Headline of the Day

"Rand Paul Fears For Jane Fonda."—Washington Post.

"Unless she needs a lifesaving abortion, in which case she can FOAD."--Ana Mardoll (shared with her permission).

I truly do not know what the best part of this is. The awesomely current pop culture reference? His wildly hypocticial defense of a Republican president's designated enemy, who's been used as a Satan stand-in by his party for literally as long as I can remember? Or the stopped-clock nature of his concern for those rights that impact members of marginalized groups, but only when they also affect elite white straight men?

I breathlessly await his impassioned defense of John Lennon's "More popular than Jesus" remarks any day now.

Open Wide...

An Observation

[Content Note: Rape culture.]

The difference between "all men are rapists" and "a woman cannot tell by looking at a man whether he is a rapist" is vast and readily discerned. And I am really tired of reading rape apologists conflate the two, as if they are easily confused. Failing to distinguish between the two is not a mistake; it's an agenda.

Open Wide...

Don't Worry, Everyone: Mitt Romney Is Going to Land on His Feet!

I know we've all been very worried about what multimillionaire historical footnote Mitt Romney was going to do to survive, after he lost the presidential election following what was just a terrific campaign that made all of us love him very much. So it brings me much joy to be able to share with you the awesome news that, despite this terrible unemployment crisis, Mitt Romney has found himself a job:

Former GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney will be returning to work, joining his son Tagg's investment firm.

Romney will serve as chairman of the executive committee for Solamere Capital, where he'll work for one week a month on private equity matters, reports NBC News.
Cool job! I'm thinking of investing some of my gold bars and rubies with Mitt Romney, but I'm not sure what percentage of my enviable wealth I should give him. I'm thinking somewhere around 47%.

Anyway. My top secret sources ("Best in the biz!"—Sir Wolf Blitzer) have sent me some images of Mitt Romney's first day on the job, and it looks like everything's going pretty great.

image of Mitt Romney standing a white board writing on it with a marker; I have photoshopped it to read, as though in his handwriting: 'Things This Office Needs: cushballs, monkeys / Doesn't Need: women'

Good luck at your new job, Mitt Romney! See you at CPAC next week!

Open Wide...

Filibusted

Yesterday, Republican Senator Rand Paul mounted a thirteen-hour filibuster in opposition to the nomination of John Brennan for CIA director. This is the third Republican filibuster of an Obama nominee since the filibuster reform deal in January, and Senate Democrats are furious (and apparently surprised) that Republicans have not honored the spirit of the middling bipartisan agreement that still left room for precisely this to happen.

In an interview on Wednesday afternoon, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), the author of a proposal to place more of the burden of sustaining a filibuster on the minority party, including forcing filibustering senators to speak on the floor, echoed remarks by Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL) earlier in the day about the need to revisit filibuster reform.

"Senate Republicans have demonstrated that they have absolutely no intention of ending their assault on the ability of the U.S. Senate to function," Merkley told TPM, saying he had hoped the bipartisan rules change would ease gridlock. "Many of my colleagues are absolutely beside themselves with frustration, and that frustration is rapidly turning to fury."
GOOD. Because someone who actually has the power to do something needs to get angry about the Republicans' obstructionism turning the federal government into a colossally expensive roadblock to progress, or even basic functionality.

On a side note, Senator Paul is being widely praised for mounting a filibuster that was critical of the Obama administration's drone program. Stopped clock, etc. Paul claims it was not a partisan attack, which I believe; nonetheless, Paul is a hypocritical jerk who, like his father, only champions freedoms from which he stands to personally benefit, while endeavoring to undermine reproductive choice, disability legislation, and healthcare access (for a start). So I'm not going to praise Rand Paul. I am, however, going to say it is the Democrats' shame that they weren't the ones asking the same questions.

Open Wide...

Open Thread



Hosted by Bengali.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Suggested by Shaker koach: "What technology has made a significant impact in your life (technology recently adopted, perhaps, or tech that you thought you wouldn't like but have, etc.)?"

My life has never been the same since Al Gore invented the internet.

Open Wide...

Arkansas Now Has the Most Restrictive Abortion Law in the US

[Content Note: Hostility to agency and choice; references to genocide.]

The war on agency just got really fucking ugly in Arkansas:

In the sharpest challenge yet to Roe v. Wade, Arkansas adopted Wednesday what is by far the country's most restrictive ban on abortion, at 12 weeks of pregnancy, around the time that a fetal heartbeat can be detected by abdominal ultrasound.

