Primarily Speaking

image of a blue bus with TRUMP and MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN painted on the side, to which I've added text reading: 'No losers may board this classy bus.'

Today in TRUMP news, here's just a terrific headline: "An Iowa surprise: Donald Trump is actually trying to win." Hahahaha! Hey, listen: Sometimes when you put on a red clown nose and giant clown shoes just for a laugh, you realize you were born to be a bozo.

[Content Note: War; death] Former Florida Governor Jeb Bush sums up the Iraq War disaster thus: "I'll tell you, taking out Saddam Hussein turned out to be a pretty good deal." Oh did it? For whom? For the millions of dead, injured, and/or displaced Iraqis? For the thousands of dead or wounded US troops? For IS? I mean, I know it was a "pretty good deal" for your war profiteer buddies, but anyone else?

Dr. Jen Gunter follows up on her report on Dr. Ben Carson using fetal tissue in research, despite his criticism of the practice. The truth is, what this shows is that using fetal tissue in research is, in fact, incredibly common, and hardly the grotesque scandal that anti-choicers would have us believe.

Meanwhile, on the other side of the aisle, [CN: Video autoplays at link] here is a transcript of Hillary Clinton's interview with Univision, in which she's not so much "hiding from the press" as she is "answering a lot of direct questions," and she hammers home once again that Trump is not an outlier of his gross party, but perfectly centered within its horrible platform of terrible ideas.

In other news, Nate Cohn investigates whether Clinton is really in danger of losing the Democratic primary.

If you've any doubt who the Democratic frontrunner really is, at least for the moment, here is a screenshot of just a part of the conservative National Review's current front page:

screenshot of headlines at the National Review, to which I've added arrows pointing to SIX headlines about Hillary Clinton

I didn't think any conservative could talk about Clinton more than Carly Fiorina, but I was sorely mistaken!

A lot of the conservative coverage of Bernie Sanders, of which there is significantly less than of Clinton, centers around the fact that he's "weird." Which is, I guess, the best (ahem) they can do, since they can't dog-whistle his gender or race or sexuality. Still: It's gross. You're telling me conservatives can't find meaningful policy disagreements with socialist Bernie Sanders, and criticize him on that basis? For fuck's sake.

And finally today: "Supporters of Al Gore have begun a round of conversations among themselves and with the former vice president about his running for president in 2016, the latest sign that top Democrats have serious doubts that Hillary Clinton is a sure thing." Of course.

Everyone else who was running yesterday is still running today. Even Rick Perry.

Talk about these things! Or don't. Whatever makes you happy. Life is short.

Open Wide...

Wow

This is a big day:

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry arrived in Cuba on Friday to raise the U.S. flag at the recently restored American Embassy in Havana, another symbolic step in improved relations between the two Cold War-era foes.

The ceremony, raising the flag over the building for the first time in 54 years, will come nearly four weeks after the United States and Cuba formally renewed diplomatic relations and upgraded their diplomatic missions to embassies.

While the Cubans celebrated with a flag-raising in Washington on July 20, the Americans waited until Kerry could travel to Havana.

...Kerry, the first U.S. secretary of state to visit Cuba in 70 years, will be accompanied by aides, members of Congress and three U.S. Marines who last lowered the flag there in January 1961.
Amazing.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of different colored Vespa scooters

Hosted by Vespas.

This week's Open Threads have been brought to you by the letter V.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Which celebrity do you think seems like someone with whom you'd be friends in real life? I don't mean which celebrity you'd most want to be friends with, based on what you know of them; I mean instead the person(s) you've seen/read in interviews who reminds you of people you know and wouldn't seem out of place in your circle.

Probably Jim Gaffigan. No coincidence, since we grew up in towns next door to one another, lol.

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime



Guns N' Roses: "November Rain"

Open Wide...

Good News

[Content Note: Death penalty.]

Tenatively good news, anyway:

After a sweeping two-year review, the state Supreme Court outlawed capital punishment in Connecticut Thursday, saying the state's death penalty no longer comports with evolved societal values and serves no valid purpose as punishment.

