Chicago NATO Protests Open Thread

[Content Note: Violence; police brutality.]

Iain and I watched the events in Chicago unfold yesterday in horror. It looked like a war zone in Chicago, as hundreds of uniformed police officers in blue riot helmets chanted as they pushed against protesters downtown to protest the NATO summit.

Protesters were told they would be allowed to march, but then their route was blocked. At one point, watching the live news coverage, I saw about six police officers roughly grab an older man with long gray hair and a long beard and push him to the ground to arrest him. (For what, I've no idea, but he was making no threatening physical gestures and was holding nothing. So, I guess he got arrested for mouthing off. Awesome.) As he fell to the ground, an entire swarm of police officers surrounded him, and he disappeared beneath them. It was deeply troubling.

a protestor's view in the midst of a melee, of a uniformed officer about to throw a punch

Spudsy sent me this image, which is being circulated among Chicagoans (and others watching) this morning. That pretty much sums up the tenor of what I was seeing on the news.

Following are some pieces I've read this morning so far about events in Chicago over the weekend. Please feel welcome and encouraged to link additional items in comments.

Kevin at FDL: Occupy Journalists Stopped, Searched, Handcuffed & Interrogated at Gunpoint.

Tracey at The UpTake: Chicago Police Attack Press, Use Bikes as Weapons.

Matt at Nation Now in the LA TImes: NATO Protests Continue in Chicago; 2 More Face Terrorism Charges.

The Chicago Sun-Times' complete coverage, including lots of video, links, articles, and event schedules, is here.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of a grey bird with orange highlights flying

Hosted by an Asian Crested Ibis. Photo by Quan Min Li.

Open Wide...

Sunday Shuffle

Emerald Rose, Autumn in Asheville



And you?

Open Wide...

Open Thread

McDonaldland Happy Meal characters, a shake, a burger, cookies and french fries.  They're puppets!

Hosted by the Happy Meal folks.

This week's open threads have been brought to you by
retro fast food mascots.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

Burger King character Sir Shakes-a-Lot.
Hosted by Sir Shakes-a-Lot.

Open Wide...

The Virtual Pub Is Open

image of a pub photoshopped to be named 'The Fat Fucking Pub'
[Explanations: lol your fat. pathetic anger bread. hey your gay.]

TFIF, Shakers!

Belly up to the bar,
and name your poison!

Open Wide...

On Being a Thin Friend to Fatsronauts

[Content Note: Fat-shaming; body policing; bullying; gaslighting.]

Last night, in the comments to Big Fat Love, Shaker rvh asked, in response to a line in my piece:

"maybe your thin friends passive-aggressively use your weight to make themselves feel better about their insecurities"...

How does this work? I am asking because I wouldn't ever want to do it and I genuinely don't know what behaviour would fit into that category.
This is a particular issue for women, since "diet/weight talk" and body policing are so central to much of female communication—it's a source of solidarity or contention (or both) between mothers and daughters (and sisters, etc.), a means of bonding between female friends and colleagues, a competitive frame between women, a means of auditing inclusion and exclusion in female groups—and is thus the source of a lot of good feelings and bad feelings among women. It is not, however, exclusive to women. One of the worst examples of ongoing, explicit, and profoundly harmful body policing around weight that I know is between a father and a son.

First, a caveat: Fat people police one another, too. (See Brian's great post, "Fat Isolation," which addresses some of the ways in which fat people engage with fat-shaming narratives.) This post isn't about how fat people are perfect saintly victims of meany thin people: Some of the most vicious fat-shaming ever directed at me has been by fat people who just weren't as fat as me, and boy howdy was their fragile self-esteem wrapped up in simply not being the fattest person in the room. And fat people even have their own special narratives of shaming one another, like the old "at least I'm proportionately fat!" chestnut, used to shame anyone whose fat body is fatter on the bottom, or on top, or in the torso, or the limbs, or some variation on failing to be a perfectly plump version of a thin person.

