TV Corner: Better Call Saul

[Content Note: Spoilers are having their office repainted herein. Discussion of sexual violence and rape apologist tropes; disability.]

image of Bob Odenkirk leaning against his shitty yellow car, talking on a cell phone, from Better Call Saul

Sunday night was the first half of the two-part premiere of Better Call Saul, the Breaking Bad spin-off prequel documenting the rise of dirty attorney Saul Goodman. Last night, the second half aired. And OMG THIS SHOW.

We are two episodes in, and I'm already remembering how Vince Gilligan turned me into an anxious, wrung-out, shitshow mess during the final season of Breaking Bad, lol. I mean.

screen cap of tweet authored by me reading: 'Only evil genius Vince Gilligan could make me feel this anxious for a character who I KNOW SURVIVES. #BetterCallSaul'

Honestly, despite all attempts to temper my expectations for Better Call Saul, I had really high hopes going in, mainly because of this article. I knew that Gilligan & Co. were working really hard to deliver a great product, and I trusted that they would.

I didn't expect—or want—this show to be Breaking Bad: Part 2. I expected and hoped that it would be its own thing—a cousin of Breaking Bad, rather than a replica. And Gilligan has achieved precisely that: Better Call Saul has enough references to Breaking Bad to feel like it exists in the same universe, but is distinct and original enough to stand on its own. And to capture my attention of its own accord.

In the Guardian, Richard Vine described it as New Order to Breaking Bad's Joy Division, and that is a perfect description.

Of course I loved seeing Mike and Tuco—familiar characters we met through the prism of Walter White's terrible life—and I love all the thematic similarities (Saul's own random crappy car: a Suzuki Esteem), and I love the callbacks to familiar imagery in Breaking Bad (the battered reflective trash can on which Saul unleashes his frustration, mirroring the battered reflective wallmount paper towel dispenser on which Walt unleashed his), and I love the aesthetic continuity between the two shoes, which is always compelling, and gives us gifts like this memorable shot.

image of Bob Odenkirk in silhouette against a glass entrance door to a parking lot, which casts a slanted beam of light to the side, partially illuminating a blond white woman smoking a cigarette

But mostly I just love this origin story. Every piece of it, from the black and white scene of Saul's present life—being lived, as he predicted, as a manager of a Cinnabon in Omaha—to his vibrantly colored past, where he is not even yet Saul Goodman, but Jimmy McGill, a struggling lawyer who is trying, and failing, to build a practice that will make him a living.

He is hustling for paying clients, and meanwhile spending his time as a public defender, for $700 a defense. He is obliged to defend three rich white teenage boys, on trial for mutilating and sexually violating a corpse (which we don't know until later), and here the show provides us with a searing commentary on the dirty work Saul was doing even when he was a clean lawyer.
"Oh, to be 19 again. Are you with me, ladies and gentlemen? Do you remember 19? Lemme tell ya—juices are flowing, the red corpuscles are corpuscling, the grass is green and soft and summer's gonna last forever. Now do you remember? Yeah you do. But, if you're being honest—I mean, really honest—you'll recall that you also had an underdeveloped 19-year-old brain. Me personally? If I were held accountable for some of the stupid decisions I made when I was 19, oh boy, wow. I bet if we were in church right now, I'd get a big AMEN!"

Crickets.

"Which brings us to these three. Now, these three knuckleheads—and I'm sorry, boys, but that's what you are—they did a dumb thing. We're not denying that. However, I would like you to remember two salient facts: Fact One: Nobody got hurt. Not a soul. Very important to keep that in mind. Fact Two: Now the prosecution keeps bandying this term 'criminal trespass.' Mr. Spinozo, the property owner, admitted to us that he keeps most portions of his business open to the public both day and night, so."

Dubious shrug.

"Trespassing? Eh, it's a bit of a reach, don't you think? Here's what I know: These three young men, near honors students all, were feeling their oats one Saturday night, and they just went a little bananas. I dunno. Call me crazy, but I don't think they deserve to have their bright futures ruined by a momentary, minute, never-to-be-repeated lapse of judgment. Ladies and gentlemen, you're bigger than that."
It is then the prosecutor plays the video of the young men's crime, and we are invited to judge this horror against the flippant "boys will be boys!" defense mounted by Saul. Who could barely deliver it, without looking ashamed.

Later, when he collects his public defender's fee from the court clerk, he complains about how little he's being paid. "They going to jail, ain't they?" she asks him. "So?! Since when does that matter?! They had sex with a head!" he exclaims in return. He has contempt for his court-appointed clients, because they are utterly contemptible.

