The Latest on Budgetfuck 2011

New York TimesIt May Be a 'Budget Battle,' but Some Skirmishes Have Little to Do With Money:

There are fights about money and fights about ideas, and the battle over a spending plan to keep the government open is increasingly centered on the latter.

The frenetic negotiations to avert a government shutdown seem largely focused not on dollars and cents, where the two sides are not all that far apart, but on policy issues, primarily abortion and environmental regulations, that defy easy compromise.

"We've been close on the cuts for days," Harry Reid, the Democratic Senate majority leader, said Thursday, adding, "The only things — I repeat, the only things — holding up an agreement are two of their so-called social issues: women's health and clean air."
WaPo$5 billion separates parties in elusive 2011 budget deal: "Republicans and Democrats on Capitol Hill say they are about $5 billion apart in their haggling to reach a deal to fund the federal government for the rest of the year. That amounts to one-half of 1 percent of the trillion dollars in spending Congress doles out each year. Five one-thousandths."

The HillBrinkmanship and traded barbs in the shadow of a shutdown: "Congressional leaders reported progress in around-the-clock negotiations, but each side accused the other of backing away from a final deal. Without congressional action on Friday, the government would shutter at midnight for the first time in 15 years."

New York TimesNo Accord in Budget Talks as Policy Fights Hamper Deal: "Mr. Boehner in particular faced a tricky calculation about how much he could compromise without losing support not just from his large contingent of Tea Party-inspired fiscal conservatives, but also from social conservatives who were eager for a victory on abortion and other issues."

Jodi Jacobson—Averting a Government Shutdown? GOP Says Over Your Dead Body. And They Mean It:
All (let me repeat this: ALL) of Planned Parenthood’s federal funding goes toward basic health care. Public funds account for roughly a third of Planned Parenthood’s $1 billion annual budget. These funds come from local, state and federal sources, but 90 percent come from Medicaid and other federal sources. Federal funds pay only for cancer screenings, birth control, family planning visits, annual exams, testing for HIV and other STIs, and other basic care.

Moreover, Planned Parenthood centers provide access to those who otherwise have NO other options. Seventy-three percent of Planned Parenthood health centers are in rural or medically underserved areas.

Planned Parenthood provides primary and preventive health care to many who otherwise would have nowhere to turn. According to the Guttmacher Institute, six in ten patients who receive care at a family planning health center like Planned Parenthood consider it their main source of health care.
See also: TPMDC's "Abortion, Spending Cuts Hamper Deal To Avoid Government Shutdown" and Mother Jones' "The GOP's (Latest) Budget Blame Game."

Open Wide...

Ugh, American Idol. Ugh.

[Spoiler Warning: This post includes discussion of who was voted off American Idol last night. Trigger warning for racism, sexism.]

American Idol has a racism problem. American Idol also has a sexism problem. That's true generally—four of its nine winners have been female; three of its nine winners have been people of color (two women, one man). But it's especially true this season.

The season started out with 13 finalists: Six men, seven women. So far this season, only one man has been voted off—and the judges used their one and only "save" to rescue him from elimination. At this point in the season, we are down to eight contestants—six men, and two women.

[Spoiler warning for image below the fold and related discussion that reveals who was eliminated last night.]


From left to right: African-American contestant Ashthon Jones, Puerto Rican-American contestant Karen Rodriguez, African-American contestant Naima Adedapo, Filipina-American contestant Thia Megia, and Italian-American contestant Pia Toscano.

Above are the contestants who have been eliminated so far this season. All—all—of the women of color were voted off first. (With the exception of the white male contestant who was voted off and saved; the next week, two women of color were sent home.) When only three white women were left, the most "ethnic"-looking of the three women, who was widely regarded as one of the best singers in the competition, was eliminated.

A woman of color hasn't won since Season 6 (Jordin Sparks); seasons 7, 8, and 9 were all won by white men (David Cook, Kris Allen, and Lee DeWyze, respectively). All but one (Jacob Lusk, who was in the bottom three last night) of the remaining male contestants this season are white (or present as white*), so odds are that a white man will win American Idol again this year.

There is an argument to be made that this isn't American Idol's fault, but America's. The show has a geographical bias that favors southern contestants—six of the nine winners have been from southern states, and the three exceptions were Jordin Sparks who was from the southwest (Arizona), David Cook who was from the upland south (Missouri), and Lee DeWyze who was from Illinois but living in Oklahoma when he auditioned for the show. Four of the five female contestants voted off have been from New York, California, or Wisconsin. Only Ashthon Jones was from Georgia.

