This is so the worst thing you're going to read all day.

[Content Note: Gender essentialism; family policing.]

Here is your reminder that, although occasionally David Frum sounds like a feminist compared to the rest of his party, he is not one:

But while straight young Americans support marriage for gays, increasingly they opt against marriage for themselves. Nearly half of American children, 48%, are now born to unmarried women. Among women without college degrees, and of all races, unwed motherhood has become the norm.

This is the crisis of the American family. Whether same-sex marriage proceeds fast or slow, whether it extends to all 50 states or stops with the current nine plus the District of Columbia, the crisis will be the same.

Children born to single parents face much longer odds in life than children born to married parents. (A new study by ThirdWay.org suggests that the harms are especially intense for boys, less so for girls.) "Odds" are not rules, of course. There are always exceptions.

On average, however, children born to married mothers and fathers are more likely to finish college, more likely to avoid prison and more likely to form marriages themselves than children born to single parents. And precisely because the harms of single parenthood tend to be self-replicating, the breakdown of marriage threatens to harden into a caste divide, with some families launched into cycles of downward mobility because of the unstable relationships of parents or grandparents or great-grandparents.

For 20 years, Americans have fiercely debated whether gays -- who constitute maybe 3% of the population -- should be allowed to marry each other. Meanwhile, Americans have given short shrift to what is happening to the 97% of the population that is allowed to marry, but increasingly opts not to do so.
There is a lot of terrible stuff there! And I will leave it to you to discuss all of it in comments! But I do want to note two quick things:

1. There is increasingly less need for male-partnered women to get married, as women have entered the workforce in greater numbers and thus have direct access to things like healthcare coverage, which was otherwise accessible only via a legal marriage arrangement, and various other legal protections that used to be conferred exclusively by marriage.

Ironically, male-partnered women have gained access to some of these rights because of accommodations begrudgingly conceded to same-sex couples by conservatives who hoped to try to give same-sex partnerships as many legal rights as possible without granting them actual marriage equality. So in their obstinate unwillingness to relinquish the privileging of their super-special relationships—bathed in the shimmering, golden glow that only denying equality to same-sex couples conveys upon their gloriously gilded unions—they have created more options for male-partnered women. Whoops! (And thanks!)

2. Different-sex marriage statistics don't axiomatically reflect any truths about co-parenting (or the lack thereof). There are now many unmarried different-sex partners who cohabitate and co-parent without ever getting married. There are also many unmarried different-sex partners who do not cohabitate but do co-parent.

Further, there are—and always have been—married different-sex people who are shitty parents. Marriage is not a magic spell that guarantees a happy family. Even a physically present parent can be an emotionally absent one. (Which is to say nothing of physically abusive parents.) Just because, say, your father lives in the same house as you doesn't mean you're better off. That is entirely dependent on what kind of father he is.

Much of what Frum is crediting to single motherhood is really a reflection of poverty, toward which single mothers are disproportionately disposed, for a whole lot of reasons that can be addressed in better ways than "add a man with an income." The key is stability, which is indeed aided by functional and safe marriages between people of different or the same sexes. But marriage is only one factor in personal and/or familiar stability.

It is also the most popular individual solution to systemic problems that make instability a problem for lots of folks. Marriage isn't supposed to be about bootstraps.

Open Wide...

Monday Blogaround

This blogaround brought to you by fizzy drinks.

Recommended Reading:

At Flyover Feminism: Let's Talk About Names: Tawny

At Are Women Human?: Let's Talk About Names: Ali, hooks, Lee Boggs

Tressie: How For-Profit Colleges Are Rebuilding the Middle Class?