But, what we don't have is thin privilege, of the sort that gifts one the luxury of never having to consider the ways in which our language, and our public participation in the culture of weight-obsessed "diet/weight talk" and body policing, can inadvertently hurt and dehumanize the (other) fat people around us. That's central to the question rvh asked, and that's the question I'm going to answer.

Sometimes, it's just a function of unexamined privilege. It may not be your conscious intent to use a fat friend's weight to counterbalance your own insecurities, but that can be an unintended communication in habits like constantly referring to yourself as fat, or saying you "feel fat," or announcing that you need to lose weight, or body policing other people in front of a fat friend.

If you're saying things that could quite reasonably make your fat friend think, "Jesus, if zie thinks that about hirself/that other person who is not as fat as I am, what must zie think about ME?!" that's a problem.

If you're saying things that oblige your fat friend reassure you, "No, you're not fat; you look great!" that's a problem.

If you routinely talk about "looking good" and "being fat" as mutually exclusive concepts, e.g. "Oh, I look terrible in that picture—look how fat I look!", thus implicitly conveying to your fat friend that zie can't be fat and look good at the same time, that's a problem.

And, if your fat friend points out one of these unintended communications to you, and your response is either gaslighting ("I didn't mean it that way; you're putting words in my mouth because you're just sensitive about your weight!") or trying to create some secondary beauty standard just for fat people ("It's not that fat people can't look good; you just good look in a different way, but you really know how to work what you've got!"), that's a problem.

One of the things that thin friends have done to me my whole life, often without any malicious intent, is treat my general (but not total) lack of participation in the unwinnable game of achieving the beauty standard, as either evidence of my having "given up" or the logical response given how far outside the privileged aesthetic I am. Why bother, when you so obviously can't achieve anything resembling beauty, anyway? Oof.

There is truth to the fact that deviating so wildly from what is culturally regarded as "objective" beauty failed to inspire in me any ravenous desire to attain status on my appearance (though feminism was frankly a greater disincentive; I was still a small in-betweenie when I formed boundaries around how much I was willing to conform to imposed norms). But thin friends have often unintentionally conveyed harsh messaging about how (un)satisfied I should be with my body, by remarking on how evident it is I don't care. A lot of backhand-complimentary messaging verging on "letting yourself go" memes.

That's a problem, too.

And if you react differently to a thin friend's self-policing than to a fat friend's, if you figure that a thin friend wants to hear, "Oh, I hate my body, too!" and a fat friend wants to hear, "Oh, but your face/hair/blouse is so pretty!" that's also a big problem. Not only does it convey that fat friends should hate their bodies, but hey here's a weak compliment, it also conveys to fat friends that the body policing which is an invitation for inclusion in a sisterhood among thin women does not extend to us.

Your flaws are so big or multitudinous, we don't even know what do to with you. Often, thin women, in a failed bid at sensitivity, exclude fat women from self-policing with platitudes, instead of just not doing it at all. One of the least obvious but most common ways thin women hurt their fat friends is with pity.

Sometimes, it's evidence of an agenda. Most of us have thin friends who do this sort of thing out of thin privilege—simply not considering what it unintentionally communicates—and many of us also have thin friends (or family members, etc.) who do this sort of thing with an agenda. That is, they fat-shame with the desired objective of feeling better about themselves.

I have a thin friend who incessantly gripes to me about how "fat" she's getting. She will examine herself in a mirror, or look down at her leg while she's wearing shorts, or grab her flesh and say things like, "Look at this disgusting cellulite!" She then looks at me pointedly, waiting for me to "compliment" her by observing the manifestly obvious: That she is not fat.

(I trust I don't need to elucidate why obliging me to treat "You're not fat" as a compliment is no fucking fun.)

