Photo of the Day

diverse group of kids sitting together in a tight group of chairs onstage, celebrating
Spelling Bee contestant Lena Greenberg (left) of Philadelphia celebrates with fellow competitors after she correctly spelled her word during round 6 of the 84th annual Scripps National Spelling Bee competition May 31, 2012 at the Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center in National Harbor, Maryland. Nine spellers, including Greenberg, have advanced to compete in the final of the competition. [Getty Images]

Open Wide...

Well, At Least Her Conscience Is Okay

[Content Note: Rape culture; anti-choice medical abuse.]

Annie-Rose at Think Progress: Oklahoma Doctor Refuses to Provide Rape Victim with Emergency Contraception.

An Oklahoma emergency room doctor refused to provide emergency contraception to a 24-year-old female rape victim because the medication violated the health provider's personal beliefs, a local CBS News affiliate reports. The hospital also denied the victim a rape kit, noting that it had no appropriate nurse on staff to administer the test.

"I will not give you emergency contraceptives because it goes against my beliefs," the doctor allegedly told the rape victim and her mother, Rhonda. "She knew my daughter had just been raped. Her attitude was so judgmental and I felt that she was just judging my daughter," Rhonda told the news station.
All perfectly legal, because Oklahoma law "shields providers from offering the perfectly legal medication under a 'conscience clause' which could significantly hinder women's [and other people's] access to contraception services."

The young woman eventually got the emergency contraception and a rape kit at another hospital.

I don't even know what else to say than this: If you seriously believe that your "conscience" is more important than providing healthcare to a rape victim, you are a failure as a doctor and an asshole as a person, and you need to find another job. That's it and that's all.

Open Wide...

Film Corner!

Below is the trailer for the major motion picture event, The Expendables 2, which is literally the best film trailer I have ever seen. "Literally?"—You. Yes, literally. And I don't mean that in a figurative way! Whoever put together this trailer should be promoted, given a raise, bestowed with all the awards for trailer-making, and gifted a permanent guest room in Sylvester Stallone's home, overlooking the commissioned bronze statue of Sylvester Stallone.

(True Fact: I read about that statue in a Nov. 1997 issue of Architectural Digest, and I still remember it! Good job, Sylvester Stallone!)

ANYWAY. What I was saying is that this trailer is a straight-up work of pure genius, but you don't have to take my word for it! Let's watch it! Or read my paraphrase of it!

"Barney Ross," hisses Bruce Willis as he walks into some sort of submarine prison (?) in which Barney "Sylvester Stallone" Ross has been interred since the last time he saved the world, for which he was obviously severely punished, because the US hates heroes. "You made me a deal," Bruce Willis continues, as Sly stands up and gives max poutface. "I coulda put you in the deepest, darkest hole, but I kept you here, because I knew that one day would come where you were gonna pay me back, and today is that day." Sly looks...rueful? I guess.

Great exposition. Very naturally delivered. Professional acting.

Now comes the very elaborate Expendables 2 logo, which is a shiny silver skull leaning backwards, and then two daggers whose handles form the Roman numeral II slam into its eye sockets, then they get absorbed into the skull as it tilts forward, and the blades shoot out the sides of the skull, followed by an array of other shiny weaponry that forms wings on either side of the skull. I'm describing this in so much detail because it takes up nine seconds of a one-minute trailer.

STALLONE says glowing gold text onscreen, followed by a half-second clip from the movie of Sylvester Stallone pointing a gun.

STATHAM says glowing gold text onscreen, followed by a half-second clip from the movie of Jason Statham aiming the gun on a tank.

LI says glowing gold text onscreen, followed by a half-second clip from the movie of Jet Li looking at something.

LUNDGREN says glowing gold text onscreen, followed by a half-second clip from the movie of Dolph Lundgren peeking around a pillar with a machine gun.

NORRIS says glowing gold text onscreen, followed by a half-second clip from the movie of Chuck Norris walking through rubble and removing his shades.

CREWS says glowing gold text onscreen, followed by a half-second clip from the movie of Terry Crews holding a machine gun.

