This Is Appalling

[Content Note: Eliminationism; stalking; harassment.]

I am, frankly, a little reluctant to write about and link this, for reasons that will become obvious, but I believe it's important to push back hard on it.

Anti-Hillary voters—I am reluctant to say Bernie Sanders supporters, although that is the logical conclusion, given that they are the only two Democratic candidates left in the race—have put together a website called the "Superdelegate Hit List," in which they urge people to find and contact Democratic superdelegates to, presumably, coerce them into doing their bidding.

screen cap of the top of the Superdelegate Hit List page featuring a logo of a donkey with arrows crossed through it and text reading: 'SUPERDELEGATE HIT LIST: It's time we take our democracy back from the DNC. Together we can find the Superdelegates and hold them accountable to our votes.' There are also buttons labeled 'Submit Data' and 'Find Delegates.'

This is just straight-up eliminationist language and the encouragement of stalking and harassment of superdelegates supporting Clinton.

Lest you imagine it's not explicitly targeting Clinton, here's what you see as you scroll down the page:

screen cap of the middle of the page featuring a background image of Clinton with her hands up, her H with an arrow logo turned sideways to convey 'down with Hillary,' and the text: 'THE CLINTONS HAVE A 'HIT LIST' AND NOW WE DO TOO!'

Clinton with her hands raised, and her logo turned sideways to convey "Down with Hillary." Plus a regurgitation of the thoroughly discredited conspiracy theory about the Clintons having a "hit list."

In anticipation of criticisms about their eliminationist imagery and language, the creators of this site include this "hilarious" disclaimer at the bottom of the page:

screen cap of the bottom of the page featuring text reading: 'DISCLAMER: THIS SITE DOES NOT CONDONE SHOOTING DONKEYS WEARING TIES WITH ARROWS.'

Right. But it does condone the doxxing, stalking, and harassment of superdelegates. Clicking on the "Find Delegates" button prominently displayed at the top of the page leads to a "Master Hit List" spreadsheet, detailing the names and contact information of superdelegates—including, in some cases, home addresses.

This is absolutely indecent, abusive, and dangerous. It is anathema to open and free democracy.

And, given that it very specifically targets Hillary Clinton, I certainly expect Bernie Sanders to loudly and unequivocally condemn it. Immediately.

Open Wide...

Koch Brother Pulling for Paul Ryan

We started out the Republican primary with seventeen candidates. Sevenfuckingteen. Slowly, the clowncarishly enormous field was whittled down to the three dirtbags left standing: Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, and John Kasich.

Trump, who is simply too forthright in communicating the grotesquery of Republican policies for the delicate constitutions of Republican elites, is winning by a country mile, to the consternation of buttoned-up conservatives like Mitt Romney, who prefer their platform of rank bigotry to be conveyed via dogwhistles and Orwellian newspeak.

And so this ridiculous primary continues to be ever more absurd, with not-so-secret discussions taking place among GOP leaders and donors about the possibility of a brokered convention, in which even Trump doesn't win enough delegates to win straight-out, and how they might exploit a contested convention in order to slide in some goofball who hasn't even been running as the party's nominee.

The latest: "Charles Koch Is Privately Committed to Getting Paul Ryan Nominated in Cleveland."

Of course. Which Koch denies. Because this is an obvious trial balloon, responding to Ryan's insistence that he would never even consider it unless the party united behind the idea. Is everyone uniting?! Are they uniting yet?!

They are not uniting. Trump's supporters are never going to unite behind anyone who they view as "stealing" the nomination from him.

It's neat how Republican voters suddenly care about voter disenfranchisement when its their votes the Republican Party is treating like dogshit.

Anyway.

Good luck with your nomination, Republicans. Have fun with your roosting chickens! Whichever appalling nightmare you decide to run, I will dedicate the next half year of my life to defeating them!

Open Wide...

Today in Terrible Trumpery

Donald Trump is about as unpresidential as it is possible for a human being to be. And he's going to keep on being unpresidential, because if he were presidential, it would be "boring as hell."

"I can be presidential, but if I was presidential I would only have — about 20 percent of you would be here because it would be boring as hell, I will say," Trump told supporters during a rally in Superior, Wisconsin.

The New York billionaire asked the crowd if he could be "unpresidential" a bit longer and warned that he may be "a little bit unpresidential" in a general election fight against Hillary Clinton.

"We'll beat Hillary so bad," he boasted. "Don't forget, I haven't started on Hillary yet. I haven't focused on Hillary yet."
You do that, Trump. You come at Hillary with your unboring unpresidentiality, and we'll see how that works out for ya.

* * *

[Content Note: Racism] In other Terrible Trumpery news, a new Quinnipiac poll has found that 85% of Trump supporters strongly or somewhat agree that "America has lost its identity"; 91% strongly or somewhat agree that "I feel as though my beliefs and values are under attack in America these days"; and 80% strongly or somewhat agree that "The government has gone too far in assisting minority groups."

That's basically the exact recipe of aggrieved white supremacists. Nice base of support you've got there, Trump.