And then there's the argument that the US is itself a deeply sexist and racist place, so it ought to be no surprise when the voting reflects those values. Of the top 10 best-selling music artists in the US, only Barbra Streisand is not a white male.

Except.

If you start looking at best-selling lists of recent decades, things start looking different. Best-sellers are not a sea of white male faces, anymore.

(And there's a separate issue about, for example, Motown music being covered over and over, instead of originals considered untouchable canon, which affects all-time best-sellers lists, and which is a whole other post I will write someday, but suffice it to say all-time US best-sellers lists are deceptively white, anyway.)

Yes, American Idol votes skew based on the same prejudices that affect all parts of US culture and the same clan-championing that goes on in US politics. But the show treats female and male contestants fundamentally differently, encouraging creativity among the boys and conformity among the girls. (Gee, where have I heard that before?)

And, beyond the creative-compliant disparity, there is the routinely reinforced narrative that (straight) male voters should support male contestants because they're cool, and (straight) female voters should support male contestants because they're hot. There were no staged scenes of teenybopper boys running onstage to throw themselves at Pia's feet (like Scotty McCreery got, with teenybopper girls)—or staged scenes of young girls running up to ask for her autograph. The only reason to vote for a female contestant, it seems, it because she's a good singer. "This is ultimately a singing competition," the judges like to say, so that ought to be enough.

But it's not enough, because calling American Idol just a singing competition is dishonest. And all the little staged extras, and the opportunities to show "personality," and all the other "showbiz spectacle" detritus that increases exponentially every year, favors the boys.

Which would just be exasperating, and nothing more than a reason to change the channel, were it not for the millions of little girls vested in the show—and internalizing the lessons it's teaching about how "America" treats men and women, especially women of color.

[Note: All of the female finalists this year were also thin.]

-------------------------------------

* Earlier in the season, the country contestant, Scotty McCreery, told Lopez his grandmother wanted him to tell her that he is one-quarter Puerto Rican. McCreery, however, trades on a cowpoke image inextricably associated, if wrongly so, with whiteness, and his family history did not come up again until this week, when he awkwardly attributed his dance moves this week to "the Puerto Rican blood."

Open Wide...

Open Thread

Photobucket

Hosted by grape soda.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

What is your least favorite chain restaurant?

I prefer to go to an independent restaurant when possible, but some Midwestern suburbs are nothing but chains—impossible to eat a reasonably priced meal while you're out and about unless it's at a chain. I always find the mid-rangers (e.g. TGI Friday's) to be the awfulest proposition, with food only marginally better than fast food but costing 5x as much. At least with McDonald's, I know what I'm getting (shit), and it's priced accordingly.

As for the worst: The last time I ate at Applebee's, it was a total garbage disaster.

Open Wide...

Fun with Site Meter

The top search engine terms currently bringing people to Shakesville:



How'd you get in there, Nia Vardalos?!

[Previously in Fun with Site Meter: One, Two, Three, Four, Five, Six.]

Open Wide...

Sing It, Sister

Rep. Nancy Pelosi tells it like it is:

House Minority Leader Rep. Nancy Pelosi told a summit of female activists she believes Republicans are engaged in a war on women and women's rights.

"There is actually a war on women," the minority leader told several hundred activists attending the Women Money Power Summit sponsored by the Feminist Majority Foundation. "Abortion is one issue but contraception and family planning and birth control are opposed by this crowd too. Understand what is at risk here," Pelosi said, referring to proposals promoted by the new House Republican leadership.

Pelosi's criticism echoes warnings by other progressive activists who argue the new House Republican leadership's budget cuts disproportionally target programs for women's health and low-incomes women's services.

Pelosi identified three bills pending before Congress which she said take aim at women. One, HR-3, would restrict women's access to abortion and eliminate federal funds for abortion in all circumstances. A second, the stop gap spending measure passed Thursday by the House, would eliminate funding for Planned Parenthood, including for health checks for sexually transmitted diseases. And the third, the House Republicans' proposed budget for next year, would completely overhaul Medicare and Medicaid. Pelosi argued that proposal will end Medicare altogether.

"This is not reform. This is the same old ideological turn back the clock for women- end Medicare, end Medicare. Are you ready for that?" Pelosi asked the crowd.

