The Blacklist

image of actor James Spader being held in federal custody with a wry grin on his face

[Content Note: Violence. Spoilers for the pilot episode of The Blacklist.]

So, last night, I watched the premiere of The Blacklist, because James Spader. Who, for the record, is now sporting what is probably the exact opposite haircut of his glorious mullet, if haircuts can be said to have opposites.

Anyway.

I requested that Deeky watch it with me, because why wouldn't I, and so we watched it together and had a terrific text conversation about it, an excerpt from which I will share with you now:

Deeks: James Spader is Keyser Söze!

Liss: Hells yeah he is.

Deeks: I liked The Blacklist better when it was called Silence of the Lambs.

Liss: LOL! That's exactly what I said to Iain after we saw the preview!

Deeks: Silence of the Lambs + Homeland =The Blacklist.

Liss: The other thing I said to Iain after the preview was, "He's her dad." I eagerly await confirmation of this prediction!

Deeks: He might be! Probably!

Liss: [quoting line from show] "You look much less Baltimore." LOL!

Deeks: Right?!

Liss: [quoting line from show] "I noticed how you stroke it." LOL FOREVER!!!!!!! Yeah, well, fuck YOU, buddy! I noticed how YOU stroke it!

Deeks: LOLOLOL!!!

Liss: Your neck is fucked, son!

Deeks: That carpet is ruined.

Liss: [quoting line from show] "He's fascinated with the things." This bozo's like a regular magpie, except with chemical weapons instead of shiny things!

Deeks: LOLOLOL this show.

Liss: You know how you hide your Bourne Box under wall-to-wall carpeting for easy access?

Deeks: Totally. So. Randy Roddington or whoever his name is had Clarice's husband stabbed so he'd bleed and ruin the carpet and she'd tear it up and notice the floor was cut and get out the crowbar and pull apart the floor and find his stash box? That seems a rather optimistic plan, really.

Liss: LOLOLOL!!! He's a SUPERGENIUS! Also: I love James Spader. This show is terrible, but I will totally watch it, lol.

And that about sums it up. What—you have no idea what the show is about from our totally trenchant conversation?! Huh.

Okay, so the show is about a SUPERGENIUS criminal played by James Spader, who, if you're not familiar with his work, is the philosopher's Nicolas Cage. (That makes almost TOO MUCH sense, when you really think about it.) He looks like the love child of John Lithgow and Susan Sarandon (tell me I'm wrong!), and he is a fine actor and a very witty person in real life whose rare appearances on late night chat shows are always delightful. All of which is relevant to this post, I SWEAR, because it makes him the perfect person to play the SUPERGENIUS criminal with devastatingly witty banter who is definitely #1 on the FBI's Most Wanted list for LEAKING IMPORTANT INFO (good one, NBC!) and walks his ass into FBI headquarters and gives himself up so he can help the feckless US government find only slightly less supergeniusy criminals than himself that the incompetent feds don't even know exist!

But he will only speak to Agent Elizabeth Keen! Which is SO WEIRD because it's her first day on the job and he knows EVERYTHING ABOUT HER whooooaaa he is creepy but also charming! (Aren't all SUPERGENIUSES?)

In the pilot, they stop a Serbian bomber together, of course they do, but WAS IT ALL A SET-UP to reveal to her in the most convoluted way possible that her husband is maybe a SUPERSPY?!

Okay. Thus ends the sarcastic portion of the post. Now I want to say, with all seriousness, that James Spader is really great in a show that, in all honesty, is probably beneath him, but I'm totally willing to give it a few weeks. Also? There is a scene in which Agent Keen's husband (before he's under suspicion of nefarious activity!) is held and tortured by the would-be bomber, right in front of her, and, while I never like the "put the significant other of a law enforcement person in peril to manipulate them" trope, because it is both overdone and gross, it was pleasantly jarring to see a husband in that position. So props to The Blacklist for turning a highly gendered trope on its head by casting a female lead.

There is a distinct dearth of other important female characters, though. And Agent Keen, played well by the lovely Megan Boone, is simultaneously written as a Damsel in Distress and an Exceptional Woman, so she is bearing the weight of a lot of Yawnworthy Lady Narratives all on her own. Still, there seems to be some interest in fleshing her into a fully three-dimensional character at some point, and, protip to the writers, that's always easier when there are other female characters around, so your female lead doesn't function as an Avatar for All Womanhood.

