MittMail: I DUNNO YOU GUYS Edition

A few months ago, my friend Mike Huntswieth (who happens to share an email account with me) joined the mailing list of current presidential candidate and presumable future Dancing With the Stars contestant Mitt Romney.

Over the weekend, I found this in my inbox. I immediately forwarded it to Liss, and we agreed that it was the greatest e-mail in the history of democracy. (Just kidding-- Citizens United!):


The screen capture of an e-mail from Mitt Romney. It starts with the subject line
[From: mitt@poop.fart
To: me
Subject: You tell me

[Picture of a large crowd in a place that has an Ohio flag]

Think we have momentum?

This is a time for real reform for a real recovery-- contribute today. [Oh shit, I forgot to configure my Victory Wallet!]

Thank you,
Mitt]

I love it when my friends send me e-mail at 2:47 on Saturday mornings!

Presumably fred.thompsonfarted@whitehouse.gov is also on Romney's mailing list:

President Obama holding a cell phone to his ear and making the best whoops! face ever
Oh, so now that clown wants to know what I think?

Open Wide...

Top Five

Here is your topic: Top Five Favorite Fictional Movies About Politics/Elections. (And although it could rightly be said that most movies have a politics of some sort, here I am specifically referring to governmental politics, so films like The Contender, Bob Roberts, The American President, Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, The Manchurian Candidate, Dave, Wag the Dog, etc.) Go!

Please feel welcome to share stories about why your Top Five picks are what they are, though a straight-up list is fine, too. Please refrain from negatively auditing other people's lists, because judgment discourages participation.

Open Wide...

Sure, Obama Could Win—But Only with Votes That Don't Really Count

[Content Note: Racism; misogyny.]

An actual passage from an article in Politico, filed under the headline "Lessons learned from 2012," in the "Democrats have a liberal problem" section of the piece:

If President Barack Obama wins, he will be the popular choice of Hispanics, African-Americans, single women and highly educated urban whites. That's what the polling has consistently shown in the final days of the campaign. It looks more likely than not that he will lose independents, and it's possible he will get a lower percentage of white voters than George W. Bush got of Hispanic voters in 2000.

A broad mandate this is not.
So, to recap: If President Obama wins among Hispanic voters, African American voters, educated urban whites, and single women (who are obviously a mutually exclusive group from the previous categories, ahem)—and, although not mentioned here, the President will win among LGBTQI voters, Asian American and Pacific Islander voters, and Native American voters—that is not a broad mandate. Because a voting base that is authentically diverse, i.e. broad, is just so much garbage without the credibility conferred by the more heavily weighted votes of straight, white, cis, married, rural, working class men.

The votes of the Real AmericansTM!

Or, as they were recently described by an official at TeamRomney in another Politico piece about how Chris Christie was almost Romney's veep pick: "ordinary white men."
"[Christie would have been] great anywhere there are ordinary white men," the official said. "They would have loved him because here's this straight-talking, hard-charging, in-your-face guy, and he's a man's man."
And you can't have a "broad mandate" without men's men.

Treating the votes of marginalized people like second-class votes that don't really count is not just a self-evidently gross reflection of the values of the kyriarchy: It's an insidious laying of the groundwork to delegitimize Obama's potential reelection.

Jamelle Bouie notes: "I expect Obama's low support among white voters to become a bullet point in the inevitable conservative case against his 'legitimacy' should he win. The usual suspects on the Right will argue, loudly, that a president who loses a majority of the white vote isn't a president who represents 'Americans,' narrowly defined."

When we hear conservatives express—vaguely, but with an angry certitude—that they find something "un-American" about President Barack Obama, it's not just about his being black. It's about the fact that he has made visible the collective power of a base that doesn't rely on straight white men. Which is a profound threat to their privilege.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of Suffragettes holding signs asking how long they should wait to get the vote

Hosted by Suffragettes.

Open Wide...

Sunday Shuffle

[Content Note for video: assassination, starvation, police brutality, racism, war]

Michael Jackson, Man in the Mirror

This is 25 years old and still relevant.

You?

Open Wide...

Open Thread


Hosted by a vintage Halloween decoration.
This week's open threads have been brought to you by Halloween things!

Open Wide...

Open Thread


Hosted by a For Sale sign.

Open Wide...

The Virtual Pub Is Open

image of a pub Photoshopped to be named 'The Potty Mouth Pub'
[Explanations: lol your fat. pathetic anger bread. hey your gay.]

