With another presidential election comes a bunch of Republican candidates who say thinly-veiled racist things against Obama and then pretend that anyone who calls that shit out is a liberal hysteric.
Perry focused his fire on President Obama, who will be in a different part of the state later Monday.
"He says he's on a listening tour," Perry said, "so I'm going to talk to him."
"Mr. President, you need to free up the employers of this country to create jobs." Perry called on Obama to "free up this country" from "stifling regulation."
"I'm a pro-business governor, I don't make any apologies about it and I will be a pro-business president."
Perry warned that a "big black cloud" hangs over the country.
He didn't mean it that way blah blah fart.
Perry also sent this message to President Obama: "I think you want a president who is passionate about America—that's in love with America." So yet another Othering dog-whistle about how Obama isn't a "real American," which is truly galling when one recalls that Rick "I'm in Love with America" Perry was suggesting that maybe his state should secede from the union two years ago.
On a church sign on the way to the dog park (this was quite a few weeks ago now, but let's just pretend I didn't keep forgetting to post it and that I only saw it this weekend, to keep it topical):
When things get hard, Christians fall on their knees.
I know that's supposed to be synonymous with, "When life becomes difficult, Christians pray," but.
Was there really no one in the entire congregation who noticed the potential problem there...?
"He should go after the problem with everything he's got. He should travel the country and go where people are not employed and let the country know he cares about this in the pit of his stomach. … I don't think we've seen nearly enough. We've seen virtually nothing."—Peter Buttenwieser, a major Democratic fundraiser who is supporting President Obama's reelection bid, but wants him to pay more attention to job creation, quoted in a piece by Peter Nicholas for the LA Times, "Democrats urge Obama to be more aggressive on jobs."
[Trigger warning for misogyny; sexual objectification; dehumanization.]
Approximately five weeks after Elevatorgate, i.e. the latest round of "Where All the Atheist Ladies At?", I click through to Pharyngula at FTB to see that PZ Myers, who was rightly up in arms about the sexism directed at a woman on his team, has posted a piece about Rep. Michele Bachmann which includes a sexually suggestive picture of her from the Iowa State Fair about to eat a corndog and calls her a reptile.
That's the whole post. Rep. Michele Bachmann is a reptile, who may or may not be able to "disarticulate her mandibles at will" in order to get her mouth around a wiener. And the entire thing is set up from the main page so that the rank misogyny and dehumanization is a punchline:
You have to "Read More" to reveal the hilarity of why PZ thinks "there's good reason to be only cautiously speculative when it comes to the capacity of a reptile's jaws."
The sexual objectification of a woman in order to demean her is indefensibly misogynist, and it doesn't matter whether that women is likable, or kind, or herself willing to engage in sexism. If one is to be a feminist, or an ally to feminists, and if one is interested in human rights and social justice, then sexist and dehumanizing rhetoric and imagery is off the table.
And if one is authentically interested in making women feel welcome at your table, then one must stop forcing them to engage in the Terrible Bargain.
[My mistrust is] born of the multitude of mundane betrayals that mark my every relationship with a man—the casual rape joke, the use of a female slur, the careless demonization of the feminine in everyday conversation, the accusations of overreaction, the eyerolling and exasperated sighs in response to polite requests to please not use misogynist epithets in my presence or to please use non-gendered language ("humankind").
There are the insidious assumptions guiding our interactions—the supposition that I will regard being exceptionalized as a compliment ("you're not like those other women"), and the presumption that I am an ally against certain kinds of women. Surely, we're all in agreement that Britney Spears is a dirty slut who deserves nothing but a steady stream of misogynist vitriol whenever her name is mentioned, right? Always the subtle pressure to abandon my principles to trash this woman or that woman, as if I'll never twig to the reality that there's always a justification for unleashing the misogyny, for hating a woman in ways reserved only for women. I am exhorted to join in the cruel revelry, and when I refuse, suddenly the target is on my back. And so it goes.
...I am expected to nod in agreement, and I am nudged and admonished to agree. I am expected to say these things are not true of me, but are true of women (am I seceding from the union?); I am expected to put my stamp of token approval on the stereotypes. Yes, it's true. Between you and me, it's all true. That's what is wanted from me. Abdication of my principles and pride, in service to a patriarchal system that will only use my collusion to further subjugate me. This is a thing that is asked of me by men who purport to care for me.
...Not every man does all of these things, or even most of them, and certainly not all the time. But it only takes one, randomly and occasionally, exploding in a shower of cartoon stars like an unexpected punch in the nose, to send me staggering sideways, wondering what just happened.
PZ Myers is a smart guy, and he is capable of understanding that if he wants women to trust him and his space and the community of which he is a prominent part, then he can't continually expect them to overlook (and endorse) casual misogyny being wielded against other women.