* * *

Meanwhile: "Trump reveals how he would force Mexico to pay for border wall."
Donald Trump says he will force Mexico to pay for a border wall as president by threatening to cut off the flow of billions of dollars in payments that immigrants send home to the country, an idea that could decimate the Mexican economy and set up an unprecedented showdown between the United States and a key diplomatic ally.
This is not only an absurd and untenable idea, but it would almost certainly cause a major international incident with our closest ally. This guy is a terrifying disaster.

* * *

And at Politico this morning: "Inside Trump's 'privatized mercenary force': The security team that patrols the billionaire's rallies has a history of rough tactics, allegations of profiling."
A POLITICO investigation revealed that Trump has assembled a privately funded security and intelligence force with a far wider reach than other campaigns' private security operations: tracking and rooting out protesters, patrolling campaign events, and supplementing the Secret Service protection of the billionaire real estate showman during his nontraditional campaign for the GOP presidential nomination.

The investigation ― which utilized Federal Election Commission reports, state licensing records, court filings and interview accounts or testimony from more than a dozen people who've crossed paths with Trump's security ― found that the tactics of Trump's team at times inflamed the already high tensions around his divisive campaign, rather than defusing them.
Of course they did.

* * *

[CN: Video may autoplay at link] Trump says John Kasich shouldn't be allowed to continue running: "Kasich shouldn't be allowed to run. Honestly, Kasich should not be allowed to run. He hurts Trump much more than he hurts Cruz. Kasich shouldn't be allowed to continue, and the RNC shouldn't allow him to continue." Good grief.
The businessman said he brought up the issue during his meeting with Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus last week.

"I said, 'Why is a guy allowed to run? All he's doing is he goes from place to place, and loses and he keeps running,'" Trump said. "He doesn't have to run and take my votes. Because he's taking my votes. He's not taking Cruz's votes."
Trump thinks he owns votes. Someone should write an article about how entitled he is!

* * *

[CN: Misogyny] Yet again, Trump is trotting out his wife to tell everyone that he's not a misogynist: "'No matter who you are, a man or a woman, he treats everyone equal,' said Mrs. Trump, who spoke for just over a minute and read from notes, praising her husband as 'a great communicator,' 'a great negotiator,' and 'a great leader.'" Case closed, Your Honor!

Open Wide...

NOPE

[Content Note: Regionalism; racism.]

Yesterday afternoon, Bernie Sanders surrogate and actor Tim Robbins introduced Sanders at an event in Green Bay, Wisconsin, and had this to say: "After the Southern primaries, you had called the election. But who's fooling who? Winning South Carolina in a Democratic primary is about as significant as winning Guam. [audience laughter] No Democrat is going to win in South Carolina in the general election. Why do these victories have so much significance?"

Oh, I don't know, Tim. Maybe because South Carolina's population isn't disproportionately white? Maybe because the Democratic Party means more to lots of progressive in Red States for lots of reasons? Maybe because the voters in a state like South Carolina look a lot like the Obama Coalition, which has delivered the last two presidential elections for the Democrats?

And, by the way, Guam ain't a fucking punchline, asshole. Guam matters, too.

People like Tim Robbins really need to venture outside of their liberal enclaves occasionally. It is embarrassing for them that they have not the faintest understanding that some of the most dedicated progressives live in red states.

As I have said many times before, the thing about being a progressive in any of the states that "no Democrat is going to win" in a presidential election is that extreme reactionary conservatism tends to create radical progressives.

It's no coincidence that reddy-red-red Indiana (except when it goes blue, ahem) has produced the likes of Kurt Vonnegut and Eugene Debs. Not to mention yours truly.

This is the kind of statement that "flyover" progressives don't forget.

In case you're wondering what Sanders has to say about his numerous celebrity surrogates saying shitty things lately, Jake Tapper asked him about that during the same interview I mentioned here. That was before Robbins' comment, and Tapper was specifically asking about Rosario Dawson's trash-talking Hillary Clinton, but here's what Sanders replied:

Hey, Jake, Jake, we have dozens of surrogates, and Rosario is doing a great job for us. She was with me in the South Bronx when we had 18,000 people coming out to start our campaign in New York.

We have many, many surrogates who say many, many things. Many of these surrogates do not agree with everything I say. And I do not agree with every approach and everything that they say. And that's the simple reality.
Oh.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of a pineapple

Hosted by pineapple.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Suggested by Shaker Wonder: "What would you do with a million dollars (or equivalent cash in your location)?"

Open Wide...

Holy Mackerel

The New York Daily News just published the complete transcript of its Editorial Board's meeting with Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, and it is honestly stunning. There is a lot to talk about in this interview, but I'll just hit three of the things that really stuck out to me.

1. When he's pressed for details on his oft-mentioned proposal to break up the banks, his lack of knowledge about how this would actually be accomplished is stunning.

Daily News: Okay. Well, let's assume that you're correct on that point [that the banks have too much power and need to be disempowered]. How do you go about doing it?

Sanders: How you go about doing it is having legislation passed, or giving the authority to the secretary of treasury to determine, under Dodd-Frank, that these banks are a danger to the economy over the problem of too-big-to-fail.

Daily News: But do you think that the Fed, now, has that authority?