It was also great to see the wonderful Harry Lennix in the show, whom many of us will know from The Matrix, but he, too, is a pretty lonely representative for people of color. That will also need to change, if the show is to become something more than it is now.

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Dudley the Greyhound from above, lying on the couch on his back, with his legs up in the air in all different directions

This dog. He is such a character.

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime



Talk Talk: "It's My Life"

Open Wide...

In the News

Here is some stuff in the news today!

[Content Note: Violence; terrorism] The siege at Nairobi's Westgate Mall is reportedly over, although there are sporadic reports of gunfire. (Which may be authorities shooting open locked doors, as after the Navy Yard shooting.] The Guardian has live updates here.

[CN: Guns; violence] Four men have been arrested in connection with the mass shooting in Chicago over the weekend.

[CN: War] UN chemical weapons inspectors are expected to return to Syria tomorrow to "investigate alleged chemical weapons attacks at Khan al-Assal, Sheikh Maqsoud and Saraqeb."

[CN: Marriage inequality] A new study has found that people with cancer who are married have better health outcomes. My primary response to this finding is that it seems like a good idea then to let everyone who wants to get married, get married! I'm looking at YOU, homophobes!

[CN: Ciscentrism; gender essentialism] Another new study has found that women "smell their competition." Ha ha sure. "Just a whiff of a woman close to ovulation is enough to stimulate another woman's testosterone levels, along with her desire to compete. Competition among women may be, in large part, nose-driven, as a new study finds that the scent of a woman close to ovulation triggers a testosterone boost in the smelling female." THE SMELLING FEMALE! LOL FOREVER.

Indian Health Services will now "provide emergency contraception without a consultation or prescription at its federally-operated facilities. This is a victory for reproductive health advocates who have worked to expand Native American women's access to Plan B for years." Great news!

The Guttmacher Institute, a genuine national treasure, has done two new policy analyses examining the harm done by the Hyde and Helms amendments. Such important information. Share share share!

Ellen Pompeo, who stars on Grey's Anatomy, of which I've never seen an episode but I know a lot of people love it so much, observes that the Emmys were white as hell: "I didn't see any diversity in the Emmys at all. The Emmys felt so dated to me. ...That dance number was embarrassing. Did you see one person of color in that dance number?"

Do you want a 30th anniversary of Goonies Lego set? Then you'd better weigh in! "TAKE MY MONEY!" is my recommended missive to Lego.

Open Wide...

We Signed The Invitations With Our Most Contempty Ink

[Content Note: Bullying, Ableism, Misogyny] 

Via Skepchick, a UK charity called Entangled Bank Events is hosting a "major science talk" in mid-November with the boast that "It’s never been done before in a venue of this scale." Astute readers will notice that the five headline speakers (Bill Bailey, Richard Fortey, Richard Dawkins, Richard Wiseman, and Quentin Cooper) are all men.

In the helpful FAQ, which includes such questions as "Is the event suitable for children?" and "Is the event accessible to wheelchair users?" and "Are there any opportunities for volunteers?" there originally was also the following question-and-answer (link courtesy of Google cache):

I am a fanatical, misandristic ‘feminist’. May I drone on about the lack of women in the line-up and despatch abusive, bigoted, mis-spelt, ungrammatical missives to the organisers and presenters?

No. Please save your talents for Twitter and Facebook, that is what they are for.

We’re actually very disappointed that none of our female invitees accepted, but that is just how it was. As scientists we have no choice but to accept reality. Wanting something to be otherwise does not make it so.
Apparently enough people pointed out that this wasn't particularly cute such that Entangled Bank Events got nervous and deleted the whole question-and-answer, and then enough people pointed out that the internet doesn't work that way such that Entangled Bank Events decided to clarify with this non-pology:
Why are there no women on the panel?

We tried. We failed. The event was set up at short notice and as it happened, of all the excellent people we approached the only ones available on the day were men. We knew this wasn’t ideal and questions would be asked, so we tried to make a joke about it.

