
Hosted by witch hazel.
Suggested by Shaker Heather T.: "What line or phrase that you've read from Shakesville has stayed with you in a particularly meaningful way? Like a pocket charm or talisman you take out and look at every once in awhile?"
To be clear, and as always: "Shakesville" does not mean "Melissa McEwan." There are lots of great contributors, on the main page and in comments, who have written amazing things in this space, lots of which stay with me in meaningful ways.
The first thing that came to my mind was this quote from my dear, departed friend Maud: "There are times when you must speak, not because you are going to change the other person, but because if you don't speak, they have changed you."
And the second was when commenter JupiterPluvius calmly, brilliantly, and memorably explained to a troll who was missing the point: "What you are doing, sir, is the equivalent of going into a pie-shop and demanding a jellied eel, because the jellied-eel shop had been closed down after a gang of hooligans had demolished the place. SIR, YOU ARE TOO LATE FOR THE JELLIED EELS. HERE, WE HAVE ONLY PIE."
On Valentine's Day, Paul Feig gave us all a gift by sharing the first teaser trailer for this summer's Ghostbusters reboot! Yayayayayay!
Video Description: The sound of wind over a sweeping view of New York City at dusk. Text onscreen: "WHO." Film of police cars, lights spinning, racing down a New York City street. Text onscreen: "YOU." Film of military personnel running, as a single note begins to crescendo. Text onscreen: "GONNA." Military personnel kneeling in the street with guns. Text onscreen: "CALL?" Ghostbusters logo. Text onscreen: "Trailer premiere 3.3.16."Omgomgomgomg! SO EXCITED!

This blogaround brought to you by markers.
Recommended Reading:
Zoë: [Content Note: Domestic violence; harassment; threats; abuse; sex worker stigma] Why I Just Dropped the Harassment Charges against the Man Who Started GamerGate
Madison: Stevie Wonder Just Made a Powerful Statement at the Grammys about People with Disabilities
Ragen: [CN: Fat hatred; weight loss surgery] Craigslist Ad: Free Weight Loss Surgery for Marketing
Angry Asian Man: Chloe Kim Selected as Team USA's Flag Bearer at the 2016 Youth Winter Olympic Games
Nicole: [CN: Mother-shaming; misogyny; Walking Dead spoilers] Lori Grimes for Mother of the Year
Maddie: [CN: Colonialism] Scientists Discover a Boiling River of Amazonian Legend
Keith: First Confirmation Trailer Released, Starring Kerry Washington as Anita Hill
Leave your links and recommendations in comments. Self-promotion welcome and encouraged!
[Content Note: There is a strobe editing effect in this video.]
[Content Note: Spoilers are lurching around undeadly herein. Descriptions of violence.]


This is, for those who have requested it, your bi-monthly reminder to donate to Shakesville and an important fundraiser to keep Shakesville going.
If you value the content and/or community in this space, please consider setting up a subscription or making a one-time contribution.
If you have appreciated being able to tune into Shakesville and/or my Twitter feed for coverage of the presidential primaries, for getting distilled news about politics or other topics, for a safe and image-free space to discuss difficult subjects, for pop culture deconstruction, for recipes, for the Fat Fashion threads, or for whatever else you appreciate at Shakesville, whether it's the moderation, community in the Open Threads, Film Corner, video transcripts, the blogarounds, or anything else, please remember that Shakesville is run exclusively on donations.
I cannot afford to do this full-time for free, but, even if I could, fundraising is also one of the most feminist acts I do here. I ask to be paid for my work because progressive feminist advocacy has value; because women's work has value.
I would certainly be grateful for your support, if you are able to chip in. The donation link is in the sidebar to the right. Or click here.
Thank you to each of you who donates or has donated, whether monthly or as a one-off. I am deeply appreciative. This community couldn't exist without that support, truly. Thank you.
My thanks as well to everyone who contributes to the space in other ways, whether as a contributor, a moderator, a guest writer, a transcriber, and/or as someone who takes the time to send me a note of support and encouragement. (Or a cool drawing!) This community couldn't exist without you, either.
