[TW for violence.]
The stereotype of conservatives being a collection of cranky white people reeking of patriarchy and privilege exists for a reason: Despite there being conservatives of color, conservative women who consider themselves to be feminists, conservatives who are young or poor or in some other way defy the stereotype, conservatism remains primarily a movement shaped, led, and populated by rich, white, older, straight, cis men. They know that's a problem, in a country that increasingly looks less and less like them, so they make loud sounds about having a big tent. But there's apparently one place where they draw the line: you can't be gay and be conservative.
Two of the nation's premier moral issues organizations, the Family Research Council and Concerned Women for America, are refusing to attend the Conservative Political Action Conference in February because a homosexual activist group, GOProud, has been invited.
"We've been very involved in CPAC for over a decade and have managed a couple of popular sessions. However, we will no longer be involved with CPAC because of the organization's financial mismanagement and movement away from conservative principles," said Tom McClusky, senior vice president for FRCAction.
As Steve Benen notes, perhaps they're afraid of
gay cooties and that's why they're acting like a middle-school clique. But what I find more interesting is why there is such a thing as a group of gay people who are conservative in the first place.
Not all conservatives are anti-gay, of course; many of them supported the end of Don't Ask Don't Tell and there are a number of them,
Theodore Olson most notably, who support the idea of marriage equality. But they are in the minority, and, ironically, it is those who are the most ardent followers of a philosophy that preaches "love thy neighbor" and "let all come unto me" who are the most vitriolic in their hatred.
Of course, people have a right to follow whatever political conviction they believe in regardless of their sexual orientation. But given the history of gay rights in this country and that it is the conservatives who have done everything they possibly can to demonize, criminalize, and even propose that people should be designated as unworthy of citizenship because of their sexual orientation, it boggles the mind that anyone who is openly gay would align themselves with the conservative movement. Lower taxes doesn't really mean a whole lot when your taxes go to pay for things you can't participate in such as filing joint returns or, as is the case in Florida, the adoption of children by gays or lesbians. "Smaller government and more freedom" rings hollow when you're talking about banning gay teachers from the classroom or taking your movement to
Uganda where just being gay would become a crime punishable by death.
It says something about the odd priorities of those who would put their political beliefs ahead of their own rights as full participants in citizenship. To turn the
Groucho Marx quote on its head, why would anyone want to belong to a group that doesn't want to have you as a member?
Cross-posted from
Bark Bark Woof Woof.
Open Wide...
Shut Up!
Geraldine Doyle, who was the inspiration for the WWII "Rosie the Riveter" poster, 
