Photo of the Day

President Barack Obama high-fives a little white boy being held in (presumably) his mother's arms
US President Barack Obama greets supporters at the Buckley Air Force Base in Colorado on May 23, 2012 upon arriving to attend a campaign event. [Getty Images]
Coincidentally, as I was putting this post together, Shaker Morgan emailed me the link to this piece in the New York Times, about the iconic image of President Obama bending over to let a child touch his hair, which is one of my favorites of the President.

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

[Content Note: Xenophobia; racism.]

"It seems to punish people who can't speak Spanish, and I resent that. In public areas, people should be speaking English, and that includes pizza parlors."—Peter Thomas, chairman of the Conservative Caucus and World Champion Harrumpher, on a promotional offer being made by Pizza PatrĂ³n, a carry-out pizza chain headquartered in Dallas, during which the company will "give away thousands of large pepperoni pizzas on the evening of June 5 to folks who order in Spanish."

True Facts:

1. I do not speak Spanish, besides a handful of words and phrases I've picked up over the years in various ways.

2. A place offering a free promotion to people who do speak Spanish is not discriminating against me.

3. "¿Puedo tener una pizza de salchicha, por favor?" I now know how to order a pizza, care of FreeTranslation.com. Yay for me.

4. Peter Thomas has chunks of hate and bile where his brains should be.

[H/T to Deeks.]

Open Wide...

This is a Terrible Profile of Jim Parsons

"The Normal Heart" resonated with him on a few levels: Mr. Parsons is gay and in a 10-year relationship, and working with an ensemble again onstage was like nourishment, he said. As the production was ending last summer, he heard that the Roundabout Theater Company was considering a revival of "Harvey" ... and last November the play's director, Scott Ellis, asked him and [actress Jessica Hecht, who plays Elwood's sister, Veta] to do a private reading of the work in Los Angeles.

"Jim was solid in 'The Normal Heart,'" Mr. Ellis said, "but his character didn't really change in the journey of that play, so I wanted to see if Jim could take on a challenge and float a couple of feet off the ground, so to speak, in that magical way Elwood has. And in the reading he was just smart, smart, smart."

In rehearsals Mr. Parsons focused particularly on his relationship with Harvey — a character who is not there. He chose spots in the Studio 54 theater to fix his gaze, at the exact height where Harvey's face would be, and developed a series of hand gestures when Elwood was speaking to or making way for the rabbit. If the show has plenty of the laugh lines that Mr. Parsons finds familiar from television, he said he was more aware of the differences between Elwood and Sheldon — and was savoring them.

"Elwood has such warmth, and wants nothing more than to connect with other people, whereas my nine-month-a-year job is a character who says things like, 'If you don't mind, I'd like to stop listening to you and talk now,'" Mr. Parsons said. "The jump-out-of-bed happiness I feel transcends any nerves about taking on a history-laden role."
Bazinga! Just kidding. The profile is great and you should definitely read it! Another classic prank by Melissa McEwan.

(This is great material if you watch The Big Bang Theory, I swear.)

Open Wide...

BushQuotes!

Chapter 3, page 41-42: "The room exploded when the first television network announced a new Governor in Texas: Governor George W. Bush. I hugged my daughters and kissed my wife."

And then I ruined ALL the things!

[From George Bush's A Charge to Keep, gifted to me by Deeky, because he hates me. In the US, all people who plan to run for president write a shitty book. (Some are less shitty than others, by which I mean the Democrats' books.) A Charge to Keep was George W. Bush's shitty I-wanna-be-president book, published in 1999. I am blogging one random quote per page every day until I have either made my way through the book or lost it behind a couch.]

Open Wide...

Number of the Day

53%: The number of USians who think same-sex marriage should be legal, according to the latest Washington Post-ABC News poll, taken after President Obama's statement that he personally supports marriage equality.

That is an all-time high.

Those who think same-sex marriage should be illegal has fallen to 39%, an all-time low.