Or she'll grouse about having not accomplished some professional goal she thought she'd have accomplished by her current age, or about getting grey hair, and say, "Well, at least I'm doing better than X. I just saw her at the store and OMG she has gained SO MUCH WEIGHT." She then carefully scrutinizes my face, searching for evidence that I feel terrible about being fat, so she can feel better about herself because at least she's not fat and feeling terrible about it!

Inevitably, I disappoint her by saying instead, "Your body is strong and healthy, which is such a privilege for which to be thankful!" or "Oh, I'd love to run into her. She was always so nice/funny/smart/whatever."

I disappoint her by failing to give her the satisfaction of seeing me crushed at the implication I'm a monstrous wreck in comparison to her—an implication that cannot be overtly challenged, because, of course, she gives herself plenty of room to say, "That's not what I said! You're just being insecure!"

We are old friends, but I don't see her very much—for reasons that I'm guessing are obvious, but I will state it plainly nonetheless: My body does not exist to make other people feel better about theirs, and I do not consider my fatness the negative benchmark on a competitive scale.

You may be wondering how you're supposed to convey that you're unhappy with your body in a way that doesn't effectively imply there's something wrong with your fat friend's body. And the truth is: Maybe there isn't. Like other forms of privilege, thin privilege means that complaining of some aspect of that privilege, even if it is a legitimate complaint, can make you look like a real asshole to people who don't share it.

"My raise at work wasn't enough that I can buy the dream home I wanted, and I'm super disappointed!" is a valid thing to express, when you've worked hard and laid plans and been given promises by an employer who didn't deliver. But it's also something most of us realize isn't a concern about which we want to oblige consolation from our unemployed friend who's just lost hir home to foreclosure.

Body policing and "diet/weight talk" are so pervasive, and fat hatred so accepted, that it's not considered bad form for people with thin privilege to oblige commiseration from fat friends. (In fact, some thin people get miffed when fat people object to being drafted into such conversations: "I thought you of all people would understand!") The first step in avoiding trading on thin privilege is simply to acknowledge that even participating in policing, of self or others, can convey negative, judgmental messaging to fat friends.

Obviously, every friendship is unique, and some fat friends are completely comfortable discussing body image with thin friends. But that should not be assumed, even if fat friends have previously joined in weight talk and body policing. Fat people are expected, and often pressured, to join in, and can use that participation as a self-defense mechanism, even if it makes them anxious and unhappy.

(For me, as one example, I'm comfortable discussing body image with some friends, and not others, based on individual levels of empathy and sensitivity, and the quality of the discussion—attention-seeking negativity I can't abide, but straightforward or humorous self-evaluating is something I value with many of my friends.)

If you want to discuss body image with a fat friend, my recommendation is this: Talk to them explicitly about their comfort level with that subject. If you're not good enough friends to have that conversation, don't discuss it all.

Open Wide...

Today in Rape Culture

by Shakesville Moderator Scott Madin

[Content Note: Rape, rape culture, rape apologism/trivialization, misogyny, racism/Orientalism.]

Recently a company called Soda Pop Miniatures launched a Kickstarter project to fund a card game called "Tentacle Bento". The game features anime/manga-style art, mainly of busty young women in stereotypical "schoolgirl" uniforms, and is set at "Takoashi University"*, a fictional school in Japan. (Note here that John Cadice, the owner of Soda Pop and lead artist on the game, is a white American.)

The game riffs on the conventions of tentacle hentai, with players taking on the role of the monsters, and competing to "snatch" the most "girls". As I understand it, there is no actually explicit or graphic art or language in the game, nor is the action of the game referred to as "rape" at any point — what's happening is conveyed by innuendo and an assumption of prior understanding of the genre's conventions.

Games journalist Brandon Sheffield (@necrosofty on Twitter) was the first person I saw publicizing that Kickstarter was hosting a project that trivialized rape for entertainment, and after further commentary and complaints to Kickstarter that this violated their terms on "prohibited content", Kickstarter canceled the project. (For those unfamiliar with Kickstarter, when a project launches a funding deadline is set, and Kickstarter users can pledge to back the project; projects offer backer rewards at different pledge amounts, but no one's credit card gets charged unless the project reaches its funding goal, and then only once the deadline arrives.)

