Open Thread


Hosted by a Ranchu.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Of what skill that you possess in abundance are you most proud?

Open Wide...

Today in Fat Hatred

by Shakesville Moderator Hallelujah_Hippo

[Content Note: Fat hatred, dehumanization, medical malfeasance, fat bias]

We have had extensive conversations in this space about how fat hatred kills people. We have these conversations over and over and over again, because it continues to be something that kills people, over and over and over again. Today Liss shared with me, via Shaker P, yet another example of just how deep-seated fat hatred is in medical practice and I felt the need to call it out once again.

On Monday, the ever progressive (not actually a true statement) Washington Post published a piece by Edward Thompson—a doctor who I believe is writing under his real name—which is, as Liss described it, one of the most vile, dehumanizing, exploitative pieces of fat hatred I've ever read."

The actual title is 'A Morbidly Obese Patient Tests the Limits of a Doctor's Compassion,' so right away we're made aware that this piece is about Compassionate Doctors and the trying fat people who are so terribly cruel with all their testing the limits of everyone's compassion with their fatness.

The first sentence sets the tone:

The patient is large. Very large. At more than 600 pounds, he is a mountain of flesh.
And I almost stopped reading right there because when you start out by reducing a human being to a 'very large…mountain of flesh,' there is very little hope that you are going to say anything that I want to read. The piece just gets worse from here.
"My stomach hurts," he says, his voice surprisingly high and childlike.
Fat Stereotype #1: Fat people are 'childlike,' simple fools unable to take care of themselves and their own basic needs. The implication of this stereotype is inevitably, as here: If they'd just grow up and take some responsibility they'd be thin and pleasant to look at just like everyone is morally obligated to be.
Asked if he's ever felt this kind of pain before, he says, "No, never. At least, not like this."

"Well, what'd you expect?" the unit secretary mutters, only half to herself.
Fat Stereotype #2: Fat people are all—and should expect nothing other than to be—in debilitating pain. Never mind that fat people, like not-fat people, generally seek medical treatment when they experience pain that isn't normal for their bodies.

But, referring back to Fat Stereotype #1, obviously, the only reason anyone is fat is because they are an irresponsible, uninformed, and stupid person who cannot properly understand the world around them. Including important rules like: You aren't allowed to be simultaneously fat and comfortable.
The patient is in his 40s. He spends his days on the sofa at home, surviving on disability checks related to his back pain.
Fat Stereotype #3: All fat people are fat because they lounge around all day, every day, sitting on their asses doing nothing but eating junk food and watching TV. Fat Stereotype #4: All fat people are lazy, and lots of them are scam artists who mooch off hard-working, honest, thin taxpayers by tricking the government into paying them for their back pain.

Never mind that there is no indication whatsoever, if this doctor even bothered to inquire, whether the patient's weight and/or inactivity was, in part, a result of his disability, or whether, as is clearly implied, that his disability is the result of his weight and inactivity.
Facing him, I feel momentarily put off.
Fat people are gross. In case you hadn't heard. Off-putting by virtue of their existence. Like ghouls and monsters.
I'm not sure just where to start the examination,
I'm no medical doctor or anything, so I could be wrong, but my totally uneducated guess would be: Wherever you start the examination with every other human you see in the ER complaining of abdominal pain. But, like I said, I'm not a doctor.
when I begin, my hands look small and insignificant against the panorama of skin they're kneading.
Again, let's remind everyone that this man has a panorama of skin; he's hugeand freakish and makes the doctor's hands look small and insignificant. Not for nothing, but this is definitely analogous to how monsters are frequently described in literature all the damn time.
It's hard to tell, exactly, but I think his pain is coming from somewhere around his stomach.
Again, I'm not a doctor, but this does not seem terribly surprising since, in the patient's own words, his stomach hurts; but it's a good thing the doctor verified it (as best he could, there's a whole panorama here to circumnavigate, remember) because we also need to remember that fat people are fat because they are stupid and simple, so they can't be trusted to actually know what's what about anything, including their own bodies.
Awaiting [the surgeon's] arrival, we try to shoot some X-rays. When we roll him onto his side, though, he turns an unnatural shade of blue-gray and can't tolerate the position long enough for us to put the X-ray cassette behind his back.
Which is obviously and exclusively because he's a fatty fat person, and not at all, possibly, because he's suffering from acute abdominal pain. Again, I'm not a doctor, so my thoughts on this are clearly suspect.
We try a chest X-ray, turning up the power to the maximum setting. All we see is white… he is a walking lead shield.
Again, excellent use of dehumanization and monstrous construction. This isn't a normal human; this is a walking wall of lead. How can he even expect basic medical care or decency in a hospital for humans when he is barely human himself?
Our standard GI cocktail of shot-in-the-dark digestive tonics plinks into his stomach without any effect.
"Plinks." Because, as a fat man, he obviously has a GINORMOUS stomach that cannot possibly be remotely affected by 'standard' medical quantities.
Morphine at doses high enough to make me dance on tables merely makes him a bit drowsy.
This is not an unusual phenomenon among people—of any size—with chronic back pain. Something of which, one imagines, any doctor would be aware.