We tried. We failed. Should have been spotted by us, but as soon as our attention was drawn to it – via Twitter – we removed it. That only added to the confusion as some people saw the reactions without always knowing what was being reacted to.

So, sorry. It’s not through lack of effort the line-up is wide-ranging in the nature of their brilliance but entirely mono-gendered, but it is our fault the attempt at levity about it fell flat. And we do appreciate the efforts of all those who drew our attention to the error.
Oh, if only the lady-internets weren't so humorless!

The thing that makes me laugh the most bitterly about all this is that an event which is ostensibly supposed to be about science and skepticism and understanding things is trying to deflect criticize by seriously claiming ("As scientists we have no choice but to accept reality. Wanting something to be otherwise does not make it so.") that scientists are helpless in the face of magical forces they cannot hope to comprehend, and that they are utterly unable to effect a change in the world, nor can they study and understand the causes of things in order to alter that which is into that which is desired. Science! It's apparently just like a straw-religion where the only action available to its followers is to cower in terror at the harsh immutability of a cruel, unchangeable reality.

The thing that makes me saddest about all this is that the (understandable) attention on this shitwipe of a "joke" (and note that "it was only a joke!" is the rallying call of all bullies everywhere) means that we necessarily have to spend less attention on asking genuinely probing questions about how the event miraculously ended up with only male speakers. Questions like "How many women did you invite to this event?" and "Did you ask the women who turned you down why they wouldn't attend or did you just assume there was a calendar conflict?" and "Was your pool of available lady speakers narrowed by one or more male speakers maintaining a blacklist against specific- and/or feminist- lady skeptics?"

The thing that makes me the angriest about this is that lady science-skeptic-atheist speakers are not stupid. There is no way, no plausible way, that an organization which would write the above "joke" and subsequent non-pology just picked up its misogynist coat of many colors after all the awesome lady invitees turned down their rainbow-scented invitations with outpourings of regret and much fist-shaking at their cluttered calendars. I will bet my hat that the invitations were just as whiffy with woman-hating as their FAQ.

And I will further bet my best shoes that the invitations in no way addressed the kinds of things which lady speakers tend to care about, like "Also, here is our anti-harassment policy" or "Though you will be sharing a stage with Richard Dawkins, we promise not to let him vent racism and sexism at you" or "Seriously, we are going to do our best to make sure Richard Dawkins doesn't start a grudge campaign against you". You know, the sorts of things that lady speakers might genuinely want to know about in advance when trying to decide whether to make room on their calendars for a scaled venue of bigness.

But this leads me to a larger point: Let's presupposed that Entangled Bank Events asked hundreds of lady speakers to their event, and asked in the nicest possible way with gift baskets of kittens and a 50-page paper on all the ways that Entangled Bank Events will make sure that the lady speakers have only a lovely time and aren't in any way harassed or harmed or heckled by their fellow speakers or their fellow speakers' fans. And let's presuppose that all those lady speakers still turned the event down, not because Entangled Bank Events wrote their invitations wrong or failed to anticipate basic needs. The onus would still be on Entangled Bank Events to ask themselves (and the lady speakers) why that is, and to then fix those issues.

Even if it's nothing more than a simple calendar conflict (HA HA NO), and somehow some of the biggest male names in science-skepticism-atheism were free, but absolutely none of the lady names in etc. etc. were free, then that's still a problem that Entangled Bank Events needs to seriously address as opposed to flinging their hands in the air and saying OH WELL in a sing-songy voice. Because diversity in your convention speakers is more than just a nice-to-have thing, up there with getting a caterer who offers the really snazzy double chocolate chunk cookies in addition to the crumbly sugar ones. Diversity in your "all proceeds go to charities and to scientific research and education" is kind of important in the sense that you're overlooking huge portions of humanity with your supposedly charitable outreach.

And overlooking huge portions of humanity is in itself is bad enough. But doing it while painting people who might object as hateful and mentally ill merely for objecting to their own exclusion is bullying, plain and simple.

Open Wide...

Today in US Politics

Breaking News: All the nothing for which any taxpayer could ever hope is still getting done!

Democratic Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, chair of the Democratic National Committee, penned an op-ed detailing the dynamic that is currently crushing all hope of progress, or even meaningful action of any kind, in DC:

The civil war that has been raging within the Republican Party is over. And now that the House has voted to shut down the government unless Obamacare is defunded, it's official: The Tea Party has won — the far right is calling the shots.

