Assvertising

[Content Note: Fat hatred.]

This Australian advertisement for Weight Watchers (WW) is one of the grossest—and unintentionally revealing—commentaries on the weight loss industry that I have ever seen (which is really saying something):

Text onscreen: "Dedicated to everyone who refused to give up trying." followed by the WW logo.

Over tinkly music, there is video of what is meant to be a montage of a thin white brunette woman's life (throughout, the aging representations of this woman are thin, white, and brunette): A baby being born; a toddler swimming in a pool; a young girl on a school bus; a teenage girl kissing a white boy; a young woman running into the water on a beach with a white young man; a woman smashing a plate during a fight with a man; a woman on a date with a man; a woman breastfeeding a child; a middle-aged woman negotiating at work; a middle-aged woman standing in her kitchen looking tired; an older woman seeing a doctor with her older white husband.

Over these clips is a female voiceover saying: "You were incredible from minute one. You refused to give up trying. You survived school. You didn't run from your first kiss. You sought out adventure. You fell out of love; bravely back into it. You said yes to always being there. You stood up for what you believed in. You conquered the impossible daily. You won unwinnable battles."

The video then shows a series of individual people: A young thin white woman; a middle-aged thin black man; a young thin white woman; a thin middle-aged white woman;

Over these clips, the female voiceover says: "These are your stories. Never forget how incredible you are."

Text onscreen: "Awaken YOUR incredible. Weight Watchers."
This advertisement is straight-up hateful garbage.

1. WW has a virtually nonexistent success rate for long-term weight loss. Which means that they make lots and lots of money off of people who "refuse to give up trying," hoping that WW's promised "lifestyle change" (i.e. permanent diet) will work for them this time. WW is deeply invested in promoting the idea that if you fail to lose weight on their program, it's down to your lack of effort, not down to their program being garbage that doesn't work for most people on a long-term basis. They are exploiting fat hating narratives that attribute fatness to laziness, and doing it under the auspices of telling fat people we're "incredible."

2. Every person in this video is thin. There isn't a fat person to be seen. This is because images of thin people are supposed to be aspirational for fat people, and because the weight loss industry is explicitly eliminationist: The stated objective is to get rid of fat people. WW on the one hand tells fat people that they're "incredible," but also erases us from the world. The message is, of course, that fat people are really only incredible once we've lost weight—or at least commit ourselves to trying.

3. Pervasive, intense, aggressive fat hatred stops lots of fat people from being able to survive school, or seeking out romantic relationships, or seeking out adventure. It's particularly cruel to show images of thin people doing these things, that many fat people can't or don't do, because of the hatred directed at us for our bodies, with a voiceover suggesting "you're incredible because you've done these things."

4. The takeaway, naturally, is that: "If you haven't done these things, it's because you're fat. And if you're thin, you'll be able to do all of them!" The constant misattribution of restricted lives to "being fat" instead of "being targeted by incessant fat hatred" is bullshit. And WW knows it's bullshit. But they don't make money if fat people don't feel like we don't deserve to live until we are thin.

5. Fuck you, Weight Watchers. I'm fat and incredible. Precisely because I don't consider those mutually exclusive conditions.

[H/T to Marilyn Wann.]

Open Wide...

Today in Great Ideas

[Content Note: War on agency; misogyny; choice policing.]

This guy sounds like a genius:

An Alaska lawmaker on a mission to eradicate fetal alcohol syndrome is defending his plan to provide state-funded pregnancy tests in bars in case birth control fails "chronic drinkers."

State Sen. Pete Kelly (R) said Monday before the Alaska Senate that birth control may not protect Alaskan women who drink regularly from getting pregnant.

"If you have people who are binge drinking or chronic drinkers, we're hesitant to say 'use birth control as your protection against fetal alcohol syndrome,' because again, as I say, binge drinking is a problem," he said. "If you think you can take birth control and then binge drink and hope not to produce a fetal alcohol syndrome baby, you may be very wrong. Sometimes these things don't work. Sometimes people forget. Sometimes they administer birth control improperly, and you might produce a fetal alcohol syndrome baby."

