Centers United.
Emphasis mine. This is very smart, and also has the added benefit of being totally true. That little thing.

Speaking of the Trump family using the presidency to enrich themselves... Erika Kinetz and Anne D'Innocenzio at TPM: Ivanka Trump Cleared Hurdle for Chinese Trademarks Same Day She Dined with Xi Jinping. "On April 6, Ivanka Trump's company won provisional approval from the Chinese government for three new trademarks, giving it monopoly rights to sell Ivanka brand jewelry, bags, and spa services in the world's second-largest economy. That night, the first daughter and her husband, Jared Kushner, sat next to the president of China and his wife for a steak and Dover sole dinner at Mar-a-Lago." Welp.

David Smith at the Guardian: Donald Trump to Overhaul H-1B Visa Program That Admits Foreign Workers. "In a bid to court working class voters, Donald Trump will sign an executive order on Tuesday to revamp a temporary visa programme used to bring foreign workers to fill jobs in the US. The president will use a visit to a manufacturing company in Kenosha, Wisconsin, a crucial state he snatched from Hillary Clinton in the election, to promote his latest 'Buy America Hire America' offensive."

Hey, remember when I said that the Trump administration is sending a message "to people considering immigrating to the U.S. And that message is: Don't."? Yeah.

Sarah K. Burris at Raw Story: Trump Blames Obama for Allowing Violent MS-13 Gang to Form in the U.S.—Which Took Hold in the Early 2000s. The headline pretty much says it all, although I appreciate Burris' dry observation: "However, the new president's facts are lacking in accuracy." LOL indeed! The daily "Trump Blames Obama" Madlib is sure getting weird, y'all.

Speaking of weird...


That picture of Yuge Jesus hugging Deflating Trump is from a real post on Tiffany Trump's Facebook page, and is captioned: "Dear Lord, I pray in the Mighty name of Jesus, that you would give Donald J Trump wisdom and that you would protect him and fill him with Your Spirit and help him to withstand the fiery darts of the enemy." FIERY DARTS!

[Content Note: Rape culture] Lara Bazelon at Politico: The Landmark Sexual Assault Case You've Probably Never Heard Of. This is a real turd of an article, on which my friend Jess Luther has a succinct thread here. There are so many problems with it, I hardly know where to begin. But I will say this: The "rape accusations ruin men's lives" trope died when we elected a sexual predator president.

[CN: Violent homophobia] Andy Towle at Towleroad: UN Ambassador Nikki Haley: U.S. Will Not Ignore Plight of Gay Men in Chechnya. "We are against all forms of discrimination, including against people based on sexual orientation. When left unchecked, discrimination and human rights abuses can lead to destabilization and conflict." That would mean a lot more if it were coming from an administration that wasn't horrendously antagonistic toward marginalized people, including the LGBTQ community, and whose president wasn't a Putin puppet.

[CN: Nativism] Tina Vasquez at Rewire: Asylum Seekers Denied Day Before Supreme Court. "The U.S. Supreme Court, after more than a year of legal proceedings, has decided not to hear a case involving asylum-seeking mothers and children who may now be deported immediately." Seethe.

[CN: Racism] Kenrya Rankin at Colorlines: Jeff Sessions: Stop 'Handcuffing the Police Instead of the Criminals'. "In an essay published yesterday via USA Today, Sessions explained his policy for overseeing police departments, which he says needs to start with avoiding 'harmful federal intrusion into the daily work of local police.' Per The Washington Post's database, police have killed at least 136 people of color so far in 2017." Fume.