This extreme faction and its captives in the GOP are so focused on undermining President Barack Obama and his plans to boost the economy and improve access to health care for all Americans that they're willing to drive the nation over the cliff. The only question now is what car these legislators will use: Will they cause a government shutdown, force the U.S. to default on its obligations, or both?

This is the desperate, reckless, path the Tea Party has chosen in its attempt to defund Obamacare, a goal they've decided to pursue even if it puts the financial stability of the United States in jeopardy.
The Party of No. No, people should not have access to affordable healthcare. No, people should not get food stamps. No, the richest people in the richest nation should not have to pay a penny more in taxes. No, higher education should not be more affordable. No, people should not be allowed to control their own reproduction. No, the duly elected President and the duly elected Senate majority should not have any say in the nation's direction. No. Nope. No.

The only direction in which the Republican Party is willing to move is backwards.

I don't know what the fuck country the members of this party are living in, but lots of people in the citizenry they're ostensibly meant to represent aren't doing well. Even the people who can afford to meet their own basic needs, who might even have some money left over after paying the bills, who are living within their means, are more likely than not a couple paychecks away from catastrophe, because not a lot of people Gen X and younger have any kind of meaningful savings. And if we did, it probably got raided during the recession for survival. All the shaming in the world about allegedly reckless spending doesn't change the fact that wage stagnation combined with the increased costs of modern life means that even the people who have the privilege of making a go of it despite outsourcing, unemployment, and the speed-up don't have the same quality of life, especially around the security of their lives, that the privileged folks in previous generations did.

People are insecure and overworked and underpaid and unhappy. That's not because they're entitled and greedy. It's because the economy is totally out of whack in favor of the richest few, leaving far too little for the rest of us.

And it certainly isn't because our government is doing too much for us.

Open Wide...

And the Asshole Award Goes To...

[CN: Intersectional classism and sexism]

So Will Ferrell closed the Emmys Saturday night in a truly amazing way. And when I say "amazing," unfortunately I do not mean "an amazingly witty and satiric act." I mean "an amazingly shitty snicker-fest at the lives of people less privileged than Will Ferrell":

You stay classy, Will Ferrell. The funnyman -- and dad of three! -- took to the stage to close out the Emmys on Sunday, Sept. 22, and brought out the biggest laughs of the night from the audience by trekking onstage in nothing but an old T-shirt, shorts and sandals.

"It is indeed an honor to be presenting the last two awards of the evening: best comedy series and best drama series," he began his speech as his three sons with wife Viveca Paulin -- Magnus, 9, Mattias, 6, and Axel, 3 -- stood by dad in soccer uniforms and sneakers...

Ferrell, 46, jokingly explained that Helen Mirren and Maggie Smith had dropped out of their presenting duties "literally 45 minutes ago" and the actor had to bring the kids along because he "couldn't find child care, OK?"

"We had a soccer game, there was a neighbor's birthday party, a nut allergy," he listed off. "I didn't have time to do my hair! It doesn't matter, it's great to be here."

Wow, that is certainly a hilarious routine, Mr. Ferrell! No doubt based on the many times you have been afraid for your job because you couldn't get child care! Because you knew that if you showed up less-than-perfectly groomed, your boss might chide you for being "unprofessional"! Because even if you can bring your kids to work, you know that you'll be judged "unfocused" for it! And if you're super-duper lucky, you'll be the subject of pitying/disapproving remarks about how you really shouldn't have even had those children if you can't magically provide for them without it interfering with your availability to work! How irresponsible of you.

Oh, no, WAIT. Your routine is definitely not based on those experiences. Because you are pretty completely insulated from them based on your class and gender! HOW NEAT FOR YOU!

Honestly, I can think of about a million ways for Ferrell to do his patented "I fuck up in increasingly exaggerated ways" routine without inviting his audience to laugh at the (mostly female) working people who have to bring their kids to work. The people who might lose their jobs over this. It's particularly gross because Ferrell's usual punchline is the bumbling incompetence of whatever character he's playing. But the perception of incompetence isn't funny for women who know that they are granted far less freedom to fail than their male peers. Those woman understand that bringing children to work will heighten the perception that they are less smart, less capable. Childcare is work that women are supposed to do effortlessly and invisibly; should the kids have the audacity to behave like....well, kids... then the woman has failed in that "simple" task.

