Photos of the Day

Hey, remember when I said how there were SO MANY great wire photos from CPAC of angry white conservatives and Herman Cain screaming from patriotic podiums and furiously pointing while definitely saying things like "Obamacare" and "handouts"...? Of course you remember! It was only yesterday! Well just LOOK at these crumblebuns!

image of Rick Perry pointing
That is Rick Perry! He is definitely angry and pointing!

image of Mitt Romney pointing
That is Mitt Romney! He is sooooooooooo angry and pointing!

image of Mike Huckabee pointing
That is Mike Huckabee! He is totes angry and pointing!

image of Newt Gingrich pointing
That is Newt Gingrich! He is super angry and pointing!

image of Herman Cain pointing
That is Herman Cain! He is very angry and pointing!

image of Ann Coulter pointing
That is Ann Coulter! She is for sure angry and pointing!

image of Marco Rubio pointing
That is Marco Rubio! He is pretty miffed and pointing!

image of Mitch McConnell pointing
That is Mitch McConell, and that is definitely his angry face. He is pointing!

image of Michele Bachmann pointing
That is Michele Bachmann, whose angry pointing is, frankly, kind of weak sauce.

image of John Boehner pointing
That is John Boehner! He is sooooo over it and pointing!

image of Bob McDonnell pointing
That is Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell, who ain't angry at all
the hot conservative tail he thinks he's gonna get at CPAC!

image of John Boehner pointing
That is Rick Santorum showing why he is the new frontrunner.
Rick Santorum don't point. Rick Santorum is a fister!

And thus ends another moving episode of "Looking at Angry Conservatives Pointing at Things," with Melissa McEwan. Fin.

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

Happy (3rd) Birthday Rosie!






And, really, what is the fun in sitting still long enough to get a non-blurry picture when there are Things To Be Watched From My Perch and brand new birthday toys to chew on?

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

[Content Note: Reproductive rights.]

"This is the kind of coercion we can expect. It's not about contraception. It's about government control of our lives and it's got to stop."—Republican presidential candidate and EXTREME ANTI-CHOICER Rick Santorum, on the Obama administration's contraceptive policy, at CPAC today.

Said, presumably, without a trace of fucking irony.

lulz

Open Wide...

An Observation

I've had at least five people defriend me on Facebook since I started using my new avatar:

Open Wide...

The Parks and Rec Open Thread

There was no new Parks and Rec episode last night (BOO!), but we didn't have an Open Thread for last week's Galentine's Day episode, so let's talk it about now, okay?! OKAY!

image of Leslie Knope Happy Galentine's Day card featuring hearts reading Power, Wisdom, Ladies

My absolute favorite part of this episode was Chris' DJing while he was super depressed. That was LITERALLY the worst Valentine's Day music I have ever heard.

Also, scatx and I were both rewatching the ice rink grand entrance scene ("Get on your feet!") from the previous episode like 9,000 times this week, because nerdz, and, while I was watching it on the 8,573rd time and laughing until I cried, I was also thinking about how genuinely radical the Leslie Knope character really is, and how radical a plotline it is that she's got a male partner who is profoundly supportive of her career.

That there wasn't an arc about his "coming to terms" with her career, that it was just taken as read that he was going to be her ally because her ambition was part of what he loves about her, is a really revolutionary departure from the familiar rom-com construction of a dude who "learns" how to love am ambitious woman only after he sees that trying to crush her dreams makes her unhappy. (Quelle surprise!) Ben is already a fully-realized equal partner, who wasn't written to "grow" for the benefit of men in the audience who are assumed to be unable to relate to a man like that.

I feel like P&R is saying to those men: We won't indulge your tiresome discomfort with ambitious women. We expect more.

And, in doing so, it's also acknowledging that there are men in the world who are and have been unconditionally supportive of their female partners' ambition, who navigate without some boner-killing identity crisis the negotiations and compromises innate to any two-career partnership. Ben, I thought, is kind of a gift to them. Here YOU are. We see you.