But this doctor is more concerned with his own unhappiness at giving his fat patient so much morphine—a thought that even seems to supersede concern that the patient is still in acute abdominal pain. After all, fat people are monstrous non-entities completely to blame for their own discomfort and health problems; what matters is how medical providers feel in relation to them.
I talk to the patient between procedures, trying to get a sense of him as a person. He recites a litany of consultants he's seen for his back pain, his headaches, a chronic rash on his ankles, his shortness of breath, his weakness, his insomnia and his fatigue.
Fat Stereotype #5: Fat people are whiny hypochondriacs. Fat Stereotype #6: All fat people's health problems would magically go away if they would just stop being fat!
"All of them have failed me," he says, adding that the paramedics didn't have the proper ultra-wide, ultra-sturdy gurney to accommodate his body.

"The Americans with Disabilities Act says that they should have the proper equipment to handle me, the same as they do for anyone else," he says indignantly. "I'm entitled to that. I'll probably have to sue to get the care I really need."
(emphasis added)

Fat people! Expecting basic medical care like everyone else! Where do they get off with their entitlements and outrageous demands!! If they want medical care like everyone else, then they should try being thin like everyone else! They're clearly just looking for handouts and clogging up the legal system with frivolous lawsuits because they are whiny and immature and have no sense of personal responsibility. Etc.

Here, I would like to insert that a lot of what we talk about around here has to do with human rights and that ALL people are entitled to food and medical care. That includes fat people. Fat people exist, period; just like people with latex allergies exist and people who can't take penicillin exist (and those are not mutually exclusive from fat people). Casting the provision of basic medical care for fat people as some bizarre and extravagant luxury rather than a basic human right they are entitled by by virtue of being human is a pile of eliminationist and hostile garbage.
We've placed the patient in a room with an oversize hospital bed, so at least he's resting comfortably.
We've done the bare minimum of providing him with a bed; we are spectacular human beings!
Finally, we move an ultrasound machine into his room — it barely fits between the bed and the wall
Because this man is SO FAT that he needs a larger bed, he is breaking the hospital procedures; this is all his fault for existing the way he does. This is clearly, according to the doctor, not a case of a gross lack of accessibility, having rooms too small to accommodate both diagnostic equipment AND a fat patient who needs it; this is a case of fat people being too inconvenient for the world to deal with and they really should stop it already.
A half-hour later, the chief of radiology comes out of the room, rings of sweat under his arms. "I think we have something," he says. "A gallstone."
(emphasis added)

Remember everyone, this dude is totally fat!! He's so fat the chief of radiology is sweating from the effort of trying to diagnose him! This is a truly trenchant and relevant detail for the story; I almost forgot it was about a fat man who is beyond an inconvenience to everyone with whom he interacts.

There follows a description of the surgeon assigned to the patient spending time and making phone calls trying to get the patient moved to another hospital rather than admitting him where he is, because the surgeon just doesn't want to deal with him. The way it is narrated, this is taken to be understandable; there is certainly no critique or even implied disapproval of the surgeon's actions. I guess this hospital's policy is: Fat people—unload them anywhere you can, because we don't have time to deal with them; we have real humans to see.

But, it turns out no other hospital can take this monstrous man until the next day:
"Don't put him in a room right over the ER," whispers the unit secretary to the admission clerk. "The floor won't support him. He'll come crashing through and kill us all."
Ah hah hahha! My aching sides! You know those fat people—those monstrous, lead-walled, panoramic fat folks—they'll break the world!!! Ceilings in hospitals were never designed to hold several hundred pounds at a time!