Nothing in Saul's life is making him happy. Not his clients, not the paltry sums he makes for defending them, not his car, not his tiny office in the back of the pedicurist he once recommended to Walter White as a money-laundering front, and not that his older brother's law firm is taking advantage of the fact that his brother (played by the terrific Michael McKean) is ill—and lives in a self-imposed exile away from electromagnetic devices which he believes has made him sick.

Saul has to walk a fine line between not infantilizing his brother or auditing his experience with the reality that his brother's illness is a psychological one, and may be compromising his future and his ability to support himself.

That's certainly not a theme I expected from the show, and, so far at least, I think the show is handling it well.

To add insult to a multitude of injury, Saul's own brother suggests that he not use his given name, Jimmy McGill, because his brother's last name is part of the successful firm name, and Saul should make his own way and not ride on others' coattails. Even his very identity is not his own, and not within his control.

And so begins the journey of Saul Goodman.

Already, he has had a harrowing encounter with the unpredictable and vicious Tuco, where we see (again) that Saul Goodman's most valuable asset is (and has always been) his ability to think fast and talk even faster.

"You've got quite a mouth on you," Tuco tells him, after Saul negotiates his freedom.

"Thank you," Saul replies.

That mouth will no doubt be the thing that gets him into trouble, and the thing that gets him out of trouble, in equal measure. And I will happily go along for the ride, shrieking and curling into a ball and gritting my teeth with anxiety, as I can barely stand to look but definitely can't look away.

I can't begin to remember what I thought about Breaking Bad, and where it would go, after two episodes, so I won't make predictions about Better Call Saul. Even though we know where it's headed, I have no idea how it will get there.

My impression, though, is that, if Breaking Bad was the story of a man who made all the wrong choices, Better Call Saul may be the story of a man who was left with no good ones.

Open Wide...

Fat Fashion

This is your semi-regular thread in which fat women can share pix, make recommendations for clothes they love, ask questions of other fat women about where to locate certain plus-size items, share info about sales, talk about what jeans cut at what retailer best fits their body shapes, discuss how to accessorize neutral colored suits, share stories of going bare-armed for the first time, brag about a cool fashion moment, whatever.

* * *

One of my favorite sites for clothes is SimplyBe, which carries a wide variety of styles in sizes 8-28. (Which I realize doesn't do a hell of a lot of good for anyone outside that size range.) One of the things I like about it is that there are multiple designers who include or specialize in sizes for fat women, and I'm a particular fan of Joe Browns.

I was lusting after this Joe Browns jacket for a very long time, and it recently went on sale for 50% off. I needed a light jacket for spring, which has been a hole in my wardrobe that bugs me every year, so I got it as soon as it fell to $40.

image of me wearing a pink coat with a red ruffled collar and brass buttons
And I love it!

Now I just have to wait for the weather to warm up so that I can actually wear it. Haha!

(I know, I know. I really need a full-length mirror. Or longer arms. I think the full-length mirror is the more feasible option, though.)

Anyway! As always, all subjects related to fat fashion are on topic, but if you want a topic for discussion: Is there a piece of clothing that you've just bought or have owned for awhile that you can't wait to wear once the weather changes?

Have at it in comments! Please remember to make fat women of all sizes, especially women who find themselves regularly sizing out of standard plus-size lines, welcome in this conversation, and pass no judgment on fat women who want to and/or feel obliged, for any reason, to conform to beauty standards. And please make sure if you're soliciting advice, you make it clear you're seeking suggestions—and please be considerate not to offer unsolicited advice. Sometimes people just need to complain and want solidarity, not solutions.

Open Wide...

Blog Note

It's not just you: Some people are experiencing lags in seeing their comments posting to the page. If you don't see your comment right away, no need to post it twice; it'll show up. If you see your comment appear then seem to disappear, it's not because it's been deleted. I've let Disqus know; hopefully it will be resolved soon.

Open Wide...

Nope

[Content Note: Violence; descriptions of abuse; dehumanization.]

Hitting it out of the park as usual, CNN has published a piece by Sally Kohn originally titled "Are selfies bad for us?" and currently titled "Do selfies erode our humanity?" in which Kohn wonders if "selfie culture" reflects "us as we've always been or is it turning us into something worse?"

To make her case, Kohn relates several cases of sexual assault and violence which has some connection to images published on social media, and then argues:

But, social media seems to have increased incivility or hate speech in our society by making us more aware of its prevalence. People who were once shouting sexist and racist epithets from the windowless basements of their parents' homes now have Internet connections and can share those epithets on Twitter and beyond. The assault on civility, just like the assault on women's bodies, is nothing new. The new part is that even the loneliest of people now have the tools to broadcast their assaults far and wide.
There is so much wrong in that paragraph, I hardly know where to begin. The reiteration of the stereotype of harassers as losers and loners. The implication that the internet amplifies harassment, as opposed to just making more visible to privileged people the harassment directed at marginalized people all the time in our offline lives. (Again: It's not like no random dude ever called me a fat cunt before I started a blog.) The suggestion that rapists and other abusers only began boasting about their acts of violence in tandem with the emergence of a "selfie culture."