(At the $500 pledge level for Tentacle Bento, a backer could choose to submit a photo of "yourself or your wife/girlfriend" to be used as a model for a victim card; as far as I can tell these special cards were only going to be included in promotional card decks sent to backers, not the retail product. Eight people had pledged at the $500 level when the project was canceled.)

Sheffield and other critics fielded a lot of backlash after Kickstarter canceled the project, in all the predictable forms. Then Mike "Gabe" Krahulik of Penny Arcade (who I'm sure you all remember from the enormous mess that erupted over their "dickwolves" comic strip) decided he'd support Soda Pop — who moved their fundraising efforts to their own website after Kickstarter pulled the plug on them — by tweeting a link to their donation page.

I'm sure everyone can guess how things went after that.

Following are the main links I know of about the game, its cancellation on Kickstarter, and the controversy that's followed. Please feel welcome and encouraged to drop additional links into comments.

The Kickstarter Page. (The pages for canceled and unsuccessful projects, as well as successful projects remain up — I'm not sure for how long.)

Trailer Video. (In this trailer, as @diannapevensie noted, exclusively white actors portray the students and staff of a purportedly Japanese university.)

Brandon Sheffield: Tentacle Bento and Kickstarter: When No Regulation Is Bad Regulation.

Anna Anthropy (@auntiepixelante): Do You Really, Really, Not Get the Difference?

Alex Raymond (@elenielstorm): Kickstarter Cancels Tentacle Rape Card Game.

Shawn (@Counterpower): Why I Didn't Attend PAX East.

Mat Jones (@pillowfort): Penny Arcade, Tentacle Bento, A Summation.

Alli Thresher (@AlliThrasher), guest-posting at Alyssa Rosenberg's blog: A Tentacle Rape Game – Why Are People Supporting This Again?

Sheffield: The Boundaries of Humor: An Interview with John Cadice, Creator of Tentacle Bento.

Dianna E. Anderson (@diannapevensie): Making a Game of Rape.

--------------------

* I don't speak or read Japanese, but from what I can gather "tako" means "octopus".

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

And that's what Zoƫ thinks about that.

Open Wide...

BushQuotes!

Chapter 3, page 37: "The newspaper deliveryman, a man with a gimme cap and without several teeth, was loading the rack of papers when Karen saw him stop and look at the huge picture of me on the front page."

Still talking about the hunting incident. So instead, I thought I'd share with you how George W. Bush views the classic Texan hoi polloi. Toothless and trucker-hatted. Obvs.

This book is the worst.

[From George Bush's A Charge to Keep, gifted to me by Deeky, because he hates me. In the US, all people who plan to run for president write a shitty book. (Some are less shitty than others, by which I mean the Democrats' books.) A Charge to Keep was George W. Bush's shitty I-wanna-be-president book, published in 1999. I am blogging one random quote per page every day until I have either made my way through the book or lost it behind a couch.]

Open Wide...

Friday Blogaround

This blogaround brought to you by piano music.

Recommended Reading:

Paige: A Planet Under Pressure, and Why Gender Matters

Jesse: What Did JPMorgan Execs Know and When Did They Know It?

andreana: Set it Off: On Obama, Marriage, and Visibility [Content Note: The post at this link includes discussion of homophobia, transphobia, gender policing, and associated violence.]

Andrew: Gay Families Meet with Lawmakers in D.C.

Laura: There's Nothing Radical About Transphobia

Jim: Facts Are Cool [Content Note: The post at this link includes statistics about oppression and violence, discussion of privilege, and use of ableist language.]

Lesley: A Rape Survivor Speaks [Content Note: The post at this link is a survivor's impact statement, which includes details of a sexual assault and its aftermath.]

Melissa: Trailer Watch: Won't Back Down [video]

Leave your links and recommendations in comments...