Only six years ago, the same poll found just 36% of respondents in support of legal same-sex marriage. A 17% increase in support in six years might not seem like a lot, especially when support is still only at 53%, but to put that into perspective, I want to quote again this old John Rogers post:

[W]hen the Supreme Court struck down the bans against interracial marriage in 1968 through Virginia vs. Loving, SEVENTY-TWO PERCENT of Americans were against interracial marriage. As a matter of fact, approval of interracial marriage in the US didn't cross the positive threshold until -- sweet God – 1991.
It took 23 years for support of interracial marriage to move 23 points.

Fifty-three percent isn't good enough; I expect more. (Way more.) But nothing rejuvenates a tired teaspoonin' arm like evidence of meaningful progress.

UPDATE: Relatedly, General Colin Powell tells Wolf Blitzer he doesn't "see any reason not to say that [committed same-sex couples] should be able to get married." He uses the same "they're just like us, raising kids and all that!" language as did the president, bleh, but still. This is the power of the bully pulpit: The President has made it a viable position to publicly hold.

Open Wide...

Wednesday Blogaround

This blogaround brought to you chocolate.

Recommended Reading:

Annie-Rose: Pennsylvania Legislature Will Consider Defunding Planned Parenthood

Jessica: Your "Joke" Isn't Funny, and Your Defenses Are Contemptible [Content note for racism, misogyny, slut-shaming, and sexual violence.]

Pam: North Carolina Pastor Charles Worley Now Under Media Microscope [Content note for violent homophobia; eliminationism.]

Steve: Steve King's Way With Words [Content note for racism; dehumanization; anti-immigrant garbage.]

Courtney: How I Got 50% Women Speakers at My Tech Conference

Sean: Dark Matter Still Exists

Andy: Adam Lambert Makes Music History: First Out Gay Artist to Hit #1 on Billboard Album Chart

[Content note for imagery and description of imagery] And get well soon, Michael McKean!

Leave your links and recommendations in comments...

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

Just some of the hilariously awkward positions in which I've discovered Lord Dudlington of Goofball Manor over the past few days...

image of Dudley the Greyhound lying on his back on the couch, with his legs in the air and his neck craned back so his head is hanging off the cushion toward the floor

image of Dudley lying on the couch next to me, on his back, legs in the air, head lolling off to one side

image of Dudley lying on his dog bed, with his nose tucked under the dog bed beside it

image of Dudley lying on the living room floor with his front legs twisted in a knot

image of Dudley lying on his back on the couch with his legs in the air, and his head stretched across a gap resting on the ottoman

image of Dudley lying on his side on his dog bed, with his head curled forward and his legs and tail gathered up together in a tangle

image of Dudley lying on his side on the couch, with his head on a pillow, legs crossed and ears akimbo
"What?"

I love that dog like a loved thing made out of loved bits.

Open Wide...

The Bird is the Word

Okay, so I need to tell you that I kind of love Kristen Stewart.* I find her to be a compelling actor, although I'm not certain yet if she's a great one. I dig most of her interviews, in which she is often hilariously blunt and does things like refer to Robert Pattison as "my fucking boyfriend." This recent interview with Teen.com in which she says interesting things about Snow White and the Huntsman (which I can't wait to see, by the way) and funny things about her pets, is pretty good:

Stewart, sitting for an interview with a castle as a backdrop: Whoa, that's sooooo weird. [makes a face and holds up her hand]

Text Onscreen with accompanying voiceover: Teen.com.

Stewart, asked about "kicking a lot of ass" in SWATH: I think the coolest thing about it was that, that they were never going to have me do something that I couldn't actually physically do. [over scenes from SWATH] It was never going to be like, you know, a superhero movie. It was gonna be like, okay, so what—what could a girl actually be capable of in a situation like this? You know, I'm not going to be able to take out like six-foot men in armor. It's, like, you know, about being faster than them, or about like being smarter. And that was cool, because I think it's kinda super on-trend right now to have strong female characters just sort of act like guys.

[edit]

Stewart, asked in a tweet about the necklace she's wearing: [looks at and plays with necklace] Oh, um, it's just a little token. [shrugs] Had a birthday recently. That's all. [edit; now being cheeky, after being asked again] I found it! It just, like, it just appeared somewhere, and I was like, "Whoa. It's on my birthday! It's been so great this year!" Nah.

