On Mia Love

[Content Note: Racism; misogyny.]

Seriously?

Y’all tripping.

Ok, not everyone, but…

Well, let me back up a little. Mia Love of Utah has been elected the first black woman to represent the GOP in Congress. I read a good bit of online media directed at African American audiences. Since Love’s election, some have asked what it means to/for black people, is her election a milestone, should we be glad, etc.

And I have been surprised at the number of people who have scolded and even excoriated black people who are not excited about her election.

I am here to say, you CANNOT have it both ways.

How many times have black people been accused of supporting a candidate “just because zie’s black?” How many times have we heard that we don’t have any political savvy, we just vote based on what the Democrats tell us and not real issues? How many times do we still hear that race is the only reason the President was elected?

But… when a black woman is elected on a platform that doesn’t speak to many of us, we get fussed at for not celebrating… because she’s black? I’m confused.

No, I am not excited about Mia Love’s election. Love is anti-choice, anti-gay, speaks in the not-so-coded language of “handouts” and “burdens,” and posits herself as living in some sort of post-racial world. I am a pro-choice, pro-equal rights, pro-social safety net woman living in a world that is decidedly not post-racial. Why in the world would I be happy about her election? It makes me wary, at best.

Now, I don’t like the sexist (and perhaps racist) language and ideology that implies that she is a “mindless” token who is just going to be used. But, even then, some of the language that is used to defend her and refute such charges relies on the same mindset—black people don’t like her because we have a monolithic brain and she dares to be outside our plantation-mentality that renders us tokens of the Democrats.*

Look, if Mary Landrieu wins the run-off for the Senate in my home state of Louisiana, no one will expect any of the white Republicans there to be happy just because a white woman got elected. Nor will they expect white Democrats to be happy if her Republican opponent, who is a white man, wins office. But millions of black people and I who identify as more leftist are wrong because we aren’t throwing parties for Mia Love.

Please stop. It’s hurting my brain that, before election day, I was scolded for not seeing beyond race to look at issues and now, I’m being scolded for not seeing beyond issues to look at race.

Some people are logicking all wrong.

________

*I’ve written before about how I detest the conservative-speak that exceptionalizes black conservatives while demonizing the rest of us.

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime

[Content Note: There is a strobe-light effect in this video.]



Stacey Q: "Two of Hearts"

Open Wide...

In the News

Here is some stuff in the news today...

[Content Note: Extreme weather; death] At least five people have died as a result of a terrible snowstorm hitting the eastern US: "The first snowstorm of the season has resulted in five deaths in this area so far and possibly set an all-time U.S. record for snowfall. Three people had heart attacks from shoveling snow, officials said. The snow is still falling with more than 5 feet already on the ground, and some areas south of the city are expected to get a year's worth of snow—almost 6 feet—in just three days. Temperatures in all 50 states fell to freezing or below overnight. ...Crews say some areas have so much snow that it's like plowing a brick wall. Rescuers, who have been using snowmobiles, also have been walking car to car to try to dig out people stuck in their vehicles."

A picture is worth 1,000 words: Here is a dog greeting a literal wall of snow outside her front door.

[CN: Police brutality; racism] St. Louis Mayor Francis Slay says "he expects 'widespread civil disobedience' following the announcement on whether a white police officer will face criminal charges for killing an unarmed black 18-year-old in Ferguson, Missouri. Giving one of the starkest warnings so far by a regional official about what they expect to follow a grand jury decision that is anticipated in the coming days, Francis Slay also said he had asked for 400 national guard troops to protect his city during potential unrest." Again: This is unnecessarily antagonistic, and the government officials who keep saying these things will not, if something happens, be held accountable for their provocation, but will instead be hailed as prescient. Which is appalling.

[CN: Disablism; misogynoir; police brutality] Another person with mental illness is dead following an altercation with police, and, once again, the police account differs dramatically from the account of the victim's family.