COUTURE says glowing gold text onscreen, followed by a half-second clip from the movie of Randy Couture walking.

HEMSWORTH says glowing gold text onscreen, followed by a half-second clip from the movie of Liam Hemsworth (whoooops!) looking up from the sight of a rifle.

ALSO VAN DAMME says glowing gold text onscreen, followed by a half-second clip from the movie of Jean-Claude Van Damme holding a rocket launcher (or something).

WITH WILLIS says glowing gold text onscreen, followed by a half-second clip from the movie of Bruce Willis lowering a machine gun.

AND SCHWARZENEGGER says glowing gold text onscreen, followed by a three-quarter-second clip from the movie of Arnold Schwarzenegger firing a machine gun.

Text Onscreen: TheExpendables2Film.com. Summer 2012.
Now, I realize you might be thinking: That is not a perfect trailer. That trailer makes me think this movie has no plot and is just about a bunch of mostly-white muscle dudes running around blowing shit up. Plus Jet Li.

Well. I have seen The Expendables, because Iain McEwan, and if this sequel honors the original AS I'M SURE IT DEFINITELY DOES, then this trailer conveying that premise to you is what they call in show business "a success."

Please join me in hoping that this film is a box office smash, thus guaranteeing a part three and HOPEFULLY FINGERS CROSSED a role for Steven Seagal, who I cannot believe has been left out of this amazing franchise.

Open Wide...

BushQuotes!

Chapter 4, page 46: "I took my classes seriously and worked hard. ... And I made friends and played hard. The students at Yale came from all different backgrounds and all parts of the country. Within months, I knew many of them."

Welp, we've finally made it to Chapter Four, Privilege and Balls and Yale "Yale and the National Guard." Exciting stuff! I can't wait to hear George W. Bush talk even more about how popular, likeable, hardworking, and generally awesome he is.

Nicknames for everyone!

[From George Bush's A Charge to Keep, gifted to me by Deeky, because he hates me. In the US, all people who plan to run for president write a shitty book. (Some are less shitty than others, by which I mean the Democrats' books.) A Charge to Keep was George W. Bush's shitty I-wanna-be-president book, published in 1999. I am blogging one random quote per page every day until I have either made my way through the book or lost it behind a couch.]

Open Wide...

Number of the Day

Zero: What the effective tax rate should be on corporations, according to Honeywell CEO David Cote.

LOL. Sure.

Cote, as you may recall, was part of President Obama's Catfood Commission Bowles-Simpson Deficit Commission, because no one looks out for the US people better than our corporate overlords.

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

The Adventures of Watch Dog and Not-Watch Dog, Part 6:


Video Description: Zelly the Black-and-Tan Mutt stands alertly in the garden on a sunny day, looking around. She leans down and sniffs the grass, catches a scent, and begins to follow it. As she walks away, she reveals Dudley the Greyhound lying in the grass on his side, his ears flopped forward goofily. He lifts his eyes to look at her, then blinks from the bright sunlight. Fin.

image of Zelda sitting alertly on our ottoman
Watch Dog.

image of Dudley lying on his back on the couch, looking silly
Not-Watch Dog.

[Parts One, Two, Three, Four, Five.]

Open Wide...

DOMA Ruled Unconstitutional (Again)

Last year, President Obama instructed the Justice Department to cease defending the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in court.

In February, the US District Court for the Northern District of California ruled that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act, the federal definition of marriage, is unconstitutional.

Today, the 1st US Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston ruled "that the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutionally denies federal benefits to married gay couples, a groundbreaking ruling all but certain to wind up before the US Supreme Court. In its unanimous decision, the three-judge panel of the 1st US Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston said the 1996 law that defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman deprives gay couples of the rights and privileges granted to heterosexual couples."

The dominoes are falling. DOMA's days are numbered.

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

"Make no mistake, this battle is about self-determination by women of the direction and course of their lives and their family's lives. Abortion is about women's hopes and dreams. Abortion is a matter of survival for women."—Dr. George Tiller.

The Abortion Gang is collecting posts memorializing Dr. Tiller on the third anniversary of his murder. Stop by and check it out.