...In an interview with CNN Thursday, Pelosi maintained that women will bear the brunt of Ryan's Medicare fix saying, "Women are predominantly the recipients of Medicare, and they are going to be hurt by this. Medicaid—they are going to be hurt by this."
When asked for a response, because Maude knows we've got to have BOTH SIDES OF EVERY STORY, Republican National Committee spokeswoman Kirsten Kukowski dismissed Pelosi's comments as "scare tactics and demagoguery from Democrats who are trying to distract from the serious conversation Republicans are having about our unsustainable budget."

LOL FOREVER.

P.S. FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK YOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.

Open Wide...

Q&A

Question: Is former Senator, current Senate candidate, amateur tobacco-spitter, and professional racist George "Macaca" Allen the jackassiest jackass in all of jackassdom?

Answer: Yes.

The thing about his asking Lee if he understands "at-bats" is ridiculous in the extreme, and also echoes the macaca incident. He literally cannot look at someone of Asian descent and imagine that zie is American.

And with regard to his stupid excuse about how he just asks people if they've had a sports career to make conversation...bullshit. Yeah, put my fat female white ass in a room with Allen and let's see if he strikes up conversation by asking me what position I played.

Jackass!

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute


Lord Dudlington of Sleepyshire


"I am so exhausted from an entire day of xxxtreme laziness."


Grody Beef Tongue

Open Wide...

Number of the Day

Two: Donald Trump came in at the number two spot in both "a quick hit poll of [384] New Hampshire Republican primary voters" and "the respected Wall Street Journal/NBC poll," where he tied for second with Mike Huckabee. (Mitt Romney took first in both polls.)

I cannot even tell you how much I am moving to Britain if Donald Trump is elected president. I don't care how hilarious the 150-story Trump White House and Casino is. I'm outta here.

Open Wide...

STFU

[Trigger warning for rape, rape apologia, and Christian supremacy.]

There is not enough shutthefuckup in the world for this mess: Arguing against an abortion exception for rape, Republican state legislator Brent Crane, author of an anti-choice bill in Idaho which would criminalize abortion after 20 weeks with no exceptions for rape/incest, severe fetal abnormality, or psychological health of the pregnant woman, whipped out the old "God's plan" chestnut:

The Idaho bill's House sponsor, state Rep. Brent Crane, R-Nampa, told legislators that the "hand of the Almighty" was at work. "His ways are higher than our ways," Crane said. "He has the ability to take difficult, tragic, horrific circumstances and then turn them into wonderful examples."
I'll just go ahead and reiterate what I said when former Nevada GOP Senate candidate Sharron Angle was talking the same shit: If an anthropomorphic god with a "plan" for every human being existed, and Crane's version of that god were accurate, and that god actively used rape as a way to execute parts of its "plan," then I would seek commune with that god strictly for the purpose of rejecting it outright, strongly preferring on principle an eternal consignment to hellfire than even inadvertently conveying an infinitesimal moment of confusion as to my position.

[H/T to Spudsy.]

Open Wide...

Compassionate Conservatives Eliminate Domestic Violence Funding

by Shaker Moderator Aphra_Behn

[Trigger warning for domestic violence]

You remember Georgia's Nathan Deal, he of the homophobic campaign ads and stinktastic record on women's issues. Well, he won the Governor's seat, and so did a whole bunch of GOPeople, so many that the Republicans control both Houses of the GA Legislative Assembly. Now they have to make tough decisions about the budget (when they're not busy totally failing at job creation, that is!) and they've gone about it with exactly the "pro-family" priorities we've come to expect from the Georgia GOP:

Georgia is set to eliminate all state money for domestic violence programs, replacing it with federal funds that some advocates say will limit the services shelters for battered women can provide.
Yes, you read that right. In order to solve the state's budget woes, the House and the Senate both voted to eliminate all state money for DV programs.

And if you think that Deal and his fellow Republicans just don't care about domestic violence, well, hold on there, partner! They are just going to use federal money instead: TANF (Temporary Assistance to Needy Families) will make up the difference.

Except, not so much.
In memos and e-mails from February and March, HHS officials asked the state to explain its use of TANF dollars but said they would not know for sure whether they were permissible until they conducted an audit.
To sum:

1. Led by GOP Governor Nathan Deal, both the Georgia GOP-led House and the GOP-led Senate have voted in a budget that eliminates funding for DV shelters. They say federal money will make up the difference.