The law was passed by the newly Republican-controlled legislature over the veto of Gov. Mike Beebe, a Democrat, who called it "blatantly unconstitutional." On Tuesday the state Senate voted to override his veto by a vote of 20 to 14; on Wednesday the House enacted the bill into law by a vote of 55 to 33, with several Democrats joining the Republican majority.

The law contradicts the limit established by Supreme Court decisions, which give women a right to an abortion until the fetus is viable outside the womb, usually around 24 weeks into pregnancy, and abortion rights groups promised a quick lawsuit to block it.

Adoption of the law, called the "Human Heartbeat Protection Act," is the first statewide victory for a restless emerging faction within the anti-abortion movement that has lost patience with the incremental whittling away at abortion rights — the strategy of established groups like National Right to Life and the Catholic Church while they wait for a more sympathetic Supreme Court.

"When is enough enough?" asked the bill's sponsor in the legislature, Senator Jason Rapert, a 40-year-old Republican and conservative Christian, who compared the more than 50 million abortions in the United States since Roe v. Wade, in 1973, to the Holocaust and the Rwandan genocide. "It's time to take a stand."

...The center and the American Civil Liberties Union have vowed to swiftly bring a case in federal court, aiming to head off the law before it takes effect 90 days after the legislature disbands in the next month or so.
For shits and grimaces, I will, for a moment, entertain Rapert's ostensible premise that a fetus has the equivalent value of the born uterus-having person carrying it. Great. So what? My life, right now, is not so precious that any other human being could be compelled to use their body to support mine for the next nine months (at least). No other human being is obliged to give up an organ for me, even if it would save my life. Nor bone marrow, nor blood, nor skin. People who are forced to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term are being asked to do something no other people are asked to do for another person, which exposes the truth of the anti-choice position: Fetuses are valued more highly than the people who carry them.

Here's the other thing: We institutionally value lives differently, some more than others, all the time. We value lives of US citizens more than the lives of non-USians. We value the lives of inmates less than the lives of the free population (among whom are many highly-rewarded perpetrators of white-collar crimes). We value the lives of the wealthy more than the poor. We value the lives of people we allow to live without healthcare access less than the lives of those who by fate or fortune have health insurance. And these are only the valuations that can and do routinely mean a visible difference between life and death.

Which is to say nothing of all the kyriarchal valuations of lives that have repercussions small and large and sometimes deadly, too.

(We also wisely value some lives over others for complex reasons, like the life of the highly-protected US President over the life of an average citizen.)

But the people who are in the seats of power that legislatively prioritize US, supposedly law-abiding, wealthy, healthcare-having lives over others are largely very privileged men. And we are expected to understand that their agreement to globally prioritize their own lives over everyone else's is Moral Values, and an individual woman's choice to value her life over a fetus is murder.

Even conceding Rapert's alleged frame, he's still totally fucking wrong.

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

[Content Note: Guns.]

"It's a deterrent ordinance. It tells the potential intruder you better think twice."—Nelson, Georgia, City Councilman Duane Cronic, on the city's proposed plan, which will be under consideration as soon as next month, which would require every homeowner to own a gun, due to limited police resources.

1. The fuck?

2. Gun ownership does not deter crime.

3. Do Cronic and his cohorts imagine that the only perpetrators of crime are from out of town? If everyone is required to own a gun, how would that even serve as a deterrent, even if gun ownership deterred crime, which it does not?

4. This.

Open Wide...

Democracy Is Doing Great, Everyone

Currently on the front page of CNN:

screen capture of a headline reading: 'Bush fatigue may haunt Jeb in 2016'

Ha ha Bush fatigue! No way! 1. The Bush family is terrific. 2. It's totally normal and definitely the sign of a super-duper healthy democracy to have a member of the same family be president every other presidency.

Open Wide...

Today in Just Like Jesus Would Do

[content note:Christian supremacy, anti-LGBT*Q discrimination, homophobia, child abuse, kidnapping]

Kenneth Miller is a Beachy Amish-Mennonite pastor who aided a kidnapping that broke up a family:

Mr. Miller was convicted last fall for helping to arrange the covert flight to Nicaragua of Lisa A. Miller with her daughter, Isabella Miller-Jenkins, in 2009.

