
"What?"

"What?"

"What?!"
This blogaround brought to you by gently falling snow.
Recommended Reading:
scatx: On Mandated Transvaginal Ultrasounds [Content Note: The post at this link contains an image of and discussion of transvaginal ultrasounds.]
Tami: Whitney's "Home Going" and the Spiritual Divide [Content Note: The post at this link contains discussion of racism and Othering.]
Lisa: Welcome Back 1950s - We missed you...um...not really. [Content Note: The post at this link contains discussion of sexual violence, stalking, and the effects of limiting reproductive choice.]
Alex: Gamers Launch Harassment Campaign Against BioWare Writer [Content Note: The post at this link contains discussion of harassment, threats, misogyny, and homophobia.]
Eesha: Hillary Clinton Says "Culture" Is No Excuse for Female Genital Cutting
s.e.: Reproductive Parts [Content Note: The post at this link contains discussion of the dehumanization associated with limiting reproductive choice.]
Fannie: So, You Want To Teach the Lady Feminists?
Echidne: Defiant Hair! On Michelle Duggar's Tips For All Subjugated Wives.
Grace: Meaningful Accountability vs. Silencing Criticism [Content Note: The post at this link contains discussion of violence, predation, and abuse.]
Andy: Obama Sings 'Sweet Home Chicago' at the White House
Finally: Do you want to know how much it would cost to build the Death Star? Sure you do!
Leave your links and recommendations in comments...
[Content Note: Reproductive rights; ableism.]
Related to this previous thought about the efficacy of contraception as a wedge issue, I'm also seeing a lot of variations on the argument that conservatives' attack on contraception is really exposing their grody retrofuck attitudes about sex and/or women.
And I keep wondering: Exposing it to whom?
Are there people who really don't know or understand that a significant segment of the US' rightwing are deeply hostile to notions of consent, autonomy, and choice? Are undeterrably anti-choice? Are of the fervent belief that women's primary function is babymaking?
It is my estimation that pretty much everyone already knows that. The problem that led us to this moment is not ignorance; the problem is that the vast majority of the people who don't share the extremists' view did not take them seriously, and did not view this assault on reproductive rights—including contraception—as a logical outgrowth of an extreme anti-choice and anti-feminist position, but instead dismissed it out of hand with smug ableism: They're crazy. They're wackos. They're nutbags. They're batshit nuts. They're the lunatic fringe.
Nope. They're very rational, patient, determined, and methodical actors, who have been quietly waging war on reproductive rights in state legislatures for decades.
They're not insane. They're cruel and they're wrong.
They're also very well-funded, and happy to be ignored, dismissed as maniacs, so they can toil away in the blessed darkness of inattention.
They're also, by the way, extremely appreciative that feminist critics sounding the alarm have been similarly dismissed as paranoid hysterics, as well.
What is being exposed is not their attitude. What is being exposed is their influence—and the regrettable ways in which progressives have actually abetted it.
Whoops.

GOOD MORNING! If you are still maintaining maximum enthusiasm for the TOTALLY EXCITING AND VERY AWESOME Republican Primary, please check this box: □
If you failed to check the enthusiasm box, perhaps this will help pump your enthusiasm back to maximum enthusiosity:




Here is all the news I don't want to write about today:
INSERT EVERY ONE OF THE EIGHT BILLION STORIES I'VE READ ABOUT VARIOUS LEGISLATION AND/OR LEGISLATORS AND/OR RELIGIOUS PEOPLE AND/OR GENERAL CATEGORY FUCKOS WHO WANT TO CODIFY INTO LAW THAT I AM NOTHING MORE THAN A UTERUS WITH SOME MEAT AROUND IT.
That's right. I can't even write about FOR REALZ the news I don't want to write about today. It is too depressing and rage-making and terrifying, and I am too full of contempt to function!
Okay, one thing! I will mention ONE THING as perfectly emblematic of the abject fuckery with which we're dealing up in this garbage fart of a democracy: Illinois farming committee passes two anti-abortion bills.
Yeah, you read that right! The Illinois State House's AGRICULTURE AND CONSERVATION COMMITTEE is fucking around with abortion, because it's the only committee conservative enough to PASS THIS SHIT.
In opposition, protestors wore t-shirts reading: "Women are NOT livestock."
HA HA, I thought upon reading that grim report, BY THE TIME THE REPUBLICANS ARE DONE WITH US, WE'LL ASPIRE TO BE FUCKING LIVESTOCK.
www.fuckeverything.fart
![Republican presidential candidate, former U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum reacts to a comment from the crowd after a news conference on February 17, 2012 in Columbus, Ohio. [Getty Images] image of Rick Santorum holding up his hand in protest and making a face](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v642/shakespeares_sister/shakes4/x610-11.jpg)
[Content Note: The video below includes footage of Dudley making growly sounds and both Dudley and Zelly baring their teeth at each other. They're just playing, but they are play-fighting, so if dog aggression is triggering or otherwise problematic for you, you should skip this video.]
Mostly, Dudley and Zelda play straight-up chase in the backyard, but sometimes they mix it up by throwing a little Bitey Game into the mix—which makes for loads of tumbling cuteness as Zelly dives and rolls to escape Dudz. My favorite is when she rolls and then pops up right into a play-bow. Megadorbz! I finally managed to record a bit of it.
[Content Note: Rape culture.]
This past weekend, Maya Rudolph—whom, as I may have mentioned once or twice, ahem, I love like a loved thing made from love with lots of little lovey bits all over it—hosted SNL, and it was pretty terrific. It was approximately eleventy billion times better with a professional doing the hosting, not searching for cue cards every five seconds, and, unless I'm mistaken (I was chatting with Iain and Kenny Blogginz through some of the broadcast, as per usual), they managed to air an entire episode without rape jokes! IMAGINE THAT!
Even better: Amy Poehler dropped by for some of the skits, and to do a very memorable "REALLY?!? With Seth and Amy" in which Poehler and Seth Meyers tackled Darrell Issa's contraception hearing (Meyers: "Meanwhile, both Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum use the rhythm method, and, with five and eight kids respectively, it seems like they might have even less rhythm than we thought."), Foster Friess' aspirin-between-the-knees gag (Poehler: "Well, we'd love to accept your apology, Foster, but you made a mistake, and now you're going to have to live with that mistake for the rest of your life. REALLY!"), and Virgina's proposed bill to mandate transvaginal ultrasounds before abortions (Poehler: "Now, don't get me wrong: I love Transvaginal—it's my favorite airline! I got so many miles on Transvaginal that I always get updated to Ladybusiness!").
Better still: Maya Rudolph and Amy Poehler together again for "Bronx Beat." As a person who spent her childhood summers listening to the ladies talking on the stoops in my grandmother's Queens neighborhood, I always love this sketch with the passion of 10,000 suns. "It's 2012! We're all gonna die anyway! Live your life!" Done and done!
Also loved: The Maya Angelou Prank Show and Cosby Obama.
But my favorite of the night was the "Super Showcase" sketch, in which Maya Rudolph and Kristen Wiig lampooned "The Price Is Right" merchandize models. There was nothing about the sketch that was super innovative or searingly clever: It was just Rudolph and Wiig speaking with the same funny cadence and acting supremely silly. Then: The best of all SNL moments—Wiig broke, then Rudolph almost broke, then Bill Hader (playing the gameshow host) broke. Comedy gold.
These are seriously some of the most pathetic people on the planet:
Charles Cooper, the lead attorney for the proponents of Proposition 8, tells Metro Weekly that the proponents of the California marriage amendment will be asking the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to review the three-judge panel decision issued on Feb. 7 holding that Proposition 8 is unconstitutional.More projection of the catastrophically irony-impaired: Nary a same-sex marriage has ever undermined an opposite-sex marriage, but these opposite-sexly married bozos have spent an inordinate amount of time, energy, and money to undermine same-sex marriages in California.
Although Cooper, of Cooper and Kirk PLLC, told Metro Weekly the filing has not yet been made, the filing is expected later today as today is the deadline for the filing to seek en banc review.
The move almost guarantees that the U.S. Supreme Court will not consider the case before this November's presidential election.
...After en banc consideration, the unsuccessful party could then petition the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the case. At that point, the parties submit written arguments explaining to the court why the justices should or should not hear the case. Then, if four of the nine justices agree to hear the case, another round of briefing occurs, with the parties and outside organizations and individuals arguing the merits of the case to the justices. Oral arguments are then set and held at the Supreme Court, and some time later a decision is handed down.



Find out how to get involved here. Donate with a credit card here, or with alternate payment options (like PayPal) here.


Copyright 2009 Shakesville. Powered by Blogger. Blogger Showcase
Blogger Templates created by Deluxe Templates. Wordpress by K2