2. The Feds say that's a questionable use of funds.

3. The Georgia GOP keeps it in the budget anyway. Because they don't actually give a shit.

You can dress this up any way you like—I especially love the Georgia Budget and Policy Institute guy who calls this "creative"—but it signals a fundamental disdain for the rights of women. As Liss says, this shit doesn't happen in a void. If you think that it's a coincidence that this same legislature has seen bills introduced that classify abortions as "prenatal murder" and rape survivors as "accusers"...well, then you have a very broad definition of "coincidence."

Anyway, we shouldn't worry, because Nathan Deal (of the barftastic track record on DV) assures us that the money will be there somehow!
"We do feel this is a permissible use of TANF funds," Robinson said. "But no matter what happens the money will be there for these shelters."
Well, I feel better, don't you? I guess that it will come from the Super Secret Leprechaun Gold Emergency Fund, or maybe just from Nathan Deal's ass. Because it certainly isn't in the budget.

And that says it all, really. If DV were a priority, then funding for shelters wouldn't be an expendable political football. Full stop.

But then, for DV to be a priority, the GOP would have to admit that its vision of gender, family, and sexuality isn't the idyllic Fifties-as-seen-on-tv. Rather, defunding DV shelters emphasizes the fact that, like the GOP's "pro-life" ideology, their "pro-family" position is inherently violent, propping up the authority of abusers, no matter the cost to children and partners.

Conservative? Sure. Compassionate? Please.

If you live in Georgia and would like to contact your representatives and/or the governor's office, contact information can be found through Congress.org.

Open Wide...

If It's Thursday, It's The Soup Dragons!

For Spudsy:

Open Wide...

This is so the worst thing you're going to read today

[Trigger warning for sexual assault]

I was just reminiscing with Liss about the heady pre-9/11 days when I was a student volunteer for my local ACLU chapter. The highlight was clearly getting to briefly meet Molly Ivins.

This brings me to two of the earth-shatteringly novel arguments Wendy Kaminer makes in her Atlantic column, "Sexual Harassment and the Loneliness of the Civil Libertarian Feminist":

1) Why do feminists hate civil liberties?
2) Why don't you bitches lighten up already?

You may have heard that Yale has a wee problem with sexual assault. You may have also heard that a group of women have filed a Title IX complaint against Yale's failure to do anything about sexual harassment and assault.

[Spoiler alert] Kaminer is against these meek feminists' insistence that Yale do something. Because free speech. Because scare quotes. (Seriously, is there a section in the Chicago Manual of Style I can refer her to? That shit is out of hand in this article. "Bullying"? Really?)

Anyhow, there is a serious discussion to be had about the extent of our First Amendment rights, but not only is this not necessarily an appropriate context, it's also not actually what Kaminer appears to be going on about. Mostly she's pissed at feminists. Also: Kaminer is a "feminist".

Like, there's this:

Reviewing the charges of sexual harassment underlying the Title IX complaint by a group of Yale students and alumnae, I can't find feminism -- at least not if feminism includes independence, liberty, and power for women. Instead I find femininity -- the assumption that women are incapable of fending for themselves in the marketplace of epithets or ideas, the belief that women are rendered helpless by misogynist speech and the sexist tantrums of their male peers.

Fucking third-wave feminists being all feminine with their gingham and their heels, and, oh wait, what? Sexist tantrums, rape, whichever. Speaking of meek, feminine, and helpless: Fucking Title IX complaint to the fucking Department of Education. It's like whoa ladies, why don't you put down the lipstick and start standing up for yourself? I mean,
what accounts for such feminine timidity, this instinctive unwillingness or inability to talk or taunt back, without seeking the protection of university or government bureaucrats?
Remember ladies: next time a would-be rapist harasses you, say something unkind. The problem solves itself, really. Let's not built a movement that involves society writ large-- that shit's feminine.

Here's the thing. I'm willing to cede that people have the right to say bigoted things. You know, civil liberties! However, people don't have the right to make threats. Also, Yale? Is not some dude standing on a street corner. In fact, Yale's kinda a big deal. At least I've heard it's big back East.

Yale has women employees. (Inorite? Feminism FTW!) Yale is responsible for their safety, as well as the safety of an entire community of folks, including students-- some of whom are women. Yale even has a police department, which, you know, could take women's complaints about sexual harassment and rape seriously.

