Your Morning TSA Security Round-Up

[Trigger warning for general harm.]

If you've got nothing to hide, you shouldn't be worried about enhanced security screening, right? RIGHT?!

TSA Groin Searches Menstruating Woman—"I was subjected to search so invasive that I was left crying and dealing with memories that I thought had been dealt with years ago of prior sexual assaults. Why? Because of my flannel panty-liner. These new scans are so horrible that if you are wearing something unusual (like a piece of cloth on your panties) then you will be subjected to a search where a woman repeatedly has to check your 'groin' while another woman watches on (two in my case - they were training in a new girl - awesome). So please, please, tell the ladies not to wear their liners at the airport (I didn't even have an insert in). I'm a strong, confident woman; I'm an Army vet (which is why those camo liners crack me up), I work full-time and go to graduate school full-time, I have a wonderful husband, and I don't take any nonsense from anyone. I don't dramatize, and I don't exaggerate. I'm trying to give you a sense of who I am so you won't think that this is a plea for attention, or a jumping on the bandwagon about the recent TSA proposed boycott. I just don't want another woman to have to go through the 'patting down' because she didn't know that her glad-rag would be a matter of national security."

Christian Science MonitorFor sexual crime victims, TSA pat-downs can be 're-traumatizing':

“Any type of violation of physical boundaries can set back a rape survivor in their treatment, in their therapy, in their recovery,” says [Dr. Amy Menna, a counselor and professor at the University of South Florida who has a decade’s experience researching and treating rape survivors].

“There’s a lack of sensitivity to individuals’ emotional states when undergoing this public violation,” she adds, citing the dismissive brusqueness of the procedure.

Many passengers don't know – and aren’t informed – ­that they have the right to a private screening, or to have another person present at that private screening.

“Know your rights,” Menna says, “and make sure they are not violated.”
GSLfa—How the TSA policies impact transgender travelers, from the National Center for Transgender Equality: "First, it is important that you KNOW YOUR RIGHTS. Even if TSA personnel are not always familiar with travelers' rights, such as the right to decline a full-body scan, you should know them. You may need to politely inform the officer of your rights and choices.

CNN—Shooting video at a TSA checkpoint? Here's what you should know: "As Americans fly to and from Thanksgiving holiday gatherings this week, some travelers -- anxious about their rights at airport security checkpoints -- may try to follow Tyner's lead and video their TSA encounters. Is that legal? It depends."

Gothamist—Guy Shows Up in Boxers As Fliers Opt Out Of Opt-Out Day: "I wore my underwear to remind all the people who submit to security procedures that they have options besides blind compliance."

Open Wide...

Thanksgiving

Things will be pretty quiet around here today and tomorrow, since it's the Thanksgiving weekend in the US.

To everyone who is marking Thanksgiving...Happy Thanksgiving!

To everyone who is not...Happy Thursday!

On this day, I recommend (re)reading Renee's great guest post, "What Are We Really Giving Thanks For?"

And on this day, I would also like to say that I am thankful for you, Shakers.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

Photobucket

Hosted by Those Darn Accordions!

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

If you were to have the good fortune of an admired singer/songwriter/lyricist offering to compose/sing a song just for you, by whom would that offer be made?

(If hearing impaired Shakers, or anyone else, would prefer to answer what poet they would chose to write a poem just for them, please feel free to modify.)

Open Wide...

America 2.0

Glenn Greenwald: Anatomy of a journalistic smear job.

And therein lies the most odious premise in this smear piece: anyone who doesn't quietly, meekly and immediately submit to Government orders and invasions -- or anyone who stands up to government power and challenges it -- is inherently suspect. Just as the establishment-worshiping, political-power-defending Ruth Marcus taught us today in The Washington Post, objecting to what the Government is doing here is just immature and ungrateful; mature, psychologically healthy people shut up and submit. That's how you prove that you're a normal, responsible, upstanding good citizen: by not making waves, doing what you're told, declaring yourself a loyal Republican or Democrat and then cheering for your team, and -- most of all -- accepting in the name of Fear that you must suffer indignities, humiliations and always-increasing loss of liberties at the hands of unchallengeable functionaries of the state.

Open Wide...

Today's Edition of "Conniving and Sinister"

[Trigger warning for TSA enhanced screening references.]



Blank

See Deeky's archive of all previous Conniving & Sinister strips here.

[In which Liss reimagines the long-running comic "Frank & Ernest," about two old straight white guys "telling it like it is," as a fat feminist white woman (Liss) and a biracial queerbait (Deeky) telling it like it actually is from their perspectives. Hilarity ensues.]