State Sen. Berta Gardner (D) then asked to correct the record to reflect that birth control is used as a protection against pregnancy, not fetal alcohol syndrome.
High-give, Sen. Gardner!

I mean, everything about this idea is totally terrific. (And, in case I'm not laying it on thick enough, that was sarcasm.) But I think the thing I love the most about it is a (small-government!) senator who is willing to spend taxpayer dollars on forced pregnancy tests, but is not willing to spend taxpayer dollars on free contraceptives or reproductive healthcare. Neat!

Open Wide...

And Next Month, and Next Month, and the Next...

The subject line of an email I just received, from some organization trying to convince me they give a fuck about women: "What Are You Doing to Celebrate Women's History Month?"

The same thing I do every month: Care about women's issues like care is a verb that compels action.

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Dudley the Greyhound lying on the loveseat with his legs in the air and his head on the arm of the couch

This goofy dog. ♥

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

The Wednesday Blogaround

This blogaround brought to you by wax.

Recommended Reading:

Libby Anne: [Content Note: Rape culture] A Complete Misunderstanding of the Term "Rape Culture"

Danielle: [CN: Misogynoir; violence] I'm Not an Angry Black Woman But Should I Be?

Adele: [CN: War on agency] In Unprecedented Assault, Koch Brothers Aim for Anti-Choice Senate in 2014

Kai: [CN: Class warfare] What We've Learned from Obamacare

Latoya: [CN: Misogynoir; class warfare] Study Shows That Black Women Have More Financial Burdens Than White Women

Resistance: [CN: Racism; White Supremacy] Thoroughly Racist Thoroughly Modern Millie

Amanda: [CN: Racism; assault] Man Sues Railroad after Co-Worker Cuts His Dreadlocks

Michelle: Why I'm Doing a Dietetic Internship

Leave your links and recommendations in comments...

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime



k.d. lang: "Hallelujah"

Open Wide...

In the News

Here is some stuff in the news today...

[Content Note: War on agency; Christian Supremacy] Over at ProPublica, Nina Martin has a terrific round-up of pieces on the Hobby Lobby case before the Supreme Court.

[CN: Disaster; death] More bodies have been recovered from the aftermath of the Washington landslide. Absolutely devastating. There was some good news, though, as an infant and a four-year-old boy were rescued alive. To give some idea of the conditions with which rescuers are contending: "The boy was so firmly embedded in the slide that crews literally had to pull him out of his pants."

And one very lucky family found their dog alive. Yay! [Note: Video may begin to play automatically at link.]

If you have been trying to enroll in health plans through the federal insurance marketplace, but aren't able to finalize enrollment by the March 31 deadline: "Federal officials confirmed Tuesday evening that all consumers who have begun to apply for coverage on HealthCare.gov, but who do not finish by Monday, will have until about mid-April to ask for an extension."

[CN: Transphobia; police malfeasance] The ACLU has filed an amicus brief "as part of our ongoing efforts to end the abuse that transgender people experience in the custody of police departments and corrections agencies. The Court should follow clear law that officials cannot meet their constitutional obligations by placing vulnerable individuals in an obvious path to harm."

Good grief: "Two CNN producers were arrested Tuesday while allegedly trying to break into the World Trade Center site to report on recent security breaches."

[CN: Gender policing] A Christian school in Virginia has refused to enroll a little girl because she doesn't conform to a traditional presentation of femininity. Just like Jesus would do!

Swell: "A BP refinery in Whiting, Indiana leaked an unknown amount of oil into Lake Michigan Monday afternoon, an incident that occurred less than two weeks after the U.S. lifted BP’s ban on seeking new oil leases in the Gulf of Mexico. BP says the spill, which has since been stopped and contained, was caused by a 'disruption in the refining process' at its Whiting refinery in northwest Indiana." Oh, okay then. "Lake Michigan acts as the drinking water source for 7 million people in the Chigago area alone, but EPA officials said on the call that the drinking water wouldn't be affected by the spill." For some reason, I don't feel reassured.