Tangentially: One of the things that I always think makes P&R the most feminist show on television is that there's no regular foil for Leslie's feminism, even outwith her romantic relationship. Ron is the obvious candidate for that role, but he doesn't actually fill it. He continually recognizes Leslie's competency and general awesomeness. But I digress.

I also had this sort of related thought about how radical it is that all of this is taking place in small-town red(dish) state America. I live in a small town in Indiana, and I'm involved enough in local politics I've got the mayor's cell phone number, you know? This show is about women like me. And it speaks to me, reflects some of the realities of being a feminist outside a media/creative career in a major urban center, in ways that shows like The Mary Tyler Moore Show or Murphy Brown never did, even though I love those shows.

(It's also one of several fundamental differences between P&R and 30 Rock, which is a show I don't like.)

Being a feminist here, and being a feminist when I lived in Chicago for a decade, can in some ways be two very different things. I like seeing that acknowledged by P&R.

So, anyway. Those are my thoughts! What are yours?

Open Wide...

Friday Blogaround

This blogaround brought to you by limes.

Recommended Reading:

M: Whitman in Louisville: Samantha's "I Sing the Body Electric"

Tami: Black Woman, Know Your Place: Cornel West Clings to His Privilege

Peter: Civil Liberties Hypocrites

Kathleen: Jaroslav Flegr and the Cat Parasites Messing with Our Brains

Josh: Pinterest Is Quietly Generating Revenue by Modifying User Submitted Pins

Jessie: On the Un-Fair Campaign [Content Note: The post at this link discusses racism and white privilege.]

Andy: Gay North Dakota Couple of More Than 20 Years Denied Marriage License

Leave your links and recommendations in comments...

Open Wide...

Primarily Horrendo

image of people walking past a cardboard cut-out of Rick Santorum at CPAC
People walk past a cardboard cutout of Republican US presidential candidate Rick Santorum at the American Conservative Union's annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Washington, February 9, 2012. [REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst]
In my mind, the soundtrack to that image is this song.

Anyway! I sort of lost the plot with the primary news this morning, after the BIG ANNOUNCEMENT that President Obama was kinda sorta caving but not really (?!) to conservative religious bullies. The one GOOD THING about this election is that, no matter which of the two major parties you support, you can feel safe in the guarantee that the healthcare of women and other people with uteri will always be regarded as a TOTALLY NEGOTIABLE ITEM.

"My uterus is a bargaining chip!"—Me, every election in my lifetime.

Speaking of misogyny, Rick Santorum, Good Christian, says he has concerns about women in combat roles because "that could be a very compromising situation, where people naturally may do things that may not be in the interest of the mission because of other types of emotions that are involved. It already happens, of course, with the camaraderie of men in combat, but I think it would be even more unique if women were in combat."

Sure. Like, what if I were on the frontlines in Afghanistan, and I saw an enemy combatant who I thought was super dreamy? I would probably abandon my post to go make out with him, and then tell him to shoot the dudes in my unit. So Rick Santorum, as usual, definitely has a point.

In other news, the surging Santorum is cleaning up the grody Newt Gingrich leftovers. Sloppy Seconds Santorum! That's what we used to call him at the roller rink back in the '80s.

What does that even mean? I don't know. Here's a picture.

photoshopped image of 80s rollerskaters, with dude's face replaced by Santorum's

In Mitt Romney news, Mitt Romney is meeting privately with conservative leaders at CPAC, "in an effort to reassure Republicans who remain skeptical about his candidacy." Ha ha GOOD LUCK, Mitt Romney! I hope your party is fun and that its attendees enjoy the party favors! By which I mean THE BRIBES!

Something something Ron Paul. Liberty. Freedom. Gold standard. Honest rape.

image of Rick Santorum looking down at something and making a face
Rick Santorum reading this post: "That roller skater isn't even me!"

Talk about these things! Or don't. Whatever makes you happy. Life is short.

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime



PJ Harvey: "Down By The Water"

Open Wide...

