Good Morning! Or Whatever!

Please enjoy this video of a very spoiled (but not so spoiled that he doesn't listen) Great Dane named Dinky throw a hilarious tantrum because his dad is giving Ro-Ro lovies and not him.


Video Description: A middle-aged white man sits in a comfy chair beside a couch. In front of him, sitting with his back to him, is a harlequin Great Dane named Ro-Ro, whom the man is petting. Next to him, half on and half off the couch, is a black with white hightlights Great Dane named Dinky, who is grumpily complaining in low vocalizations that he is not being pet.

Dinky growls and yowls pitifully as the man tells him: "Lay down, I can love Ro-Ro. No. You get up there and lay down and let Ro have a turn. You get up there and lay down..." Rowr rowr rowr rowr. "You let Ro-Ro have a turn!" Dinky leans forward kisses his face. "Get back up on that couch!" Dinky backs up onto the couch.

"You get on that couch." Grrrrrrmph. Dinky looks at his mom, behind the camera. "Don't look at Mom." Mom laughs. "She's..." Rowr rowr rowr rowr. "You just lay down. I can give Ro-Ro lovies, too." Dinky circles on the couch and lays down with a grumping harrumph. "You're just tired and crabby."

This goes on for another minute, until Dinky's grumbling reaches a fevered pitch and he dramatically flops back onto the couch petulantly. His mom and dad laugh. Dinky grumbles, wagging his tail. Dinky is proud of himself now and being silly. Ro-Ro rolls over on his back. Fun times for everyone!

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of the Marvel comic book supervillain Ultron

Hosted by Ultron.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

When is the last time you treated yourself, in a big or small way, and what did you do?

Define "treat yourself" however you like. For some of us, it could be buying ourselves something we don't really need; for others, a massage; for others, giving oneself permission to leave the dirty dishes 'til morning.

Open Wide...

It Is Time for a Flula Break!

Flula, a young, thin, white man speaking in German-accented English directly to the camera while lying in what looks like a daybed with a frilly cover: I need pants. Yesterday I did have an accident with my pants. It— Not like a [gestures downward with his hand] bowel, bowel move; no liquid accident. It was a dancing— I was dancing, and then [makes an upward motion with his hand] rrrrip! Whoop! Down in the place that is, you know, needing not rips? [meaningful look]

So I'm purchase new pants today; I go a stores—I visit, ahh, the Gap, I did go. I see pants; they are nice, but ahh, they are nice, but the reißverschluss, the zippy [makes zipping motion with hand] was broken.

And so I did say to the Gap, the Gap woman... I said, "Hello. I like your pants here; however, the zippy is broken. May I receive discount for, you know, for this?" And she looked me like [makes disgusted face] like a what? And she say, "What—you want to have your cake and eat it, too?" And then she continue folding sweaters.

[makes confused face] What? [confused noise] What? Have a cake and eat it, too? Who is caring of cake? This is my moment of needing pants! I'm not in a moment of needing desserts.

Cake? Who— You want to have a cake and eat it, too? Well, first here this purposes of cake is the eating! Why shall I else have the cake? This is why I would like a cake. If I like a cake, I would like to eat it!

What do you do with cake? What do you do with cake, Gap Lady? You bake a cake... "Finished! Frosting!" [mimes frosting a cake] "Oh, no eating!" Open window and voppitabop! [mimes tossing cake out open window] Hello to street! And cars and beep beep splat splat! Then some hours later: Squirrels.

What? No, this is not how cake is working! This is not how my pants is working! I would like to have this pants.

I would like— I do not want to have the cake and eat it, too; I would like to have the pants and wear them, too. As this is purpose of pants. This is why pants are existing. So please sell to me. I will fix the zippy. It's not hard.
Then some hours later: Squirrels. Oh my god. LOL FOREVERRRRRRRRRRR.

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

[Content Note: Misogyny; harassment.]

"There is widespread acknowledgement of the rampant sexism in the [tech and venture capital industries], but even wider-scale abdication of responsibility for it. The structure and cadence of the culture remains accepting of sexist attitudes. When these attitudes materialize into sexual harassment and assault, the target is left unprotected, and eventually ostracized. She becomes responsible both for defending herself against the advances of the offending party and against the mob that rises to protect their aligned interests. She is given the choice to suffer the indignities of being treated as a sexual object amongst peers and colleagues, or to be persecuted for objecting to it. If she fiercely asserts her rights to be there, her boundaries in doing so, her very fierceness is critiqued and used as a crowbar, evidence that she's—wait for it—not tough enough to handle the culture."—Bardot Smith, in "Silicon Valley's Cult of Male Ego."