A shelter in West Virginia celebrated its six-month anniversary of not euthanizing any animals for space considerations by tearing down its incinerator. Love.

Open Wide...

This Is Not a Solution; This Is the Problem.

[Content Note: Misogynoir; class warfare; systemic abuse.]

The Myth of Bootstraps goes something like this: I never got any help from anyone. I achieved my American Dream all on my own, through hard work. I got an education, I saved my money, I worked hard, I took risks, and I never complained or blamed anyone else when I failed, and every time I fell, I picked myself up by my bootstraps and just worked even harder. No one helped me.

This is almost always a lie.

There are vanishingly few people who have never had help from anyone—who never had family members who helped them, or friends, or colleagues, or teachers.

Who never benefited from government programs that made sure they had electricity, or mail, or passable roads, or clean drinking water, or food, or shelter, or healthcare, or a loan.

Who never had any kind of privilege from which they benefited, even if they didn't actively try to trade on it.

Who never had an opportunity they saw as luck which was really someone, somewhere, making a decision that benefited them.

Who never had friends to help them move, so they didn't have to pay for movers. Who never inherited a couch, so they didn't have to pay for a couch. Who never got hand-me-down clothes from a cousin, so their parents could afford piano lessons. Who never had shoes that fit and weren't leaky, when the kid down the street didn't.

Most, maybe all, of the people who say they never got any help from anyone are taking a lot of help for granted.

They imagine that everyone has the same basic foundations that they had—and, if you point out to them that these kids over here live in an area rife with environmental pollutants that have been shown to affect growth or brain function or breathing capacity, they will simply sniff with indifference and declare that those things don't matter. That government regulations which protect some living spaces and abandon others to poisons isn't help.

The government giving you money to eat is a hand-out. The government giving you regulations that protect the air you breathe is, at best, nothing of value—and, at worst, a job-killing regulation that impedes the success of people who want to get rich dumping toxins into the ground where people getting hand-outs live.

When people really don't have any help from anyone, it doesn't look like gold-plated car elevators. It looks like this: Arizona Mother Arrested after Leaving Kids in Car During Job Interview.

Shanesha Taylor is a homeless, single mother of 2 children, who was arrested for child abuse this week. Taylor left her children, ages 6 and 2 years old, in her Dodge Durango while she attended a job interview in Scottsdale, Arizona.

A passerby found the children in the car, with the engine turned off and the windows cracked open. Once Taylor returned to the car, 45 minutes later, she informed the police officer that she did not have a babysitter for her children.

"She was upset. This is a sad situation all around. She said she was homeless. She needed the job. Obviously not getting the job. So it's just a sad situation," said Scottsdale Police Sergeant Mark Clark.

She was arrested and booked into jail for child abuse.

Her children are now in CPS custody.
At the link, Taylor is seen in her mugshot, tears streaming down her cheeks.

The bootstrappers will argue that she should have found someone to watch her kids. Everyone has someone they can ask to watch their kids. No. Not everyone does. That's what really having no help from anyone looks like.

People who don't have family they can ask usually have neighbors, but Taylor is homeless. Or co-workers, but Taylor is jobless. Or someone they can pay, but Taylor has no money. With whom could she leave her children? There is no free daycare offered by the government—the same government that is trying to force women to have as many children as possible.

She and her children need food and shelter. She needs a job to provide food and shelter. She needs to go on an interview to get a job to provide food and shelter. She needs to leave her children somewhere while she goes on an interview to get a job to provide food and shelter.

She doesn't have anywhere to leave them. She leaves them in the car, because it is her only option. And she is arrested and her children removed from her care.

Nothing makes sense about indefinitely separating Taylor from her children, as punishment from her leaving them for 45 minutes. But criminalization is the only solution we have. We offer jail, instead of help.