[edit]

Stewart, asked about whether her cat Max or dog Bear loves her more: Ohhhhhh. [laughs] That's so weird. They both, I think they both like me in, love me, I think [laughs] in very different ways. I think Bear is literally a child. He's like my, he's still a baby. [motions Bear lying beside her] And Max is like... [makes standoffish face of perfect cat contempt] I mean, we live together. [laughs] He's like my roommate. And, uh, so yeah, there's a difference there.
But. BUT! My favorite thing ever about Kristen Stewart is how she totally doesn't give a fuck. Which leads me to this ridiculously awesome photo of her at the premiere of Snow White and the Huntsman with co-stars Charlize Theron and Chris "Thor" Hemsworth:

Kristen Stewart, in a black lace dress, makes a face and flips the birth as she crouches next to Chris Hemsworth, in a grey suit, and Charlize Theron, in a black gown
[Click for close-up.]

I love this picture so hard. Kristen Stewart, in her exquisite, expensive, extraordinary gown, crouching like a naughty child, sticking out her tongue, and giving Charlize Theron and Chris Hemsworth the finger. LOL! And Chris Hemsworth grinning and Charlize Theron giving Stewart this total "WTF?" expression and gesture. LOL! It's just the greatest.

I mean, it's great just because of the brilliant irreverence that really shatters the insufferable self-importance of movie premieres, but also, I gotta be honest, I just love women who flip the bird.

-------------------

* Which, I want to underline, does not mean I think she's perfect, or that I am unaware of the fact she has had made some public mistakes (for which she's been remarkably good about apologizing after listening to criticism) or been in some less than perfectly feminist films. If perfection, no less perfection at age 22, were a condition of fondness, we'd all be pretty fucked, now, wouldn't we? So let's skip the "Well, I certainly don't love her since she fucked up this one time!" comments. You don't have to love her. But, short of signing a pro-Polanski position or being personally abusive, maybe we can let go the unearthing and recounting of personal failures about which regret has been expressed in threads highlighting something good about someone. People who live public lives make public mistakes.

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime



The Moog Cookbook: "Black Hole Sun"

Open Wide...

Random Nerd Nostalgia: Waka waka. BoooOOOP!

AtariPacManAd

[Description: Title "Love At First Bite" with a picture of Pac-Man about to eat two ghosts. Bottom: "Home Video Games. Pac-Man: Only from Atari. Atari makes more videogames than anyone. Have you played Atari today?"]

Scanned from a 1982 Wonder Woman.

Open Wide...

This Will Be Getting a Lot of Attention

Gallup's latest polling on abortion makes for a pretty depressing headline: "Pro-Choice" Americans at Record-Low 41%.

And, you know, it's not good news that 41% of USians identify as "pro-choice" while 50% identify as "pro-life."

image of trend chart showing the above-referenced stats

But it's not actually as bad as it sounds, either: "Gallup's longest-running measure of abortion views, established in 1975, asks Americans if abortion should be legal in all circumstances, legal only under certain circumstances, or illegal in all circumstances" and that question finds only 20% of respondents who want to fully criminalize abortion.

25% of respondents say abortion should be legal in all circumstances, and 52% say abortion should be legal in some circumstances, meaning 77% of USians still favor keeping abortion legal in some form.

image of trend chart showing the above-referenced stats

That is overwhelming support for legal abortion, which a headline like "only 41% are pro-choice!" doesn't indicate at all.

Conservative strategists are extremely good at demonizing language, and they've successfully turned "pro-choice" toxic in much the same way they did "liberal." But they haven't successfully made support for legal abortion unpopular.

We still have a lot of work to do, but we already knew that.

Open Wide...

What They Got Was Each Other

Serendipitously, right after posting yesterday's QotD, my friend Mark recommended this interview with Damon Lindelof, one of the primary writers on Lost, the series finale of which aired two years ago today.

At 25 minutes, it's too long for me to transcribe in total, but this was my favorite bit:

"What did these people get out of this plane crash? And the answer, as corny as it sounds, was the one that appealed to me the most, which is: Each other! That's what they got. They were all fucked-up, sad individuals who were lost in their own lives and hated themselves, and somehow they found some fundamental community amongst each other. If they hadn't met each other, and spent all that time on the island, then they would never have been able to forgive themselves for their past sins and break through to some sort of level of self-awakening and forgiveness."
That was always how I viewed the show. I didn't love the final episode, which is the primary focus of the interview, but I will always love the show for being one of the finest stories about community ever told.