The 4-3 decision would remove 11 convicts from Connecticut's death row and overturn the latest iteration of the state's death penalty, a political compromise effective April 2012 that halted executions going forward but allowed death sentences to be imposed on the inmates already sentenced.
The decision, however, was not unanimous, and was, expectedly, met with lots of pushback from death penalty proponents. The state legislature may try to find a way to reinstate it. Which is just unimaginably cruel to the prisoners who are being removed from death row. But there you go. Advocates for the death penalty aren't exactly known for their compassion.

I don't mean that to sound flippant about that. I have immense sympathy for people whose loved ones have been murdered and who feel that the only befitting punishment is the death penalty. It's just, you know, 139 people have been exonerated from death row in my lifetime. (And that statistic is now five years old, so it's certainly gone up since.) Even if one doesn't have any qualms about state-sanctioned killing of murderers, I'm pretty sure we all have qualms about killing innocent people who have been wrongly convicted.

And the only way to keep supporting the death penalty is to pretend those people don't exist.

They do.

Open Wide...

Good Grief

Shorter George Will: "The Republican Party has spent decades trying to convince the US electorate through a combination of carefully crafted rhetoric, misdirections, scapegoating, and outright lies that our conservatism is 'intellectually respectable and politically palatable,' and now Donald Trump is RUINING IT by being all honest about how grotesque our policies are! BOO HOO!"

That column would be fucking hilarious, if it weren't so aggressively contemptible.

Open Wide...

Fat Fashion

This is your semi-regular thread in which fat women can share pix, make recommendations for clothes they love, ask questions of other fat women about where to locate certain plus-size items, share info about sales, talk about what jeans cut at what retailer best fits their body shapes, discuss how to accessorize neutral colored suits, share stories of going bare-armed for the first time, brag about a cool fashion moment, whatever.

* * *

image of me standing in my bathroom, taking a selfie in the mirror, wearing a t-shirt with the cast of Wizard of Oz of whom Dorothy is taking a selfie

Wizard of Oz Selfie Raglan Tee from Torrid.

Y'all know how I feel about about selfies, so of course I love this shirt and had to have it. I waited for a sale (actually it was the day of the last Fat Fashion thread!) and then I made it mine! Yay!

It was the first thing I'd bought in quite some time, and I'm happy not only to have a quirky tee with a graphic on it that I love, but also one that's three-quarters sleeve. I loooooove three-quarters sleeve tees.

Anyway! As always, all subjects related to fat fashion are on topic, but if you want a topic for discussion: What's your favorite graphic t-shirt?

Have at it in comments! Please remember to make fat women of all sizes, especially women who find themselves regularly sizing out of standard plus-size lines, welcome in this conversation, and pass no judgment on fat women who want to and/or feel obliged, for any reason, to conform to beauty standards. And please make sure if you're soliciting advice, you make it clear you're seeking suggestions—and please be considerate not to offer unsolicited advice. Sometimes people just need to complain and want solidarity, not solutions.

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Sophie the Torbie Cat, sitting on my chest with her face right in front of the camera, with Zelda the Black and Tan Mutt chilling beside me in the background

Me: Aww, Zelly looks so cute right now; I'll take a picture of her.

Zelly: La la la la it's a day la la la la.

Sophie: OH HELLO MAYBE YOU COULD JUST PET ME INSTEAD BECAUSE HERE I AM.

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

Primarily Speaking

image of Joe Biden, squinching one eye and giving a slight grin, to which I've added text reading: 'Maybe!'

Let's start with the Democrats today, shall we? WE SHALL!

Vice President Joe Biden still hasn't made up his mind about whether he's going to run for president. He will reportedly be "using part of his vacation in South Carolina this week to sound out friends and family about a presidential bid, as some Democrats press him to enter the race and give the party another option in the face of lingering controversies involving Hillary Clinton."

Sure. Because why would her party stand behind Hillary Clinton? It's not like she's been one of the most respected and admired politicians around the entire globe for decades or anything.

