President FML and His Brilliant Strategy to Alienate His Base: Now With Bonus Corporatocracy!

Because where else ya got to go, suckers?

President Obama opened [last] week by calling on Democrats to embrace his re-election campaign. He closed it by praising Republicans for forging a compromise to cut spending this year and avert a government shutdown.

The juxtaposition made clearer than ever the more centrist governing style Mr. Obama has adopted since his party's big losses in November and his recapture-the-middle strategy for winning a second term.

But in agreeing Friday night to what he called the largest annual spending cut in the nation's history, the president further decoupled himself from his party in Congress, exacerbating concerns among some Democrats about whether he is really one of them and is willing to spend political capital to defend their principles on bigger battles ahead.
Spoiler Alert: No, he's not. To do that would be partisan, which is just unseemly in Obama's fantasy world of bipartisan civility, where he's so high on unicorn farts that he still hasn't noticed that the opposition party doesn't share his interest in compromise.
The question of where Mr. Obama's bottom line is on Democratic priorities will be that much more urgent to his party as House Republicans, energized by their success in resetting the terms of the debate in Washington, press an aggressive conservative agenda in the coming months that includes deeper spending cuts and a fundamental reshaping of the Medicare and Medicaid programs.
Awesome. Speaking of which...here's a word from one of the assholes to whom Obama's pandering, at the expense of marginalizing his own base:
[O]n Fox News Sunday, host Chris Wallace questioned House Majority Leader Eric Cantor's (R-VA) support for a [healthcare] plan in which Americans "pay more out of pocket." Defending the proposal, Cantor argued that [Medicare and Medicaid] sometimes provide a "safety net" for "people who frankly don't need one."
Cantor: We are in a situation where we have a safety net in place in this country for people who frankly don't need one. We have to focus on making sure we have a safety net for those who need it. ... We believe if you put in place the mechanism that allow for personal choice as far as Medicare is concerned, as well as the programs in Medicaid, that we can actually get to a better resolve and do what most Americans are learning how to do, which is to do more with less.
As the Wonk Room's Igor Volsky points out, Ryan's block grant idea would actually "destroy Medicaid" because the annual federal appropriation would be less than projected growth.

...The Ryan plan does, however, provide a "safety net" for one specific demographic. Ryan's plan will reduce the top marginal income tax rate and the corporate income tax rate from 35 percent to 25 percent — a move that, as the Wonk Room's Pat Garofalo notes, shifts the tax burden down the income scale onto the middle class.
Meanwhile, in other news, "profits at American businesses were up an astounding 29.2 percent [in the fourth quarter last year], the fastest growth in more than 60 years." And not only that! "The median pay for top executives at 200 major companies was $9.6 million last year. That was a 12 percent increase over 2009." Yay for Corporate America! Can't wait for that stupendous wealth to TRICKLE DOWN!
So far, this recovery has not trickled down. After two relatively lean years, C.E.O.'s in finance, technology, energy and beyond are pulling down multimillion-dollar paychecks. What many of these executives aren't doing, however, is hiring. Unemployment, although down from its peak, stood at 8.8 percent in March. And few economists predict the jobless rate will drop substantially anytime soon.
Oh.

Well, how about some good news? "Not only is BP still in business, it has more cash today than before the spill. Earlier this year the company negotiated massive energy deals in India and Russia. And, despite opposition from some in Congress, it has even resumed exploration in the deep waters of the Gulf."

Huzzah!

UPDATE: In an address later this week, President Obama will appeal to Republicans to "join him in writing a broad plan to raise revenues and reduce the growth of popular entitlement programs... Mr. Obama will urge bipartisan negotiations toward a multiyear debt-reduction plan... [Obama] envisions a more comprehensive plan that would include tax increases for the richest taxpayers, cuts to military spending, savings in Medicare and Medicaid, and unspecified changes to Social Security." How bipartisan.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

Photobucket

Hosted by a flamingo.

Open Wide...

Sunday Shuffle

This is what came up for me:

The Avett Brothers, I and Love and You


You?

