An Annotated Index of Ross Geller (107-112)

[Content Note: Misogyny, Patriarchal Relationships, Disability]

You know what is not fun? I am still stuck in bed for pretty much all the times I'm not at work, because my back hates me! This is me giving a seriously negative look at my back! (ಠ_ಠ)

But the happy part is that being trapped in bed means I get to watch more Friends and now I have another disc analyzed thanks to the magic of typing! And positive thinking! ✽ ✾ ✿ ❀ ❁ ❃ ❋



An Annotated Index of Ross Geller: Disc 2

Episode 107: The One With The Blackout

Synopsis: A blackout over all of Manhattan results in wacky hijinks; Ross makes a belated move on Rachel but is interrupted by a cat which turns out to have an attractive Italian man (Paolo) as its guardian.

Analysis: This is the infamous "friend zone" episode (which I've covered in part in the mega-post). The Friends pass the time by playing the "weirdest place you've ever done it" game, and Rachel confesses to Ross that she's never had a deeply passionate sexual relationship--the weirdest place she's ever done it was "the foot of the bed". This doesn't really fit super well with Rachel's characterization throughout the series and backstory so far. It will be mentioned in just a couple episodes (Episode 117) that she had sex on her parents' bed with a boy whose father was a major financial rival to the family--that sounds somewhat more passionate than "the foot of the bed" with (we presume) Barry. Also, in the pilot (Episode 101), we had this exchange:

Monica: So how you doing today? Did you sleep okay? Talk to Barry? I can't stop smiling.
Rachel: I can see that. You look like you slept with a hanger in your mouth.
Monica: I know, he's just so, so... Do you remember you and Tony DeMarco?
Rachel: Oh, yeah.
Monica: Well, it's like that. With feelings.
Rachel: Oh wow. Are you in trouble.

So if none of this fits with Rachel's characterization and backstory, I feel entitled to ask why it is here. For one, obviously, this is a setup to her falling for Paolo and dragging out the Ross Nice Guy / Will They Won't They storyline. But I also have a sneaking suspicion that this is here so that Ross can continue to be superior to Rachel.

We learned a few episodes back that Ross was a virgin until he slept with Carol, and we the viewers may choose to assume that he's only ever been with her. Whereas we already know about a couple guys in Rachel's past (Barry and Tony DeMarco) and will learn about a third one (Billy Dreskin) in a few episodes. None of this definitely adds up to Rachel being more sexually experienced than Ross, but it's interesting to me that here we have Rachel turning to Ross (of all the Friends on offer!) for advice on whether there is the possibility for passion in her future. And Ross typically lectures her on how the thing she wants isn't that important ("Passion is way overrated.") before then turning cryptic and promising her the thing she wants ("See, I see.... big passion in your future.") with the subtext that she'll get that if she does things his way.

Anyway. Joey lectures Ross that he's "in the friend zone" and that he needs to go make his move on Rachel now. And so of course Ross has to do a big buildup ("OK, I have a question. Well, actually, it's not so much a question as.. more of a general wondering... ment.") instead of just saying, "Would you like to go out on a date with me this Saturday?" or whatever. And it feels like he can't straight-up say that and instead must do this circuitous confessional not merely because he's afraid of hearing No, but maybe also because he thinks he needs to do a confessional infodump of all his many feels for Rachel right there. And no doubt scare the poor woman to death.

Which sort of brings us back to the problem that Ross has spent so long building up this crush he has on the idea of Rachel (or, and here I quote LucyChi, his Rachel Goal), that he is officially in the Creepy Nice Guy Zone. Rachel would be starting this relationship from square one; Ross has been around the Monopoly board in his head for at least eighteen laps riding the little top hat. That's a fundamental mismatch of relationship expectations. But I digress, and a cat leaps on Ross' shoulders and startles him into a failure to ask Rachel out. And while Rachel and Phoebe try to find the cat's guardian, Rachel also finds Paolo who is supposed to look like sex on a stick and the episode will end with her in his arms, passionately making out.