And I say that as someone who has criticized her lack of transparency on this very issue. But I am also keenly aware of the fact that it isn't because people give a shit about compliance with the Federal Records Act, unless people have suddenly developed an inexplicable fondness for it in the last eight years, that Clinton is getting so much shit about her email usage, but because there are people who want to do anything to derail her campaign. And that is some bullshit.

I'm just totally grossed out generally by the whole "Biden should run as spoiler and/or back-up for Clinton" thing. If Biden should run, those reasons need to be because of the things Biden brings to the table that no other candidate does, not because there are a whole lot of people who hate Clinton, or are ready to throw her to the proverbial wolves at the first sign of trouble. And guess what? I know people who have legitimate criticisms of Clinton and who want Biden to run because they like him for this or that. They can clearly articulate those reasons. And none of them are: "Clinton is an icky ladyperson." Not even deeply coded variations.

Like for example: "Email scandal that no one would care about if it were anyone else, which we know for certain because no one ever has, even when it was a sitting president and his entire disgusting administration."

In other news, Greg Howard explains why Bernie Sanders' approach to racial justice is deeply flawed, which will probably sound familiar:
Sanders and his plan to save blacks through redistributing wealth to narrow the wealth gap are deeply flawed, because the principle which serves as the scaffolding for his plan is deeply flawed. Sanders—like many other liberals of his race and age—believes that capitalism is inherently evil, and so that all evils can be ascribed to those of capitalism, and so in the idea that economic injustice is the root of all injustice. Racial injustice, in this reading, is treated as a side effect or function of economic injustice; concomitantly, racial inequality is treated as having the same causes and therefore the same solutions as economic inequality. If wealth is redistributed, the idea goes, then poor people of all races will have more money; then something else will happen; then racism will not matter or be healed altogether. I, and many in Black Lives Matter, and other people, too, believe that this line of theorizing has things backward.

I, and other people, too, tend to believe that racial injustice is different from economic injustice; that black Americans are poor because of racism, more than that racism is the result of black Americans being poor; and, further, that racism is the driving force behind the capricious and fluid idea of race. It is racism that has led to layers upon layers of policy that keep blacks as a social underclass being conceived and executed; racism that has led to policies like redlining, which still exist, in various forms, today; racism that has led to things like segregated neighborhoods and schools; racism that has led to millions upon millions of minorities today being corralled in ghettos; and racism that has led to the average white household having 16 times the wealth of the average black one in 2015. Black people aren't systemically oppressed because they don't have money; they don't have money because they are systemically oppressed, because the American voting public is in favor of them being so.
Note to presidential candidates: "Single most important issue" and intersectional analysis will always be fundamentally irreconcilable. In the same way that 1 and 3 will always be different numbers.

Martin O'Malley, Lincoln Chafee, and Jim Webb continue to run for president.

Moving along to the other side of aisle, the big news is that all seventeen candidates are maintaining maximum levels of undiluted terrible! But here are some highlights:

[CN: War] This is the nicest headline you will ever see about Jeb Bush trying to blame the failure of the Iraq War on President Barack Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, instead of on his dirtbag brother: "Jeb Bush offered inaccurate version of Iraq war history." Hahahaha he sure did!

[CN: War on agency] Dr. Jen Gunter hands Dr. Ben Carson a can of BOOM! by reporting that he did research on 17 week fetal tissue. Whoooooooops!

[CN: War on agency] Senator Marco Rubio wants you to sign a petition if you know that a human embryo "won't become a donkey or a cat." PROOF THAT LIFE BEGINS AT CONCEPTION! HUMAN EMBRYOS CAN'T BECOME CATS! CASE CLOSED, YOUR HONOR!