Open Wide...

Generally Horrible

image of Mitt Romney standing in front of a national debt sign, to which I have added a dialogue bubble reading: 'I mean, I'm not sure *exactly* what our national debt is, but I think it's around something like, oh, I dunno, let's say about ten? Ten mil- I mean billion. Trillion? Look, it's a lot of corndogs.'

GOOD MORNING! (Or whatever!) Here is some news for you...

This Guy: Obama Campaign Expands Bain Attack and General Election Ad Buys.

That Guy: Mitt Romney's Bain Problem: Private Equity Has Bad Rap with Public.

Poll! NBC/WSJ poll: Obama, Romney Locked in Tight Contest.

This Guy: Obama Challenged in Arkansas Primary.

That Guy: GOP Discovers That Mitt Romney Could Win.

Poll! WRAL News poll: Presidential Race Dead Heat in NC.

This Guy: Obama Spending Binge Never Happened.

That Guy: Romney Oil Adviser Also a Big Super PAC Donor.

Poll! Romney Takes Lead in Florida.

See? What did I tell you? And do any of these stories make a blinking bit of difference to anyone's opinion of President Barack Obama or Mitt Romney? Because those stories boil down to: President Obama is campaigning, and, by the way, he's not super popular in very conservative states and his opponents lie about his record. Mitt Romney is a rich corporatist who has a shot at the White House both in spite and because of his ties to wealthy Big Business interests. If anyone is shocked by any of that "news," congratulations on waking from your coma!

I will now turn it over to Andrew Sullivan for some totally trenchant commentary on Mitt Romney's laugh. I guess there wasn't any news about Sarah Palin's vagina today.

Talk about these things! Or don't. Whatever makes you happy. Life is short.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of a small colorful bird nearly camouflaged by its lush habitat

Hosted by a Kakapo. Photo by Shane McInnes.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

What is your favorite television series finale of all time? (And because "series" means different things in different places, what I mean is the final episode ever.)

Please note that this thread will obviously be rife with spoilers. Commenters should take care to name the show first, before providing details, so others can read comments based on a want-to-know basis.

Open Wide...

Photo of the Day

a lioness in a fiels of bluebells looks at a sign saying not to pick the flowers
From the Telegraph's Pictures of the Day for 22 May 2012: Keepers have put up a sign telling visitors not to pick the flowers—in the lion enclosure at Longleat Safari Park in Wiltshire, England. Every spring the grassy paddock where the lions are kept gives way to a glorious display of bluebells. [Pete Willows/BNPS]

Open Wide...

Promoted from Comments

[Content Note: Body image.]

Shaker natesmom:

I've never enjoyed being in my body. I have NEVER enjoyed BEING in MY body...the only one I'm going to ever have. I'm 44 and my entire life has been devoted to trying to *fix* my body so I'd be comfortable with it.

[Shaker itsdanilove's] statement [about enjoying being in her body] has brought me to tears...and it has made me realize that I've been on the wrong damn journey all along. I've tried to change my body, when I've needed to change my mind.

Open Wide...

Girls

logo from the HBO series 'Girls': The word GIRLS in teal lettering on a black background

So, everyone on the planet (apparently) has watched the new HBO series Girls, which is definitely a show about young straight white women produced by Judd Apatow. (Whooooooops?) It is written, however, by its star, Lena Dunham, who is a female person, if actually a woman rather than a girl, except in the specific context where "girl" is being used in that "there is no female equivalent for dude" kind of way.

But I digress! The point is that (so I'm told) everyone on the planet has watched Girls and then written about it. Except for me!

I was too busy reading all the things that everyone else has written about it! And there have been some very smart observations made about this show, like: All of these girls are white; all of these girls are straight; all of these girls are cisgender; all of these girls appear to be able-bodied and thin and traditionally pretty; all of these girls are, in real life, the daughters of famous people; it stinks when you want to be able to celebrate women's stories getting told, but you feel like barfing because OMG the privileging of privilege again, and we need this show because LADIES and simultaneously we really don't need this show because PRIVILEGED LADIES; this show bears some resemblances to, and is yet different from, Sex and the City; and other things.