As awful as this piece is up until now, I was still surprised by how awful the next sentence is:
Glancing across the hall at the patient, I see by his eyes that he's heard her comment, and I'm suddenly sure that he's heard all of the side remarks aimed his way.
(emphasis added)

Fat people! They exist in the world and can hear you! They may even be entirely aware of your loathing, your disgust, your discomfort, and your judgment. They may even (probably) take these things into account when deciding if the acute pain in their side is bad enough to face the dehumanization, the hatred, the vitriol, and the humiliation of interacting with medical staff (you know, those compassionate care givers ostensibly tasked with giving a shit about their well-being and health and trying to diagnose and help them) or if they should just wait it out and see if it gets better.

Fat hatred kills people. Not least of all because sometimes living with pain and not knowing what is may just be preferable to being dehumanized, hated, and sneered at by the people you have to trust in order to access medical care.

I wish I could say this is the end, but it's not. Things get worse from here.
Finally, a slew of huffing, puffing, grunting attendants wheel him down the hall, leaving me to reflect on his plight.
Let's remind everyone that he's fat, in case anyone has forgotten, and share that it takes a whole crew of people doing strenuous labor just to move him down the hall! I mean, one sentence ago we almost acknowledged that he was a person with feelings completely aware of the abuse and hatred leveled at him by everyone in his vicinity; let's not reflect on that or anything, let's get back to focusing on the thin people (ie, real humans who actually matter).
He lies at the very large center of his own world—a world in which all the surgery mankind has to offer cannot heal the real pain he suffers.
So, again, this man isn't just in the center of his own world, it's a very large center. Because he's SO FAT; get it? Did you forget he was fat? I almost did; I'm glad our narrator made sure to remind us again that this entire situation is a result of how completely and utterly fat this particular patient is.

Additionally, (again, as a non-doctor), I feel like 'all the surgery mankind has to offer' could start healing his pain by removing his gallstone and then maybe not treating him like a piece of filthy and inconvenient garbage that is just SO MUCH trouble to deal with.

But, bitter sarcasm side, I know what the narrator means.

Fat Stereotype #7: All fat people are broken and in terrible emotional pain.

He doesn't mean 'the abdominal pain so bad this man sought medical attention even knowing the rank amounts of hatred and disgust he would be subjected to,' he means 'the inner pain that all fat people have which they try to assuage with eating and laziness.' Because no one is fat for any reason other than emotional dysfunction and a lack of loving themselves. Fat people are broken from the ground up and that brokenness is clearly proved by their fatness.

This narrative is utter reductive, dehumanizing, and vile garbage. The only thing you can tell about a fat person by looking at them is that they are fat. You know nothing about their emotional state, their life, or their inner self; to claim that you do is to continue to silence, marginalize, and dehumanize them.
The patient lies trapped in his own body, like a prisoner in an enormous, fleshy castle.
Again, this doctor has NO WAY OR KNOWING how this man feels about his own body, he is projecting lazy, dehumanizing narratives onto a man he doesn't even see as fully human.

Also, we were in danger of forgetting this patient is fat, so we needed another reminded that it's not just a castle, but an enormous (not big), fleshy (i.e., Ewwww!! Gross!!!!) castle.
And though he must feel wounded by the ER personnel's remarks…
Honestly dude, you don't seem to give much of a shit about how wounded this man may or may not feel by the way EVERYONE in the story (including, you, Dr. Thompson) have treated him during this entire encounter, so just shut the fuck up about it, okay. One sentence pretending you care doesn't make your writing any less of a garbage nightmare of fat hatred and eliminationist rhetoric without an ounce of empathy or self-reflection.

Especially when you finish the sentence with:
…he seems to find succor in knowing that there's no comment so cutting that it can't be soothed by the balm of 8,000 calories per day.
Fat Stereotype #8: Fat people are fat because they soothe away the vile way the world treats them with emotional eating! It's a fact, proven by science! This is a doctor, so he clearly knows everything about everything, including why all fat people are fat.