Last fall, I read this story in the local paper: "Poor school attendance leads to charges against parent." That story, too, features a mugshot of a black mother, looking grieved. Because of her son's truancy—he had 19 unexcused absences and was tardy 30 times during the school year—Moina Lucious was arrested, charged with a felony count of neglect, and faced six month to three years in prison.

There were no details in the story about what may have been happening in this family's life that was contributing to the truancy. (I will also note that excused absences cost money; if your kid is sick, and you can't afford to take hir to the doctor, your kid might stay sick for longer, and you also don't have a doctor's note to provide to the school.) Naturally, we're meant to assume that Lucious is just a Terrible Mother, but I can imagine about 2,000 reasons why this could have been happening when support from her community might have solved the problem.

In a way that sending her to prison never will.

What if all the taxpayer money that's used arresting, processing, probably public defending, possibly trying, and maybe jailing women like Taylor and Lucious were instead used toward social programs that would have supported them in the first place?

The people who claim to never have had any help from anyone are the same people who tend to criticize "government hand-outs" and talk about the social safety net like it's a giant waste of taxpayer money—a "wealth redistribution program" to steal rich folks' money and give it to the poor.

(They're also the most likely to say shit like, "Don't have kids if you can't take care of them," while they simultaneously support policy that seeks to deny women control over our reproduction.)

But people need help. Everyone needs help. And not everyone is fortunate enough to have the kind of help that is so reliable it's possible to dismiss it out of hand as not even having been help at all.

This is what really having no help looks like. We don't actually reward not having help in this country; we criminalize it.

And that's not a solution. It's the problem.

Open Wide...

Secret Service Agents Behaving Badly. Again.

Secret Service agents on Obama detail sent home from Netherlands after night of drinking:

Three Secret Service agents responsible for protecting President Obama in Amsterdam this week were sent home and put on administrative leave Sunday after going out for a night of drinking, according to three people familiar with the incident. One of the agents was found drunk and passed out in a hotel hallway, the people said.

The hotel staff alerted the U.S. Embassy in the Netherlands after finding the unconscious agent Sunday morning, a day before Obama arrived in the country, according to two of the people. The embassy then alerted Secret Service managers on the presidential trip, which included the agency's director, Julia Pierson.

Secret Service spokesman Ed Donovan confirmed Tuesday evening that the agency "did send three employees home for disciplinary reasons" and that they were put on administrative leave pending an investigation. Donovan declined to comment further.
This is at least the fourth incident of Secret Service agents engaging in misconduct in the last few years. I don't know if we just didn't used to hear about these issues, or if the Secret Service has declined in the last few years. Either way, get it together, Secret Service.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of a baby orangutan cuddling with a tiger cub

Hosted by a baby orangutan and a tiger cub.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Suggested by Shaker masculine_lady: "What unexpected or atypical flavor/food combinations do you like?"

Open Wide...

Welp

[Content Note: War on agency.]

"Justice Kennedy Thinks Hobby Lobby Is an Abortion Case—That's Bad News for Birth Control." It's bad news for people who use birth control, and a lot of other people, too.

Clement pounced on the opening Kennedy gave him the second he took the podium for his rebuttal argument. The government's position, he claimed, goes straight to abortion and "that cannot be what Congress meant when it passed RFRA." Kagan's face grew even more worried.

As I left the Supreme Court building, I ran into one of the nation's leading advocates for reproductive justice. We smiled at each other, and then I said "Kennedy thinks this is an abortion case. The government is going to lose."

"That's right," she said, shaking her head. "That's right."
I used to get so stressed waiting for certain SCOTUS decisions; now I just sit back and wait to write about the inevitable garbage rulings.

Open Wide...

An Observation

I blame Al Gore, inventor of the internetz, for personally bringing to an end one of my favorite film tropes: The searching through microfiche montage.

RIP microfiche montage.