Absolutely not. Boasting about rape and other acts of violence is a feature of rape culture, and it existed long before social media. Bros bragging about their "conquests" to their buddies. Husbands bragging about "putting the wife in her place" to their coworkers. Paintings and sculptures and stories and films have been created to document artists' acts of abuse, or the acts of abuse committed by conquering heroes in oft-told legends.

The man who raped me wrote a poem about it which was then circulated among our classmates.

To imagine such casual and unafraid and bellicose boasting started with selfies. For fuck's sake. What a luxury.

Kohn concludes:
We take more selfies than ever before, and yet we seem to be less self-aware. Social media allows the narcissism in all of us to come out. Some people take it to the extreme by posting assaults of violent acts. One has to wonder how much this public platform has eroded our humanity.
This is the thing: Many women use selfies to humanize ourselves. Which is not about narcissism, but visibility. To conflate that with the dehumanizing and self-serving shit abusers do, I can't even.

[H/T to Lauren Chief Elk.]

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Matilda the Fuzzy Blue-Eyed Sealpoint Cat, sitting in a stream of sunlight
Matilda, in the sunshine.

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime



Beyoncé: "Halo"

Open Wide...

In the News

Here is some stuff in the news today...

[Content Note: Sexual violence; descriptions of assault] My friend Jessica Luther wrote a story for Sports Illustrated on the Vanderbilt rape case. It is difficult but important reading. One of the most horrific details: "When the police contacted the woman on June 26, three days after the assault, she says that she at first told them what Vandenburg had told her had happened: In the afternoon on the day of the assault, she testified that 'he told me that I had gotten sick in his room and he had to clean it up and that it was horrible and that he had to spend the night taking care of me and it was horrible.' In response to hearing this, she said, 'I apologized. I was embarrassed.' Later when Vandenburg told her he feared that he and his teammates 'might get kicked off the football team' because he was 'getting blamed for stuff that didn't happen,' she vowed to help him clear his name." Only later did she find out the truth. Rapists are liars. Manipulative, contemptible liars.

[CN: Terrorism; death] Terrible: "U.S. President Barack Obama on Tuesday confirmed the death of Kayla Mueller, a U.S. aid worker who had been held hostage by Islamic State militants, saying the United States would 'find and bring to justice the terrorists who are responsible.' Mueller's family also said in a statement that they were 'heartbroken' to learn of her death. ...Mueller was determined to have died after her Islamic State captors privately contacted her family over the weekend, a White House spokeswoman said." Goddammit. I can't even imagine. Not only losing her, but finding out because the terrorists who killed her called to tell you.

Senator Elizabeth Warren is going all in on HSBC: "The US Department of Justice is considering bringing criminal charges against HSBC and its executives as part of its investigation into whether the bank's Swiss subsidiary helped US clients evade taxes. Democratic senator Elizabeth Warren called on prosecutors to 'come down hard' on HSBC if the bank is found to have colluded with tax evaders on Tuesday. ...'The government comes down hard on individuals who break the law time after time, and it should do the same for large financial institutions,' the Massachusetts senator said in a statement to the Guardian on Tuesday. 'The new allegations that HSBC colluded to help wealthy people and rich corporations hide money and avoid taxes are very serious, and, if true, the Department of Justice should reconsider the earlier deferred prosecution agreement it entered into with HSBC and prosecute the new violations to the full extent of the law.'" Right on.

[CN: War on agency; hostility to consent] I don't even have words: "In the aftermath of a high-profile legal battle over a brain-dead woman who was kept on life support against her family's wishes because she was pregnant, one Texas lawmaker is readying a bill that would re-open the contentious debate. According to the Dallas Morning News, a Republican lawmaker is preparing to introduce a piece of legislation that would appoint legal representation for fetuses in future disputes over whether pregnant women should remain hooked up to life support. State Rep. Matt Krause (R) believes that will allow a judge to hear both sides of the issue before making a decision about what to do. 'You'll hear what the family wants, and you'll also give the pre-born child a chance to have a voice in court at that same time,' Krause [said]."

[CN: War on agency] In good news: "Far too many students graduate from law school with little to no academic exposure to reproductive rights law. ...This month, however, Foundation Press has published the first legal textbook available on the subject, which can aid instructors and assist students campaigning for courses on their campuses. Berkeley Law professors and faculty directors at the Center on Reproductive Rights and Justice Melissa Murray and Kristin Luker co-authored Cases on Reproductive Rights and Justice to fill the gap in existing educational materials, define the parameters of the field, and upend the conventional treatment of the topics by consciously exploring both rights- and justice-based frameworks." YES.