Ms. Miller, who is not related to the pastor, had won support in conservative Christian circles for refusing to permit court-mandated visits with Isabella by her other legal mother, Janet Jenkins, Ms. Miller’s former partner in a civil union in Vermont. After the couple split up, Ms. Miller moved to Virginia, said she was a born-again Christian and denounced her former lesbianism as a sin.

In 2009, as an exasperated family court judge threatened to transfer primary custody to Ms. Jenkins, Ms. Miller and her daughter, then 7, disappeared and a warrant was issued for Ms. Miller’s arrest.

Federal law enforcement officers later discovered that Mr. Miller had helped arrange for Ms. Miller and her daughter to fly to Nicaragua and live there with missionaries from Mr. Miller’s Amish-Mennonite sect. But officials have been unable to find the mother and daughter, who, in the view of one federal agent, have been “bouncing around the barrios of Nicaragua” for nearly four years now.

Miller was allegedly aided by "Philip Zodhiates, a wealthy conservative businessman who lives near Mr. Miller in Virginia, and his daughter, Victoria Hyden, an administrative assistant at the Liberty University Law School in Lynchburg, Va." He refused to implicate them, because Jesus, apparently:

After his conviction, Mr. Miller refused to testify before a grand jury about others who aided Ms. Miller, telling his supporters: “If I were to bring testimony against a fellow member of Christ’s kingdom, for honoring Christ’s kingdom’s laws, I would be disloyal to his kingdom and to Christ.”

Liss has emphasized before how very dangerous is the bias in U.S. society that automatically awards publicly identified "Christians" with an automatic assumption of morality and good faith. I do not know if that assumption played into the judge's decision to let a convicted accessory to kidnapping to walk free until his appeal process plays out.

But, considering that the judge told Mr. Miller he "he admired Miller for the depth of his convictions,", I have a sneaking suspicion that it did. If Miller and his cohorts had not been using Christianity to justify putting a child beyond the reach of the court (and of a judge who was so concerned about her primary-care parent that she was about to change custody arrangements) he might have been treated differently. I also have a strong suspicion that if this had been a straight couple, things would be different, too.

Mr. Miller, I do not admire your for your convictions. Your convictions are bigoted drivel, and drove you to a terrible, hateful, crime. These are "family values," I guess, except without actually valuing real families. Kidnapping: Just Like Jesus Would Do.

Open Wide...

Wednesday Blogaround

This blogaround brought to you by chocolate.

Recommended Reading:

Shelley: The High Costs of Weight Loss Surgery [Content Note: The post at this link contains discussion of fat bias and medical issues.]

ArteToLife: Don't Tell Me Your Hate Isn't Killing Us [Content Note: The post at this link contains discussion of fat bias, body policing, diet talk, violence, and bullying.]

Kath: You Can't Hold a Fat Bitch Down [Content Note: The post at this link contains discussion of fat bias, misogyny, and diet talk.]

Sikivu: School-to-Prison Sequestration & White Post-Racial Privilege [Content Note: The post at this link contains discussion of racism.]

Fannie: What Would You Do If You Witnessed Bigotry? [Content Note: The post at this link contains discussion of homophobia and gender essentialism.]

Spectra: Kitchen Table Conversations Live Podcast: African Women and Girl Storytellers in the Digital Age

Living ~400lbs: Wealth Inequality

Angry Asian Man: Family of Japanese Student Killed by NYPD Patrol Car Wants Answers [Content Note: Violence; racism.]

Veronica: RIP Dawn Clark Netsch

Leave your links and recommendations in comments...

Open Wide...

Today in Totally Shocking Vatican Facts

[Content note: rape, dismissal of survivors, instutional abuse.]

Here are some totally shocking facts that emerged today about the Vatican!

One: It's secretive!

The College of Cardinals that will elect the next pope cut off formal communications with the news media on Wednesday after their private deliberations emerged in the Italian press, raising the specter of a leaking scandal that cast a pall over the last year in office of Pope Benedict XVI.

Two: It's shitty at being secretive!

“Concern was expressed in the General Congregation about leaks of confidential proceedings reported in Italian newspapers,” said Sister Mary Ann Walsh, director of media relations for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, who has organized news conferences with American cardinals in recent days. “As a precaution, the cardinals have agreed not to do interviews.”

Three: It's shitty at doing media!