Open Wide...

Random Nerd Blogging: Everything's Better With Sea Monkeys!

...because "Everything's Better With Brine Shrimp" just didn't have the same ring to it.

SeaMonkeyAdvertisement

[Description: An advertisement which says "Only $1.00!" in one corner, over a picture of monkey-looking, anthropomorphized sea creatures which amazingly resemble a white hetero-normative family: Dad, Mom with blond hair in a bow, and two monkey young'uns. In an inset cartoon, a white, heteronormative HUMAN family--Dad, Mom with blonde hair, and two boys--is gazing excitedly into a bowl full of tiny critters. Text: "Enter the Wonderful World of Amazing Sea-Monkeys! Own a BOWLFULL of HAPPINESS! Instant Pets! Just add water--that's all! In one second your amazing Sea-Monkeys actually come to life! Yes they hatch instantly, right before your eyes. Now simply grow and enjoy the most adorable pets ever to bring smiles, laughter, and fun into your home. SO EAGER TO PLEASE, THEY CAN EVEN BE TRAINED! Always clowning around, these frolicsome pets swim, stunt, and play games with each other. Because they are so full of tricks, you'll never tire of watching them. And raising Sea-monkeys is so easy, even a six year old can do so without help. Sea-Monkeys eat very little, and they keep their water so clean, they require only a minimum care although they LOVE attention. Anyone who enjoys the company of pets will ADORE Sea-Monkeys.Best of all, we even teach them to obey your commends like a pack of friendly trained seals. What a way to surprise your guests.]

Scanned from the Sep-Oct 1973 Justice League of America, no 107.

Open Wide...

Generally Awful

image of Mitt Romney shaking hands in a crowd, caught with an expression that makes it look like he's roaring, to which I've added a dialogue bubble reading: 'Rrrrwwwaaarrrr!!! I am looking for a flag! Aaarrrggghhh!!! Have you seen my flag? Rrrrwwwaaarrrr!!!'
Mitt Romney, just doing normal campaign stuff.

In today's totally trenchant election news, Team Romney has launched its first general election ad campaign, and, naturally, it's hilarious. The spot opens with the question, "What would a Romney presidency be like?" HA HA TERRIBLE! That is definitely the perfect question to ask—the one that makes me LOL and yell "SO TERRIBLE! HIS PRESIDENCY WOULD BE THE WORST!"

Text Onscreen: "What would a Romney Presidency be like?" (HA HA GARBAGE!)

Male voiceover, over images of Romney campaigning: "What would a Romney Presidency be like?" (HA HA VILE!)

Text Onscreen: "Day 1."

Male voiceover, over images of industry and people working, then over more images of Romney campaigning: "Day one—President Romney immediately approves the Keystone Pipeline, creating thousands of jobs that Obama blocked. (Please note how candidate Romney is called PRESIDENT ROMNEY, but President Obama is called OBAMA. Subliminal messaging I get, but holy lord that is some disrespectful shit, right there.) President Romney introduces tax cuts and reforms that will reward job creators, not punish them. President Romney issues orders to begin replacing Obamacare with common sense healthcare reform. That's what a Romney presidency will be like. (A dictatorship that evidently disbands Congress? Cool.)

Mitt Romney voiceover, over black and white photograph of him holding hands with his wife: I'm Mitt Romney, and I approve this message.
Text in parentheses mine, in case that wasn't evident.

What a terrific campaign advert! Good job, Mitt Romney! You continue to be the best that the GOP has to offer, apparently.

In other news, Newt Gingrich is back on the campaign trail, to convince his supporters to back Mitt Romney, whom Gingrich spent the entire campaign viciously attacking. Mitt Romney is so pleased, I'm sure.

Mitt Romney has also started vetting his veep picks. Ha ha pick Sarah Palin! She's great!

Meanwhile, President Obama is out there in the world, doing his thing. Which, during the election, will mainly consist of not being Mitt Romney.

