Happy International Day of the Girl!

image of the International Day of the Girl Logo, featuring a lightbulb the filament of which is also an empowerment fist and the words: 'Day of the Girl: Innovate 2 Educate'

Today is also the second annual International Day of the Girl! This year's theme is Innovating for Girls' Education, and you can find a compilation of stories about UN Women's global work to promote innovation in education here.

UN Women Executive Director Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka released a statement marking this day, which connects access to education with prevention of violence against girls and women and announces "the roll-out today of a new initiative to prevent violence against girls. The unique curriculum, Voices against Violence, will be delivered by the World Association of Girl Guides and Girl Scouts among its 10 million members in 145 countries."
The curriculum was developed within a broader education and advocacy framework under WAGGGS' global campaign Stop the Violence; Speak Out for Girls Rights, and has been tested among 1500 members of the girl guiding movement in 25 countries. Already, those who participated in the pilot programme have measured and reported changes in the level of knowledge and understanding of gender issues, and engaged parents and community members in dialogues and actions.
Awesome.

[Content Note: Violence; misogyny; terrorism.]

Given that education is the theme of this years IDoTG, it seems appropriate to share this amazing video of Nobel Peace Prize nominee and Sakharov Prize winner Malala Yousafzai, the Pakistani schoolgirl who was shot by the Taliban for campaigning on behalf of girls' educational access, on The Daily Show earlier this week. [H/T to Jess.]

Jon Stewart: Welcome back. My guest tonight—she's an advocate for girls' access to education worldwide—is the youngest person ever to be nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize. Her new book is called I Am Malala: The Girl Who Stood Up for Education and Was Shot by the Taliban. Please welcome to the program Malala Yousafzai. [cheers and applause] Nice to see you. Thank you for being here.

Malala Yousafzai: Thank you so much. It's an honor for me.

Stewart: It is an honor for us . I know me.

Yousafzai: [laughs]

Stewart: This is— By the way, I—we talked a little bit before the show; nothing feels better than making you laugh. I will say that. I enjoyed that very much.

Yousafzai: [laughs uncomfortably] Thank you.

Stewart: Uh, I Am Malala, it, it, it—it's honestly humbling to meet you. You're sixteen: Where did your love for education come from?

Yousafzai: Um, we are human beings, and this is the part of our human nature, that we don't learn the importance of anything until it's snatched from our hands. And when—in Pakistan, when we were stopped from going to school, at that time, I realized that education is very important, and education is the power for women, and that's why the terrorists are afraid of education—they do not want women to get education, because then women would become more powerful. [cheers and applause]

Stewart: That's exactly—that's exactly right. When did the—when did the Taliban come to Swat Valley? Because, before then, you just describe it as, uh, a paradise of sorts.

Yousafzai: The Taliban came in 2004, but at that time, they were quite good—they did not show they're the terrorism and they did not blast any school at that time. But they started the real terrorism in 2007. They have blasted more than 400 schools in Swat. They have slaughtered people. And in the month of January 2009, they—they used to slaughter even two, three people every night, and they have flogged women. We have seen the barbaric situation of the 21st century, and we have seen, like, the, the, the cruelty, and we have seen harsh days in our life, and those are regarded as the darkest days of our life. So, it was—it was really hard for us at that time.

Stewart: You describe in the book, still, no matter what, they took the signs off of schools, they, uh, they went underground, but they continued in the face of— You spoke out publicly against the Taliban. What gave you the courage to continue this?

Yousafzai: You know, my father was a great encouragement for me, because he spoke of—he spoke out for women's rights; he spoke out for girls' education. And, at that time, I said that why shall I wait for someone else? Why shall I be looking to the government, to the army, that they would help us? Why don't I raise my voice? Why don't we speak up for our rights? The girls of Swat, they spoke up for their rights. I started writing diary; I spoke on every media channel that I could; and I raised my voice on every platform that I could. And I said: I need to tell the world what is happening in Swat. And I need to tell the world that Swat is suffering from terrorism, and we need to fight against terrorism.

Stewart: When did you realize the Taliban had made you a target?