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

"This morning, District residents learned that the administration and Senate Democrats were willing to let the House Republicans treat them as second-class citizens. I am relieved that the bill did not include the national policy riders I abhorred. However, this entire city of 600,000 taxpaying Americans has every reason to be angry that the administration and Senate Democrats did not draw a similar line in the sand that stopped at the District, and the self-governing rights of its citizens."Eleanor Holmes Norton, who represents the District of Columbia in Washington's most populous at-large Congressional seat (which still does not have a vote in the House), on the Democrats' willingness to compromise the reproductive rights of the city's residents during budget negotiations.

Part of the deal was the passage of a measure which prevents the city of Washington, D.C. from paying for abortions with its tax revenues.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

Photobucket

Hosted by the Purple Heart.

This week's open threads have been brought to you by things that are purple.

Open Wide...

So the Deal Was Struck

And it's garbage:

Their negotiations have teetered erratically on the brink of collapse for weeks. But Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and House Speaker John Boehner have finally shaken hands on a spending bill to fund the government through September and avoid a government shutdown.

"We have agreed to an historic amount of cuts for the remainder of this fiscal year, as well as a short-term bridge that will give us time to avoid a shutdown while we get that agreement through both houses and to the President," read a joint statement from both leaders. "We will cut $78.5 billion below the President's 2011 budget proposal, and we have reached an agreement on the policy riders. In the meantime, we will pass a short-term resolution to keep the government running through Thursday. That short-term bridge will cut the first $2 billion of the total savings."

Despite the violent sturm und drang surrounding these negotiations -- including familiar, but tired accusations by Republicans of Democratic infidelity to U.S. troops -- the final deal looks uncannily like the framework the two sides have been working with since the middle of March.

It includes cuts to both mandatory and discretionary spending, and does not include a rider that would have defunded Planned Parenthood -- the final sticking point in the negotiations. A separate measure to prevent the city of Washington from paying for abortions with its tax revenues survived. Republicans have also been promised votes in the Senate on riders to defund Planned Parenthood and health care implementation.
Emphasis mine.

So. Not only is the US government pursuing an austerity strategy, which is a terrible idea in every conceivable way, and will fail to stimulate growth while simultaneously creating a greater strain on underfunded social programs, but this "success" has come at the expense of women's reproductive rights.

Gee, I'm beginning to detect a trend.

Meanwhile, as Echidne points out, the president's speech following the agreement framed women's reproductive rights as a "social issue," which is straight-up Republican framing.

We've sure come a long way (no we haven't) from Barack the Feminist (LULZ). I guess he's just one of those "pragmatic feminists" who understands that sometimes women's reproductive rights need to get thrown under the bus in order to make way for Important Democratic Politics, like empowering the most rightwing elements in the Republican Party.

To understand how thoroughly the Dems caved to the GOP on this deal, it was struck with "historic" cuts about which that nincompoop Reid is actually bragging, as if misogyny, Social Darwinism, and allowing infrastructure to fester until people die on collapsing bridges are radically brave progressive ideas.

Obama's a fucking disaster. We needed FDR; instead we got FML.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

Photobucket

Hosted by Prince.

Open Wide...

The Virtual Pub Is Open


[Explanations: lol your fat. pathetic anger bread. hey your gay.]

TFIF, Shakers!

Belly up to the bar,
and name your poison!

Open Wide...

In Case Anyone Was Wondering

What Planned Parenthood Actually Does:


Ezra Klein:
As you can see in the chart atop this post, abortion services account for about 3 percent of Planned Parenthood’s activities. That's less than cancer screening and prevention (16 percent), STD testing for both men and women (35 percent), and contraception (also 35 percent). About 80 percent of Planned Parenthood's users are over age 20, and 75 percent have incomes below 150 percent of the poverty line. Planned Parenthood itself estimates it prevents more than 620,000 unintended pregnancies each year, and 220,000 abortions. It's also worth noting that federal law already forbids Planned Parenthood from using the funds it receives from the government for abortions.
Of course, I don't expect FACTS to matter to people who spend their lives willfully avoiding any information that might dissuade them from their sanctimonious certainty about their heaven-stamped rectitude.

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute



Two tetras in my tank at home.