Obama Blinks on Birth Control

Swell: White House to Announce Contraception Rule 'Accommodation' for Religious Organizations.

With the White House under fire for its new rule requiring employers including religious organizations to offer health insurance that fully covers birth control coverage, ABC News has learned that later today the White House — possibly President Obama himself — will likely announce an attempt to accommodate these religious groups.
Adding cowardice upon cowardice—caving, and announcing it in the Friday News Hole.
One source familiar with the decision described the accommodation as "Hawaii-plus," insisting that it's better than the Hawaii plan — for both sides.

In Hawaii the employer is responsible for referring employees to places where they can obtain the contraception; Catholic leaders call that material cooperation with evil. But what the White House will likely announce later today is that the relationship between the religious employer and the insurance company will not need to have any component involving contraception. The insurance company will reach out on its own to the women employees. This is better for both sides, the source says, since the religious organizations do not have to deal with medical care to which they object, and women employees will not have to be dependent upon an organization strongly opposed to that care in order to obtain it.
Let's be clear about what this means: An additional burden is being placed on women to accommodate the bullshit objections of a vocal minority who are playing politics with religion to complain about a policy the central mandate of which has been law for over a decade.

All of this "religious freedom" malarkey is the invocation of false ethics by some of the most unethical, cynical, opportunistic jerks in the country. This isn't an issue of "religious freedom." They're forcing Obama's hand, seeing if they can get him to throw women's healthcare and equality under the bus again.

And he just blinked.

UPDATE: The administration's position is that it's really no big deal because women will still get free contraception coverage—women who are employed by religious institutions will just get it directly from their insurers rather than through their employers. I still have some grave concerns.

Open Wide...

Religious Freedom

The hue and cry being raised by some members of the Catholic church hierarchy and some opportunistic members of Congress over the Obama administration's requirement that employers provide contraception to their employees reminds me that their argument of religious freedom and how the evil federal government is stomping all over it applies to more than just pills and condoms.

I belong to a religious denomination that is adamantly opposed to war in any form and to the manufacture and sale of it. The Quakers were founded on this tenet, they have suffered for it, including torture, exile, and even death, yet they haven't changed their position in five hundred years. As a Quaker, I too am opposed to war and its trappings to the point that I registered as a conscientious objector in 1970. And yet my taxes go to the Treasury every year; taxes I am sure go to support the Department of Defense and our war machine. I'm pretty sure that with my income, my contribution to their budget over the last forty years wouldn't buy a Snickers bar at the Pentagon canteen, but my money somehow, some way still ends up in their coffers. But I dutifully file my income taxes, collect my refund, and attend meeting nearly every Sunday. So why am I not out in the street waving a sign about it (as some Friends do) or calling up my congress-critters to get them to pass a bill that would allow me or my fellow Friends to opt out of paying a portion of our taxes to kill people?

It's because I realize that this is a world where there are people out there who want to kill us no matter how peaceful my intentions are, and in a real world, we need to have a Department of Defense. I would like it if we didn't have to have it, but I know reality when I see it. (I would also like to be a well-built billionaire who could fly.) Second, even if I was bound and determined to put an end to war and war taxes, I don't have the political clout, the money, or the fancy clothes to convince my member of Congress to put forth a bill that would provide me or the other members of peace churches with the privilege to opt out of paying war taxes on religious grounds. Nor do I have the clout to get the state legislature to pass a bill that allows my church to recognize and perform same-sex weddings, which is in keeping with our meeting's dedication to equality for all, or the right of women to have autonomy over their own bodies.

For every church out there that is opposed to all of the culture war issues, there is at least one or more that supports the other side. And yet they're drowned out in the noise by the well-funded and the well-connected. The evangelical bullies have tried to claim ownership of the Christian brand and claim that no true Christian would support forcing employers to pay for something they oppose. And yet there are a lot of other Christians -- and non-Christians who are affiliated with them (you don't have to believe in God or Jesus to be a Quaker, you know) -- that want those employers to provide for the health and well-being of their employees, including whatever it takes to keep them that way.