[CN: Nativism] Ingrid Melander and Philippe Wojazer at Reuters: 'I Will Protect You!' Le Pen Tells Voters Ahead of Presidential Election. "'I will protect you. My first measure as president will be to reinstate France's borders,' Le Pen said to wide applause and cheers from the crowd of about 5,000, prompting the National Front's (FN) traditional 'This is our home!' chant." Does that sound familiar? It should. Shiver.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

"Nothing prevents individuals from sharing their own tax information. The IRS stresses that audits of tax returns are based on the information contained on the taxpayer's return and the underlying tax law—nothing else. The audit process is handled by career, nonpartisan civil servants, and we have processes in place to safeguard the exam process."—The IRS, in [video may autoplay at link] a statement to ABC News.

This is the IRS saying plainly that Donald Trump has no legal reason not to release his tax returns because of an audit.

In other words, this is the IRS very politely calling the president a damn liar.

Open Wide...

The New York Times Still Hates Hillary

So, there's a new book entitled Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton's Doomed Campaign, about how the first woman to ever win a major-party nomination for the presidency and her historically diverse staff, whose campaign won the popular vote by 3 million votes, are a bunch of dum-dum fuck-ups.

I'm paraphrasing, presumably, as I haven't read the book. I have, however, read the New York Times' review, penned by Michiko Kakutani, which is headlined: "'Shattered' Charts Hillary Clinton's Course Into the Iceberg." Cool.

In fact, the portrait of the Clinton campaign that emerges from these pages is that of a Titanic-like disaster: an epic fail made up of a series of perverse and often avoidable missteps by an out-of-touch candidate and her strife-ridden staff that turned "a winnable race" into "another iceberg-seeking campaign ship."
It is not until the sixth paragraph that Kakutani acknowledges maybe it wasn't entirely Team Clinton's fault, before immediately pivoting back to blaming Clinton:
There was a perfect storm of other factors, of course, that contributed to Clinton's loss, including Russian meddling in the election to help elect Trump; the controversial decision by the F.B.I. director, James Comey, to send a letter to Congress about Clinton's emails less than two weeks before Election Day; and the global wave of populist discontent with the status quo (signaled earlier in the year by the British "Brexit" vote) that helped fuel the rise of both Trump and Bernie Sanders. In a recent interview, Clinton added that she believed "misogyny played a role" in her loss.

The authors of "Shattered," however, write that even some of her close friends and advisers think that Clinton "bears the blame for her defeat"...
Note that Kakutani's perfunctory list of "other factors" does not include a political press that was unrelentingly unfair and often straight-up cruel to her, a dynamic in which the Times was a repeat offender, reaching their nadir in August with a 900+ word piece engaging body language experts to declare Clinton inauthentic because of a hand gesture people quickly noted she'd been using for decades.

It wasn't just that the Times engaged in the ubiquitous over-coverage of Clinton's emails—although they certainly did that, too—but that they published numerous articles making unjustifiable personal attacks on Clinton. And now, in reviewing a book about her "doomed campaign," their reviewer does not see fit to reflect on how their indefensible coverage may have played a part.

Not just during this campaign, but for years.

As my pal Jamison Foser noted on Twitter, the Washington Post's review of Shattered, by Steven Ginsberg, strikes a different tone. Ginsberg wonders: "In Wisconsin, she didn't show up enough. In Michigan, local organizers thought it was best that she stayed away. In Pennsylvania, she campaigned as aggressively as anywhere in the nation. In all three, she lost by less than 1 percent of the vote. So what should she have done?"

He also observes: "Does it really matter who was pissy at whom in Brooklyn when we still don't know what role the Russians played in the election or why FBI Director James Comey publicly announced a reopening of the email investigation in late October? Those questions are largely left unexplored here, other than as targets of Clinton's post-election ire."

So, Ginsberg certainly does a better job, but even he fails to raise the specter of what role the media played in "dooming" Clinton's presidential bid.

The Clinton campaign surely made mistakes, as every campaign does. Had she won the Electoral College and thus the presidency, we wouldn't be talking about them. We would be talking about the many things they did right—which are still commendable despite the fact that she lost.

And, yes, it's important to reflect on what could have been done differently. Although, as Ginsberg noted, that's no easy question to answer, given the narrow margin of losses in states across which a singular strategy wasn't employed.