Sanders: Well, I don't know if the Fed has it. But I think the administration can have it.

Daily News: How? How does a President turn to JPMorgan Chase, or have the Treasury turn to any of those banks and say, "Now you must do X, Y, and Z?"

Sanders: Well, you do have authority under the Dodd-Frank legislation to do that, make that determination.

Daily News: You do, just by Federal Reserve fiat, you do?

Sanders: Yeah. Well, I believe you do.

Daily News: So if you look forward, a year, maybe two years, right now you have... JPMorgan has 241,000 employees. About 20,000 of them in New York. $192 billion in net assets. What happens? What do you foresee? What is JPMorgan in year two of...

Sanders: What I foresee is a stronger national economy. And, in fact, a stronger economy in New York State, as well. What I foresee is a financial system which actually makes affordable loans to small and medium-size businesses. Does not live as an island onto themselves concerned about their own profits. And, in fact, creating incredibly complicated financial tools, which have led us into the worst economic recession in the modern history of the United States.

Daily News: I get that point. I'm just looking at the method because, actions have reactions, right? There are pluses and minuses. So, if you push here, you may get an unintended consequence that you don't understand. So, what I'm asking is, how can we understand? If you look at JPMorgan just as an example, or you can do Citibank, or Bank of America. What would it be? What would that institution be? Would there be a consumer bank? Where would the investing go?

Sanders: I'm not running JPMorgan Chase or Citibank.

Daily News: No. But you'd be breaking it up.

Sanders: That's right. And that is their decision as to what they want to do and how they want to reconfigure themselves. That's not my decision.

[...]

Daily News: Okay. You saw, I guess, what happened with Metropolitan Life. There was an attempt to bring them under the financial regulatory scheme, and the court said no. And what does that presage for your program?

Sanders: It's something I have not studied, honestly, the legal implications of that.
For much of Sanders' campaign, his critics (myself included) have been asking for details about how, exactly, he's going to accomplish many of the things he wants to do, including breaking up the banks in a way that does not cause a reverberating financial catastrophe. Finally obliged to answer that question, he literally provides nothing but vague suggestions about how it might be accomplished, followed by the breathtaking confession that he has never studied the legal implications of a key case study in precisely the reform he's proposing.

2. Despite having straight-up called his "establishment" line of attacks on Clinton a character assault, he incredulously makes that very line of attack on her again, only to then claim he's not assaulting her character:
Sanders: Look, I will not shock anybody in this room in suggesting what everybody in America knows, that Hillary Clinton is the candidate of the Democratic establishment. Alright, you don't get $15 million from Wall Street by accident. She is an establishment candidate. To my point of view, the terms of her issues and views are far, far preferable to any of the Republican candidates. But I think what she has basically said is, not to expect bold change from her. She talks about incremental change. I think that's a fair statement, is it not?

Alright, I believe that in the midst of the kinds of crises that we face with a disappearing middle class and massive levels of income and wealth inequality, the only major country on earth not guarantee to healthcare to all people, only major country not to provide paid family and medical leave, it is time to get beyond establishment politics. So to put your question in maybe a simpler way, is she a candidate of the establishment? The answer is, of course she is. That does not make her an evil person. I'm not judging her character…

Daily News: I wasn't suggesting that.

Sanders: I know that. But that's all.
Geez, she's just a devil-horned minion of the institutions that are destroying the country, but it's not like I'm judging her character. HOW DARE YOU EVEN SUGGEST IT?!

Again, he wants it both ways. He wants to say the establishment is evil and that Clinton is "an establishment candidate," but then absurdly claim that she's not an evil person and that he's not judging her character. And, weirdly, trying to have it both ways means that he's essentially robbing her of her agency. Because the only way to simultaneously call the establishment of which she's a representative destructive but not call her destructive is to imply she's an unwitting tool.

Which is not what Sanders is doing. He would certainly say he does not regard her that way. But that's what we're left with when he talks out both sides of his mouth about "the establishment" and its candidate Clinton, and about how he's definitely totally for sure not impugning Clinton's character.

The attack on the establishment cannot coexist with a claim not to be personally attacking Clinton when calling her an establishment candidate.

3. I have been repeatedly criticized for dinging Sanders on the idea that he is relying on a movement of millions to not only sweep him, but also a Democratic majority, into office—even as he continues to refuse to do down-ballot fundraising for Democratic Congressional candidates. But I have not imagined his delusions of grandeur, and here he is engaging in them once again:
Sanders: First of all, if I win, it will almost by definition mean that there will be a very large voter turnout. That's what I believe. If there is a very large voter turnout, I think the odds are pretty strong Democrats will regain control of the Senate, do better in the House. Can they win the House? I don't know. But they will do better.

But more importantly, if I win, it will mean that millions of people now want to be involved in the political process in a way that has not previously existed.
Welp.

I have said many times that Sanders actively exploits ignorance about how politics and the government work—and I have begun to suspect that he himself doesn't totally understand how national politics and the presidency work. This interview, which is honestly one of the most disastrous interviews with a Democratic presidential candidate I have ever read, seems (unfortunately) to confirm my instinct.