Open Wide...

I Write Letters

[Content Note: Anti-choice terrorism; violence.]

Dear President Obama:

Today marks three years since Dr. George Tiller, a reproductive rights advocate and one of the precious few physicians in the country who performed lifesaving late-term abortions, was murdered at his church.

The day after his murder, I wrote you a letter, begging you to "stop relying on dangerously dishonest rhetoric about abortion, its supporters, and its opponents," and to stop drawing an equivalency between the pro-choice and "pro-life" positions, as if both sides have an equally valid point, and as if activists who defend reproductive rights and activists who seek to subvert them are somehow two sides of the same coin.

Since that time, the Republican Party has, on both the state and federal levels, endeavored to undermine access to abortion, to contraception, and even to woman-centered healthcare providers. A record number of anti-abortion restrictions were enacted across the nation last year, at least one in every single state legislature. More than half of the state legislatures have considered restrictions on private health insurance plans to disallow them from paying for abortions. At least one state legislator has suggested that women should have to bear the cost of a separate insurance policy in case of needing an abortion in the event of being raped.

All of this has been done under the auspices of "valuing life," despite the fact that forcing a person to carry to term an unwanted or unviable pregnancy against hir will is the opposite of a respect for life, if the definition of "life" is to have any meaning at all.

Last week, a second suspicious fire broke out in a reproductive clinic in Georgia, and, this week, a women's health clinic in New Orleans was burned to the ground by an arsonist. These are only the latest examples of anti-choice terrorist acts in this nation, and they didn't happen in a void. They happened in a political climate in which it is considered an acceptable position to value a blastocyst over a living, breathing, sentient, existent human being.

They happened in a country in which every state legislature, and the national Congress, are trying to find ways to limit access to abortion—and in which our ostensibly pro-choice president remains silent on that matter. Except, of course, when you're bragging about ceding ground to anti-choicers to pass legislation, while insisting it's "not an abortion bill."

They happened in a country in which we are expected to trade everything away, including our civil liberties, in exchange for protection from the existential threat of nebulous foreign terrorists, but in which one of the most brazen, unapologetic terrorist campaigns in America, its co-ordination and orchestration frequently done right out in the open—at meetings, on websites, in email alerts—and potentially affecting the lives of more than half the population, is ignored by one party and mainstreamed as a central plank of its party platform by the other.

Mr. President, the vicious murder of Dr. Tiller was an act of terrorism committed by a terrorist. It should have been a wake-up call to this nation, and to you, to acknowledge the ugly reality that the anti-choice movement is a serious domestic threat.

Instead, the anti-choice movement has gained momentum with the unilateral support of the Republican Party, turning what was once a radical fringe movement into nothing less than state-sponsored terrorism, in defense of an inherently violent ideology.

And in response to this onslaught of violently misogynist activity by people who seek to rob people with uteri of their agency, their bodily autonomy, their right of self-determination, their access to a legal medical procedure, their ability to do that most basic of life management in the modern world—control their reproduction—your party has been all but silent.

Mr. President, you have failed to give an address centering reproductive rights, failed to give even a passing mention to reproductive rights in your "Women's Equality Day" proclamation, failed to give even a passing mention to reproductive rights in your "Women's History Month" proclamation, failed to acknowledge this war on agency in your State of the Union address, failed to prioritize science over religion, failed to prioritize healthcare over religion, and failed to be generally clueful on the issue of reproductive rights.

You are failing us.

Two years ago, I told you I was crying because I was sad and scared and angry. Today, sir, I cry because you have allowed Dr. Tiller's murder to happen in vain.

With colossal contempt,
Melissa McEwan

P.S. I will keep writing this letter every year, as long as I have to.

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime



Matt Nathanson: "Come On Get Higher"

Open Wide...

The Tyranny of OH HELL IT BURNS: 2. PRAGMATISM

Fun fact: Jonah Goldberg likes to start every chapter with a quote or two. Well, when in Waldenbooks...