Open Wide...

Just a Big Misunderstanding

by Shaker RedSonja

[Trigger warning for stalking, controlling suitor, general menace.]

This link popped up in my Facebook feed today from Kate Harding. It's the story of a poor, misunderstood dude who, after what appears to be single coffee date, felt entitled to "check up" on a woman after she declined his offer of a dinner date. With a concealed loaded gun.

On Nov. 17th, Thomas Hackbarth parked outside a Planned Parenthood clinic after hours and got out of his car with a gun tucked into the waistband of his pants. Unsurprisingly, the Planned Parenthood security guard called the police. Imagine their surprise at this story:

He said Tuesday that he is not familiar with the Highland Park area and didn't know he was at Planned Parenthood when he pulled into the empty lot so that he could look for a woman he had met online.

Hackbarth said he had coffee with the woman on Nov. 15, and asked her to dinner the next night but she told him she couldn't because of a commitment she had with a female friend in Highland Park. Hackbarth said he felt that she might have been seeing a man instead, so he parked his car and walked around the block looking for her car.

…"I was not a jealous boyfriend," said Hackbarth, who is in the process of divorcing his wife of 25 years. "I was just trying to check up on her. It's totally a misunderstanding."

Hackbarth [who has a permit to carry a concealed weapon] said that he always carries his fully loaded gun, and understands why the security guard was alarmed.
Who the hell decides that, after meeting someone for coffee, you are immediately entitled—nay, obligated—to make sure that she's not with another man?! Oh, stalkery entitled douchebags with unchecked privilege and no sense of boundaries who believe that women are their property and have no respect for their autonomy, that's who!

While stalking is frightening enough, the loaded gun makes this even scarier. Hackbarth does have a permit for concealed carry, so his actions weren't illegal. But since he began his controlling behavior immediately after meeting this woman, I'm skeptical of his ability to shrug off this event—and, from his twisted perspective, her "lie"—without having a douchetantrum of massive proportions. When guys like this escalate, altercations easily become fatal with the addition of a loaded gun to the mix.

I sincerely hope this woman has a strong support system around her, as I would be terrified at the moment. And IANAL, but I'm guessing that this story alone isn't enough to get an order of protection, despite its being full of more red flags than a World Cup final. Which says something about our society—a man admittedly stalking a woman to check up on her with a loaded weapon isn't cause enough to make him legally stay away. Ugh.

Oh, by the way: Thomas Hackbarth is an eight-term Minnesota state legislator. Are you terribly surprised to find out he's an anti-choice Republican? Smelling salts for everyone, please!

Open Wide...

The 100 Books

The origin of this meme is, to quote one source, "murky and mysterious". I got it from some reliable friends who both say it is a list that the BBC says "most people will have read only six of the 100 books" listed below.

I could get really picky and say that since the entire Harry Potter canon is included, all you have to do is read those seven books and you're ahead. There also seem to be some redundancies; how can you list The Complete Works of William Shakespeare and Hamlet and count them separately? The same with The Chronicles of Narnia and The Lion, The Witch, and the Wardrobe. I also quibble with the inclusion of the entire Harry Potter series and only one of the Arthur Ransome books, but that's me. They're are all fiction, which is why they included The Bible and left off A Brief History of Time by Stephen Hawking.

I have no idea what the criterion was for the selection process; certainly it wasn't the quality of the writing or else they wouldn't have included such crap as The DaVinci Code. (If so, my respect for the BBC is destroyed.) I'm guessing it's based on popularity and sales. But then, there are some books on here I've never heard of, and I consider myself to be fairly well-read.

Anyway, Open Wide for the list.

