For The Fiscally Responsible Collector

Need some solid financial advice from Shakesville's resident Wall Street Insider™? (That's me, by the way!) Buy some of these! They are guaranteed to appreciate in value! It's practically like buying cash money at half off! It's all about the Benjamins! It's all about the Biebers! Yes! Get in on the ground floor of the Bieberdollar bubble!



[Image: Pack of Justin Bieber trading cards!]

5 cards! 1 sticker! No purchase necessary! (I have no idea! Shoplifting, what?) Stock up now! Rare and foil cards! And remember: After the Bieberpocalypse, the only currency recognized by the NBO (New Bieber Order; Glenn Beck's ghostwriters are already working on a new novel) will be the Bieberdollar! Don't be left behind! Don't be Left Behind! Ages 9+ only!

Open Wide...

State of the Union Open Thread


President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, and Speaker John Boehner. [Getty Images]

So the president gave a speech last night. So did Rep. Paul Ryan, who gave the official GOP response, as well as Rep. Michele Bachmann, who gave the Tea Party Caucus response. The Green Party response, which was not aired on television, naturally, is here.

Discuss!

Open Wide...

Open Thread

Photobucket

Hosted by Mork and Mindy toys.

Open Wide...

Stock up on cold ones, it's a manmergency!

[Trigger warning for misogyny and gender essentialism]

We live in a world where it's still controversial to openly discuss the scale of the GRID AIDS crisis, where migraines, if the dominant culture is to be believed, are primarily caused by reading too many Danielle Steele novels, and where women are encouraged to squirt toxins down there into their vaginae to promote health. In this world, still reeling from a prolonged he-cession, I give you the latest public health emergency: MANFLU!

The Daily Mail (sigh):

"Women have suspected it for years – and finally, they have proof: when it comes to illness, scientists say men really are wimps.

According to research, the working man is much more likely to succumb to a cold than his female colleague when the pressure’s on."

Yes, men, why do you have to be so feminine and sick? Can't you learn to be fighters?

The Scotsman [Edinburgh] has a pretty good take down of the research and the accompanying Mail story. Since my sweetie tells me CBS' The Early Show covered this super serious story this morning (as of this writing, they don't have anything online), here are a few thoughts:

The study The Mail cited involved surveying workers from 40 South Korean manufacturing firms. So, the results are (as always) grounded in a specific cultural and socioeconomic context.

Researchers asked participants if they thought they had caught a cold in the past 4 months. I briefly worked for some epidemiologists, and this methodology is certainly, um, easy? It's like that time when NIH asked 50,000 bank employees if they suffered from any undiagnosed cancers. Except in this case, it actually happened.

Here's a fun fact: the South Korean study found that women were more likely than men to get colds. Whoops!

The manflu (or man cold, as The Scotsman helpfully points out) is all in the interaction between reported stress and reported illness. Men who reported being under more stress were more likely to report that they had a cold in the past four months. There wasn't a correlation between reported stress and reported illness in women.

This might be an interesting finding. I mean, why might this be the case?

Maybe women tend to be under more stress than men, what with that oppression business and all. That could overwhelm any effects of workplace stress.

Maybe men are more likely to be in management positions than women, which, if correlated with stress (positively or negatively), could make the statistics tricky.

Maybe (um, probably absolutely) there are gendered implications of reporting stress and illness.

Maybe (absolutely) there are gendered aspects of socialization that impact perceptions of stress and illness.

Or maybe men are a bunch of girls and therefore we should feel sorry for them, because unlike girls, they are more likely to get sick (except they aren't).

Tough call.

Open Wide...

The State of the Union Pub Is Open


President Obama will be giving his State of the Union address tonight, starting at 9pm EST. (Find out how/where to watch it live online here.) The seating will be bipartisan, Obama will propose a five-year spending freeze on non-defense spending, and Michele Bachmann will deliver an unofficial rebuttal.

I just received an excerpt of the speech as prepared, and this is part of it:
Half a century ago, when the Soviets beat us into space with the launch of a satellite called Sputnik¸ we had no idea how we'd beat them to the moon. The science wasn't there yet. NASA didn't even exist.

