Good Stuff

[Content Note: Homophobia.]

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has ruled that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 bars sexual orientation-based employment discrimination, which is a huge win for lesbian, gay, and bisexual workers in the US:

"[A]llegations of discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation necessarily state a claim of discrimination on the basis of sex," the commission concluded in a decision dated July 15.

...While the EEOC had been pushing toward today's decision with cases and even field guidance addressing coverage under Title VII of specific types of discrimination faced by gay people, the July 15 decision states that "sexual orientation is inherently a 'sex-based consideration.'"

In reviewing courts' prior interpretation of the words of Title VII, the commission acknowledged plainly that sexual orientation itself is not listed as a type of discrimination barred in the 1964 law.

"[T]he question is not whether sexual orientation is explicitly listed in Title VII as a prohibited basis for employment actions. It is not," the commission found. Instead, the commission stated that the question is the same as in any other Title VII sex discrimination case: "whether the agency has 'relied on sex-based considerations' or 'take[n] gender into account' when taking the challenged employment action."

The commission found that sexual orientation discrimination is sex discrimination for several reasons. Among the reasons, the commission stated, is because sexual orientation discrimination "necessarily entails treating an employee less favorably because of the employee's sex" and "because it is associational discrimination on the basis of sex."

After a review of the case law regarding similar challenges to employment practices alleging a violation of Title VII where the initial understanding of the law would not have included that coverage, the commission stated, "The courts have gone where the principles of Title VII have directed."

"Our task is the same," the decision found. "We therefore conclude that Complainant's allegations of discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation state a claim of discrimination on the basis of sex. We further conclude that allegations of discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation necessarily state a claim of discrimination on the basis of sex."

Tico Almeida, the head of Freedom to Work, celebrated the decision — and urged LGBT groups to go to the courts to seek codification of the ruling.

"Freedom to Work applauds this historic decision by the EEOC, and we encourage gay men, lesbians, and bisexuals who face harassment or discrimination on the job to consult an attorney and file Title VII claims with the EEOC and eventually the federal courts," he said. "Our LGBT movement should take this strongly reasoned legal victory and run with it by returning to the federal courts to win workplace protections in all fifty states.
Although EEOC decisions "are given significant deference by federal courts," ultimately "only the Supreme Court could issue a definitive ruling on the interpretation," which is why Freedom to Work, and other advocacy groups, are urging soliciting federal court rulings.

The EEOC, like every other federal agency, doesn't exist or operate in a vacuum: "All Commission seats and the post of general counsel to the commission are filled by the President of the U.S., subject to confirmation by the Senate." Unless, of course, the Senate is full of obstructionist shitlords, in which case the President can make recess appointments, which is what President Obama has done. And he chose people who were inclined to favorably interpret existing civil rights law to protect LGB employees.

This is a big win in an ongoing battle. Yay!

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of a robin redbreast

Hosted by a robin.

This week's Open Threads have been brought to you by the letter R.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Do you enjoy baths?

Immersing myself in water is one of my greatest joys: I love swimming and find it so restorative. But I loathe baths. They are the opposite of relaxing for me. I feel like I'm sitting in a stew of my own filth and I just want to take a shower ASAP. All it takes is for one hair to float by and IT'S ALL OVER, lol.

You?

Open Wide...

Your Best Photograph

After our first "Your Best Photograph" thread, some of y'all said you'd like to see this become a regular feature, and so it shall be! If you're a photographer, even if a very amateur one (like myself), and you've got a photo or photos you'd like to share outside of those categories, here's a thread for that.

It doesn't really have to be your best photograph—just one you like!

Please be sure if your photo contains people other than yourself, that you have the explicit consent of the people in the photos before posting them.

* * *

Here's one I took recently of a weather-worn white picket fence that I quite like:

image of a weather-worn white picket fence on an overcast day

Open Wide...

Yup

[Content Note: War on agency; anti-choice fuckery.]

Here is my pal Andrea Grimes just being so smart on Planned Parenthood and the CMP video: "Abortion Is a Necessary Social Good; Edited Videos and False Accusations Don't Change That."

I'm not even going to excerpt it. Just go read the whole darn thing.

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime



Heart: "Crazy on You"

Open Wide...

Welp

[Content Note: Climate change.]

Suzanne Goldenberg for the Guardian: "Warming of oceans due to climate change is unstoppable, say US scientists."