(Note from Liss: The doctor claimed in comments of the piece that he knows how many calories the patient consumes because the patient told him. In which case: I question whether publicly disclosing that information is not a breach of doctor-patient confidentiality. If it's not a technical breach, it is certainly breaches the spirit of the provision, as far as I am concerned. Further, if it is accurate that the patient was consuming 8,000 calories per day, that is evidence of disordered eating, which is something doctors should be keen to treat as a medical issue, not ridicule and sneer at with disgust on the pages of a major international publication.)
Later on in my shift, still feeling traces of the patient's presence, I sit and stare at my 700-calorie dinner, all appetite gone, wondering where empathy ends and compassion begins.
That truly is a question for the ages, Dr. Thompson. I'm also not a philosopher, but I have a sneaking suspicion that neither empathy or compassion (neither of which have been displayed by anyone in this narrative, by the way; quite the opposite, in fact) are anywhere near write a naval-gazing and dehumanizing piece about a fat patient, how he was totally gross and disgusting and awful, how he is stupid and childlike and whiny, how he is an emotional and stunted human unable to care for himself and how he is an object lesson in what not to do; with a side-helping of fat hating narratives and projections.

But, that's just me, I guess we disagree on this one.
I know why my colleagues and I are so glad to have this patient out of the ER and stowed away upstairs…
Stowed away, like an unused piece of furniture, because he's huge and unwieldy and just an object of inconvenience, not an actual human being.
…he's an oversize mirror…
Another reminder that he is fat ("oversized"), in case you'd forgotten, and another example of describing him as an object rather than a human being.
…reminding us of our own excesses.
Ultimately, he is not a person in his own right, but a symbol. A breathing metaphor for excess. A lesson for thin people to learn from and guard against.
It's easier to look away and joke at his expense than it is to peer into his eyes and see our own appetites staring back.
Appetites. In case, again, you forgot he was fat.

How about you try peering into his eyes and SEEING HIS HUMANITY you unmitigated, unempathetic asshole? You could try that, just for a start; maybe then it wouldn't be so easy to 'look away and joke at his expense.'

And again, this patient is still an object that reflects thin people's (implied: real humans) appetites back at them. Did you forget the patient was fat? He's totally fat; he's a symbol of 'appetites' because he EATS ALL THE THINGS, ALL THE TIME; that's why he's fat.

And this is how the piece concludes:
Though I have no way of knowing it, within a few months a crane will hoist the patient's body through a hole cut in the side of his house, a hole that allowed EMS personnel to lower the body onto their new ultra-wide, ultra-sturdy gurney.
There is then a note about the author:
Thompson worked in emergency medicine for 32 years and now practices family medicine in Frederick County, Md. This is an edited version of a story that appeared in Pulse — Voices From the Heart of Medicine, an online magazine of stories and poems from patients and health-care professionals.
Let me just tell you: If I lived in Frederick County, MD, I would feel TOTALLY unsafe going to an ER for help after reading this; I would have no reason to expect I would be treated like a human being worthy of empathy or understanding, or as anything other than a freak, an object, and a moral lesson for not conforming to expectations of what a human should be.

And this is part of how fat hatred kills people.

This attitude, blatantly recounted in a doctor's own words, is what fat people can expect to face when they ask for help. The game of 'is the pain bad enough to deal with dehumanization and humiliation just to find out what it is?' of 'I don't know if I have the personal fortitude to deal with those looks and those comments and that hatred today.'

Fat hatred kills people.

It is unacceptable and needs to stop.

Open Wide...

Throwback Thursdays

image of me as a toddler feeding carrots to a horse through a fence

Me feeding carrots to Todie, a horse owned by neighbors, summer of 1975. My mom and I used to walk down to the pasture, which was maybe 100 yards from our house, and it always seemed like the longest walk in the world, because I couldn't wait to see Todie, and his small companion pony Princess.

[Please share your own throwback pix in comments. Just make sure the pix are just of you and/or you have consent to post from other living people in the pic. And please note that they don't have to be pictures from childhood, especially since childhood pix might be difficult for people who come from abusive backgrounds or have transitioned or lots of other reasons. It can be a picture from last week, if that's what works for you. And of course no one should feel obliged to share a picture at all! Only if it's fun!]

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

Zelda serves as sentinel in front of me while I rest on the couch yesterday. Because the Watch Dog Watches.

image of Zelda the Black and Tan Mutt lying on the floor in front of the couch

She is ever-present. So many kisses.

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

So Gross

[Content Note: Rape culture.]