[CN: Child abuse; sexual assault; misogyny] There aren't even fucking words: "A Republican lawmaker in Arkansas will no longer be given a 'Power of Courage' award at an event headlined by presidential hopeful Sen. Ted Cruz Wednesday after a controversy arose because he re-homed two adopted girls to a man now serving a 40-year sentence for crimes against children. State representative Justin Harris, also the owner and founder of Growing God's Kingdom Preschool, and his wife adopted two girls in 2013 but then gave them to another family, where one of the children was sexually abused. ...Harris, the Times reported, 'said that the girls, then ages 3 and 5, were dangerously violent and had posed a threat to his biological sons.'" Because he believed them to be demonically possessed. Really. And since Republicans are supercool: "Harris will still receive the award but not at the event Cruz will attend." Cruz's team asked them not to present the award at the event in which he'd be in attendance, but didn't suggest maybe just maybe that award shouldn't be presented at all.

Professor of Bible Bigotry Mike Huckabee says you should vote for him so he can put the EPA out of business: "Let's let the states decide when it's a mud puddle and when it's a wetland." This fucking guy.

[CN: Vine autoplays at link] Here's the best thing that Donald Trump has ever said! Mesmerizing!

Pugilist Chris Christie, corporate power-failure Carly Fiorina, real person Jim Gilmore, reasonable-by-comparison Lindsey Graham, nerdiest clown Bobby Jindal, "moderate" John Kasich, charisma void George Pataki, proximate apple Rand Paul, trainwreck Rick Perry, waking nightmare Rick Santorum, and Indiana dumpster diver Scott Walker continue to run for president.

Talk about these things! Or don't. Whatever makes you happy. Life is short.

Open Wide...

This Is Awful

[Content Note: Transmisogyny; carcerality.]

Chelsea Manning, currently serving a 35-year prison sentence at the US Disciplinary Barracks at Ft. Leavenworth, Kansas, for espionage, now faces "indefinite solitary confinement after being charged with having prohibited materials in prison, one of her lawyers told BuzzFeed News on Wednesday."

ACLU attorney Chase Strangio told BuzzFeed News that he is yet to see the charging document — and BuzzFeed News has not reviewed any documentation of the new charges. An Army spokesman did not respond to a request for the charging document and comment on the charges.

...Strangio noted that the charges have been brought against Manning by military officials at the prison and stated that Manning will have a hearing on the charges on August 18.

"Here Chelsea is at risk of losing various support networks simply because she had an expired tube of toothpaste, the Vanity Fair magazine that featured Caitlyn Jenner and requested a lawyer when she felt she was being accused of misconduct," Strangio told BuzzFeed News of the charges.

...Among the materials that DiPasquale told BuzzFeed News were confiscated from Manning are The Advocate and Out magazines; an issue of Cosmopolitan with an interview of Manning; Transgender Studies Quarterly; and a novel about transgender issues, A Safe Girl to Love.

According to the petition, the alleged misconduct that led to Manning requesting to speak with her lawyer related to her "sweeping some food onto the floor." The petition states that a charge of "improper medicine use" resulted from Manning having the expired tube of toothpaste.

"Given the materials that were confiscated, it is concerning that the military and Leavenworth might be taking action for the purpose of chilling Chelsea's speech or even with the goal of silencing her altogether by placing her in solitary," Strangio wrote. "Hopefully with public scrutiny the prison will respond by dismissing these charges and ensuring that she is not unfairly targeted based on her activism, her identity, and her pending lawsuit."
The list of charges, which are absolutely absurd, is included in this petition to the government requesting Manning not be relegated to indefinite solitary confinement, which should be, by any reasonable definition, cruel and unusal punishment for any crime, no less minor violations like contraband and "disrespect."

Fuck this.

Open Wide...

In the News

Here is some stuff in the news today...

[Content Note: Industrial accident; death; injury; video autoplays at link] Multiple explosions at the site of hazardous chemical warehouses in the northern Chinese port city of Tianjin has killed at least 50 people and injured at least 500 more, 71 of whom are in critical condition. Twelve of the dead include firefighters, and dozens of firefighters are among the countless people still missing. "The first explosion was huge, but the second was even more powerful—the equivalent of 21 metric tons of TNT or a magnitude 2.9 earthquake, according to the China Earthquake Networks Center." The blasts destroyed homes in the area and shattered glass in a wide radius. Rescue teams are still searching for survivors in the rubble. Absolutely devastating.