The warming of the oceans due to climate change is now unstoppable after record temperatures last year, bringing additional sea-level rise, and raising the risks of severe storms, US government climate scientists said on Thursday.

The annual State of the Climate in 2014 report, based on research from 413 scientists from 58 countries, found record warming on the surface and upper levels of the oceans, especially in the North Pacific, in line with earlier findings of 2014 as the hottest year on record.

Global sea-level also reached a record high, with the expansion of those warming waters, keeping pace with the 3.2 ± 0.4 mm per year trend in sea level growth over the past two decades, the report said.

Scientists said the consequences of those warmer ocean temperatures would be felt for centuries to come – even if there were immediate efforts to cut the carbon emissions fuelling changes in the oceans.

"I think of it more like a fly wheel or a freight train. It takes a big push to get it going but it is moving now and will continue to move long after we continue to pushing it," Greg Johnson, an oceanographer at Noaa's Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, told a conference call with reporters.

"Even if we were to freeze greenhouse gases at current levels, the sea would actually continue to warm for centuries and millennia, and as they continue to warm and expand the sea levels will continue to rise," Johnson said.
And while timeframes described in "centuries and millennia" may seem like an excuse to be indifferent to climate change now, the reality is that the warming and rising of the oceans even in small increments now is underwriting the increasing severity of storms and the heat waves which are already causing displacement and death in many parts of the world.

I am anything but indifferent to climate change, but I remain pessimistic about generating the collective resolve to meaningfully address it.

Open Wide...

Shooting in Chattanooga

[Content Note: Guns; shooting; possible terrorism.]

An unidentified gunman armed with numerous weapons "brutally and brazenly attacked" two military facilities in Chattanooga, Tennessee, today, killing four people and wounding others. The gunman is dead, although it is not clear whether he took his own life or was killed by someone else.

The shooting began about 10:45 a.m. at one recruiting center on Lee Highway in and ended about 30 minutes later at the facility on Amnicola Highway, where all of the deaths occurred, officials said at the news conference. Photographs of the Amnicola facility showed the windows riddled with bullet holes.

The United States attorney Bill Killian said that federal investigators would take the lead on the case, which he initially called an "act of domestic terrorism" before backing away, saying that the investigation would determine how the crime should be labeled.
My condolences to the family, friends, and colleagues of those who were killed.

I will update this post with additional information as it becomes available.

UPDATE 1: [CN: Video may autoplay at link] CBS News has identified the shooter as Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez. I haven't found a second source for that yet, so it should definitely be considered preliminary and unconfirmed information.

UPDATE 2: [CN: Video may autoplay at link] CNN is now also identifying the shooter as Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez, citing "two sources briefed on the case," as is NBC News, who also report that he is a "naturalized U.S. citizen from Kuwait." Department of Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson cautions in a statement "at this time, there are many unconfirmed and possibly false reports about events."

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Zelda the Black and Tan Mutt lying on the loveseat with her chin on a pillow
Zelly, being ridiculously adorbz, as usual.

Iain and I brought Zelda home from the shelter four years ago today. I can't believe it's been that long already! This little mutt has brought so much joy and silliness and snuggling into our lives. And I will be forever grateful that she is here to remind me, every day, especially the difficult ones, that "It's a day!" ♥

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

In the News

Here is some stuff in the news today...

[Content Note: White supremacy; racist eliminationist violence; white privilege] The New York Times has a profile of Dylann Roof, who killed nine black women and men in South Carolina last month, and it is utterly sickening the treatment this murderous white supremacist man is given compared to the black boys who are murdered at the hands of police. Instead of Roof's life and background being mined for evidence of his criminality, it's all "this poor white kid who totally had black friends but also a troubled life." This is the opening paragraph, for fuck's sake: "The young man accused of the terrible crime was a bug-eyed boy with a bowl haircut who came from a broken home and attended at least seven schools in nine years. Many afternoons he would sit silently on the curb in front of his roomy yard and, when he tired of it, move to a different curb. He helped neighbors with their yard work, but they still found him strange." BOO FUCKING HOO. If you would like to submit a complaint to the New York Times' public editor, Margaret Sullivan, you can email her here.

Way to go, Ireland! "Ireland yesterday became the fourth country in the world to allow transgender people to have their gender legally recognized based on self-declaration... Under the new legislation, people who wish to have their change of gender recognised by the state will simply make a formal declaration of their 'settled and solemn intention' to do so. ...Noting that the legislation was 'not perfect' because it excludes 'those under 18, non-binary people and people with an intersex condition,' Sara Phillips, chair of the Transgender Equality Network Ireland, said: 'This legislation marks an incredible shift in Irish society. Our community is finally stepping out of the shadows.'"