Part of his trick was being an absolutely terrible writer (a trick countless postmodern academics figured out an emulated). With considerable effort he could manage to be merely dry and boring. But his more substantial philosophical prose reads like a bunch of German words were dipped in maple syrup and dragged across a linty floor before being badly translated back into English by someone with a less firm grasp of idiom. - Jonah Goldberg, explaining why John Dewey is a conniving asshole
He [Marx] explains it here, but reading the passage will only give you a headache. - Jonah Goldberg, explaining why I won't understand the English translation of a passage by Karl Marx
Now when it comes to enlightenments I've long followed the rule of the dad in So I Married an Axe Murderer:  "If it's not Scottish, it's crap." By this I mean that a conservative in the Anglo-American tradition tends to revere folks like Adam Smith and John Locke and, of course, Edmund Burke (only one of who was in fact Scottish) while looking askance at the events on the continent because of the whole French Revolution, the birth of totalitarianism, the debut of socialism, the Terror, and all of that unpleasantness. - Jonah Goldberg, explaining
Mr. Gorbachev, tear down these commas!

By the way, if guessed how many pages into the chapter Goldberg would make his first reference to Nazis, you lost (sort of)! Better luck next chapter! [Spoiler alert: chapter three is only seven pages long, so be sure to choose a low number.]

Here's one last game. Can you guess what the following people have in common?
John Kenneth Galbraith
Napoleon Bonaparte
Adam Smith
John Locke
Edmund Burke
Jean-Baptiste Say
Antoine Louis Claude Destutt, comte de Tracy ("another guy with an absurdly French name")
Robespierre
Thomas Jefferson
John Adams
Historian [sic] John B. Thompson
William James
Charles S. Pierce
Ralph Waldo Emerson
Hegel
Nietzsche
Otto Von Bismarck
Bertrand Russell
Karl Marx
Hannah Arendt (I know, right?)
Richard Rorty ("one of the left's star philosophers", although PROTIP: if you have to point it out to readers, you've probably overstated things.)
George Carlin
Historian Eric Goldman (who really was historian, and not a sociologist, the latter being something completely different :cough: John B. Thompson :cough:)
Woodrow Wilson
Jane Addams (two!)
Walter Rauschenbusch ("the leading proselytizer of the progressive social gospel movement")
John Dewey
Franklin Roosevelt
General Hugh "Iron Pants" Johnson ("an ironic nickname when you consider what "Hugh Johnson" sounds like when you say it fast") (Mr. Gorbachev, what the fuck is an adverb?)
Benito Mussolini
Paul Krugman
Lawrence Summers
John F. Kennedy
Lyndon Johnson (also funny, because it ends in Johnson)
Jimmy Carter (who told the nation something or other "while wearing a fetching sweater." [Johnson. titter.])
Thomas Friedman
Harvard economist Ken Rogoff
Arthur Herman
Robert Higgs
Robert Barro
President Obama
Harvard's James Kloppenberg
Horace Kallen
Stuart Chase
Friedrich Hayek
John Maynard Keynes
Tiffany Miller Jones (three!)
Norman Thomas
Herbert Croly
Martin Perez
E. J. Dionne
Michael Tomasky
William Voegeli
Charles Beard
J. Allen Smith

If you surmised that these are all people whose names Goldberg drops during this twenty page chapter, congrats!

HOLY SHIT YOU GUYS, THAT'S NEARLY THREE PEOPLE PER PAGE. DON'T FUCK WITH GOLDBERG, HE'S AN INTELLECTUAL WHO READS BOOKS. (ALSO: JOHNSON)

(ALSO ALSO: THIS IS NEARLY TWICE AS MANY GUYS AS THERE ARE REFERENCES IN THE CHAPTER.)

I'm not going to lie, and I'm not going to engage in hyperbole. This was possibly one of the worst chapters of any book I've ever read, and I've read The Fountainhead. I'm a something of a fan of history, scholarship, and what have you. I have B.A. in The History and Philosophy of Science. Also, I have a Ph.D. in whatever.