As long as there are "allowable exceptions" against whom misogyny and dehumanization can be wielded, any women knows, from a lifetime of experience, that the target can easily end up on her own back, if one day her alliance to the in-group who defines the boundaries of acceptable misogyny is suddenly deemed insufficient.
That's not a fair thing to do to women. And as long as that insecurity is there, that knowledge that one day it could be me, many women will respond to that injustice by simply not associating with any group or person who perpetuates it.
The only way to make those women feel welcome is to have a zero tolerance policy on misogyny.
I expect more. And I challenge PZ Myers to expect more of himself.
After coming in third in the GOP king/queen-making Iowa Straw Poll over the weekend, former Minnesota governor Tim Pawlenty has dropped out of the presidential race.
"We needed to get some lift to continue on and have a pathway forward," Pawlenty said this morning in an exclusive interview on "This Week." "That didn't happen, so I'm announcing this morning on your show that I'm going to be ending my campaign for president."
"I'm very, very grateful for the people of Iowa," Pawlenty added. "I wish it would have been different, but obviously the pathway forward for me doesn't really exist, so we're going to end the campaign."
Pawlenty received only 14% of the vote behind winner Rep. Michele Bachmann (!) and Rep. Ron Paul, who received 28% and 27% of the vote, respectively.
Watching a report on the straw poll results yesterday, I said to Iain, "That Michele Bachmann won is terrifying," to which he replied, "Yep. She's so our next president."
Over the weekend, there was a terrible incident at the Indiana State Fair, which is one of the biggest state fairs in the country. During bad weather, a huge gust of wind blew over the rigging on the main stage just before the band Sugarland was set to perform, and the entire thing collapsed into the audience, killing five people and injuring dozens more.
Below is video of the incident, which may be upsetting, but shows how quickly it really happened:
There were terrible storms all through the state Saturday night: About two hours before this happened, Iain was out when a fierce storm kicked up so quickly that he had to pull over, because he couldn't see to drive from sheer force of the driving rain. Indiana State Fair officials were concerned about the weather, and warned the crowd of bad weather a few minutes before the collapse, but, naturally, told them they hoped the show would go on, too, which made a lot of people stay put in anticipation of the concert.
It's too soon to know exactly what happened, i.e. whether the collapse can really be attributed exclusively to the weather, to what Indiana State Police First Sgt. Dave Bursten called "a unique wind," which might have been a microburst. But certainly it's concerning, as architect Paul Harding pointed out to CBS News Chicago, that there did not appear to be any lateral supports in the structure.
The company responsible for the construction of the temporary structure, Mid-America Sound Corp., is being investigated by the Indiana Occupational Safety and Health Administration, but Indiana State Fair Executive Director Cindy Hoye is already publicly defending them, and Governor Mitch Daniels has already concluded that the entire thing was a "freakish accident." One hopes I-OSHA is more interested in ascertaining some actual facts before making conclusive pronouncements.
My profound condolences to the friends, family, and colleagues of the people who died: Alina Bigjohny, 23, of Fort Wayne; Christina Santiago, 29, of Chicago; Tammy Vandam, 42, of Wanatah; and two Indianapolis residents: 49-year-old Glenn Goodrich and 51-year-old Nathan Byrd.
You can read more here about Santiago, who worked for Chicago's Howard Brown Health Center, to which many local Shakers have close ties.
[Please note that Dudley and Zelda bare their teeth at each other in this video. They're just playing, but if seeing dogs bare their teeth is triggering or otherwise problematic for you, you should skip this video.]
Video Description: Dudley and Zelda play-fight, "biting" at each other's necks, ears, and general head area. I tell them to try not to eat each other's faces off. They look at me and go back to the Bitey Game.
The two of them will do this for ages, until they're both so tired that they're just lying on their sides with their heads bumped together, nudging each other's noses.
Earlier, they were playing between the door of my office and my desk, and Sophie came up and mewed at them while they were playing, as if to say, "Pardon me." They paused and looked at her, then she walked right between them toward me, and they waited until she'd passed before going right back to it, lol.
Priorities! The New York State Catholic Conference has them! And they are terrible!
According to reports filed with the Commission on Public Integrity, the Conference hired three lobbying firms in the first six months of 2011. Two firms worked exclusively opposing legislation that would give child sex crime victims more time to bring lawsuits or criminal charges. The third firm spent most of its time on such legislation.
Collectively, the Conference paid the three firms just over $111,000 in fees and expenses. The firms lobbied the governor, the State Senate, and the Assembly. The Church is concerned with limiting its financial liability in lawsuits resulting from allegations of sexual abuse of children by priests.