I have also read Lena Dunham's responses to some of these smart observations, like how she didn't want to stick some token woman of color into the group of friends in the show she writes, because she wanted it to be authentic or whatever, and on the one hand, I'm like, "Yeah, tokenism is terrible," but on the other hand, I'm like, "But why don't you have any friends of color, Lena Dunham? And if you do, then why would it be inauthentic tokenism to have cast a woman of color as one of your friends in a show that takes place in one of the most ethnically diverse cities in the world?"

I mean, I basically live on a farm with a strip mall on it in Wherethehell, Midweststate, and I couldn't spend an afternoon with three of my friends in which all four of us were straight cis able-bodied thin white women, because there is too much diversity among my circle of friends to accomplish that feat of exclusion! And also I am not that thing! But even leaving me out if it, I can't find three of those Platonic Ideals of Privileged Womanhood in my address book.

(It's like a rotary phone, but on paper.)

I have watched the show now, all of the episodes. Leaving aside the problematic elements inherent to the premise and casting, there are things I like about it, and things I don't. (Controversial!) I don't really relate much to the women in Girls, which might just be down to women not being a monolith and all that, but I also remember Judd Apatow saying the show allows "guys to get an insight into realistic females," and I realize that maybe the reason I'm failing to relate to the characters is because they're just the same old kyriarchetypes used to enforce complicity by way of positioning as "real" that which most closely conforms to tradition, dressed up as hipsters.

I also suspect that the people who find the show "important" tend mostly to be people who don't bother seeking out or listening to women's stories unless they're told paired with naked titties on a cable show they read someone else call "important."

Which doesn't necessarily mean the show isn't important, in some genuine way. But if it is, it's important primarily by virtue of its cavernous void of peers.

If the entertainment industry was filled with fabulous feminist and womanist women of every stripe and shape and color and age and sexuality and gender and ability and philosophy, whose ideas and projects and opinions were everywhere, as ubiquitous as the ideas and projects and opinions of misogynists, if that's the world in which we lived, I don't think I'd be writing a post about Girls.

Which isn't really Girls' fault.

Anyway! After I finished the last episode, I texted Deeks: "The most amazing thing about Girls is that I just saw Peter Scolari's wiener. That is definitely one wiener I never imagined I'd see."

Please consider that my official contribution to the ENORMOUS CONVERSATION that has been taking place online about Girls.

Discuss.

Open Wide...

Objecting to Objectification

by Shaker koach

[Content Note: Objectification.]

I came out as a lesbian in college. One day in class, I was completely distracted by the woman next to me: She was idly twirling her foot around, swinging her clunky sandal from her nicely tanned foot with bright red nail polish. I was mesmerized. And suddenly I realized…I like women! I love their bodies! I love looking at them! It was a revelation to me, and as I gradually absorbed the idea, parts of my past suddenly started to make sense. This strange sense of unease I'd had for most of my life around other women—it was attraction. The unnamable discomfort I'd been feeling for years was lust.

For example, I played sports throughout my adolescence, and I always felt uncomfortable in the women's locker room. Now I saw that it wasn't the same sort of discomfort that most other kids felt. Instead, I was uncomfortable because there was all this female flesh around, all these lovely body parts that I wanted to look at. The idea that someone might look at me in some stage of undress was uncomfortable to me only because it turned me on. A few years ago Liss wrote about her high school friendship with another girl, and, wondering what made her different, wondered if she was attracted to this girl. I had several friendships like that throughout middle and high school, but it's only with the benefit of hindsight that I was able to see that I was attracted to several of my female friends. Sure, I thought they were smart, kind, and witty, but I also desired them.

Accepting my identity as a lesbian meant accepting that I was attracted to women, that I found (and find) women's bodies lovely and fascinating and marvelous. When I looked at a beautiful actress, I was checking out her hips, her ass, her breasts, her thighs, her shoulders, her jawline, all the breathtaking curves and angles that exist on a woman's (on every woman's) body. Accepting my identityǂ as a lesbian meant, at least in part, accepting that I lusted after these very parts.