[CN: Bombing; terrorism; death; injury] In Baghdad, a truck bomb set off near a popular food market in a predominantly Shiite neighborhood has killed at least 67 people and injured more "in one of the deadliest single blasts in the Iraqi capital in years. The Islamic State group [who are Sunni militants] claimed responsibility for the explosion, saying it targeted a gathering place of Shiites and vowed more such attacks." Fucking hell.

[CN: Illness] Former President Jimmy Carter, 90, has disclosed that he has cancer: "Recent liver surgery revealed that I have cancer that now is in other parts of my body. I will be rearranging my schedule as necessary so I can undergo treatment by physicians at Emory Healthcare. A more complete public statement will be made when facts are known, possibly next week." I wish him the best for whatever he wants along this journey, whether that is to aggressively pursue treatment, or to just be comfortable for as long as possible, or anything in between.

[CN: Sexual violence; description of sexual assaults at link] Three more women have come forward with accounts of being sexually assaulted by Bill Cosby, bringing the total number of women making allegations to nearly 50.

[CN: Racism; video autoplays at link] This is a terrific piece by Van Jones on the importance of #BlackLivesMatter activists disrupting the Democrats, the importance of meaningful policy for black people, and the importance of black people to Democratic candidates, if they want to win.

[CN: Carcerality] Here is a good read on Chicagoland's Cook County Jail's urban farming project. I am exceedingly anti-prison at this point, but, as long as we're stuck with the current criminal model, I'd prefer to see way more of these programs.

[CN: Police brutality; racism] Janelle Monáe, y'all: "Singer-songwriter and producer Janelle Monáe led a rally and march in support of the Black Lives Matter movement in Philadelphia on Wednesday. She was joined by rapper and Wondaland Records labelmate Jidenna, as she addressed the crowd of gathered protestors. 'They say a question lives forever, until it gets the answer it deserves,' Monáe said. 'Won't you say their names? Can we say their names right now? Can we speak their names, as long as we have breath in our bodies?'...Before playing a gig later on Wednesday evening, Monáe and Jidenna led chants of the names of black women and men who have died either in police custody or during altercations with the police."

[CN: Homophobia] "U.S. District Judge David Bunning has ruled that [Rowan County, Kentucky clerk Kim Davis] must comply with the Supreme Court's decision that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide and that her personal religious beliefs do not supersede her oath of office." Good.

This is a really interesting and touching article about how people who take their ill pets for experimental treatments are contributing to medical advances for humans. "[Dr. Nicola Mason] says she never imagined when she was getting into veterinary medicine that she'd be helping people. Now, she says it's the way medicine should be practiced: 'It's a two for one approach.'" Blub.

And finally! Pit bull in a ball pit! ADORBZ!!!

Open Wide...

"How can I be safe in America if I can’t be safe in my body?"

[Content Note: Police brutality; racism; death; terrorism.]

This piece by Charles M. Blow for the New York Times is so, so good: Police Abuse Is a Form of Terror:

State violence, as epitomized in these cases by what people view as police abuses, conversely, has produced a specific feeling of terror, one that is inescapable and unavoidable.

The difference in people's reactions to these different kinds of killings isn't about an exaltation — or exploitation — of some deaths above others for political purposes, but rather a collective outrage that the people charged with protecting your life could become a threat to it. It is a reaction to the puncturing of an illusion, the implosion of an idea. How can I be safe in America if I can’t be safe in my body? It is a confrontation with a most discomforting concept: that there is no amount of righteous behavior, no neighborhood right enough, to produce sufficient security.

It produces a particular kind of terror, a feeling of nakedness and vulnerability, a fear that makes people furious at the very idea of having to be afraid.

The reaction to police killings is to my mind not completely dissimilar to people's reaction to other forms of terrorism.

