A Note

This has come up in comments a few times, as recently as yesterday, and it's evidenced again by my mixed reaction to President Obama's address last night, and it will probably be an increasing point of some interest as we get closer to Election Day, so let me just lay it out here.

I like and don't like President Obama. I like and don't like his presidency.

That's probably fairly evident to most of the regular readers around here. But there are also readers who fixate on the fact that I have a "The Third Term of George Bush Is Going Splendidly" tag as evidence I comprehensively hate President Obama, as well as readers who seize on my deep fondness for the Obama Family, or any positive reaction to his presidency at all, as evidence I undilutedly adore President Obama, as well as people who see both and accuse me of confounding inconsistency.

Frankly, I don't have an uncritical view of the President in either direction. I like a lot about him. I don't like a lot about him. I am willing and eager to write about both positions. That's not inconsistency; that's an acknowledgment of his complex humanity.

It's also an acknowledgement of my own.

* * *

Right before the last presidential election, I wrote that then-candidate Obama, and my constantly mixed feelings about his candidacy and policies, had taught me something important about how I view candidates:

[Obama's candidacy] has been, for me, a continuing lesson on what are and what are not mutually exclusive concepts. Being unthrilled about certain policy positions and tactics, sometimes unthrilled even to the point of feeling like we're taking a step backwards, and regarding his candidacy as yet a step forward in other ways, aren't mutually exclusive.

Reconciling that with my tendency to view candidates as either singularly Progressive or Not Progressive has been an important learning experience for me.

That's not a "lesser of two evils" argument; it's not a comment about compromise, or balance, or taking what we can get, either. It's about coexistence and complexity, and opening myself up to both in a way I haven't before—in no small part because I've never had the need nor the chance, offered as I've been prior to this election only straight, white, wealthy men who were symbols of nothing but social stagnation at the upper levels of our government.

For a long time, I wasn't quite sure how to work out what to make of this opportunity given to me, to see forward and backward and running in place so vividly all in the same candidate. (I certainly would have had the same problem if Clinton had ended up our nominee.) But moving into a space where I can simultaneously feel desperately excited about the forward, while feeling the usual disappointment and occasional fury about the same old and back, has been good. And liberating.

It feels like the first time you really understand how to keep loving someone even after you've seen their flaws.

It's almost like I'm a real grown-up or something.
Emphasis original. Forward. Heh.

All of those expressed sentiments are truer and more active parts of my thought now, four years later.

I hold in my head at the same time that President Obama supports policies that are detestable to me, especially with regard to foreign policy, and supports policies that are precious to me, especially with regard to domestic social justice. I hold in my head at the same time the thought that President Obama will sign off on drone strikes that kill children, and the thought expressed so beautifully last night by
Valérie:


And that says something about Barack Obama, the man and the president who has weathered incomprehensible levels of racist shit to be first.

Which of those am I supposed to disregard in order to wholly love or wholly hate President Barack Obama?

* * *

Those simultaneous thoughts say something about the Office of the President, too, which is suffused with American Exceptionalism no matter which party fills it. The flavors are slightly different, but they both leave a bitter taste in my mouth.

We drone children in other countries and talk incessantly of protecting children in this country (to justify all manner of policy, only some of which is actually good for children) because we are an empire with all the self-centered, self-indulgent fantasies of specialness—and its dark shadow of dangerous paranoia of threats to privilege—inherent to empire.

Barack Obama is not just a president; he is not even merely the President of the United States. He is The American President, the head of government and the head of state of a global empire that arrives on distant shores accompanied by the chant of "USA! USA!" whether its warriors are in battle gear or three-piece suits or red aprons.

He is also The American President, the figurehead of a diverse democratic nation, a melting pot, an experiment in pluralism that sometimes has gone amazingly right.

I recognize that many of the things that I like and don't like about President Obama and his presidency are really symbolic of things that I like and don't like about my country.