Living ~400lbs: [Content Note: Fat bias.] Quote of the Day

Tara: Low-Income Tennesseans Resort to 'Health Care Lottery' for Coverage

Andy: [Content Note: Homophobia; rape culture] Right-Winger Says California Dept. of Education is 'Raping Innocence of Children' with New LGBT-Inclusive Books List

Jorge: [Content Note: Racism; misogyny] Labor Attorneys Say Adria Richards' Firing Will Be Hard to Defend

And finally—it's really hard to believe this didn't exist before, now that it does: Nic Cage's Face on All 151 1st Generation Pokemon. Obviously.

Leave your links and recommendations in comments...

Open Wide...

The Walking Thread

image of Daryl kneeling over a dead body, looking sad
Who needs all the hugs? Daryl does, that's who!

(Spoilers are lurching around undeadly herein. CN: Violence.)

Previously on The Walking Dead: Clues to what will happen in this episode of The Walking Dead! Can you guess what things will happen in this episode, based on the scenes just shown to you? I SURE CAN! RIP Merle. Thank you for the very obvious foreshadowing that Merle was totes gonna die in this episode, producers of The Walking Dead. Your terrific storytelling is excellent, as always.

The title of this episode is "This Sorrowful Life," which is a pretty apt title for every episode, and could only be more accurate if it was "This Sorrowful Attempt at Great Storytelling with Rich Character Development and Solid Internal Consistency." That's a bigger mouthful than Merle's fingers, though, so I will be satisfied with "This Sorrowful Life." Because I'm charitable like that. Ahem.

When the episode opens, Grimes is telling Hershel and Daryl that turning over Michonne to Governor Cyclops is "the only way" to keep them all safe, because Grimes is super stupid and still imagines there a way in which Governor Cyclops will leave them alone. This fucking guy. "Well, Governor Cyclops has been totes operating in good faith so far, except for all the murder and rapeyness and zombie heads in aquariums and letting loose a van-load of zombies on our property OH OKAY I SEE YOUR POINT," Grimes DIDN'T say.

Instead, despite Hershel's and Daryl's expressed reservations, Grimes trots off to find Merle, who FOR REAL is tearing apart prison mattresses in search of drugs, and tell him all about his genius plan to turn over Michonne to Governor Cyclops. Grimes, wicked judgy about Merle's dope-search, asks him with a sneer if he "even knows why you do the things you do, make the choices you make," which HA HA is a little like the pot asking the kettle if it knows why it does the things it does and makes the choices it makes. Merle responds by telling Grimes he doesn't have the spine to turn over Michonne, and Grimes yells, "SHUT UP I DO SO!" before running away with windmill arms.

Ha ha just kidding. Grimes stays put long enough for Merle to tell him, CORRECTLY AND WISELY, that Grimes is a dipshit if he thinks Governor Cyclops is going to kill Michonne, when obviously he is going to torture her mercilessly, and that Grimes is "cold as ice" if he turns over Michonne knowing damn well that's going to happen. Grimes huffily tells Merle they need to get Michonne "to the Governor by noon," and THEN he runs away with windmill arms.

Meanwhile, Michonne is killing zombies with Glenn and Daryl, because she is awesome. She comes up with a good strategy to protect Grimes Jail from Governor Cyclops, and when Grimes says it's a good plan, Daryl underlines that it is Michonne's plan, because he is awesome. But Grimes will not be deterred. He yells, "STOP TRYING TO CHANGE MY MIND, DARYL! SHUT UP, BUTTHOLE!" and then runs away with windmill arms.

Back inside Grimes Jail, Merle's hunting for booze, and Carol, questioning his loyalties, tells him, "It's not time to do shots; it's time to pick a side." I know that probably sounds like some made-up dialogue that I inserted in place of the real dialogue, but NOPE! Those are the real words that come out of Carol's mouth in that scene!

Elsewhere, Daryl asks Glenn if Merle has apologized to him yet, and Glenn is silent. Daryl presses on, saying he'll make sure Merle makes up for tying Glenn to a chair and beating him up and handing over Maggie to Governor Cyclops, but also Glenn has to be forgiving. Whoooooooooops Daryl! That was a shitty thing to say! Glenn reminds him that Merle tied him to a chair and beat him up and handed over Maggie to Governor Cyclops, and Daryl makes a whoopsface, because what else is he gonna say? Aside from, "Yeah, fair point, I'm sorry I just said you should forgive my brother. What I MEANT to say was: Thanks for not stabbing my brother in the throat like he fucking deserves."