Which I, coincidentally, just had happened to read after the interview with Barbara Annis.

I'm sure you can all imagine and appreciate the abundant cascade of mirthless laughter that accompanied the delightful juxtaposition.

Open Wide...

New Memo to Women

[Content Note: Misogyny.]

All you need to do to succeed in business is be yourself. And don't worry—it will totally work because: "I don't see men resisting female leadership. I mean, sure, do we have the odd dinosaur, yes. But for the most part, I see men being very interested and willing when it comes to including women, and they see it as a benefit."

So says Barbara Annis, a gender intelligence expert and the Chair Emeritus of the Women's Leadership Board at Harvard Kennedy School.

Just lean in and be yourself! That's all it takes! Men are very interested and willing to include you! So if you are not a wild success, it's definitely your fault!

Have a nice day.

Open Wide...

Nope

I know, I know—I promise I will shut up about it after this—but is anyone else super creeped out by the fact that reviewers are recommending Gone Girl as "a perfect date night movie," or some variation thereof? WHAT THE SHIT?

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Sophie the Torbie Cat sitting on my lap and Olivia the White Farm Cat snuggling on a pillow beside us
There is never a shortage of kitties available for cuddling at Shakes Manor.

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime



Shudder to Think: "The Ballad of Maxwell Demon"

Open Wide...

In the News

Here is some stuff in the news today...

[Content Note: Racism; guns; death] Goddammit: "The Justice Department is not expected to bring civil rights charges against George Zimmerman in the 2012 shooting death of Trayvon Martin, according to three law enforcement officials, despite allegations that the killing was racially motivated. The federal investigation of Zimmerman was opened two years ago by the department's civil rights division, but officials said there is insufficient evidence to bring federal charges. The investigation technically remains open, but it is all but certain the department will close it." What is most infuriating about this to me is that the threshold for "evidence" for something that is manifestly obvious is absurd. Of course it mattered that Trayvon Martin was black. Of course it did.

[CN: Illness; death] People in the US are extremely concerned about a single case of Ebola, and that is understandable, but also there are five people being infected every hour in Sierra Leone, and we really need to be sending more resources to help address the epidemic there. Also: Nearly 4,000 children in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone have been orphaned by the epidemic, and UNICEF "fears the number of orphans could double this month."

[CN: Animal imperilment] An estimated 35,000 walruses have crowded onto a single Alaskan beach because there is not enough sea ice to sustain them. "The extraordinary sighting—the biggest known exodus of walruses to dry land ever observed in the Arctic under US control—arrived as the summer sea ice fell to its sixth lowest in the satellite record last month. 'Those animals have essentially run out of offshore sea ice, and have no other choice but to come ashore,' said Chadwick Jay, a research ecologist in Alaska with the US Geological Survey." There is a further risk to the population if the walruses are spooked and stampede. This is so fucking sad.

In good news: "A program that offered long-acting no-cost contraception to U.S. girls and women age 15 to 19 reduced the teenage pregnancy rate by 79 percent over five years and cut the abortion rate by 77 percent, according to the results of a new study. ...The new study comes from the Contraceptive CHOICE Project conducted in the St. Louis area. It was designed to see if teen pregnancy rates could be brought down by aggressively providing information on contraceptives and offering contraception for free." Huh! Who woulda thunk that education about and access to contraception made a difference in pregnancy and abortion rates? OH ONLY EVERYONE WHO IS PRO-CHOICE EVER? Welp!

Republican Speaker of the House John Boehner is reportedly trying to convince Jeb Bush to run for president, because Boehner "sees Bush as undeniably the strongest, most viable candidate who could pull the party together after a bruising primary and take on a formidable Hillary Clinton." (Who hasn't announced a candidacy.) Also: George W. Bush thinks his little bro totes wants to be prez. Well, I guess that settles it!

These two restaurateurs are opening a restaurant where they will pay their waitstaff a liveable wage, offer healthcare benefits, and give them some paid vacation days and sick time. That sounds good! They will also ban tipping. Really? Hmm. I think as a customer I'd prefer a "you're not obliged to tip, but you certainly can if you like" model. I dunno. It's not like there aren't plenty of other service professions where people get tipped, even if they're already making a liveable wage.

Here is Gillian Anderson talking about sexism in the entertainment industry. For the record, I would not talk to her about either The X-Files or Jamie Dornan. I would talk to her about how she says brave things about sexism in the entertainment industry.