Yousafzai: Um, when, uh, in 2012, um, we were— I was with my father, and someone came, and she told us that have you seen on Google net, if you search your name and the Taliban has threatened you, and I just could not believe it. I said no, it's not true—and even after the threat, when we saw it, I was not worried about myself that much; I was worried about my father, because we thought that the Taliban are not that much cruel that they would kill a child, 'cause I was 14 at that time. But then later on I used to, I like— I started thinking about that, and I used to think, to think that the Talib would come, and he would just kill me, but then I said: If he comes, what would you do, Malala? Um, then I would reply myself that: Malala, just take a shoe and hit him, but then I said— [laughter] But then I said: If you hit a Talib with your shoe, then there would be no difference between you and the Talib. You must not treat others that much with cruelty and that much harshly; you must fight others, but through peace, and through dialogue and through education. Then I said: I'll tell him how important education is, and that I even want education for your children as well. And I will tell him: That's what I want to tell you. Now do what you want. [she chuckles; cheers and applause]

Stewart: Let me ask you— you know, I know your father is backstage and he's very proud of you, but would he be mad if I adopted you? [laughter]

Yousafzai: [laughs]

Stewart: Because you sure are swell.
Education for all. Education for all.

Open Wide...

Happy National Coming Out Day!

image

Today is the 26th (!) annual National Coming Out Day! Twenty-six years ago today, half a million people marched on Washington for LGBT equality and Coming Out Day was born.

A lot has changed since then. And a lot hasn't. But what has changed, and what will change, is due to the brave men, women, and genderqueer folks who come out because they expect more than a closet. As long as we live in a deeply heterocentrist culture that privileges straightness, coming out will remain a radical act—and anyone who comes out is an activist and an advocate, sheerly by virtue of their public existence, because straight/cis people who know out members of the queer community are exponentially more likely to be political allies.

The privileging of straightness also means that coming out is not a single day in a life, but a never-ending process of assessing one's safety and balancing it against the need for disclosure. Coming out to family, coming out to old friends, coming out to new friends, coming out at school, coming out at every new job... A series of comings out necessitated by a culture that reflexively assigns straightness until an individual demands to be recognized otherwise, a culture that arbitrarily and unnecessarily attaches meaning, and difference, to sexual orientation.

There yet remain many places in the world, including lots of parts of the US, in which queer people do not feel safe coming out. As we mark Coming Out Day in this space, let us remember those people who have not come out for reasons of personal safety, or religious oppression, or out of a profound fear of familial or community rejection.

And let us celebrate coming out, and the people who build spaces where coming out and being out is safe.

I invite you to share your coming out stories here, as a road-map to the people who are beginning that journey, and an invitation to the party that awaits them when they arrive.

Open Wide...

Shutdown, Day Wev

Republicans still terrible. Government still shut down.

Senate Republicans are heading to the White House this morning to meet with President Obama, in the hopes of, I dunno, trying to find some way to get the dipshits in their party over in the House to agree to stop destroying the nation for two seconds. Good luck, everyone!

There is a House proposal, of sorts, on the table, which is garbage. This morning, the New York Times editors call it, politely, "an inadequate offer."

If House Republicans were reasonable, they would have raised both the debt ceiling and passed a clean continuing resolution to end the shutdown. That would have immediately produced a willingness on the part of President Obama and Senate Democrats to begin negotiations on the budget for the fiscal year that began Oct. 1.

For now, House leaders seem to have dropped their demand to tie the reopening of government to ending health care reform. But as they shift back to the longer-running dispute over spending, they still want to use the continuing shutdown as their weapon to extract more cuts from the budget without any revenue increases.

Each day the shutdown continues, the lack of services grows more acute. Republicans know that they are hurting those most dependent on government assistance (who tend to be Democratic constituents). To cite just one example, many states are about to run out of federal nutrition aid to the poor. Michigan, along with other states, is close to shutting down its Women, Infant and Children feeding program, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, school lunches, and food stamps

House leaders are still working on the details of their debt-ceiling proposal. But even Senate Republicans have grown weary of the House's confrontational tactics, and plan to include an end to the shutdown as part of any debt-ceiling bill that emerges from the House.