But after investing in better research and education, we didn't just surpass the Soviets; we unleashed a wave of innovation that created new industries and millions of new jobs.

This is our generation's Sputnik moment.
Wait, what?! No. That should be "This is our generation's Apollo moment," right? Unless the president intends to suggest this is the moment we are surpassed by a burgeoning superpower who has the will to invest in better research and education. Which, admittedly, would probably be honest but not very inspiring, lol.

It's gonna be a long night, Shakers.

Anyone got any suggestions for a good virtual drinking game? Deeky says take a shot every time he says "fiscal responsibility," and I say take a shot every time he says "bipartisan." If he says "people of faith," down the bottle.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Pretending, naturally, that Hell exists, we're all going there (no doy), and it's comprised entirely of a screening room with a single uncomfortable chair molded perfectly to your ass, what movie, if forced to watch over and over on a loop for eternity, would constitute your personal Hell?

(I mean, I know any movie over and over for eternity would be hellish, so, for the pedants among us, please feel free to read the question as: What movie would you least like to watch three times in a row?)

My answer: Barry Lyndon, for sheer unsurpassed dullery. Ugh, Stanley Kubrick. UGH.

Open Wide...

Whoooooooooops

Sexy News Anchors Distract Male Viewers.

Whoooooooooops! Straight Male Viewers' Ability to Concentrate Undermined by Lifelong Socialization to Sexually Objectify Women.

B-b-but it's in their BRAINZ!!! Blah blah evo psych blah!

Yes. That's true. And brains wired to see things one way will start seeing them another way within a matter of days when forced to do so. And brains that hold socialized biases, like associating dark skin with a lack of ethics, release those biases when exposed to counter-narratives on a regular basis. And brains that are remapped with cognitive behavior therapy can stop doing things they have done for years.

The thing about brains, and how they perceive things, is that they're adaptable based on the external factors to which we subject them. That's demonstrably evident, even granting that we may be predisposed to certain psychological patterns and processes.

But something about sex and gender makes us certain everything is hard-wired.

That's just how men are! You know what women are like! Boys will be boys. She's such a girl. He's a man's-man. She's a girly-girl. Men can't help it. Women can't help it. That's just how they're born.

We don't feel socialization happening, which is why it's so easy to believe that our brains are just built one way or another by biology and that's that.

Easy beliefs are often the most dangerous ones.

Open Wide...

Photos of the Day

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (right) and Spain's Foreign Minister Trinidad Jimenez at a press conference after their meeting at the State Department in Washington January 25, 2011. [Reuters Pictures]
US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (right) walks with Mexican Foreign Minister Patricia Espinosa (left) on a one-day trip to Mexico through the streets of Guanajuato, January 24, 2011, prior to lunch at Teatro Juarez. [Getty Images]
Saudi talk show host Hiba Jamal (left) takes a picture of US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (right) with Lebanese presenter Rania Barghut after recording a special episode of the Arabic ladies' talk show 'Kalam Nawaem' at Zayed University in Abu Dhabi on January 10, 2011, to be broadcast on the Saudi-owned MBC-1 satellite channel. [Getty Images]
When I was a little girl, I never saw images of women like this in the news. Even when I saw pictures of British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, she was almost always the only woman in the picture. More often than not, Clinton is still the only woman in the picture, too, wearing her brightly colored suit in a sea of pinstriped charcoal. When I see pictures like these, they make me blub with joy.

I long for the day when they don't, because they are so routine as to be totally unremarkable.

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute


brown and white Cavalier King Charles spaniel on brown leather sofa
Dexter: "There's a bug on the ceiling!"

Open Wide...

Chipping Away at Roe

In Texas:

On the 38th anniversary of Roe vs. Wade, Governor Rick Perry told the crowd at the "Rally For Life" that the Supreme Court's decision is a tragedy and Texas would no longer sit idly by.