* * *

image of President Obama boarding Air Force One at twilight
President Barack Obama boards Air Force One at Bagram Air Field, Afghanistan, as he departs for Washington, D.C., May 1, 2012. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)
I recently said in comments: "Never in my life has a politician had the capacity to infuriate and delight me to extremes the way President Barack Obama has."

I stand by that. He makes me angry and he disappoints me. He inspires me and surprises me. He challenges me, he forces me to examine my beliefs, and he tests my principles.

I like him and I don't like him. I think he'd be good with that. I think he'd like and not like me, too.

Open Wide...

Number of the Day

93%: The percentage decrease in women's services in Shelby County, Tennessee, after local officials "stripped funding for Planned Parenthood and awarded it to a conservative religious clinic instead."

I don't even know what to say anymore.

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime




B-Movie: "Nowhere Girl"

Open Wide...

General DNC Thread

So we can leave this thread dedicated to President Obama's speech, here's a space to discuss the other goings-on at the DNC last night. Some of my favorite moments:


Video Description: Rep. Gabby Giffords takes the stage, accompanied by Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, to lead the Pledge of Allegiance. The audience goes absolutely wild. Her speech is still a bit slurred, and her right side still has some weakness, but she has made a remarkable recovery. So much blub.

Also! Former Republican Governor of Florida Charlie Crist rivals BrianWS in eyebrow acting [via]:

gif from Crist's speech showing his dramatic eyebrow action

gif from Crist's speech showing his dramatic eyebrow action

Thanks to Eastsidekate for the heads-up on that one. And thanks to Jessica for the heads-up on this:

gif of Michelle, Malia, and Sasha greeting Barack onstage after his speech

Well, that's pretty much the cutest thing ever. Wrap it up! We're done here.

Open Wide...

So the President Gave a Speech Last Night...



[Transcript here.]

It was a decent speech. Very slow to start, but it picked up at the end. The highlight, for me, was his comment on the Republicans' tiresome strategy of scapegoating and wedge politicking:
We don't think the government can solve all of our problems, but we don't think the government is the source of all of our problems any more than our welfare recipients or corporations or unions or immigrants or gays or any other group we're told to blame for our troubles because, America, we understand that this democracy is ours.

We, the people, recognize that we have responsibilities as well as rights; that our destinies are bound together; that a freedom which asks only what's in it for me, a freedom without a commitment to others, a freedom without love or charity or duty or patriotism, is unworthy of our founding ideals, and those who died in their defense.

As citizens, we understand that America is not about what can be done for us. It's about what can be done by us, together, through the hard and frustrating but necessary work of self-government. That's what we believe.
And even with that, I had a quibble: There are lots of people who make this country their home who aren't citizens. And I don't just mean migrant workers and undocumented immigrants—I mean people who reside here on all types of visas, most of whom are required to live here for long periods before they qualify for citizenship, if they ever qualify at all. I love the spirit of what he's saying, but, listen, I am married to an immigrant and I have friends who are immigrants who understood and appreciated and worked for this notion of national community more than Republicans ever will, even before they were citizens.

And, you know, I'm not saying that to be a jerk; I'm saying it because I believe our President genuinely believes those words, and I believe he might value thoughts on how they could be even more inclusive.

I was extremely pleased with his use of female and male pronouns last night, too. That was very meaningful.

I was less pleased that reproductive rights did not even merit a single complete sentence of its own. Its only mention was a clause, here:
If you give up on the idea that your voice can make a difference, then other voices will fill the void, the lobbyists and special interests, the people with the $10 million checks who are trying to buy this election and those who are trying to make it harder for you to vote, Washington politicians who want to decide who you can marry or control health care choices that women should be making for themselves.
What I wanted to hear from my President last night was an affirmation of his personal support for the idea that my body is my own. I did not want to hear a reference to my right to make healthcare choices for myself stuck at the end of a sentence that is essentially a gussied-up version of the same old refrain: If you don't vote for us, you'll lose your reproductive rights.