There are probably more Catholics in Miami-Dade County than there are Quakers in the whole world. The annual lobbying budget for the Catholic Church could fund the Friends Committee on National Legislation (FCNL) for life. There isn't one Quaker on the Supreme Court, and there are probably more Muslims in Congress than Friends. So maybe that's why my religious freedom is being denied as a matter of course and nobody's getting on MSNBC like Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council (who seems to have his own dressing room there) to advocate for my absolutist religious view that war is murder and same-sex couples have a right to get married.

Or maybe it's because I and people like me realize that in this world, some things are more important for the greater good of the people than my own particular point of view. That has been a part of what I learned both as a Quaker and as an adult: my religious freedoms end when they harm the rights of others. That doesn't mean I'll surrender them, but being an absolutist doesn't win an argument; it ends it.

Here endeth the lesson. Peace.

Cross-posted from Bark Bark Woof Woof.

Open Wide...

Blog Note

Yes, comments are fubared again, for reasons out of our control, as we have not changed any settings or messed with the formatting in any way.

I have notified Disqus, who will hopefully resolve the problem soon.

My apologies for the inconvenience.

UPDATE: All right, I figured it out. Something in our back-end settings keeps getting reset to a selection we don't make. I don't know why this happens over and over, but I've asked Disqus to look into it, so hopefully it can be prevented. I know it's a huge pain when the text goes tiny, but at least now I know what to do when it happens.

Please forgive me for addressing this on the blog and not responding to every email individually.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

An ice sculpture of a tiki.

Hosted by a tiki.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Following up on yesterday's QotD: What is your favorite movie (comedy or otherwise) that is just virtually devoid of women for no good reason?

(As opposed to, say, a film like The Shawshank Redemption, which takes place almost entirely in a men's prison, so the dearth of prominent female roles makes sense. That there are so many films made in male-centric environments is a whole other issue entirely.)

I don't know if this is precisely my favorite of the many possible answers to this question, but the first one that came to mind is The Usual Suspects. There's no good reason that one of the crooks couldn't have been female.

Imagine if Verbal Kint had been a lady. (!)

Open Wide...

Photos of the Day

OMG, y'all! There are SO MANY great wire photos from CPAC today! WOWEE WOW does that look like a fun place to be! I have literally just looked at HUNDREDS of photos of angry white conservatives and Herman Cain screaming from patriotic podiums! I can't even begin to imagine HOW SUPER DUPER FUN it is to be there!

Here are some of my FAVORITE PHOTOS that are NOT of angry people with veins popping out of their foreheads who are furiously pointing while definitely saying things like "Obamacare" and "handouts":

image of buttons featuring Ronald Reagan's face and reading 'Reagan 2012'

PERFECT. I mean, those buttons are almost TOO perfect, aren't they? If I ever see anything more perfecter than Reagan 2012 campaign pins, I will begin to fear for the dimensional stability of the multiverse.

a picture of Ron Paul surrounded by lots of little US flags

This is from the last CPAC because Ron Paul isn't attending this one, so Reuters is sending it out again: We miss you, Ron Paul! LYLAS! Stay sweet!

image of buttons reading 'I miss W'
Big seller, I'll bet. HUGE.

an image of a Dr. Seuss-like book mocking President Obama

That likeness is UNCANNY! (No, it isn't.) If there's one thing you can say about conservatives, it's that their totally racist and otherwise very inappropriate caricatures of President Obama are VERY GOOD. (Nope, they're not.)

image of former Vice President Dick Cheney smiling at the camera
Hey, look who it is! Looking good, Darth Creepious Mr. Vice President!

*wink!*

Open Wide...

Pack It Up. We're Done Here.

The Great American Experiment has officially failed:

Mississippi State Rep. Steve Holland, a Democrat, introduced a bill in the state's lower chamber calling for the part of the Gulf of Mexico that borders his state to be renamed the "Gulf of America."