Daryl then ambles off to confront Merle, now on the hunt for drugs in Ye Olde Gaol Apothecary, and Merle makes a speech about how Grimes Gang looks at him like he's the devil for handing over Maggie to the Governor, even though they're now planning to do the same thing with Michonne. GOOD POINT, MERLE! Someone give that guy a candy cigarette. (His disappointment will be priceless! Do it!)

Meanwhile, Hershel and Maggie and Blonde Sister hold hands around a table while Hershel reads Meaningful Passages aloud from the Bible. His droning recital continues in voiceover as Grimes picks through garbage looking for cordage to tie up Michonne, during which he sees Pregnant Ghost Lori, i.e. the projection of his garbage conscience, and then throws down the cord and walks away to tell everyone THE PLAN IS OFF. Ixnay on the Idnapkay.

But whoooooooooooooooooooooops Merle didn't get the message, because he's off killing zombies in the bowels of Grimes Jail with Michonne, whom he thunks on the head and drags off to bind her up and start walking her to Unpleasantville. By the time Grimes locates Daryl to give him the GREAT NEWS about how he's not quite as terrible a garbage monster as he was five seconds before seeing his dead wife's pregnant ghost, Merle and Michonne are long gone. Daryl takes off after them, while Grimes stays behind to give a poignant barfy speech to everyone else in which he confesses he was going to sacrifice Michonne for their safety without telling them, and declares Grimes Gang is now a democracy. "I'm not your governor." He is definitely still the meter maid of their emotions, though.

On the road to Unpleasantville, Merle and Michonne have a lot of great conversation which reestablishes that Merle is a dirtbag and Michonne is underutilized on the show. He ties her to a post like a dog while he hotwires a car, setting off the car alarm in the process. OH NOES ZOMBIES! Even tied to a post, Michonne kicks ass, and after a scuffle that is no more or less exciting than every scuffle exactly like this one in every episode, they manage to get in the car and drive away.

Michonne tells Merle they can just turn back, and makes the point that it would actually restore some goodwill with Grimes Gang if he returns her unharmed. He says he can't go back, but cuts the binds around her hands, gives her back her blade, and lets her out of the car. Awhile later, Daryl finds her in a field, and, after establishing she has not murdered the fuck out of Merle, he continues on the search for his brother, while she continues on back to Grimes Jail.

Speaking of, back at Grimes Jail, Glenn has a great conversation with Hershel about how he now understands that when Hershel gave him a watch, it was more than just a watch he was passing on—it was the ownership of and responsibility for protecting Maggie's vagina. Hershel tells him that he has his blessing to marry Maggie, so Glenn runs outside and cuts a diamond ring off the finger of a lady zombie, then presents it to Maggie, who says yes without his even asking. I guess the good thing about the zombiepocalypse is that you don't have to worry about the pesky ethics of blood diamonds anymore!

Meanwhile, Merle is drinking booze straight from the bottle in the car, from which he's now blaring music through a cracked window and slowly creeping forward down the road with a gaggle of zombies in tow. The zombies follow him to UN Barn, where Martinez & Co. are lying in wait to ambush Grimes Gang when they show up for the scheduled confab. Merle jumps out of the still-moving car, somehow managing to not impale himself on his own knife-arm, and hides in another building, setting up kill-shop in the window.

When Martinez & Co. come out of hiding to kill the legion of zombies he's brought along for the ride, Merle picks off their faceless minions one by one, until Governor Cyclops finds him. They fight, and Merle somehow manages to not stab Governor Cyclops on his knife-arm, either. Instead, Governor Cyclops bites some fingers off Merle's remaining hand, and then shoots him. RIP Merle.