Talk about these things! Or don't. Whatever makes you happy. Life is short.

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime



Chuck Brown and the Soul Searchers: "Bustin' Loose"

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

"I'm not familiar precisely with exactly what I said, but I stand by what I said, whatever it was."—GOP Presidential Candidate and Professor of Geniusology at Integrity University Mitt Romney, on his previous and current positions on using the Reverend Jeremiah Wright to attack President Barack Obama.

Solid candidate, Republicans. Great job.

Open Wide...

Trayvon Martin Updates

[Content Note: Violence; racism; victim-blaming.]

Three new news items to share:

1. Orlando SentinelEncounter between George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin 'avoidable,' cops said in report: "Sanford police believed the encounter between George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin was 'ultimately avoidable' if Zimmerman had 'remained in his vehicle and awaited the arrival of law enforcement'." In their coverage of the same item, USA Today reports the police document also notes: "Zimmerman had reported 'suspicious persons, all young black males' to police on three previous occasions in 2011."

2. MSNBC—Trayvon Martin killed by single gunshot fired from 'intermediate range,' autopsy shows: "Florida teenager Trayvon Martin died from a single gunshot wound to the chest fired from 'intermediate range,' according to an autopsy report reviewed Wednesday by NBC News." That conflicts with previous reports saying the gun was pressed against Martin's chest when fired, which are based on a conclusion drawn by a Florida Department of Law Enforcement firearms expert from the presence of powder burns on Martin's hoodie and shirt.

3. New York Daily NewsTrayvon Martin had marijuana in system the night he was gunned down: "Trayvon Martin had marijuana in his system the night he was gunned down in a Florida condo complex, according to a medical report released Thursday. Martin's autopsy report shows he had traces of THC, the active ingredient in pot, in his blood and urine."

Guess which one of these is getting the most attention?

If you guessed "Trayvon Martin was HIGH!" give yourself 1,000 points, then please donate them to the Center for Constitutional Rights.

Apparently, in the US in the year 2012, you still need to say out loud that even if someone uses weed, that is not a justification for killing them.

And, you know, during the fully one million times I have smoked weed in my life and then walked down a street, no one has called the cops on me and/or tried to murder me. That's not a coincidence. That's evidence of racism which privileges my high white ass.

UPDATE: Think Progress also has an item today about Zimmerman being a racist bully at work. And eventually getting fired for incessant complaints to HR about his colleagues.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

A picture of the McDonaldland character The Hamburglar.

Robble robble robble robble Hamburglar robble robble.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

If you could be a contestant on any reality competition or gameshow, which would you choose?

"I would never be on any of those shows in a million fucking years" is also a viable answer.

In fact, it would be my answer, were it not for the existence of the Amazing Race. I would love to be on the Amazing Race, despite my patent inability to travel/move/live without pain, drive a stick-shift, or run flat-out for at least a quarter-mile, lol.

Iain and I like to watch the Amazing Race and decide which one of us would do which individual tasks. He'd do all the eating gross stuff ones. I'd do all the dangling from, climbing on, jumping off, or balancing on high places ones. If he even glimpses a bungee cord, he exclaims, "YOURS!"

Open Wide...

BushQuotes!

Chapter 3, page 36: "Long pause."

That is an actual quote from the page, the entirety of which recounts a hunting anecdote I've no interest in sharing.

You're welcome.

[From George Bush's A Charge to Keep, gifted to me by Deeky, because he hates me. In the US, all people who plan to run for president write a shitty book. (Some are less shitty than others, by which I mean the Democrats' books.) A Charge to Keep was George W. Bush's shitty I-wanna-be-president book, published in 1999. I am blogging one random quote per page every day until I have either made my way through the book or lost it behind a couch.]

Open Wide...

Assvertising

by Shaker QLH, who has a very cute dog.

[Content Note: Fat hatred, body policing, food policing, and bullying.]

I was watching Hulu the other night when, with no warning, something disgusting happened all over my monitor.