I've read a lot of history. I've read a lot of philosophy. I've found some of it quite good, in that it was entertaining and/or put forth a compelling argument. I thought some of it was bland. Some of it was garbage, in that it was a pointless recitation of information. Goldberg reminded me of the latter, only without all that pesky information. Even by the tepid standards of pseudo-intellectual garbage, Goldberg is a spectacular failure.

Goldberg is nothing if not that student who gets an F on his first term paper, only to whine to his professor that he totally copied down a lot of important names, and that college is a big waste of time, and also that his dad is totally going to call you and tell you why you should give him an A if you want to keep your job. Sorry, I just had to get that off my chest. (Also: Chest!)

Mr. Goldberg: Do stick to your day job of yelling random insults at people in cars. It's not as glamorous as pretending to be an intellectual, but I hear the Tribune Company has deep pockets.

But I digress. Let me get to the content of chapter two. I'd hate to write another 800 words without saying anything of import. :cough:

Goldberg starts out with a five page explanation of how Napoleon was kind of an asshole. He doesn't actually say as much, but he implies it. Don't worry, he's saving up his boldness for later in the chapter.

The idea (as it were), is that Napoleon was the first person to make ideology a bad word. IIRC, Napoleon did so au francais, but whatever. Cognates exist and liberals love the French.

I guess this whole ideology thing has to do with the last chapter (IDEOLOGY). I'm not sure. Goldberg never really gets into that.

Anyhow, Goldberg's really hot about how Napoleon was a pragmatist, in the most philosophical sense of the word. If you haven't heard about pragmatism, don't worry, neither has Goldberg.

PROTIP! If you're going to talk shit about a school of philosophy, it is useful to begin by defining the philosophy in question. Failing to do so makes you look like an asshole. Also on the just sayin' trail: neither Napoleon or Marx were, AFAIK, pragmatists.

Liberals (by which Goldberg means the philosophers Karl Marx and William James) were big into pragmatism, which is pragmatic in that it insists that it's scientifically objective and that anyone who dares argue with it is a bigot or some such shit. That's totally what pragmatism is, totally what liberals (like Karl Marx) believe, and actually the bulk of the first half of this chapter.

The next section I SWEAR TO REAGAN I AM NOT MAKING THIS UP is about how liberals (like William James) are constantly using war analogies to make their point. War on poverty. War on drugs. War on terror. You get the idea. Without their war metaphors, liberals having nothing to back up their arguments.

Also, this is neat, liberals are war mongers, because Paul Krugman once claimed that World War II lifted us out of the Great Depression but that theory's totally been destroyed citation needed.

The remainder of the chapter is about John Dewey, and how all the liberals these days can't stop talking about him.

(Goldberg could have talked about how Tip O'Neill used to snort coke of Eugene Debs' corpse, but that wouldn't have been as effective an argument. First off, some of his readers might actually know who Debs was, and realize that maybe just maybe the whole Marxist-Socialist-Democrat false equivalency thing he's got going on is something of an overstatement. Second, Dewey was a philosopher, which allows Goldberg to pretend that even though liberals [you know, like Andrew Sullivan] claim to not be Reds, they're philosophically committed to the same ideals.)

If you're like me (FETCHING SWEATER), you're wondering how the hell Goldberg is going to tie all these ideas words together. Napoleon hates "ideologues." Marx is a stuck-up science worshiper. John Dewey, the socialist, provided the intellectual foundation of the democratic party.

"[John Dewey] never voted for FDR when Norman Thomas, the Socialist Party of America candidate [extraneous comma] was on the ballot."

That's some through the looking glass shit right there my friends.

Open Wide...

Blame the Fatties

[Content Note: Food policing; fat hatred.]

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg is at it again: New York Plans to Ban Sale of Big Sizes of Sugary Drinks.

New York City plans to enact a far-reaching ban on the sale of large sodas and other sugary drinks at restaurants, movie theaters and street carts, in the most ambitious effort yet by the Bloomberg administration to combat rising obesity.

The proposed ban would affect virtually the entire menu of popular sugary drinks found in delis, fast-food franchises and even sports arenas, from energy drinks to pre-sweetened iced teas. The sale of any cup or bottle of sweetened drink larger than 16 fluid ounces — about the size of a medium coffee, and smaller than a common soda bottle — would be prohibited under the first-in-the-nation plan, which could take effect as soon as next March.