But ultimately, resting the blame fully at Clinton's feet, even with some begrudging caveats about Russia and Comey, leaves out the most important factor: The tens of millions of people who voted for Donald Trump, despite his being a historically unfit candidate and a terrible wreck of a human being.

And the millions more who did not vote for Trump, but couldn't bring themselves to vote for Clinton, mostly for reasons based on demonstrable lies about her or owing to some vague unease, just "something about her" on which they couldn't quite put their fingers.

Or, as many people are eager to share, because she's a fucking bitch.

If you're going to blame Hillary Clinton primarily for her defeat, you'd better have a good suggestion for what she was supposed to do about that. And it sure as hell has to be better than: "In a recent interview, Clinton added that she believed 'misogyny played a role' in her loss."

The New York Times (among other outlets, none of which are "the paper of record") suggests that Clinton is to blame, while failing utterly to explore what it was motivated so many people to hate her with a viciousness we rarely see directed at candidates who are simultaneously accused of failing to be sufficiently radical.

To the absolute contrary, the Times only engages with Trump voters in order to keep doing garbage profiles of them, valorizing them even after they've won, while Clinton supporters were disappeared during the election beneath a metric fuckton of mendacity about the "low enthusiasm" which allegedly plagued her campaign. (Nope.)

Even now, the same disparities as seen in the campaign coverage persist. And how the media treats people who supported Clinton vs. how they treat people who did not is another major factor that same media curiously (ahem) refuses to explore.

There is ever only so much in any one candidate's control. That is true for every candidate. But the proportion of things outwith Hillary Clinton's control was significantly larger than for the average candidate. That's what made the difference.

And anyone writing a postmortem who doesn't reckon with that fact isn't writing something worth reading.

Open Wide...

Donald Trump Is Terrible: An Ongoing Series

Today, there is a "jungle-style" (all-party) Congressional primary in Georgia, in which the Democrats are aiming for an upset. If you haven't been following the goings-on, ABC News has [video may autoplay] a good summary.

Last night, Donald Trump tweeted:


Setting aside the fact that his typically atrocious grammar suggests "lower safety," which he clearly didn't mean...


What he almost certainly meant to convey is that the Republican Party keeps people safe better than the Democratic Party, and not the more sinister potential interpretation, which is that people who don't vote Republican risk their personal safety under his regime.

But even the former, more generous interpretation is bad enough.

Candidates make this sort of argument all the time: My party is the party that will best protect you. But the president occupies a different role. Different, even, than presidential candidates. Because the office itself demands different behavior.

Trump doesn't care. His ruthless partisanship and talk of his "enemies" from his Twitter platform is incredibly inappropriate. It is divisive, and hastens the erosion of anything resembling national unity. Which, ironically, makes us less safe.

Like everything else he does.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

Hosted by a turquoise sofa. Have a seat and chat.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Suggested by Shaker aforalpha: "If you got to design a postage stamp, who or what would you put on it?"

Open Wide...

The Monday Blogaround

This blogaround brought to you by space.

Recommended Reading:

Happy FIFTEENTH Blogiversary to Atrios! Wow!

Shay et. al.: [Content Note: White privilege] What Is the Role of White People in Racial Justice?

Keith: [CN: Sexual assault; carcerality] New York Women's Prison Reclaimed by Former Inhabitants

Your Fat Friend: [CN: Fat hatred] To Body Positive Friends Who Don't Wear Plus Sizes

Digby: Maxine Waters, Donald Trump, and Impeachment

Andrea: [CN: Domestic violence] Don't Worry Everyone, Paul Qui Is Redeemed—Again!

Rae: [CN: Moving GIF at link; images of creepy creatures] Ten Horrifying Deep Sea Creatures, Ranked

Leave your links and recommendations in comments. Self-promotion welcome and encouraged!

Open Wide...