It was a Geico commercial, part of their "easier way to save" series. Perhaps you've been subjected to it, too. The premise is: A middle-class, middle-aged white man hires a trio of thin teenaged girls to fat-shame him, supposedly as a cheap alternative to a weight-loss program.

White middle-aged man in button-down shirt and tie, sitting alone on a couch as if for an interview. He says, "Weight-loss programs can be expensive, so to save some money I just got the popular girls from the local middle school to follow me around." Cut to the man in his home at night, wearing a t-shirt, opening refrigerator in darkened kitchen. He pulls a sandwich on plate from the fridge and sniffs it. At the sound of voices, he turns around; we see the trio of "popular girls" standing there.

Girls: Ew. Seriously? So gross.

He gives the food another look, as if guiltily reconsidering, and puts the plate back in the fridge. Cut to a scene in a brightly lit diner. A plate of waffles with whipped cream and strawberries is delivered to his table. As the plate is set before the man, the girls lean over from the adjacent booth.

Girls: Ew. Seriously? That is so gross.

His shoulders slump dejectedly and he reaches for the menu. Cut to a scene in a parking lot at night. The man is alone in his car, dressed in a hooded sweatshirt over a t-shirt, eating a burger, with an open fast food bag at his side. Through the car windows, the fast food establishment is visible. A flash pops; the girls are at his car window and one has just taken a photograph of him biting into the burger. Mustard and ketchup are smeared on his cheek.

Girls: Ew. Seriously? Dude, that is so totally gross.

The man sighs and tosses the burger back into the bag. "Gross, I know," he says.

Male voiceover, over Geico logo: There's an easier way to save. Geico. Fifteen minutes could save you 15% or more.
This commercial inspires me with many impulses. Among them is the desire to buy my insurance anywhere besides Geico.

Stacy Bias has done a good job of teasing out some of the nuances of the bullshit on parade here.
Main dude's a moderately chubby white guy, clearly a professional, but made to be a schlubby one as he's wearing a button-up shirt and tie, but no jacket. This gives the impression straight-away of mediocrity. He sits submissively, with his hands folded in his lap and his expression is alternately eager and dull. He's the underdog 'everyman', likable but visibly flawed, a little bit lonely (he's never shown with anyone else, save the tormenting triad), intelligent but lacking in common sense and self-control. He's passive, approval-seeking, malleable and clearly unsatisfied with himself.

The teen girls are not just any teens. They are the "popular girls" and, for the purpose of this ad, that detail is important. This guy could have been a family man; he could have hired his daughter and her friends or the girls from next door. Instead, he is pictured as single and the iconic 'unattainables' of male adolescent fantasy are called in to provide a metaphor for his lack of sexual currency and respect from self and others. He is transported by his lack of will-power from his agency and authority as an adult male back into the role of the bullied and rejected youth.

Note the secret eating (in his car, alone, in a parking lot, late at night – the paparazzi-flash of the teen girls' camera phone capturing his mustard-stained cheek and indicating this as a humiliating moment that risks his social exposure), the seeming 'childishness' of his food choices (the strawberry waffles, thick with whipped cream and covered in sprinkles), slovenliness (an uncovered sandwich, bread half-off, pulled from the fridge in an old t-shirt, indicating inactivity.) Each of these stereotypical representations further naturalizes the myth of the fat individual as a byproduct of weak-will, poor food choices, excessive consumption and inactivity. They also reinforce the hierarchy of thin vs. fat wherein it is socially acceptable to critique others bodies and/or eating habits providing they appear to be less healthy than yours.
This commercial suggests not only that it's funny to fat-shame people, but that it's effective. That by fat-shaming and food-shaming people, you're helping them. And that when people shame you, you should immediately change your behaviors and make different choices, lest they do it again.