Here is just a real headline in the world today: "John McCain has a few things to say about Donald Trump." I can hardly think of anything I'd rather read less! But if you want to read it, for reasons I will probably never understand no matter how many times you explain it to me, here you go!

[CN: Rape culture; child sex abuse; video may autoplay at link] TLC has finally canceled 19 Kids and Counting two months after it was disclosed that Josh Duggar molested multiple girls. But that doesn't mean they've severed ties with the Duggar family, who are a major money-making machine for them: "TLC also announced it has teamed with two prominent child-protection organizations for an ongoing campaign to raise awareness about child sexual abuse. The multi-platform initiative will begin with a one-hour, commercial-free documentary likely airing in late August, the network said. It will include the participation of Jill and Jessa Duggar, two of the sisters Josh Duggar touched inappropriately, as well as other survivors and families affected by such abuse." Perfect. "We look forward to working with TLC on this upcoming special documentary and hope that it is an encouragement to many," said "the Duggar family" in a statement. I'll bet.

[CN: Discussion of transphobia, bullying, and self-harm; video may autoplay at link] Caitlyn Jenner gave her acceptance speech for the 2015 Arthur Ashe Award for Courage at last night's ESPYs. "If you want to call me names, make jokes, doubt my intentions, go ahead, because the reality is, I can take it. But for the thousands of kids out there coming to terms with being true to who they are, they shouldn't have to take it." Watch the video and/or read the transcript here.

More Pluto news! Give it to me! Give me all the Pluto news!!! "Latest New Horizons Images Show Pluto's Moons, Ice Mountains." I literally cannot get enough Pluto news! I know that sounds sarcastic, but it isn't! I am super excited!

Know what else I love? Pentaquark news! "Pentaquarks Have Scientists Psyched—and Baffled." I imagine that if I were a scientist, "psyched and baffled" would be my favorite state of being. I'm frankly a pretty big fan of it even not being a scientist.

OMG this video of San Francisco Board of Supervisors member Scott Wiener refusing to engage with a Fox News reporter, substituting "Fox News is not real news and you're not a real reporter" for an actual answer, is the best. A+

Do you care about the Emmy Awards? If you do, here is a complete list of this year's nominees! Please give all the Emmys to Viola Davis and Jonathan Banks and call it a day. Thanks!

Lindsay Ellis and Mara Wilson imagine what it would be like "If Tom Hardy Were Your Boyfriend." I am not a scientist, but I am the nation's leading tomhardyologist, and I will tell you that this critical thinkpiece is 100% accurate.

And finally! Farm Animals in Hats! I repeat: FARM ANIMALS IN HATS. *ded*

Open Wide...

Welp, We May Have an Idea of What the Problem Is

[Content Note: Misogyny; sterilization.]

This interview with Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige is a mess.

He's asked about criticism of Marvel's portrayal and prominence of female characters in their extremely successful film franchises, and he starts out with the most yawn-inducing pap in Marvel's defense: "There have been strong, powerful, intelligent women in the comics for decades. "And if you go back to look at our movies—whether it's Natalie Portman in the Thor films, Gwyneth Paltrow in Iron Man or Scarlett Johansson in The Avengers—our films have been full of smart, intelligent, powerful women." He added that Marvel has always "gone for the powerful woman versus the damsel in distress."

It's certainly interesting that he lists two non-superhero female characters and Marvel's most prominent female superhero thus far (Black Widow) in the same list, without a trace of irony that he's proving the very point. Would Captain America be listed alongside mortal sidekicks in a list of male representation in superhero films? Of course not.

(Which is to say nothing of the fact that I feel his contention all of those female characters are "powerful" is debatable. Nor the fact that they are all thin, straight, white, cis, young women.)

Feige then segues into addressing the criticism about the lack of headlining female superheroes:

"They haven't been the title characters up till this point and that has changed now that we've announced Captain Marvel, in which the title character will be Carol Danvers," he says, referring to a popular character from the comic books who acquires special powers after her genes fuse with alien ones during an explosion.
What he doesn't mention is that Captain Marvel's "release date, and that of Black Panther, the studio's first solo film for a person of color, were both moved back so that a new Spider-Man film could open in 2017."