The interesting thing here is how Ross reacts in order to head off the Paolo situation. He could go to Rachel and have an honest conversation: "Look, this might be a bad time now, but earlier I was hoping to ask you out on a date and I just really wanted to get the offer on the table. I really think we would be great together, but I understand if that's not something you want to try right now." But that would make Ross vulnerable and put the option to say No on the table and we're not going to have that. (Also: it would give a woman agency. Slippery slope.)

Instead, Ross tries to appeal to Paolo, which makes literally no sense in the world unless you think of women as objects owned by men. Ross tells him that "See, um, the point is that... Rachel and I should be, er, together." and that "if you get in the... way, of us becoming a thing, then I would be, well, very sad." Paolo has literally no reason to care if Ross is very sad. He doesn't know the guy from Adam! He could be a creepy stalker who tries to control Rachel's sex life. (Oh wait.) And yet I think we're supposed to see Paolo as kind of a jerk (and probably some xenophobic tropes about foreigners seducing our women) for not respecting Ross' dibs.

Furthermore, Ross' attempt to scare Paolo off is a huge trespass on Rachel's agency to pick which man she wants to be with. Ross wants to narrow the pool of available men (one man at a time, via heart-to-heart talks with them, apparently) until Rachel's only options are Ross vs. No One. Whereas if Ross were honest with her about his feelings and respected her agency to pick, then her options would be Ross vs. Everyone Else Who Might Be Interested. Because he refuses to extend her that agency, Ross is trying to control Rachel's love life by tampering with her available choices.

--

Open Wide...

In the News

Here is some stuff in the news today...

[Content Note: Possible death and injury; possible terrorism] Over the weekend, Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 vanished with 239 people on board, and the investigation has still not turned up any evidence of wreckage. Officials are now investigating "the possibility that it disintegrated mid-flight...after climbing to a cruising altitude of 35,000 feet between Kuala Lumpur and Beijing." What a strange and terrible story. I feel so deeply for the people whose loved ones are missing, who have no answers as to what happened to them.

[CN: Anti-choice terrorism] Bail has been set at $100,000 for 24-year-old Zachary Jordan Klundt, who is facing "four felony charges, three of them from the break-in at All Families Healthcare, a medical clinic that provides the only abortion services in [Montana's] Flathead Valley." Klundt is the son of Twyla Klundt, a board member of Hope Pregnancy Ministries, whose mission is "to honor Christ by providing an alternative to abortion through life affirming education and intervention, offering help and hope to women in need." Just like Jesus would do!

[CN: Anti-choice terrorism] Relatedly, I highly recommend Tara Culp-Ressler's piece published today on the harassment of abortion providers, "Meet America's Most Hated Doctors."

[CN: Sexual violence; reproductive coercion] Good news: Canada's Supreme Court "has unanimously upheld the sexual assault conviction of a Nova Scotia man who tried to trick his girlfriend into becoming pregnant by poking holes in her condoms. ...In Friday's 7-0 ruling, the high court ruled that Hutchinson deprived the woman of her ability to consent to sex."

[CN: Sexual violence] I would say this story is unbelievable, except it is perfectly, terribly believable: "The top Army prosecutor for sexual assault cases has been suspended after a lawyer who worked for him recently reported he'd groped her and tried to kiss her at a sexual-assault legal conference more than two years ago." Meanwhile: The US Senate has blocked passage of Senator Kirsten Gillibrand's Military Justice Improvement Act, after it failed to "receive the 60 procedural votes needed to break a filibuster and progress." The legislation "would have removed the prosecution of sexually violent crimes in the military from the chain-of-command and given the responsibility to independent military prosecutors."

Senator Bernie Sanders, the only Democratic Socialist serving in the US Senate, says he is considering running for president. Good luck, Bernie Sanders! I would almost definitely vote for you!