[CN: Class warfare; worker exploitation] My contempt is cavernous: "Staples Threatens to Fire Staff for Working More Than 25 Hours a Week: In 2015, an Affordable Care Act provision requiring large employers to offer health insurance to staff working more than 30 hours a week kicked into effect. Now, some part-time staff at Staples say management has become extra vigilant about limiting their hours."

[CN: Homophobia] Former senior White House adviser and chief campaign strategist David Axelrod says President Barack Obama "was 'bullshitting' his opposition to gay marriage and support for civil unions during his 2008 presidential campaign." Yeah. We know.

Whooooooooooooooops don't complain about your new job on Twitter before you've even started it! A good rule is not complaining about your job on Twitter full-stop.

And finally! This is the cat you were looking for: An even grumpier cat!

Open Wide...

This Fu@#ing Guy

[Content Note: Trans* hatred; gender policing; bathroom panic; rape culture.]

Another Republican lawmaker has introduced yet another shitty transphobic bill, based on bullshit narratives about trans* predators:

Florida state Rep. Frank Artiles is not worried a bill he introduced last week will create problems for transgender people, he told BuzzFeed News, because using the restroom is a choice.

The Miami Republican's bill would restrict single-sex public facilities — including restrooms in restaurants, theaters, workplaces, and schools — to people of the corresponding "biological sex, either male or female, at birth." Violators would be guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by up to a year in jail.

Asked if such a rule would create problems for transgender women required to use the men's room, Artiles told BuzzFeed News, "People are not forced to go the restroom. They choose to go to the restroom."
For someone who purports to be an expert on biology, he sure is confused about the human waste disposal system.

Naturally, Artiles has given this a lot of thought, and thus has super-smart (super-terrible) things to say about people's "plumbing" how "anatomy is going to dictate where they go to the bathroom." Because genitals define gender, and intersex people don't exist. And he gets an A+ for being able to regurgitate nasty stereotypes about trans* women being sexual predators:
Artiles countered his wish is "not to attack transgender people or make their lives difficult." However, he said several times, the bill was a direct response to local laws in Florida that ban discrimination against transgender people. Specifically, he said, a law passed in December in Miami-Dade County, which encompasses Artiles' district, "gives the cover of law for people who use this as a loophole for voyeurism and other criminal activity. While I understand the good intention, it is overly broad."

"You have sexual predators — you have people who are going to use these local ordinances as cover," said Artiles. "I want uniformity across the board, and not laws subjective to the way people feel."
The bathroom panic meme is comprehensive garbage. I cannot state that more emphatically. It is hateful, mendacious trash.

And, like every other conservative legislator peddling this reprehensible codswallop, Artiles does not have a legislative record that indicates he has any meaningful interest in sexual assault prevention, but suddenly cares deeply about it when it comes to justifying discrimination against trans* people. He can't provide a single example of a sexual predator exploiting inclusive bathroom ordinances, but he's sure this is a much bigger problem than, say, cis men raping women. Including trans* women.

Like, for example, trans* women who are forced to use men's bathrooms. Artiles purports to be concerned about preventing violence, but he is eminently willing to send trans* people into situations where they are at greater risk for violence.

Every single one of Artiles' attempts to rationalize this bill is pathetic. He claims to "want uniformity" in who is using which bathroom, but naturally "people who identify as women use the women's restroom and people who identity as men use the men's restroom" isn't sufficient "uniformity" to satisfy him.
"While I understand there are transgender people who want to use bathrooms however they want to feel, that is irrelevant to me," Artiles explained.
While I understand that there are cis people who want to legislate which bathrooms trans* people can safely and legally use because of how they feel about trans* people, that is irrelevant to me.
"I have read the blogs that say I am against transgender people, but I am not at all," Artiles said. Asked if he believes a transgender woman is a woman, Artiles said, "I am not going to get into that. I have not spent much time thinking about that."
If there is a more perfect quote illustrating the arrogance of privilege, I haven't seen it.

This cis man has written legislation banning women from women's bathrooms, but hasn't spent much time thinking about that fact.

Which is to say nothing of the fact that it doesn't fucking matter if Artiles "believes a transgender woman is a woman." Cis people auditing trans* people's gender, and believing they have the right to deny trans* people authority on their own selves, is what underwrites this sort of bigoted legislation in the first place.

Rage. Seethe. Boil.

I am a cis woman, and a survivor of sexual violence. I am exactly the type of person that Artiles and all his contemptible colleagues invoke as needing protection from trans* predators. AND I WANT THEM TO STOP. I don't need their protection. They do not have my permission to pretend that they're "saving" me by endangering trans* people.