Let me be clear: if people who actually have the experiences Ferrell mimicked were able to identify with him, and laugh along with this routine, then GREAT. The fact remains that there was huge privilege gulf separating Ferrell from the subjects of his comedy, and his routine showed no awareness of that. As Liss said to me in a private communication (shared with her permission):

And of course the audience, none of whom themselves want for childcare, roared with laughter. Which is to say nothing of an audience of people in hugely expensive and often borrowed clothes selected by people who get paid to dress them laughing at the idea of not having "the right" hair and wardrobe for a professional event, when not being able to afford professional clothes and styling for interviews is a Real Thing in the World. Especially for abused women who seek refuge in shelters with nothing but the clothes on their backs.

Yes. Appropriating the economic anxieties of working women as TEH FUNNY to further your own profitable and secure career? That is some real French Revolution shit right there.

Open Wide...

Open Thread


Hosted by a milk bottle toss game.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

What is your favorite flowering plant?

As always, "none" is an acceptable answer, if you have allergies or preferences that make flowering plants Not Your Thing.

Open Wide...

Whooooooooooops Your Math

I am not a fervent cheerleader of Obamacare (because I am not a fan of corporate hand-outs to insurance companies who try to maximize profits and will happily compromise the health of their customers to do so, and because I want SOCIALIZED HEALTHCARE FOR EVERYONE IN THE US LIKE YESTERDAY), but I have nothing but contempt for the legions of mendacious dipshits who are trying to discredit Obamacare based on cost alarmism. To wit:

An article published by Forbes claiming that Obamacare will increase health care costs by $7,450 for a typical family of four is spreading like wildfire across the internet, but causing eye rolls from economists across the country.

The estimate by author Chris Conover, an adjunct scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, comes from a Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) report, which projects that national health care spending will increase once the uninsured begin enrolling in the law's health care exchanges.

...One economist interviewed by ThinkProgress, the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities' Paul Van de Water, described this calculation as one of the stupidest things he's read in a long time...
LOL! Please click through to find out exactly why it's so stupid. I won't spoil the fun for you!

Open Wide...

Come On, Hillary. YES OR NO!

Paul Steinhauser at CNN: How long can Hillary Clinton wait?

I am relieved the article at least includes quotes from people who say, without qualification, that Hillary Clinton can take all the time she wants and needs to make her decision about whether to run for president again.

But fuck. This shit is old.

I understand how politics work. There are people (men) who want to run if Hillary isn't running, who don't want to put the time and energy and money into exploratory committees if Hillary Clinton is going to run. So they'd like an answer.

But tough shit. It's not her fault, in fact it the complete opposite, that Hillary Clinton has earned, earned, the luxury of being able to take her time making her decision.

And it serves her interests to delay her announcement, if she indeed decides to run. She shouldn't be hectored in making any decisions and/or announcements that don't serve her own best interests, and her own best chances, because it's inconvenient for other people (men) in her party.

This isn't even about Hillary Clinton, really. At least not just about her. It's about narratives, and about where women stand in the Democratic Party.

Grumpy Feminist is grumpy.

Open Wide...

Blog Note

Yep, Disqus is being wonky and some comments aren't showing up, or are disappearing and reappearing. Hopefully it will be resolved soon. My apologies for the inconvenience.

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

"Conservatives seem, in particular, to believe that freedom's just another word for not enough to eat."—Paul Krugman, in a must-read column on the Republicans' war on food stamps.

Let them eat bootstraps!

Open Wide...

The Monday Blogaround

This blogaround brought to you by potatoes.

Recommended Reading:

Minna: African Women Are Blazing a Feminist Trail

Nadia: Women Stand Up and Get Arrested for Immigration Reform [Content Note: The post at this link contains discussion of racism and misogyny.]

Angry Asian Man: Sikh Columbia University Professor Attacked in Hate Crime [Content Note: The post at this link contains discussion of racism, religious intolerance, and violence.]