What I did not hear was my President saying, unequivocally, that he supports women's right to choice because that is the right thing to do. A big opportunity, and a big miss. I expect more.

What did you think?

Open Wide...

Open Thread

A box of

Hosted by Fruit Brute.

Open Wide...

Open DNC Thread

image of hands raised holding 'Forward' signs at an Obama campaign event

Tonight, President Obama will officially accept the Democratic nomination for the US presidency, which will be the closing address of the convention. There's lots of other stuff going on tonight, too, so here's a thread for discussion. Enjoy!

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Suggested by Shaker KarateMonkey and originally run August 13, 2009: "Let's play I never: What's something you've never done that most people around you have, or what common experience have you missed out on? For example to the best of my recollection I've never had a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. My wife [RedSonja] thinks that's very weird. My parents didn't really like them so we never had them growing up, and by the time I was old enough to realize that was kind of rare I already had a good streak going, and didn't see any reason to break it."

I've never seen The Sound of Music.

Open Wide...

Parks and Rec Blooper Reel


Video Description: Lots of scenes from Parks and Recreation that get messed up in hilarious ways. I have tried to do a transcript for this, but I am incapable of conveying the comedy of bloopers through the written word. It was just so much "Rashida sneezes; Amy laughs; everyone laughs! Then Audrey does a funny dog voice! Everyone laughs!" Just repeat that 1,000 times, and that's what a transcript would be. I'm sorry!

[H/T to everyone in the multiverse, and my sincere gratitude to each and every one of you.]

Open Wide...

About the DNC, Three Concerns

1. Poverty. Earlier today, on Twitter, Jessica noted her frustration that there was precious little meaningful discussion about poverty at the Democratic National Convention. Yes, of course, lots of lipservice to uplifting people, and vague references to "people in need," and all that, but there isn't anyone really talking about poverty, no one who's really angry about it, an overwhelming absence of the details and nuances of poverty—the food insecurity, the housing insecurity, the chronic unwellness, the incredible stress on families, how goddamn hard it can be just to get a bath.

These are things that people are experiencing in the richest country in the world.

Of course the Republicans are not going to talk about poverty. But the Democrats aren't, either. And if they don't, who will?

I said to Jess that the main reason I supported John Edwards (whoops!) was because he spoke eloquently about poverty. He's a d-bag and a half, a real piece of shit who lectured me over the phone about the morality of using naughty words while he was cheating on his wife, but his rhetoric about the Two Americas was everything. He did a lot of unforgivable things, and among them was failing to fulfill the promise of being a much-needed leader on poverty/class.

No one has stepped in to fill the void he left.

Or, rather, no one who speaks as passionately on poverty/class has been invited to say it onstage during DNC primetime.

And the Democrats don't seem all that bothered by the absence. Which is a problem of the Democrats having increasingly adopted corporate-friendly strategies to compete with Republicans, who have long been a wholly-owned subsidiary of Corporate America.

It's impossible to talk about the real sources and real solutions of entrenched poverty in the US without offending corporate sponsors.

* * *

2. Reproductive Rights. Does the DNC know that reproductive rights matter to people other than white women? I'm not sure they do.

Also! Here's a thing about inclusivity: Women shouldn't only be invited to speak about "women's issues." The Democrats have started to get that. But! Women also shouldn't be the only ones speaking about "women's issues." The Democrats still haven't seemed to figure that one out yet.

This DNC still has the appearance of outsourcing "women's issues" to women, as if they are "specialty" issues, as if reproductive rights (which, hello, affect fertile cis men who fuck people who can get pregnant, too) are some sort of "identity politics." (Eww! Grody!) It's appalling that the majority of men who are vocally and visibly engaged in the reproductive rights debate are anti-choice.

The President's speech is tonight. I truly hope he has finally considered the many ways in which treating the feminist/womanist fight for reproductive rights as "woman's work" is some fucked-up irony, and is fixing to be a vocal ally to pro-choice people tonight.

I would like to hear him affirm his personal support for the idea that my body is my own.