Gradually I became more explicit and open about my desire for women and their lovely bodies. When a woman with a great, large ass walked by, I'd turn to watch her go. When my waitress had nice cleavage, I checked her out. (Yes, there was a time when I might have enjoyed National Cleavage Day, because I enjoyed letting a furtive glance at cleavage turn into a lingering one, even though I would have been and still am opposed to giving social sanction to men doing the same.) I admired feet, arms, hips, faces, eyes, everything. What can I say? I dig women, and every woman has something unique, something beautiful, something worth a second glance or an extended gaze. I didn't discriminate: I loved fat, thin, and in-between bodies, tall and short bodies, bodies of all colors, disabled and temporarily abled bodies, butch, feminine, queer, and trans* bodies, covered and uncovered bodies.

Fast forward a few more years, and I'm walking across campus on a beautiful spring day with one of my best, straight, female friends. She said something about all the young women out exercising in their sports bras and tiny shorts, how it motivated her to start exercising. I chuckled lasciviously and said I had very different thoughts when I looked at the women sweating in their skimpy clothes, then waggled my eyebrows suggestively. She stopped in her tracks and looked at me in surprise. She said, "You only see them as bodies to ogle?"

It was my turn to stop in my tracks. I saw, suddenly, that my appreciation of women had become demeaning. Though I was a lesbian, I was looking at other women with The Male Gaze. I was objectifying them. I realized a lesbian reducing a woman to a nice ass was no different to the woman being objectified than a man doing so.

To be clear: There's nothing wrong with noticing. To be attracted to other people means one will experience attraction. But one can be attracted without objectifying.

This is pretty hard to admit. I'm a feminist and I was before I knew the word; I wholeheartedly and as continually as possible support women in any way I can. I'm in a field where most lower-level positions are filled by female people and most senior- and academic- level positions are filled by male people, so the empowerment, encouragement, and non-objectification of women is personal as well as political and philosophical for me. In the past, I've pointed out problematic male objectification of women to my father, brothers, and male friends, to try to sway their behavior and thoughts. I respect and honor women and I'd never objectify them—so I thought.

This has been hard for me to untangle and I'm not all the way there. My recognition of my "homosexual tendencies" has been tied up in recognizing my desire for women and their bodies. Yet I know there are other things that draw me to women, that turn me on, that keep me fascinated. For example, I love thinking about and talking about the ways that different women have found to respond to societal expectations about roles, dress, and behavior. Some women embrace these expectations, some reluctantly accept them, some challenge them, some subvert them, some overturn them, or some combination thereof, and all of these individual, varied responses intrigue me. I love all the uses to which different women have put their intellectual capabilities or their passion or their strength. I think I celebrate womanhood in its broadest, most diverse, least-monolithic sense.

And yet. When I'm looking at a woman and reducing her to a nice ass or great breasts, I'm not doing that. I'm treating women as one class, with various physical attributes that are more or less pleasing to my particular eye.

Being consistent and true to my feminism has meant that I have to call myself out when I'm objectifying women. If I repudiate men doing that (and I do), then I need to repudiate women doing it as well. Objectification is objectification. Reducing anyone to a body part is offensive and demeaning. Reading the Today in Disembodied Things series and this post have helped me think through this and reaffirm my objection to objectification. If I'm admiring a sexy pair of legs, for example, but I stop there, without considering the woman as a whole, without wondering about her personality, what drives her, her dreams, what makes her laugh, well, I'm pretty close to viewing her as a passive object there for my viewing pleasure. So I try to remind myself that behind every attractive physical attribute lies a person—a person who is not a passive receptacle for my gaze, but who deserves respect and consideration.

-----------------------------

Ç‚ This acceptance wasn't easy for me, because I grew up in a Midwestern conservative Christian household where sexuality and lust were forbidden topics; the story of how I did eventually accept and embrace my sexuality is long, winding, and not the topic of this post. Suffice to say, I have gotten to the point where I am comfortable, happy, and proud to be a lesbian.

Open Wide...

Random Nerd Nostalgia: The Not-So-Dark Knight

Photobucket

[Description: Robin is asking a Scarlet-clad Batman, "But Batman, last night you wore the green costume, and tonight you're wearing the red! Why?" Bats: "I must, Robin--I must wear a different colored Batman costume each night!"]

Open Wide...