A local Latino GOP organization called on Holland to withdraw the measure. "If this bill passes the legislature and is signed into law, perhaps it is time to rename the Mississippi River," wrote Bob Quasius, Café Con Leche's president, in the letter. "After all, sharing a name with a state that wants to rewrite maps out of disdain for Mexicans would be a disgrace to the rest of the nation."
All right, well, Bob Quasius might have bought us another year. Good one, Bob.

Someone please send Rep. Holland a memo informing him that Mexico is part of the Americas.

UPDATE: In comments, Shaker Anitanola links to a piece in which Holland asserts it's all a big joke to highlight that the GOP is failing to "feed, clothe and educate children, take care of older adults, provide economic development and high systems in this state." Um, okay. Suffice it to say I am unconvinced that pretend (?) racism that is indistinguishable from authentic racism is not a very effective strategy to expose the GOP's fuckery.

Open Wide...

"Someday, by god, I wanna throw a wedding for that kid."

As Deeky mentioned yesterday, the Washington House passed a bill which will allow same-sex couples to wed in the state, once Democratic Governor Chris Gregoire signs it into law. Two Republicans voted for the measure, one of whom was Representative Maureen Walsh, who gave this moving statement during the debate before the vote yesterday:

I don't wax as eloquently as most of the people on the floor here, but I have allowed my heart and mind to guide me on a lot of different decisions I've made in the legislature. I think sometimes that's what we have to do.

I too don't want to wag my finger at anybody about which way to vote on this. It's certainly an issue of conscience for me that I've been weighing very heavily for the past few weeks.

You know, I was married for 23 years to the love of my life and he died 6 years ago. I think of all the wonderful years we had and the wonderful fringe benefits of having 3 beautiful children. I don't miss the sex, and to me that's kind of what this boils down to. I don't miss that… I mean I certainly miss it, but it's certainly not the aspect of that relationship, that incredible bond I had with that human being, that I really really genuinely wish I still had. And so I just think to myself: how could I deny anyone the right to have that incredible bond with another individual in life. To me it seems almost cruel.

Years ago my daughter went to elementary school. Many of you have met my daughter she's a fabulous girl, she's wonderful, my boys are great too, but she's really something special. She was the light of her father's eye.

So she went to school and there were a whole group of kids picking on another kid, and you know, my daughter stuck up for that kid. Even though it wasn't the popular thing to do it was the right thing to do. I was never more proud of my kid than knowing she was speaking against the vocal majority on behalf of the rights of the minority. And to me, it is incumbent upon us as legislators in this state to do that. That is why we are here.

And I shudder to think that if folks who had preceded us in history did not do that, frankly I'm not sure I would be here as a woman. I'm not sure other people would be here due to their race or creed. And to me that is what's disconcerting.

And someone made the comment that this is not about equality. Well yes it is about equality. And why in the world would be not allow those equal rights for individuals who are truly committed to one another in life to be able to show that in the way of a marriage.

My daughter came out of the closet a couple of years ago and you know what I thought I was going to agonize about that. Nothing's different. She's still a fabulous human being and she met someone she loves very much. And some day, by God, I want to throw a wedding for that kid. And someday I hope that's what I can do. I hope she will not feel like a second-class citizen involved in something called a “domestic partnership” which frankly sounds like a Mary Maids franchise to me.

Thank you Mr. Speaker. That's all I want to say.
Video and transcript via BuzzFeed.

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Zelda the Black-and-Tan Mutt curled up on the sofa
Zelda has an unparalleled capacity to make herself look very big and very small.

P.S. Doritooooooooooooooooo earrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrs!!!!!!!

Open Wide...

Number of the Day

72: The number of hours in a mandated "waiting period" for abortion-seekers being proposed in Utah by state representative Steve Eliason, who is a Republican, of course.

Utah Rep. Steve Eliason (R) has proposed a bill (HB 461 [pdf]) that would require women to wait 72 hours before receiving abortion care, the Salt Lake Tribune reports. Under current law, women must wait 24 hours before receiving abortion services. If approved, Utah would have the same waiting period as South Dakota, which currently has the longest waiting period in the U.S.