Well, except for how he's now a zombie. And Daryl, upon arrival at UN Barn, finds Zombie Merle munching on a corpse. He cries, and it is very sad. And then he kills Zombie Merle, because he has to and because he needs to violently vent the lingering emotional turmoil caused from his family of origin, and his regret at how things turned out with Merle, and his fury at how fucked-up the world is.

And we are probably meant to be left thinking, "At least Merle sorta redeemed himself by doing the right thing in the end," but of course Merle didn't do Grimes Gang any damn favors at all, because now Governor Cyclops can return to Unpleasantville with a solid justification for attacking Grimes Jail, as he can report Unpleasantvillagers were killed by Merle, acting on behalf of Grimes Gang.

At least letting Michonne go was a rare moment of decency. Good job, Merle. And goodbye.

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Dudley the Greyhound resting his head on my outstretched leg

Dudley uses my leg as a pillow Saturday afternoon.

When we adopted Dudley, in April of 2010, he was so scared of me touching him that he'd pee on himself in fright if I got near him. I spent long hours lying on the floor, next to his crate where he felt safe, synchronizing my breathing to his, quiet and still, to reassure him I would never hurt him. One day, he came out, and laid down beside me on the floor. I put my hand on his side, across a long scar the origins of which we do not know, and matched him breath for breath. There we laid, until he let me know he needed to go out, and I put on his leash without making him fearful for the first time.

It wasn't until almost two years later that he initiated an intimate snuggle with me, after Zelda gave him an appreciation for seeking out a cuddle with Two-Legs.

Now, as we approach our three-year anniversary of finding one another, there is no trace of the frightened dog who arrived. Not long ago, I fell asleep with my head on his back, our heads meeting in the middle of the couch as our bodies stretched away in opposite directions. There we napped together for an hour or so, two contented little monsters, snoring away.

* * *

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

In The News

[Content note: Transphobia, racism]

It's Monday! You Know What I Always Say About Monday!

It turns out George Zimmerman's brother is a total racist. How weird and unexpected!

Voyager 1 has left the Solar System. Or maybe not. Arguments ensue.

The winning ticket for Saturday night's $338 million Powerball jackpot was sold at a liquor store in Passaic, New Jersey.

GLAAD has changed its name to GLAAD in support of trans inclusivity. Okay.

Tilda Swinton as sleeping in a box at MoMA. Obviously.

VFiles has resurrected the defunct gay magazine XY in its digital archives. Woot!

TruFact™: This is Liss' favourite song.

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime



Double: "The Captain Of Her Heart"

Open Wide...

Reproductive Rights Updates: North Dakota, Kansas, Iowa, Texas, Washington

Quite a bit happening in the anti-autonomy front, much of it this past Friday.

North Dakota made big news over the weekend with what happened Friday--three out of four anti-abortion bills passed. One of those being a resolution to bring "personhood" to ND voters.

Senate Concurrent Resolution 4009, passed and will be on the 2014 general election ballot.

Under the resolution, North Dakota voters will decide whether the state constitution should be amended to protect a human at every stage of life, which some say can mean at conception.

[...]

Senate Bill 2368, which defines life as starting at conception and would prohibit abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy, passed through the House by a 60-32 vote. It was sponsored by Sen. Joe Miller, R-Park River.

The bill also would increase reporting requirements for abortions and prohibit a public higher education institution from contracting with an entity that performs or counsels in favor of abortions.

It does exempt an abortion in the case of a medical emergency.

[...]

Senate Bill 2305, which would require a physician performing an abortion to have admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles of the abortion facility, passed 58-34 in the House.
The TRAP legislation is particularly harmful: there is only one clinic in North Dakota and, as noted in the article, a doctor would need to admit ten patients per year to retain privileges. The clinic has only had to admit one person in the past decade.