Meanwhile, Republican Senator John McCain, founding member of the two-man I Lost the Presidency to Barack Obama Club, is now the least popular Senator in the country. LOL! Thanks for finally getting on board, AMERICA.

[CN: Hostility to consent] Jill Pantozzi covers how Fan Expo Canada's "Cuddle a Cosplayer" marketing strategy is ignorant and dangerous and gross.

Why We Rescue is a neat site documenting people's stories of rescuing cats and dogs. Please note if you click on an individual story, audio begins to play, but you can turn it off and read the stories (where the transcripts have been been added; some are still waiting).

Open Wide...

True Detective Finale

[Content Note: Descriptions of violence. Major spoiler warnings.]

image of Rust (Matthew McConaughey) and Marty (Woody Harrelson) sitting across a table from one another, drinking beer, deep in discussion

Can we talk about the True Detective finale last night? Because OMG.

I won't write up a whole thing, because I just want to head right to comments for discussion, but a couple of quick observations:

1. In one of my favorite pieces of characterization, in terms of defining these two characters right down to the end, I loved how Rust was feeling all kinds of things about having seen Errol Childress (aka Murder Boy) in 1995 and irrationally holding himself accountable for not magically discerning that he was a monster, while Marty was feeling no kinds of things about having killed Reggie Ledoux years earlier, effectively halting the formal investigation that might have led to Childress and saving all the lives he took in the interim. Throughout the series, we saw Rust sink into darkness over things he couldn't control, and Marty refuse to hold himself to account for losing control. That was a perfect juxtaposition at the end of this series.

2. I am not a huge fan of watching violence, but Rust headbutting Murder Boy while impaled on his knife was super badass.

3. They were never friends, for all those years. They only finally became friends at the very end. Love.

4. "Once there was only dark. And if you ask me, the light's winning."

All right all right all right.

Discuss.

Open Wide...

Rand Paul 4 Prez

This weekend was the annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), at which they held their 2016 straw poll to see who attendees wanted to see become the Republican nominee. And of course Senator Rand Paul (R-Eprehensible) ran away with it.

Rand Paul, son of repeat Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul, is terrible and does not belong anywhere near the White House, no matter how much he may occasionally look like a progressive ally on privacy issues.

It's rare the CPAC straw poll winner ever becomes the Republican nominee. The only reason I'm really mentioning it is to have another opportunity to say that Rand Paul is terrible—and to note that Senator Ted Cruz came in a distant second at 11%. Chris Christie barely registered. Looks like it's going to be another fun nominating year in a wide-open field for Republicans!

Open Wide...

Open Thread


Hosted by Let's Bake.

Open Wide...

Sunday Shuffle

The Civil Wars; I've Got This Friend

And you?

Open Wide...

Open Thread


Hosted by the Hickory House.
This week's open threads have been brought to you by vintage menu design.

Open Wide...

Open Thread


Hosted by Longchamps.

Open Wide...

Open Thread


Hosted by Melrod's.

Open Wide...

Open Thread


Hosted by Trader Vic's Chicago.

Open Wide...

The Virtual Pub Is Open

image of a pub Photoshopped to be named 'The Beloved Community Pub'
[Explanations: lol your fat. pathetic anger bread. hey your gay.]

Belly up to the bar,
and be in this space together.

Open Wide...

Blog Note

I've got a friend coming to visit for a long weekend tomorrow, so I'll be putting up the pub shortly and taking the rest of the week off.

I presume that I'm going to return on Monday, but my back is still giving me all kinds of grief, because of course I have been working full days, since: 1. A recovery that necessitates doing nothing is SO FUCKING BORING; and 2. I feel guilty when I'm not working. The combination of boredom and guilt is, for me, an irresistible incentive to ignore what my body needs.

Luckily, my visitor is coming fully prepared with a selection of terrible movies to force me to rest for a couple of days, lol.

If, for some reason, my return is delayed, I will let you know.

Open Wide...