The commercial also posits that fat-shaming should include both food- and behavior-policing. In one scenario, the man is eating fast food, which can be high in fat and sodium, and overly processed, and may not be a good nutritional choice for the individual character in this commercial, which people apparently no longer need a professional nutritionist who's aware of one's budget, everyday eating habits, etc. to assess, because judgmental teenaged girls are a sufficient alternative. (Ah, the summer job opportunities I missed in my youth!) But he's eating it alone, in his car, at night, as if it's something secret, something shameful, and he's eating so quickly and greedily that he's smearing it on his face, which is exactly how those gluttonous fatties eat, amirite? Self-control and napkins are for thin people!

The girls comment on his food, but then one of them additionally takes a picture of him. Since we all know that fat people are constantly stuffing food into their faces, seeing a fat person eat shouldn't be all that remarkable, but of course the point isn't that what he's doing is so extraordinary it warrants a snapshot, but that his shameful behavior must be documented and exposed.

In another scenario, he's eating leftovers. I don't know how he even has access to leftovers, because he apparently lives alone and everyone knows that fat people are so goddamned greedy that they never leave a crumb behind, but let's suspend disbelief for the sake of selling insurance and pretend that he'd been gorging himself in a food-smearing frenzy earlier and a morsel of food had escaped unscathed. So he's eating leftovers. He's alone again, at night again, and once more the scene has the sense of him sneaking food, of him engaging in shameful behavior. There's the implication, as in the car-eating scenario, that the girls are policing both the food itself and his behavior.

In the other scenario, he's eating in public in a diner during daylight, not sneaking food secretively at night. Presumably, he's going to eat it right at that table, not squirrel it away in shame. But who does he think he is to indulge in such a delicious and beautiful meal right out in the daylight like that? Fat people eating openly in the daylight without guilt is almost as terrible as fat people eating secretively in the nighttime wracked with shame! Plus, waffles with whipped cream are self-indulgent (and a little feminine). Gross!

(Who calls waffles gross? These girls are not from Pawnee!)

What are we to take from this? That the food is gross; that the man's behavior is gross; that the simple sight of this man eating is objectively gross; that this man himself is gross, as all fat people most certainly are.

What's clearly not gross, though, is shaming other people. Shaming other people is a good thing! Bullying is helpful! It's totally a valid problem-solving approach! And being fat is definitely a problem; you should definitely get to work on that immediately. Even if you're not fat yourself (and our definition of "fat" absolutely extends to include this guy, because he's as fat as we can safely portray on television without endangering children), you should feel very good about policing other people's behavior. We encourage you to examine and comment on what other people put into their own bodies. It's for their own good, you know. They'll be grateful for it! Trust us! We sell insurance!

It was especially smart of him, don't you think, to hire teenaged popular girls to shame him. Mean girls, as we all know, are ubiquitous and can be found at any school in the USA. It would've been ineffective to hire boys, who aren't as adept at bullying behavior, what with girls being so much more uniquely cruel. And more vocal about their opinions! I know that many of the middle-aged white men I know are very quick to change their behavior based on the opinions of teenaged girls. So that's certainly accurate.

Except that it's not accurate at all, and it suggests that something's wrong with him to be so affected by the words of teenaged girls (who, when they're not strutting around like sadistic hyenas, are frivolous and silly and don't understand how the world works, according to pop culture and conventional wisdom). He's a loser, you see. And a fat loser is certainly something new and different on my TV screen.

Also, bullying is funny. We've all definitely learned that by now.

Maybe, instead of investing in a trio of popular girls, he could invest in a meeting with a nutritionist. Or buy a HAES book.

And maybe, instead of buying my insurance from Geico, I'll choose another company. I don't want Geico putting "mean girls" in my backseat to mutter derogatory comments about my driving habits! If waffles are gross, how do they feel about a left turn signal? Disgusted, I'll bet!

There's so much to discuss here, we really should praise Geico for packing all of that garbage into a short thirty seconds. And by "praise," of course I mean "send contemptuous letters of disgust."

Contact Geico.

Open Wide...