[CN: Disablism; choice policing] David Perry, the father of a boy with Down syndrome and a journalist on disability issues, writes a thoughtful piece about false binaries in decisions regarding aborting fetuses with Down syndrome. Spoiler Alert: We need better support for people with disabilities, and for parents of children with disabilities.

[CN: Class warfare] A new study has found what all of us already knew: "Millennials are stuck between having a financially responsible mindset and having the resources and discipline to pull off long-term results." That's a nice way of putting it. The fact is, survival spending and savings are incompatible.

And finally! Here is a kitten in an epic battle with hir own reflection. LOL! Oh cats.

Open Wide...

Finish This Sentence

The number one issue I wish my government would more effectively address is...

...food insecurity. For so many reasons. But chief among them is that people can't thrive, in any way, in the ways that are important to them, when they are hungry. And a thriving society needs to be full of thriving people. Out of basic decency, and out of collective interest.

(As always, there is no one right answer. And if your number one issue has already been mentioned a lot, and you'd like to note that and choose something else, just so it's included in the thread, please feel welcome to do so.)

Open Wide...

Senate Defeats Keystone Bill by One Vote

This, of course, is while they still hold the majority:

Senate Democrats, by a single vote, stopped legislation that would have approved construction of the Keystone XL pipeline, one of the most fractious and expensive battles of the Obama presidency.

The vote represented a victory for the environmental movement, but the fight had taken on larger dimensions as a proxy war between Republicans, who argued that the project was vital for job creation, and President Obama, who had delayed a decision on building it.

...Republicans vowed to bring back the Keystone bill as soon as they return in January, when they will hold the majority. Speaking on the Senate floor moments after the vote, Senator Mitch McConnell, Republican of Kentucky and the incoming majority leader, said that he would immediately bring up a Keystone bill when the new Senate convenes.

"For so many good reasons, we'll be back with this after the first of the year," said Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, a Republican who is poised to replace Ms. Landrieu as head of the Senate Energy Committee. "And I believe that the momentum we've gained means we'll see progress and see this bill passed."
At which point, the President will likely veto it. And there will likely not be enough votes to override his veto. But Republicans aren't going to let this one go. It's become too perfect a symbol for who holds the political power in D.C.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of an Alice in Wonderland sand sculpture, prominently featuring the Cheshire Cat

Hosted by a sand sculpture of the Cheshire Cat.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

What's for dinner? Or whatever the next meal of the day is in your part of the world.

Since it's cold as a very cold thing with lots of little cold bits all over it, I've got a chicken stew cooking in the crockpot. There's nothing better than warm stew on a frigid day.

Open Wide...

Philae Detects Organic Molecules on Comet

Well, this is pretty neat!

The Philae lander has detected organic molecules on the surface of its comet, scientists have confirmed.

Carbon-containing "organics" are the basis of life on Earth and may give clues to chemical ingredients delivered to our planet early in its history.

The compounds were picked up by a German-built instrument designed to "sniff" the comet's thin atmosphere.

Other analyses suggest the comet's surface is largely water-ice covered with a thin dust layer.

...[T]he team was still trying to interpret the results. It has not been disclosed which molecules have been found, or how complex they are.

But the results are likely to provide insights into the possible role of comets in contributing some of the chemical building blocks to the primordial mix from which life evolved on the early Earth.
Eeeeeeeee that's so cool!

There is also news about Philae's fate, having landed in the shadow of a rock face on the comet's surface, which means its solar panels aren't getting sunlight and its battery will run out of juice in short order:
Scientists are hopeful however that as Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko approaches the Sun in coming months, Philae's solar panels will see sunlight again. This might allow the batteries to re-charge, and enable the lander to perform science once more.

"There's a trade off - once it gets too hot, Philae will die as well. There is a sweet spot," said [Professor Mark McCaughrean, senior science adviser to ESA].

He added: "Given the fact that there is a factor of six, seven, eight in solar illumination and the last action we took was to rotate the body of Philae around to get the bigger solar panel in, I think it's perfectly reasonable to think it may well happen."