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

"The G.O.P. budget plan isn't a good-faith effort to put America's fiscal house in order; it's voodoo economics, with an extra dose of fantasy, and a large helping of mean-spiritedness."Paul Krugman.

Open Wide...

Photography with Deeky!



Taken on my Android with an app called FxCamera.
Kind of makes my building look like the set of Serpico.

Open Wide...

Friday Blogaround

This blogaround brought to you by Shaxco, proud publishers of Accordions and Stinky Cheese: The Musings of a Musical Foodie by Paul T. Spud.

Recommended Reading:

Monica: Archaeologists Find 5000 Year Old Trans Skeleton

Cara: [TW for sexual violence; background here] An Open Letter to the De Anza Rape Victim

Echidne: [TW for violence] The Brazil School Killing (Also see: scatx.)

Latoya: Houria Bouteldja on "White Women and the Privilege of Solidarity"

Fannie: You Could Be Dying... Or Not... But Maybe

Andy: Top Chefs for Marriage Equality

Leave your links in comments...

Open Wide...

Number of the Day

[Trigger warning for violence.]

32.7%: The percentage of women's reproductive-health clinics located near anti-choice "crisis pregnancy centers" which have "experienced one or more incidents of severe violence, compared to only 11.3 percent of clinics not near a CPC. (Severe violence includes clinic blockades and invasions, bombings, arson, bombing and arson threats, death threats, chemical attacks, stalking, physical violence and gunfire.)"

I say again that the anti-choice movement, which includes a decades-long campaign of intimidation, harassment, and violence directed at abortion providers and abortion seekers, is the most brazen, unapologetic, inherently violent terrorist campaign in America, its co-ordination and orchestration done right out in the open, where no one in the media or politics will call it what it is.

Additionally:

CPCs, of which there are an estimated 2,300 to 4,000 nationwide, use a variety of tactics to deceive women who are considering abortions, as Joyce pointed out, including: "[providing] misinformation about their pregnancy status or due date or suggesting unproven links between abortion and cancer, infertility or suicide. A 2006 congressional report requested by Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) found that 87 percent of CPCs that receive federal funding provide false information."
But let's defund Planned Parenthood.

[H/T to @TrustWomen.]

Open Wide...

Prejudice Doesn't Exist in a Void

Shaker Imagynne emails, which I am publishing with her permission:

I'm a researcher who works in the area of population health and racism. I recently came across a paper outlining the ways in which peer attitudes influence individuals' expressed prejudices and acceptance of stereotyping. From the introduction:
Individuals often conform to the intergroup attitudes and behaviors modeled by their peers in a given situation. They express more tolerance of racist speech following a peer's expression of racist views, and less tolerance after a peer condemns racism (Blanchard, Crandall, Brigham, & Vaughn, 1994); they adjust to the current peer consensus on stereotyping when reporting their own racial stereotypes (Sechrist & Stangor, 2001; Stangor, Sechrist, & Jost, 2001); they are more tolerant of discrimination against minorities and women after overhearing racist or sexist jokes (Ford & Ferguson, 2004; LaFrance & Woodzicka, 1998) and when they perceive prejudice against those groups to be socially acceptable (Crandall, Eshleman, & O'Brien, 2002). A signal as subtle as a peer's antiracism t-shirt can go so far as to influence an individual's unconscious, uncensored prejudice (Lun, Sinclair, Glenn, & Whitchurch, 2007; Sinclair, Lowery, Hardin, & Colangelo, 2005).
I thought I would forward it to you since it fits in so neatly with the idea that rape jokes facilitate acceptance of rape and so on.
This is what I'm talking about when I say, over and over like the broken record that I am, whether it's about marginalizing humor, rape jokes, images and objects of disembodied women, "odd news," advertising, movies and other pop culture, et cetera, that it is the pervasive, ubiquitous, inescapable little stuff that creates the foundation of cultural prejudices on which the big stuff is dependent for its survival.

Which is why the recommendation to "get over it," so often intertwined with accusations of looking for things about which to get offended, is not merely ill-advised and totally fucking obnoxious, but counter to the ultimate goal of social justice. We can't ignore "the little stuff," because that's Itthat's the stuff, that's the fertile soil in which everything else takes root and from whence everything else springs, that's the way that the fundamental idea of inequality is conveyed over and over and over again.