He cannot provide details on how he will enact his proposals; he admits he has not studied relevant law; he exhibits aggressive disdain for a candidate who does know these things, and in fact treats her admirable ability to navigate these processes and institutions as a disqualifying feature; and he believes, despite all evidence to the contrary, that he can single-handedly inspire a revolution that will defeat entrenched Republican obstructionism.

This should be very worrying indeed to Sanders supporters, who want and expect Sanders to actually deliver on his promises. The fact is, he can't. He doesn't know how.

Open Wide...

The Monday Blogaround

This blogaround brought to you by glass.

Recommended Reading:

Imani: [Content Note: Homophobia; transphobia] Boom! Lawyered: Levels of Judicial Scrutiny Edition

Shailee: [CN: Racism; othering] My Name Was Anglicized—But I'm Taking It Back

Miriam: SCOTUS Unanimously Affirms 'One Person, One Vote' Principle

Jenn: [CN: Racism; Christian Supremacy] Sikh American Wins Right to Wear Beard, Turban From U.S. Army

Keith: [CN: Racism; image of blackface] German Soccer Team Attempts to Fight Racism with Blackface

Laura: The Grotesque, Mesmerizing Weirdness of #DentistSelfies

David: Associated Press Style: No More Capitalizing Internet and Web

Leave your links and recommendations in comments. Self-promotion welcome and encouraged!

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime



Sheriff: "When I'm with You"

Open Wide...

The Walking Thread

[Content Note: Spoilers are lurching around undeadly herein. Descriptions of violence.]

screen cap from The Walking Dead of Jeffrey Dean Morgan as Negan, with a bat slung over his shoulder, smiling
"Oh, hello!"

In the final moments of last week's episode, D-Bag Dwight snuck up behind Daryl and pointed a gun at him, then fired, and blood squirted all over the lens, obscuring our view of what happened. If you thought that DRAMATIC CLIFFHANGER would pay off in this episode, HAHA YOU WERE WRONG and what were you even thinking?! This is The Walking Dead, not some show that treats its viewers with respect!

This episode picks up the same three threads from last week, with Morgan trying to persuade Carol to go back to Aarontown; Michonne, Daryl, Glenn, and Rosita Espinosa being held hostage by The Saviors; and Optimus Grimes, Pirate Carl, Aaron, Sasha, Sgt. Redbull, and Doctor Mulletsworth fixing to try to get Maggie and her PREGNANCY PERIL! to the doctor at the Hilltop.

We open on light streaming through holes in a dark room and the sound of breathing. It's supposed to be a Big Mystery, but if you're familiar with the cheap bullshit this show pulls on the regular, you've already figured out it's Daryl. (P.S. It's Daryl.)

But that won't be confirmed until much, much later in this supersized episode, approximately at the time you've even forgotten that Daryl was supposed to have been shot anyway.

In the meantime, we traipse around with Morgan, who finds a horse, and he rides around until he finds Carol. They have some more cool conversations about how Carol's agency should be thrown in a dumpster, and Carol continues to say stupid things written by terrible writers about how she doesn't want to go back because she doesn't want to kill people anymore, despite the fact that even staying alive on her own for 24 hours has necessitated a mass murder spree.

For some reason, Morgan leaves, and when he comes back, Carol is gone. He takes off on his new horse friend to find her. She's found first by The Savior who survived her killing spree and has been tracking her. He gives a cool speech about how he wants to watch her die slowly and then shoots her in the arm, and then in the leg. Carol is relieved that he's killing her. Then Morgan shows up and shoots The Savior. SO MUCH PERFECT TIMING IN THE ZOMBIEPOCALYPSE! Carol begs Morgan to let her die, but Morgan is all, "I think we've had this discussion about how your agency is not relevant, little lady," and just then two dudes wearing LARP armor show up, looking for their missing horse, and they offer to get Carol the medical assistance she doesn't want.

Morgan shakes hands with one of them, and in that handshake, we can safely assume that a crucial alliance has been forged to defeat the Big Bad next season. Thank goodness wise men never respect women's choices!

Speaking of which, back at Aarontown, Grimes Gang Alpha is preparing to pile into the RV to save Maggie. Enid wants to go, but Pirate Carl doesn't want her to go, so he locks her in a closet. The perfect move by the perfect little patriarch-in-training! Enid shout-asks what the hell she's supposed to do if he doesn't come back, and he tells her to "just survive somehow," throwing her personal mantra back in her face, and it's like, I'm pretty sure she was just asking how the fuck she's going to get out of the closet, you little shit.

Anyway. Optimus Grimes leaves Gabriel in charge (sure), and off they go. Maggie is totally stressed out, but is, unaccountably, comforted when Optimus Grimes tells her, "As long as it's all of us, we can do anything." If I were Maggie, I would have replied, "Tell that to my dad's severed zombie head!" But instead, she tells Optimus Grimes: "I believe in you, Rick."

That was your first mistake, Maggie! And most of your subsequent mistakes, too!

Elsewhere in the RV, people have cool conversations about how cool they are. Aaron owes Maggie. Pirate Carl owes The Saviors. Sgt. Redbull would totes have a baby with Sasha. Etc.