This may be a useful starting point for you if you've got stray and/or feral cats in your area and want to figure out a way to help.

And finally! This is an amazing and moving video of workers with Animal Aid Unlimited India helping a dog who'd fallen into a pool of tar that had hardened, leaving him stuck to the ground. Dogs are incredibly resilient! (If you can't view the video, there is a story here.)

Open Wide...

Privilege Gives Us Bad Instincts, By Design

[Content Note: Privilege; auditing.]

Here is something that has never happened to me: I've said or written something about some piece of misogyny, either directed at me or elsewhere, had a man tell me, "I don't see it," been 'splained at by that man about how I'm wrong, and then changed my mind because I am so wowed by his insight.

That has never happened. I don't believe it ever will.

And yet, on a nearly daily basis, I am confronted by men who are keen to tell me that they don't view something as misogyny, that there is some other explanation, that I am mistaken. They talk to me like I am very stupid, and very naive, and they will Occam's Big Paisley Tie at me with reason after absurd reason why something isn't misogyny. Why I am wrong.

Many times, these men purport to be my ally.

And the men who purport to be my ally will readily concede they have male privilege, even as they fail utterly to understand or examine how that privilege acts on them, and how much work it really takes to work through it; how much vigilance not wielding it demands.

We cannot merely be aware of having privilege; we have to understand how it works, and what it does to our humanity.

Resocializing ourselves out of the toxic oppressions with which we were indoctrinated is work. It doesn't happen by magic, and it sure doesn't happen merely by declaring ourselves aware of our privilege.

Human beings are designed to be sponges, and we sponges are socialized every day of our entire lives by a bombardment of messaging exhorting us to privilege some people and treat others as less than. It is absurd to imagine that we can overcome this aggressive socialization without serious effort.

A socialization that tells people of privilege: You are superior. You are worth more than the people who lack your privilege. You are a better person.

It's not true. In every way, privilege erodes our ability to connect to other people. It subverts our empathy, and diminishes our humanity.

Privilege gives us bad instincts, by design.

It tells us lies. So many lies.

And the most harmful lie it tells us is that we are objective, by virtue of our privilege.

What I mean is: It assures us that our perception of the world is right. That we understand how the world works, and why things happen, better than marginalized people, who naturally benefit from our insightful explanations. Ahem.

Every time you hear a white person explain at a black woman that some other white person didn't touch her hair because of racist entitlement, but because of innocent curiosity; every time you hear a straight person explain at a gay person that some other straight person didn't mean gay like that, heavens no; every time you hear a man defend another man to a woman by proclaiming he's no misogynist, for god's sake, he loves women! (which means: "he loves fucking women"); every time you hear a cis person tell a trans* person that they weren't overlooked for a promotion for the third time in a row because of transphobia, they couldnt' have been, it must've been something else, there's got to be some other explanation...

Every time you hear these tortured explanations, that's privilege. Privilege telling us that we have the right—and the responsibility!—to audit marginalized people's reports of harm and tell them that they're wrong.

Privilege tells us the lie that being oppressed by prejudice makes a person an unreliable witness to hir own life, but benefiting from prejudice makes a person an objective observer of that life.

That's a nifty little trick, isn't it? Being victimized compromises you. Only people in a position to victimize can be trusted to define what constitutes harm.

As if people in a position to victimize don't have a vested interest in explaining away harm.

When I talk publicly about my lived experiences as a fat woman—the harassment, the body shaming, the food policing, the armchair diagnosing, the hostility of healthcare providers, the jokes, the sneers, the looks, the shouts from passing cars—there are always thin people who will jump in to tell me that this or that didn't happen because I am fat, but because…insert here any other rationale, no matter how ludicrous.

And a thin person's voice, auditing my lived experience, telling me that my oppression is not what I think it is, is valued more highly than my own. A lifetime of living in a fat body, experiencing the world as a fat person, learning—by necessity—the patterns and practices of systemic fat hatred, still does not qualify me to be an expert on my own life.

That's how privilege works. That is the lie that it tells—I can't know my own life as well as any thin person who decides they want to comment on it.

This happens to people from all marginalized classes. Every woman can probably think of countless examples of having reported some instance of sexism, only to have a man try to explain it away. Every person of color can think of examples of white people trying to explain racism away. Every person with a disability can think of examples of able-bodied people (or people with a different disability) trying to explain disablism away as some other reason one just didn't see.

Or perhaps by simply saying: "I don't see it."