TFIF, Shakers!

Belly up to the bar,
and name your poison!

Open Wide...

Awesome. Totally Awesome.

image of President Obama at a call center, holding a mobile phone to his ear and makes a whoopsface
[Click to embiggen.]

This amazing snap of Presidential Whoopsface care of The Daily What, which explains it is "an Associated Press photograph of President Obama on the phone at a campaign fundraiser event in Orlando, Florida. According to ABC News reporter Devin Dwyer, the photograph was taken right after Obama realized that he had called the wrong number, who was quoted as saying: 'Hi is this Ann? Hi, is this Ann? Oh, I'm sorry, I must have the wrong number.'"

This ranks just below the Presidential Nose-Wrinkle and just above Presidential Zuh?, according to my calculations.

Naturally, it is already a meme. This is amazing. See also.

Open Wide...

Tweet of the Day

Open Wide...

Photo of the Day

image of actor Robert Pattinson with amazing wizard hair and an incredible Lanvin black leather coat sporting all sorts of metal details
Robert Pattinson in a Lanvin jacket in the November issue of L'Uomo Vogue.

Mm, that jacket looks pretty practical, I guess.

I continue to be impressed and delighted by the awesomeness that is Robert Pattinson's hair. I can't even name all eight wonders of the world, but I bet at least six of them are less wondrous than his tremendous locks.

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

"Mitt Romney's fantasy that Senate Democrats will work with him to pass his 'severely conservative' agenda is laughable."—Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, promising to defend the middle- and lower classes "against Mitt Romney's Tea Party agenda," should the unthinkable happen and Wizard Emeritus of Statistics University Nate Silver's presidentus noromnus spell fail to prevent the unseating of President Barack Obama in next Tuesday's election.

(That's definitely how this election is going to work, right? Magical spells from statisticians? Close enough.)

Open Wide...

I Get Letters

[Content Note: Harassment; war on agency.]

On Tuesday, Shaker MB shared a very moving guest post here, which was framed as an open letter to Rep. Paul Ryan, addressing how his views and policies are not actually "pro-life" at all. I've gotten a few interesting, ahem, emails from anti-choicers about that post. I'm sure you'll be shocked to hear that anti-choicers don't like having their cavernous hypocrisy so carefully detailed.

Anyway. Late yesterday evening, I got another email about the post, which was a typical wall of text full of anti-choice garbage and conservative talking points, with some bonus ad hominem for MB and me.

screen cap of the email, with most of the text blurred out; all that remains is the parting shot: 'Get a real life, Melissa!!'

I decided to spare you the content of the missive from my delightful correspondent, save for hir supercool parting shot, because no one's life would have been improved by reading that mess of seething hatred, trust me.

Normally, I just delete these things because who cares. But I was in a pissy mood because Santorum Akin Walsh Mourdock Koster, and so fed up to the fucking teeth with the constant onslaught of aggressive, belligerent, ignorant, consent-hostile, agency-denying, anti-choice dogshit, that I decided to reply.

a screen cap of the original email plus my reply: 'You're a fucking asshole.'

This morning came the fiery retort in giant red text.

screen cap of email reading: 'And YOU are a potty-mouth, totally devoid of logic, common sense, thinking ability, and the vocabulary to use more than one-two sylable [sic] words!'

Sounds like someone's been talking to Bill Donohue!

As you can imagine, I decided that this carefully considered, thought-provoking critique of my faculties warranted a reply.

a screen cap of the original email plus my reply: 'You're a fucking asshole.'

A little while later, I received another dispatch from my correspondent, in even BIGGER red text.

screen cap of email reading: 'Obviously, you didn't hear me, so I repeat, louder this time: And YOU are a potty-mouth, totally devoid of logic, common sense, thinking ability, and the vocabulary to use more than one-two sylable [sic] words!'

Naturally, I sent a swift reply.

a screen cap of the original email plus my reply: 'You're a fucking asshole.'

My correspondent, evidently under the impression that colorblindness might be impeding the penetration of hir messages, replied in green.

screen cap of email reading: 'Ah-Ha!!  You have a

FACT CHECK! I do not have a "fucking asshole" key on computer. (Would that I did!) I also have a brain. I keep it safely in my brainpan for whenever I need it. Like when I need to compose replies to important emails.

a screen cap of the original email plus my reply: 'You're a fucking dipshit.'