He does, however, insist that Captain Marvel "is unrelated to the calls for more substantial female characters in Marvel's cinematic universe, where film and television projects are typically planned years in advance, with releases now scheduled up to 2028." In fact, he has a lot to say about how the demand for more female characters is definitely for sure being ignored!
Marvel, he repeats, is not reacting to such critiques.

"It would paralyse you if you were trying to develop a story or character that is going to please everyone on the Internet. You would curl up into a ball and never do anything."
That sounds familiar! It seems like I've heard that from every male filmmaker who is criticized for a cavernous lack of equitable female representation, who repeat this garbage line like it's made out of solid gold and without any seeming awareness or concern that there shouldn't be any urgency to "please" aggressively misogynistic fanboys who caterwaul about destroyed childhoods when they don't get all straight white male superheroes all the time.

It's funny, ahem, how the observation that "you'll destroy yourself trying to make everyone happy" never seems to be invoked by a male filmmaker who has alienated the most execrably sexist fanboys on the internet and satisfied marginalized people seeking visible representation. Funny, ahem, how it's always the marginalized folks who are the ones disappointed by the "can't please everyone!" compromises.

(With the glaring exception of Paul Feig's hilariously contemptuous responses to Ghostbusters fanboys.)

Anyway.

Feige then went on to defend Black Widow from criticism, even though all criticism is valid, except for how it's not. Or something.
Mr Feige is quick to defend Marvel over what some saw as a sexist portrayal of Black Widow, Johansson's character in Avengers: Age Of Ultron, which triggered a lively debate among critics and fans.

Feminists took issue with the fact that the script had Black Widow believing she is a "monster" because she was sterilised and cannot have children and that another character comments about how she has flirted with multiple members of the Avengers team.

Avengers: Age Of Ultron stars Jeremy Renner and Chris Evans were also accused of sexism after calling the Black Widow character a "slut" and a "whore" in an interview, although they said the remarks were in jest.

"In terms of essays written about Black Widow in Ultron, I think they're all valid. Everybody's opinions are valid," Mr Feige says.

But "to suggest that female characters can't have multiple dimensions is also ludicrous".

"That Black Widow went through a programme in which she was forced to have her reproductive organs removed is probably a little upsetting to her. So that people would be upset that she's upset - that's a little strange," he adds.
This is just the most mendacious misrepresentation of the criticism being made. The general critique was not that Black Widow shouldn't be upset, but that having her refer to herself as a "monster" because she couldn't bear children was a shitty commentary that dehumanized women who can't/don't have children and entrenched definitions of womanhood in terms of one's ability and willingness to be a childbearing vessel.

I would call Feige's misrepresentation of the criticism a strawman, but that would be an insult to strawmen, which are far more substantial than that wisp of shameful deflection.

And then came this, because of course:
"And there's no bigger advocate for women than Joss Whedon," he says, referring to Age Of Ultron's director, who has been a vocal proponent of women's rights. "To suggest he's done anything to undermine that is ludicrous."
Criticizing the quality of Marvel's female characters is "ludicrous." Criticizing Joss Whedon is "ludicrous." Sure.

I have an idea for Mr. Feige, for Marvel's first fat female superhero: Me, in a bright purple superhero costume with a billowing cape, and emblazoned across my chest in gold lettering: "LUDICROUS." My superpower? UNDILUTED CONTEMPT.

Open Wide...

Looking For Bernie, Part 3: Sanders '90

[CN:Racism, sexism, gun violence, disablist language. This is part three in a four-part series analyzing Bernie Sanders' political history through an intersectional feminist lens, asking questions about the role privilege has played in that development. Previously in this series: Looking for Bernie, Part 1: Sanders '72 and Looking for Bernie, Part 2:Mr. Sanders Goes to Burlington.]

PART 3: SANDERS '90

As far back as 1972, Sanders had been told that he should be running for Congress, not for governor, because of his interest in national policy and foreign affairs. In 1988, he revisited that advice. Vermont's Senator Robert Stafford retired; Congressman Jim Jefford chose to run for his seat rather than for re-election to the House of Congress. Sanders decided to run. As he writes in his autobiography, Outsider in the House:

I began the race as a "spoiler." (Oh how I love that word, with its implications of the sacrosanct nature of the two-party system.) Would I take away enough votes from the Democrat to elect the Republican? But a funny thing happened on the way to Election Day. I wasn't the spoiler, after all. The Democrat was.
Sanders lost the race to Republican Peter Smith—but only by 3.5%. His Democratic opponent came in third—a distant third at that. It was a victory, of sorts, for Sanders, shaking up the Vermont party system and raising the previously preposterous idea that he might get into national office. He was no longer the 1970s radical running "educational" campaigns. He'd learned to make nice with business in Burlington, and to fashion his campaigns around voter concerns, rather than the other way around. He had become quite a skilled and canny politician, who could do deals when he needed to.