Katie: The Whitewashing of the Environmental Movement [Content Note: The post at this link contains discussion of racism and institutional harm.]

Flavia: Professor Feminism (aka Hugø $chwyz3r) Is Back at It [Content Note: The post at this link contains discussion of abuse, harassment, racism, and misogyny.]

BYP: Grace Jones to Write Book About Her Life

And finally! Trudy has compiled a bunch of her pieces on Beauty Politics in one place. Go check 'em out!

Leave your links and recommendations in comments...

Open Wide...

In Other TV News...


[Please note that this thread will almost certainly contain spoilers from the final season and/or episode of Dexter.]

Open Wide...

Breaking Bad Recap and Open Thread

[Content Note: Descriptions of violence; major spoilers for Breaking Bad.]

image of Walt (Bryan Cranston) standing next to a propane truck in the snow
Mr. Lambert, I presume?

At the end of the previous episode, Walt the Worst had disappeared into the van of Saul's guy who whisks terrible people away into obscurity. When we pick back up, we discover that Mr. Disappear People, aka Ed, is being played by Robert Forster, which is PERFECT CASTING obviously, and he is also in the process of disappearing Saul. Saul joins Walt in the basement hideout of Ed's vacuum repair shop, where Walt has been secreted away for several days already, and he is losing it big time.

Walt, as fuckbrained as ever, is scribbling his plans to have the Swastika-necks murdered, and wants Saul to give him the name of a hitman. Saul just looks at him incredulously, as Walt doesn't seem to be grasping the whole "you are out of commission as a kingpin now" part of being disappeared. Walt screams at Saul, because he is the worst, and Saul tells him if he really cares about his family, he'll just turn himself in and save them from their fate, which will definitely be worse than if he'd just died in the first place and never tried to preemptively provide for them by manufacturing methamphetamine.

But, of course, Walt doesn't really care about his family, five seasons of protestations to the contrary notwithstanding, and so he does not turn himself in, but instead travels to an isolated cabin in New Hampshire inside a propane tank. Which is pretty spectacular symbolism for this guy who is about to blow the fuck up. Somehow. At someone.

Meanwhile, the DEA is about to drop Marie off at the home she shared with Hank (RIP Hank), and see that someone has busted in and ransacked the joint, so they whisk her away quickly. Of course it was Todd, nicking the recording of Jesse's confession, which we all knew he'd do and thank Maude at least Marie is safe.

Back at Swastika-neck Central, they all watch the recording, and, as Jesse recounts Todd shooting Drew Sharp, the kid on the moped who stumbled across their Great Train Robbery, Todd gives a chilling little grin of satisfaction. It is horrible and Todd is horrible and I hate him SO MUCH.

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Matilda the Long-Haired Seal-Point Cat, sitting on the arm of the couch, looking pretty

Matilda.

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime



Toto: "Rosanna"

Open Wide...

In the News

Here is some stuff in the news today!

The Emmys were last night! Did you care? I didn't! But I was very happy to hear that Breaking Bad won best drama, and that Anna Gunn won best supporting (don't get me started) actress for her role on Breaking Bad. Her dress was beautiful! And Merritt Weaver, who won for playing one of my favorite characters ever, Zoey on Nurse Jackie, gave the best acceptance speech of all time the end!

[Content Note: Transphobia] Cassidy Lynn Campbell, a teenage girl at Marina High School in Huntington Beach (CA), who is trans, was crowned homecoming queen Friday night. I wish that was the happy end of this story, but, unfortunately, a bunch of shithead bullies stole the joy out of it for her. I just want to say that I think Cassidy Lynn Campbell is awesome and brave and neat.

[CN: Sexual violence; rape culture] Navy Hearing in Rape Case Raises Alarm. Welp, that's one way of PUTTING IT MILDLY.

Something something Hillary Clinton something something president.

In other news, Sarah Palin thinks Hillary Clinton isn't fit to be president because something something Benghazi. Yawn blah blah fart.

Meanwhile, she probably agrees with Rick Perry that Rick Perry would still make a great president! [CN: Disablist language and anti-Semitism.]

Continuing the parade of Republican geniuses: Rand Paul says if Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts "loves Obamacare so much" then "he should get it." Rand Paul would have said, "if he loves Obamacare so much, he should MARRY IT," but Rand Paul does not support man-on-legislation marriage.