One of Lauren Chief Elk's and my favorite, ahem, topics of conversation is what a rancid heap of rape apologist garbage Law & Order: Special Victims Unit actually is. We could literally talk about that shit ALL DAY. Because it is endlessly infuriating that a show which purports to engage in anti-rape advocacy is, in reality, rife with the entrenchment of rape culture narratives.

Anyway. The other day, while flipping channels from my super-bored convalescence, I happened to catch an amazing scene on an old episode of L&O:SVU. I backed up the broadcast and recorded it on my phone (because I'm high-tech like that). So forgive the shitty quality and my reflection on the screen.

Assistant District Attorney Alexandra Cabot, a thin blonde white woman, and Detective Olivia Benson, a thin brunette white woman, walk down the hallway of a municipal court building together.

Cabot: Olivia, all rape victims lie about something. You know that. How much they had to drink, who they were with the night before, what their boyfriend—

Benson: She picked the wrong thing to lie about. One lie is fine, even two, but, Alex, there's a pattern here. I mean, how much damage control can you do?
"All rape victims lie about something." Sure. Perfect. Great job as always, SVU.

By the way, the victim who had lied too many times? A black immigrant woman.

Law & Order: SVU is not a show that challenges the rape culture; it is a show that upholds the rape culture. I'm not saying it's not terrific that there are survivors who have been inspired to tell their stories or report their assaults by the show. I'm not saying no one is allowed to like the show or find anything useful about it. I'm not saying don't watch it, if you want to watch it. Most of us consume and enjoy some problematic things. Even I have been known to hate-watch SVU when I have overwhelming frustrations about the rape culture and nowhere else at which to direct my anger. It's a perfect outlet for vague rape culture rage!

What I am saying is that this persistent narrative about how SVU is doing effective anti-rape advocacy is bullshit. Exhibit 1,235.

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime

[Content Note: This video opens with a motorcycle accident. It's staged for the video, but it might be triggering to anyone who's lost someone in a traffic accident.]



Toni Braxton: "Unbreak My Heart"

Open Wide...

In the News

Here is some stuff in the news today!

[Content Note: Surveillance; civil rights violations; hostility to consent] Big Brother was watching you: "Britain's surveillance agency GCHQ, with aid from the US National Security Agency, intercepted and stored the webcam images of millions of internet users not suspected of wrongdoing, secret documents reveal. GCHQ files dating between 2008 and 2010 explicitly state that a surveillance program codenamed Optic Nerve collected still images of Yahoo webcam chats in bulk and saved them to agency databases, regardless of whether individual users were an intelligence target or not. In one six-month period in 2008 alone, the agency collected webcam imagery—including substantial quantities of sexually explicit communications—from more than 1.8 million Yahoo user accounts globally. Yahoo reacted furiously to the webcam interception when approached by the Guardian. The company denied any prior knowledge of the program, accusing the agencies of 'a whole new level of violation of our users' privacy.'" I don't even know what to say anymore.

[CN: War; displacement] Despite a cease-fire agreement, the situation in South Sudan continues to deteriorate. There are increasing numbers of civilian deaths and rapes, and people are fleeing their homes in search of safe refuge. "The medical aid group Doctors Without Borders said Wednesday that patients had been killed in their beds at the Teaching Hospital in Malakal. Across South Sudan, medical equipment has been looted and wards burned to the ground. In one instance, an entire hospital was destroyed." Meanwhile: I would love to know if anyone who regularly watches their local news, or any network news, has heard a fucking thing about the violence in South Sudan.

[CN: War on agency] The West Virginia House of Delegates has passed legislation "that would ban abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy in the state. Doctors who performed abortions after that point would be subject to up to five years in prison, as well as fines of up to $5,000, if the bill succeeds in the state senate. Physicians would also be required to file detailed reports to the West Virginia Division of Health for each abortion they performed. The reports would include the age and race of the [patient], the method of abortion, and a 'unique medical record identifying number to enable matching the report to the patient's medical records.'" This is rank intimidation against abortion providers and patients. When the fuck will our allegedly pro-choice national Democratic leadership, including our president, MAKE THIS INTIMIDATION A NATIONAL ISSUE? For fuck's sake.