The very ubiquity of police officers and the power they possess means that the questionable killing in which they are involved creates a terror that rolls in like a fog, filling every low place. It produces ambient, radiant fear. It is the lurking unpredictability of it. It is the any- and everywhere-ness of it.
Blow likens this to "America's reaction to foreign terror," which I think is an apt comparison. And I think there are all kinds of ways that non-black marginalized people can recognize a similar sort of terror in their own lives, conveyed by virtue of the ubiquity of a particular kind of violence that targets people like them, e.g. the rape culture, which we can use for the internal work of bridge-building toward understanding.

But as Blow notes, the difference is this is state-sponsored terrorism. It is happening with the full force of the state behind it, usually protecting the perpetrators of this violence.

It is the people who are ostensibly meant to be protectors, whose actions instead terrorize.

Go read the whole thing.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of a Visla, a brown, short-haired, floppy-eared dog breed

Hosted by a Visla.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Suggested by Shaker everestmckinley: "What was your most recent new-to-you experience? Could be a place you visited, a food you ate, a new friend, etc."

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

[Content Note: War on agency.]

"I would have a Justice Department that would begin to criminally prosecute Planned Parenthood for violating federal law and selling body parts. ...I would also invoke the 15th and Fourteenth Amendments. This is the power that we have to stop this incredible, barbaric scourge of abortion. Not just stop funding Planned Parenthood, but we need to invoke the Fifth and 14th Amendment. The Fifth Amendment guarantees due process for every person. The 14th Amendment guarantees equal protection under the law for every person. ...I would take [the position that unborn children are people, guaranteeing them Fifth and 14th Amendment rights]. I would act on behalf of those unborn children, and I would let those who want to slaughter babies, those who want to sell their body parts, let them sue me."—Professor of Bible Bigotry and Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee, explaining how he would shut down Planned Parenthood and criminalize abortion if he were elected president.

Again, this is less like chipping away at Roe and more like taking a bulldozer to it.

I have said many times (for instance) that fetuses are valued more highly than the people who carry them, that the potential life of every fetus is more important than the actual life of a pregnant person. Never has this been more clear.

If Mike Huckabee, or any of his fellow Republican candidates, had their way, fetuses would have not equivalent rights, but more rights than any pregnant person.

Protip, Huckabee: "Slaughtering babies" is already against the law.

Open Wide...

Harrumph

[Content Note: Nationalism.]

This morning, Donald Trump tweeted that his campaign store is finally open, and I regret to inform you that it is surprisingly disappointing.

No gold toilet lapel pin, no White House miniature with Trump logo, no NOT A LOSER hats. No gold bootstraps. No gold parachutes. No bankruptcy paperwork printed on Trump-branded US flag stationery. What is this shop even for?

Y'all, I literally can't even find one item with CLASSY embroidered on it with gold thread in the Trump presidential merch shop.

All it is is a bunch of crappy t-shirts and hats with "Make America Great Again" printed on 'em. If you want to "Make America Great Again," start with your own merch shop, sir!

I'm beginning to think this Trump character isn't even serious about running for president.

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime

[Content Note: There are quick edits and camera flashes in this video.]



Right Said Fred: "I'm Too Sexy"

Open Wide...

Whut.

As I mentioned yesterday, Harvard professor and Creative Commons founder Lawrence Lessig has announed he's considering a run for the presidency on the Democratic ticket.

His plan is to "run as a 'referendum candidate' in the Democratic primaries if the party's leading candidates did not commit to making campaign financing reform their top priority if elected president. ...The 'referendum president,' Lessig said, would remain in office just long enough to enact financing reform before stepping aside in favor of the vice-president."

Today, I find this tidbit buried in an article about how Lessig's potential run may affect Bernie Sanders' campaign:

Comparing his potential candidacy to that of Eugene McCarthy's 1968 run and "citizen equality" to the Vietnam War, he said the success of the rest of the progressive agenda, including gun control and climate change, depends on passage of a reform package called Citizen Equality Act of 2017, which would change the way elections are funded and districts are drawn.