Asking me to "let it go" is thus asking me to participate in my own marginalization and/or the marginalization of others, and I can't do that. I won't. I'm all in.

Open Wide...

Fiend for Democracy

Good news! Banana Republic has announced its Spring lineup. The vintage straight is in. Democracy is still out.

In case you haven't been following Wisconsin's version of U.S. politics, things in Madison have been interesting of late.

The short version is that the Republicans used, um, questionable tactics, to pass a bill stripping public employees of most collective bargaining rights. I know everyone's different in this regard, but for me the highlight was when the Wisconsin GOP held an "emergency" [video*] conference committee meeting on a new version of the anti-union bill, didn't post adequate notice, and didn't allow Democrats time to read the bill they were voting on.

Given the uncertainty about the legality of both the bill's contents and the process by which it was passed, there's broad agreement that the Wisconsin Supreme Court will likely hear one or more cases to determine if the executive branch can implement the legislation. That brings us to this week.

There are seven justices on the Wisconsin Supreme Court, four conservatives and three liberals. As it happens, incumbent Judge David Prosser Jr. (a conservative) was up for re-election this Tuesday. Conventional wisdom has been that this election would determine the fate of the Wisconsin GOP's anti-union law. Campaign donors reacted accordingly.

Yesterday morning, it appeared that liberal challenger JoAnne Kloppenberg had won (pending an automatic recount) by a margin of 204 votes out of nearly 1.5 million ballots cast. And that's when things got really interesting.

Last night, the clerk of Waukesha County (a Prosser stronghold) announced that she had found 14,315 votes. With these new ballots, Prosser took a 7500 vote lead. Interestingly enough, this lead is just wide enough for Prosser to claim victory without triggering an automatic recount. If the margin holds, Kloppenberg and her allies may have to pay the full cost of any recount they request.

It gets better. By which I mean more interesting.

All of the missing ballots were from Brookfield. The day before County Clerk Kathy Nickolaus found the 14,315 "missing" votes, at least one outlet was already reporting the vote tally for Brookfield, with a total of 14,315 votes cast. I doubt that there was 106% turnout in Brookfield (split exactly evenly between wards, no less). I've been to Brookfield. They don't like democracy that much. What is going on here?

Then there's the biography of Kathy Nickolaus:

Nickolaus was given immunity from prosecution in a 2002 criminal investigation into illegal activity by members of the assembly Republican Caucus. She worked for 13 years as a data analyst and computer specialist for the caucus.

She resigned from her state job in 2002 just before launching her county clerk campaign.

The corruption probe took down then-Assembly Speaker Scott Jensen, a Republican; Senate Majority Leader Chuck Chvala, D-Madison; Sen. Brian Burke, D-Milwaukee, co-chairman of the powerful Joint Finance Committee; Assembly Majority Leader Steve Foti, R-Oconomowoc; and Rep. Bonnie Ladwig, R-Racine. They all reached plea deals.

I remember that. Good times. Use of state resources for political purposes is a big deal-- just ask the Republicans.

By the way, Kathy Nickolaus' boss at the assembly Republican Caucus was then-Assembly speaker David Prosser. FYI.

In any case, if there's one thing I'd like to think that everyone can agree on, it's that Kathy Nickolaus is a horrible, horrible county clerk. Last year, Waukesha County audited her office. Among its concerns was Nickolaus' practice of storing election results on her personal computers. The auditors also complained about Nickolaus' secrecy.

Maybe this was an honest mistake on Nickolaus' part. However, given the circumstances surrounding an election to determine the fate of the body charged with deciding the legality of Wisconsin's laws, it would be seem prudent to do a full investigation to make sure the election was legal.


UPDATE
A hopeful development:
(Reuters) - The agency overseeing Wisconsin elections will not certify results of Tuesday's state Supreme Court race until it concludes a probe into how a county clerk misplaced and then found some 14,000 votes that upended the contest.

--
*Help! Can anyone find/make a transcript?