John Seago, Senior Legislative Associate with Texas Right To Life, says with the Republican supermajority, the bill [which would require women seeking abortions to undergo a sonogram] has a strong chance of becoming law.

...In addition to the sonogram, the bill would require women to hear a doctor explain the physical characteristics of the fetus as well as listen to audio of the heartbeat.
Because women are stupid babies who don't know what being pregnant means.

I don't know how many different ways I can say this, and I've already said it what feels like 3,000 times in the last six years, but forcing a woman to stare at an ultrasound and listen to a heartbeat will not change the fact that that woman does not want to have a child. Even if it changes her mind about terminating the pregnancy, it doesn't change whatever circumstances brought her to an abortion clinic in the first place.

She'll still walk out just as devoid of choices, just as un- or underemployed, just as broke, just as in debt, just as uninsured, just as lacking daycare, just as unable to care for herself and/or her existing children, just as in need of medication that she can't take while pregnant, just as enmeshed in an unhealthy or abusive relationship, just the same as she was when she walked in.

She'll just have been guilted into making sacrifices she doesn't want to make, to honor someone else's mistaken perceptions about her morality.

All of these "LOOK IT'S A BABY!" barriers to termination are utter hogwash, rooted in the damnable fairy tale that women are incapable of making the best decisions for themselves and their own bodies (and, frequently, for the children they already have).

The reality is this: There is an inextricable link between the economy, the funding of social services, and abortion. If "pro-lifers" really wanted women to want to have babies, they would stop forcing them to look at ultrasounds and start arguing for universal healthcare, just for a fucking start.

[H/T to @PeterDaou.]

Open Wide...

"Let's Talk"

by Shaker Superior Olive

So, if you've been watching Canadian TV lately, and I know you have, then you've probably seen this commercial (transcript at end) starring Clara Hughes, 6-time Olympic medalist.

(There is a another, longer video here, for which there's a transcript at the end of the post, as well as a French version here for which I apologize for not providing a transcript, but my French isn't that good, lol!)

The commercial is Clara Hughes for Bell Canada, talking about mental health, and introducing the company's Let's Talk initiative. On February 9th, for every long distance call and text message its customers make, Bell Canada will donate 5¢ to mental health related programs across the country. The initiative was launched last fall, but this is the first I've heard of it, through this commercial. More information on their initiatives and goals can be found on their website under the Gain Perspective and Bell Initiatives links.

(Note: By the way, all of Bell's commercials are structured around the blue "Bell" in a white space like this one, and the music at the end is the same as in their other commercials, if you were wondering why it's so chipper for a mental health commercial, lol.)

What caught my attention was someone as well-known and high-profile as Clara Hughes as the spokesperson. I've been reading about her for years, but I was quite surprised to hear that Clara Hughes had battled depression.

For those unfamiliar with her, here's what I know about her: She's from my hometown, Winnipeg; she won two bronze medals in road cycling at the Atlanta Olympic games; she switched to speed skating, a sport she had previously tried as a teenager, and won bronze in the 3000k in Salt Lake City, making her one of only a handful of atheletes to win medals in both summer and winter Olympics; at the Torino Olympics she won silver in the team pursuit and gold in the 5000k, making her the only athelete to ever win multiple medals in both summer and winter Olympics; and finally another bronze in Vancouver in the 5000k. After winning gold, she also donated $10,000 of her own money (i.e. not a medal bonus) to Right to Play, announcing it in an interview hoping to inspire Canadians to donate to the organization. She's a highly recognizable and beloved Canadian.

I'm not sure when it was, in relation to her professional timeline, that she was, in her words, battling depression for two years.

She's an interesting choice of spokesperson, because the image I, and I think most Canadians who've watched her, have is that of a bubbly, smiling, generous, and overall happy personality. To hear that someone so successful and with such a seemingly sunny disposition has/had depression can be surprising to those unfamiliar with depression, in a good way. Part of the stigma of depression and other mental health issues is that nobody ever thinks that someone like that would have to deal with it. Clara Hughes challenges stereotypes about mental illness.