Please note that I don't want anyone to feel obliged to contribute financially, especially if money is tight. There is a big enough readership that no one needs to donate if it would be a hardship, and no one should ever feel bad about that. ♥
Here is some stuff in the news today...
[Content Note: War on agency; anti-choice terrorism] More absolutely heinous fuckery from the Conservative Legislation Lab: Indiana House Bill 1337 is an utterly appalling anti-choice piece of legislation, which will be heard in committee tomorrow. Earlier today, Harmony tweeted some important information about the bill, and I am sharing her tweets here with her permission:
We need to talk about #HB1337, being heard in committee tomorrow. It's an anti-abortion bill with 3 main issues.Teaspoons ahoy, Shakers!
Issue 1: would add a new hoop for abortion seeking patients to jump through, requiring an ultrasound 18 hours before procedure. Right now, patients have to hear state required info 18 hours before, but the ultrasound can be done day of. Requiring it earlier? Means that patients may need to travel farther, multiple times. More time off work, more childcare, etc. No reason for it.
Issue 2 with #HB1337: would share admitting privileges and backup agreements for abortion providers with all hospitals in county or contiguous. This is just another way to stigmatize abortion providers and cut them off from local doctors who provide their backup by making info public. Anti-abortion protesters will show up at the schools of doctors' CHILDREN. Flier their neighborhoods. Kill them. #HB1337 opens them to this. There is no reason hospitals need this info. Patients who experience complications post abortion will receive care no matter where they go. And since most patients seeking abortion have to travel so far from home, this info is even more useless for local hospitals.
Issue 3 with #HB1337: MANDATES that remains from miscarriages OR abortions be buried or cremated. Totally shames patients and takes autonomy. Current law allows patients to CHOOSE. #HB1337 removes that choice. Shameful.
So, now that we've talked about why #HB1337 is bad, let's talk about what to do next.
First thing: talk about it! #INLegis is def hoping that after the disappointment of not passing LGBTQ protections, you won't be paying attention to abortion issues. Next thing let's make sure local media is paying attention to #HB1337. So @indystar @rtv6 @NUVO_net @WTHRcom will you be @ #INLegis tomorrow? It's also important that legislators hear about opposition to #HB1337, so feel free to call the committee!
Despite the Republicans' entirely typical caterwauling that President Obama should not nominate a replacement for Justice Antonin Scalia, the President has said that he will indeed nominate a replacement.
As well he should. And without the Republicans behaving like relentless assholes.
In an op-ed for the Washington Post, published under the blunt headline "For the good of the country, stop your nakedly partisan obstruction," Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid takes the Republicans to task for their bullshit:
We are entering uncharted waters in the history of the U.S. system of checks and balances, with potentially momentous consequences. Having gridlocked the Senate for years, Republicans now want to gridlock the Supreme Court with a campaign of partisan sabotage aimed at denying the president's constitutional duty to pick nominees.There is much more at the link.
Republicans should not insult the American people's intelligence by pretending there is historical precedent for what they are about to do. There is not.
The Senate has confirmed Supreme Court nominees both in election years and in the last year of a presidency — as recently as 1988, a presidential election year when a Democratic Senate confirmed President Ronald Reagan's nomination of Justice Anthony M. Kennedy in the final year of his administration. My colleague and the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), was a member of the Judiciary Committee then and voted to confirm Kennedy. More recently, Sen. Grassley stated, "The reality is that the Senate has never stopped confirming judicial nominees during the last few months of a president's term." That is true.
For his part, my counterpart, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), on Saturday called for the American people to have a "voice" in this process. Their voice was heard loud and clear when they elected and reelected President Obama, twice handing him the constitutional power to nominate Supreme Court justices.
That is how our system works and has worked for more than 200 years. Until now, even through all the partisan battles of recent decades, the Senate's constitutional duty to give a fair and timely hearing and a floor vote to the president's Supreme Court nominees has remained inviolable. This Republican Senate would be the first in history to abdicate that vital duty.
So, there was yet another Republican debate over the weekend. Each one of these things is worse than the last, and this one got worse by exponential proportions. Donald Trump was literally just screaming at Jeb Bush and Ted Cruz; Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio were screaming at each other; the audience was booing; the words coming out of the candidates' faces when they even bothered to talk policy were heinous in the extreme.