I regret to report I have not heard back, but if there are any further developments in this modern answer to the Lincoln-Douglas debates, I will be sure to you update you with all due urgency.

Open Wide...

In The News

[Content note: racism, war, violence]

Assume Deer Dead:

Hey, finally, here is Romney's vision for America including his five point (☆) plan! If you thought it might be vague you were right! (Summation: points one-through-five: Romney will make everything better! (Neat!)) But he's definitely going to change the tax code. Good luck, America, you're gonna need it!

Mr. Burns endorses Mitt Romney obviously.

This is a really great map:


UnskewedPolls.com (LOLOLOLOL!!! LOLOLOL!!) is projecting a Romney landslide of McGovernian proportions next Tuesday. I don't think these guys like Nate Silver very much.

But! This website (it's just a really great website, by the way) says there is no way Romney can win. From your HTML to God's earbuds! So, instead of voting, everyone should pray for a Romney victory. Good plan! I endorse this idea! If you were going to vote for Mitt, don't bother, just stay home and pray.

Here are some really great interviews with Romney supporters in Ohio. Cameo by: Meat Load! (Typo and it stays.) These aren't low-information voters, they're wrong-information voters. Scary!

Related: The right wing (who've been trying to make hay of this for the last couple months) will definitely be unhappy to hear that the CIA saved countless lives in a secret mission to defend the Benghazi embassy.

The December issue of Vanity Fair will feature a previously unpublished six-page story by Truman Capote titled Yachts and Things. Merry fucking Krampus to me!

Speaking of: Need a Krampus sweater? Probably.

Juvenile justice they call it: Conditions in Ohio juvenile detention facilities remain unconstitutional and in violation of a federal court order.

Are you wondering what George W. Bush was up to this week? I know you were wondering. He was speaking at a closed-door investment conference in the Caymen Islands of course.

This weekend you should go down to your local Red Box and rent Theodore Rex.

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Dudley the Greyhound lying on the couch with a fleece blanket

The biggest baby. ♥

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime



Caleb and Saleem: "Baltimore"

Open Wide...

Friday Blogaround

This blogaround brought to you by potato chips.

Recommended Reading:

Trudy: Reproductive Freedom Has Always Been an Economic Issue [Content Note: The post at this link contains discussion of sexual violence and slavery.]

Lauren: The Misogyny Behind an Attempted Assassination of a Man in Congo [Content Note: The post at this link includes descriptions of violence and discussion of rape as a tool of war.]

Rebecca: This Brooklyn Teen Will Become the First Female African-American Chess Master, and She Is So Great!

Jon: Indiana Senate Race: Richard Mourdock Poll Numbers Collapse after Rape Comment

Susie: Class Divide

Steve: US Job Growth Accelerates, Exceeds Expectations

Andrew: New York Times Chides Nate Silver, Who Still Predicts An Obama Win

Charles: Mitt Romney Loses His Cool in an Interview about the Mormon Position on Abortion [video]

Spooky: The Delicate Gourd Carving Art of Marilyn Sunderland

Finally! Loren is a woodcarving enthusiast and recently carved a linocut print inspired by President Obama.

Leave your links and recommendations in comments...

Open Wide...

Random Nerd Nostalgia: Gobbled By Ghosts

Photobucket

[Image Description:Title" "Gobble the Power-Pellets or Get Gobbled by Ghosts!" A large image of a 3-d, fedora-clad Pac-Man, with legs, running away from ghosts. Accompanying text: "Yes, the ever-loveable, ever-ravenous PAC-MAN is back! If you remember the incredible excitement he generated, you're ready to relive the phenomenon. And if you missed him the first time around, you;re in for the most fun you ever had on the Nintendo Entertainment System!" A great deal more tiny text extols the fun of Pac-Man, while smaller screen illustrates the game.]

Scanned from Wonder Woman volume 2, #23, December 1988.

Open Wide...

Mitt Romney Is Terrible: A Retrospective

As we're coming down to the wire on this epic electoral battle between Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States of America, and Willard Mitt Romney, Future Vice President of the Losing to Barack Obama Club, I thought it would be a good time to take a look back at our journey with Mitt Romney, the Least Worstest of All the Republicans Who Ran This Time. And for all the undecided voters out there, may my photoshop skillz be your guide. Enjoy!


Video Description: A collection of my photoshopped images of Mitt Romney from the Republican primary through the general election, set to an instrumental version of Sarah McLachlan's "I Will Remember You."