[CN: Racism; classism] Another bank has been named in a federal complaint filed by the National Fair Housing Alliance, which has found evidence of foreclosure discrimination: "When Deutsche Bank forecloses on a house in a predominantly minority neighborhood, it doesn't bother maintaining the property in the same way that it does with foreclosures in white neighborhoods. ...[NFHA] looked at Deutsche Bank-owned properties in the Washington, D.C., Memphis, and Chicago metropolitan areas and found vast differences in upkeep between mostly white and mostly non-white neighborhoods." This, of course, affects property values in the neighborhood, as well as safety, as upkeep of vacant homes is related to crime.

[CN: Misogyny] Democratic Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick has signed emergency regulations "banning the shackling of incarcerated pregnant women." Good. "Shackling increases the risk of falling and injury prior to giving birth and the risk of blood clots post-partum. Restraints can interfere with medical professionals' ability to care for patients during labor, especially in emergency situations."

[CN: Homophobia] Secretary of State John Kerry says that the United States' advocacy for global LGBT civil rights is "a fight worth fighting." Cool.

[CN: Fat bias] The FDA is revamping the requirements for nutrition labels for the first time in ages. I like the idea of requiring serving sizes to reflect a more realistic serving, but I have all the mirthless laughter in the world for the GIANT CALORIES provision. "Look at this number, fatties!" You know, I read nutrition labels all the time, including the number of calories, and I am somehow still fat!

So many new planets! (Well, newly discovered planets.)

All the blubs forever over this story about a failed guide dog and the two little boys with disabilities whose lives that dog changed. ♥

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

[Content Note: Appropriation; racism.]

"I feel like 'embattled' or 'disgraced' will always follow my name. It's like that black football player who recently came out. He said, 'I just want to be known as a football player. I don't want to be known as a gay football player.' I know exactly what he's saying."Paula Deen.

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA NO.

Also: HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA FUCK YOU.

Here's a tip, Paula Deen: If you don't want to be forever known as That Disgraced Lady with a Cooking Show, then you have to stop doing heinous shit like comparing yourself being rightly vilified for engaging in racial discrimination to a gay man who doesn't want his identity to eclipse his career in a sport widely hostile to that identity.

And, not for nothing, Paula Deen, but if his words were so meaningful to you that you felt compelled to quote them during an interview, then maybe it was worth learning his fucking nameMichael Sam—instead of referring to him as "that black football player."

Open Wide...

Tough Luck, Bigots

[Content Note: Homophobia.]

Two good pieces of news from yesterday afternoon:

1. US District Judge Orlando Garcia ruled Texas' same-sex marriage ban unconstitutional because it "deprives some citizens of due process and equal protection under the law by stigmatizing their relationships and treating them differently from opposite-sex couples."

Garcia cited recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings as having trumped Texas' moves to ban gay marriage.

"Today's court decision is not made in defiance of the great people of Texas or the Texas Legislature, but in compliance with the U.S. Constitution and Supreme Court precedent," he said in his order. "Without a rational relation to a legitimate governmental purpose, state-imposed inequality can find no refuge in our U.S. Constitution."
Nice!

The ruling does not, however, immediately legalize same-sex marriage in Texas. Garcia stayed same-sex marriage from taking effect until his ruling can be appealed, which Republican State Attorney General (and gubernatorial candidate) Greg Abbott has said the state will do. Because of course they will.

The dominoes, they are falling.

2. Republican Arizona Governor Jan Brewer vetoed SB 1062, the legislation which "would have allowed businesses that asserted their religious beliefs the right to deny service to gay and lesbian customers." In her statement (pdf) about the veto, she wrote:
Senate Bill 1062 does not address a specific and present concern related to religious liberty in Arizona. I have not heard of one example in Arizona where a business owner's religious liberty has been violated.

The bill is broadly worded and could result in unintended and negative consequences.

After weighing all of the arguments, I vetoed Senate Bill 1062 moments ago.

To the supporters of the legislation, I want you to know that I understand that long-held norms about marriage and family are being challenged as never before.

Our society is undergoing many dramatic changes. However, I sincerely believe that Senate Bill 1062 has the potential to create more problems than it purports to solve.

It could divide Arizona in ways we cannot even imagine and no one would ever want.

Religious liberty is a core American and Arizona value, so is non-discrimination.
I mean, that's still a lot of pandering to the delicate fee-fees of homophobic jerkos who are not so much principled as they are insecure about their super-special relationships losing the shimmering, golden glow that only denying equality to same-sex couples conveys upon their gloriously gilded unions, but it's also pretty remarkable (depressingly) to see a Republican say straightforwardly there isn't even any evidence of the alleged discrimination used to justify bigoted legislation.