1 Pride and Prejudice - Jane Austen

2 The Lord of the Rings - J.R.R. Tolkien

3 Jane Eyre - Charlotte Bronte

4 Harry Potter series - J.K. Rowling

5 To Kill a Mockingbird - Harper Lee

6 The Bible

7 Wuthering Heights - Emily Bronte

8 Nineteen Eighty Four - George Orwell

9 His Dark Materials - Philip Pullman

10 Great Expectations - Charles Dickens

11 Little Women - Louisa M Alcott

12 Tess of the D’Urbervilles - Thomas Hardy

13 Catch 22 - Joseph Heller

14 Complete Works of Shakespeare

15 Rebecca - Daphne Du Maurier

16 The Hobbit - J.R.R. Tolkien

17 Birdsong - Sebastian Faulk

18 Catcher in the Rye - J.D. Salinger

19 The Time Traveler’s Wife - Audrey Niffenegger

20 Middlemarch - George Eliot

21 Gone With The Wind - Margaret Mitchell

22 The Great Gatsby - F. Scott Fitzgerald

23 Bleak House - Charles Dickens

24 War and Peace - Leo Tolstoy

25 The Hitch Hiker’s Guide to the Galaxy - Douglas Adams

27 Crime and Punishment - Fyodor Dostoyevsky

28 Grapes of Wrath - John Steinbeck

29 Alice in Wonderland - Lewis Carroll

30 The Wind in the Willows - Kenneth Grahame

31 Anna Karenina - Leo Tolstoy

32 David Copperfield - Charles Dickens

33 Chronicles of Narnia - C.S. Lewis

34 Emma -Jane Austen

35 Persuasion - Jane Austen

36 The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe - C.S. Lewis

37 The Kite Runner - Khaled Hosseini

38 Captain Corelli’s Mandolin - Louis De Bernieres

39 Memoirs of a Geisha - Arthur Golden

40 Winnie the Pooh - A.A. Milne

41 Animal Farm - George Orwell

42 The Da Vinci Code - Dan Brown

43 One Hundred Years of Solitude - Gabriel Garcia Marquez

44 A Prayer for Owen Meaney - John Irving

45 The Woman in White - Wilkie Collins

46 Anne of Green Gables - L.M. Montgomery

47 Far From The Madding Crowd - Thomas Hardy

48 The Handmaid’s Tale - Margaret Atwood

49 Lord of the Flies - William Golding

50 Atonement - Ian McEwan

51 Life of Pi - Yann Martel

52 Dune - Frank Herbert

53 Cold Comfort Farm - Stella Gibbons

54 Sense and Sensibility - Jane Austen

55 A Suitable Boy - Vikram Seth

56 The Shadow of the Wind - Carlos Ruiz Zafon

57 A Tale Of Two Cities - Charles Dickens

58 Brave New World - Aldous Huxley

59 The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time - Mark Haddon

60 Love In The Time Of Cholera - Gabriel Garcia Marquez

61 Of Mice and Men - John Steinbeck

62 Lolita - Vladimir Nabokov

63 The Secret History - Donna Tartt

64 The Lovely Bones - Alice Sebold

65 Count of Monte Cristo - Alexandre Dumas

66 On The Road - Jack Kerouac

67 Jude the Obscure - Thomas Hardy

68 Bridget Jones’s Diary - Helen Fielding

69 Midnight’s Children - Salman Rushdie

70 Moby Dick - Herman Melville

71 Oliver Twist - Charles Dickens

72 Dracula - Bram Stoker

73 The Secret Garden - Frances Hodgson Burnett

74 Notes From A Small Island - Bill Bryson

75 Ulysses - James Joyce

76 The Inferno - Dante

77 Swallows and Amazons - Arthur Ransome

78 Germinal - Emile Zola

79 Vanity Fair - William Makepeace Thackeray

80 Possession - A.S. Byatt

81 A Christmas Carol - Charles Dickens

82 Cloud Atlas - David Mitchell

83 The Color Purple - Alice Walker

84 The Remains of the Day - Kazuo Ishiguro

85 Madame Bovary - Gustave Flaubert

86 A Fine Balance - Rohinton Mistry

87 Charlotte’s Web - E.B. White

88 The Five People You Meet In Heaven - Mitch Albom

89 Adventures of Sherlock Holmes - Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

90 The Faraway Tree Collection - Enid Blyton

91 Heart of Darkness - Joseph Conrad

92 The Little Prince - Antoine De Saint-Exupery

93 The Wasp Factory - Iain Banks

94 Watership Down - Richard Adams

95 A Confederacy of Dunces - John Kennedy Toole

96 A Town Like Alice - Nevil Shute

97 The Three Musketeers - Alexandre Dumas

98 Hamlet - William Shakespeare

99 Charlie and the Chocolate Factory - Roald Dahl

100 Les Miserables - Victor Hugo
I came up with about 40. How did you do?

Open Wide...

Daily Dose o' Cute


Video Description: Dudley comes upstairs and gets startled by Sophie, then play-bows at her to try to get her to play.

(Erm, I don't usually leave Pepsi cans on the floor. I didn't know that was there. Embarrassing!)

As always, still pix of the whole crew below the fold (on most browsers)...


Olivia


Sophie


Matilda


Dudley

Open Wide...