The sole defeated legislation last Friday was one that was more "personhood"-esque nonsense which would have defined a human as “as an individual member of the species homo sapiens at every stage of development.” It only lost by six votes.

***

Open Wide...

Number of the Day

[Content Note: Drones; war.]

65%: The percentage of USians in Gallup's latest poll found to believe the US government should use drones to launch airstrikes in other countries against suspected terrorists who are not US citizens.

That is a depressingly high number. But I want to observe something about which I've written previously: Most of the people responding to this poll realize they are effectively making the choice between: 1. Boots-on-the-ground warfare; 2. Drone strikes, which have been widely mischaracterized as "precision strikes" with limited civilian casualties; 3. Doing nothing.

I wrote in September of last year:

I also believe quite fervently that the approval for drones is reflective of that aforementioned lack of a meaningful choice. When our choice is between a Democratic candidate who will wage war with "targeted" drone attacks, or a Republican candidate who will wage war with troops and tanks and treasure and mercenaries and false promises and no exit strategy, I "approve" of drones, too—but only by default.

I authentically, enthusiastically, desperately choose diplomacy over drones. But that is not the choice I'm given.

I live in a war-mongering empire, and the only choice I'm given is in which way I want to wage war. That I don't want to wage war at all doesn't really matter, not to this president, nor any other.
I don't know what the numbers in this poll would look like if the respondents knew there was a meaningful option that included effective diplomatic strategies (of which "doing nothing" might be a part, given that the use of drones is now a key recruiting tool). I would like to know, but I fear that I will never have that chance, because the degree of militarized engagement is the only real option we're given anymore.

Open Wide...

Ladies, Amirite?

[Content Note: Misogyny.]

Shaker insomniax sent me the link to this post about the shock and sexism that resulted after the creator of the popular Facebook page I Fucking Love Science disclosed (via a link to her Twitter account) that she is a woman.

There's nothing I can say which I haven't already said in a million different ways about the inherent misogyny in neither having considered that the creator of any space, particularly a space concerned with science, could be female, nor in having the decency to not respond to that news with a torrent of misogyny, including commenting on the female creator's appearance.

I will, however, observe an odd thing about my own reaction: I would have been surprised if the creator of I Fucking Love Science wasn't a woman. I don't follow the page on FB, but lots and lots of my friends do, so I see content from the page shared all the time. And I can't account for what made me (unconsciously) presume it was female-authored, but I did.

I am reminded of my early days of blogging, when there was a "rumor" that one of the Big Liberal Bloggers was "secretly" a woman, and it took me ages to figure out that people assumed Digby was a man. I also can't account for what made me (correctly) presume that Digby is a woman.

I dunno. I do know, however, that one must be open to the possibility of unidentified content creators being women to come to that conclusion, though, however unaccountable.

* * *

As an aside, early in my blogging, when I was still pseudonymous, even under the female moniker Shakespeare's Sister, I used to get a lot of email accusing me of secretly being a dude masquerading as a woman. And even to this day, after eight years and disclosing my real name and posting countless pictures of myself, I still get the occasional email accusing me of being a male someone else.

It's an interesting commentary on what some people believe women to be capable of, I suppose. It also grants me a far greater capacity for sustained prankery than I have, lol. That would be one hell of a long-con!

Open Wide...

And Then This Happened

Here is the background to this post.

And then Adam Lee—after telling me in comments here that I am being unfair in saying, after a solid week of being harassed and threatened (which is to say nothing of being called unlikable, uncharitable, oversensitive, reactionary, etc.) by self-identified movement atheists in response to offering solicited advice on how to make movement atheism more inclusive for women like me, that "movement atheism doesn't want to have anything to do with me"—wrote this: On Being a Good (and Bad) Ally to Feminists.

In that piece, dedicated to making the same point, he excerpts one line from my nearly 600-word piece and one comment from its 176-comment thread, in order to accuse me of unfairly monolithizing movement atheism.