Throughout the day, Optimus Grimes & Co. continually hit roadblocks put up by The Saviors. A blockade of waiting Saviors who demand "all their stuff," but doesn't kill them, allowing them to retreat. Another, larger group of Saviors blocking a different road, who again allow them to retreat. A line of zombies chained together across yet a different road, one of whom has been shot with some of Daryl's arrows and another one of whom has some of Michonne's dreadlocks stapled to its head. A dam of logs, which is set ablaze, down still another path. All roads to the Hilltop are being blocked. Maggie gets even sicker.

They debate what their next move should be, and Doctor Mulletsworth suggests that The Saviors are looking for the RV at this point and so they might be able to sneak through the woods on foot. They wait for the cover of darkness after nightfall, then Doctor Mulletsworth takes the empty RV to try to fake out The Saviors, while the rest of Grimes Gang make for the Hilltop, carrying Maggie on a stretcher.

And, in typical good-decision-making fashion, they have loud conversations as they tromp through the forest.

Suddenly they're interrupted by the sound of whistling all around them. Oh no! They are surrounded by Saviors! However did they locate Grimes Gang and foil their fool-proof plan of sneaking loudly through the forest?!

Grimes Gang is forced to their knees. Doctor Mulletsworth has been taken captive, too, and he is on his knees, with no dicks in biting proximity. D-Bag Dwight opens a van, revealing Daryl, Michonne, Rosita Espinosa, and Glenn, who are also forced to their knees.

GRIMES GANG HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO THEIR KNEES. SYMBOLISM.

Finally, at long last, we meet the infamous Negan. It's Jeffrey Dean Morgan looking HOT AS FUCK in a leather jacket and perfectly cut jeans. No flannel shirt for this monster! He's carrying a bat wrapped in barbed wire, to which he refers as Lucille.

I frantically scramble to reset my Jeffrey Dean Morgan meter, as I have been CRUSHING MAJORLY ON HIM on this season's The Good Wife, on which he has been AMAZING AND FABULOUS AND SEXY AND COOL AND DECIDEDLY NON-NEGAN LIKE.

"I'm Negan," says the very hot man who I love so much, while I push away the thought TEAM NEGAN. "You work for me now. You have shit; you give it to me." He delivers an awkward bit of exposition that explains why The Saviors have not just simply killed Grimes Gang: Because he wants them to work for him. He doesn't want to grow a fucking garden! Christ!

Optimus Grimes looks like he's going to barf, and, I have to admit, I don't feel very sorry for him! This is how lots of people have felt as Grimes Gang has murdered them! The murder shoe is on the other murder foot!

Except, Negan doesn't want to murder them, as we've established. He does, however, want to "beat the holy hell" out of one of them, as punishment for killing his people, which made him very unhappy. He tortures them by slowly walking around their group with his heinous fuckbat, trying to choose which one of them to beat within an inch of their lives.

"Eenie, meenie, minie, moe," he says, pointing his heinous fuckbat at them. Eventually he gets to, "And you are it!" and then begins to bash the person who was "it," though, of course, we don't get to see who that person is, because this fucking show.

The heinous fuckbat smashes down again and again, to the sound of screams and crushing bones, and that is the end of the episode. And I guess the moral of this season's story is: Go ahead and be terrible, because there is always someone even more terrible than you out there who will make you look not so bad!

Next week: NOTHING! Because this was the season finale, so you'll have to wait until next year for more of this garbage! See you then!

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Matilda the Fuzzy Sealpoint Cat sitting on the arm of the couch, looking into the distance
Matilda is either: 1. Plotting world domination. 2. Thinking about Tony.

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

In the News

Here is some stuff in the news today...

This hasn't gotten a whole lot of attention this primary cycle, but their views on biomedical research constitute a significant difference between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders: "While serving in the House, Sanders voted to ban therapeutic cloning in 2001, 2003, and 2005 as Congress grappled with the ethics of biotechnology and scientific advances. Patient advocacy groups note that Sanders co-sponsored bans in 2003 and 2005 that included criminal penalties for conducting the research and opposed alternatives that would have allowed the cloning of embryos solely for medical research. Clinton, meanwhile, co-sponsored legislation in 2001 and 2002 in the Senate that would have expanded stem cell research and co-sponsored a bill in 2005 that would have banned human cloning while protecting the right of scientists to conduct stem cell research. ...'Sanders and (then Republican House Majority Leader Tom) DeLay—some unlikely group—were just unyielding and they were part of the religious right's attempt to shut down this whole critical new frontier of therapy for chronic disease,' said Robert Klein, chairman of the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine. 'It's fine to say you're for stem cell research but you vote against it and you vote against all therapeutic application, it doesn't mean anything to say you're for it,' Klein said. 'Fine, he votes for it years later when it's more popular and the pressure is off. We needed leadership then.'" Welp.