Asked whether any negotiations over the budget will take place if the government remains closed, the Senate majority leader, Harry Reid, on Thursday gave an answer that was firm and correct: "Not gonna happen."
Good. It would have been nice if the Democrats had called the Republicans' bluff at any point in the last 30 or so years before this point, before people were literally risking starvation because of the Republicans' indecent game-playing, but at least they're taking a stand now. Let's hope they keep standing.

Meanwhile, amidst the Republican radicals run amok, here's another article about Republicans who are agitated about the turn their party has taken, and all I can do is laugh mirthlessly in their general direction. This was always going to be the endgame of the contemptible strategies the GOP has been using to get elected for decades. Whoops. Whoops for America. Whoops for us all.

Open Wide...

Open Thread


Hosted by a ghost who had a little trouble with the scissors.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

What's the next item on your to-do list?

Could be a daily list of shit that's just gotta get done, your work task list, your next your life goal ... however big or small you want to interpret it.

Open Wide...

Check Out This Guy

Eleven-year-old Peyton Robertson of Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, just won the grand prize at the Discovery Education 3M Young Scientist Challenge by inventing a new kind of saltwater sandbag:

"Living in Florida, I'm keenly aware of hurricanes and saltwater flooding," [Robertson] told NBC News.

"Super-storm Sandy really got me concerned about how people can prepare for that damage from flooding. But today, the most common method of flood protection is sandbags. They are really heavy and difficult to transport and leave gaps in between the bags. So, I redesigned the bag," he explained.

Instead of sand, his bag is filled with a mixture of salt and an expandable polymer. When dry, it is lightweight, easy to move and easy to store. Once the bag is positioned, such as to create a barrier around a house, users hose it down with water. The polymer absorbs the water, swells and fills the volume of the bag.

"I use salt so they are heavier than any approaching seawater … but the twist is when you add salt to the bag it reduces the swelling of the polymer so you need to recalculate how much you put in," Robertson explained.

...The bags also have a novel interlocking mechanism that connects them at their midpoints in order to prevent gaps that floodwaters can penetrate.

Robertson tested the bags in the bathtub and a kiddie pool where they easily outperformed traditional sand-filled sandbags. He next hopes to test them "in a real hurricane situation because that is the only way to figure out what glitches or whatever might be in the solution."
Kids today. Get ON my lawn!

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

[Content Note: Fat hatred; body policing; homophobia; gay slur; bullying.]

As an openly gay writer, one of the questions I'm asked most often is, "Were you bullied growing up?" And the answer is yes, but it's never the answer they're looking for. In many ways I was lucky to have come of age in a liberal enclave where my sexuality was accepted if not embraced. Oh, sure, I've had the word "faggot" hurled at me — and the sad truth is, I'd be shocked if a gay man hadn't — but it was always secondary. The real source of my bullying was the extra weight I've carried since childhood. I can count on one hand the number of times I've been called a "faggot" to my face, but I couldn't tell you how often someone has made a dig about my weight.

Outside of anonymous internet comments, the gay slurs have stopped almost entirely. Remarks about my weight, however, are a depressing constant.

I share this not for sympathy but for context. It's an answer to the people who seem surprised when I explain that no, I was never really bullied for being gay, but instead got made fun of for being fat on a daily basis. They are open-minded progressives, and I appreciate their fixation on the way LGBT people are treated; obviously, I share their concern. But the treatment of overweight people is, for the most part, lost on them. And that's largely because so many of my allies and fellow gay men championing equality — compassionate, forward-thinking individuals — are the same people delicately suggesting I lose some weight.

What it comes down to is good intentions. Call someone a gay slur and you're homophobic. Use a racial slur and you're a racist. But when you wonder out loud why I can't just lose some weight, you're looking out for me. At least, that's the perception. The hurtful degradation becomes socially sanctioned, because being fat is considered to be innately wrong. The common understanding is that fatness is unhealthy and unnatural and always the fat person's fault, despite the fact that science does not agree with these assessments. And suddenly, otherwise good people — those who are proud to not have a bigoted bone in their bodies — feel no shame in condemning us fatties. It's not bigotry if we deserve it.
—Louis Peitzman, from his essay "It Gets Better, Unless You're Fat." Read the whole thing here.