Do not use me as your justification for transphobic hatred.

I am not in danger from sharing a bathroom with trans* women. But trans* women could very well be in danger from not being allowed to share a bathroom with me.

Open Wide...

Of Course

Maybe you've heard that Hillary Clinton is presumed to be running for president. Perhaps you've also heard that she shouldn't be running for president. Or should have announced by now if she is. And is ruining everything for the men who want to run, unless she's running. Maybe you've heard that she'll ruin her party, and the very country, if she doesn't run, but also that she'll ruin her party, and the very country, if she does. She needs to get her ass in the game and run. She needs to take her boobs and go home.

There is a chance you've also heard that the Republicans want her to run, because they're convinced they'll trounce her. And also that the Republicans don't want her to run, because they're convinced they can't beat her.

I imagine an awful lot of stuff has gone into Hillary Clinton's decision to run for president, and when to announce her candidacy. (Presuming she does, which seems increasingly likely.) I also imagine Republicans' opinion is not among that stuff.

But when has their irrelevance on any subject stopped them? (Never. The answer is never.) So, they're jumping into the Tell Hillary Clinton What to Do Circus, in order to try to preemptively attack her, and also to try to force her to announce earlier than she wants, because HOLY SHIT DO US A FAVOR HILLARY AND TAKE THE FOCUS OFF OUR SHITTY CANDIDATES FOR AWHILE.

The latest front in Republicans' anti-Clinton effort will launch on Tuesday morning, with the Republican National Committee's "Hillary's Hiding" campaign designed to highlight the former secretary of state's recent lack of straightforward political activity despite her presumed pre-candidate status.

The RNC's effort will include billboards in early-primary/caucus states such as Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina, op-eds, and videos like the two-minute post it plans to unveil Tuesday featuring edited clips of President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest, and Clinton, branding her candidacy as "#Obama’s 3rd term."

"What's the only way not to seem like she's campaigning?" asks RNC communications director Sean Spicer in the planned campaign kick-off memo. "Go into hiding."
*thatface*

Obviously, if Clinton were already campaigning, that would be wrong, too. Can't fucking win.

There's no better incentive to never listen to a goddamn thing that someone has to say than knowing they will attack you no matter what you do.

* * *

In other news, here's another terrific story about Democrats who are organizing to draft Senator Elizabeth Warren, despite her repeated comments that she isn't running and doesn't want to run.

Open Wide...

LOL This Cat

This video's been around for awhile, but I only just saw it for the first time last night, and I laughed forever:


Video Description: A Pallas's Cat—a fluffy, grey, sturdy wildcat with wide-set ears—is hiding behind a rock at the entrance to a cave. The cat spies the camera, which has been left to record it. It pops its head up, and stares at the camera. Then it moves forward a step, cautious and staring. The cat emerges and creeps toward the camera, low to the ground. For a moment, it disappears altogether. Then, ever so slowly, its face rises right in front of the lens, too close to be in focus. The cat's features fill the entire screen; its eyes study the camera. Then it slowly, slowly lowers its face and is gone.

Oh cats.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of a colorful rainbow finch sitting on a palm frond

Hosted by a rainbow finch.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Is there any food or drink item that you keep trying, either regularly or once every few years, to see if you'll finally like it, but it just isn't happening?

Eggs. No matter how many times I try them in no matter how many different preparations, it's never gonna happen!

I would like to like eggs, but nope. Every time I try them again, it's the same. Thumbs down.

Open Wide...

The Monday Blogaround

This blogaround brought to you by snow. So much snow.

Recommended Reading:

Eastsidekate [Content Note: MRAs; Storified by Whitney Pollock with Kate's permission] The Privilege to Humanize and Be Humanized

Hel: [CN: Gender policing; homophobia] Moving Images: On Queerness and Eritrean Identity

Sikivu: [CN: Misogynoir; carcerality] Policing Our Girls

Jorge: [CN: Colonialism] Native Americans Talk Gender Identity at a Two-Spirit Powwow

Parker: [CN: Body policing; transphobia] How Transgender Women Make Topless Laws Look Even More Ridiculous and Offensive Than We Already Knew They Were

Andy: First Gay Couple Married in Montgomery County, Alabama Speaks Out About Their Experience

Digby: What the Hell Is It Then?

Sam: This Is a New Species of Fish Legitimately Named After Star Wars' Greedo

Leave your links and recommendations in comments. Self-promotion welcome and encouraged!

Open Wide...

Yiiiiiiiiiiiiiiikes This Guy

[Content Note: Misogyny; dehumanization; sexual entitlement; disablist language.]