* * *

3. Higher education. This is something both Eastsidekate and I have written about before, but I feel obliged to reiterate my dismay about the focus on "getting a college degree," especially within the frame that a degree is some sort of magical pass into a stable full-time job with benefits and a livable wage.

Fifty percent (!!!) of young college graduates in the US are either un- or underemployed. Many of them leave college with crushing debt acquired while funding that education. And yet, at the DNC (and also at the RNC), there are no qualifications about urging young people (and unemployed people) to pursue education as the surest pathway to professional success.

Please don't misunderstand: I firmly believe that everyone who wants to go to university, or trade school, should be able to do so, affordably. Access to higher education should not be determined by privilege.

I am simply taking issue with the idea that we need to keep talking about (extremely expensive) higher education as some sort of solution to US employment problems while diligently ignoring that our economy is a house of cards, the population has gone lopsided as Baby Boomers age, there just aren't enough jobs anymore, and there's a cavernous class divide facilitated by middle class-destroying economic policies that are promoted by politicians in both parties even as they propose individual solutions on how to get and stay in the middle class.

Individual solutions to systemic problems don't work, and telling young people to get an education at any cost, when the cost demonstrably includes for many of them fucking their adult lives before they've even started, is an individual solution to a systemic problem that's about trade policies, taxation, demographics, domestic spending priorities, and a whole host of other lumbering national issues over which an entire generation of young people has no control, no less any one individual young person.

I expect the Republicans to elide these realities. But the Democrats really ought to do better. The "buy yourself an education" narrative is quickly becoming as vacuous and implicitly victim-blaming as "pull yourself up by the bootstraps." Boo.

Open Wide...

Random YouTubery

Would you like to see a movie of a guy taking a picture of himself every day for twelve and a half years? Here is a movie of a guy taking a picture of himself every day for twelve and a half years. Spoiler Alert: He turns into Zach Galifianakis.


Video Description: Photographer Noah Kalina, a young white man, takes a picture of his face and shoulders from approximately the same angle every day for 12.5 years. The result is essentially watching him age 12.5 years in less than 8 minutes.

[Via.]

Open Wide...

In The News

[Content note for racism]

Know who's awesome? Dr. Melissa Harris-Perry is awesome. #Nerdland

Hollywood took a giant shit all over one of the best-loved Christmas movies of all time. Coming soon: Christmas Story 2. For real.

Rush Limbaugh is still gross. (Also, what's up with his sponsors? Have they returned? Anyone know?)

Four transgender women, each of whom had very different experiences of prostitution and the transition to living as a woman, share their stories.

Did you hear about the Washington State Coalition Against Domestic Violence's annual conference? It's got some awesome guests lined up. Check it out!

Today in robotic exoskeleton news: Paralympian to use technologically advanced suit at home.

McDonald's will open outlets serving all-vegetarian menus for the first time at two of India's most-visited pilgrimage sites.

How Orgasms Work, in Less Than 3 Minutes. Watch it multiple times, if you can.

For orangutans, playing with iPad apps appears to be as popular among the apes as it is with humans.

Grindr wants you to vote. Sure, they probably want you to vote Republican, but they still want you to vote. (As was pointed out in comments, Manhunt is run by a Republican, not Grindr. Sorry, Grindr! I don't use either one; I do my tricking the old fashioned way: shakin' my ass on the dancefloor!)

Open Wide...

Random Nerd Nostalgia: Wonder Woman is a Commie

[Content Note: use of "man" for "human," physical restraint.]

Photobucket

[Image description: Narrative: "Holding the dictator by one hand, with the other she writes in solid stone..." Wonder Woman holds a white man with a goatee and moustache by his clothing, forcing him to look at a wall where she is writing thins in stone with her nail. Her list of commands reads: "Treat your neighbor as YOU would be treated! A job for EVERY man! No laws that aid only the RICH!" Wonder Woman, smiling, warns the man : "And if you don't obey them--I'll be back!" He answers: "I will! I will!"]