True Fact: I have been working on this all morning and LAUGHING MY ASS OFF. Also? I couldn't even fit in all the images I had. This is like half of them, lol.

And how great is this?

screen cap of the video playing on YouTube, with content generated advertising for Mitt Romney's official site

That would be a screen cap of the video playing on YouTube, serving an ad for Mitt Romney's official site. Content generated advertising FTW!

Open Wide...

The Terrible Bargain We Have Regretfully Struck

I pretty regularly get requests for me to republish this piece, from, I suppose, people who came to it late and want to have the opportunity to discuss it since comments are closed on the original. In the past week, however, I've had three requests to republish it. I imagine that has something to do with the anxiety around the election we were discussing yesterday, and the friction it's causing among lots of feminist women with male friends, family, and/or colleagues. So, by request, here it is again.

[Content Note: Misogyny; rape culture; bullying.]

Despite feminists' reputation, and contra my own individual reputation cultivated over five years of public opinion-making, I am not a man-hater.

If I played by misogynists' rules, specifically the one that dictates it only takes one woman doing one Mean or Duplicitous or Disrespectful or Unlawful or otherwise Bad Thing to justify hatred of all women, I would have plenty of justification for hating men, if I were inclined to do that sort of thing.

Most of my threatening hate mail comes from men. The most unrelentingly trouble-making trolls have always been men. I've been cat-called and cow-called from moving vehicles countless times, and subjected to other forms of street harassment, and sexually harassed at work, always by men. I have been sexually assaulted—if one includes rape, attempted rape, unsolicited touching of breasts, buttocks, and/or genitals, nonconsensual frottage on public transportation, and flashing—by dozens of people during my lifetime, some known to me, some strangers, all men.

But I don't hate men, because I play by different rules. In fact, there are men in this world whom I love quite a lot.

There are also individual men in this world I would say I probably hate, or something close, men who I hold in unfathomable contempt, but it is not because they are men.

No, I don't hate men.

It would, however, be fair to say that I don't easily trust them.

My mistrust is not, as one might expect, primarily a result of the violent acts done on my body, nor the vicious humiliations done to my dignity. It is, instead, born of the multitude of mundane betrayals that mark my every relationship with a man—the casual rape joke, the use of a female slur, the careless demonization of the feminine in everyday conversation, the accusations of overreaction, the eyerolling and exasperated sighs in response to polite requests to please not use misogynist epithets in my presence or to please use non-gendered language ("humankind").

There are the insidious assumptions guiding our interactions—the supposition that I will regard being exceptionalized as a compliment ("you're not like those other women"), and the presumption that I am an ally against certain kinds of women. Surely, we're all in agreement that Britney Spears is a dirty slut who deserves nothing but a steady stream of misogynist vitriol whenever her name is mentioned, right? Always the subtle pressure to abandon my principles to trash this woman or that woman, as if I'll never twig to the reality that there's always a justification for unleashing the misogyny, for hating a woman in ways reserved only for women. I am exhorted to join in the cruel revelry, and when I refuse, suddenly the target is on my back. And so it goes.

There are the jokes about women, about wives, about mothers, about raising daughters, about female bosses. They are told in my presence by men who are meant to care about me, just to get a rise out of me, as though I am meant to find funny a reminder of my second-class status. I am meant to ignore that this is a bullying tactic, that the men telling these jokes derive their amusement specifically from knowing they upset me, piss me off, hurt me. They tell them and I can laugh, and they can thus feel superior, or I can not laugh, and they can thus feel superior. Heads they win, tails I lose. I am used as a prop in an ongoing game of patriarchal posturing, and then I am meant to believe it is true when some of the men who enjoy this sport, in which I am their pawn, tell me, "I love you." I love you, my daughter. I love you, my niece. I love you, my friend. I am meant to trust these words.

There are the occasions that men—intellectual men, clever men, engaged men—insist on playing devil's advocate, desirous of a debate on some aspect of feminist theory or reproductive rights or some other subject generally filed under the heading: Women's Issues. These intellectual, clever, engaged men want to endlessly probe my argument for weaknesses, want to wrestle over details, want to argue just for fun—and they wonder, these intellectual, clever, engaged men, why my voice keeps raising and why my face is flushed and why, after an hour of fighting my corner, hot tears burn the corners of my eyes. Why do you have to take this stuff so personally? ask the intellectual, clever, and engaged men, who have never considered that the content of the abstract exercise that's so much fun for them is the stuff of my life.