"By being in the shadow of the cliff, it might even help us, that we might not get so hot, even at full solar illumination. But if you don't get so hot that you don't overheat, have you got enough solar power to charge the system."
I am very excited to see what happens! I mean, I know I am a HUGE NERD and everything, but I cannot stop jittering with enthusiasm every time I get to read about humankind being able to DO SCIENCE on a comet 317 million miles away from Earth. It's just extraordinary.

Open Wide...

Today in Not Helping

[Content Note: Rape culture; hostility to consent; descriptions of sexual assault at link.]

RAINN, which bills itself as "the nation's largest anti-sexual assault organization," has been really disappointing recently—see here and here for examples—and I am deeply troubled by this interview at Think Progress with RAINN's founder and president Scott Berkowitz, who was asked to comment on the rape allegations against Bill Cosby.

There are a number of comments that I found less than optimal, especially in Berkowitz's willingness to indulge the idea that there are some victims who don't need believing, but these comments were particularly odious:

Think Progress: Given the volume of the allegations, the specificity of the accounts, the similarities among all these women's stories, everything we know about how rape typically occurs, and, especially, the fact that these women no longer have any legal recourse, why do you think people don't believe these assaults really happened? Are people blinded by love of Bill Cosby?

Berkowitz: You know, I think that he's well-loved. And it's always hard to hear bad things about someone you admire. And he's been such a part of American culture for decades. When I first read about allegations years ago, my first reaction was, "God, I hope it's not true." But the number of accusations, and the similarities in stories really create a lot of circumstantial evidence. So I'd really love to see some good investigative reporters try and dig into it more and see, if there are other victims out there, if they can shed any more light.
Even giving Berkowitz the most favorable interpretation of "God, I hope it's not true"—i.e. that he was hoping women hadn't been assaulted as opposed to hoping a man he liked didn't disappoint him by being a rapist—he's necessarily saying, "God, I hope these women are lying."

I know, I know, that's not what he's intending to say—but it is nonetheless implicit in saying "I hope it's not true that Bill Cosby raped someone." There's no way for rape allegations to be made and for them to not be true, unless the allegations have been invented.

Given the ubiquity of the fallacy that women routinely invent rape allegations, especially against famous men, that's not a narrative that the president of "the nation's largest anti-sexual assault organization" should be peddling. Even inadvertently.

And I'm frankly not so convinced about how inadvertent it was, considering Berkowitz also notes he was convinced of the veracity of the allegations made against Cosby in part by "the fact that they are doing this, they're coming forward, not for, apparently, not for self-interest, but to try and alert the public, to try and sway public opinion."

As opposed to those women who do come forward for self-interest. Ahem.

Which is only the first part of the problem with the above-quoted response, because Berkowitz of course goes on to say he hopes that investigative reporters "dig into it more" to see "if there are other victims out there."

No. No they should not.

Journalists should absolutely listen to and believe other victims who share their stories, and vigorously report those stories with the victims' consent.

But—and this is more than mere semantics—journalists should not go "digging" to find victims who have not made their stories public. The women who have made their stories public have been subjected to all manner of harassment and abuse, and that is something that they made a calculated decision to weather by going public. Again and again.

Trying to find victims and expose them under the auspices of "shedding light" stands to revictimize women who don't want to stand in that spotlight.

Listen to victims who come forward is good advice. Pursue victims who have not come forward is not good advice. And it's a distinction that the president of an anti-rape advocacy organization should keenly understand.

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Olivia the White Farm Cat curled up on a red hand towel in the bathroom sink
Olivia, just sitting in the sink. Like a cat.

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

[Content Note: Class warfare.]

"I'm someone that believes there's nothing more ennobling to a person than a job. And to make sure that able-bodied adults without dependents at home know that here in the state of Indiana, we want to partner with them in their success. You know, it's the old story: Give someone a fish, and they'll eat for a day. Teach them to fish, they'll eat for a lifetime. I think this is an idea whose time has come here in the state of Indiana."—Republican Indiana Governor Mike Pence, on the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration's new policy, which will go into effect at the beginning of next year, to "no longer request a waiver to the federal work requirement for certain people who use the SNAP program. Up to 65,000 single Hoosiers could lose food stamp benefits unless they are working 20 hours a week or attending job training."