He says: "To me, this sounds as if she's saying that atheism has only one voice, and it's the voice of the sexists." This, despite the fact that I also wrote in the post from which he quotes: "My admiration for the women who hang in and stick it out and fight the same fights over and over. That is a valid and commendable choice, even though it's not mine."

To accuse me of being unfair, not only does he casually elide that the context of my claim of being unwelcome was a metric fuckton of sustained hostility emanating from movement atheism, but also disappears the recognition I gave to atheist women in the same post he's saying monolithizes movement atheism. Forget whether he's my ally: Ignoring that, because it's inconvenient to his thesis about my monolithizing movement atheism, is being a shitty ally to them—because ignoring it implicitly argues that movement atheism is a men's movement, and my acknowledgement of female atheists doing good work isn't relevant.

It is relevant.

I will say, again, that I know there are men in movement atheism who make a practice of being good allies to women. (At least straight, white, cis women. And some men more broadly than that.)

But I shouldn't need to keep saying that over and over. Obliging me to salve the consciences of men affiliated with a movement which, irrespective of their efforts, is still incredibly hostile to lots of women outside (and inside) of it, is antithetical to being an ally and incompatible with making me feel like there is a place for me in the movement, if I want my role to be anything but deferential gratitude to men for being decent human beings.

And I will note again, as I did in direct replies to Adam Lee in comments here, that how welcoming movement atheism (or any other self-identified movement) is to marginalized people is subjective, and is not defined by how many people want to welcome marginalized people, but by how many people don't. That any percentage of any privileged group can be hostile enough to make the entire group unsafe for marginalized members is basic social justice 101.

Again, these are dynamics I understand as a privileged member (white, cis) of another self-identified movement (feminism). When a non-white and/or non-cis person says zie does not feel like feminism wants anything to do with hir, I understand that—because I am aware of both the history of mainstream feminism and its current hostilities to non-white and non-cis people. (Among others.)

Yes, it is my job to make the spaces over which I have influence more welcoming and inclusive. No, it is not my job to explain to people who feel unwelcome that they're wrong to feel that way; that to criticize the overwhelming nature of the movement is to monolithize it; that they are being uncharitable and prickly and unlikeable; that, hey, I'm one of the Good Ones, as if that's an immutable state, as if privilege doesn't mean there's always the capacity to fuck up.

In fact, those two activities are utterly incompatible.

There is a thing we say here, long ago introduced in comments by Rana: If the shoe doesn't fit, don't wear it.

That is the concept to which I turn when I read criticisms of mainstream feminism. I listen, hard, to the criticisms being made, and I don't filter them through a validity prism. Instead, I assess whether the person talking about mainstream feminism is talking about me because of my own actions, as I damn well know criticisms of marginalization and exclusion in mainstream feminism are fair, irrespective of the exact number of feminists who engage in it.

If I do not behave in the manner being criticized, then I don't wear the shoe. And if I do behave in the manner being criticized, I had better wear that fucking shoe and get my shit in order.

Either way, I don't defend a movement that I agree needs changing on precisely the basis being held up for criticism.

Anyway. Over in comments at Adam's place, commenter athyco solidly destroys the notion that Adam is making an intellectually honest argument. I don't know who you are, athyco, but thanks. So I will simply leave it at this: Suffice it to say that having my words cherry-picked, thus disappearing my inconvenient acknowledgment of atheist women fighting the good fight, in order to accuse me of being insufficiently appreciative of the men who assert to be my ally while claiming the right to audit my feelings about my lived experience, has not changed my mind about movement atheism.

If this is the welcome mat, I have no desire to walk through the door.

Which I'm certain is of no concern to the number of men in movement atheism (and some women) who have spent the past week discussing amongst themselves what an uncharitable, cold, and variously terrible specimen I am. Nor should it be. I started out writing why I felt alienated from movement atheism, and it wasn't in expectation of a personal invitation.