"I don't see it" is a favorite rhetorical flourish of privileged people, relying on the objectivity and authority that privilege assures us we have. On the right we believe we have to haughtily sniff at another human being who's been harmed by prejudice, "I don't see it." With an implied, "Then it can't be so."

And this is only one manner in which privileged people act as arbiters on the lives and choices of marginalized people. We deny marginalized people the right of authority on even their own lives in any number of even crueler ways.

Like accusing someone of being too sensitive, instead of examining how privilege erodes our capacity to be sensitive enough.

Privilege tells us the lie that we know other people's lives better than they know their own, that they couldn't possibly understand their own lives without the benefit of our superior objectivity. Privilege assures us that our role is to audit; rather than to empathize.

Privilege tells us the lie that everyone else is just like us, or should be. That universalizing our own experiences—and preferences and needs and choices—is not only okay, but the "Golden Rule." That kindness is projecting one's own perspective onto everyone else, rather than listening to individual people about how they would like to be treated, and then treating them that way.

Privilege tells us the lie that we shouldn't challenge this sort of conventional wisdom—or challenge anything, really, instead endeavoring to maintain the status quo. That we should not bother to challenge the way things are, because this is the natural order of things and thus the way they will ever be. That we should not expect more—of the world, of one another, of ourselves. That expecting more is an unreasonable expectation.

Privilege lulls us into easy complacency, and entrains us to behave in ways that burn bridges, rather than build them.

A crucial part of understanding how privilege works is understanding that privileged voices are louder, carry further, can drown out other voices. The presence of a privileged person can change the dynamic in a room, or an online space, otherwise filled with people who don't share that privilege.

We need to just be okay with the radical notion, contrary to everything that privilege teaches us, that sometimes we have nothing to add.

We have to just get okay with the radical idea, contrary to everything that privilege teaches us, that sometimes the only thing we have of value to offer to marginalized people is LISTENING, VALIDATING, and BELIEVING.

Sometimes, there just isn't anything we can do except mitigate harm. Which is not a small thing.

Sometimes, the only thing we can offer is just not behaving like every other white person, or man, or cis person, or any other person of privilege, who has failed to LISTEN, VALIDATE, and BELIEVE.

Sometimes, the best thing you can do is just shut the fuck up.

Privilege gives us bad instincts. One of those instincts is to talk and talk and talk. To explain at marginalized people about their own lives. To "educate" them.

That is not helpful. That is harmful. Just shut the fuck up.

I promise you: If you stop acting like you have nothing to learn from marginalized people, you will start "seeing it."

Open Wide...

Welp

[Content Note: Threats to the President's safety.]

Following reports of several severe security lapses, Julia Pierson, Director of the US Secret Service, has resigned.

Pierson stepped down just 18 months after President Barack Obama selected her to take over a law enforcement agency that already had been tarnished by misconduct by agents.

"I think it's in the best interest of the Secret Service and the American public if I step down," Pierson said in an interview with Bloomberg News after her resignation was announced by the Department of Homeland Security. "Congress has lost confidence in my ability to run the agency. The media has made it clear that this is what they expected."
"Tarnished by misconduct of agents" is a polite way of putting it. Pierson came aboard amid a series of scandals, that included racism, sexism, allegations of sexual harassment, and dereliction of duty.

Pierson was the first woman to serve as director of the Secret Service, and she was essentially set up to fail: Brought in to be a female face for an agency getting a notorious reputation for being a boys-will-be-boys' club, but not given the resources to actually implement meaningful changes.
Reasonable people can disagree about whether, ultimately, she deserved to lose her job or whether anyone in charge during such an incident would have to resign. But it's probably not pure chance that Pierson, who held that position for just a year-and-a-half, was a woman. Time and again, women are put in charge only when there's a mess, and if they can't engineer a quick cleanup, they're shoved out the door. The academics Michelle Ryan and Alex Haslam even coined a term for this phenomenon: They call it getting pushed over the glass cliff.

Pierson was, in fact, explicitly brought in to clean up a mess. When President Obama nominated her last year, it was on the heels of news that Secret Service employees hired prostitutes in Cartagena, Colombia ahead of the president's arrival. Pierson was meant to be a breath of fresh feminine air to clear out the macho cobwebs still dogging the agency...

That wasn't the only thing hobbling the agency before Pierson's arrival, though. It has been perpetually underfunded and understaffed. In his book on the secret service, Ronald Kessler describes how agents are stretched so thin that the agency grapples with high turnover. ...This is the first year since 2010 that the agency isn't operating with a budget below what it requested [from Congress]. And since that year, personnel levels have seen a severe decline.