The dominoes, they are falling.

Open Wide...

Happy Birthday, Misty!

Every year, Misty gets a Barbie princess cake on her birthday, becase she's such a princess!

a Barbie cake in which the Barbie is wearing a pink gown and holding her hands in the air, with a paper party favor in one hand, to which I've added a dialogue bubble reading 'Happy Birthday, Misty!'

Happy Birthday to youuuuuuuu!
Happy Birthday to youuuuuuuu!
You're such a shrinking violet,
And a prim princess, too!


I love ya, lady. Here's to a fabulous birthday and a fantastic year! *mwah!*

Open Wide...

Open Thread


Hosted by a Shubunkin.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

What one skill do you wish you had but utterly lack?

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

Olivia the White Farm Cat curled up asleep on the arm of the loveseat with her paw on her head

Olivia Twist, in one of her favorite sleeping positions: Paw on Head.

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

The Wednesday Blogaround

This blogaround brought to you by sunshine.

Recommended Reading:

Aaminah: [Content Note: Racism; bullying] Toxicity: The True Story of Mainstream Feminism's Violent Gatekeepers

Shereen: [CN: Guns; misogynoir; classism] "Self-Defense" for Whom? The Not-So-Curious Case of Marissa Alexander

Andy: [CN: Homophobia] Michael Sam Zings Homophobic Lobbyist with Plan to Ban Gays from the NFL

BYP: Chicago's Goodman Theater to Honor Trayvon Martin with 10 Short Plays

Jill: [Video] Things Get Predictably Destroyed in the New Godzilla Trailer

One of the things I love about Trudy's blog Gradient Lair is that she regularly features images of black women whose style she loves. And one of the things I love about Trudy is that she includes fat women. Hers is a space in which I always feel safe. (P.S. I want that entire outfit!)

As you might have seen in yesterday's Open Thread, Flavia Dzodan, whom I admire a great deal and like with abundance, has disclosed that she has cancer. In typical fashion, she writes powerfully and beautifully about it here.

Leave your links and recommendations in comments...

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime

[Content Note: There is a strobe-light effect in this video.]



Blondie: "Heart of Glass"

Open Wide...

In the News

Here is some stuff in the news today!

[Content Note: Class warfare; civil rights violations] This one is from last month, but I hadn't seen it until Shaker NineOfCups sent it to me this morning: "Want to Predict the Future of Surveillance? Ask Poor Communities." Definitely a must-read.

In related news: "Rapid Improvements in Lidar Technology Could Have Surveillance Implications."

[CN: War on agency] The 7th US Circuit Court of Appeals has denied the University of Notre Dame's "request for immediate relief from complying with the Affordable Care Act's (ACA) contraception mandate, upholding a lower court's ruling." Good.

A coalition of "more than 40 health care, consumer, and addiction treatment groups is urging the Food and Drug Administration to revoke approval of the prescription drug Zohydro," a hydrocodone-based opioid analgesics which would be prescribed to treat chronic pain. The coalition writes: "In the midst of a severe drug epidemic fueled by overprescribing of opioids, the very last thing the country needs is a new, dangerous, high-dose opioid." Dr. Andrew Kolodny, president of the advocacy group Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing, was even more blunt: "It's a whopping dose of hydrocodone packed in an easy-to-crush capsule. It will kill people as soon as it's released." The drug company which makes Zohydro says that definitely won't happen. Okay! It is very difficult to balance patient needs and safety in a for-profit healthcare market.

"Radioactive water from Japan's Fukushima power plant reaches Canada." There is, according to scientists, no reason to panic however. All right I will try not to panic!

Something about Bitcoin? I don't know. This is why you should keep all your money in Ronpaulbuxxx.

[CN: Consent issues] People magazine has a convoluted new policy about mostly not publishing images of celebrities' kids. Welp, it's a start.

LOL! "Missouri Spelling Bee Runs out of Words Because Kids Are Too Awesome." Love.

New Jersey police officer Rafael Burgos is being treated for smoke inhalation after rescuing all the animals inside a pet store during a fire. This fucking guy! In a good way!