The Overton Window: Chapter Twenty-Nine

Remember last chapter? The one where Noah woke up? Yeah, thrilling stuff, huh? In this chapter, there is three times the action! I'll just sum it up before we get started, in case you feel like skipping ahead.

First, Bailey sets his watch. Then he sends an email. And finally Kearns puts the cat out.

Seriously.

I think I've figured out why this book is called a page-turner. It's keeping me intrigued. Not in the usual sense, mind you, that one would apply to a thriller. I am not soldiering on to see what happens next. I keep reading to see if anything happens next.

I am tempted just to skip this chapter myself, but duty compels me to give you all the lowdown, as it were. Do people still say "lowdown"? Or did that go out of fashion when Starsky & Hutch was cancelled?

For a man so worldly and knowledgeable, Bailey is ignorant of time zones:

"What time zone is Nevada?" Danny called out toward the trailer's kitchenette. His watch was a Rolex knockoff and it wasn't easy to reset, so whenever he was traveling he always put off messing with it for as long as possible. This, however, was shaping up to be a day when he'd need to know the time.

I guess knowing the time is good if you're going to sell a nuke to terrorists? Maybe? Okay. Duly noted.

They'd both overslept a bit and now there was a rush to get on the road. To add to the tension Kearns had said he'd been unable to reach his FBI contact the night before, and this morning he'd received a rather cryptic e-mail from their new terrorist brethren.

Do you feel that? The tension? Yeah, it's there. It says so right in the text. It's tense. Because they overslept. And they are going to be late for work school terrorism. Mom is going to be sooo mad.

About that cryptic email:

The message had been from the missing man, the one named Elmer. There was to be another meeting this afternoon, the real meeting this time, at which the weapon would be exchanged for the money, and some final brainstorming would take place on the eve of tomorrow's planned bombing in downtown Las Vegas. The rendezvous was set for 5 p.m., out somewhere in the desert so far from civilization that only a latitude and longitude were provided as a guide to get there.

I guess the meeting in the desert is the cryptic part? Just points on the GPS. I hope Kearns has a spare GPS. Because his other one is strapped to a bomb! If not, they're going to have to stop by Radio Shack.

And in case you forgot this is faction, check this out: "Between the two of them Danny was more capable on the computer, so it had been entrusted to him to plan the route to this remote location through a visit to MapQuest." Mapquest! For authenticity! That's what all terrorists use. And soccer moms. Are there still soccer moms? Anyone know?

Also, did you note that the man in charge of a vast internet-based sting operation is not all that computer savvy? Oh, that can't be good. That can't be good writing, I mean. Though, that is in line with him being a sorry agent all the way around:

While Kearns was in the bathroom Danny had logged on to his favorite anonymous e-mailing site and fired off a quick text update to his staff in Chicago, with a copy to Molly and a short list of other trusted compatriots:

* FYI ONLY DO NOT FORWARD DELETE AFTER READING *
Big mtg today, Monday PM, southern
Nevada. If you don't hear from me by
Wednesday I'm probably dead*, and this is
where to hunt for the body:
Lat 37°39'54.35"N Long 116°56'31.48"W
> S T A Y A W A Y from Nevada TFN < * I wish I was kidding



Kearns has let Bailey off the proverbial leash long enough now to get out text messages and emails? And this is the guy standing between Harry Reid's office and a nuclear bomb? Between five yokels and the largest act of terrorism the U.S. has ever suffered?

And Bailey has a staff? Does Double Rainbow guy have a staff too? I guess someone has to hold the camera when you're making Youtube videos. Sounds a little... what's the word? Not-boot-strappy? Don't tell me Bailey is a dilettante. Is that the right word? And why the hell is this chapter inspiring so many questions? Nevermind.

Bailey and Kearns load up the bomb again, and Bailey settles into "the shotgun seat."

Kearns appeared a minute or so later, but when he was halfway out to the vehicle he stopped and lightly smacked himself on the forehead as though something important had almost slipped his mind. He turned back and hurried to the front door of the trailer, unlocked it and held it open, called inside, and gestured for half a minute until that moth-eaten cat appeared and scampered past him out into the barren yard. Then Agent Kearns knelt and filled an inverted hubcap with water from the hose and set it carefully near the stairs, in a spot where it would stay cool in the shade for most of the day.

And that is that. The watch, the email, the cat. Yay for chapter twenty-nine.

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime



Marc Almond: "Tears Run Rings"

Open Wide...

This is so the worst thing you're going to read all day.

[Trigger warning for rape apologia and disregard for consent, autonomy, respect, and dignity.]