Not only is this a classist, racist, misogynist, disablist policy which is being sold on the fallacy that unemployed people simply refuse to work, but it's a classist, racist, misogynist, disablist policy which is being enacted in a state where 1 in 6 people rely on food pantries and meal service programs.

A state in which 59% of households with an employed person using social services include at least one full-time worker.

There are not enough jobs in Indiana for everyone who wants one, and many of the jobs that are available do not page livable wages.

Governor Pence may believe "there's nothing more ennobling to a person than a job," but he's wrong. What's more ennobling is a job that pays enough money for the person doing it to support hirself and hir family.

What's more ennobling is treating people like human beings who deserve to live, without constant worry of how they're going to survive until tomorrow.

Shove your goddamn fish up your ass, Governor. People in need do not need Sunday School lessons. They need jobs, they need food, they need shelter, they need healthcare, and they need a robust social safety net.

And they need a governor who gets that.

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime

[Content Note: There is a strobe-light effect in this video.]



Rob Base and DJ E-Z: "It Takes Two"

Open Wide...

Not Good Enough

[Content Note: Fat hatred.]

After a number of complaints, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has temporarily shelved a website called "Lean Works!" which "offered an 'obesity cost calculator' to help American bosses tally financial losses linked to their overweight employees."

The federal program drew recent criticism from some nutritionists and advocates for [fat] Americans who claimed the site and its obesity calculator fueled workplace discrimination and perhaps even led some companies to fire fat people.

...[CDC spokesperson Brittany Behm] said via email that content once posted at Lean Works! "is under review," adding: "The calculator is also under review and will be potentially updated with new information, technology."

"The recent attention to the LEAN Works! program caused us to put this part of the website at the top of the list for review, hence why it is currently down," Behm wrote. "…The potential misuse of this information is something we will certainly consider in our upcoming content review."
Not good enough. This website needs to be blown the fuck up and never even proposed as a serious policy measure ever again.

There is no sound justification for the argument that fat people are costing their employers more money, in actual dollars or productivity. (Though, coincidentally, there sure are persistent stereotypes of fat people being unhealthy and lazy!) But here is the CDC using tax dollars—the same precious tax dollars that fat people are supposedly wasting with our very existence—to build a website in order to calculate something that isn't actually happening, in order to underwrite a prejudice that will only create more barriers to employment and equal pay for fat people.

This shit doesn't exist in a vacuum. This is part of a sustained eliminationist campaign against fat people in the United States, which has seen the American Medical Association declare obesity a disease and the First Lady writing in the pages of the Wall Street Journal that fat people are a "problem is solved once and for all" for American businesses.

We are continually and dishonestly identified as a drain on society, a threat, a problem that needs to be solved. This is the language of eliminationism that has been used by privileged classes against marginalized groups for as long as such political, social, and cultural scapegoating has been documented.

There is an abundance of evidence that most fat people will never be able to achieve and/or permanently maintain a not-fat body. There is an abundance of evidence that the stress of being incessantly shamed and policed negatively affects fat people's health. There is an abundance of evidence that fat hatred kills.

And the insistent refusal of policymakers to acknowledge that evidence tells me that they're pretty much fine with that.

[H/T to Shaker MMC.]

Open Wide...

Running the Line

[Content Note: Racism; misogyny; classism.]

Did y’all miss me?* Did you wonder what in the world has elle been doing all this time?

Amongst many things, I was writing a book! A now published book! And I am grateful to Liss for allowing me to share details about the book, my “other” baby for most of the 21st century.

I am from rural Louisiana, the daughter of working-class, processing plant workers. My daddy worked in a lumber (timber? I never know which one to use!) processing plant that made particle board. And my mama worked in a poultry processing plant. It was her life’s (paid) work that shaped the historian that I am—one who specializes in African American, southern, women’s and labor history.