A new Shelter Pet Project campaign for Maddie's Fund, the Humane Society of the United States, and the Ad Council features simple videos of shelter dogs and cats appealing directly to viewers, in the hopes of changing perceptions about shelter pets. (I love these ads so much!) Josh Hurley of the Ad Council writes a little bit about the process of developing the campaign and shooting the ads here.

Open Wide...

Number of the Day

[Content Note: Misogyny.]

17%: The average percentage of women in crowd scenes in films.

With a mix of humor and statistics, Geena Davis challenged a room full of students and admirers at the College of St. Benedict on Tuesday night to consider not only how often women are portrayed in leading roles but also how many women appear in crowd scenes.

The average: 17 percent.

"That means that all the fictitious worlds that are created, the underseas kingdoms and the villages and planetary colonies are made up of only about 17 percent female presence. You think you'd almost have to go out of your way to leave out that many women," Davis said.
Mirthless laughter.

This is, not coincidentally, kind of what the US Congress looks like (18%), too.

[H/T to Shaker GoldFishy. Previous Geena Davis: "It's unusual in that it has two really wonderful parts for women."; Quote of the Day.]

Open Wide...

Safety for Survivors

[Content Note: Rape culture.]

Yesterday, Amanda Marcotte wrote a piece for Slate (DoNotLink used to avoid rewarding click-bait) in which she argued in defense of Cowlitz County, Washington, prosecutors who issued a material witness warrant for a 43-year-old woman who was refusing to cooperate in the case against her ex-boyfriend, who has been charged with "first-degree attempted rape, indecent liberties with forcible compulsion, first-degree kidnapping, and second-degree assault with sexual motivation" after he made her perform oral sex on another man to settle a debt. She spent one night in jail, to compel her to testify.

Writes Marcotte:

The sad, unavoidable truth is that we have to decide what's more important to us: putting abusive men in jail or letting their victims opt out of cooperating with the prosecution as they see fit. Always erring on the side of victim sensitivity means putting some very bad men back out on the streets, where they will likely attack someone else. If that's the price that you feel is worth paying, OK, but it's also understandable that prosecutors might try to do everything within their power to convict a guy who likes tying women to chairs and assaulting them.
I couldn't disagree more vehemently with this position. I genuinely understand why people want to compel victims to testify, but nope.

First and foremost: It is not any survivor's responsibility to stop a predator from raping. Predators are responsible for not raping—and tasking a survivor with the accountability for stopping a predator after zie's been victimized is no different than tasking potential victims with the accountability to prevent rape. That rapists hold the exclusive responsibility for rape is anti-rape advocacy 101.

Secondly: Forcing survivors to participate in prosecutions against their wills is revictimization and potentially a profound secondary trauma. As the local coverage of this story notes: "In this case, [using the material witness warrant] had the added irony of using a warrant to hold the woman against her will so she can help convict someone else of holding her against her will." This is reprehensible decision-making.

Third: It's contemptible that, across the nation, police departments systematically refuse to cooperate with victims, but now a victim is held by police for refusing to cooperate with them. So lots of people ostensibly tasked with protecting the community from predators and abusers routinely fail survivors with virtual impunity, but one survivor declines to assist them, and a warrant is issued for her to force her to engage. That's rich.

Which, of course, is to say nothing about the fact that women from marginalized classes may have all kinds of reasons to be reluctant to work with police and prosecutors, even above and beyond any potential reluctance to participate in the prosecution of one's own abuser.

Finally: The primary defense for holding this woman and compelling her to testify is that if she doesn't participate and her abuser walks, he'll harm more women. But if we're really concerned about preventing future assaults, then we have to foremostly make it safe for multiple survivors to report—and publicly revictimizing one survivor in this way stands to discourage multiple victims from reporting. That is bigger than even this one rapist.

So even if one's primary concern is prevention of future assaults, this policy still doesn't make any goddamn sense.

In fact, if one is concerned at all about successfully identifying and convicting predators, a policy that stands to scare victims into not reporting is pretty much the worst possible policy to support.

Safety for survivors. That must always be our priority.

[See also: Ana Mardoll.]

Open Wide...

Blog Note

It definitely helped my back taking yesterday afternoon off and forcing myself to just lie on my side EVEN THOUGH IT'S SOOOO BORING, so I'm going to do the same thing today. I'll be here a half day, or however long feels right, and then I'll take time to accommodate my garbage back. Just wanted to let y'all know what's up.

Open Wide...