[H/T to Shaker IndyM. Related Reading: Quote of the Day; Dan Savage: Please Stop; An Open Letter to My Fat Father, From His Fat, Trans Son.]

Open Wide...

LOL WHUT

Michael Kinsley, the New Republic writer last discussed in these pages after making an absolute arse of himself talking about same-sex marriage, has a terrific new column in which he actually posits this as a serious argument:

President Obama should give in. Yes, this mess is all the Republicans' fault. Yes, it's outrageous that they can hold the government hostage in order to reargue a law that's been voted on, signed, enacted, and upheld by the Supreme Court. Yes, it's a terrible precedent. Nevertheless, he should give in.

...The media will no doubt call Obama weak because he gave in. So let them. Sticks and stones. Meanwhile, will the Republicans really take the past couple of weeks as a precedent and push him around on every issue that comes up? Highly unlikely. They are already getting most of the blame. They surely don't look forward to trying to convince voters it was such a swell experience that they're going to put us through it again and again.
LOL FOREVER.

This, my friends, is a well-compensated political journalist arguing in a national publication that President Obama should give in to the Republicans, just this once, because it's "highly unlikely" that the Republicans would be emboldened by such a concession. In other words, this is a man paid a hell of a lot of money to write about US politics who evidently doesn't actually pay the slightest bit of attention to US politics.

I bet he complains bitterly about an uninformed electorate at dinner parties with other self-satisfied leftist journos who nod sagely and rinse away the taste of irony with beautiful wine.

See also: Scott Lemieux.

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

Zelda the Black and Tan Mutt sitting in a funny position on the couch, resting on one hip with her legs turned out to the side
"What?"

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime

[Content Note: Fake body-size bullying at beginning of video.]



Mr. T: "Treat Your Mother Right"

Open Wide...

House GOP Proposes to Avoid Default While Maintaining Shutdown

But basically they're just kicking the can down the road, in the hopes of forcing the White House to negotiate with them:

Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) announced Thursday that the House will move forward with a six-week debt limit extension after pitching the idea to his Republican conference during a closed-door meeting.

The plan would sustain the government shutdown -- now in its 10th day -- while temporarily averting a catastrophic debt default by authorizing continued borrowing through Nov. 22...

"What we're going to do is to offer the president, today, the ability to move a temporary increase in the debt ceiling," Boehner told reporters after the meeting, "and an agreement to go to conference on the budget for his willingness to sit down and discuss with us a way forward to reopen the government and to start to deal with America's pressing problems."

The legislation hasn't been finalized yet. It's expected to omit unrelated policy measures but may require an agreement to negotiate a longer-term solution, according to one source. And the U.S. would not be permitted to take extraordinary measures to borrow after Nov. 22. The country's borrowing authority is currently set to be exhausted next Thursday on Oct. 17.

"We're going to offer legislation that will offer a temporary increase in the debt ceiling," said Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (WA), the No. 4 House Republican. "That will allow us some time to continue this conversation."
Oh, there's a conversation? Ha ha news to me.
The more moderate House Republicans are baffled by the idea of sustaining the unpopular shutdown while temporarily extending the debt limit. But they're likely to contain their frustrations, yet again, and support leadership's latest move. Conservative members appeared uneasy with the plan but several of them voiced support for it.

President Barack Obama supports a longer debt limit extension but is open to a short-term hike as long as it doesn't have policy add-ons, and wants the government re-opened.

"While we are willing to look at any proposal Congress puts forward to end these manufactured crises, we will not allow a faction of the Republicans in the House to hold the economy hostage to its extraneous and extreme political demands," a White House official said. "Congress needs to pass a clean debt limit increase and a funding bill to reopen the government."
And stop trying to pass off bullshit half-measures as legit negotiations just so they can claim it's the President who refuses to negotiate.

Open Wide...

Fashion Police Brutality

[Content Note: Violence; misogyny; gender- and body policing.]