And finally! Here are some really beautiful pictures from space.

Open Wide...

The Assembly: Atheist Churches Coming to a City Near You (Maybe. Depending on Where You Live.)

[Content Note: Abuse; religious supremacy.]

Welp:

Organized Atheism is now a franchise.

Yesterday, The Sunday Assembly—the London-based "Atheist Church" that has, since its January launch, been stealing headlines the world over—announced a new "global missionary tour." In October and November, affiliated Sunday Assemblies will open in 22 cities: in England, Ireland, Scotland, Canada, the United States and Australia. "I think this is the moment," Assembly founder Sanderson Jones told me in an email last week, "when the Sunday Assembly goes from being an interesting phenomenon to becoming a truly global movement." Structured godlessness is ready for export.

The Assembly has come a long way in eight months: from scrappy East London community venture (motto: "Live Better, Help Often and Wonder More;" method: "part atheist church, part foot-stomping good time") to the kind of organization that sends out embargoed press releases about global expansion projects. "The 3,000 percent growth rate might make this non-religious Assembly the fastest growing church in the world," organizers boast.

There's more to come: In October, the Sunday Assembly (SA) will launch a crowdfunded indiegogo campaign, with the ambitious goal of raising £500,000 (or, about $793,000). This will be followed by a second wave of openings. The effort reads as part quixotic hipster start-up, part Southern megachurch.

...As of now, Jones is still tweaking the message. But he's confident in the model: "It's a way to scale goodness."
Aaaaaaaand I already have a problem with your atheist church, Mr. Jones. Believing one has the market cornered on "goodness" is one of the biggest problems with organized religion. That belief abets abuse; it inherently others; it underwrites the sort of judgment that is not based on the assessment of individual actions, but on statements of religious belief.

I am an atheist, and I do not believe that atheism has the market cornered on "goodness." Not because I believe some faulty religious logic about humans needing god(s) to be decent, but because I pay attention to movement atheism. Which is not universally "good," as it turns out.

This is not the only problem I have with the Assembly:
As the atheist church becomes more church-like, however, it seems to be deliberately downplaying its atheism. Where the Assembly once stridently rejected theism (at April's Assembly, Jones poked fun at the crucifixion), it is now far more equivocal. "How atheist should our Assembly be?", Jones wrote in a recent blog post. "The short answer to that is: not very."

"'Atheist Church' as a phrase has been good to us. It has got us publicity," Evans elaborated. "But the term 'atheist' does hold negative connotations. Atheists are often thought to be aggressive, loud and damning of all religion, where actually most atheists, in the UK anyway, are not defined by their non-belief." At a recent assembly, Jones opined: "I think atheism is boring. Why are we defining ourselves by something we don't believe in?"
Katie Engelhart, who wrote the quoted piece, rhetorically asks in response: "Because that's what atheism is?" Which: Yeah. An atheist church who wants me to downplay my atheism in deference to the religious supremacists who believe I can't possibly be a moral person, I can't possibly have values or faith, without god-belief? Fuck that.

I don't have to "define myself" by my atheism to believe unreservedly that it is nothing of which to be ashamed.

Then again, I'm not building a business. And churches, atheist or otherwise, might not like to think of themselves as businesses, but they're businesses all the same. And that inevitably affects the message. Which is another things churches aren't too keen to admit, even when the Pope himself will make messaging recommendations to improve the PR of his business.

Anyway. I get the urge behind the Assembly. Especially in large parts of the US, like in the small towns in which the Assembly isn't yet targeting, where social life resolves around churches, it might be nice to have some sort of equivalent if you're an atheist. (Of course, those also tend to be the most dangerous places to identify oneself as an atheist.) It might be nice to have a ready-made community of like-minded people if you move to a new town. Etc. I get the social aspect of it.

I don't imagine anyone here needs me to elaborate on my resounding desire to build beloved community.

But god-belief isn't the only problem with religious churches. And it looks to me like some of the problems of a lot of religious institutions are already being replicated. Whooooooooops.

If the Assembly Atheist Church is your thing, I am genuinely happy for you! But it is definitely not for me. No thanks!

Open Wide...