Regardless of whether or not "rape culture" is real [Spoiler alert: it is], Yale administrators have the right to speak up, and a responsibility to not foster an environment where women are intimated with threats of violence, and um, the actual physical violence that's actually happened at Yale. So, this whole Title IX business is not really about men saying and doing "stuff", but rather about Yale refusing to say and do stuff. You wouldn't know that from Kaminer's piece, though.

Via: @KateHarding

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime



The Staple Singers "When Will We Be Paid"

Open Wide...

The Latest on Budgetfuck 2011

UPDATE: @thinkprogress is reporting that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D) expects a shut-down, because although "the numbers are basically there on deficit reduction," the GOP "won't agree to keep the government running unless they defund Planned Parenthood."

The GOP are now officially holding the entire nation hostage over women's healthcare.

------------------------------

New York TimesObama Meeting Fails to End Stalemate Over Federal Budget:

President Obama and Congressional leaders said Wednesday that a late-night White House bargaining session produced no budget breakthrough that would avert a government shutdown this weekend but agreed the two sides had narrowed the issues in efforts to strike a deal.

Emerging from a 90-minute meeting with Senator Harry Reid, the majority leader, and Speaker John A. Boehner, the president said aides would work through the night and he and Mr. Reid expressed optimism that a compromise could be reached.

"I remain confident that if we're serious about getting something done, we should be able to complete a deal and get it passed and avert a shutdown," Mr. Obama said.
Looks like that biparisanship is working out GREAT. The tone of Washington has really changed since the last time a Democrat was president.

CNN—Government shutdown could affect operations at the White House:
The Executive Office of the President encompasses almost 50 different departments at the White House, ranging from the Executive Residence to the social secretary's office to the White House press secretary to the White House Counsel.

According to the Office of Management and Budget, the law exempts some employees from a furlough if their work is deemed essential during a shutdown. The OMB describes 'excepted employees' as those who are necessary for 'safety of human life and protection of property.' But there's also a clause of which exempts employees that 'perform certain other types of excepted work.' The meaning of that remains undefined."
And that's one tiny piece of the government that would be affected. As Michael Tomasky points out here: "A shutdown affects the economy immediately and directly. Hundreds of thousands of people in the public sector aren't working and therefore aren't spending. Hundreds of thousands more in the private sector who depend almost entirely, or at least largely, on government contracts for their livelihoods are out of luck. This is everyone from GM to pencil manufacturers. A huge swath of the economy just closes. If the shutdown lasts long enough, layoffs come along. Two bad months slow the tender momentum that now exists."

ABC News—Speaker Boehner on Budget Negotiations: 'No Daylight Between Tea Party and Me':
Speaker of the House John Boehner said he is in lockstep with the Tea Party on budget negotiations despite claims from Democrats that there could be a deal if only he could buck the Tea Party.

"Listen, there's no daylight between the Tea Party and me," Boehner told me [George Stephanopoulos] today during our exclusive interview.

"None?" I asked

"None. What they want is they want us to cut spending. They want us to deal with this crushing debt that's going to crush the future for our kids and grandkids. There's no daylight there," he said.
The profundity of my contempt is cavernous.

Meanwhile: "A prominent libertarian constitutional lawyer and civil libertarian has drafted an article of impeachment against President Obama over his attack on Libya, throwing down a legal gauntlet that could be picked up by some Congressional Republicans." Of course.

Open Wide...

Your Fee-Fees End Where My Body Begins

by Shaker Laurakeet, who's had it about up to here today.

I've only lived in Illinois for about seven years now, but in that time I've seen women's reproductive rights go through some highs and lows. Now, thanks to Judge John Belz, I've seen a good statute go out the window.

On April 5, 2011, Judge John Belz of the Sangamon County Circuit Court ruled that pharmacists are allowed to choose when they want to do the job they signed up for, at least when it comes to women's ability to control their reproductive autonomy.

This lawsuit was in response to then-Gov. Blagojevich's 2005 emergency order that requires pharmacists to stock and quickly fill prescriptions for emergency contraception, aka the morning-after pill.*

What these pharmacists should be saying is "my rights end where yours begin" (MREWYB). At least, that's how it's supposed to work.

The suit against Illinois came from two anti-choice pharmacists who own pharmacies and who, despite their training, seem to know jack shit about the reproductive system. They decided that they didn't want to sell emergency contraception because ABORTION and CONSCIENCE.