Triggered, Continued

[Content Note: Narratives of oversensitivity; discussion of being triggered.]

The debate about trigger warnings and content notes (TWs/CNs) continues today, much of it surrounding a piece on the subject Jill Filipovic published at The Guardian entitled: "We've Gone Too Far with Trigger Warnings."

I don't really have much to add to what I already wrote yesterday, but here are a couple quick additional thoughts in response to some of the ongoing debate:

1. I keep seeing this phrase "gone too far." Too far for whom? Certainly not the people for whom TWs/CNs are useful, and might mean the difference between having a public panic attack and not having a public panic attack.

2. Having PTSD or other trauma-induced mental illness isn't a "vulnerability." That's a disablist mischaracterization.

3. The "infantilization" argument, which asserts that TWs/CNs treat readers, students, etc. like babies or weaklings, is really contemptuous of readers who appreciate TWs/CNs and the choice they provide. Offering choice doesn't diminish agency. Quite the opposite.

4. A frequent frame I'm seeing is that people who use TWs/CNs and people who have PTSD or other trauma-induced mental illness are mutually exclusive groups. To the contrary, often the people most invested in providing TWs/CNs to readers, students, friends, whomever are people who themselves experience triggers.

5. I really dislike the compilations of supposedly absurd TWs/CNs. What might appear "extreme" may be a writer's consideration for a specific reader. If you interact with your community a lot, you might be more aware of individual readers' needs. And dismissing attempts and sensitivity and inclusivity as nothing but "performativity" is shitty. Not for nothing, but I never get more fucking vile harassment than when I draw boundaries in this space to reduce harm for marginalized groups (which sometimes includes me and sometimes doesn't, depending on the situation). I know there are people who perform social justice crusader roles for cookies or whatever, but I can't imagine maintaining that facade for long unless this stuff really means something to you, because the cost is steep.

6. I don't understand this "you can't predict every single trigger ever" argument against the use of TWs/CNs. Because you might fail someone, you just resolve to definitely fail everyone? Okay.

7. The old HOW DO YOU EVEN EXIST IN THE WORLD? chestnut is flying fast and furious. You know—that ubiquitous exasperated rhetorical aimed at people who are triggered by stuff that most other people aren't. Well, here's the thing: For some people, existing in this world is actually very difficult.

And if you are someone who has survived abuse, or neglect, or poverty, or illness, or systemic oppression, or any one or more of the number of things that can leave someone with lingering consequences of trauma, but you've managed to survive without any triggers, or you've managed to find the resources and support and safety and space you needed to move beyond them, then good for you. You are very lucky.

I am very lucky. I am still occasionally triggered, but nothing like I was 20 years ago, where I was just emerging from three years of profound sexual abuse and felt like a raw nerve walking through the world. Part of that was my determination to process what had happened to me, and part of it was the hard work of doing that processing, and part of it was the sheer stupid luck of having the resources and support and safety and space I have needed, which sometimes just meant having a friend in the right place at the right time.

What if I'd not had this friend or that friend in the right place at the right time? During a rough month, or a single terrible afternoon? I dunno.

All I know is that if nothing ever happened to you that was bad enough to leave you traumatized, lucky you. And if something bad happened but you have survived it and/or processed it trigger-free, lucky you. And anyone who didn't isn't weak or damaged or oversensitive or too goddamn fragile for the world. They're unlucky.

If you understand why conservatives telling people without boots to pull up their bootstraps is indecent garbage, then it shouldn't be too difficult for you to understand why sneering at someone with triggers "I got over it" is indecent garbage, too.

Open Wide...

Today in Your Progressive Pope

[Content Note: Homophobia; clergy abuse; rape apologia.]

Today, Pope Francis is making BIG HEADLINES over his support for civil unions. Wow, right?! Pretty amazing! So what did he actually say?

"Marriage is between a man and a woman."

"The secular states want to justify civil unions to regulate different situations of living together, driven by the need to regulate economic aspects between people, like ensuring health care," he states, saying he can't identify the ways different countries are addressing the matter.