I used to really like Tim Gunn, the Project Runway mentor who seemingly has such a supportive way with the designers who compete on the show. But then, in 2011, he decided to publicly gender- and body police Hillary Clinton, because he doesn't like her fashion sense. And, okay, everyone fucks up, I get that, which doesn't mean giving someone a pass on shitty behavior, but I don't want to be forever defined by my worst moment, so I try not to do that to other people if they demonstrate having learned something and exhibit better sensitivity, because we're all on a path and life is not a fixed point etc., but apparently that was not just a bad moment and learning schmearning and Mr. Gunn says no-thank-you to expecting more of him because here we go again:

One person who is decidedly not a fan of [Miley Cyrus'] new look? Tim Gunn!

In Touch caught up with the 60-year-old fashion icon at the Nespresso Pop-up Shop, where he revealed that he's been "horrified" by the 20-year-old's recent fashion choices lately.

So what advice would Tim — who has lent his keen fashion eye to countless aspiring fashion designers on Project Runway — say to Miley? Nothing, apparently!

"I don't think I would say anything to her," he told In Touch. "I think I would haul off and give her a great big bitch slap. She needs to be shocked into listening."
I'm not going to get into a whole thing about Miley Cyrus, in which I could spend as much time on criticisms of her cultural appropriation as I could defending her from slut-shaming, because she is a complex human being in a profoundly fucked-up industry inside an already fucked-up culture, and there is shit she does (and has done) that warrants legitimate criticism and shit that is done to her which warrants legitimate criticism, too.

And the reason I'm not getting into all that is because it's not relevant (except insomuch as public slut-shaming provides the space in which shit like this can seem okay). Nothing that this 20-year-old has done, including and especially wearing clothes or costumes that one doesn't consider fashionable, warrants publicly talking about how she needs to be "bitch-slapped."

No less to be "bitch-slapped" by a man because she is expressing her own creative agency and failing to conform to that man's arbitrary fashion ideals.

Tim Gunn, is that really the message you want to send to young women—conform or be violently abused?

Oh, I know, I know—I'm the Most Humorless Feminist in all of Nofunnington and I don't understand that Tim Gunn was just joking and being catty-misogynist in that "fun" way that some women and gay men think is hilarious and acceptable as if it exists in a vacuum, in total isolation from the terrifying statistics on violence against women.

As if this isn't being disgorged into a culture in which female people aren't already policed and shamed and ostracized and bullied and often violently abused for failing to conform to gendered expectations, including an impossible beauty standard; a culture in which women with deviant personal expression are marginalized, mocked, denied jobs, harmed; a culture in which female people's failure to show deference to men, failure to listen, is frequently met with brutality.

What a great joke.

This is not okay. This is not okay.

teaspoon icon Tim Gunn is on Twitter, if you'd like to ask him to stop using "bad fashion" as an excuse for casually engaging in violent misogyny.

Open Wide...

Please Support Shakesville

teaspoon icon This is, for those who have requested it, your bi-monthly reminder to donate to Shakesville and an important fundraiser to keep Shakesville going.

If you have appreciated being able to tune into Shakesville for coverage of the shutdown, for the healthcare roll-out, for getting distilled news about politics or other news, for recaps of your favorite show, or for whatever else you appreciate at Shakesville, whether it's the moderation, the community in Open Threads, Film Corner, video transcripts, the blogarounds, or anything else, please remember that Shakesville is run exclusively on donations. I would certainly appreciate your support, if you can afford to chip in. The donation link is in the sidebar to the right. Or click here.

[Further explanation of fundraising is here. Please note that I don't want anyone to feel obliged to contribute financially, especially if money is tight. Aside from valuing feminist work, the other goal of fundraising is so Iain and I don't have to struggle on behalf of the blog, and I don't want anyone else to struggle themselves in exchange. There is a big enough readership that neither should have to happen.]

Open Wide...

In the News

Here is some stuff in the news today! (Your daily shutdown thread is here.)

Climate scientists predict that large parts of the world will shift to a new climate by the middle of the century, which "could force profound changes on nature and society."

[Content Note: Gun violence; misogyny] Malala Yousafzai, the Pakistani schoolgirl who was shot by the Taliban for campaigning on behalf of girls' educational access, has been awarded the European Parliament's Sakharov Prize for free speech.