My book, entitled We Just Keep Running the Line: Black Southern Women and the Poultry Processing Industry, is a much-revised, edited, and expanded version of my dissertation. It is about black women from rural North Louisiana who worked in poultry processing in the South Arkansas/North Louisiana region. I wanted to write a history of the industry that explored the lives and labors of the black women who worked the lines inside the plants. Why did they go into that work? I wondered. And how in the world did they stay?

I had learned, over the course of my life, that we were to be unquestioningly grateful for the industry. If it weren’t for the plant owners’ generous act of establishing their companies in our desperate, desolate home areas, whatever would we do? We should, in our thinking, maximize the benefits and minimize the costs. But that couldn’t work for me—my mother, my aunts, my neighbors, my friends’ parents weren’t just nameless parts of a big poultry processing machine. They were human beings who worked and parented and negotiated and lost and triumphed and lived. My book is about them.

At the heart of my book are a set of oral histories/interviews with poultry processing workers and those closest to them. These are the stories I treasured, that I wanted to share, that helped me in obvious ways academically and professionally, but more significantly, that helped me in understanding who I am and the people and region from which I come. Following is an excerpt in which I try to explain why I wrote this book and, more importantly, why I wrote it the way that I did. It is, indeed, part business history. But, in the intimate look it gives into so many lives, it is so much more.

Even though the benefits to the community had been more visible to me than the costs, I was cognizant of its costs on a personal level. Money made from poultry processing helped keep me clothed, sheltered, and fed, allowed me the room to explore my interests via financial support from my mama, kept me afloat when I went away to Louisiana’s premiere boarding school. Most significantly, my undergraduate education was financed by a four-year, full scholarship sponsored by Con Agra. Only as I was older could I see the costs, the disheartening comparisons. I had to reflect on all the nice clothes I was careful to keep separate from my mother’s which bore the indescribable smell of freshly-slaughtered meat; my carefully manicured fingers that sometimes had to rub my mother’s aching and swollen ones; the fact that, in terms of paid work, I have largely been able to do what I love to do because Mama did what she had to do. I wanted to learn more about the costs to her and women like her, how they felt about their work, their lives, their sacrifices. I wanted to make those costs visible in the same ways that the benefits and our ongoing, obedient gratitude to the poultry industry were.

My desires were bolstered when I approached veteran poultry processing worker Janet Strong about this project ‘Somebody should write about this,’ she told me, ‘Should help us. Should tell somebody what they do to us.’ But before this ‘somebody’ could write about it, I had to collect and listen to the stories of women who had been connected to the industry. As numerous scholars have noted, such testimonies, ‘whether directly to the reader or through the offices of a collaborating writer,’** have been crucial in bringing the stories of marginalized groups into the center. Though she speaks of a different type of exploitation, Danielle McGuire argues that, ‘African American women reclaimed their bodies and their humanity by testifying…. [They] loudly resisted what Martin Luther King, Jr., called the ‘thingification’ of their humanity.’*** Over and over, the women with whom I spoke did just that—insisted that they were human, valuable, and worthy of decent treatment. In response to Janet Strong’s assertion that someone ‘[s]hould tell somebody what they do to us,’ my answer became that there was no better ‘somebody’ than the women themselves.
If you are interested in purchasing the book, it is available via Powell's as a hardcover and via Amazon and Barnes & Noble in hardcover and e-book format.

__________

*I do realize that I have been away so long that many of you might not know me. Hello! I’m elle. I’m a professor, historian, feminist, mother, amateur cook, and angsty sort and I am so pleased to meet you! I also tend to write like an academic; forgive the footnotes, but I promise they contain good stuff!

** Kimberly Nance, Can Literature Promote Justice: Trauma Narrative in Latin American Testimonio (Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, 2006), 7; See also the works collected in George Guggleberger, ed., The Real Thing: Testimonial Discourse and Latin America (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1996); Anne Valk and Leslie Brown, eds., Living with Jim Crow: African American Women and Memories of the Segregated South (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2010); Danielle L. McGuire, At the Dark End of the Street: Black Women, Rape, and Resistance—A New History of the Civil Rights Movement from Rosa Parks to the Rise of Black Power (New York: Alfred A. Knopf: 2010).