The pharmacists say EC drugs, like Plan B and ella, are tantamount to abortion because the hormone progestin thins the lining of the uterine wall, which could prevent a fertilized egg from implanting. This is also how anti-choicers argue that all hormonal contraceptives are abortifacents. Pregnancy is defined biologically as occurring once an embryo is implanted in the uterus. Emergency contraception will work up to three or five days after sex, depending on the exact drug, but it will do nothing if the person is already pregnant. Planned Parenthood has more information and FAQs about EC.

The best (i.e. worst) part? Since 2006, Plan B One-Step and Next Choice have been available without a prescription. You must be able to prove you are at least 17 and you have to ask a pharmacist to hand it to you, as it's kept behind the counter, but that's it. So, these pharmacists are unwilling to HAND YOU A BOX. It hurts their fee-fees.

But your fee-fees end where my body begins.

In his decision, Judge Belz wrote that the Illinois Attorney General provided "no evidence of a single person who ever was unable to obtain emergency contraception because of a religious objection. … Nor did the government provide any evidence that anyone was having difficulties finding willing sellers of over-the-counter Plan B, either at pharmacies or over the Internet."

This contrasts sharply with what advocates witnessed in 2005 when this statute took effect. One woman reported that an Osco Drug in Chicago wouldn't fill her prescription. (I can't seem to find out if this is one of the pharmacies owned by the assholes in question, but I wouldn't be surprised.) If the state simply couldn't find examples since the order went into effect, doesn't this just mean it was working? OH NO, SOMETHING IS WORKING, BREAK IT. (It's the Illinois way.)

According to the news stories, Judge Belz's decision also said that the state conceded that the health impact of overturning the statute "would be minimal." In what way? In the way that unintended pregnancy is a minimal life event? In the way that forces a woman to play pin-the-tail-on-the-pharmacy in order to secure an emergency medication to which she's got a legal right? In that knocking down a useful law that would guarantee access to basic, legal healthcare products won't have consequences beyond itself?

Attorney General Lisa Madigan says her office will appeal. For now, I can't find any teaspoon opportunities, but I'll keep my ear to the ground.

------------------------------

* It's worth noting that pharmacists do want to practice due diligence when distributing prescriptions. For example, after this statute originally went into effect in 2005, the American Pharmacists Association and others asked then-Governor Blagojevich to refine his emergency order to explain that filling emergency contraception prescriptions "without delay" would not interfere with pharmacists' ability to check for drug interactions, allergies, that sort of thing.

[Related Reading: On Conscience Clauses; HHS Rule Change Update.]

Open Wide...

Open Thread

Photobucket

Hosted by Coily.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Eastsidekate (on whose behalf I'm posting because James Franco): "When they make a major motion picture about your life, what song (or songs) are going to be in the soundtrack?"

Mine:

Bad Reputation / Joan Jett
Fat-Bottomed Girls / Queen
Shakespeare's Sister / The Smiths
Ain't Got No / Nina Simone
I Am Not a Robot / Marina and the Diamonds
Mahna Mahna / The Muppets

And a cover of All You Need Is Me sung by Tina Turner. That doesn't exist in the world, but what the fuck. It's my movie.

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

"Just finished cleaning the house. In other words, my closets and drawers are a mess!"—My friend Tom. (Posted with his permission.) That is so the story of my life, lol.

Open Wide...

Kentertainment Korner

I fucking love kalliteration.

Anyhow.

Item! Keanu Reeves talks Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure 3

Here's a rule I thought up while I wasn't sitting through The Matrix 3: if it's not written as a trilogy, you don't get two do-overs.

Speaking of sequels, I've got high hopes for Still Half-Baked, and Dude, Where's My Hybrid? See also: Not Insubstantial Speeds at Ridgemont Corners Office Park


More different item! The Academy of Wev has just reduced the number of Grammy GRAMMY GRAMMY!!!1!(TM) categories.

Like most Americans, I hate music and therefore don't actually watch the GRAMMYS. Anything that makes it possible for "CSI: Criminal Minds" to air before midnight is a-okay with me. However, I will note that they've merged several of the men's and women's categories. Well, that's worked out great with non-gendered categories for Best Motion Picture and Best Director awards at the Oscars. Just ask Kathryn Bigelow. Ladies, amirite?

Open Wide...