Discussion Thread: Good Things

One of the ways we resist the demoralization and despair in which exploiters of fear like Trump thrive is to keep talking about the good things in our lives.

Because, even though it feels very much (and rightly so) like we are losing so many things we value, there are still daily moments of joy or achievement or love or empowering ferocity or other kinds of fulfillment.

Maybe you've experienced something big worth celebrating; maybe you've just had a precious moment of contentment; maybe getting out of bed this morning was a success worthy of mention.

News items worth celebrating are also welcome.

So, whatever you have to share that's good, here's a place to do it.

* * *

Here are seven random pix of some good things from my week off, for those who would like to see them...

image of small white jellyfish
Tiny jellyfish, floating. I posted video of the larger jellies here.

image of seahorses, two of whom are holding each other's tails
Seahorses, holding each other's tails.

image of a stingray
A stingray, who followed me and acted like a total clown, to get my attention.

image of light at dusk falling across the open closet door of my bedroom
View from my bed at dusk, after post-closet organization collapse.

image of a bright moon through clouds
The most beautiful moon.

image of the tips of hostas poking up through the dirt in my garden
Hostas emerging from the earth in my garden, looking like wee purple mountains.

image of my feet resting on the arm of Deeky's sofa
Kicking back with my feet up at Deeks' house.

Open Wide...

Stoppppppppppppppppp


This tweet was in response to a New York Times piece headlined "Trump Voters in a Swing District Wonder When the 'Winning' Will Start."

It follows an AP piece from two days ago headlined: "Trump's Voters Can Be Very Forgiving—Up to a Point."

And a Politico piece from four days ago headlined: "Trump's base turns on him."

And an endless number of similar pieces coming at one- or two-day intervals every day since before Inauguration Day.

(I'm not going to link to them directly. You can find them, if you are so inclined.)

I cannot tolerate one fucking more of these garbage pieces. How many Trump voter thinkpieces can one galaxy even contain?! They are beyond worthless: They more deeply entrench the narrative that Trump voters are the Real Americans to whom we need to be listening, while simultaneously engaging in the erasure of red-state progressives who inhabit the same spaces, and are often more radical than blue-state counterparts, because life outside blue enclaves demands it.

I don't need to be admonished to empathize with Trump voters, nor do I have anything to learn from these folks.


The only takeaway from the relentless compulsion to publish these piece of shit articles is that the political press still hasn't learned its lesson from the election.

Open Wide...

The Mar-a-Lago Problem

[Content Note: Bullying.]

Donald Trump has already spent an enormous amount of his presidency at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida. In fact, per NBC News, he "has spent seven of 13 weekends at his Palm Beach, Florida estate. According to NBC News' estimates, by Sunday Trump will have spent 28 percent of his term traveling to or staying at Mar-a-Lago."

Each trip costs taxpayers between $1 million and $3 million. Which doesn't even account for local costs: "The cost of Trump's summit with President Xi hit hard on a local level, with the Palm Beach County community footing the bill, an estimated $1.5 million for Thursday and Friday's U.S.-China summit. Palm Beach County Sheriff Ric Bradshaw told NBC that each day [Donald] Trump spends in Mar-a-Lago costs his department $60,000."

And the costs are only one piece of the enormous Mar-a-Lago problem.

The estate was reportedly put into the trust, which ethics experts have resoundingly condemned as insufficient to address the many ethics issues arising from Trump's business holdings. As but one example of said insufficiency, Trump knows, because we all know, that membership prices have been raised. NBC notes: "Since Trump became president the cost of membership at Mar-a-Lago has doubled, with guests now paying $200,000 just to join."

Further, because Trump continues his routine visits to Mar-a-Lago, people wealthy enough to afford the exorbitant membership know they are buying access to the president. Trump has openly discussed national business with guests, and has casually discussed national security issues with foreign leaders in front of guests. Because Mar-a-Lago does not keep visitor logs, there is no telling who has gotten access to Trump and his indiscreet conversations, making Mar-a-Lago what security experts call "heaven for spies."