Saturday, Washington Post columnist Carolyn Hax answered a letter from a guy who wrote in with this dating conundrum:

Dear Carolyn: I'm an average-looking guy...let's say a 6, and after years of dating, I've come to the conclusion that I have four options when it comes to women, none of which seems to add up to long-term happiness.

Option 1: Be with a woman who is more attractive than me, but less intelligent or mentally stable, thus trading intellectual connection for beauty.

Option 2: Be with a woman of equal intelligence and attractiveness, but spend my life in boredom once the novelty wears off, and end up like every other married zombie.

Option 3: Be with a woman who is more successful and intelligent, but less attractive than I, and spend my life fighting the temptations of lust (think Bill Clinton).

Option 4: Become the lonely creepy uncle everybody invites to Thanksgiving out of pity.

Is my outlook completely distorted and pessimistic? Or am I just being an entitled moron with an inflated ego? Is there a fifth option (other than becoming rich and famous)? I'd really appreciate your feedback.
Carolyn's answer is pretty good, in that she very politely suggests to her correspondent that maybe he isn't actually viewing women as fully human, and, hey, howsabout that as fifth option, bub?

Shaker Alison Rose (who gets the hat tip) suggested on Twitter (which I am sharing with her permission): "Option 5: Leave all women alone, forever."

I think that's a very good suggestion, too!

I might also suggest to this poor, unfulfilled chap that he consider how his rhetoric of frustrated entitlement sounds disturbingly like that of men who have killed women, and wonder why it could be that he sounds so much like violent misogynists, and, if that disturbs him, as well it should, then he should consider that he does not own women and, if he wants someone with a particular set of qualities to date him, then he endeavor to make himself a person that sort of woman would want to date.

Just a thought!

But mostly: What Alison said.

[Related Reading: On the Geek Guys' Elliot Rodger Think Pieces: Part One and Part Two.]

Open Wide...

And Again

[Content Note: Police brutality; death; guns; racism; ageism.]

James Howard Allen, a 74-year-old black man, was killed by police who were asked to do a welfare check on him:

State officials in North Carolina have launched an investigation after a police officer in Gastonia shot and killed a 74-year-old man while performing a welfare check.

Gastonia police Chief Robert Helton explained at a press conference on Sunday that a family member had asked officers to check on James Howard Allen on Saturday afternoon, The Charlotte Observer reported.

Helton said that Allen's family had asked for the welfare check because the 74-year-old veteran had recently undergone surgery.

An officer first visited Allen's home at 10:20 p.m. on Saturday, but there was no answer.

Gastonia police then contacted the Gastonia Fire Department and Gaston Emergency Medical Services at 11:30 p.m. and a "decision was made to enter the house, concerned that he may be inside in need of emergency assistance," Helton said.

According to the chief, Gastonia police Officer Josh Lefevers announced himself before coming through the backdoor of the home, but Allen was pointing a gun at officers when they entered.

"He was challenged to lower the gun down," Helton insisted. "The gun was pointed in the direction of the officers, and a shot was fired that fatally wounded him."
North Carolina is a Stand Your Ground state, which means Allen had no duty to retreat if he believed he was defending himself from harm anywhere, no less in his own home.

But, of course, Stand Your Ground laws do not apply to black people, as we have seen over and over and over and over.

Repeatedly, when armed (and unarmed) black people are killed by police, we are told that there was no other option; that we don't understand what it's like in the heat of the moment, etc. But the police created this moment and its heat: There was certainly a better approach that could have been taken here.

I understand the inherent urgency in requests for welfare checks. But I also understand that any regular person who hears people coming to their door, and then breaking through their door, at 11:30 at night, also doesn't assume it's someone concerned about their welfare.

"He was challenged to lower the gun down." Well, we've heard that before. More than once.

How much time was Allen given to register what was happening before he was shot? How much time was afforded an elderly man who was recovering from surgery and possibly just waking up to understand it was police unaccountably (from his perspective) breaking into his house?

This is intolerable. Intolerable.

Open Wide...

The Walking Thread

[Content Note: Descriptions of violence. Spoilers are lurching around undeadly herein.]

image of Michonne looking ponderous
Michonne wonders why she is even in this garbage show.

When last we left Grimes Gang way back in December, Beth had been killed by Officer Meanlady at Indentured Servitude Asylum, Officer Meanlady had been killed by Daryl, and the Getting Places at the Perfect Time truck had collected all the Grimes Gangians at Indentured Servitude Asylum to make a run for it. Also: Morgan.

You might think that, since we ended the mid-season finale with a scene of a character we haven't seen in fully one million episodes, we'd open with that character, too. But nope! This is The Walking Dead, not a show that is written well and makes sense. So it was just a random reminder that he'll be showing up again soon, or something.