ProPublica has launched #ProjectIntern, in which their paid intern Casey McDermott will "travel the country and document stories of the emerging intern economy."

[CN: Addiction] Last month, the first known US appearance of the Russian drug krokodil, a cheap alternative to heroin, was reported in Arizona. And now it's made an appearance in suburban Chicago. This shit is horrible, and I want to caution you that if you do any reading about it, you may stumble across disturbing images of what the drug does to users' bodies.

"I actually won't tell you which public editor it was but one of the public editors of the New York Times told me off the record after my debate that their biggest nightmare was his column every week."—Joe Scarborough. Seriously? The paper that runs David Brooks and Maureen Dowd thinks Paul Krugman is their biggest nightmare?! Welp.

[CN: Rape culture; misogyny] Robin Thicke, the douchebag who sings the execrable rape culture anthem "Blurred Lines," says don't blame him for twerking with Miley Cyrus: "That's all on her. ...Listen, I'm the twerkee. I'm twerked upon." He is the biggest dirtbag. [Please note that "twerking" and Miley Cyrus are not on-topic. The subject is Robin Thicke being a gross asshat.]

Do you think you can solve a 1,200-year-old Pictish puzzle? Well, give it a try!

Artist Elaine Amyot is my aunt, and this is a very nice story about her!

Open Wide...

This Is Actually a Story About Guns, Not Phones

[Content Note: Guns; shooting; violence.]

I am the multitasker to end all multitasking—but one thing I will not do is look at my phone while I am driving, or while I am crossing the street. Every near-miss traffic accident I've had in the past few years has been with someone looking at or talking on a mobile phone while driving. So I am fully on-board with awareness-raising around the dangers of being absorbed with mobile devices.

But I have a real problem with this story being used as an opening salvo to an SFGate article on that subject:

A man standing on a crowded Muni train pulls out a .45-caliber pistol.

He raises the gun, pointing it across the aisle, before tucking it back against his side. He draws it out several more times, once using the hand holding the gun to wipe his nose. Dozens of passengers stand and sit just feet away - but none reacts.

Their eyes, focused on smartphones and tablets, don't lift until the gunman fires a bullet into the back of a San Francisco State student getting off the train.

Investigators say this scene was captured by a Muni camera on Sept. 23, the night Nikhom Thephakaysone, 30, allegedly killed 20-year-old Justin Valdez in an apparently random encounter.

For police and prosecutors, the details of the case were troubling - they believe the suspect had been out "hunting" for a stranger to kill - but so too was the train passengers' collective inattention to imminent danger.

"These weren't concealed movements - the gun is very clear," said District Attorney George Gascón. "These people are in very close proximity with him, and nobody sees this. They're just so engrossed, texting and reading and whatnot. They're completely oblivious of their surroundings."
So, long before mobile devices were in common use, I commuted on the Chicago El train for 10 years. Back then, in the age of the dinosaurs, commuters weren't chit-chatting and engaging with one another and paying careful attention to their surroundings: They pretty much had their noses in books and newspapers and magazines, or giant laptops precariously balanced across their knees, composing emails they would definitely send once their techno-bricks were plugged back into a wall. People being absorbed by whatever on the train isn't a new thing.

And neither is people pretending to be absorbed by something in their hands to avoid getting involved in some sort of trouble on the train.

I'm not saying that the passengers in the above scenario weren't so genuinely absorbed in their devices that they didn't know what was going on near them. I have no idea. But what I do know is that there are a lot of people on public transportation (or anywhere) who react to the potential for some sort of violence, or any kind of uncomfortable or inappropriate behavior, or someone exhibiting signs of a medical emergency, by pretending they don't see it.

Maybe because they don't know what to do. Maybe because they don't want to get involved. Maybe because they're assholes. Maybe because they're scared.

Lots of women use headphones or mobile devices or books or whatever to try to avoid getting harassed, by making themselves look unavailable for approach. And lots of those women will look, to a casual observer, like they're totally engrossed in whatever while they're actually acutely aware of their surroundings. It's a survival skill.