...As with Pierson, women are often put in these positions because rough patches make people think they need to shake things up and try something new – like putting a woman in charge. When it's smooth sailing, on the other hand, men get to maintain control of the steering wheel. Women are also thought to have qualities associated with cleaning up messes.
Women are the cleaning crew. And they fail to magically clean up a mess while not being given any cleaning products, well, that just goes to show you how women aren't up to the task.

This sort of misogyny has repercussions bigger than individual insult, of course: Pierson will take the fall, the grave breaches chalked up to her incompetency (her womanhood), and the real, profound, comprehensive reasons for these failures will go unaddressed.

Or, perhaps, Congress will actually listen to her male successor, when he says he needs better resources to make the necessary changes.

And then he will get plaudits for his industrious leadership and refreshing competency, all for the "skill" of having a voice to which people were willing to listen.

Open Wide...

Of Course

[Content Note: Police brutality; racism.]

Because justice in Ferguson for the killing of Michael Brown is apparently as elusive (and mythical) as Bigfoot, the St. Louis County prosecutor's office is now investigating alleged misconduct among members of the grand jury hearing the case against Officer Darren Wilson.

Shaun King, who has also documented the lies of the Ferguson police force regarding the scene of the killing, tweeted a screen cap of a tweet by someone named Susan M Nichols, who has previously tweeted support for Wilson, which reads: "I know someone sitting on the grand jury of this case. There isn't enough at this point to warrant an arrest. #Ferguson"

Members of the grand jury are not allowed to discuss the case while the grand jury is convened. If the confidentiality has been broken, "the prosecutor's office may have to start over with a newly empaneled group."

The attorney for Brown's family, Ben Crump, said the potential breach must be fully investigated.

"If this allegation is true and there is a member of the grand jury who is discussing the case with a Darren Wilson supporters the appropriate thing for the prosecutor to do is impanel a new grand jury," Crump said in an interview Wednesday night. "If this person is discussing the case outside of the grand jury it is wholly inappropriate. It's an issue of fairness for Michael Brown's family."

Reached on Wednesday evening, King told The Post that the potential link was further evidence that the current legal proceedings may be flawed.

"At a time where so many people in Ferguson already don't believe that Prosecutor Bob McCulloch will take this case seriously, this potential leak is a disaster," King said. "If it's found to be true and the Grand Jury has to be dismantled, McCulloch should be taken off of the case immediately and replaced with a special prosecutor."
What an absolute clusterfuck. I feel so sad and angry for Michael Brown's family, and everyone in that community who feels like there may never be anything that looks even a little bit like justice.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of multicolored sea urchins on the ocean floor

Hosted by urchins.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Suggested by Shaker plot_thickens: "What's your best serendipitous story?"

Open Wide...

The Wednesday Blogaround

This blogaround brought to you by colored markers.

Recommended Reading:

Trudy: [Content Note: Validity Prism; kyriarchy] I Am Tired of "Status"

Anne: [CN: Misogyny; harassment] No, I Don't Want to Learn How to Love Criticism, Thanks

Ragen: [CN: Fat hatred; eliminationism] Living a Normal Life

Danielle: [CN: Misogynoir; looksism] Viola Davis Is Classically Beautiful Although It's Not Her Job to Be

Rosie: [CN: Misogyny] When Bad Allies Get "Good Guy" Awards

BYP: [CN: Racism] Boston Herald Cartoon Mocks Obama Intruder Situation; Has Intruder Asking President about Watermelon

Jim: [CN: Homophobia; Christian Supremacy] Mexican Bishop Says Marriage Equality Will Lead to Man-Dog Weddings

blackskeptics: Brave New Face of Humanism: A Gathering of Atheists, Freethinkers, & Humanists of Color

Leave your links and recommendations in comments. Self-promotion welcome and encouraged!

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

[Content Note: Guns; racism. Disablist language in headline at link.]

"Surely these open carry people, however well intentioned, should realize that nice white men and women openly carrying firearms on the street aren't being gunned down on sight by police officers. The worst thing that happens to them is they are forced to show their ID. It's unarmed black men (and unarmed mentally ill people of all races) who are being gunned down on sight by police officers. ...The problem isn't that people don't have enough guns. The problem is that police are too often using the guns they have. That won't be solved by a bunch of average suburban white people wandering around public spaces with their rifles slung over their backs. Those aren't the people most likely to be shot by police—whether they're armed or not. They're missing the point entirely."—Digby, in a terrific piece on gun advocates' taking up John Crawford's case as a cause, for utterly the wrong reasons.