Emphasis mine.
The Church is, of course, concerned with protecting its own ass, but the laws they are lobbying against apply to all survivors of sex crimes. They'd sooner see every child who has been sexually abused and silenced until the statute of limitations runs out denied justice than be accountable to the children their employees abused. Unconscionable.
On Tuesday, I posted about an advertisement for Always pads that's been making its way around the Internet.
Liss recently received a statement from Leo Burnett UK, the agency responsible for the film:
All creative agencies will look at different creative ideas to push boundaries and engage consumers. We will occasionally make test films to try and bring an idea to life without a request from the client. These films are for internal use only, for us to understand the power of an idea and are not for publication. The creative was never commissioned nor approved by P&G. We regret this has been made public without our approval or authorization and apologise for any offence caused.
Essentially, someone at Leo Burnett UK, leaked a copy of the video. Oh, and if any passive-tense offence was caused, the agency apologizes.
I still have a few questions.
Where's Proctor and Gamble in all of this? Somebody leaked an unauthorized advertisement for one of their products. You'd think this would call for a statement. Is P&G waiting to see what happens with the video, before they take a stand, possibly absolving themselves of any involvement?
Why did Leo Burnett UK make this ad in the first place? Don't clients typically give ad agencies reasonably clear parameters for the design of marketing campaigns? I mean, I doubt Leo Burnett would have devoted the resources to put together this video if they thought there was zero chance P&G would actually use it, or more to the point, if they thought it would offend their paying client.
I'm willing to buy Leo Burnett UK's assertion that something unfortunate happened, but I have to say, I think they and I might be talking about different things.
[Trigger warning for sexual violence; body policing; misogyny.]
Rick Santorum, on his extreme abortion views, at the Republican Debate last night:
Moderator: Our next question is for Senator Santorum: In June, you said, quote, "I believe that any doctor who performs an abortion should be criminally charged for doing so." You would allow no exceptions for cases of rape and incest. [Santorum nods.] Polls have long shown that large majorities of Americans support at least some exceptions for abortion. Are your views too much even for many conservatives to support?
Santorum: You know, the Supreme Court of the Unites States, on a recent case, said that a man who committed rape could not be killed, would not be subject to the death penalty—yet the child [sic] conceived as a result of that rape could be. That to me sounds like a country that doesn't have its morals correct. That child [sic] did nothing wrong. That child [sic] is— [pauses for audience applause]. That child [sic] is an innocent victim. To be victimized twice would be a horrible thing.
It is an innocent human life. It is genetically human from the moment of conception—it is a human life—and we in America should be big enough to try to surround ourselves and help women in those terrible situations—they've been traumatized already! To put them through another trauma of an abortion I think is, uh, is too much to ask, and I so I would, I would just absolutely stand and say that ONE violence in enough!
Yes, Rick Santorum, to be victimized twice would be a horrible thing—and many women who get pregnant via rape consider being forced to carry to term a pregnancy caused by rape and bear their rapist's child a revictimization of their bodies. Which is why women have a choice. No pregnant rape survivor is required to get an abortion; and no pregnant rape survivor should be denied an abortion, either. And if you genuinely believed that to be victimized twice is a horrible thing, you would agree with me, you despicable, body-policing, misogynistic, hypocritical dipshit.
I have said before that I ardently believe, by virtue of what giving birth demands of the human body, the anti-choice position to be inherently violent. To take an anti-choice position in the case of a pregnancy resulting from rape is to turn the inherent violence up to 11.
Let me be blunt: Rick Santorum is suggesting that after a man violates my body without my consent, sticks his penis in my vagina without my consent, ejaculates into my body without my consent, impregnates me without my consent, that he, Rick Santorum, should then have the right to force me to submit my body for nine months to a pregnancy I do not want, force me to submit my body to all that pregnancy can entail, from morning sickness to milk-engorged breasts to stretch marks to potentially life-threatening complications, and then force me to push out a baby I did not consent to conceive through the same vagina that was raped nine months earlier, and then decide whether to parent my rapist's child or give up my child for adoption.
Which doesn't even take into consideration the financial cost of a pregnancy, nor the possible threat to my job, nor that I might have a husband, who would be obliged to raise my rapist's child with me, and about a million other things that are masked behind his casual grin as he suggests "let's rally behind women who are impregnated by rapists," as if a lack of support from misogynist shitbags is their primary reason for termination.
And he's worried about the double victimization of a fucking blastocyst.
Welcome to Shakesville, a progressive feminist blog about politics, culture, social justice, cute things, and all that is in between. Please note that the commenting policy and the Feminism 101 section, conveniently linked at the top of the page, are required reading before commenting.