Approximately 97 million people (that's just rough estimate, and thanks to each of you) have sent me the link to a rather editorially curious piece at Jezebel, "American Guy in Paris Freed from the Idea of 'Consent'", in which a fella details how much more awesome Parisian women are because they are empowered by being groped. No, I'm not being funny:

Having just returned from living in Paris, I feel more convinced than ever that America gets many things wrong about sex. Right there near the top of the list is our attachment to the idea of consent.

In Paris, it seems as if the straight male attitude toward consent is that it doesn't exist. At clubs, bars, bistros, in the street or on the Metro, Parisian men lobby very aggressively for sex. At the clubs in the 8ème, off the Champs-Élysées, and all along Rue de Rivoli, it is fairly common to watch men literally grab and touch the girls who weave through the crowd.

...Parisian women seem to derive a feminist power from this chauvinism that makes them come across as strong, self-determining, and completely aware of themselves as permanent objects of desire. And drunk or sober, it seems Parisian women get exactly what they want while their men, if rejected, are left to hammer doggedly away at other targets. It's anybody's guess whether the Parisians are more sexually satisfied by this arrangement, but one thing seems sure: Parisian women seem empowered by it. They make the decisions.

In America, by contrast, the discourse on consent impresses upon us all, men and women alike, that sex is something more important than a decision.
I'll just briefly note, then swiftly file away under "No Doy," the fact that our French female readers do not express any less interest in the concept of consent than do female readers from other countries.

Beyond that, my reaction can be accurately, if succinctly, summed up thus:



UPDATE: Also see Sady.

Open Wide...

Hollerin' Back

[Trigger warning for sexual assault.]

So, there's this video going around the internets, which captures a woman who's been flashed/frottaged on a subway confronting the man who assaulted her. She gives him a look of utter contempt and yells, "That's it! Oh, you're getting fucking arrested! I'm not leaving your side. My plans are done for the night! I'm escorting you to the police station, okay? Oh yes. Oh fucking yes."

I'm not posting the video here, because the man filming the video says, with a tone that does not particularly suggest empathy, "Oh, this shit's going on YouTube, yo." There is no indication that it was uploaded with the woman's consent.

The video was nonetheless featured on Hollaback and on Jezebel, among other sites. A search was launched to locate the woman, who was being hailed as a hero.

Something that seems to have been lost, however, in the understandable desire to recognize this woman's actions is that she was sexually violated. It is considered, to put it mildly, bad form to publicly identify a survivor of sexual assault without hir consent, and, suffice it to say, trying to track down an anonymous survivor's identity is, um, somewhat problematic.

(Note: There is a difference between saying, for example, "If you're out there, contact me!" and "Twitter, please help me find her!")

I also wonder, if I'm honest, about the wisdom of widely celebrating a woman who makes a spectacle, and if that doesn't tacitly indict the women who don't.

I'm generally not one to suggest caution at the possibility of feeding into false frames—when it comes to political strategy, I almost exclusively advocate against cautiousness for a consideration of false frames—but that's because most progressive capitulation to false framing does harm, e.g. supporting a stupid war so as not to be erroneously cast as "soft on defense." In this case, the greater harm may be done by not acknowledging the demonstrable damage done by the rape culture narratives associated with s/he didn't scream and s/he didn't fight back.

Which is a long way of saying: I've seen the video, but it's not going to be posted here.

(Echidne, who does post the video with mixed emotions, also wisely expresses concern that the "bystanders seem to be busy taking videos and pictures but not actually helping her.")

Open Wide...

Hate Is A Family Value

The Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks such things, has designated the Family Research Council as a "hate group."

The SPLC gave the Family Research Council the designation due to anti-gay speech from its leaders, which the SPLC says includes calls for gay men and lesbians to be imprisoned.

Labeling the Family Research Council a hate group puts one of Washington's most powerful social issues advocates into the company of groups like the Nation of Islam and the now mostly defunct Aryan Nations in the eyes of the SPLC, which tracks 932 active hate groups in the U.S.

Groups are labeled hate groups by the SPLC -- which made a name for itself by using civil lawsuits to severely weaken the KKK and other white supremacist groups -- when they "have beliefs or practices that attack or malign an entire class of people, typically for their immutable characteristics," according to the group's website.

For the Family Research Council, which hosts the annual Values Voter Summit in Washington -- an event which this year drew presidential hopefuls like Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee -- the designation comes thanks to the group's standing at the forefront of opposition to gay marriage and open gay and lesbian service in the military.