...the Vatican has sought to satiate the army of accredited journalists flowing into Rome with brief glimpses behind the conclave curtain. On Monday, the Vatican showed a video of cardinals sitting, standing and reading in the theater where the congregations are held. On Tuesday, the feature presentation was a silent film with a camera panning over the three urns that will contain ballots during the election.

The video, which had the disembodied hands of a home shopping network presentation and the glacial pace of a Michelangelo Antonioni film, was accompanied by a Vatican press release explaining the significance and artistry of the containers. (“These are treated with a light patina which underlines the various chromatics of the bronze, the irregularities on the surface and the contrast between opaqueness and brightness.”)

Four: It's shitty to rape survivors!

Earlier Wednesday, the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (SNAP), an organization that supports victims of sex abuse by clerics, held a well-attended news conference in which it released a list of a “dirty dozen” cardinals it considers unacceptable leaders of the church based on their past handling of the child sex-abuse crisis. Among them were cardinals often mentioned as prime candidates for the pontificate, including cardinals Timothy Dolan of New York, O’Malley of Boston, Leonardo Sandri of Argentina, Peter Turkson of Ghana, Angelo Scola of Italy and Marc Ouellet of Canada.

“It really isn’t up to SNAP to decide who should or should not participate in the conclave,” said [Vatican spokesperson Rev. Tom] Rosica.

SHOCKED! I am SHOCKED to find gambling bumbling and Patriarchy at the Vatican!

Now, about that infallibility....

Open Wide...

What I Learned in First Grade

I'm sure I learned a lot of stuff in first grade—how to spell two-syllable words and basic math symbols and chisanbop—but I don't remember learning any of it. I have only two clear memories of the first grade, of which the report card thread put me in mind.

The first is drinking milk when Mrs. Ballas left the classroom during snacktime. I don't remember why she left—probably to run off some dittoes (it was like the internet, but with a hand-crank) or because she had to fart and didn't want to do it in front of a classroom of six-year-olds. I just remember that we were told to eat our snacks and drink our tiny cartons of milk and be quiet and don't leave our seats for any reason.

Maybe it was because Mrs. Ballas was out of the classroom, but I decided to try an experiment with my milk. There were two ways to drink milk: Through the provided straw, or straight from the inevitably mangled crease at the paper carton's opening. For unknown reasons (besides being a six-year-old), I wondered what would happen if I put the straw in the carton, closed the opening, and then tried to drink the milk upside-down from the straw.

What happens is that milk pours all over your face and down the front of your shirt.

I sat in the back of the class, near the sink, which we used to wash hands after painting projects and under which was stored the magic green powder that was poured on vomit. So I got up from my desk, without even a thought for the don't leave your seat rule, to clean the milk from my face and hair and clothes.

Immediately, the classroom filled with "ooooooh!" and "sssssssss!" and "I'm gonna tell!" My face burned red. I was going to be in big trouble. I hastily grabbed a few paper towels, dampened them, and returned to my desk, as 25 other judgmental faces glared at me.

My mind raced. I never got in trouble. I didn't know what was going to happen to me. Part of my mind was in a spiraling panic about the consequences I was going to face for breaking the rules. Another part of my mind was angry at my classmates for threatening to be tattling jerks because I didn't want to sit in class with milk souring on me.

The moment Mrs. Ballas returned to the classroom, half a dozen kids ratted me out. "Melissa got out of her seat!" "Melissa went to the sink while you were gone!" "Melissa broke the rules!"

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime



ZZ Top: "Gimme All Your Lovin'"

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Matilda the Cat with her eyes narrowed and her ears turned back

Matilda is totes over it. She really thinks you should just get in your little fucking boat and get the fuck outta here. Go catch a fish! (And then give it to her. NOM.)

[True Fact: Iain and I were watching Striking Distance, the movie whence came the above-linked clip, and that scene just struck us as SO FUNNY that we reversed and rewatched it like a thousand times, until we were laughing so hard we were crying. And now it's just become a staple of conversation at Shakes Manor. Like, when I ask Iain if he's in the mood to watch a movie, and he suggests Timecop for the biebillionth time, just to annoy me, I am very likely to respond: "Get in your little fucking boat and get the fuck outta here!" When I mentioned this to Deeky recently, he found it and uploaded it to YouTube for me, because he is awesome.]

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

Discussion Thread: Report Card Snapsnots


Actually, I had severe shyness and social anxiety, but whatever! Potato potahto.


Anyway. Do you remember any comments on your early report cards that gave a glimpse into the adult you would become, or suggests a different person entirely? Anything just funny or strange or defeating or inspiring?