(Also? I can't believe there's not a microfiche supercut on YouTube. What a sad day.)

Open Wide...

This Is So Cool

image of the FoldScope, a flat microscope made out of paper

Via Shaker TheDeviantE, here is an amazing story about Stanford Professor Manu Prakash and his students developing a portable, super-cheap paper microscope called the FoldScope, which could radically change the availability of diagnostic tools around the world.
Manu Prakash, a professor at Stanford University and his students have developed a microscope out of a flat sheet of paper, a watch battery, LED, and optical units that when folded together...creates a functional instrument with the resolution of 800 nanometers – basically magnifying an object up to 2,000 times.

[The FoldScope] is extremely inexpensive to manufacture, costing between fifty-cents and a dollar per instrument. And because the microscope is assembled primarily from paper and optical components the size of a grain of sand, it is virtually indestructible.

Foldscope also differs from the microscopes typically found in science labs because it's not only portable, but it also has the ability to project an image on any surface, allowing a larger group of people the ability to look at an image simultaneously.

Prakash is hoping that because the Foldscope is so cheap to manufacture and easy to assemble that everyone will have access to the world of microscopy and one day every kid will have a Foldscope in their backpacks or tucked away in their pocket.
Extraordinary. How exciting!

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Olivia the White Farm Cat sitting on the end of the chaise, looking extremely soft and cuddly

Fuzzy wee dumpling. ♥

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

Meanwhile...

[Content Note: Racism; racist imagery.]

While former Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney says President Obama should have been able to "see the future" regarding Russia, former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld says that a "trained ape" could have done a better job in diplomatic relations with Afghanistan.

"We have status of forces agreements probably with 100, 125 countries in the world," Rumsfeld said Monday night on On the Record with Greta van Susteren on Fox News. "This administration, the White House and the State Department, have failed to get a status of forces agreement. A trained ape could get a status of forces agreement. It does not take a genius."
"Trained ape" is one of Rumsfeld's favorite turns of phrase, but his casual use of the term does not mitigate the racist connotations of using it in the specific context of criticizing the foreign policy of our black president.

Who was just depicted, along with the First Lady, as an ape in a Belgian newspaper last week.

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

"The president's naïveté with regards to Russia, and his faulty judgement about Russia's intentions and objectives has led to a number of foreign policy challenges that we face. ...I think effective leaders typically are able to see the future to a certain degree, and are able to take actions to shape it in some way. And that's, of course, what this president has failed to do. And as secretary of state, Hillary Clinton as well."Mitt Romney, on Face the Nation over the weekend.

Romney asserts that he's the kind of effective leader who can "see the future," which I have to say is not evidenced by the fact that he ran for and lost the presidency. Twice.

Frankly, given that John Kerry, not Hillary Clinton, is the current Secretary of State, I'm not convinced that Mitt Romney can see the present, either.

image of Mitt Romney giving the thumbs-up
"Good job, me!"

Open Wide...

In Unsurprising News...

[Content Note: Fat hatred; food policing.]

I have written a lot about former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg's (thwarted) attempts to "curb obesity" with soda bans, as well as various proposals to tax certain foods and/or drinks to "curb obesity" or subsidize fat people's healthcare (based on the fallacy that fat people's healthcare is "a drain on the system").

These proposals are, for multiple reasons, garbage. They've always been garbage, they always will be garbage, and a study out of the University of Wisconsin-Madison's La Follette School of Public Affairs has found them to be garbage.

Partly, as addressed in the linked article, that's because the disproportionate focus on soda ignores other high-sugar beverages, which are used as replacements. And partly, as also addressed in the article, that's because soda isn't the end-all be-all to Why People Are Fat.

But, as always, it's a deeply complex issue. As long as we live in a country with intense, persistent, and pervasive food insecurity, and soda is one of the cheapest ways to get 100+ calories, people are going to be drinking soda. And that goes for a lot of the other "bad foods" (there are no bad foods when you're starving) that Deeply Concerned Folks demonize, too.