We have very little transparency on which members of the administration are with Trump at Mar-a-Lago at any given time, nor into how he makes enormous national security decisions while he is there.

Visiting foreign dignitaries are obliged to meet with Trump at Mar-a-Lago, and stay at the estate, despite the fact that Trump is alleged to have eavesdropped on staff and guests, and is alleged to have assaulted women there.

And then there is this: In a profile of Eric Trump in the Independent, he says the following of his dad's trips to Mar-a-Lago:

While on the subject of golf, I raise the fact that his father has been criticised in recent days for playing 16 times since his inauguration. Eric says his father uses the game to de-stress but there is also another good reason for it—professional bonding.

"You can sit with somebody in a golf cart where there might be cultural differences and language barriers and have a good time and build a friendship in a way that you could never do sitting across an office table from someone—and I think being able to go to Mar-a-Lago [Trump's Florida estate], it is my father's Crawford, Texas."

He explains: "Crawford was George W Bush's ranch and Bush brought foreign leaders from all over the world [there]. He would go down to the ranch and they would drive a truck around and they would have fun and they would eat and that was his way of bonding.

"Mar-a-Lago is an amazing estate that has been a very effective tool for [my father] to go down and get to know somebody while not sitting—no different to you wanting to sit next to me on this couch today—not sitting across a wooden partition, which instantly makes a relationship more strenuous."

He explains: "If he can befriend people and find common respect, common ground and friendship—if you can have a good time together—then you are always going to see somebody in a very different light than you would with this kind of a relationship [he points to the wooden table] or a relationship over the phone, and that's an immensely powerful tool."
A most cynical spin. What Eric Trump is actually describing is a strategy of manipulative bullies, who always want people on their turf, so that they have the upper hand.

The White House belongs to the people. It does not belong to Donald Trump. He is its current occupant, but it is not his home. And that matters, when foreign heads of state come to meet with the U.S. President. When they visit the White House, they are visiting a state-owned property, only part of which is a temporary residence for the current president.

Mar-a-Lago is fundamentally different. It is Trump's place, not the people's place.

And, yes, that is indeed very much like Bush's Crawford ranch (although Bush hardly used Crawford to the extent Trump uses Mar-a-Lago). The thing is, Bush was a bully, too.

I object to the cost of Trump's excursions to Mar-a-Lago, and I object to the lack of transparency and carelessness of access during those visits. But above all else, I object mightily to the U.S. President using his private estate to give himself a "home court advantage" when engaging in what is meant to be good faith diplomacy with global leaders.

That he obliges them to come to his private estate subverts good faith diplomacy right from the start, and that leaves our country less respected and leaves all of us less safe.

This is not how I want the U.S. President doing business in our names. Nor where.

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

Happy Doggehs at Uncle Deeky's house over the weekend!

Ear Pose One:

image of Dudley the Greyhound and Zelda the Black and Tan Mutt standing on Deeky's deck, grinning

Ear Pose Two:

image of Dudley the Greyhound and Zelda the Black and Tan Mutt standing on Deeky's deck, grinning, their ears now in different positions

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 88

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Here are some things in the news today:

Anna Fifield at the Washington Post: Pence Tells North Korea Not to Test American Resolve, Offering Syria and Afghanistan Strikes as Examples. "Vice President Pence warned North Korea on Monday not to test U.S. military might by pursuing its nuclear weapons program, citing recent strikes in Syria and Afghanistan as proof of American 'strength and resolve.' The stark warning, delivered in Seoul after the vice president went to the military demarcation line that separates the two Koreas, could revive speculation that the White House is considering military action against the regime in Pyongyang. Pence said the Trump administration wants to persuade North Korea to abandon its nuclear weapons 'through peaceful means,' but he repeated the administration's warning that 'all options are on the table.'"