When asked about his potential candidacy taking away donations and eventually votes from Sanders, who has been gaining momentum in the past few months, Lessig stressed that because — if elected — he plans to resign and leave the presidency to his vice president as soon as the Citizen Equality Act is passed, Sanders could still end up as president.

"What I would argue is that a regular candidate is an either-or proposal, what I'm talking about is an and — Lessig and Hillary or Lessig and Bernie. One would break up the corrupted system, and the other would benefit from it.

"Ideally, I would resign in a day," he said.
Not to put too fine a point on it, but "chang[ing] the way elections are funded and districts are drawn," which are absolutely necessary things that need to happen, is a monumental task. We're talking about legislation that would fundamentally reinvent how politics work in the United States.

And, Maude knows, my entire life revolves around participating in monumental tasks—political and social change ain't easy—so I'm not suggesting that just because it's an intimidatingly difficult task it shouldn't be attempted and doesn't need to start somewhere.

The point is that casually suggesting that such seismic legislation could (or ever would) be passed in a day is manifestly absurd. Or a week. Or a month.

I know Lessig is a smart man. I know he understands how government works in the United States. The president doesn't wave a magic wand and shazam comprehensive legislation into existence. A reform package like the one he's proposing would have to go through Congress. You know—that profoundly gridlocked legislative body which is so compromised by polarization they can barely get shit done.

One of the concerns I have seen raised about a theoretical Sanders presidency is that he won't be able to get any of his policy proposals though a Congress that is almost universally more conservative than he is. Which is a legitimate concern with any progressive candidate, hence the necessity of any president with even modest progressive proposals needing an abundance of diplomatic and negotiating skills to work with an obstinate Congress.

I don't know if Sanders has the requisite skills, and I believe Clinton and O'Malley do, but I am certain that all three of them know how the fuck government works, and none of them would be daft enough to suggest that a major overhaul of our entire electoral system is likely to pass Congress in a day, in this universe or any other.

What Lessig is proposing is a lie. And it is a lie that plays on the naivete of voters who really don't understand how politics works, particularly young and/or newly-engaged idealists who have a misconception that what a presidential candidate promises, a president can definitely achieve.

That is: The very voters to whom Lessig is appealing.

What happens if Lessig gets elected (lol) and then the Citizen Equality Act doesn't pass immediately? Or at all? Does he just stay president, or does he resign in disgrace, or what? What's the contingency plan for this radical one-day presidency if it turns out that the (currently and possibly future) Republican Congressional majority doesn't immediately agree to radically alter the corrupt political landscape which they've spent the last four decades building to give themselves an advantage?

This isn't serious politics.

And the worst thing about it is that this sort of gimmicky bullshit only further entrenches the increasing unseriousness of presidential electioneering.

Yes, I get it: A detailed student debt relief plan, for example, isn't as sexy or exciting as "FREE COLLEGE FOR EVERYONE!" But nothing makes an electorate more jaded, more quickly, than making promises one can't possibly keep, no matter how brilliant and decent and right those ideas are.

This is a stunt. And we've got enough stunts and pranksters and straight-up dipshits in this presidential race already.

More than enough.

Open Wide...

The Wednesday Blogaround

This blogaround brought to you by aluminum.

Recommended Reading:

Digby: [Content Note: Militarism; war] Misunderestimating the Surge

Nina: [CN: War on agency] U.S. House Urges Obama to Reinterpret Strict Abortion Rule

Jenny: [CN: Fat hatred/shaming] The Time Has Come: #StopTheShame

Rin: [CN: Privilege; worker exploitation] Push Me Until I Break: The Effects of Unrealistic Expectations on Marginalized Workers in Tech

Fannie: [CN: Homophobia] Equality Opponents Try to Keep Debate Alive

Kenrya: [CN: Misogynoir] Serena Williams Covers New York Magazine, Talks Racism and Sexism

Ria: [CN: Moving GIFs at link] The Best Meteor Shower of the Year Is Tonight, and Here's How to Watch it

Leave your links and recommendations in comments. Self-promotion welcome and encouraged!

Open Wide...