"We need to see the different cases and evaluate them in their variety," he states.
I would say that is way less enthusiastic and exciting than I expected reading headlines about Pope Francis endorsing civil unions, except that's pretty much exactly the milquetoast bullshit advertised by the media as Radical Progressive Popery that I've come to expect.

There was something in the interview whence came the Pope's thoughts on civil unions that I find rather noteworthy, despite the fact it's not getting a lot of media attention:
The interview contains some of the pope's only public words on the sexual abuse crisis, which continues to roil dioceses across the world. Asked about the subject, Francis replies: "I want to say two things."

"The cases of abuse are awful because they leave profound wounds," he states. "Benedict XVI was very courageous and has opened a way. On this way the church has done so much. Perhaps most of all."

"The statistics of the phenomenon of violence against children are staggering, but show clearly that the vast majority of abuse happens in the family setting and neighborhood," he continues.

"The Catholic church is maybe the only public institution to have moved with transparency and responsibility," he states. "No one else has done more. Yet the church is the only one to be attacked."
The Catholic Church has done "perhaps most of all" for victims of childhood abuse! And everyone is picking on the Catholic Church in spite of their transparency and responsibility (LOL FOREVER) even though their representatives don't abuse children nearly as much as other people!

This fucking guy.

If colluding with police to cover up sex crimes constitutes transparency, and blaming gay priests constitutes responsibility, I'd hate to see what a lack of transparency and responsibility looks like.

Open Wide...

An Observation

[Content Note: Fat bias.]

I really dislike it when I get a catalog from a plus-size clothier who uses absolutely no fat women in their catalog. (Ditto their websites.) It's not just a visibility thing (although that, too!), but also just a practical issue of wanting to see how clothes look on fat bodies.

Not all fat bodies are alike, so what any given piece of clothing looks like on another fat woman may not be how it looks on me. But it would still be nice to see some of the clothes on fat bodies that look something like mine.

There is a reason that fat retailers don't use fat models and mannequins: They say it's because fat people don't want to see bodies that look like ours; that we, like everyone else, are so entrained in fat hatred that we reject the appearance of fat models and mannequins.

That may be true for some fat folks, but I think there's a lot of fat folks who would very much like to see clothes presented in a way that gives a better picture of what they'd look like when we wear them.

And, frankly, part of the reason fat folks tend to respond negatively to seeing clothes on fat bodies is because the clothes look like shit on fat bodies, because they're not really designed for fat bodies in the first place. That's a design issue which has nothing to do with the self-loathing of which we're universally accused.

Design clothes that look good on fat models and mannequins, and maybe more fat people will have a positive response to them.

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Zelda the Black and Tan Mutt sitting at the window looking out at dusk

The Watch Dog watches. Or: Dorito Ears in Silhouette.

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

The Wednesday Blogaround

This blogaround brought to you by potatoes.

Recommended Reading:

Lauren: [Content Note: Sexual violence] Campus Rape and the Rise of the Academic Industrial Complex

Imani: [CN: Misogynoir] Black Women Are an Electoral Voting Force. Recognize.

Anil: [CN: Racism; xenophobia; homophobia] Queering Immigration [Hmm, this link appears to be down at the moment; I'mma leave the link with the hope the piece goes back up.]

Jessie: [CN: Racism; misogyny; classism] The Second Wave: Trouble with White Feminism

Angry Asian Man: [CN: Racism] Just Another "Asian Guy" Getting Coffee

Jeremy: [CN: Homophobia] GOP Reps Thrilled to Receive Award from America's Two Most Anti-LGBT Organizations

[CN: Racism] At least three newspapers couldn't resist using offensive headlines to announce 12 Years a Slave having won Best Picture: See coverage at Black Youth Project and Hypervocal.

Leave your links and recommendations in comments...

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime

[Content Note: There is a strobe-light effect in this video.]