Open Wide...

In The News

[Content note: Homophobia]

It's Wednesday and the Weather Sucks:

Carrie Fisher will return for the next Star Wars sequel.

Hugo Chavez died.

Michigan's Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians nation has voted to approve marriage equality under its tribal laws.

Conservative Ramesh Ponnuru wonders if conservatives actually want to win elections lulz.

New Dr. Who pictures.

Carly Rae Jepsen has cancelled her Boy Scout Jamboree appearance.

News Corp has a tablet for schools. Obviously.

A tragic Lego disaster along a West Virginia highway results in a one-lane shutdown.

Open Wide...

Women's History Month REPOST: Ancient & Medieval

(This is a repost of the first in a series of four posts recommending books and films on the history of women, gender, sexuality, feminism, and related topics, that was first published here at Shakesville in 2012. An extremely brief introduction to Women's History as a academic topic is also available.

It's pretty astonishing to think that up until very recently, women were people without a history. As Joan Kelly pointed out in her influential 1977 essay,"Did Women Have a Renaissance?" even our historical frameworks are skewed towards the experiences of wealthy, white men.

Re-thinking history from the perspective of women, then, is a deeply feminist act, helping challenge cultural narratives that marginalize, dismiss, or essentialize women. Unfortunately, women's history is still poorly integrated into many history curricula, so it's possible to get through our educational years with very little interaction with women's history or its related histories of gender and sexuality.
So, in honor of Women's History Month in the United States, I'm offering a series of four posts in which I will make some recommendations for books and films on the history of women, and invite you to make your own recommendations or in comments. Some are academic works, others are works of popular history.

My lists are just beginning points, not comprehensive. They are necessarily skewed by my areas of research and teaching; they are intended to start conversations, so please, jump in with your suggestions! Some of these books are academic and peer-reviewed; some are popular. Some approaches are explicitly feminist, while others are definitely not.

If you have been doing some great reading (or viewing) in women's history, this is your chance to share! If you've been thinking you'd like to learn more about women's history, these posts should give you some ideas!

Part I: Ancient and Medieval (to c. 1500 CE).

Book: The Far Traveler: Voyages of a Viking Woman, by Nancy Marie Brown. This book traces the travels of Gudrid, a medieval Scandinavian woman who sailed the Atlantic, leaving behind literary traces in the Viking sagas, and even archaeological traces. Only women performed certain work in Scandinavian culture; this book reminds us that they we re an essential part of the Viking travels.

Book: Hatchepsut: The Female Pharaoh by Joyce A. Tyldesley. Queen Hatshepsut, although apparently a ciswoman by birth, took on the beard and other traditionally masculine trappings of a Pharoah as she ruled over ancient Egypt. I wish this book had more consideration of her gender identity, but other than that it is a wonderfully thorough (and readable!) work full of background about her remarkable family, the Thutmosids, and their world. It has intrigue, danger, political maneuvering, and the backdrop of a society that recognized a remarkably wide range of women's freedoms.

DVD: Secrets of the Dead: "Amazon Warrior" Women. I am a junkie for the PBS series "Secrets of the Dead," and this episode is one of my favorites. Taking on the question of whether or not the "Amazons" of Greek mythology actually existed, the series uses a wide range of sources to explore their historicity, from an "Amazon" grave to modern DNA testing. I don't want to give away the ending, but the answer to the question can be summed up as: "Sort of."

Book: Dinah's Daughters: Gender and Judaism from the Hebrew Bible to Late Antiquity by Helena Zlotnick. This is an academic study that thoroughly covers gender roles in ancient Judaism. While I found it a little depressing in parts--particularly as it examines the contrasts between "bad" gentile women and "good" Jewish women, it really enriched my understanding of gender and early Abrahamic religion. An academic work, but well worth the effort if that sort of thing interests you.

Book: The Secret History of the Mongol Queens: How the Daughters of Genghis Khan Rescued His Empire by Jack Weatherford. This enjoyable little book tells the story of Genghis Khan's female heirs, his daughters and daughters-in-law, who took control of his kingdom after his death, sparking an era of epic struggle. I particularly enjoyed the unforgettable Queen Mandhuhai who bore eight children in the midst of a successful career on the battlefield (so much for Rick Santorum's theories about women in the military!)