Congressional_Directory_Pic_Of_Sanders photo sanders105thcong1997 242x282 2_zpswnabcse7.jpg

[Representative Bernie Sanders in the 105th Congressional Pictorial Directory.]

In his autobiography, Sanders explains that he weighed a number of options for 1990, including a possible gubernatorial run, since Madeleine Kunin decided not to stand for a further term that year. He decided instead that he had a chance to unseat Smith, based on his good showing in 1988, and also because the Savings and Loan scandal was tarnishing the reputation of both parties in Congress. All that makes sense.

But I also think there may have been another factor involved: Sanders and the Vermont Democrats came to a truce. I don't know if it was explicit or implicit in 1990. But the facts are that the Democrats gave approximately zero support to Sanders' Democratic opponent in 1990. Upon his election, Sanders caucused with the Democrats. By 2005, Howard Dean was describing Sanders as basically a liberal Democrat, who voted with the Democratic Party "98% of the time." (Link goes to a YouTube clip of Dean saying this on Meet the Press. I've seen that percentage thrown around with no context; it seems to be just Howard Dean's offhand remark, not an actual figure based on statistical analysis.)

I doubt Sanders appreciated Dean's downplaying of his socialism, but Dean's remarks provide insight into how the Vermont Democratic Party came to view Sanders: he might be formally outside the party structure, but in practice things are different. One way or another, he hasn't had to worry about a strongly supported Democratic challenger for some time. In 1994, 1998, 2000 and 2002, no Democratic candidate opposed Sanders for Congress. Sanders ran in the Democratic primary in 2006, but declined the Democratic nomination in order to run as an Independent for Senate. The years when Democratic candidates did run, their lackluster performances suggest a distinct lack of support from the party. And the first candidate to feel that lack of support, unfortunately, was Dolores Sandoval, one of the most innovative and interesting political voices I heard during the course of this research.

Open Wide...

And Again

[Content Note: Police brutality; racism; death; self-harm.]

Sandra Bland, a 28-year-old black woman from suburban Chicago, had just relocated to Waller County, Texas, for a job in student outreach at her alma mater, Prairie View A&M University in Texas. She was to start in her new position this week.

Last Friday, she was pulled over near the university by a state trooper for improperly signaling a lane change. According to Waller County Sheriff's Department officials, she became "combative" with the trooper, who then restrained her and arrested her for assault on a public servant. She was taken into custody and was found dead in her cell on Monday morning. The Waller County Sheriff's Department say that she killed herself.

As is rage-makingly familiar by this point, officers' version of events is being disputed. In this ABC Chicago news report, Bland's friend Malcolm Jackson says: "After he pulled her out of the car, forced her and tossed her to the ground, knee to the neck, and arrested her." A video shot of the arrest, which begins after Bland is already on the ground, Bland can be heard exclaiming, "You just slammed my head into the ground. Do you not even care about that? I can't even hear!"

ABC Chicago also reports: "The Texas State Rangers are now overseeing the investigation of Sandy Bland's death. They have not commented on the release of the arrest video, and there are thought to be other videos of the arrest, perhaps closer and from other angles." One of them might start earlier, giving further insight into what happened between Bland being pulled over for a routine traffic stop and being roughly thrown and pinned to the ground.

Bland's family and friends say it's inconceivable to them that Bland would have killed herself. It's not unheard of, of course, for people to take their own lives and utterly shock their loved ones by doing so. But it certainly does seem strange that Bland, who had just moved to begin a job about which she was excited, and who had posted regularly on social media about the injustice of police killings of black women and men, would have ended her own life in police custody.

And this is very curious: The Chicago Tribune includes in their report today that "online county jail records show that Bland was arrested Friday and was to be released Monday on $5,000 bail." And according to Waller County Sheriff Glenn Smith, "jailers saw Bland at 7 a.m. Monday when they gave her breakfast and again at 8 a.m. when they spoke with her over the jail intercom. Smith says she was found dead an hour later." Why would someone who knows she's just about to be released kill herself?