Sarah Kendzior at the Globe and Mail: Trump Craves Praise. We Praise Him for Bombings. What Possibly Could Go Wrong? "When the media cheers Mr. Trump's bombing, seemingly forgetting the policy failures that preceded those explosions, we're all in danger. He is a man who craves praise—and if he receives it through brute force, he'll keep doing it. ...Mr. Trump does have a doctrine, but it is not about Syria: it's about Trump. The Trump Doctrine should alarm you not only because of what it means for the Syrian conflict, but because of how it will be applied to other countries—in particular, nuclear adversary North Korea."

The Japan News/Yomiuri via the Salt Lake Tribune: China, Russia Send Ships After U.S. Aircraft Carrier. "China and Russia have dispatched intelligence-gathering vessels from their navies to chase the USS Carl Vinson nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, which is heading toward waters near the Korean Peninsula, multiple sources of the Japanese government revealed to The Yomiuri Shimbun. It appears that both countries aim to probe the movements of the United States, which is showing a stance of not excluding military action against North Korea. The Self-Defense Forces are strengthening warning and surveillance activities in the waters and airspace around the area, according to the sources."

[Content Note: Video may autoplay at link] David E. Sanger and William J. Broad at the New York Times: A 'Cuban Missile Crisis in Slow Motion' in North Korea. "[T]he current standoff has grown only more volatile. It pits a new president's vow never to allow North Korea to put American cities at risk—'It won’t happen!' he said on Twitter on Jan. 2—against a young, insecure North Korean leader who sees that capability as his only guarantee of survival. Mr. Trump is clearly new to this kind of dynamic, as he implicitly acknowledged when he volunteered that Xi Jinping, China's president, had given him what amounted to a compressed seminar in Chinese-North Korean relations. He emerged surprised that Beijing did not have the kind of absolute control over its impoverished neighbor that he insisted it did last year. 'After listening for 10 minutes, I realized it's not so easy,' he said. 'It's not what you would think.'"


* * *

[Content Note: Violence; homophobia; threats] Adam Taylor at the Washington Post: She Broke the Story of Chechnya's Anti-Gay Purge; Now, She Says She Has to Flee Russia.
In March, [Elena Milashina, a reporter for the Russian newspaper Novaya Gazeta] had discovered evidence that gay men were being detained, tortured and even killed in an anti-homosexual purge in Chechnya.

After spending weeks checking the story with her sources, Milashina says they could confirm that hundreds of people had been detained; at least three are now thought to have died.

Despite corroborating evidence from nongovernmental organizations and Western publications, Chechen authorities have dismissed the allegations out of hand—not because the violence is wrong, but because they say gays do not exist in Chechnya.

...[Milashina has now] fled her home in Moscow because of threats. ..."Not just me, but all the people working at the newspaper are now in danger, because this was a clear jihad message. We will persecute you for tarnishing the honor of the Chechen nation, this nasty thing that you said. There are gays among Chechen people? We will persecute you until the last person at Novaya Gazeta dies. It's unbelievable."
At the link, there is an interview with Milashina, about the threats she and her colleagues are facing, as well as the Kremlin's refusal to do anything to stop the violence against the LGBT community they have documented or the resulting threats against them.

* * *

Brooke Seipel at the Hill: Trump White House Officials Work Their Way Around Ethics Rules. "The Trump administration has secretly issued waivers to some officials who may have violated ethics rules, the New York Times reported Saturday. The Times, in collaboration with ProPublica, reported that after analyzing reports from lobbyists and interviews with ethics officials, it appears that at least two of Trump's appointees in the White House may have violated ethics rules. However, the newspaper said it is nearly impossible to determine the details of such violations, as the administration is reportedly issuing secret waivers to the rules."