Book: Letters of the Nun Eshinni: Images of Pure Land Buddhism in Medieval Japan by James C Dobbins. Eshinni was a 13th century nun and eyewitness to the founding of the Pure Land school of Buddhism. The author uses her letters to uncover the way she and other women used religion to carve out a positive female identity in a world full of overwhelmingly negative female imagery. I have very little background in the history of Buddhism or of women in Japan, yet I had no trouble following the book, and found it all-around informative.

Book: Women in Ancient America by Karen Olsen Bruhns and Karen E. Stothert . A thorough discussion on women in the pre-Columbian Americas, on every topic ranging from food production, warfare, households, and women's distinctive religious roles in early American societies. Very strong on Mesoamerican women in particular., It's thoroughly grounded in archaeology and the introduction even does a nice job of laying out exactly how archaeologists use gender as a category of analysis.

DVD: The Ancient World: Helen of Troy. Bettany Hughes is one of my favorite presenters, and this episode of her "Ancient World" series sees her exploring the world of Helen of Tory is a completely engaging way. She reminds us that Helen was originally from Sparta, and explored the powerful role that women played in Spartan religion. There's even a recreation of what Helen's makeup might have looked like. Although framed around Helen, this episode explores the role of royal women in ancient Greek society more generally.

Coming up: Part II: Early Modern (1500-1800 CE); Part III: Nineteenth Century CE; Part IV: 20th Century CE

[Commenting Note: In addition to our usual commenting standards, I ask that we be respectful of others' experiences in discovering women's history. A work that is helpful to one person may have its flaws, and it's fine to talk about that. If nothing else, research does get out dated. But please respect that this work was important to the commenter for a reason. Also please note that while not every recommendation must be flawless by social justice standards, works in which anti-trans*, heterocentrist, racist, and/or other marginalizing material are central are not welcome.]

Open Wide...

Zimmerman Waives "Stand Your Ground" Hearing

[Content Note: Eliminationist violence; guns.]

Yesterday, George Zimmerman, who shot and killed unarmed teenager Trayvon Martin just over a year ago, waived his right to a "Stand Your Ground" hearing ahead of his trial that had the potential to result in the dismissal of all charges. Apparently, his lawyers thought it was a bad bet, despite the fact that the "Stand Your Ground" policy has been at the center of Zimmerman's public defense and was cited as the reason he was not charged in the first place until a national public outcry led to his arrest.

Zimmerman contends that he shot and killed the 17-year-old Martin after the teen confronted him as he walked to his father's girlfriend's house. Were [Judge Debra Nelson] to have accepted his account under Stand Your Ground, all criminal proceedings would have immediately stopped, and Zimmerman would have walked free.

But another unfavorable ruling by Nelson [who previously ruled in favor of the state that Zimmerman's bail conditions should not be loosened] could have been interpreted by jurors as a sign of guilt. Waiving the hearing could also prevent the prosecution from picking apart Zimmerman's testimony.
Zimmerman's defense team "left open the possibility for that hearing to be rolled into Zimmerman's second degree murder trial," so a "Stand Your Ground" defense is still a possibility, but he's definitely going to trial and will not, as was an earlier concern, have the proceedings short-circuited by the ruling of a single judge.

Open Wide...

Morning in America 2.0

[Content Note: Drones.]

Adam Serwer at Mother Jones: Obama Administration Says President Can Use Lethal Force Against Americans on US Soil. I encourage you to read the whole article, but I do want to highlight this piece of Attorney General Eric Holder's excerpted letter explaining the justification for the administration's position:

The question you have posed is therefore entirely hypothetical, unlikely to occur, and one we hope no president will ever have to confront. It is possible, I suppose, to imagine an extraordinary circumstance in which it would be necessary and appropriate under the Constitution and applicable laws of the United States for the President to authorize the military to use lethal force within the territory of the United States. For example, the president could conceivably have no choice but to authorize the military to use such force if necessary to protect the homeland in the circumstances like a catastrophic attack like the ones suffered on December 7, 1941, and September 11, 2001.
It seems...curious...to invoke the bombing of Pearl Harbor as a situation in which drone attacks might be useful, particular given that the question was "about whether Americans could be targeted for lethal strikes on US soil." It was not USians who attacked Peal Harbor. USians of Japanese extraction were, however, detained in internment camps in the wake of the bombing, in one of the nation's many great shames against people of color. It is not reassuring to have that history invoked in defense of the hypothetical use of drones on US soil.

Open Wide...