In other election news, I've got a new piece, co-written with Peter Daou, at Blue Nation Review about how Team Sanders admits that their line of attack on Hillary Clinton is indeed a "personal attack," despite the fact that he promised not to run a negative campaign and still insists that he isn't: "Over and over again, from calling Hillary emblematic of 'the establishment,' to inextricably tying her to 'Wall Street' by making allusions to her privately earned speaking fees, to fomenting conspiracy theories about how the Democratic Party is rigging the primary for Hillary—repeatedly hammering talking points that connect her to the institutions Bernie criticizes as the raison d’être for his calls for revolution—Bernie's campaign and surrogates have implicated Hillary as corrupt."

[Content Note: Gendered violence] Meanwhile, Trump can't even say immediately and with conviction that men shouldn't physically harm women. There is literally no bar low enough for this guy that he can easily step over it.

[CN: War on agency] And by way of perfect example that he's not an outlier in his party in this regard: "When GOP frontrunner Donald Trump said there should be 'some form of punishment' for women who end a pregnancy earlier this week, criticisms came flying from the left and, most tellingly, from the right. ...As Trump backtracked, presidential candidate and Ohio Gov. John Kasich also rejected the idea. 'I don't think that's an appropriate response and it's a difficult enough situation than to try to punish somebody…abortions shouldn't be punished,' he said. Yet on Sunday morning Kasich told ABC's This Week that it is up to the states to decide on punishment. Regardless of his beliefs, that stance creates an opportunity for states to create laws that punish doctors or women as they see fit. 'We're going to leave this up to the states to work this out the way they want to,' said Kasich. George Stephanopoulos pleaded for him to provide more details, including on whether he'd support punishments for doctors. Kasich refused to answer. 'Today, I'm not. I've just told you how I feel about it,' Kasich said, eager to cut off the discussion."

[CN: Accident; death; injury] Yesterday, an Amtrak train on the Northeast Corridor route struck a backhoe that was sitting on the track just outside Philadelphia, killing two people and injuring dozens more. There is, so far, no explanation as to why the backhoe was sitting on the tracks. "Clearly this seems very likely to be human error," U.S. Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York said. "There is virtually no excuse for a backhoe to be on an active track."

[CN: Rape culture] Kesha disclosed yesterday that she had been offered freedom from her contract, but only if she lied about what Dr. Luke did to her: "I got offered my freedom IF i were to lie. I would have to APOLOGIZE publicly and say that I never got raped. THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS behind closed doors. I will not take back the TRUTH. I would rather let the truth ruin my career than lie for a monster ever again." Naturally, Dr. Luke's spokesperson released a disgusting statement smearing Kesha in return. Fucking hell.

Democratic California Governor Jerry Brown has signed legislation that will raise California's mandatory minimum wage to $15 an hour by 2022. I still think that a truly livable (rather than minimum) wage based on local data is better, because there will be some places in California where $15 isn't enough, and where $15 might drive small businesses (including lots of small businesses owned by minorities and/or women) out of business. But that said, this is far better than nothing.

But the jury is still out on climate change: "Snow falls in [the southern Caribbean island] Guadeloupe in extraordinary weather phenomenon: The event, which was described as 'exceptional' by a French meteorologist took place on Thursday, March 31 in the municipality of St. Claude. Reports from French media indicate that a very fine snowfall blanketed the hills above the town."

Yowza! "Scientists have found a rare three-star system 685 light years away. Instead of the more typical single star, or even a pair, it boasts a trio of suns that coexist in a complex dance. And the system is rare even among the triple-threat crowd: It hosts a stable planet, which is something scientists have seen only three times before." So cool.

And finally! Did you know that "Keyboard Cat" Bento was a shelter rescue? Well, he is! And his adopter Charlie says: "Bento is my best friend." Aww. ♥

Open Wide...

In Support of Lucy DeCoutere

[Content note: intimate partner violence, rape culture, disbelief of survivors.]

It's really amazing how much people in our society say they support the survivors of intimate partner abuse. Until they have an actual survivor who needs their support.

Over the weekend, reports emerged that Mike Smith, who stars as Bubbles in the television show Trailer Park Boys, had been arrested and charged with domestic battery in Los Angeles. A statement of support for Smith appeared on TrailerParkBoys.com, in which both Smith and Georgia Ling, the woman involved in the complaint, disputed the charge. The statement claimed that "other members of the Trailer Park Boys and staff" all stand with Smith.

Some time after that statement appeared, cast member Lucy DeCoutere Tweeted that she had left the show, after issuing a Tweet that noted: "If I find out someone is abusive, I cut them out of my life. It’s very easy."

And then the shitstorm of verbal abuse towards Ms. DeCoutere began.

I'm utterly appalled by the suggestion that DeCoutere or any abuse survivor is obliged to act a certain way when someone close to them is charged with battery. Based on the reporting, it's unclear to me whether DeCoutere resigned over this incident, or had previously resigned and was simply announcing it in relation to the press release, which implied the entire cast supported Smith. (A publicist later clarified that the statement about support from "other members of the Trailer Park Boys" only represented the opinions of Robb Wells and J. P. Tremblay, Smith's co-stars.)

Regardless of the sequence of events, the demands that she should join in publicly supporting Smith, or wait until courts reached a verdict to make a judgement about him, and other directives about how she should react, are utterly appalling.