I admit I'm a bit biased, as I admire and have had a huge crush on her for ages, but I'm pretty impressed with this initiative. It's rare to see a company doing their philanthropic work in the area of mental health, and Clara Hughes as a spokesperson is an excellent choice. I'm interested in seeing where this initiative goes, if it does ease some of the stigma around mental health issues (or not).

What do you think?

Transcripts:

30-Second Commercial:

A shot of Clara Hughes standing on top of the "e" in Bell, tall and confident.

Clara Hughes: Hi! You may know me as a six-time Olympic medalist in both the summer and winter olympics. What you might not know about me…

camera pans down the "e" to another Clara sitting down, in a different shirt, this time a head and shoulders shot, leaning forward, elbows on knees pose.

…is that for two difficult years I battled depression. One in five Canadians is affected by mental illness, and many will not get the help they need because they're afraid to talk about it. And this has to change. So, on February 9th, let's talk.

Clara holds up an iPod or other large-screened phone in front of her mouth: the phone has a proportional picture of her smiling mouth. music plays as camera zooms out to show both Claras, one standing on top of the “e”, the other sitting in front of it text reads: Bell Let's Talk bell.ca/letstalk

---------------------------

Longer Video:


A shot of Hughes standing against a white background

Being committed to sport for over 20 years and being an Olympic athlete, I've obviously had to overcome a lot of obstacles, including countless crashes and lots of bumps and bruises along the way. But that's just the physical side, the kind of injuries that often heal on their own. Mentally, it's a different story. Sport can be difficult on a person, but so can everyday life. No matter what we're doing, it's important that we have support mechanisms in place. And that means making sure that we're up to the tasks and challenges before us, and if we're not, then turning to others for the help that we need.

It's not by accident that high-performance athletes depend on physiologists and psychologists as part of what I like to call the Circle of Strength. All of those people who, as an athlete, I rely on for comfort, courage, technical support, and on and on. I think the same can be said for society overall. At times we need others, including leaders in the business world like Bell, to be part of our larger Circle of Strength. There are a lot of organizations around the world that are doing tremendous good through their philanthropic programs, and I count Bell among them.

Mental health is a perfect case in point. It affects everyone, yet it impacts each of us differently on an individual basis. And, all too often, the stigma surrounding it prevents people from getting the help that they need. Bell understands that mental health is a huge issue, and I applaud them for doing something about it.

text appears: Bell Let's Talk bce.ca/mentalhealth

Open Wide...

This is so the worst thing you're going to read all day.

[Trigger warning for discussion of eating habits and associating morality with eating. Also: Classism.]

Kurt Gray never actually says in "Self-control from Helping Others" that fat people are immoral and lazy. He only says that doing good deeds helps people increase their self-control so they can "dodge the cheesecake" and "resist the office donuts better" and "stick to their workout routine."

And he never actually says that poor people are immoral and lazy. He merely suggests over and over that being able to provide financial charity to others is a good deed that make you physically stronger: "Those who donated a dollar to charity could hold up a weight significantly longer than those who kept a dollar." Never mind that he fails to provide any context for why those people kept their dollar. Greed, as is the implicit suggestion? Or were the people who kept dollars people who had experienced poverty in their lives, or were currently in poverty?

Is there any possibility that people feel physically weakened by the stigma of accepting charity...?

I mean, after all, we live in a culture where Harvard-trained social psychologists write articles that tacitly marginalize the already-marginalized and more deeply entrench narratives that fat/poor people are immoral and lazy, while privileged people are told that their privilege is evidence of morality and hard work.

That seems like maybe it could get demoralizing. Ahem.

Open Wide...

Pharmacist update

A week or so ago I wrote about an Idaho pharmacist who refused to fill a prescription for methergine, a bleeding control medication, as ordered for a patient by a nurse practitioner from Planned Parenthood. To recall: the NP ordered the meds, the pharmacist asked if it was needed to due an abortion, NP refused to disclose, pharmacist refused to fill medication. Planned Parenthood filed a letter of complaint against the pharmacist with the Idaho Board of Pharmacy. The Board has now said:

BOISE -- The Idaho Board of Pharmacy has concluded a Nampa Walgreen's pharmacist did not break any state laws when she allegedly refused to fill a prescription last year.