The measure would not apply to diet sodas, fruit juices, dairy-based drinks like milkshakes, or alcoholic beverages; it would not extend to beverages sold in grocery or convenience stores.

"Obesity is a nationwide problem, and all over the United States, public health officials are wringing their hands saying, 'Oh, this is terrible,'" Mr. Bloomberg said in an interview on Wednesday in the Governor's Room at City Hall.

"New York City is not about wringing your hands; it's about doing something," he said.
Even if that something is total garbage.

Then again, if your actual objective isn't public health but shaming and demonizing fat people, the plan is already a HUGE SUCCESS!

I could not be any more in favor of initiatives detached from fat-shaming that focus on providing easy and reliable access to a wide array of affordable, fresh, organic foods, in both raw form and pre-prepared but unpreserved meals. I want everyone to have the opportunity to eat as healthfully as they want to, irrespective of their economic status, region, ability, capacity.

But this is not that.

Banning "large sodas and other sugary drinks" in public spaces under the auspices of "combating obesity" is not about healthfulness. It's about arbitrarily inconveniencing people already disposed to fat hatred and then blaming fat people for it, in some futile gesture erroneously positioned as meaningful policy.

If Mayor Bloomberg wanted to do something purposeful, that was not simply about public fat-shaming, he could, say, lead a national movement petitioning the USDA to ban high-fructose corn syrup in all foods.

Given that researchers have found that HFCS prompts considerably more weight gain, and that the average USian's consumption of HFCS over the same time period associated with the OH NOES Obesity Epidemic has increased by "an alarming 12,250%," you'd think that the mayor might want to start there.

Of course, that would be a pretty steep uphill battle, since corn is subsidized to the tune of billions of dollars in the US every year. What a coinkydink!

It's easier just to ban 32-ounce Pepsis (but not 32-ounce milkshakes, obvs), and pat yourself on the back for "doing something" about the terrible scourge of fat people.

[Previously: The Problem Isn't That You're Unhealthy—It's That You're Ugly!; Evil Fatties; Salad vs. Big Mac; I'll Be Skinny in No Time!; Poor People Are Stupid. And Fat.]

Open Wide...

Generally Dreadful

image of Mitt Romney standing in front of a giant flag, to which I have added a dialogue bubble reading: 'Now I want the giant flag I requested and I want it right flippin' now!'

This Guy: Once More With Feeling: It's Not 1980. Obama will either win or lose the election, and he is definitely not Jimmy Carter! You can take that to the bank. But not Ron Paul's bank, which only accepts gold.

That Guy: The Romney Campaign's Surreal Arguments about the Economy. You know, I'm beginning to think that Mitt Romney is less than truthful and running a less than honest campaign. It's almost like he's a TERRIBLE PERSON and a TERRIBLE CANDIDATE! But obviously the Republican Party, which is no doi (French) the party of moral values, would never nominate someone who was a comprehensive dirtbag, WOULD THEY?!

Poll! Obama, Romney Deadlocked in Three Key States. Breaking News: Obama and Romney deadlocked in stupidly divided nation. We can only hope this election goes to the Supreme Court, which worked out PERFECTLY the last time.

In veepstakes news, John "Trillion Dollar Stack of Money" Thune is reportedly on Romney's shortlist. Which makes sense, considering that John Thune is a hateful jackass.

In other news, Buddy "Who?" Roemer has dropped out of the presidential race. We're all heartbroken, I'm sure.

Finally! In very serious news, there are GOP-led voter suppression efforts underway in states all across the nation. Here is what that looks like in Florida. I strongly encourage you to add The Brad Blog to your daily reading, if it's not already there, to keep abreast of voter suppression efforts and other electoral shenanigans.

Talk about these things! Or don't. Whatever makes you happy. Life is short.

Open Wide...

Bad News, Y'all

It turns out Fox News isn't fair and balanced after all. As you can imagine, I am devastated by this shocking news.