For anyone who doesn’t remember, DeCoutere was one of the complainants in the Jian Ghomeshi trial, and one who allowed her name to be made public. And when I say "Jian Ghomeshi trial," I might more accurately say "trial of the honesty and character of his accusers," since that’s what it became. Not only was Ghomeshi acquitted, the judge’s remarks were a victim blaming shitfest full of harmful stereotypes about survivors. DeCoutere’s activism was held against her. The friendship of the complainants was labelled "collusion." (The judge’s connection to the defence attorney wan't ever mentioned, of course.) The entire thing is Exhibit A in answering the question “why don’t survivors go to the police?”

I can’t even begin to imagine how it would feel to go through that experience, so very publicly, and then turn around and be once again shoved into the spotlight because of intimate partner violence issues, barely more than a week later. Yet somehow perfect strangers think they have a right to dictate how DeCoutere should process this experience?

And most obscenely, that she should prioritize an accused batterer's needs above her own?

Fuck. That. Shit.

Listen, I get that for fans of the show, the news about Smith is really hard to wrap one's mind around. The character he plays, Bubbles, is gentle, kind and caring. It’s not easy to reconcile that with the charges laid in Los Angeles. But if that's troubling you, then work that out on your own time. Expecting Lucy DeCoutere to make some statement of support for Smith in order that you can feel better about him, which is what many fans seem to be demanding, is fundamentally indecent

I also get that this is complicated by Ms. Ling's statements of support for Smith, denying that she ever felt in any real danger and condemning the police for the arrest. But using Ling's public statements about the incident to tell DeCoutere what to do or say isn't supporting either woman. It's just more bullying. (For the record, I support Ling as well, and I hope she gets whatever resources to get through what has got to be an incredibly difficult period of her life, as well as to deal with any continuing fallout that may occur for her.) Lucy DeCoutere is entitled to her own opinion and judgements, and most of all, to her own feelings.

Those who think that DeCoutere needs to set her feelings aside (or worse yet, not to have feelings about this at all) and say something nice about Mike Smith are behaving ludicrously and dangerously. Prioritizing a man’s reputation over a survivor's health and safety fuels rape culture and enables abuse. Doing so not only hurts Lucy DeCoutere, it hurts every other survivor who sees this shit. It only serves to reinforce the wretched notion that we survivors aren’t allow to take control of our own lives.

And I utterly reject that.

If you're only my ally in theory, you're not my ally at all.

Ms. DeCoutere, I take up space in solidarity with you, and support you as you move forward with your own health and healing. Rock on, lady, in whatever way seems best.

[Commenting note: I recognize that Trailer Park Boys is a show that can be very problematic from a social justice perspective. While that’s a worthy topic of discussion, it’s really not relevant to supporting Lucy DeCoutere as a survivor, so I ask that it not be the topic of this thread. Keeping support for survivors centered is in and of itself a feminist act.]

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

[Content Note: War on agency. NB: Not only women need access to abortion.]

"Everything I've heard from Donald Trump and his fellow Republican candidates for president has convinced me that they have no regard for women or our ability to maintain autonomy over our own lives and futures. They all want limited government—except when it comes to intruding on women's health. Reproductive health and rights are a fundamental part of women's health and rights. And reproductive health includes abortion. So defending women's health and rights means defending access to abortion—not just in principle but in practice. In 1995, I traveled to Beijing for the Fourth U.N. World Conference on Women. I addressed human rights abuses in China—including violations of reproductive rights. The message of that conference still echoes around the world today: women's rights are human rights. And reproductive rights are human rights, too."—Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, affirming her commitment to abortion access, in a great essay.

[H/T to Shaker Lysis.]

Open Wide...

This Isn't Sufficient

For some time, a number of people have questioned why Senator Bernie Sanders has not released his tax returns. He has released an IRS Form 1040, which is a tax summary, but is not a full return. By comparison, Hillary Clinton has made her tax returns available going back to the year 1992.

On Friday, David Cay Johnston published a piece asking why Sanders, who is an advocate of transparency, has not released his tax returns. The piece got an enormous amount of notice, and, yesterday, on CNN's State of the Union, Jake Tapper asked Sanders about his tax returns.

Transcript of relevant excerpt beginning at 5:22 (complete transcript available here):

TAPPER: Let's talk about taxes—specifically about your tax returns. I have to say: I'm kind of surprised that you haven't gone further on transparency. You released the summary page of your 2014 tax returns. Hillary Clinton has posted on her website the last eight years of her personal returns—all of the returns. Before the New York primary, will you match her? Will you post your full returns for the last eight years?

SANDERS: You know, we are not—you know, to be very honest with you, you know who does our tax returns? My wife does our tax returns. We have been a little bit busy lately. So, we will get out as much information as we can. There ain't going to be very much exciting in that. I get a salary from the United States Senate. You know, there's not going to be anything new in it that there hasn't—people haven't seen for the last many years. But we will get it out as soon as we can.