[...]

Planned Parenthood said the pharmacist's actions were dangerous but the board said since the prescription was obtained from another pharmacy, no danger was presented.
Planned Parenthood is now considering reporting the pharmacist to federal agencies in regards to the attempt at HIPAA violations.

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime



Marilyn Manson: "Dope Hat"

Open Wide...

Bush Administration Broke Elections Law

It's so fun to see all of us "unhinged liberal bloggers suffering from Bush Derangement Syndrome" be proven right long after the fact about our continually-blogged contention that the Bush administration was breaking the law.

Did I say fun? I meant enraging.

The Bush White House, particularly before the 2006 midterm elections, routinely violated a federal law that prohibits use of federal tax dollars to pay for political activities by creating a "political boiler room" that coordinated Republican campaign activities nationwide, a report issued Monday by an independent federal agency concludes.

The report by the Office of Special Counsel finds that the Bush administration's Office of Political Affairs — overseen by Karl Rove — served almost as an extension of the Republican National Committee, developing a "target list" of Congressional races, organizing dozens of briefings for political appointees to press them to work for party candidates, and sending cabinet officials out to help these campaigns.

...The Office of Special Counsel, a relatively obscure federal agency, is charged with enforcing the Hatch Act, a 1939 law that prohibits federal employees from engaging in partisan political activity. Certain members of the White House political staff — including the top aides at the Office of Political Affairs — are exempt, as are the president, vice president and members of the cabinet. But the law still prohibits the use of federal money, even by these officials, to support political causes.

...The investigators also found evidence that the Bush White House improperly classified travel by senior officials as official government business, "when it was, in fact, political," and the costs associated with this travel were never reimbursed.
Which means that the taxpayers were paying for Republican political activity.

Now that the Bush administration has left office, the Office of Special Counsel has no jurisdiction to pursue charges, and will have to make a formal referral to the Justice Department, which is currently declining to comment on whether charges will be filed.

Given the Obama administration's eminent willingness to cover the Bush administration's ass on violations of the Presidential Records Act, and given that Obama's White House had "its own version of the Office of Political Affairs" until last week, I'm guessing we're not going to see a vigorous pursuit of justice, ahem.

Congratulations, BushCo. You got away with it again.

[Previously: Warrantless Wiretapping Program Ruled Illegal, No Charges in Destruction of Torture Tapes, Bush Admits Being a War Criminal.]

Open Wide...

Visitors Welcome

[Trigger warning for sexist language.]

There was some good news on the healthcare front last week: any hospital that accepts Medicare or Medicaid has to allow the patient to put anyone they choose on their visitor's list. That means that no hospital can refuse to let anyone who is not part of what the hospital defines as "family" be at their bedside.

It's a radical step toward embracing an approach to "family" that breaks us out of the Dad, Mom, Bud and Sis configuration that still looms so large in the American imagination and in its laws despite the fact that fewer and fewer of us live in those family units. Now you can be by your best friend's side whether you're Carmelite nuns or used to play soccer together, or work together or look alike or not. It doesn't matter whether your aunt approves of you and your "shiksa whore" girlfriend or your transgender spouse, so long as your cousin wants you there.

Of course policy is only as good as we are when it comes to enforcement: people should know about the new visitation rules and ask for them when they're not offered—and they won't always be, for a lot of reasons, ranging from administrators' lack of knowledge to prejudice.

But what a joy to know that the option now exists: that we no longer need to be afraid of letting down the people we love when they need us most.
That means that situations like the story of Janice Langbehn and Lisa Pond won't happen again. And I'm sure that as soon as the Family Research Council hears about this they will raise holy hell. Because, according to their name, they're the only ones who can define what a family is.

HT to Balloon Juice.

Crossposted from Bark Bark Woof Woof.

Open Wide...

Oscar Nominations

They're here.