The main offender in the eyes of the SPLC is Peter Sprigg, the FRC's senior researcher and vocal opponent of the gay rights movement. In May, Sprigg told me that an end to Don't Ask, Don't Tell would lead to more American servicemen receiving unwelcome same-sex fellatio in their sleep, part of a long line of reasoning from Sprigg suggesting that gay men are more likely to be sex offenders than anyone else.

The SPLC pointed to several other Sprigg comments when deciding to list the FRC as a hate group.

For instance, this:
[I]n March 2008, Sprigg, responding to a question about uniting gay partners during the immigration process, said: "I would much prefer to export homosexuals from the United States than to import them." He later apologized, but then went on, last February, to tell MSNBC host Chris Matthews, "I think there would be a place for criminal sanctions on homosexual behavior." "So we should outlaw gay behavior?" Matthews asked. "Yes," Sprigg replied.
[...]

The SPLC designation of the Family Research Council as an anti-gay hate group potentially poses more of a challenge for Republicans. Though many conservatives view the SPLC as a progressive group and therefore no more worthy of respect than, say, ACORN, the SPLC hate group label will almost undoubtedly make it into press reports about future events like the Values Voter Summit. That means Republican presidential hopefuls who may want to reach out to gay and lesbian Republican groups like the Log Cabin Republicans and GOProud -- which can be good sources of fundraising as well as "I'm not anti-gay" cred on the campaign trail -- may have to explain why they publicly praised and rushed to address a group that SPLC is calling one of the worst perpetrators of ugly myths about gays.
Cue up the accusations of "anti-Christian bigotry" and "promoting the Radical Homosexual Agenda" from the FRC in 5...4...3...2...1...Ignition...We have liftoff.

Cross-posted from Bark Bark Woof Woof.

Open Wide...

Wednesday Blogaround

This blogaround brought to you by Shaxco, makers of the Deeky Brand Tandem Snuggie. Now in Xanadouche pink!

Recommended Reading:

Resistance: Tam Phan

Andy: Senate to Hold DADT Hearings on Pentagon Report Next Week

Fannie: Coach Whips Boys Into Shape [TW for abuse, hazing, misogyny, gender policing]

Richard: Chandra Levy Murder Case Finally Closed After Nine Years

scatx: Siblings Rarely Share Personalities

Monique: Overcoming the Noble Savage & the Sexy Squaw: Native Steampunk

Irin: The Disturbing World Of Dickflash.com [TW for sexual assault, rape apologia]

Leave your links in comments...

Open Wide...

Two Facts

[Trigger warning for sexual assault.]

1. Ruth Marcus' brain was long ago replaced by a state-of-the-art judgment machine.

2. I never get tired of hearing what a whiny-ass binky baby I am because I may be triggered by the invasive, unwanted touching of my breasts and genitals.

It's interesting, ahem, that someone like me is cast as immature, as childish, as needing to "grow up," by virtue of my aversion to enhanced screening, because, the truth is, my childhood came to a screeching halt when I was raped at 16 and left to deal with the aftermath of the trauma on my own by the police, my school, and just about everyone who was supposed to care about me.

And it strikes me as naive to the point of childishness to not know or understand or accept or acknowledge that ugliness exists in the world, and that it changes people in ways they would never want to be changed.

Who's the real grown-up in this scenario? The woman who has empathy for survivors, for veterans with anxiety disorders, for adults with disabilities, for parents of children with disabilities, for people with genetic predispositions for cancer or are in remission from the disease, for children who aren't old enough to understand what's happening, for everyone who has reason to fear the potential consequences of being subjected to back-scatter scans and/or enhanced pat-downs, or the woman who haughtily sniffs "grow up" at all of those people...?

Naturally, we are both grown-ups. But this isn't about being immature, not really. It's about being weak.

There's this persistent idea that identifying as someone who is vulnerable to trauma- and/or disability-born triggers is evidence of weakness (and/or immaturity, or frailty), but I cannot begin to explain how much easier it would be to not publicly identify this way. I don't like reading that I "identify as a victim" and that I'm "too fragile for the world" and I'm "always aggrieved" and all the other shit that gets written about me, personally—and frequently at other feminist blogs, much to my chagrin—on a regular basis. I don't like getting emails accusing me of being weak and pathetic and a baby and a broken person. I don't like trolls who say the same in comments.

It would be infinitely easier if I were not forthcoming about who I actually am and what I've actually experienced and what that actually means in terms of living in a culture that is hostile to people who are demonstrably vulnerable in any kind of way.