Transcript via Shaker trinity91 (thanks!):

[A screen from Wisconsin Eye reading: Joint Committee of Conference. January 2011 Special Session Assembly Bill 11. March 09, 2011. Executive Session, Wisconsin State Capitol, Madison, WI.]

[Paper rustling, various unidentified people: “Yeah, you're over here.” “What's this say?” “Bob, you're down here.” Incoherent muttering]

Senator Scott Fitzgerald: Okay, we'll call the conference committee... uh, to order and I'll ask, uh, Director Lang, the committee clerk to call the roll.

[The clerk calls roll]

Senator Scott Fitzgerald: [Reading] Okay we have a quorum. In order to move this process along, the Speaker and I have asked Director Lang to prepare a proposal for the committee's consideration. The proposal is in front of you. Uh, If the committee approves it, the proposal will be drafted as a substitute amendment to Special Session Assembly Bill 11.

Representative Peter Barca: Mr. Chairman?

Sen. Fitzgerald: We have cons...

Rep. Barca: Mr. Chairman?

Sen. Fitzgerald: [Reading] I have consulted... let me read this statement. I have consulted with the Legislative Council, the Legislative Reference Bureau, and the Legislative Fiscal Bureau. and have been advised that this proposal would not trigger the special quorum requirement in Article 8, Section 8 of the Wisconsin Constitution. At this time I would move to adopt.

Rep. Barca: [Talking over Sen. Fitzgerald] Excuse me, Mr. Chairman?

Sen. Fitzgerald: ...As the conference... [inaudible]... Is there a second?

Rep. Barca: Wait! Excuse me, Mr. Chairman, Conference Chairman, excuse me.

Voice: I'll second that.

Rep. Barca: I have a question about the open meetings rules being violated.

[Rep. Barca continues talking over the reading of the bill, there is yelling in the background: Take a moment! Step back from the abyss! Think about what you're doing here! ]

Rep. Barca: [Hand raised] I have a statement saying you need 24 hour notice, from current Attorney General.

Sen. Fitzgerald: Wait, wait, wait, let me, discussion, let me recognize you, discussion, go ahead.

Rep. Barca: Okay. Thank you very much, Chairman. First of all, Mr. Chairman, most importantly before we even get started, obviously, I'm going to want a summary of this bill from our Director Lang, uh, so that I understand what's in here.

Sen. Fitzgerald: It's.. It's the same bill that you debated, for 60 hours.

Rep. Barca: Oh there's nothing different?

Sen. Fitzgerald: Nah, they just removed items from it.

Rep Barca: [Indicates that he didn't quite hear Sen. Fitzgerald] They removed what?

Sen. Fitzgerald: They removed items from it. There's nothing new.

Rep. Barca: So we can't get a description of what was removed?

Sen. Fitzgerald: There's nothing new.

Rep. Barca: Well, you said things were removed, Mr. Chairman. I want to know what's removed. It seems to me that the body should have, that our Committee should know what we are voting on. I don't know what was removed, so I need to know that. I do want a description from Director Lang. Secondly, I have a couple of motions that I would like to make as amendments to this...

Sen. Fitzgerald: [Interjects] No motions.

Rep. Barca: Clearly, uh, conference committees...

Sen. Fitzgerald: [Interjects] No motions.

Rep. Barca: ...do have an opportunity to for people to amend a bill.

Sen. Fitzgerald: No. There's no motions.

Rep. Barca: So, I want to be able to present those, but before we even get into that, I want to say that this is a violation of the open meetings law. Ah, it is required,... I've got a memo here from our current Attorney General, not a past one, the current one, August of 2010. [Chants of “shame!” are audible in the background] No Wisconsin court decision will not allow meetings unless you have good cause to provide less than 24 hours notice of a meeting. The provision, like all other provisions of the open meetings laws must be construed in favor of providing the public...

Sen. Fitzgerald: [Interjects] Representative Barca?

Rep. Barca: ...with the fullness of...

Sen. Fitzgerald: [Interjects] Representative Barca?

Rep. Barca: ...of information about all government affairs...

Sen. Fitzgerald: [Interjects] Representative Barca?

Rep. Barca: ...that's compatible with the good conduct of government business. If there's any doubt...