The Washington Post has a full transcript of the debate, and I Storified my live-tweeting.
I noted last Friday, in coverage of the last Democratic debate: "The Democratic debates are infinitely more substantive than the Republican debates. It's genuinely shocking (and terrifying) how huge the disparity is." And the last Republican debate only underscored how extraordinary that disparity really is.

Moderator John Dickerson of CBS News: On Monday, George W. Bush will campaign in South Carolina for his brother. As you've said tonight, and you've often said, the Iraq War and your opposition to it was a sign of your good judgment. In 2008, in an interview with Wolf Blitzer, talking about President George W. Bush's conduct of the war, you said you were surprised that Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi didn't try to impeach him. You said, quote, "which personally I think would have been a wonderful thing." Close quote. When you were asked what you meant by that and you said: "For the war, for the war, he lied, he got us into the war with lies." Do you still believe President Bush should be—should have been impeached?Of all the things Donald Trump has said during this campaign worth booing, worth getting upset about, worth yelling at him about, Jeb Bush loses it over Trump saying that his brother was a shitty president who took us to war on a bunch of lies. And why? Because despite Trump's unabashed rhetoric that makes plain how gross Republican policies really are, whether George W. Bush needs defending is basically Trump's and Jeb Bush's only major point of disagreement.
Trump: First of all, I have to say, as a businessman I get along with everybody. I have business all over the world. [jeers and booing] I know so many of the people in the audience. And by the way, I'm a self-funder. I don't have—I have my wife and I have my son. That's all I have. I don't have this. [smattering of applause] So let me just tell you, I get along with everybody, which is my obligation to my company, to myself, et cetera.
Obviously, the war in Iraq was a big, fat mistake. All right? Now, you can take it any way you want, and it took—it took Jeb Bush, if you remember, at the beginning of his announcement, when he announced for president, it took him five days. He went back—it was a mistake; it wasn't a mistake. It took him five days before his people told him what to say, and he ultimately said, "It was a mistake."
The war in Iraq—we spent $2 trillion, thousands of lives, we don't even have it. Iran is taking over Iraq with the second-largest oil reserves in the world. Obviously, it was a mistake.
Dickerson: So—
Trump: George Bush made a mistake. We can make mistakes. But that one was a beauty. We should have never been in Iraq. We have destabilized the Middle East.
Dickerson: But so I'm going to— So you still think he should be impeached?
Bush: I think it's my turn, isn't it?
Trump: You do whatever you want. You call it whatever you want. I want to tell you: They lied. They said there were weapons of mass destruction; there were none. And they knew there were none. There were no weapons of mass destruction! [booing]
Dickerson: All right. Okay. All right. Governor Bush, when a member on the stage's brother gets attacked—
Bush: I've got about five or six—
Dickerson: —the brother gets to respond.
Bush: Do I get to do it five or six times or just once responding to that?
Trump: I'm being nice.
Bush: So here's the deal. I'm sick and tired of Barack Obama blaming my brother for all of the problems that he's had. [cheers and applause] And, frankly, I could care less about the insults that Donald Trump gives to me. It's blood sport for him. He enjoys it. And I'm glad he's happy about it. But I am sick and tired...
Trump: He spent $22 million in—
Bush: I am sick and tired of him going after my family. My dad is the greatest man alive in my mind. [applause] And while Donald Trump was building a reality TV show, my brother was building a security apparatus to keep us safe. And I'm proud of what he did. [applause] And he's had the gall to go after my brother.
Trump: The World Trade Center came down during your brother's reign, remember that. [booing]
Bush: He's had the gall to go after my mother. Hold on. Let me finish. He has had the gall to go after my mother.
Trump: That's not keeping us safe.
Bush: Look, I won the lottery when I was born 63 years ago, looked up, and I saw my mom. My mom is the strongest woman I know.
Trump: She should be running.
Bush: This is not about my family or his family. This is about the South Carolina families that need someone to be a commander-in-chief that can lead. And I'm that person.