Open Wide...

Something That Looks a Little Like Justice

[Content Note: Guns; racism; violence.]

Michael Dunn, the 47-year-old white man who shot and killed 17-year-old unarmed black teen Jordan Davis after Dunn asked the car full of teens in which Davis was a passenger to turn down their music in a public parking lot and they refused, has been found guilty of first-degree murder, following a hung jury on the charge in February.

GOOD. Good.

Open Wide...

It Continues to Be a Real Mystery Why Republicans Aren't Connecting with a Majority of Female Voters

[Content Note: Misogyny; heterocentrism.]

A week after I wrote about this piece of shit ad in which it's implied women pick candidates like boyfriends, now I'm obliged to write about this piece of shit ad in which women choose candidates like wedding dresses: "The College Republican National Committee launched on Wednesday a nearly $1 million digital ad campaign across 16 states, aiming to draw young voters to the GOP with what the group's chief calls 'culturally relevant' ad campaigns. The first ad, launched Wednesday morning in Florida, is modeled after TLC's Say Yes to the Dress, where brides-to-be look for wedding dresses."

A young thin blonde white woman appears in a series of wedding dresses as she spins, a la the credits to Say Yes to the Dress, followed by text onscreen reading: "Say Yes to the Candidate."

The bride appears in a talking head segment, again in the style of Say Yes to the Dress. She is identified as: "Brittany, Undecided Voter." She says: "Budget is a big deal for me now that I just graduated from college." Cut to video of her looking through dresses on a rack, then admiring herself in a mirror after she's tried on one. "The Rick Scott is perfect!" she tells a thin middle-aged white woman, who is her dress consultant.

"The Rick Scott" (Rick Scott is the Republican Governor of Florida) is a simple, elegant gown. As the bride models the dress for her friends and mother, she says in voiceover, "Rick Scott is becoming a trusted brand. He has new ideas that don't break your budget."

As her mother, a red-haired middle-aged woman in a black and white polka-dot dress, makes a revolted face, a male voiceover says: "But Mom has other ideas." Cut to Mom in a talking head segment. "Gloria, Bride's Mother." She says, "I like the Charlie Crist."

Cut to the bride with her dress consultant, trying on a fussier gown that does not flatter her shape as well. She looks horrified. (Charlie Crist is the former Republican Governor of Florida and current Democratic candidate for Governor of Florida.) In voiceover, Mom says, "It's expensive and a little outdated, but I know best!"

As the bride models the dress for her friends (who hate it) and Mom (who loves it), the dress consultant says: "And don't forget—the Charlie Crist comes with additional costs. There's over two billion dollars in taxes, three-point-six billion dollars in debt, and fifteen percent tuition increases." Mom cheers.

The bride is now buried in an oversized veil and yards of fabric. "But I'll be paying this off for the rest of my life!" the bride exclaims, looking miserable.

Her friend, a young black woman ("Tiffani, Maid of Honor"), in a talking head segment, says: "We could not let her walk out of the voting booth like that!"

"Mom," says the bride, "this is my decision! And I see a better future with Rick Scott." Triumphant music as she once again models the Rick Scott gown.

"Sometimes it's hard to let go of old styles," says the male voiceover, as Mom looks disappointed. "But it all worked out in the end, because Brittany said yes to Rick Scott!" Champagne and cheers.
Wait—is she marrying Rick Scott, or voting for him? If she's just voting for him, why does she have a maid of honor? This metaphor is bullshit.

You know what else is bullshit? That Republicans evidently cannot think of a way to appeal to female voters without casting us as relationship-seeking girls.

(Which, you know, maybe wouldn't be so tempting if the Republican Party ran more female candidates. As an aside.)

Honestly, the only thing more insulting than the implication I would choose a candidate based on the same criteria I use to choose an intimate partner is the belief that I could conceivably be persuaded to choose a candidate based on an ad this fucking stupid.

Yes, it's a real mystery why young women aren't flocking to the Republican Party en masse, when the best strategies they've devised to appeal to young women are: 1. Take away their reproductive rights; 2. Insult them!

Keep up the fine work, dipshits.

[Note: There are versions for Arkansas, Colorado, Illinois, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, too.]

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Zelda the Black and Tan Mutt lying beside me on the couch on her back, with her legs in the air and her head hanging off the side of the couch
Zelly, subtly hinting she would like some belly rubs, please. LOL.

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...