Would that everyone who spends time worrying about the existence of fat people instead invested that energy into making sure everyone had consistent access to the best foods for their bodies.

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime



Rufus Wainwright: "Hallelujah"

Open Wide...

In the News

Here is some stuff in the news today...

The Obama administration is "preparing to unveil a legislative proposal for a far-reaching overhaul of the National Security Agency's once-secret bulk phone records program in a way that—if approved by Congress—would end the aspect that has most alarmed privacy advocates since its existence was leaked last year, according to senior administration officials. Under the proposal, they said, the NSA would end its systematic collection of data about Americans' calling habits. The bulk records would stay in the hands of phone companies, which would not be required to retain the data for any longer than they normally would. And the NSA could obtain specific records only with permission from a judge, using a new kind of court order." A new kind of court order that will probably be garbage like most of the other new kinds of courts orders that have been proposed regarding surveillance over the last decade.

[Content Note: Homophobia] The ACLU of Indiana has filed a lawsuit in federal court to challenge Indiana's ban on same-sex marriage, on the basis that the law violates the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses of the US Constitution. Woot! You can read the press release, which includes information on the plaintiffs, here (pdf), and, if you live in Indiana, the ACLU is soliciting stories about what the freedom to marry means to you, in preparation for the challenge. (Your story will not be used without your permission.)

Meanwhile, in Wisconsin, US District Judge Barbara Crabb "denied a motion filed March 14 by state lawyers to stay a court challenge to Wisconsin's anti-gay marriage amendment."

[CN: Guns; violence] Last night, a civilian breached security and boarded the US Navy destroyer USS Mahan at Virginia's Naval Station Norfolk, where "he fatally shot a sailor on the ship before security personnel shot and killed him, a US defense official said Tuesday. ...Once on board, the civilian grabbed the service pistol of a petty officer who was standing guard, the official said. Two other security sailors arrived, and the civilian fatally shot one of them, according to the official." We've become so inured to shootings that I've barely heard or read anything about this story. Just another day in the US of A.

[CN: Disaster; death] Six more people have been found dead in the wreckage of the landslide in Washington, bringing the total number of deaths to 14 so far. More than a hundred people are still missing as searchers contend with "dangerous quicksand-like conditions."

[CN: War on agency] The Kansas state legislature is considering legislation that "would mandate reporting for miscarriages at any stage in pregnancy, the first step along the path to criminalizing pregnant women's bodies. Under an amendment attached to HB 2613—which was originally intended to update the state's procedure for issuing birth certificates for stillborn babies—doctors would be required to report all of their patients' miscarriages to the state health department." There's so much wrong with this I don't even know where to begin.

[CN: Guns; violence; abuse] The prosecution has rested in trial of Oscar Pistorius for the murder of Reeva Steenkamp. After a two-day recess, the defense will begin to present its case, at which point Pistorius will likely take the stand. I don't know how this is going to play out, but I hope the judge isn't persuaded with whatever crocodile tears he's fixing to spill during his testimony, after hearing all the evidence about his obsession with guns and his obsession with controlling Steenkamp.

ProPublica finds that 10% of researchers "have multiple ties" to the nine pharmaceutical companies analyzed as part of ProPublica's researching, raising questions "about doctors' impartiality." Our for-profit healthcare system continues to be working GREAT.

And finally: Here is just another amazing story about a rescued dog saving its adoptive family—and, in this case, possibly several other families: Erin Cramer's recently rescued greyhound, Clobber, alerted Cramer to a gas leak from the water heater. "Her water heater had sprung a leak and begun filling the room with natural gas. Later, Cramer also learned the heater was sparking. '(The plumber) said it probably would have ignited the gas fumes and taken out not only this house but several around me,' Cramer said. 'If it wasn’t for him coming into our lives, we probably wouldn't be here right now.'" All the blubs forever and ever. Good dog.

Open Wide...