"I plan to fulfill my constitutional responsibilities to nominate a successor in due time. There will be plenty of time for me to do so and for the Senate to fulfill its responsibility to give that person a fair hearing and a timely vote. These are responsibilities that I take seriously, as should everyone. They're bigger than any one party. They are about our democracy."—President Obama, responding to the Republicans' outpouring of garbage words about how he should not nominate a replacement for Justice Scalia, but leave it for the next president, and that, if he doesn't, they will endeavor to obstruct and delay the confirmation hearing for his nominee.
It's not just President Obama's right as the elected and sitting president to nominate someone to the court; it's his responsibility.
So of course President Obama is going to nominate someone to the Supreme Court. Because he knows how to do his fucking job. Unlike Republicans.
At the Republican debate last night, all of the candidates suggested either or both that Obama shouldn't nominate someone in an election year or should nominate someone conservative. They all went on about how Obama should nominate a "consensus candidate," even as they promised to nominate conservatives if elected.
Hillary Clinton had a few thoughts about that bullshit. Namely: That President Obama is still president, and Republicans can go fuck themselves.
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia has died in Texas at age 79.
My condolences to his family and friends.
You know the old adage: If you don't have anything nice to say.
...

So, Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders met in Milwaukee last night for another debate. I watched and live-tweeted it; for anyone who would like to see those tweets, I've collected them in a Storify.
The Washington Post has a complete transcript of the debate.
My primary takeaways:
1. The Democratic debates are infinitely more substantive than the Republican debates. It's genuinely shocking (and terrifying) how huge the disparity is.
2. Sanders is not merely passionate about wealth inequality; it is virtually all he cares about. His opening statement, his closing statement, and any answer to any question that could possibly be answered thus were dedicated to wealth inequality. Even when he is asked to speak about racism or sexism, he talks about wealth inequality. He does not seem amenable to embracing an intersectional analysis at all. Racism? Solve it with jobs and education! Sexism? Solve it with jobs and education! The thing is, he was standing onstage next to arguably the most privileged woman in the world, who is also subjected to arguably the most relentless misogyny in the world. She doesn't need a job or a free college education. She needs her whole humanity respected, and breaking up the banks won't make that happen.
3. Clinton takes strong issue with this approach. Her closing statement was, frankly, killer:
We agree that we've got to get unaccountable money out of politics. We agree that Wall Street should never be allowed to wreck Main Street again.BOOM.
But here's the point I want to make tonight: I am not a single-issue candidate, and I do not believe we live in a single-issue country. I think that a lot of what we have to overcome to break down the barriers that are holding people back, whether it's poison in the water of the children of Flint, or whether it's the poor miners who are being left out and left behind in coal country, or whether it is any other American today who feels somehow put down and oppressed by racism, by sexism, by discrimination against the LGBT community, against the kind of efforts that need to be made to root out all of these barriers, that's what I want to take on.
And here in Wisconsin, I want to reiterate: We've got to stand up for unions and working people who have been at the core [applause] of the American middle class, and who are being attacked by ideologues, by demagogues. Yes, does Wall Street and big financial interests, along with drug companies, insurance companies, Big Oil, all of it, have too much influence? You're right!
But if we were to stop that tomorrow, we would still have the indifference, the negligence, that we saw in Flint. We would still have racism holding people back. We would still have sexism preventing women from getting equal pay. We would still have LGBT people who get married on Saturday and get fired on Monday. And we would still have governors like Scott Walker and others trying to rip out the heart of the middle class by making it impossible to organize and stand up for better wages and working conditions.
So I'm going to keep talking about tearing down all the barriers that stand in the way of Americans fulfilling their potential, because I don't think our country can live up to its potential unless we give a chance to every single American to live up to theirs. [cheers and applause]
There's another Democratic debate tonight, which will take place in Milwaukee and will be moderated by PBS NewsHour anchors Gwen Ifill and Judy Woodruff. The debate will be simulcast on PBS and CNN.
It will be streamed on the PBS NewsHour website and on CNN.com.
So, here's a thread for discussion!
Copyright 2009 Shakesville. Powered by Blogger. Blogger Showcase
Blogger Templates created by Deluxe Templates. Wordpress by K2