[Representative Barca continues to read the memo while Senator Fitzgerald continues to interrupt]
Sen. Fitzgerald: Representative Barca?

Rep. Barca: [Stops reading] Yeah?

Offscreen: Get the gavel.

Sen. Fitzgerald: Clerk, call roll

Representative Barca: No! Excuse me! No! [Stands up, holding the memo] Listen! It says if there's any doubt whether good cause exists, the governmental body should provide 24 hour notice! This is clearly a violation of open meetings law! Know if you've been shutting people down, it is improper for you to move forward while this is a violation of open meetings law!

[Roll proceeds]

Unidentified Committee member: Aye.

Rep. Barca: You're not allowing amendments and that is wrong.

Unidentified Committee member: Aye.

Rep. Barca: Now, I... I... Mr. Chairman? This is a violation of law! This is not just a rule, it is the law.

[Senator Fitzgerald gavels the meeting to a close.]

Clerk: Meeting is adjourned.

[Protestors chanting “SHAME” in the Capitol rotunda are clearly audible.]

Rep. Barca: No, Mr Chairman! This is a violation of the open meetings law! It requires 24, at least 2 hours notice!

[Within the room, observers say “Shame!” “What have you done?” The clerk opens the door, there are still protesters shouting outside. Rep. Barca has his hand and is saying “Excuse me?” in an attempt to be recognized from the rest of the committee, which is leaving the room. The screen cuts away to an image from Wisconsin Eye and some light music.]

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime



John Kilzer: "Red Blue Jeans"

Open Wide...

The Latest on Budgetfuck 2011

New York TimesIt May Be a 'Budget Battle,' but Some Skirmishes Have Little to Do With Money:

There are fights about money and fights about ideas, and the battle over a spending plan to keep the government open is increasingly centered on the latter.

The frenetic negotiations to avert a government shutdown seem largely focused not on dollars and cents, where the two sides are not all that far apart, but on policy issues, primarily abortion and environmental regulations, that defy easy compromise.

"We've been close on the cuts for days," Harry Reid, the Democratic Senate majority leader, said Thursday, adding, "The only things — I repeat, the only things — holding up an agreement are two of their so-called social issues: women's health and clean air."
WaPo$5 billion separates parties in elusive 2011 budget deal: "Republicans and Democrats on Capitol Hill say they are about $5 billion apart in their haggling to reach a deal to fund the federal government for the rest of the year. That amounts to one-half of 1 percent of the trillion dollars in spending Congress doles out each year. Five one-thousandths."

The HillBrinkmanship and traded barbs in the shadow of a shutdown: "Congressional leaders reported progress in around-the-clock negotiations, but each side accused the other of backing away from a final deal. Without congressional action on Friday, the government would shutter at midnight for the first time in 15 years."

New York TimesNo Accord in Budget Talks as Policy Fights Hamper Deal: "Mr. Boehner in particular faced a tricky calculation about how much he could compromise without losing support not just from his large contingent of Tea Party-inspired fiscal conservatives, but also from social conservatives who were eager for a victory on abortion and other issues."

Jodi Jacobson—Averting a Government Shutdown? GOP Says Over Your Dead Body. And They Mean It:
All (let me repeat this: ALL) of Planned Parenthood’s federal funding goes toward basic health care. Public funds account for roughly a third of Planned Parenthood’s $1 billion annual budget. These funds come from local, state and federal sources, but 90 percent come from Medicaid and other federal sources. Federal funds pay only for cancer screenings, birth control, family planning visits, annual exams, testing for HIV and other STIs, and other basic care.

Moreover, Planned Parenthood centers provide access to those who otherwise have NO other options. Seventy-three percent of Planned Parenthood health centers are in rural or medically underserved areas.

Planned Parenthood provides primary and preventive health care to many who otherwise would have nowhere to turn. According to the Guttmacher Institute, six in ten patients who receive care at a family planning health center like Planned Parenthood consider it their main source of health care.
See also: TPMDC's "Abortion, Spending Cuts Hamper Deal To Avoid Government Shutdown" and Mother Jones' "The GOP's (Latest) Budget Blame Game."

Open Wide...

Ugh, American Idol. Ugh.