But easy would be dishonest. I don't have the luxury of easy.

Not anymore.

Easy is a relic of the childhood I left behind long ago, in a pool of blood on my bedroom floor.

I'm a grown-up, Ms. Marcus. I can barely remember a time when I wasn't.

And I'm not alone.

Open Wide...

Really?

[Trigger warning for invasion of privacy, dismissal of sexual assault]

As seen on CNN.com a few minutes ago:



[A screen capture from CNN.com. In the middle there's a picture of an airport security checkpoint, under which, I shit you not, is the headline "It's not all grab-and-scan at airports." Then CNN reports for the benefit of the TSA: "Despite all the hoopla over security measures at airports, the Transportation Security Administration estimates that less than 3 percent of air travelers will receive enhanced pat-downs." Again, I shit you not.]

Four quick points, not even touching the actual story:

1) CNN, you still bite.

2) Yay for corporations doing the bidding of the police state, or vice-versa.

3) "Grab-and-scan"?!?! I guess "It's not all sexual assault at the airport" wasn't as edgy.

4) "Less than 3 percent" of travelers are being sexually assaulted via "enhanced pat-down" on any given trip to the airport? That's not reassuring, that's horrifying, particularly given the extremely high percentage of travelers that have to show naked pictures of themselves when they fly.

Discuss.

Open Wide...

Your Morning TSA Security Round-Up

[Trigger warning for fat hatred and general harm.]

The HillNext step for body scanners could be trains, boats, metro:

The next step in tightened security could be on U.S. public transportation, trains and boats.

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano says terrorists will continue to look for U.S. vulnerabilities, making tighter security standards necessary.

"[Terrorists] are going to continue to probe the system and try to find a way through," Napolitano said in an interview that aired Monday night on "Charlie Rose."

"I think the tighter we get on aviation, we have to also be thinking now about going on to mass transit or to trains or maritime. So, what do we need to be doing to strengthen our protections there?"
Is she having a laugh?

AP—TSA: Some gov't officials to skip airport security: "Cabinet secretaries, top congressional leaders and an exclusive group of senior U.S. officials are exempt from toughened new airport screening procedures when they fly commercially with government-approved federal security details. ... The TSA would not explain why it makes these exceptions. But many of the exempted government officials have gone through several levels of security clearances, including FBI background checks." TSA has also now exempted flight attendants, in addition to pilots.

Disability ScoopTSA: Pat-Downs A Must For Some With Disabilities:
In an open letter (pdf) to members of the disability community, a top Transportation Security Administration official says that some people with disabilities will be required to undergo "alternate screening techniques including pat-downs."

... TSA officials say some people with disabilities are ineligible for the body scanners and therefore must automatically undergo secondary screening measures. This includes individuals who use wheelchairs or other mobility devices and cannot stand, travelers with service animals, people who rely on a cane or walker and those unable to lift their arms to shoulder level for several seconds.

Similarly, travelers who are accompanying or assisting a person who cannot pass through the machines will also be subject to alternative screening measures, wrote Kimberly Walton, the TSA’s special counselor in the letter.

"There is nothing punitive about our measures; it just makes good security sense," Walton wrote.
Daily Fail'We hate obese passengers and people with personal hygiene issues': TSA staff vent their anger at patdown searches: This whole story is a clusterfuck. TSA staff interviewed are being verbally abused by passengers, which is terrible, but they are also talking about how disgusting it is to be forced to touch fat people, how being accused of molestation is worse than actually being molested, and how being a man made to touch another man's genitals is horrible (not because it's intrinsically wrong, but because of how totes gay it is). I sincerely doubt/hope that these 17 agents are representative of their entire vocation, but just knowing that there are agents thinking this stuff is yet another disincentive to travel.

Meanwhile, in efficacy news...

Ars Technica—Adam Savage: TSA saw my junk, missed 12" razor blades.

And this is reassuring...

CNN—Law enforcement officer left loaded gun magazine on plane: "A federal law enforcement officer mistakenly left a loaded gun magazine that was found Tuesday on a Southwest Airlines plane, officials said. ... The head of the Transportation Security Administration said the unnamed law officer will be given remedial training."

Open Wide...

Seen

Last night while exiting the gorcery store I saw an SUV with this vinyl decal on the window:



[Image of sticker reading: "stop GARDISIL the HPV Vaccine".]


Huh? Is there something controversial about Gardisil? I checked Wikipedia (facts, bitchez!) and there was something about Rick Perry and Merck and promiscuity, but... Whut?