There is the perplexity at my fury that my life experience is not considered more relevant than the opinionated pronouncements of men who make a pastime of informal observation, like womanhood is an exotic locale which provides magnificent fodder for the amateur ethnographer. And there is the haughty dismissal of my assertion that being on the outside looking in doesn't make one more objective; it merely provides a different perspective.

There are the persistent, tiresome pronouncements of similitude between men's and women's experiences, the belligerent insistence that handsome men are objectified by women, too! that women pinch men's butts sometimes, too! that men are expected to look a certain way at work, too! that women rape, too! and other equivalencies that conveniently and stupidly ignore institutional inequities that mean X rarely equals Y. And there are the long-suffering groans that meet any attempt to contextualize sexism and refute the idea that such indignities, though grim they all may be, are not necessarily equally oppressive.

There are the stereotypes—oh, the abundant stereotypes!—about women, not me, of course, but other women, those women with their bad driving and their relentless shopping habits and their PMS and their disgusting vanity and their inability to stop talking and their disinterest in Important Things and their trying to trap men and their getting pregnant on purpose and their false rape accusations and their being bitches sluts whores cunts... And I am expected to nod in agreement, and I am nudged and admonished to agree. I am expected to say these things are not true of me, but are true of women (am I seceding from the union?); I am expected to put my stamp of token approval on the stereotypes. Yes, it's true. Between you and me, it's all true. That's what is wanted from me. Abdication of my principles and pride, in service to a patriarchal system that will only use my collusion to further subjugate me. This is a thing that is asked of me by men who purport to care for me.

There is the unwillingness to listen, a ferociously stubborn not getting it on so many things, so many important things. And the obdurate refusal to believe, to internalize, that my outrage is not manufactured and my injure not make-believe—an inflexible rejection of the possibility that my pain is authentic, in favor of the consolatory belief that I am angry because I'm a feminist (rather than the truth: that I'm a feminist because I'm angry).

And there is the denial about engaging in misogyny, even when it's evident, even when it's pointed out gently, softly, indulgently, carefully, with goodwill and the presumption that it was not intentional. There is the firm, fixed, unyielding denial—because it is better and easier to imply that I'm stupid or crazy, that I have imagined being insulted by someone about whom I care (just for the fun of it!), than it is to just admit a bloody mistake. Rather I am implied to be a hysteric than to say, simply, I'm sorry.

Not every man does all of these things, or even most of them, and certainly not all the time. But it only takes one, randomly and occasionally, exploding in a shower of cartoon stars like an unexpected punch in the nose, to send me staggering sideways, wondering what just happened.

Well. I certainly didn't see that coming...

These things, they are not the habits of deliberately, connivingly cruel men. They are, in fact, the habits of the men in this world I love quite a lot.

All of whom have given me reason to mistrust them, to use my distrust as a self-protection mechanism, as an essential tool to get through every day, because I never know when I might next get knocked off-kilter with something that puts me in the position, once again, of choosing between my dignity and the serenity of our relationship.

Swallow shit, or ruin the entire afternoon?

It can come out of nowhere, and usually does. Which leaves me mistrustful by both necessity and design. Not fearful; just resigned—and on my guard. More vulnerability than that allows for the possibility of wounds that do not heal. Wounds to our relationship, the sort of irreparable damage that leaves one unable to look in the eye someone that you loved once upon a time.

This, then, is the terrible bargain we have regretfully struck: Men are allowed the easy comfort of their unexamined privilege, but my regard will always be shot through with a steely, anxious bolt of caution.

A shitty bargain all around, really. But there it is.

There are men who will read this post and think, huffily, dismissively, that a person of color could write a post very much like this one about white people, about me. That's absolutely right. So could a lesbian, a gay man, a bisexual, an asexual. So could a trans or intersex person (which hardly makes a comprehensive list). I'm okay with that. I don't feel hated. I feel mistrusted—and I understand it; I respect it. It means, for me, I must be vigilant, must make myself trustworthy. Every day.

I hope those men will hear me when I say, again, I do not hate you. I mistrust you. You can tell yourselves that's a problem with me, some inherent flaw, some evidence that I am fucked up and broken and weird; you can choose to believe that the women in your lives are nothing like me.

Or you can be vigilant, can make yourselves trustworthy. Every day.

Just in case they're more like me than you think.

[This post was originally published August 14, 2009.]

Open Wide...