Planned Parenthood Association of Utah has filed a lawsuit to overturn the law, arguing that it violates Roe v. Wade. The group said South Dakota's 72-hour waiting period puts an undue burden on women, who often have to travel long distances to reach the two abortion clinics in the state.

Eliason said the extension would give women the same amount of time "to make a major life decision" as "any consumer has to consider cancelling a mortgage."
I am really running out of ways to make the point that women and other people with uteri are not infants who are ignorant of their options (even though Republican-favored abstinence-only sex ed programs endeavor to turn them into exactly that). We don't need time to "really think it through" or "consider alternatives" or whatevthefuck Rep. Dipshit and the rest of the nation's Mendacious Band of Anti-Choice Fuckheads are alleging will happen in the three days they delay us from terminating a pregnancy.

Forcing a person to wait three days will not change the fact that zie does not want to have a child. Even if it changes hir mind about terminating the pregnancy, it doesn't change whatever circumstances brought hir to an abortion clinic in the first place.

Zie'll still walk out just as devoid of choices, just as un- or underemployed, just as broke, just as in debt, just as uninsured, just as lacking daycare, just as unable to care for hirself and/or hir existing children, just as in need of medication that zie can't take while pregnant, just as enmeshed in an unhealthy or abusive relationship, just the same as zie was when zie walked in.

Zie'll just have been guilted into making sacrifices zie doesn't want to make, to honor someone else's mistaken perceptions about hir morality.

All of these absurd barriers to termination are utter hogwash, rooted in the damnable fairy tale that women and other people with uteri are incapable of making the best decisions for themselves and their own bodies (and, frequently, for the children they already have).

The reality is this: There is an inextricable link between the economy, the funding of social services, and abortion. If "pro-lifers" really wanted women to want to have babies, they would start arguing for universal healthcare, just for a fucking start, considering about one-fourth of women seeking abortions cite their own health or possible health problems with the fetus as reasons for the termination, owing to concerns including "a lack of prenatal care."

But they're not pro-life. They're just anti-women.

And they can caterwaul about how that's not true all they fucking want, but, the truth is, they refuse to listen to women, and other people with uteri, to the millions of women who are telling them they don't need waiting periods or ultrasounds or parental/spousal consent or anti-abortion counselors or any of the other disincentives being proposed to deter them from terminating unwanted pregnancy, but do need jobs and healthcare and childcare and parental leave laws and associated institutional framework that supports successful parenthood.

And when you refuse to listen to women, your argument that you're not explicitly anti-women holds precious little water.

Particularly when your state has failed utterly to fund a robust social safety net, but has been trying, with various degrees of success, to chip away at Roe virtually since the decision granted people with uteri the right to terminate pregnancies.

[Via Steph Herold.]

Open Wide...

Teaspoon Time

Shaker Ashley in N.C. emails (which I am quoting with her permission): "I just wanted you to know that I called the White House today regarding tho odious Catholic Bishops (after getting busy signals all morning, I finally made it through this afternoon), and the woman who answered the phone was so happy to hear from me. She said I was one of the only people calling in support of reproductive freedom."

To the phones, Shakers!

White House comment line: (202) 456-1111

Related: Steered Wrong By Googling "Abortion Services"? It's No Accident. The civil war over reproductive rights is getting uglier by the day, and it was hideous already. We need to make sure we don't lose this one with the White House. Let's make sure President Obama hears from the USian majority who support reproductive freedom.

Open Wide...

Greyt Expectations

[Content Note: This post contains discussion of animal cruelty.]

image of Dudley the Greyhound, tilting his head and looking heartbreakingly sweet
This is Dudley.

Dudley didn't have the greatest start in life. He was bred to be a racer, which meant that from his earliest days, he lived a kind of life no dog should ever live. He resided at a track in Sarasota, Florida, where, like all racing greyhounds, he was virtually starved, left unvaccinated and unprotected against parasites, denied toys and affection, and confined for more than 20 hours a day to one-half of a double-decker cage in an unheated and uncooled kennel that looked like a warehouse. He barely had room to stand, and he ran on a track that didn't make enough money to be properly maintained. His last race ended in a collision that terminated his career before he was two years old.