Further, per the Tribune's report, Smith said "Bland was found Monday morning by a female jailer who had gone to Bland's cell to see if she wanted some recreation time." As Jamilah Lemieux observes here: "If Bland was to have been released on Monday, why was she being offered 'recreation time?'"

Waller County District Attorney Elton Mathis says, "I do not have any information that would make me think it was anything other than just a suicide," but there are some significant questions that need to be answered, before any reasonable person would be convinced that Bland took her own life.

Her family and friends are demanding those answers. And will certainly demand accountability if the Texas Rangers investigation, or any subsequent investigations (like, say, by the Department of Justice, ahem), find that Bland was left to die of an untreated head injury or killed in some other way.

They have my sincere condolences for their loss, and my support as they pursue the truth. #JusticeForSandy

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of a Thai xylaphone

Hosted by a ranat ek.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Suggested by Shaker Alison Rose: "What book did you read as a child (either in elementary school or as a teenager) that you reread later in life and had a totally different reaction to and understanding of as an adult?"

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

"After two decades of hunting for exoplanets, we are finally beginning to see long-period gas giant planets similar to those in our own Solar System thanks to the long-term stability of planet hunting instruments like HARPS. This discovery is, in every respect, an exciting sign that other solar systems may be out there waiting to be discovered."—Megan Bedell, of the University of Chicago's Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics and lead author of a paper on the findings of a "Brazilian-led team [which] has been targeting Sun-like stars in a bid to find planetary systems similar to our Solar System."

According to the most recent theories, the arrangement of our Solar System, so conducive to life, was made possible by the presence of Jupiter and the gravitational influence this gas giant exerted on the Solar System during its formative years. It would seem, therefore, that finding a Jupiter twin is an important milestone on the road to finding a planetary system that mirrors our own.

...The team has now uncovered a planet with a very similar mass to Jupiter, orbiting a Sun-like star, HIP 11915, at almost exactly the same distance as Jupiter. The new discovery was made using HARPS, one of the world's most precise planet-hunting instruments, mounted on the ESO 3.6-metre telescope at the La Silla Observatory in Chile.

...According to Jorge Melendez, of the Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil, the leader of the team and co-author of the paper, "the quest for an Earth 2.0, and for a complete Solar System 2.0, is one of the most exciting endeavors in astronomy. We are thrilled to be part of this cutting-edge research, made possible by the observational facilities provided by ESO."
So cool.

Open Wide...

Obama on Cosby

[Content Note: Rape culture. Video may autoplay at link.]

Since the reveal of Bill Cosby's admission that he procured drugs to rape women, there has been a campaign to revoke his Medal of Freedom, which he was awarded in 2002. Today, President Obama was asked about that campaign:

President Barack Obama said Wednesday that there is no precedent for revoking the U.S. Medal of Freedom -- as some have called for him to do -- given to comedian and actor Bill Cosby. But the President did outline his definition of rape.

"There's no precedent for revoking a medal. We don't have that mechanism," he said.

The President then paused, and while he would not comment on the specifics of a case in which criminal or civil charges could be brought, he instead offered a definition of rape.

"If you give a woman -- or a man, for that matter -- without his or her knowledge a drug and then have sex with that person without consent, that's rape," Obama said Wednesday at a White House press conference.
That's not a perfect statement—"engage in sexual interaction with that person without consent" would be better than "have sex with that person without consent," as "having sex" implies two (or more) conscious and consenting people, but, given that this response was clearly off the top of his head, I ain't gonna be too mad at the President.

He couldn't comment directly on a specific case, but what he could do was say that the action to which Cosby has admitted is rape. And that is not a small thing.

Our President was given an opportunity, and he took it. Our President said, in no uncertain terms, that drugging someone to assault them is rape.

In the midst of a national conversation in which many apologists continue to argue that what Cosby has done, repeatedly, is something other than rape, President Obama's statement is important. And it is very meaningful to me, as a survivor.

Open Wide...

The Wednesday Blogaround

This blogaround brought to you by pants.