[Spoiler Warning: This post includes discussion of who was voted off American Idol last night. Trigger warning for racism, sexism.]

American Idol has a racism problem. American Idol also has a sexism problem. That's true generally—four of its nine winners have been female; three of its nine winners have been people of color (two women, one man). But it's especially true this season.

The season started out with 13 finalists: Six men, seven women. So far this season, only one man has been voted off—and the judges used their one and only "save" to rescue him from elimination. At this point in the season, we are down to eight contestants—six men, and two women.

[Spoiler warning for image below the fold and related discussion that reveals who was eliminated last night.]


From left to right: African-American contestant Ashthon Jones, Puerto Rican-American contestant Karen Rodriguez, African-American contestant Naima Adedapo, Filipina-American contestant Thia Megia, and Italian-American contestant Pia Toscano.

Above are the contestants who have been eliminated so far this season. All—all—of the women of color were voted off first. (With the exception of the white male contestant who was voted off and saved; the next week, two women of color were sent home.) When only three white women were left, the most "ethnic"-looking of the three women, who was widely regarded as one of the best singers in the competition, was eliminated.

A woman of color hasn't won since Season 6 (Jordin Sparks); seasons 7, 8, and 9 were all won by white men (David Cook, Kris Allen, and Lee DeWyze, respectively). All but one (Jacob Lusk, who was in the bottom three last night) of the remaining male contestants this season are white (or present as white*), so odds are that a white man will win American Idol again this year.

There is an argument to be made that this isn't American Idol's fault, but America's. The show has a geographical bias that favors southern contestants—six of the nine winners have been from southern states, and the three exceptions were Jordin Sparks who was from the southwest (Arizona), David Cook who was from the upland south (Missouri), and Lee DeWyze who was from Illinois but living in Oklahoma when he auditioned for the show. Four of the five female contestants voted off have been from New York, California, or Wisconsin. Only Ashthon Jones was from Georgia.

And then there's the argument that the US is itself a deeply sexist and racist place, so it ought to be no surprise when the voting reflects those values. Of the top 10 best-selling music artists in the US, only Barbra Streisand is not a white male.

Except.

If you start looking at best-selling lists of recent decades, things start looking different. Best-sellers are not a sea of white male faces, anymore.

(And there's a separate issue about, for example, Motown music being covered over and over, instead of originals considered untouchable canon, which affects all-time best-sellers lists, and which is a whole other post I will write someday, but suffice it to say all-time US best-sellers lists are deceptively white, anyway.)

Yes, American Idol votes skew based on the same prejudices that affect all parts of US culture and the same clan-championing that goes on in US politics. But the show treats female and male contestants fundamentally differently, encouraging creativity among the boys and conformity among the girls. (Gee, where have I heard that before?)

And, beyond the creative-compliant disparity, there is the routinely reinforced narrative that (straight) male voters should support male contestants because they're cool, and (straight) female voters should support male contestants because they're hot. There were no staged scenes of teenybopper boys running onstage to throw themselves at Pia's feet (like Scotty McCreery got, with teenybopper girls)—or staged scenes of young girls running up to ask for her autograph. The only reason to vote for a female contestant, it seems, it because she's a good singer. "This is ultimately a singing competition," the judges like to say, so that ought to be enough.

But it's not enough, because calling American Idol just a singing competition is dishonest. And all the little staged extras, and the opportunities to show "personality," and all the other "showbiz spectacle" detritus that increases exponentially every year, favors the boys.

Which would just be exasperating, and nothing more than a reason to change the channel, were it not for the millions of little girls vested in the show—and internalizing the lessons it's teaching about how "America" treats men and women, especially women of color.

[Note: All of the female finalists this year were also thin.]

-------------------------------------

* Earlier in the season, the country contestant, Scotty McCreery, told Lopez his grandmother wanted him to tell her that he is one-quarter Puerto Rican. McCreery, however, trades on a cowpoke image inextricably associated, if wrongly so, with whiteness, and his family history did not come up again until this week, when he awkwardly attributed his dance moves this week to "the Puerto Rican blood."

Open Wide...

Open Thread

Photobucket

Hosted by grape soda.

Open Wide...