*** McGuire, xviii-xix.

Open Wide...

In the News

Here is some stuff in the news today...

Leslie Feinberg, who identified as an anti-racist white, working-class, secular Jewish, transgender, lesbian, female, revolutionary communist, has died at age 65. The Advocate has an obituary penned by hir partner and spouse Minnie Bruce Pratt here. Hir last words were: "Remember me as a revolutionary communist."

Alice Lee, influential Alabama lawyer and church leader, and sister of author Harper Lee, has died at age 103. She "practiced law until a few years ago. For a time she was Alabama's oldest practicing attorney. Lee also helped guard the privacy of her famous sister Harper Nelle, who in 1961 won the Pulitzer Prize for" To Kill a Mockingbird.

[Content Note: Police brutality; racism. Covers next two paragraphs.] The FBI has issued a warning that the grand jury decision regarding Officer Darren Wilson, who killed Michael Brown in August, is likely to "lead some extremist protesters to threaten and even attack police officers or federal agents." The warning is being reported in many outlets in a way that suggests the FBI is warning about Ferguson protestors, but that is not the case: "Peaceful protesters could be caught in the middle, and electrical facilities or water treatment plants could also become targets. In addition, so-called 'hacktivists' like the group 'Anonymous' could try to launch cyber-attacks against authorities. 'The announcement of the grand jury's decision … will likely be exploited by some individuals to justify threats and attacks against law enforcement and critical infrastructure,' the FBI says in an intelligence bulletin issued in recent days. 'This also poses a threat to those civilians engaged in lawful or otherwise constitutionally protected activities.' The FBI bulletin expresses concern only over those who would exploit peaceful protests, not the masses of demonstrators who will want to legitimately, lawfully and collectively express their views on the grand jury's decision."

Still, with Democratic Governor Jay Nixon having preemptively declared a state of emergency, and activating the National Guard, the message about protestors being communicated by local authorities is clear. Nixon declaring a state of emergency is also extremely antagonistic. If, if, something happens, it cannot be divorced from this decision. But it will be.

[CN: Violence; war] An attack was made on a Jerusalem synagogue this morning by two Palestinian men armed with axes, knives, and a gun. The two men, who were members of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, were killed in a shoot-out with police, after they killed four people and injured a number of others. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has vowed a "heavy hand" response, starting with an order to demolish the homes of the attackers.

[CN: Class warfare] Income inequality in the United States continues to worsen. And, despite conservatives' incessant caterwauling about taxation, it's because taxes are not high enough in the US, and thus our social safety net is shit.

[CN: Heterocentrism; violence] Convicted murderer Charles Manson has been issued a marriage license. I don't believe in the "sanctity" of straight marriage, but, if I did, THIS would undermine it. This is what straight privilege looks like, folks: An imprisoned murderer with a swastika tattooed on his forehead can get a marriage license one week after legal marriage for same-sex couples was rolled BACKWARDS by a court who ruled that marriage was for the purposes of procreation. Fuck. This.

[CN: Voter suppression] The Republicans are already trying to figure out how to rework election law to rig the 2016 election. The Electoral College needs to go the way of the dodo altogether, like, yesterday.

[CN: Misogyny] While I spent the entirety of yesterday getting hammered for writing about sartorial misogyny, IN A SHOCKING TWIST, this white dude is getting ALL THE COOKIES for his commentary on the same subject, after revealing he wore the same suit to his job as a TV anchor every day for an entire year and no one noticed.

If you want to see the Leonid Meteor Shower tonight, but don't want to go out in the cold, you can watch it live care of The Slooh Community Observatory starting today at 8:00pm EST.

And finally: Jumping baby jumping dog! Hahahahahaha!

Open Wide...