TAPPER: But nobody—nobody has seen them at all, I guess, is the point, and whether or not there's anything exciting in them—

SANDERS: No, that is not true. That is—that is not true. Of course, we have released them in the past. Our financial situation, to the best of my knowledge, has not changed very much, but we will get out all of that information as soon as we can.
Okay. Wow. So, first of all, let me just say that, honestly, I don't even know how much I value candidates releasing their tax returns, or think they should be obliged to do it. But I do care when multiple candidates—in fact, every remaining presidential candidate except Clinton—have claimed to have released their tax returns but haven't, yet it's Clinton who continually gets dinged by the media for her resistance to transparency.

And I actually care quite a bit that a sitting United States Senator who is running for the presidency casually says that his wife, who is not a certified accountant or tax preparer, does their taxes, and, for some reason, that's supposed to be an explanation as to why he can't release them. What the shit?

That is just embarrassing stuff.

And let us be brutally honest here: Hillary Clinton would never get away with an answer like that in a million years. Nor should she. And the first person who would line up to not let her get away with it is Bernie Sanders.

So why is it that he is not holding himself to the same standards he expects of his opponent?

Surely even his most diehard supporters have to be getting itchy with their candidate's refusal to live up to the expectations he has set for Hillary Clinton.

If they're not, they're really not paying attention. Or they really don't have any standards at all.

Open Wide...

The Panama Papers

[Content Note: Class warfare.]

Yesterday, following an investigation including journalists from more than 80 countries, the Guardian published a report on "the Panama Papers," 11.5m files comprising 2.6 terabytes of data "leaked from the database of Mossack Fonseca, the world's fourth biggest offshore law firm. The records were obtained from an anonymous source by the German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung and shared by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists with the Guardian and the BBC."

Within those files are details on "the hidden wealth of some of the world's most prominent leaders, politicians, and celebrities" and "documents that show the myriad ways in which the rich can exploit secretive offshore tax regimes."

The Panama Papers reveal:

* Twelve national leaders are among 143 politicians, their families, and close associates from around the world known to have been using offshore tax havens.

* A $2bn trail leads all the way to Vladimir Putin. The Russian president's best friend—a cellist called Sergei Roldugin—is at the centre of a scheme in which money from Russian state banks is hidden offshore. Some of it ends up in a ski resort where in 2013 Putin's daughter Katerina got married.

* Among national leaders with offshore wealth are Nawaz Sharif, Pakistan's prime minister; Ayad Allawi, ex-interim prime minister and former vice-president of Iraq; Petro Poroshenko, president of Ukraine; Alaa Mubarak, son of Egypt's former president; and the prime minister of Iceland, Sigmundur Davíð Gunnlaugsson.

* Six members of the House of Lords, three former Conservative MPs, and dozens of donors to UK political parties have had offshore assets.

*The families of at least eight current and former members of China's supreme ruling body, the politburo, have been found to have hidden wealth offshore.

* Twenty-three individuals who have had sanctions imposed on them for supporting the regimes in North Korea, Zimbabwe, Russia, Iran, and Syria have been clients of Mossack Fonseca. Their companies were harboured by the Seychelles, the British Virgin Islands, Panama, and other jurisdictions.

* A key member of Fifa's powerful ethics committee, which is supposed to be spearheading reform at world football's scandal-hit governing body, acted as a lawyer for individuals and companies recently charged with bribery and corruption.

* One leaked memorandum from a partner of Mossack Fonseca said: "Ninety-five per cent of our work coincidentally consists in selling vehicles to avoid taxes."
The Guardian has also provided a very simple factsheet on the basics of the investigation and what's been found.

Most (and possibly all) of what's been uncovered in the Panama Papers is legal. Which doesn't mean it's ethical. At this point, what it reveals indisputably is that there are powerful people of extreme wealth who play by entirely different rules than the rest of us.

On the one hand, no kidding. On the other hand, seeing evidence laying out just how different those rules are is pretty breathtaking.

Anyway. Here's a thread to talk about the Panama Papers, as well as the habits and ethics of the people who hide their money to avoid having to pay taxes, while many of them would spend long hours telling you about the loathsomeness of poor people who mooch and take and don't contribute their fair shares.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of a peacock in flight

Hosted by a peacock. Image credit: Zhayynn James.

From a really cool photo series at Bored Panda of peacocks in mid-flight.

Open Wide...

The Virtual Pub Is Open

image of a pub Photoshopped to be named 'The Boring Old Lady Pub'
[Explanations: lol your fat. pathetic anger bread. hey your gay.]

TFIF, Shakers!

Belly up to the bar,
and name your poison!

Open Wide...

The Friday Blogaround

This blogaround brought to you by swirls.

Recommended Reading:

Daniel: This Is the Scariest Sentence You Will Ever Read About the Internet

Suzy: [Content Note: Transphobia] Visible Ordinariness: The Journey Towards Protection, Acceptance, and Equality for Trans People

Ragen: [CN: Fat hatred; image of creepy-crawly] The Thing About Concern Trolls

Digby: [CN: Human rights violations] Rand Paul Makes a Tough Decision

Maddie: We Finally Know What's up with These Enormous Mounds on Mars

Alex: Why Desperately Seeking Susan Is One of My Favorite Films

Leave your links and recommendations in comments. Self-promotion welcome and encouraged!

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime



Mary Hopkin: "Those Were the Days"

Open Wide...