Recommended Reading:

Shena: [Content Note: Violence against women] Outrage Erupts in Argentina over Brutal Murders of Women

Ragen: [CN: Fat hatred; diet talk] Even If Weight Loss Would Solve Every Problem

Mahroh: [CN: Racism; terrorism] Meet Faatimah Knight, the Black Muslim Woman Fundraising for Burned Black Churches

Angry Asian Man: [CN: Racism; religious oppression] Disney Accused of Segregating Sikh Employee

Shane: [CN: Misogynoir] Serena vs. Tennis: There's Only One Winner

Andrea: [CN: Misogyny] All Straight Men Must Go See Magic Mike XXL Right Now (Well, After Reading This)

Mika & Maddie: Earth, Meet Hydra

Kenrya: John Lewis Recreated Selma March at Comic-Con in Full Costume

Leave your links and recommendations in comments. Self-promotion welcome and encouraged!

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime



Heart: "Barracuda"

Open Wide...

In the News

Here is some stuff in the news today...

[Content Note: Flooding; death] Kentucky Governor Steve Beshear has declared a state of emergency after severe flooding in the state has killed two people and prompted rescue efforts for six others who are missing: "Rescue crews are searching in heavy rain and mud in the state's hilly Appalachian terrain, in the north-eastern area of the state. ...The search area is eight miles (13km) long, in a rural area with only 1,200 residents. Those missing range in age from 22 to 74. ...Crews will continue searching ground they have already covered and start new searches using excavators and dump trucks, joined by the US National Guard." My condolences to the families and friends of those lost, and I fervently hope that the rescue efforts find survivors.

[CN: War; Nazi reference] Republicans are losing their shit over President Obama's nuclear deal with Iran, because of course they are, and here is Illinois Senator Mark Kirk being typically ridiculous: "'This is the greatest appeasement since Chamberlain gave Czechoslovakia to Hitler,' Kirk continued, saying he believed Obama only went through with the deal because he has a poor understanding of history and did not realize appeasement made war more likely. Kirk said he thought the deal meant that Israel would now have to take 'military action against Iran.'" For fuck's sake.

[CN: Carcerality; racism] Yesterday, President Obama used the occasion of a speech at the NAACP annual convention to criticize the US' mass incarceration: "Calling for an end to mass incarceration and for wholesale changes in a system that 'by a wide margin … disproportionately impacts communities of color,' the president described the criminal justice system as 'an aspect of American life that remains particularly skewed by race and by wealth,' and 'a source of inequity that has ripple effects on families and on communities throughout our nation.' ...The speech was delivered just one day after the president commuted the sentences of 46 federal prisoners convicted for nonviolent drug offenses, and appears to be part of a larger late-presidency push to make progress on an issue that enjoys a unique degree of bipartisan support. Obama noted several times in his address the 'unlikely bedfellows' that reform has brought together, like senators Corey Booker and Rand Paul who introduced legislation in March aimed at keeping nonviolent offenders out of prison. 'You've got Americans for Tax Reform and the ACLU, you've got the NAACP and the Koch brothers!' Obama said to laughter from the audience." Major kudos to the prison reform and prison abolition activists whose tireless work has raised awareness all the way to the White House.

[CN: Police brutality; racism] "One federal judge thinks the taxpayers of Gardena, CA deserve to see the video of police officers opening fire on three innocent people, killing one. With the city getting ready to pay $4.7 million to the family of Ricardo Diaz-Zeferino, an unarmed man shot for putting down his hands [to pull up his pants], Judge Stephen V. Wilson believes the defendants should not be able to hide from their deadly mistakes." Good. I think there's a serious conversation to be had about the proliferation of images of the state-sanctioned murders of people of color, and the value of sharing them, but the state should not be allowed to conceal those images from public view.

[CN: Food insecurity; class warfare] My pal Katie Klabusich on the GOP, food stamps, and "How Republicans Are Taking Food out of My Mouth." Go read it!

[CN: Abortion stigma] In news that will surprise no one, a new study has found that "only very rarely do women regret having an abortion." No kidding! "The research also hints at what factors might make women feel more regret about the choice to have an abortion. Women who struggled more with the initial decision and those with a greater desire to be pregnant were more likely to say that abortion was the wrong choice for them. Women who felt that their community stigmatized abortion and women without much social support reported more negative emotions around the procedure." (Huh!)

[CN: Homophobia] LOOOOOOVE: "Italian Sports Magazine Taunts Homophobes with Kissing Gay Rugby Couple." That picture! *fans self*

Nearly $377 million has already been raised for the 2016 presidential election, which is still a year and a half away. Thanks a fuckload, Citizens United!

And finally! "Dog with allergies to humans adopted by vet who treated it." Are you even kidding me? Awwwwww.

Open Wide...