It's Cold

It is very cold in Northwest Indiana right now, along with much of the rest of the country. Our front storm door is covered in ice, even though we've not had much precipitation, and I'm wrapped up in fuzzy slippers and a blanket just to stay warm inside the house, because the wind is just brutal.

In New York and Michigan, lake effect snow is closing roads, and it's colder in some parts of Texas than it is in Boston. But all 50 states are getting a dose of it today.

It's supposed to warm up here by the weekend, but at the moment, it feels like the dead of January in the middle of November. BOO.

How are you doing, weather-wise? INSERT YOUR COMPLAINTS HERE!

Open Wide...

Two Facts

1. David Brooks is still being employed by the New York Times to write a garbage column.

2. This week, David Brooks is mystified by why, in the wake of the Republicans' midterm win, President Obama is not rolling over and making it easier for them to steamroll him with their terrible nightmare policies.

They say failure can be a good teacher, but, so far, the Obama administration is opting out of the course. The post-midterm period has been one of the most bizarre of the Obama presidency. President Obama has racked up some impressive foreign-policy accomplishments, but, domestically and politically, things are off the rails.

...Usually presidents at the end of their terms get less partisan, not more.
OFF THE RAILS!

I'm no highly paid pundit for the New York Times, but maybe the lesson that President Obama learned from the midterms is that capitulating to a Republican agenda, even slightly, even for the grand golden objective of bipartisanship, is not a winning strategy for Democrats. Just a thought!

Brooks, who loves to Concern Troll on behalf of the Democrats, wrings his hands about the President's plan to enact immigration reform via executive action.
I sympathize with what Obama is trying to do substantively, but the process of how it's being done is ruinous.

Republicans would rightly take it as a calculated insult and yet more political ineptitude. Everybody would go into warfare mode. We'll get two more years of dysfunction that will further arouse public disgust and antigovernment fervor (making a Republican presidency more likely).
Hahahaha thank you for your concern that governing like a Democrat might make a Republican presidency more likely, David Brooks! You're so thoughtful!

As for me, I fully support President Obama insulting the Republicans as often and as thoroughly as possible for the next two years.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of a sand sculpture of E.T. 'phoning home' by pressing a long finger against a telephone keypad

Hosted by a sand sculpture of E.T.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Suggested by Shaker Quinalla: "What is your favorite cleaning tip (can be method, product, etc.)? Did you figure it out yourself or did someone share it with you?"

My favorite cleaning tip is that dish detergent will remove greasy stains from shirts. (This is a Very Important piece of information for anyone with a prominent boob shelf which is prone to catching food.) If you pre-treat the stain with a little dish detergent before putting it through the laundry, that greasy stain will come right out—even if it's been through the washer and dryer before!

Open Wide...

Discussion Thread: Misogyny at Work

[Content Note: Misogyny; workplace harassment.]

I have been getting a lot of pushback on Twitter (I know—you're so shocked!) regarding my post about Dr. Matt Taylor's inappropriate shirt. As always, one of the most common refrains is, "Not all women object to it!" or "I know a woman who doesn't find it offensive!" or some variation thereof.

While acknowledging there are definitely some woman who just don't think it's a problem (whoops), one of the observations I made on Twitter is that there are lots of women who will defend shit like that shirt just to avoid being harassed like those of us criticizing it are. There are an awful lot of rewards for being the "cool chick" who isn't "overly sensitive" like those other angry bitches, and playing the Exceptional Woman is itself an effect of sexism in the workplace. Feeling obliged to "okay" men's sexism can be a self-protection mechanism.

And, you know, many of us have been there and played that role, because it was just fucking easier.

And this is why many of us now advocate so vociferously against even the little (ahem) incidents of misogyny in professional environments—because we intimately understand how a preponderance of them conspires to coerce (some) women into feeling unable to safely address misogyny in their workplaces.

So, here's a thread to talk about that. What "little things" have happened in your workplace that create a hostile environment and make you feel like you either have to play the "cool chick" who never gets offended, or obliges your silence, because criticism turns you into a target?

Open Wide...