She was immediately denounced by FOX News for waging class warfare, natch.

Open Wide...

You Know What's Weird?

How little I actually give a shit about Mitt Romney.

He is such the proverbial empty suit, such a perfect, sterile, comprehensively uncluttered vessel for pure Republican policy, left undiluted and uncomplicated by even the merest semblance of a fervent and uncompromising personal opinion, that I don't even feel any of the animus I felt toward George W. Bush, or even John McCain.

The media keeps talking about the need for Republicans to "humanize" Mitt Romney, but I can't imagine that anyone really cares, including his supporters. The Republican ticket is all about efficacious conduits for unadulterated corporate conservatism. The less humanity in the way of their precise, heartless agenda, the better.

I have nothing but seething contempt for the message. The anodyne messenger lost my interest long ago. I can't even be arsed to hate him.

super boring picture of Mitt Romney on the campaign trail

Wev.

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

Dudley the Greyhound sitting on the couch, looking at me with one ear up

"What?"

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime



The Presidents of the United States of America: "Lump"

Open Wide...

Top Five

Here is your topic: Top Five Best Speeches You've Ever Seen/Heard/Read. You don't have to have experienced them in person (e.g. MLK's "I Have a Dream" speech counts if you've only seen it on video), and they can be speeches of any sort—political addresses, TED Talks, academic presentations, sermons, award acceptance speeches, commencement addresses, whatever. Go!

Please feel welcome to share stories about why your Top Five picks are what they are, though a straight-up list is fine, too. Please refrain from negatively auditing other people's lists, because judgment discourages participation.

Open Wide...

Lies and the Lying Liars...

Paul Ryan holding up a booklet which I have retitled 'I Was the 1st Man on Mars, by Paul Ryan'

In case you hadn't heard, Republican Veep Nominee Paul Ryan is a huge liar.

Open Wide...

So the President Gave a Speech Last Night...

Not that President. This one:


[Transcript here.]

There was a lot—A LOT—of good stuff in President Clinton's speech last night. So many soundbite-ready lines. So many riffs off-script. So much hilariously humiliating contempt for the Republican Party. But my absolute favorite line of the speech had to be this one:
Now, people ask me all the time how we got four surplus budgets in a row. What new ideas did we bring to Washington? I always give a one-word answer: Arithmetic!
Ha!

Another favorite moment of the speech was when President Clinton mentioned his wife, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and the cameras cut to First Lady Michelle Obama, leading a standing ovation for Hillary. I really hope after that, and this—

image of Bill Clinton and Barack Obama hugging onstage after Clinton's speech

—we can put to bed the tiresome narratives about how the Obamas and Clintons hate each other. They might not be best friends, and they may never be, but they are clearly strong political allies who respect one another and know how to work effectively together, and the reductive gradeschool nattering about whether they're besties elides the powerful narrative of alliance despite differences, which is a centerpiece of the Democratic Party, its diplomatic approach, its diversity, its commitment to consensus, and its rejection of obstructionism.

It is a flawed party, but it also a party that is fundamentally more decent in every conceivable way than its primary opposition, as their respective conventions have made abundantly clear. And nothing more emblematically illustrates what's right with the Democratic Party than the Obamas and the Clintons.

And speaking of good stuff, Elizabeth Warren gave a speech last night, too:


[Transcript here.]

Other stuff from the DNC last night:

Gabrielle Douglas leads the Pledge of Allegiance.

Pelosi!

AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka on rebuilding the middle class.

Cristina Saralegui, host of the Spanish-language show, Cristina, aka the Cuban Oprah, on dreamers and the choice before Latin@s in this election.

Finally! Here is a State Department photo of Hillary Clinton watching Bill's speech last night from East Timor.

image of Hillary Clinton watching the speech on a small TV in an office

Talk about these things! Or don't. Whatever makes you happy. Life is short.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

A box of Quisp, showing Quisp, a propellor-headed alien.

Hosted by Quisp.

Open Wide...