Instead, we open with the digging of dirt—which heralds a grave, so watch out everyone who is not Grimes or Daryl!—and a dreamlike montage that is SO TERRIBLE I CANNOT EVEN BELIEVE I AM WATCHING THIS. Who directed this episode—an overenthusiastic David Lynch understudy?

Because Rick Grimes continues to be a good decision-making machine, he is leading the group to Richmond, Virginia, because that's where Noah is from and Beth wanted to help get him back there, and so, having never listened to Beth or any other woman ever in life, Grimes decides to follow her plan in death.

The group splits into two cars, and they start the drive toward Richmond, with, as usual, no worries about securing gasoline. Or clean water. In the lead car is Grimes, Noah, Tyreese, Michonne, and Glenn. They communicate with the other car via walkie-talkie, and decide they'll go ahead and check it out while the other car hangs back.

Tyreese has lots of lines. An unusual amount of lines. Looks like that grave's got his name on it! Once again, The Walking Dead is its own worst spoiler engine, because, thanks to the racism inherent to the show which centers white characters and their white dialogue, we always know when the next black character is going to die, because suddenly they are given things to say.

Noah is very excited to be getting home to see his mom and little twin brothers, who were still alive last time he was there. But whooooooops upon their arrival, they discover the gated community is overrun by zombies and many of the houses are burned. Noah is devastated.

While Grimes, Michonne, and Glenn go a-scavenging, Tyreese stays with Noah to give him a terrific pep talk about how he's got to get on with life. Because giving him five minutes to mourn is just indulgent! GET OVER IT, KID!

Noah takes off running toward his house, and Tyreese chases after him. Inside, Noah discovers his mom's gruesome corpse, and stops to say Meaningful Things to it while Tyreese investigates the rest of the house. He finds one little brother dead in his bed, and is staring at a million pictures of the twins on the wall—TWO OF THEM! WHAT COULD IT MEAN?!—when the other zombified twin shuffles in and bites the fuck out of his arm. Welp.

Noah runs to get Grimes, Michonne, and Glenn, who are having Important Conversations about Ethics in the Zombiepocalypse or whatever. Meanwhile, Tyreese starts hallucinating that Beth, Lizzie, Mika, Bob, Martin, and Captain Murder are in the little boy's bedroom with him, giving him tons of great advice.

Captain Murder lunges at him, only to morph into a real zombie, who bites Tyreese again. Oh geez.

Elsewhere, Michonne tells Grimes that maybe they should go to DC after all. Even though Doctor Mulletsworth turned out to be a HUGE LIAR, he might have been onto something about how DC could have people there with whom they could find safety. Grimes agrees. It's a miracle!

Noah arrives to tell them Tyreese has been bitten. They follow him back to the scene.

Meanwhile, Tyreese continues his hallucinating. Beth plays guitar and sings, because of course she does. He argues with Captain Murder about his decision to forgive Carol. Lizzie and Mika tell him it's better to be dead. ???!!!

Grimes arrives and grabs Tyreese's arm and Michonne cuts it off. But come on—this guy's been bitten like a dozen times, and there is no way he is even still alive now, no less after he bleeds out from an arm amputation! Still, they drag him to the car, and Grimes barks at Carol over the walkie-talkie to get ready to cauterize the wound and to get Sasha and Carl the Hat outta there, because they don't need to see this. "MAKE SURE THE BABY IS THERE, THOUGH!" he shouts.

Trying to get their vehicle out of the soft earth of the forest, the wheels spin in the mud. Joe Pesci gets out to investigate and pratfalls face-first into the mud, ruining his only good suit. Fred Gwynne is gonna be so pissed! Meanwhile, Marisa Tomei's biological clock is ticking like this: STOMP! STOMP! STOMP! It's a real mess!

Finally the tires grab traction, and the vehicle lurches forward, running into a dead car, out of which tumble a bunch of chomping zombie heads. This show is just getting more disgusting by the episode. Good grief.

They finally get the heck outta there, and Tyreese hallucinates some more, and then dies at long last, relieving us all of having to watch one more impossibly stupid scene of these goddamned absurd '70s golden sunshine lens flare hallucinations, which are so bad I cannot even begin to explain how bad they are. They pull over and drag Tyreese out of the car and onto the road. Michonne pulls out her katana.

But then we cut to Tyreese being buried with what looks like his head still intact? I dunno. Who cares. They bury him, and everyone is sad. Except Grimes, who is angry, obviously. He shovels dirt and he is SO MAD.

Next week: More of this crap.

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Dudley the Greyhound with his head resting on his plushy duck
I mean.