So, yes, maybe the passengers on that train didn't even notice that there was a man with a gun in their midst. Or maybe they (or some of them) noticed—and were trying their best not to call attention to themselves so that the man with a gun wouldn't hurt them.

Because, really, what were they supposed to do, even if they noticed? What is an average person who gets on public transportation just hoping to get from A to B going to do when someone pulls out a gun? Charge him and try to wrestle the gun away? Scream and cause a scene where someone will almost certainly get hurt? Stare at their mobile and hope that the man with the gun gets off at the next stop, or hope that they can quietly get off at the next stop and phone police without alerting the man with the gun?

What are the great options available to the terrible people looking at their phones, standing in a closed space with a gunman?

Like I said, I'm all for awareness-raising about the dangers of absorption in mobile devices, but this is not a relevant example. This isn't a story about modern technology. This is a story about guns—and a society with ever more of them brought into public spaces by people intent on using them.

Open Wide...

So, This Is Happening

As you may recall, the Attorney General of Indiana, where I live, is terrible. His extreme conservative politics are just unfathomably cruel, and his latest maneuver is breathtaking in its heinous audacity: Indiana Sues to Prevent Its Own Residents from Receiving Obamacare's Insurance Subsidies.

This week, Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller filed a lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) challenging its authority to fund Obamacare's insurance subsidies for individuals and enacting penalties against public employers (such as state and local governments) that don't meet the health law's minimum worker coverage requirement. If successful, the challenge would prevent Americans from receiving the government assistance that makes Obamacare's insurance marketplace plans affordable in the first place.

Zoeller claims that the health law doesn't permit people living in the 36 states that have refused to set up their own Obamacare marketplaces — including Indiana — to qualify for federal insurance subsidies. He also says that local government employers which don't meet Obamacare's requirements cannot be penalized under the law to help fund those subsidies.

..."The fact that many citizens lack health insurance is an issue for policymakers, and my office takes no position regarding the congressional debate over funding the ACA. I never complain when private plaintiffs file lawsuits to challenge the state authority that my office defends; but now our role is reversed and Indiana has initiated this lawsuit asking the court whether the IRS has exceeded its federal taxing authority over state governments," said Zoeller in a statement. "This respectful challenge is an appropriate role for the Office of the Attorney General to vigorously assert the ability of the State and its political subdivisions to manage their workforces in our American system of federalism."

...If the lawsuit is successful, it would amount to a massive premium hike for Americans who are required to procure insurance coverage under the health law — and could fundamentally [undermine] Obamacare's goal of extending affordable health coverage to the uninsured.
Naturally, Zoeller and his conservative compatriots do not support single-payer, government-sponsored, universal healthcare, either. So his position is, in effect: Sucks to be you if you don't have insurance.

Meanwhile, I and every other Indiana taxpayer are paying to make sure Mr. Zoeller has access to healthcare.

Open Wide...

Shutdown, Continued

Republicans still terrible. Government still shut down.

While Congressional Republicans and conservative pundits make the cable news show circuit to declare the shutdown "no big deal," nearly a million people are not getting paid, everything from domestic violence shelters to scientific research facilities are struggling without the federal funding on which they depend, needy schools are running out of money, food stamp recipients are bracing for automatic cuts, thousands of national park employees are stranded without work or pay, military families are waiting for death benefits, and the list could go on and and on and on.

The Republican shitheels who keep yukking it up about how this shutdown is "no big deal," just a bit of political theater with no real consequences, are liars and dirtbags. The shutdown is "no big deal" to them.

But it is a very big deal to a lot of other folks.

Open Wide...

Open Thread


Hosted by Boo Berry.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

What is your earliest memory?

Mine is crawling behind my parents' living room sofa, trying to chase down one of their two white, long-haired cats. It's just the briefest of recollections, a feeling of the thrill of being in this strange little space where no one could follow, in playful pursuit of my feline pal.

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

"I'm a 'transparency advocate.' I feel that the public cannot decide what actions and policies are or are not justified if they don't even know the most rudimentary details about them and their effects."—Whistleblower Chelsea Manning, clarifying her motivation in releasing classified documents, an act for which she is now incarcerated. Emphasis original. Her full statement is here.

Open Wide...