Merrit Kennedy at NPR: White House Says It Will No Longer Release Visitor Logs to the Public. "The Trump administration says it will not make public the names of those visiting the White House, reversing the Obama administration's policy. White House communications director Michael Dubke said in a statement that the decision was due to the 'the grave national security risks and privacy concerns of the hundreds of thousands of visitors annually,' NPR's Scott Horsley reports. ...Watchdog groups immediately criticized the decision, with Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington calling it a 'massive step away from transparency.'"

Jonathan D. Salant at Towleroad: Trump Asks Garrett to Lead Agency the Ex-N.J. Congressman Wanted to Kill. "Donald Trump on Friday nominated ex-Rep. Scott Garrett to become president of the Export-Import Bank, an agency the former lawmaker once called 'the epitome of crony capitalism.' ...Like Garrett, a founding member of the House Freedom Caucus of conservative lawmakers, Trump opposed the Export-Import Bank during the campaign. But he told the Wall Street Journal earlier in the week that he would support the bank. Among the biggest beneficiaries of the bank is Boeing Co., which contributed $1 million to Trump's inauguration."

Gallup: Majority in U.S. No Longer Thinks Trump Keeps His Promises. "Donald Trump's image among Americans as someone who keeps his promises has faded in the first two months of his presidency, falling from 62% in February to 45%. The public is also less likely to see him as a 'strong and decisive leader,' as someone who 'can bring about the changes this country needs.' or as 'honest and trustworthy.'" Huh!

Kyle Griffin of MSNBC: "Paul Manafort reportedly advising a Chinese tycoon on how to win contracts for Trump infrastructure plans." That seems fine.

And finally: A couple of snapshots from the resistance.

Tina Vasquez at Rewire: 'Donald Trump, We Can't Be Living Like This': Youth Rally for Immigrants' Rights. "In the name of 'Black and brown solidarity,' children of color with different relationships to the U.S. immigration system gathered Wednesday in front of the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction to ask President Donald Trump and North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper (D) to stop separating their families and communities. Part of We Belong Together's Kids Caravan, a four-city tour from April 10 to April 13, the action highlighted experiences of youth of color who have had parents detained, deported, or targeted by the immigration system. The tour ends today in Washington, D.C., leading to a week of action in which advocates will ask elected leaders to speak out against policies that threaten immigrant communities."

Kenrya Rankin at Colorlines: Death Penalty Abolitionists Rally to Stop Arkansas Executions. "On Monday (April 17), Arkansas Governor Asa Hutchinson is scheduled to execute the first of seven people over the course of 11 days in an attempt to beat the expiration clock on a batch of midazolam, one of the drugs the state needs for lethal injections. ...Arkansas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty, American Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas, Murder Victims' Families for Reconciliation and other partners led a rally in opposition to the executions, and delivered more than 154,000 petition signatures to the state capitol, each of them asking the governor not to move forward."

Perry Stein at the Washington Post: The Tax March: Protesters Around the Country Call on Trump to Release His Taxes. "From Seattle to the District, protesters gathered in cities throughout the country Saturday calling on Trump to release his personal tax returns as part of a nationwide Tax March. ...In all, dozens of protests occurred throughout the country. The main march unfolded in the nation's capital, where protesters gathered for a rally in front of the Capitol and then marched west along Pennsylvania Avenue. In South Florida, activists marched to Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort, where the president is staying this weekend. Thousands more gathered at a large march in New York City, where activists, comedians and a state senator spoke. ...During the march in the District, the lineup of speakers included Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), and Rep. Jamie B. Raskin (D-Md.) and others. The speakers derided the president, and called on him to act ethically and read the Constitution."

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

"The clock is being turned back. Vulnerable populations are under relentless attack by this administration. This is a war, and that is not hyperbole or exaggeration."—The New York Times' Charles M. Blow, in his latest must-read column, "100 Days of Horror."

That Trump would ever be "a friend" to marginalized people was always a damnable lie. And you know who always knew that? His voters. That's why they voted for him.

Open Wide...