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

The Creative Endeavors Thread

by Shaker Socchan

Howdy, Shakers! Sorry for the long wait between threads; a bunch of stuff happened that basically goes like this: me going on vacation ("vacation"), Shakesville on break for the holidays, mild bout of depression where I spent all of my free time sleeping instead of doing anything creative, work getting super busy, me basically forgetting that I was even doing the Creative Endeavors posts until a Shaker posted about finishing a project in an Open Thread, me coming up with a topic for this post, this post going up (which, as of me writing this, is in the future! Ooooo.).

As a reminder, this is a post dedicated to Shakers discussing creative things that they're doing. This can be traditional medium arts (painting, drawing, etc.), writing anything, composing, performing, or recording anything, fibercrafts (anything with thread/string/yarn), coding, fannish stuff, whatever! As long as it's creative and it's something you're working on, I want to hear about it.

So how about it? Have you started or finished any projects since the previous thread? Have you made any progress on something you've been working on? Pictures, excerpts, and descriptions are all more than welcome!

For discussion this time around: Picking your projects. How do you decide what you're going to make next? Do you make one project at a time, or several at once? Does project size ever factor into the project(s) you pick? If so, how?

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime



Rihanna: "Umbrella"

Open Wide...

In the News

Here is some stuff in the news today...

[Content Note: Extreme weather; video may autoplay at link] The US East Coast is getting battered by another snowstorm: "Another week, another snowstorm, another mess. This is the continuing story of the winter of 2015. Boston is in the cross hairs again, but winter storm warnings are in place across large portions of the Northeast, including Massachusetts, New York, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine. The National Weather Service forecasts 12 to 16 inches of snow by the time the storm ends Tuesday. For upstate New York, the numbers are 8 to 14 inches. ...'These storms that we're getting are unprecedented,' [Boston Mayor Marty Walsh] said. 'We've never seen this type of snow in the city of Boston at any other time in the history of our city.'"

[CN: War] The debate continues about whether to arm Ukraine: "German Chancellor Angela Merkel is set to argue in Washington on Monday against arming Ukraine in its conflict against Russian-backed rebels, while in Brussels EU ministers held off tightening sanctions to give peace talks a chance. Merkel's message that sending Western weapons to Kiev risks escalating the conflict is likely to get a sympathetic hearing when she meets President Barack Obama later in the day. But critics of Obama's cautious foreign policy approach are already demanding decisive U.S. action to help Kiev fight the separatists in eastern Ukraine, even if this deepens a standoff with Russian President Vladimir Putin." Well, many of those "critics" are warmongering jackasses, so.

[CN: Worker exploitation] "On Sunday, workers at two BP oil refineries in Ohio and Indiana walked out as part of a nationwide oil worker strike being led by the United Steelworkers Union (USW). Citing unfair labor practices and dangerous conditions, including leaks and explosions, the approximately 1,440 workers will join nearly 4,000 that began striking a week ago on February 1. The first nationwide strike by oil refinery workers since 1980, the addition of BP's Whiting, Indiana, refinery and the company's joint-venture refinery with Husky Energy in Toledo, Ohio, brings the total number of plants with strikers to 11, including refineries accounting for about 13 percent of total U.S. oil refining capacity. The original strike included workers in California, Kentucky, Texas, and Washington."

Something something Brian Williams and more "embellishments" about his life experiences. Well, at least Brian Williams now has a real story to tell about coming under fire. "The tweets were incoming and relentless..."

[CN: Racism] This is a really cool piece about how Franklin came to be the Peanuts' first black character. "That week the comic strip featured a story line in which Charlie Brown's sister Sally had thrown his beach ball into the sea. Then something that was, for the time, radical and ground breaking occurred. His name was Franklin. And he came into the strip without fanfare, and without any notice or comment concerning his race. He and Charlie Brown struck up a friendship just like any two kids who meet on the beach might do."

[CN: Homophobia; dehumanization] You know, I am not surprised by much when it comes to homophobic shitlords saying disgusting things, but this managed to surprise even me: "Pastor Claims Gay People Are Possessed by 'Fart Demons' That Can Drive Pigs to Suicide." Um, wow.

And now for something that will cleanse your palate after that mess: "Someone with Chalk is Drawing Quirky Characters on the Streets of Ann Arbor, Michigan." That someone is David Zinn, a street artist who spends his spare time giving lessons to kids on how to draw like he does. Love.

Do you love The Princess Bride and also love Cary Elwes? Then you will probably like reading this interview with Elwes very much! "I know that the epitaph on my tombstone will be 'As you wish,' and that's great!"

[CN: Pet loss] There is a site which will make a plushy replica of your departed pets. Which I suppose some people might find creepy, and others might find very sweet. Not that the two have to be mutually exclusive!

I love looking at pictures of the interior of tiny houses, and this one in Japan is particularly fascinating.

And finally! This video of an octopus revealing herself from camouflage is absolutely incredible!

Open Wide...