But what would be of concern to me, were I on the other side of this thing, is that even reasonable expectations of some pushback from the "small but vocal group" were wildly exceeded by petty personal criticisms and gross emotional auditing care of those who identify themselves as part of the ostensibly welcoming majority.

Open Wide...

Open Thread



Kangaroos

Open Wide...

Sunday Shuffle

Rage Against the Machine, Renegades of Funk

How about you?

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of Arthur Carlson, a white balding older man, the station manager at WKRP

Hosted by Arthur Carlson.

This week's Open Threads have been hosted by characters from WKRP in Cincinnati.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of the WKRP character Les Nessman, a white man with glasses, reporting from the field

Hosted by Les Nessman.

Open Wide...

The Virtual Pub Is Open

image of a pub Photoshopped to be named 'The Impolite Pub'
[Explanations: lol your fat. pathetic anger bread. hey your gay.]

TFIF, Shakers!

Belly up to the bar,
and name your poison!


And don't forget to tip your bartender!



Open Wide...

Friday Afternoon Dance Party!



Joan Jett and the Blackhearts, "Bad Reputation"
[lyrics here]

If you are getting the sense that I am completely out of steam for the week and have rapidly descended into the abyss of uselessness, that would not be an inaccurate perception, lol.

Open Wide...

Cool Reminders & The Validity Prism

With my apologies to those who are on Twitter, and thus are seeing these for a second time, here are some other thoughts from my busy day on Twitter for those who aren't all up in the social media:

Open Wide...

#IAskedPolitely

So, in response to the ubiquitous admonishment that Adria Richards should have politely asked the men who were making a professional conference a hostile environment with sexually inappropriate jokes to please, sirs, stop being so gross, I started a hashtag: #IAskedPolitely, for people to document the responses they've gotten to politely asking for someone to stop harassing or harming them.

The point is not to start a conversation about whether we should be polite or not.

#IAskedPolitely is not about the validity of being polite. It's about the futility.

Open Wide...

For the Record

Apropos of other infuriating conversations going on in the series of tubes recently, I just want to state, plainly, that I have no problem being identified as a cis woman, cis lady, cis feminist, white woman, white lady, white feminist, or any other related iterations thereof.

I am both of these things.

I am a cis woman. I am a white feminist.

These are both parts of my complex identity which are privileged by the larger culture and the feminist movement.

Being reminded of my privilege does not feel hostile. It feels like a request to please be vigilant, to please remember not to misrepresent my experience as universal.

I've got no reason to be angry about that, and neither does anyone else.

[Related Reading: Feminism 101: Situational and Relative Privilege.]

Open Wide...

Friday Blogaround

This blogaround brought to you by thistles.

Recommended Reading:

Trudy: Thinking About Adria Richards and Other Black Women in STEM Fields [Content Note: The post at this link includes discussion of racism, misogyny, and harassment. I normally feel squidgy about linking posts that link to me, but, seriously, go read what Trudy says, y'all. I ain't recommending it because I'm quoted, trust me.]

Shannon: Who Is This Again? [Content Note: The post at this link includes discussion of racism and misogyny.]

FMF News: Kansas House Passes Abortion Restrictions

Jorge: Chicago to Close 61 Public School Facilities to Address $1 Billion Deficit [Content Note: The post at this link includes discussion of racism, classism, and violence.]

Abby: The Day I Taught How Not to Rape [Content Note: Rape culture. H/T to everyone in the multiverse.]

Democracy Now!: Phil Donahue on His 2003 Firing from MSNBC, When Liberal Network Couldn't Tolerate Antiwar Voices [Please note there is a transcript of the video available at the link.]

Joshua: Confessions of a Black Morrissey Fan [Every word of this. Every word.]

Rebecca: [video] Watch a 13-Year-Old Girl Bench Press 240 Pounds Like It's Not Even a Big Deal

Leave your links and recommendations in comments...

Open Wide...