A couple of observations: No female directors, yet again. Too bad not a single person of color acted in any movies this year. How the fuck was True Grit's Hailee Steinfeld a supporting actress?!

I hope The King's Speech wins everything.

UPDATE: This email from Iain, with the subject header "Outrage," arrived just as I was posting the above, which I'm sharing with his permission:

Why the fuck is Jeff Bridges nominated for Best Actor and Hailee Steinfeld nominated for Best Supporting Actress for True Grit? She has more screen time than he does and is the main character. Also, in my opinion Hailee's performance was the most impactful, which is saying something as Jeff Bridges was on good form and he is a fucking legend while she is about three years old. If they were both nominated for Best Actor/Actress that would have been okay, but truly, it should be the other way around.

Also, as usual the Best Actress nominations are all for women who starred in small movies that very few people have seen. Other than Black Swan I don't recall seeing trailers for them, or even hearing anybody discuss them. I don't think we seriously talked about going to see any of them so they probably didn't have a wide release.

So the moral of this story is that women almost never land lead roles in large productions, and that when they do, they will be nominated for Best Supporting Actress while the subordinate male actors in the same movie get nominated for Best Actor.

The Academy is making even less sense than usual this year.
Iain and I did, briefly, talk about The Kids Are All Right, after I wrote about it. But I don't blame him for forgetting, since it opened on seven screens in the US.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

Photobucket

Hosted by a Thundercats lunchbox.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

What movie line do you quote most often?

I probably say "These aren't the droids you're looking for" more than anything else. When I'm in a situation over which I have no control, and I want to amusingly express my futile desire to change it, I wave my hand and say, "These aren't the droids you're looking for."

Or when I feel super-powerful and want to convey my (inevitably fleeting) sense of potency, I wave my hand and say, "These aren't the droids you're looking for."

This usually makes Iain laugh and say, "That is literally why I married you, right there."

[Obi-Wan Kenobi and Luke Skywalker pull up to an Empire checkpoint in Luke's hovercraft; R2-D2 and C-3PO are in the back. Two stormtroopers walk up to the hovercraft.]

Stormtrooper: How long have you had these droids?

Luke: About three or four seasons.

Obi-Wan: They're for sale if you want them.

Stormtrooper: Let me see your identification.

Obi-Wan [waving his hand]: You don't need to see his identification.

Stormtrooper: We don't need to see his identification.

Obi-Wan: These aren't the droids you're looking for.

Stormtrooper: These aren't the droids we're looking for.

Obi-Wan: He can go about his business.

Stormtrooper: You can go about your business.

Obi-Wan [to the perplexed Luke]: Move along.

Stormtrooper [waving them along]: Move along. Move along.

[Luke pulls away.]

Open Wide...

Hey, No Strings Attached, I GET IT


So, there are like a zillion reasons that the new Natalie Portman-Ashton Kutcher film No Strings Attached looks like garbage farts, and I'm not even going to bother getting into a feminist critique of the plot as represented by the trailers, because we could be here all year.

I am merely going to say: I GET IT THERE ARE STRINGS ATTACHED.

There is no need to put balloons and tampon references and "I've Got the World on a String" (lol I am being hit in the head with string metaphors!) in your trailers. We're all adults here and we know that if there were REALLY no strings attached, there would be NO PLOT, not even the thin cardboard excuse for a substantial story upon which this terrible-looking film no doubt turns.

STRIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINGS!

I can only guess now that No Strings Attached is #1 at the box office (where's my foam finger?!), we'll be getting the customary second round of trailers with new and even FUNNER clips to try to convince reluctant movie-goers to go drop their hard-earned string cash on this movie; I will bet one container of the finest dental floss that we will be privy to at least one scene of Ashton Kutcher playing with a yo-yo and one scene of Natalie Portman looking adorable while wearing an unraveling sweater and sitting next to a kitten playing with a ball of yarn.

I only hope that I don't need to insert a SPOILER WARNING in front of my guess that Ashton Kutcher's character is a PROFESSOR OF STRING THEORY LULZ.

Open Wide...