And he was one of the lucky ones.

Most greyhound pups are bred at breeding farms, where "only a select few actually become racing dogs. This massive over-breeding is done in order to produce winning dogs. The unwanted pups, those who don't measure up to racing standards, are simply destroyed. The racing industry also sells some of the dogs considered unfit for racing to laboratories, which use them in experiments."

Of the dogs who become racers, most aren't champions—and many would-be champions are injured before they ever reach their potential. Most of the dogs who fail to make money are destroyed in the cheapest way possible, frequently by gunshot or having their throats cut. Some are simply left to starve. Even the most successful racers are usually retired by age 4, at which point they, too, are killed unless they are fortunate enough to be rescued.

Even with rescues doing as much as they can, as many as 20,000 dogs are still killed (and nearly half that number of rabbits illegally used to train the dogs) each year in the US alone.

The dogs are not beloved pets; they are property. And they are treated thus. In one infamous case, an owner told a trainer not to bother trying to rescue dogs from a kennel which had gone up in flames, because "they're insured." Greyhounds' lives have no innate value at the track.

I will spare you descriptions of the abuses I have seen in pictures taken at greyhound tracks. I will spare you photos of the dogs the local rescue with which I volunteer has rescued from tracks in Florida and elsewhere, so thin it's inconceivable that they are still alive.

I will tell you that most of this is totally legal, because greyhound racing was made an exception to the US Department of Agriculture's Animal Welfare Act.

Greyhound racing is a goddamn ugly sport. Even the lucky ones who survive it, like Dudley, are traumatized.

They come off the track into a world they've never experienced. They don't know how to walk up or down stairs, or how to fetch a ball. They have no idea what it means to be loved.

But they want to know. Even after all they've been through, they trust. They want to be with people. They are the sweetest, gentlest dogs, who, given half a chance, will lean against your legs and gaze up at you along their long snouts with a plaintive look. I'm ready to be loved now.

When Dudley came to us, he was ready to be loved. He was also so timid that he would urinate on himself in a submissive gesture every time I got near him. I spent long hours lying on the floor, next to his crate where he felt safe, synchronizing my breathing to his, quiet and still, to reassure him I would never hurt him. One day, he came out, and laid down beside me on the floor. I put my hand on his side, across a long scar the origins of which we do not know, and matched him breath for breath. There we laid, until he let me know he needed to go out, and I put on his leash without making him fearful for the first time.

That was the first step in what has been, and continues to be, a remarkable journey away from the track. When I think about the possibility that Dudley's fate, once he had proven useless as a racer, could have been a callous bit of violence to bring a swift end to his life, or a cruel bit of neglect to yield the same result over agonizing days, my heart aches. It aches because I cannot imagine my life without him, and it aches for all the greys who never had the same opportunity he's had to be loved.

It occurred to me the other day that sometime next week, give or take, Dudley will have officially lived more of his life with us than he lived before he got here.

It was a sort of relief, that thought. A relief on his behalf. As I thought about the literally scarring experiences he had at the track fading into the distance of time, diminishing into a terrible anomaly in a life of boundless affection, I asked Dudley if he knew that he is home. He flopped against me with all his weight, craned around his impossibly, comically long neck to give me a goofy grin, then licked my chin.

I will take that as a yes.

teaspoon icon Iowa is one of the few remaining states in which greyhound racing is legal. This week, a House panel in the Iowa state legislature approved a measure that would effectively end greyhound racing in the state. That would be excellent news in the long term, but would immediately leave thousands of dogs at risk of death unless area rescues can come to their aid. Please consider taking action or donating on behalf of greyhounds today. There are even more ways to help here. If you are considering adoption or would like to donate to a local rescue, a resource to find US greyhound rescues is here.

Please, if you can, help give other greys the same chance to be loved that Dudley's had.

Iain, me, and Dudley
Us & Dudz, last summer.

Open Wide...