Open Wide...

On Bathrooms and Projection

[Trigger warning for transphobia, body policing, gender policing, sexual violence.]

The great Molly Ivins once said (and I'm paraphrasing here, because I can't find the exact quote) that if you ever want to know what conservatives are doing, just listen to what they're accusing progressives of doing.

That was a keen insight about projection.

Whether it's accusing gays and feminists of undermining the sanctity of marriage, accusing gays of recruiting kids or shoving their sexuality in people's faces or aggressive sexuality, accusing feminists of being man-haters or unable to see past gender, accusing marginalized people of wanting special rights, accusing women-centric spaces of being dangerous for men, accusing progressives of trying to impose their views on everyone or rooting for foreign policy failures or hating America, or warbling about the War on Christmas, the liberal media, voter fraud, or any one of a thousand other grievances, time and time again, it's just conservatives assuming (wrongly) that progressive ideology makes people the ethically-challenged authoritarians that they are.

A thief always suspects someone is stealing from hir, after all.

One of the memes deeply associated with conservative (and fauxgressive) projection is the OH NOES BATHROOM PANIC! meme. You've heard this one before: Trans men and women must be marginalized from society, especially society's bathrooms, because of how they want to INVADE PUBLIC BATHROOMS AND RAPE PEOPLE. Or something. There are a bunch of variations on the same theme; just look for "man in a dress" and "what about the children?!" and some vague implication that trans women (in particular) just go through a lifetime of experiences ranging from Challenging to Sheer Hell for the explicit purpose of getting access to cis women in ladies' rooms, behind doors that magically don't let in cis men determined to do women harm. Or something.

Basically, all you need to know about this general argument is that it's stupid and cruel and has no rational basis. And that Phyllis Schlafly was using it to tank the ERA before my ancient ass was ever born. OH NOES BATHROOM PANIC! is so old it's got brontosaurus shit in the treads of its sensible shoes. Is what I'm saying.

It's a fantasy, a conservative fever-dream that keeps alarmists up at night clutching their pearls and praying to the Baby Jesus on behalf of victims of trans bathroom violence who don't exist. There is no endemic danger associated with trans people using public bathrooms. ENDA is not a slippery slope. Spoiler Alert: Trans people use public bathrooms already all the time. BOOGA BOOGA!

There are trans women and men busily living their lives in a cis-privileged world without lots of (most) cis people ever taking notice, and the ignorant fuckheads who engage in bathroom fearmongering have to pretend that isn't the case for any of their bigoted shit to make the slightest bit of sense. They're relying, of course, on the fact that the people upon whose ignorant and hateful fears they prey won't realize the mendacious turds who manipulate them know full fucking well that trans people already use public bathrooms.

They're also relying on the fact that those people will never be relieved of their ignorance and bigotry by trans people telling their stories, and by allies saying things like: I am well aware that there are trans women, some of whom might well have a penis, using the same public restrooms I do—Spoiler Alert: AND I DON'T FUCKING CARE—and anyone who's under the misapprehension that no trans women ever currently use women's bathrooms is a cloistered ignoramus who may well have been deliberately misled by a transphobic asshole with an agenda.

So, in case I haven't made myself abundantly clear: Trans women and men and cis women and men already share bathrooms. This is not a tragedy or cause for alarm. OH NOES BATHROOM PANIC! is unmitigated bullshit. The End.

Because trans people do use public bathrooms, occasionally someone who is at an early stage in transition and/or doesn't "pass" well will get harassed or detained. Like Tyjanae Moore, who was arrested last week after using the women's bathroom at a downtown Houston library.

Get her—thinking she's a WOMAN! (Spoiler Alert: She is.)

Everyone's all confused and alarmed, naturally. Something MUST be done! Why? Because OH NOES BATHROOM PANIC! of course. We must immediately Do Something because of the Mendacious Meme that we've invented to marginalize trans people for no good reason! Et cetera.

And what this is, is projection.

Trans women and men do not, as a rule, make it their business to harass, attack, or otherwise hurt cis women and men in public bathrooms. Or private bathrooms. Or any bathrooms at all, really.

On the other hand, there are not a few cis women and men who make it their bloody goddamn fucking business to harass, target, make a spectacle of, report trans women and men who are minding their own business in public bathrooms.

You want to know what transphobes are up to?

"We think trans people will hurt us in bathrooms!"

They're using bathroom panic to hurt trans people. Right from the projectioneer's mouth.

[H/T to Eastsidekate.]

Open Wide...