I am fully one hundred years old, so I remember a time when there was a thing called the Fairness Doctrine which would have prevented the airing of this sort of biased nonsense under the guise of "news." But thanks to Patron Saint of Conservatives Ronald Reagan, we don't have to worry about that anymore.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of sea lion swimming gracefully underwater

Hosted by a sea lion.

[Image courtesy of Shutterstock.]

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Originally posted by Paul the Spud: What is something you regularly do that people might consider "old fashioned?"

I cook virtually all our meals (including sauces and many condiments) from scratch, which a lot of people consider "old-fashioned." But it's a necessity, to avoid HFCS, and I'm fortunate I've got the privilege of time and access to fresh foods to do it.

Open Wide...

Assange Update

[Content Note: Rape culture.]

CNN: WikiLeaks' Assange loses sex case [sic] appeal but will fight on.

The British Supreme Court on Wednesday denied Julian Assange's appeal against extradition to Sweden over sexual abuse allegations, but the judges left open a surprise avenue for the WikiLeaks founder to fight on.

Assange will take it, his legal team said, arguing that the judges made their decision based on issues that were not argued in court.

Assange has been fighting for a year and a half against being sent to Sweden for questioning about accusations of sexual abuse.

Two women in Sweden accused Assange in August 2010 of sexually assaulting them during a visit to the country in connection with a WikiLeaks release of internal U.S. military documents.

The Supreme Court appeared Wednesday to clear the way for him to be sent to Sweden for questioning, then unexpectedly gave his legal team two weeks to file an appeal.

Assange lawyer Gareth Pierce said after the hearing that he would request a new hearing.

"The majority of the judges decided that custom and practice of the European community in effect trumped the law," she said. That "was not argued in court and that in itself would be a breach of the (European Convention on Human Rights) Article 6 guarantee to a fair hearing."

It is very unusual for the court to grant permission to appeal its rulings, which are supposed to be final in Britain.
Emphasis mine. Just what this case needed—some more sympathy and special treatment for Julian Assange, lest he suffer the incomprehensible indignity of being questioned about alleged misconduct.

Open Wide...

Random YouTubery

Ladies, gentlemen, and gender-rebels: I give you Canteloupe the Italian Greyhound.


Video Description: A grey-and-white Italian Greyhound sproings onto her owner's desk to steal something. Rinse and repeat about a dozen times.

The Daily What:
Canteloupe the two-year-old Italian Greyhound loves to steal things from her owner’s desk, so a friend decided to set up a camera and catch her red-pawed.

CamelsAndFriends
, the YouTuber behind the doggie surveillance operation, writes:
It got me wondering how exactly she gets up there and how she chooses what she steals, so I decided to start filming! I left the camera on a tripod pointed at the desk and a week later these are my results of Cantaloupe’s exploits.
The evidence is clear, ladies and gentlemen. You must find this dog guilty of being cute.

Open Wide...

Photo of the Day

image capturing a kingfisher's flight sequence as it swoops from water up to a branch
[Click to embiggen.]
From the Telegraph: This image captures a white collared kingfisher's flight sequence. The ten action shots were all caught within half a second by award-winning photographer CS Ling while on a river wildlife photo safari in Borneo. The photographer said: The shutter speed of 1/2000s was just right to freeze all ten different wing postures of the kingfisher. [C.S. Ling / Rex Features]

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

[Content Note: Misogyny; sexual objectification; heterocentrism.]

"There's two kinds of men. There are men who are fucking misogynist pigs, and then there are men who just really love women, who think they're the most amazing people in the world. And that's me. Maybe the reason I was promiscuous, and wanted to sleep with a lot of them, is that I love them so much."Adam Levine.

LOL FOREVER! I love the idea that there men who are misogynist pigs, and men who love women, and, according to Adam Levine, the men who sexually objectify women and fuck tons of 'em are in the latter category. Sure.

Not being a misogynist pig is not defined by fucking lots of women. It's not defined by loving women, or even liking them. Not being a misogynist is defined by respecting women.

Which Adam Levine clearly does not.

[Previously: The Voice of Misogyny.]

Open Wide...