Salt-N-Pepa: "Shoop"

Open Wide...

In the News

Here is some stuff in the news today!

The Guardian: "The US has formally denounced Russia for failing to attend the meeting over the Budapest Agreement in Paris earlier today. The US secretary of state, John Kerry, hosted the meeting with his UK and Ukrainian counterparts, William Hague and Andriy Deshchytsia. In brief remarks earlier, Kerry said the meeting was 'regrettably missing one member'—Russia—which was the other signatory to the so-called 1994 Budapest Memorandum, in which Ukraine agreed to relinquish its nuclear weapons in return for security assurances from the world powers. The state department said: 'The United States had conveyed an invitation to the Russian Federation to the meeting …We deeply regret that the Russian Federation declined to attend.'"

Oh, so now that it's them being surveilled, they give a shit: "The CIA Inspector General's Office has asked the Justice Department to investigate allegations of malfeasance at the spy agency in connection with a yet-to-be released Senate Intelligence Committee report into the CIA's secret detention and interrogation program, McClatchy has learned. The criminal referral may be related to what several knowledgeable people said was CIA monitoring of computers used by Senate aides to prepare the study. The monitoring may have violated an agreement between the committee and the agency."

[Content Note: War on agency] Last night, Alabama legislators in the state House of Representatives approved "four abortion restrictions that threaten to cut off women's access to reproductive health care in the state. Taken together, the package of anti-choice measures represents some of the harshest legislation in the nation." Chip, chip, chipping away at Roe until it becomes an empty statute. It would be cool if the Democratic national leadership were making this assault on reproductive rights a national conversation, but I guess they're too busy pandering to white men.

Media Matters for America has launched the Mythopedia, ahead of this year's CPAC. The site, which welcomes you with a search bar and the instruction to "Search the Dictionary of Conservative Lies," will serve as a fact-checking tool and "an online compendium of truths and lies peddled by conservatives."

[CN: Guns; violence; harassment] Oscar Pistorius, currently on trial for the murder of Reeva Steenkamp, has a defense team who are apparently just as big a collection of jackasses as he is: "The third state witness to testify in Oscar Pistorius's murder trial told the high court in Pretoria on Wednesday he was inundated with phone calls after his cellphone number was read out in court. ...A member of Pistorius's defence team read out Johnson's cellphone number in court while cross-examining him on Tuesday."

[CN: Domestic violence] Democratic Florida Representative Alan Grayson has been accused by his soon-to-be-ex-wife of shoving her into a door during an altercation. Grayson's press secretary says the charges are false and his office released a statement saying she started it. FFS.

If you can't get enough of the Totes Progressive Pope, you are IN LUCK, because he's getting his own magazine: "The 68-page Il Mio Papa (My Pope) will hit Italian newsstands on Ash Wednesday, offering a glossy medley of papal pronouncements and photographs, along with peeks into his personal life. Each weekly issue will also include a pullout centerfold of the pope, accompanied by a quote. ...The magazine also hopes to transmit the down-to-earth, no-nonsense advice that Francis offers during his weekly encounters with the faithful in St Peter's Square and elsewhere." Sounds terrific!

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel (my mouth still tastes like sulfur every time I have to say that) wants to expand Soldier Field, home of the Chicago Bears, so that Chicago might one day host the Superbowl. To quote Kodos: "Expanding Soldier Field for one hypothetical football game is not a sustainable plan for the future of Chicago, @RahmEmanuel." Leaving aside the fact that this plan is more evidence of shitty priorities, I can't even imagine how Soldier Field can be expanded architecturally. "Just put clown cars on top of the spaceship!" Yeesh.

Open Wide...

Recommended Reading

[Content Note: Death penalty; prison abuse; dehumanization; racism; violence.]

Ray Jasper, a prisoner on death row in Texas: "A Letter From Ray Jasper, Who Is About to Be Executed." I'm not even going to excerpt it. Just go read the whole damn thing.

Open Wide...